Card crypto on Interface Ethernet

Similar Questions

• Area-based-Firewall: card crypto / tunnel interface / area?

  Hello

  We use a router CISCO1921-SEC. On the side "WAN", we have 1 public IP assigned by DHCP address.

  At present, we use the WAN Interface with a crypto-map as endpoint of some IPSec connections. We have created a zone - fire-with area "WAN" and "LAN". In this configuration, all IPSec parameters are on a single Interface - connection to the 'LAN' box can be managed through rulesets. What about the connections between IPSec connections and the area "self."

  We would like to finish each IPSec connection in a separate area. Is this a good idea?

  How can this be configured?

  Each of them on a "inetface tunnel" with binding "tunnel source...". » ?

  Please give us a clue... Thank you!!

  Message geändert durch NISITNETC

  When the tunnels are completed on the router, which is the area free, by default, all traffic is allowed, if you want to restrict access, you must create a free zone and add a pair of WAN area to auto.

  Hope this link will help you,

  http://INKLING/?q=node/1305

• Card crypto has incomplete registration message

  I'm working on the construction of a configuration on a 5540 running 9.1.2 for VPN L2L.  When I reboot the device, I get this message:

  . ATTENTION: card crypto has incomplete registrations

  Out of config line 10665, 'card crypto L2LVPN interfaces... ". »

  I seems that it gives me the error on the line where the encryption card is assigned to the external interface.  Unfortunately, this message is really not very useful.  I don't have it still in production. Is there a way that I can know where my problem maybe?

  Thank you.

  Jason

  Hello

  This indicates generally only a connection VPN L2L Crypto map configuration is missing a crucial parameter to make it complete.

  Then run the command

  See the crypto run map

  Then make sure the following lines exist

  address for correspondence card crypto

  card crypto defined peer

  set transform-set ikev1 crypto card

  If one of the 3 things mentioned above is missing then crypto map configuration is considered incomplete and does not have the information necessary for this VPN L2L to function.

  At least that is what it seems.

  It may be useful

  -Jouni

• Dynamic crypto several cards on the interface

  I have an ASA 5540 executes code 8.2. The firewall has tunnels, VPNS, IPSec standard on this remote access VPN and SSL VPN without client.

  I have 1921 Cisco routers with 4 G wireless cards must open dynamic VPN with the ASA 5540, so it seems that I need to implement a solution of EzVPN here.

  My question is, multiple dynamic crypto maps are supported on a single interface?

  For example, the current configuration of lists

  PFS set 20 crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map Group 1

  Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  In addition to cryptographic cards for static L2L tunnels.

  I guess when I add the EzVPN I have to create a new dynamic map. After having done that, simply add something like that?

  card crypto outside_map 65534 ipsec isakmp dynamic outside_new_map

  Basically a different sequence number and card name?

  Hi Colin,

  It is fundamentally correct, that you will encounter some problems on incoming connections, two on the external interface dynamic crypto map entries.

  One possibility would be to include a return address for correspondence for you EZ - VPN, for example, generously describe the Remote LAN as the destination of the encryption access list.

  For example if your remote LAN is all within the range 10.66.0.0/16 set up an access as list:

  outside_new [local area network] ip access list allow [local mask] 10.66.0.0 255.255.0.0

  and include it in you card crypto dynamic outside_new_map

  PFS set 20 crypto dynamic-map outside_new_map Group 1

  Crypto-map dynamic outside_new_map 20 the value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  crypto dynamic-map outside_new_map 20 the value corresponds to the address outside_new

  See also:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/IKE.html#wp1042880

• seized correspondence interface card crypto

  I wonder if I put the command 'ip nat outside' to my external interface required before entering the cryto entry card "card crypto map name of the command?

  concerning

  Not necessary unless you're natting. Where the order will be as shown below

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml

• How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use?

   ip access-list extended ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 permit ip 10.0.12.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.22.0 0.0.0.255 ! crypto isakmp policy 10 encr aes hash sha256 authentication pre-share group 14 crypto isakmp policy 20 encr aes 256 hash sha512 authentication pre-share group 16 crypto isakmp key cisco123 address 200.0.2.2 ! crypto ipsec transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 esp-aes esp-sha256-hmac mode tunnel ! crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2 11 ipsec-isakmp set peer 200.0.2.2 set transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 match address ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2

  How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use, or use of the ISAKMP policy at all?

  It comes from "ipsec-isakmp?

  I mean... I do not see any "set isakmp policy 10" in the Crypto map

  This is what he chooses just the top-down approach?

  As part of the negotiation of the phase 1 and is a top-down proposal based on the sequence number.  You can get the details in tunnel using configuration:

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  Cisco IOS has built/strategies default ISAKMP, but the pre 15.x versions were terrible default.  New default values are strong, although I still like to configure them myself.

