Card crypto applied to the Vlan Interface of the 1841 router

Similar Questions

• Crypto applied on the loopback interface

  Hello

  Here's one of our 2811 router config, we applied crypto on the loopback interface, but its does not work. Can you review the cofig and let us know the suggesstion as elsewhere where we can apply crypto map to VPN to work.

  site #sh run

  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 5956 bytes

  !

  version 12.4

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  encryption password service

  !

  Site host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  enable secret cisco

  !

  No aaa new-model

  !

  resources policy

  !

  iomem 25 memory size

  clock timezone IS - 5

  clock to summer time EDT recurring

  No network-clock-participate wic 2

  No network-clock-participate wic 3

  IP subnet zero

  !

  !

  IP cef

  No dhcp use connected vrf ip

  !

  controller T1 2/0/0

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  controller T1 0/2/1

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  controller T1 3/0/0

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  controller T1 3/0/1

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  ISAKMP crypto key wsld0829 address 66.78.246.175

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac rtpset

  !

  RTP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined by peer 66.78.246.175

  Set transform-set rtpset

  match address 110

  !

  !

  !

  interface Loopback0

  Description * IP address links multiple serial lines *.

  IP 168.88.110.200 255.255.255.252

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/0/0

  Description * Sprint HCGS/987682 / / LB *.

  no ip address

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/1/0

  Description * Sprint HCGS/987683 / / LB *.

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  interface Serial0/2/0:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/2/1:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/3/0:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  Shutdown

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  interface Serial0/3/1:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  Shutdown

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  interface virtual-Template1

  IP unnumbered Loopback0

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  IP classless

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 160.81.110.209

  IP route 200.3.201.0 255.255.255.0 207.40.33.100

  IP route 203.13.189.0 255.255.255.0 207.40.33.100

  !

  IP http server

  no ip http secure server

  !

  Note access-list 110 Tunnel ACL

  access-list 110 note authorization router loopback

  access-list 110 permit ip 168.88.110.200 host 67.210.111.204 0.0.0.15

  access-list 110 note IP3 allowing

  access-list 110 permit ip 207.41.32.106 host 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  access-110 note peripheral authorization

  access-list 110 permit ip 208.3.187.0 0.0.0.15 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  access-list 110 permit ip 208.3.187.16 0.0.0.7 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  access-list 110 permit ip 208.3.187.24 0.0.0.1 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  Line con 0

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  Cisco password

  local connection

  !

  end

  Your suggestion will be highly appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Khan

  1: try to add the following command in your router.

  Panel MultiLink virtual-model 1

  2: set 'crypt map rtp' command in virtual model 1 void-configuation.

  3: remove 'crypt map rtp' command of all the interface configuration and closure of the serial interface.

  4: highly recommended to remove the following command from each serial interface.

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  5: If still does not work, apply new 'crypt card rtp"command in all interfaces of Seraglio under configuration.

  Jerry

• Crypto can be applied by entering ethernet interface.

  Hello

  We try to form a VPN tunnel between two routers connected by point-to-point link between two hosts on part and on the other. (host A to router LAN A to host b. router lan B). We have tunnel successfully implemented by the application cryptographic cards for two series of routers interfaces. Data from host a to host B by this tunnel formed on the serial interfaces.

  This is, what serial link toggle ISDN backup takes and data are transferred via ISDN link, as crypto is not applied to the ISDN data past unencrypted. To work around this situation, is possible to apply the crypto to fastethernet interfaces of routers, in this case the data that can go by series or ISDN, it will be permanently encrypted.

  The configuration is very simple.

  We establish the tunnnel as address serial peer, can we put peer as ethernet addrsss addrees and form the tunnel.

  We tried, but it doesn't work.

  Any link on cisco.com is much appreciated.

  Thankx in advance

  Subodh

  Hi Subodh

  You must apply the encryption on the BRI interface card too so that also your crossing of data through the IRB gets encrypted.

  I feel in this case, you must create another card encryption with similar parameters so that you can apply the same on BRI interface.

  regds

• 2 crypto maps to the external interface? Possible?

  Hi, I have a little problem with a PIX 515 UR on FOS 6.3 (1).

  What I'm trying to do is to run 2 VPN site to site to him. The thing is: although I can get two separate crypt cards into the config, its only the more recent which is active when I do a ' sh crypto his '.

