Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens profile Correction STM

Similar Questions

• Where can I find the lens for my Canon mount Rokinon 14 mm lens profile?

  I'm looking for the profile of the lens of a 14 mm Rokinon lens mount Canon.  I use an iMac running OS X El Capitan and Lightroom CC 10.1.1.

  Jean ndiaye says:

  I'll try to find where the Downloader placed the profile and then move to... users (subfolder?) files.

  Adobe Lens profile Downloader will automatically place the profile of lenses to the location of the user folder. On my Windows 7 system, it installs the lens here profiles:

  C:\Users\[your username]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\Downloaded

  On a Mac system they should be installed here:

  Macintosh HD / users / [username] / Library / Application Support / Adobe / CameraRaw / LensProfiles /.

  In the profile panel, select 'Make' > 'Canon' and then look in the 'Model' list entry "Samyang 14 mm F2.8. You may need to scroll through the list by using the small arrow at the bottom of the list to see.

  

• Canon EF 400/5.6 lens profile

  My copy of LR4 doesn't have a profile for the Canon EF 400/5.6. He is one for the EF 400/4 IS and the EF 400/2.8 IS, but not for the 400/5.6. This means that this goal does not need all corrections or just that no one bothers?

  If you download the Creater of free lens profile on Adobe Labs, it comes with a lens profile Downloader, where you can download the profiles created by the user. You can get it here: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/lensprofile_creator.html

  There are currently several profiles for the 400/5.6 with and without a teleconverter.

  All lenses are in need of corrections...

• Canon, in the face of fast moving subjects 18-55 kit lens?

  Hi everyone, I'm new here.

  I was doing one shoot the other day on very fast subjects that changed a lot of direction (dogs). Got some good shots but the vast majority were evil out of the home, which was a real shame. I want to know if it's the lens, the body or my technique that does not reach me.

  I'm relatively new to photography, so maybe it's that my settings are wrong or my technique is bad. I'm using the lens wide open, not mode live view with servo AF on a 600 d body. Usually when I focus I pan just the camera turn to follow the subject, sometimes pressing down when I want to shoot.

  I plan the upgrade to the 17-55 f2.8 because it is sharp wide open and has a constant and fast opening and USM and full-time manual focus with a correct focus ring.

  Thank you.

  Your problems are probably due to a combination of factors. IMO, auto focus performance is determined by three things...

  1. camera AF capabilities. Your 600 d has 9 AF points system. Only one of these points - the center one - is the "best" type of cross that is more responsive and follows the movement better. When shooting moving subjects with your camera, it would be useful to limit yourself to using only the central point. (Note: other Canon cameras have more advanced systems of the AF.) T4i, T5i, 60 d, 50 d and 40 d has 9 AF points that looks like, but all nine points are the cross-type sesnors 'better '. The 7 d and 70 d AF 19 points, with all of the nineteen cut type. 5DIII and 1DX 61 points AF with up to 41 Cup type, depending on the lens used.)

  Some cameras are also optimized for performance development. For example, the models of the series 1 d and 7 d have a separate chip driving AF... While most (maybe all?) other models share the tasks of AF by the same processor that handles images.

  2 capacity autofocus lens: Yes, a reader of "USM" (Ultrasonic Motor) objective as the EF-S 17 - 55 / 2.8 would be an improvement on your kit lens. It is faster, less hunting and is quieter than a 'micro' such as is used in the cheaper kit lens. (Note: there is a version a bit more of the 18-55mm with drive focus "STM" or "Stepper motor", which is better than the micro motor version, but still not as fast as USM.) STM lenses are running silent and particularly well suited for video.)

  A larger aperture, like the 17-55 / 2.8 (as opposed to your 18-55/3.5-5.6), offers more light to the camera AF sensors, allowing for faster and better follow-up.