• Card crypto controls lock-up PIX 525

  Does anyone know why my PIX 525 crashes when I apply my a cryptomap both command line? I first apply the following ACL. But when I try to apply the first line of cryptomap my PIX locks and I have to restart... Any help would be greatly appreciated >

  permit access ip xx.xx.0.0 255.192.0.0 list XXXXXtunnel xx.xx.18.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed sheep xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0 xx.xx.0.0 ip

  allowed to access-list acl-inner ip xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 xx.xx.xx.0

  xxx_map 157 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto xxx_map 157 correspondence address xxx-tunnel

  card crypto xxx_map 157 counterpart set xx.4.xx.xx

  card crypto xxx_map 157 transform-set xxx_set

  Hello

  I came across this problem when there are other entries already exist under the same crypto map, and are already applied to an interface.

  I found that by denying first crypto map interface command, change the config and re - apply the interface command then it will work very well.

  So...

  (1) no xxx_map interface card crypto outside

  (2) place the lines of crypto map configuration

  (3) interface xxx_map crypto map out

  Of course, you will lose the existing tunnels if some already set up but then this happens if you reboot anyway!

  It may be useful

• Card Crypto GETVPN on loopback

  Hello

  We have 6 WAN routers connected through MPLS ISP cloud, we must apply GET VPN between these WAN routers.

  We have 2 servers of keys (1800 routers), and WAN routers will act as members of the Group (6 GMs)

  The configuration files are attached for work typical configuration GETVPN (crypto map applied to the WAN interface)

  In the key server configuration, the crypto isakmp command uses the WAN IP of each router WAN (172.16.x.x) address, and since KS routers are connected to the local network (VSS), they should be able to join 172.16.X.X and therefore the subnet in 172.16.X.X is announced for the local network (check GM-configuration file under eigrp - connected redist)

  That's what our customers want to avoid! they don't want 172.16.X.X to make advertising for the local network.

  I know it's possible in the configuration GETVPN to configure, the command crypto isakmp for use the loopback address of the routers WAN instead of the WAN IP address, but in this case the card encryption should be applied to address loopback, and for this, all traffic to be encrypted and decrypted to go through the loopback on all routers WAN interfaces.

  I was wondering what is the best solution in this case, I have to use the config below on GM

  card crypto-address loopback 0
  

  TEST allowed 10 route map

  set interface Loopback0

  TEST IP policy route map-local

  But I don't know if it is correct, or there may be a better idea... so I thought share with you guys to discuss all the best ideas.

  Ali,

  We do not support cryptographic cards on loopback interfaces.

  Use the crypto-local address (in the case of vanilla IPsec) card or customer record interface (even if it is for another use) order under specifcy gdoi what inetrface or VRF you want to record source to / receive to generate a new key on.

  You can take a look at DIG:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6525/ps9370/ps7180/GETVPN_DIG_version_1_0_External.PDF

  section 4.2.1.2.3 and other talk.

  M.

• PCI-6025E (DAQ) and cards-1409 (Image Interface) PCI

  Hi friends,

  I have PCI-6025E (DAQ) and cards-1409 (Image Interface) PCI installed on the Windows XP desktop, that connected to the deducted Mikron camera.

  Recently I spend my Labview to 8.6, but the Mikron camera installation software does not work.

  How can I solve the problem?

  Anyone have the installation software (PCI-6025E (DAQ) and cards-1409 (Image Interface) PCI)?

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Jack

  jackp6,

  For the 6205E you will need to download an install the Drivers OR-DAQmx which you can find here:

  NOR-DAQmx

  http://Joule.NI.com/nidu/CDs/view/p/ID/2214/lang/en

  The 1409, you must NEITHER IMAQ drivers that are included in the following the Acquisition of vision available here:

  NEITHER Vision Acquisition Software 2,010.08

  http://Joule.NI.com/nidu/CDs/view/p/ID/2137/lang/en

  Please let us know if you have any other questions.

  Kind regards

  Sam K

  Technical sales engineer

  National systems

• card crypto access lists / problem if more than one entry?

  Access list for IPSec enabled traffic.

  I've been recently setting up a VPN between two sites and I came across the following problem:

  I wanted to install a VPN that only 2 posts from site A to site B, a class C network

  So I created a list of access as follows:

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.2 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  When I applied the access list above to map (match address 101) encryption, I quickly realized that only the first host (192.168.0.1) was successfully encrypted beeing while the other could not. I've been geeting on ipsec debugging errors saying that traffic to 192.168.0.2 denyed by the access list.

  When I changed the access list above with the following

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  two items of work could successfully encrypted through IPSec tunnel.

  To look further into it, I realized that only the first entry of the IPsec access list has been really tested for the corresponding traffic!