  Anyone have any ideas?

  TIA-

  Gary

  I do multiple like this:

  I have the main Board, applied externally:

  toXXXX interface card crypto outside

  Then, I build maps more screaming like ACL if:

  toXXXX 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto toXXXX 20 match address no_nat (name of the ACL)

  card crypto toXXXX 20 peers set x.x.x.x

  toXXXX 20 transform-set mytrans crypto card

  life safety association set card crypto toXXXX 20 seconds 3600 4608000 kilobytes

  toXXXX 40 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto toXXXX 40 correspondence address toACME (name of the ACL)

  card crypto toXXXX 40 peers set x.x.x.x

  toXXXX 40 transform-set mytrans crypto card

  life safety association set card crypto toXXXX 40 seconds 3600 4608000 kilobytes

• Card crypto on Interface Ethernet

  Hi all

  I don't have that much experience but with VPN configs, so maybe this question will seem a bit silly. I have a Cisco 831 that I use to connect via VPN to a remote site. Everything works fine.

  Then I wanted to add a second tunnel to another location. I did all the configs needed, applied card encryption on ethernet external and everything was fine, I could connect. But then I noticed that the new encryption card has actually replaced the existing one. Of course, the first VPN was no longer works.

  Is this a limitation of the 831? Or y at - it another way to configure them so I can use the two (or even more than two) at the same time? Do I need another Cisco router if I want more than a tunnel?

  Any help is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Stefan

  This isn't a limitation of the router. But by design,.

  only one crypto map set can be assigned to an interface. If multiple crypto map entries have the same name but a different seq - num map, they are considered as part of the same set, and all apply to the interface.

  So what you need to do is create crypto-map with the same name for slot 2, but give a different sequence number. Apply this encryption card to the interface and it will work. From the seq - num lowest crypto card is considered to be the highest priority, and will be evaluated first.

• seized correspondence interface card crypto

  I wonder if I put the command 'ip nat outside' to my external interface required before entering the cryto entry card "card crypto map name of the command?

  concerning

  Not necessary unless you're natting. Where the order will be as shown below

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml

• is excluded them VLAN interfaces in the GAL

  Hello community,

  I have a problem with the configuration of LAG on Cisco SFE2010P 3xSwitch battery.

  The switch has in fact only web GUI. Console - too, but it is not very useful.

  I need to configure Interfaces 1/g3 and g3/2 in one SHIFT. And VLAN (vlan by default) of 60 and 110 (voice), through to allow.

  After that I configured the LAG with both interfaces, "Port of Vlan" LAG settings show me the vlan 60 is untagged and vlan 110 is labeled.

  But if I take a glance on the 1/g3 Interfaces and "Port to LAN" settings 2/g3, both VLAN interfaces are "excluded". I can't access the default gateway, which is directly connected with this settings. The default gateway is a 3750Stack whose address IP of HSRP. It has two uplinks in port the SFE2010P channel.

  I have only one Interface to 100 Mbps on the SFE2010P connected to a trunk on the spine interface. And it works in this way. But using the links LWL LAG now does not work.

  Why are the VLAN 60 and 110 is excluded on the interfaces in the GAL and how can I change it? Thank you.

  Thank you

  Sergej

  Hi Sergei, you cannot configure the individual port within an OFFSET to a vlan. When you join the VLAN, you must select the offset group, not the individual port.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Cryptographic cards are allowed on the Ethernet ports

  I want to set up encryption between E0 on RouterA and E0 on RouterB. Is this possible?

  RouterA and RouterB are related through the ports series (T1) or dial-up connections (ISDN, POTS) and are never on the same ethernet connection.

  Intermediate links between RouterA and RouterB change regularly and frequently in my portable environment.

  When I apply a cryptographic card to an ethernet port, it seems to crash the router, part of the traffic goes thru, but I lose telnet.

  I use 2520 s and 4500's

  Any ideas?

  Thank you

  Mark Matthias CCNA, CNA, CNE, MCP

  The card encryption should be applied to the port outgoing (port facing the other peer router). You apply the encryption card to T1 and ISDN/POTS interfaces and define your ACL crypto to encrypt traffic between subnets ethernet.