  No, forget all the EF 50/1.8... Of course, he got more openness, but it uses a micro motor and is widely known to be developed slower, less accurate and likely to hunt more than a USM lens. If you want a quick and of course focusing in short and medium telephoto, look to the EF 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100/2 or L-135/2 lenses. These all use USM drive and are much faster and more accurate than the EF 50/1.8. They have also one or two larger max aperture stop that even the 17-55 / 2.8 (or any other zoom lens), provide more light for the camera to work with. Using a f2.8 lens or "faster" will give optimal performance on your camera, with the centre of focus.

  A few drinks simply are not designed to be developed fast, even if they have more large openings and USM focus. Macro lenses, for example, have to move their focus group a long, long way to go from infinity to 1:1 magnification tends to be slower. In addition, very large aperture lenses such as the 85 / 1.2 L are generally slower... Design. Very large aperture lenses and macro focus on precision, to deal with the shallow depth of the effects on the ground, rather than speed.

  Other objectives are designed to the very fast development. All 70-200, the 100-400 and all the first 300mm lenses and more, are quite fast focusing. Extreme telephotos such as 500 and 600 mm can be difficult to get and keep on target, however.

  Some third-party lenses also make use of similar to Canon's USM development drive, to help the performance of the update. Sigma HSM and Tamron lenses USD are examples.

  3. skills of the user is the third key factor making the update performance... that is, your technique.

  You mention servos 'AF '...  Just to clarify, yourcamera has three focus modes: one-shot, HAVE Focus and AI Servo... There is no "Servo AF. The correct mode to use with moving subjects is AI Servo. Perhaps what you are already doing. In any case, One Shot is almost only used with stationary subjects (there are techniques of 'pre-focus' where it can be used with moving subjects, but those who are rarely used). I Focus is not really a foucs mode at all... It is supposed to decide for you, if the subject is moving, then change to use the correct mode. I have not tested on a recent, but older model where I tried, I found a slight delay that causes a lot of discussion missed shots. He also simply chose the wrong mode sometimes. It might be interesting to note that Canon more pro-oriented models have same AI Focus... they offer only One Shot or AI Servo.

  So, make sure that you are using AI Servo to maximize performance when shooting moving subjects.

  You also use a slow shutter speed. I inflate the ISO and try to use 1/500 or faster shutter speeds. 1/320 or 1/400 is very marginal, trying to stop the movement of the subject with something as fast as the dogs in action. In fact, more you are close to the subject, shutter speed more fast you will really need to freeze movement.

  Cannon also noted that the 18MP models are a little prone to blur shake camera - probably because of the high density of pixels on the sensor sites - and recommends keeping shutter speeds upwards to be sure to get a sharp shot, even with IS lenses. There was a white paper on this subject, on the Canon website. I don't know if it is still available online.

  You should be able to get nice images, specific to ISO 1600... a complete stop of two higher and you to use much faster shutter speed. However, if the indoor shooting it may be areas that are not as well informed and are hard to get a sharp shot.

  You can shoot RAW files, so that you can more fully control noise reduction and factors in post-processing exposure when using high ISO.

  A popular technique among photographers of sports/action is back button to the point. See this article online, on this subject: http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2011/backbutton_af_article.shtml

  BBF separates the function of the development of the trigger. You use rather your thumb on one of the rear camera buttons to start and stop the development. Many users feel that this allows more safe and followed acquistion with moving subjects. You can configure your camera for BBF and give it a try. It is possible for action/sport/HAVE Servo shooting, it's actually usable once, too... I used it enough only for a few years now.

  With the help of BBF, I start AF well before that I want to take the picture, then focus on the maintenance of the area to focus on the right of the subject where I want the lens to focus continuing to follow and maintain the emphasis... then take pictures along the way. I use the Center Focus point alone, much of the time. This could lead to too centered images, so I try to fit a little loose from time to time, allowing cropping to make that fewer centered images. I sometimes use other than the Center AF point... but who wouldn't recommend with action shot on a camera that does not have the type sensors crossed to peripheral issues, such as your 600 d.