  Is this a normal behavior or a known Bug? No work around for this problem?

  Kind regards.

  If you have ipsec-manual crypto map in crypto ACL, you can specify that an ACE. Check 12.2 docs:

  Access lists for labelled as ipsec-manual crypto map entries are limited to a single permit entry and the following entries are ignored. In other words, the security associations established by this particular entry card crypto are only for a single data stream. To be able to support several manually created security for different types of traffic associations, define multiple crypto access lists and then apply each a separate entrance card crypto ipsec-manual. Each access list should include a statement to define which traffic to protect.

• Card crypto applied to the Vlan Interface of the 1841 router

  Currently, our 1841 router has a T1 connected to the WIC T1, Comcast Cable connected to Fa0/0 and the local network connected to Fa0/1.  Tuesday, our 1841 will have an ethernet connection to a new gateway router instead of use the WIC T1.  I added a 4-port ethernet module to the router in the anticipation of this change.  Since the 4-port module is not layer 3 capable, I created a virtual local area network so that I can address the Vlan with the IP address that has been previously configured on the WIC T1.  My goal is to move our IPSec vpn tunnel interface series interface vlan newly created.  I was able to add all orders of the interface vlan, but I wanted to make sure that when the time comes to make the transition, the tunnel will be actually get when it is configured on an interface vlan that is then assigned to one of the four ethernet ports in the add-on.  Has anyone done this or seen that fact?  Potential drawbacks?  Thank you very much!

  Hello

  Crypto-map is compatible with the IVR, so if everything else is in place, it does not work.

  HTH

  Laurent.

• Encryption: "Apply crypto map interface.

  East - the best forum to discuss encryption?

  I want to implement a single aes encryption between an ISDN Bri1/0 port on a 2611xm and a 2811.

  I want to encrypt everything except telnet on the ISDN link between these routers. I want to telent between routers just in case the encryption locks himself. This is my requirement of customers.

  Question #1: Should I contact the card encryption the Ethernet port (as I have seen in many examples) or on the ISDN connection?

  Question #2: If I ask the encryption card to the ISDN connection, should I do the encryption the BRI port card or the dialer?

  Question #3: Assuming that both routers and all segments use the 10.0.0.0 network and are not connected to what anyone else, the following access list would work?

  access list 110

  deny ip any eq telnet

  allow an ip

  Thank you

  Mark

  Hi Mark,

  Apply the card encryption to your outgoing interface (Dialer)

  You probably will lock the router by putting

  an ip address allowed any one in your crypto access list

  you have probably even to add telnet deny entry in your access list if you are ready to open your session to the router

  I suggest you

  extended to remote IP access list

  deny ip any eq telnet

  ip licensing 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255

  The remote site would have a mirror

  social-seat extended IP access list

  deny ip any eq telnet

  IP 10.0.2.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255

• My network card has disappeared - no Ethernet (EN0) more

  Hello

  This morning, no more Internet!

  After checking double connection cable & Wifi (ok) I realize only the system Pref > network will not appear 'Ethernet' choices in the list as pop up when you try to create a new Interface!

  I run the network utility > news and no more Ethernet (EN0).

  ???

  Thanks for the tips

  After a telephone support call, now I'm reinstalling OS X, is the only solution.

  Time Machine restore does not work.

  After 1 h 46' I tell you if the problem is resolved...

• I run xp coffeehouse get an icon remove the device safely. I check it and it is for a card broadcom netlink gigabit ethernet which can not be deleted

  I run xp family on a computer laptop hp compaq 6510 b.  The broadcom netlink gigabit ethernet adapter is part of my motherboard.  Why do it and can I get rid of him?

  Hello

  1 have had any changes made to the computer before the show?

  Restore the system to the date and time when the computer was working fine.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/306084

  If this message has always been to present its likely that the Ethernet card that is built into the computer is connected to the motherboard using a USB connection (this is common in laptops). If this is the case, there is nothing that can be done to remove the message that the deactivation of the Ethernet card, but this will prevent you from being able to use wired Internet/network connections.

• Question card crypto for VPN gateway router

  I'm moving my VPN environment at 2811 routers. I move a seller more tomorrow which has two sources who need to connect to each of our IPs, those inside the IPs are NAT had real IPS at the firewall behind the router. I know I'll find out tomorrow, but thought I would see if anyone see a problem with this ACL that is used for the encryption card, is there a problem with multiple sources (50.50.50.1 et.2 in file) connection to the same destinations? The IP addresses in this file are not real output IPs. Thank you.

  If I understand you correctly, no it should not be a problem at all. Each entry in your crypto ACLs card will create a separate IPSEC security association pair and there is no overlap.

  Let me know if I misunderstood your question.

  Jon