• Card crypto controls lock-up PIX 525

  Does anyone know why my PIX 525 crashes when I apply my a cryptomap both command line? I first apply the following ACL. But when I try to apply the first line of cryptomap my PIX locks and I have to restart... Any help would be greatly appreciated >

  permit access ip xx.xx.0.0 255.192.0.0 list XXXXXtunnel xx.xx.18.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed sheep xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0 xx.xx.0.0 ip

  allowed to access-list acl-inner ip xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 xx.xx.xx.0

  xxx_map 157 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto xxx_map 157 correspondence address xxx-tunnel

  card crypto xxx_map 157 counterpart set xx.4.xx.xx

  card crypto xxx_map 157 transform-set xxx_set

  Hello

  I came across this problem when there are other entries already exist under the same crypto map, and are already applied to an interface.

  I found that by denying first crypto map interface command, change the config and re - apply the interface command then it will work very well.

  So...

  (1) no xxx_map interface card crypto outside

  (2) place the lines of crypto map configuration

  (3) interface xxx_map crypto map out

  Of course, you will lose the existing tunnels if some already set up but then this happens if you reboot anyway!

  It may be useful

• Card Crypto GETVPN on loopback

  Hello

  We have 6 WAN routers connected through MPLS ISP cloud, we must apply GET VPN between these WAN routers.

  We have 2 servers of keys (1800 routers), and WAN routers will act as members of the Group (6 GMs)

  The configuration files are attached for work typical configuration GETVPN (crypto map applied to the WAN interface)

  In the key server configuration, the crypto isakmp command uses the WAN IP of each router WAN (172.16.x.x) address, and since KS routers are connected to the local network (VSS), they should be able to join 172.16.X.X and therefore the subnet in 172.16.X.X is announced for the local network (check GM-configuration file under eigrp - connected redist)

  That's what our customers want to avoid! they don't want 172.16.X.X to make advertising for the local network.

  I know it's possible in the configuration GETVPN to configure, the command crypto isakmp for use the loopback address of the routers WAN instead of the WAN IP address, but in this case the card encryption should be applied to address loopback, and for this, all traffic to be encrypted and decrypted to go through the loopback on all routers WAN interfaces.

  I was wondering what is the best solution in this case, I have to use the config below on GM

  card crypto-address loopback 0
  

  TEST allowed 10 route map

  set interface Loopback0

  TEST IP policy route map-local

  But I don't know if it is correct, or there may be a better idea... so I thought share with you guys to discuss all the best ideas.

  Ali,

  We do not support cryptographic cards on loopback interfaces.

  Use the crypto-local address (in the case of vanilla IPsec) card or customer record interface (even if it is for another use) order under specifcy gdoi what inetrface or VRF you want to record source to / receive to generate a new key on.

  You can take a look at DIG:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6525/ps9370/ps7180/GETVPN_DIG_version_1_0_External.PDF

  section 4.2.1.2.3 and other talk.

  M.

• How a GRE tunnel is applied to a physical interface?

  Within the tunnel configuration, we use the controls, the source and destination for the tunnel, but the physical interface does he know how to use the tunnel? The source code of the tunnel parameters replace the physical interface? If we don't configure a tunnel with the right source this interface would then send all information encapsulated in the GRE?

  If we also configure IPSec on the interface, and specify a card encryption to encrypt only the corresponding traffic this corresponding traffic would not use the GREtunnel or information without worrying if it was encrypted IPSec is also be encapsulated in the GRE?

  Also, I read here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-3067

  'Bind the card crypto to Physics (outside) interface if you are using the version of Cisco IOS 12.2.15 software or later. If not, then the card encryption should be applied to the tunnel as well as the physical interface interface. »

  Why was it necessary to apply the crypto map to both physical and tunnel interfaces, and why is it not necessary with versions of IOS?

  Thanks for any help!  -Mark

  Hi Mark,

  When you set the source of the tunnel in the tunnel interface, the router adds the IP address of the specific interface (loopback or physical) to the GRE packet generated by the tunnel interface.

  This is useful when you need to deliver a tunnel through the Internet WILL, but the tunnel interface has an IP of priivate, if you use the interface external (with a public IP address) as the source of the tunnel.

  When remote endpoint WILL receive the packet, search interface tunnel there as destination of the tunnel and decaps the packets, and then he gets the GRE packet and forwards it to the specific tunnel interface.