  I use a pair of 7Ds and a number of USM lenses fast development of shoot a lot of sports. With a few years of practice under my belt, on avearage I nail focus on 95 to 98 on 100 shots using this type of gear with the above techniques. I turned to 4000 images at an event recent and marked about 30 people like "rejected" to missed focus problems (and I bet at least half of those who are my fault... not the machine). There may be a few others that are marginally acceptable (i.e., can make an 8 x 10 beautiful print, but seem not good any more greater than). Yet, even if there are 80 or 120 spleen focus, it is only 2 or 3%... much better than only 10% in short.

  I would say that qualities of objective performance and user techniques generally count more than the camera well, or at least can largely compensate for any camera shortcomings. I got results almost as good 50 d and 30 d before it (which were similar to your 600 d AF system) and even with 10 days earlier ("lower" than your AF system). Although I'm a bit away, I didn't like good luck shooting moving subjects using 5 d Mark II (I mostly just use it for stationary subjects)... the 5 d Mark III has a much better AF system and follows the movement much better.

  I hope this helps!

  ***********
  Alan Myers

  San Jose, California, USA.
  «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
  MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
  FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY

• I own the Canon SX HS 50 and love it, however, I like the lens wide angle on the SH SX60

  Canon sx hs 50 is a bit amazing camera with the possibility of zoom to large and clarity.  I had a little more than a year.  The new sx 60 SH has some new features that I like... the lens wide angle and the creation of custom effects.  However, the stability of the camera is very fragile when zoomed out.  I question the value of the upgrade of the 50 to 60.

  My shots are more abstract... by zooming in on the structures, eyes, etc.  I can take pictures of my car with the 50 but not sure that this would be possible with the 60.  I appreciate any input... or is there another cannon with the lilke long zoom of 50 with some of the features of the 1960s.

  Thanks a lot for your comments,.

  I don't have one. But you said you've tried, so I guess you tried in store right? In-store, normally the brightness isn't enough so the shutter speed will be slow and you will see shake. In addition, setting the device also comes into play here too. The best way, take the 50 SX with you to the store, set the similar to your 50HS 60HS. Then take the photo and compare. Sometimes, in the store settings are not optimal.

• Canon 24-70mm f2.8 II - profile correction does not

  LR5 profile for the lens correction above does not work. It seems that it is a blank profile with zero distortion data. In revenge, the profile of the older lens, canon 24-70mm 2.8 I works well.

  Having owned both I know version II of this objective within a distortion, but it is certainly not zero on the range. It is one of the most important top of the line for Canon lenses, I'm sure many like me would love this corrected profile.

  Thank you.

  I also have to mention that in this profile data can actually be invalid because the focus distance so that the lens is 0.38 m

  Another more fundamental reason to regard it with suspicion, would be that it signals a crop factor of 0, (of course) which is impossible.

  The fact that someone in the community has rated 5 out ot 5 for the quality, is AFAICT, not exactly making authority.

  The profile already installed with LR is distinguished by be generated with the 5 d Mk II, not the 5 d Mk III, but IMO is no reason to not prefer in other respects. Adobe seem to have done a thorough job here job.

  It seems in this case, if a profile (apparently not valid) that was downloaded by the user, takes precedence over the "built-in". (These two categories of profile are stored in locations of different files with different permissions for the user.)

  If you are not aware, the profile that should be selected automatically against a target shown in the footage, ID can be controlled by the user. Choose "Set as default" profile picker, after manually by choosing a he. All images with the same ID of the Lens, where the choice of a profile reads "Default" (which is a parameter of security to impose through all images), will adopt following a selection profile user-fixed, all by themsleves.

  RP

• Canon 60 d with EF-S 15-85 IS USM lack of profile of lenses in Lightroom 4

  It is a combination of kit Canon and it seems odd it is not included in the profile of Canon for the correction of the goal.  The EF-S 10-22 IS USM lens is there is not an objective of kit and quite expensive.  Did I miss a step, or do I have to download additional lenses to Adobe?  I prefer not having to download someone assumed that the creator of the profile if I can avoid it.

  It is included, but it's a raw profile only.

  There are also two on the Downloader, which I made.  It has nothing to do with her out.

• ACR not not automatically recognizing objective profile for Sigma 150-600 C

  If I put the lens profile correction auto and took a shot with the Sigma C 150-600 (on any of my body Canon - SL1, 6 d, 70 d) I get a message saying 'Impossible to locate the corresponding lens automatically profile '.

  As soon as I select Sigma in the drop-down list, the right lens is selected and profile correctly applied to the image, but it's a total pain as I have to do it manually for each shot, or cover replace the car with Sigma, which throws everything if I got caught with more than one objective in a session.

  Is there something that can be done to make it recognize? CC of Photoshop and ACR are both up-to-date after the update.

  You are welcome. Thanks for the image of the sample.

  First thing I noticed is that the name of lens EXIF '150-600mm F5-6. 3 DG OS HSM | Contemporary 015 "

  In the original example images, that we received from SIGMA, the name was 150-600mm.

  Change you EXIF data using an external tool?

  If not, it may be that SIGMA has released an update of the firmware that I wasn't aware that includes an updated lens name. In any case, I can easily solve this problem and it is ready for our next release.

  Kind regards

  -Chris

• Using a profile correction lens for micro four thirds?

  I have a Panasonic 5 GM (micro four-thirds) using an Olympus 9 mm f8.0 fisheye.  The lens is silent (has no electrical contacts) so the camera knows what the lens is fixed and Lightroom cannot apply an AutoCorrect entry to the lens distortion and CA. I downloaded Adobe Lens profile creator and created a successful * *.lcp file to my goal.  It is installed in the subdirectory of files standard (I think):

  Users/[username]/appdata/roaming/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles/1.0 (using a PC).  I use RAW files, but lightroom does not show the profile of correction as being available for my goal.  I downloaded a custom * *.lcp from Adobe and it went into a subdirectory under 1.0 "downloaded" heading, so I put a copy of my profile in there also.  I can see the downloaded profile. Still no luck with mine of Adobe Lens profile creator.  I know that most of the profiles of micro 4/3 lenses are applied automatically. Does this mean that Lightroom will not recognize my custom profiles?  I can apply a standard profile Canon or Nikon to my photos, so it does not resemble lens profiles are disabled for micro 4/3 images in itself.  Thanks in advance for any help.  R. Ikenberry

  Have you created the profile for RAW and not for jpg - they are different?

  Look for this line in the profile (several entries): stCamera:CameraRawProfile

• ACR 6.7 RC1 sharpening artifacts when capture sharpening 5DM 3

  I seem to be getting artifacts sharpening with cab 6.7 RC1 at relatively low levels of sharpening with Canon 5 DM 3 files using the tab "Details".  For example even at 200 ISO, I see these levels as 40-6-25-0.  If I place the masking it gets a little better, but I have never seen it primarily using a 40 d.  I refine it to 100% view, but even at 50%, this is visible.  I use CS5 on a desktop Dell Studio under Windows 7 Home Premium.   This is through dozens of images, which are properly exposed.  (Did apply no light/exposure/contrast or clarity, etc.)

  Anyone else seeing this?

  The effect is what is called "screen" was caused by the noise becomes distorted when applying for a string (for example, the lens profile correction).  In the previous example, a sharpening setting very high with no masking and no noise reduction has been applied to a moderate ISO image.

  I suggest to apply using masking and Luminance Noise reduction more when you apply sharpening. This avoids the model entirely.

• LR3 lens correction parameters

  Hi guys! I downloaded LR3 yesterday and played with the trial version for a few hours now. It looks like a very welcome upgrade on version 2.x. However, I can't fully appreciate how lens correction module is supposed to work.

  I am a user of nikon with lens Tamron 28-75. After setting "custom" lens profile correction and choosing Tamron as lens manufacturer, LR3 precisely my lens model is proposed and assigns an existing adobe profile. So far so good. But there is one thing that keeps me from feeling all happy and excited by this new feature: Lightroom would not save the different defaults for different focal lengths. For example, the goal of tamron 28-75/2.8 named above has somewhat considerate Canon type distortion at 28mm, and at the same time to its maximum of 75mm geometry, distortions are almost non-existent. So although I am happy with how LR3 manages wide-angle distortions, it makes things a lot more wrong with telephoto lens when I apply the default lens corrections.