  Since 12.4 you simply apply the crypto map to the interface defined as the' tunnel', usually the one connected to the Internet, where all VPN tunnels are landed. The reason for this is the endpoint VPN termination being the physical and not the tunnel interface interface.

  The reason why you need to add the encryption card for both is not clear for me, since I did not support older versions of code.

  Do not forget that when configuring a GRE/IPsec tunnel in ACL Cryptography you set the source and tunnel destination IPs.

  Hoping to help.

  Portu.

  Please note all useful posts

  Post edited by: Javier Portuguez

• Card crypto has incomplete registration message

  I'm working on the construction of a configuration on a 5540 running 9.1.2 for VPN L2L.  When I reboot the device, I get this message:

  . ATTENTION: card crypto has incomplete registrations

  Out of config line 10665, 'card crypto L2LVPN interfaces... ". »

  I seems that it gives me the error on the line where the encryption card is assigned to the external interface.  Unfortunately, this message is really not very useful.  I don't have it still in production. Is there a way that I can know where my problem maybe?

  Thank you.

  Jason

  Hello

  This indicates generally only a connection VPN L2L Crypto map configuration is missing a crucial parameter to make it complete.

  Then run the command

  See the crypto run map

  Then make sure the following lines exist

  address for correspondence card crypto

  card crypto defined peer

  set transform-set ikev1 crypto card

  If one of the 3 things mentioned above is missing then crypto map configuration is considered incomplete and does not have the information necessary for this VPN L2L to function.

  At least that is what it seems.

  It may be useful

  -Jouni

• How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use?

   ip access-list extended ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 permit ip 10.0.12.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.22.0 0.0.0.255 ! crypto isakmp policy 10 encr aes hash sha256 authentication pre-share group 14 crypto isakmp policy 20 encr aes 256 hash sha512 authentication pre-share group 16 crypto isakmp key cisco123 address 200.0.2.2 ! crypto ipsec transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 esp-aes esp-sha256-hmac mode tunnel ! crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2 11 ipsec-isakmp set peer 200.0.2.2 set transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 match address ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2

  How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use, or use of the ISAKMP policy at all?

  It comes from "ipsec-isakmp?

  I mean... I do not see any "set isakmp policy 10" in the Crypto map

  This is what he chooses just the top-down approach?

  As part of the negotiation of the phase 1 and is a top-down proposal based on the sequence number.  You can get the details in tunnel using configuration:

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  Cisco IOS has built/strategies default ISAKMP, but the pre 15.x versions were terrible default.  New default values are strong, although I still like to configure them myself.

• card crypto access lists / problem if more than one entry?

  Access list for IPSec enabled traffic.

  I've been recently setting up a VPN between two sites and I came across the following problem:

  I wanted to install a VPN that only 2 posts from site A to site B, a class C network

  So I created a list of access as follows:

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.2 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  When I applied the access list above to map (match address 101) encryption, I quickly realized that only the first host (192.168.0.1) was successfully encrypted beeing while the other could not. I've been geeting on ipsec debugging errors saying that traffic to 192.168.0.2 denyed by the access list.

  When I changed the access list above with the following

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  two items of work could successfully encrypted through IPSec tunnel.

  To look further into it, I realized that only the first entry of the IPsec access list has been really tested for the corresponding traffic!

  Is this a normal behavior or a known Bug? No work around for this problem?

  Kind regards.

  If you have ipsec-manual crypto map in crypto ACL, you can specify that an ACE. Check 12.2 docs:

  Access lists for labelled as ipsec-manual crypto map entries are limited to a single permit entry and the following entries are ignored. In other words, the security associations established by this particular entry card crypto are only for a single data stream. To be able to support several manually created security for different types of traffic associations, define multiple crypto access lists and then apply each a separate entrance card crypto ipsec-manual. Each access list should include a statement to define which traffic to protect.

• Card crypto withdrawing after reloading

  Hello

  I've just set up my site to site vpn with a tot Inbox pix and a cisco 3745.

  The pix box is good, but the 3745 every time I reload the card encryption is not applied to the interface after recharging.

  Hello

  I strongly suspect that this could be a bug in IOS on your 3745.

  try to update the IOS and test again.

  Search for bug

  CSCeb20989