  Where the question: can I somehow make settings in the module changes specific to the used focal length lens? Of course, I wish that LR do this for me, but since he cannot, there is a walkaround? Tweaking the settings for each shot takes a long time, and I see no reason not to make this a little more automated process.

  They should be at 100 without worrying.

  Think of it this way. LR is focal length setting and applying corrections. It gives you a 100 as the starting point. This means that 100% of the correction is applied. Lower dial 100 and lower the correction is applied. He switched and he too made the distortion/CA/Vig.

  Think of it as a volume control for the profile being applied.

• Where are the profiles of missing in Lightroom CC 2015.1 Canon lenses?

  Lens profiles for Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 and Canon EF - S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 lack in Lightroom CC 2015.1 even if they were there in Lightroom 5.x. They are no longer present in the lens profile menu drop-down. Where have they gone?

  Objective JPEG profiles are not provided for the Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 and Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 and perhaps other lenses. That is why the list is shorter. You will need the Lens profile Downloader allows you to add profiles from JPEG lenses for these lenses.

  Mac

  http://www.Adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5491

  Windows

  http://www.Adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5492

  You will need need to install Adobe AIR application, first use the Downloader:

  https://get.Adobe.com/air/

• 18-55mm or 18-135mm lens?

  I decided to buy the canon 650 d / Rebel T4i and would like to know which lens is best to them.

  18-55 mm and 18-135 mm lens has the same 'Image quality '?
  What lens takes better videos?

  haveadoubt wrote:

  I decided to buy the canon 650 d / Rebel T4i and would like to know which lens is best to them.

  18-55 mm and 18-135 mm lens has the same 'Image quality '?
  What lens takes better videos?

  The lenses are in the same general category, so I don't think you'll see a big difference in IQ between the two outside test charts and pixel peeping.  It is a popular question, so that you can read all kinds of opinions on it if you do a search for it, but the main thing is this consensus: the 18-55, when coupled with the 55-250, gives a little better IQ (and will of course).  The 18-135 gives a good amount of range in a single case.  If the choice comes down to a slight advantage of IQ, or the convenience of a single lens that can be great for travel or street photography.

  If you do not plan on getting a longer telephoto lens to accompany him then I would get the 18-135 for the extra reach.

• Quick Menu for Canon PIXMA MX452 software

  Whenever I click on the program of Quick Menu for the product in question, I get the following error message:

  Quick menu Canon stopped working.  A problem caused the blocking of the program works correctly.  Windows will close the program and notify you if a solution is available.

  I've uninstalled and reinstalled the driver and software Quick Menu several times, both the disk and online downloads.

  I turned off my anti-anti-virus/firewall program and also said the security program the program of Canon is a trusted application.

  I am able to print/scan/copy, but not on the Quick Menu, which is more convenient.

  Help, please.

  Hi clarkdjensen,

  There may be a third scanner driver interferes with the Quick Menu.  Please, try the following:

  1. click on 'Start' and then on 'computer '.

  2. in the left pane, click the arrow next to the record Local (c).

  3. click on the arrow next to Windows to open the folder

  4. highlight the twain_32 folder.

  5. the folder should have 2 folders that begin with PIXMA MX452 and a file called wiatwain.ds.  Other folders or files must be moved to the office.

  6. restart the computer and try to scan the image.

• The lens Canon Macro 60 mm f2.8 fits my Canon EOS Rebel SL1?

  The lens Canon Macro 60 mm f2.8 work on my Canon EOS Rebel SL1?

  Yes.  It's a lens EF - S (EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM lens)

  The SL1 Rebel can use almost any lens Canon EOS... regardless of EF-S vs EF.  He can even use the TS-E and MP-E lenses.

  Lenses which does not take your camera are the "EF - M" lenses (there are two of them at last I checked).  Those who are made to the 'mirrorless' body of Canon, which is not sold in North America.