Card Crypto GETVPN on loopback

Similar Questions

• Card crypto has incomplete registration message

  I'm working on the construction of a configuration on a 5540 running 9.1.2 for VPN L2L.  When I reboot the device, I get this message:

  . ATTENTION: card crypto has incomplete registrations

  Out of config line 10665, 'card crypto L2LVPN interfaces... ". »

  I seems that it gives me the error on the line where the encryption card is assigned to the external interface.  Unfortunately, this message is really not very useful.  I don't have it still in production. Is there a way that I can know where my problem maybe?

  Thank you.

  Jason

  Hello

  This indicates generally only a connection VPN L2L Crypto map configuration is missing a crucial parameter to make it complete.

  Then run the command

  See the crypto run map

  Then make sure the following lines exist

  address for correspondence card crypto

  card crypto defined peer

  set transform-set ikev1 crypto card

  If one of the 3 things mentioned above is missing then crypto map configuration is considered incomplete and does not have the information necessary for this VPN L2L to function.

  At least that is what it seems.

  It may be useful

  -Jouni

• How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use?

   ip access-list extended ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 permit ip 10.0.12.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.22.0 0.0.0.255 ! crypto isakmp policy 10 encr aes hash sha256 authentication pre-share group 14 crypto isakmp policy 20 encr aes 256 hash sha512 authentication pre-share group 16 crypto isakmp key cisco123 address 200.0.2.2 ! crypto ipsec transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 esp-aes esp-sha256-hmac mode tunnel ! crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2 11 ipsec-isakmp set peer 200.0.2.2 set transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 match address ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2

  How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use, or use of the ISAKMP policy at all?

  It comes from "ipsec-isakmp?

  I mean... I do not see any "set isakmp policy 10" in the Crypto map

  This is what he chooses just the top-down approach?

  As part of the negotiation of the phase 1 and is a top-down proposal based on the sequence number.  You can get the details in tunnel using configuration:

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  Cisco IOS has built/strategies default ISAKMP, but the pre 15.x versions were terrible default.  New default values are strong, although I still like to configure them myself.

• Card crypto controls lock-up PIX 525

  Does anyone know why my PIX 525 crashes when I apply my a cryptomap both command line? I first apply the following ACL. But when I try to apply the first line of cryptomap my PIX locks and I have to restart... Any help would be greatly appreciated >

  permit access ip xx.xx.0.0 255.192.0.0 list XXXXXtunnel xx.xx.18.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed sheep xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0 xx.xx.0.0 ip

  allowed to access-list acl-inner ip xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 xx.xx.xx.0

  xxx_map 157 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto xxx_map 157 correspondence address xxx-tunnel

  card crypto xxx_map 157 counterpart set xx.4.xx.xx

  card crypto xxx_map 157 transform-set xxx_set

  Hello

  I came across this problem when there are other entries already exist under the same crypto map, and are already applied to an interface.

  I found that by denying first crypto map interface command, change the config and re - apply the interface command then it will work very well.

  So...

  (1) no xxx_map interface card crypto outside

  (2) place the lines of crypto map configuration

  (3) interface xxx_map crypto map out

  Of course, you will lose the existing tunnels if some already set up but then this happens if you reboot anyway!

  It may be useful

• card crypto access lists / problem if more than one entry?

  Access list for IPSec enabled traffic.

  I've been recently setting up a VPN between two sites and I came across the following problem:

  I wanted to install a VPN that only 2 posts from site A to site B, a class C network

  So I created a list of access as follows:

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.2 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  When I applied the access list above to map (match address 101) encryption, I quickly realized that only the first host (192.168.0.1) was successfully encrypted beeing while the other could not. I've been geeting on ipsec debugging errors saying that traffic to 192.168.0.2 denyed by the access list.

  When I changed the access list above with the following

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  two items of work could successfully encrypted through IPSec tunnel.

  To look further into it, I realized that only the first entry of the IPsec access list has been really tested for the corresponding traffic!

  Is this a normal behavior or a known Bug? No work around for this problem?

  Kind regards.

  If you have ipsec-manual crypto map in crypto ACL, you can specify that an ACE. Check 12.2 docs:

  Access lists for labelled as ipsec-manual crypto map entries are limited to a single permit entry and the following entries are ignored. In other words, the security associations established by this particular entry card crypto are only for a single data stream. To be able to support several manually created security for different types of traffic associations, define multiple crypto access lists and then apply each a separate entrance card crypto ipsec-manual. Each access list should include a statement to define which traffic to protect.

• seized correspondence interface card crypto

  I wonder if I put the command 'ip nat outside' to my external interface required before entering the cryto entry card "card crypto map name of the command?

  concerning

  Not necessary unless you're natting. Where the order will be as shown below

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml

• Question card crypto for VPN gateway router

  I'm moving my VPN environment at 2811 routers. I move a seller more tomorrow which has two sources who need to connect to each of our IPs, those inside the IPs are NAT had real IPS at the firewall behind the router. I know I'll find out tomorrow, but thought I would see if anyone see a problem with this ACL that is used for the encryption card, is there a problem with multiple sources (50.50.50.1 et.2 in file) connection to the same destinations? The IP addresses in this file are not real output IPs. Thank you.

  If I understand you correctly, no it should not be a problem at all. Each entry in your crypto ACLs card will create a separate IPSEC security association pair and there is no overlap.

  Let me know if I misunderstood your question.

  Jon

• card crypto VPN 270 defined peer 12.2.3.4 12.5.6.7

  All the

  Previously tunnel setup has (2) ip addresses defined in the crypto map. I was informed that one of the ip is no longer valid.

  Can I remove one of the ip without losing the other?

  no VPN 270 crypto card not defined peer 12.2.3.4

  Yes you can.

  Thank you

• Card crypto on Interface Ethernet

  Hi all

  I don't have that much experience but with VPN configs, so maybe this question will seem a bit silly. I have a Cisco 831 that I use to connect via VPN to a remote site. Everything works fine.

  Then I wanted to add a second tunnel to another location. I did all the configs needed, applied card encryption on ethernet external and everything was fine, I could connect. But then I noticed that the new encryption card has actually replaced the existing one. Of course, the first VPN was no longer works.

  Is this a limitation of the 831? Or y at - it another way to configure them so I can use the two (or even more than two) at the same time? Do I need another Cisco router if I want more than a tunnel?

  Any help is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Stefan

  This isn't a limitation of the router. But by design,.

  only one crypto map set can be assigned to an interface. If multiple crypto map entries have the same name but a different seq - num map, they are considered as part of the same set, and all apply to the interface.

  So what you need to do is create crypto-map with the same name for slot 2, but give a different sequence number. Apply this encryption card to the interface and it will work. From the seq - num lowest crypto card is considered to be the highest priority, and will be evaluated first.

• Area-based-Firewall: card crypto / tunnel interface / area?

  Hello

  We use a router CISCO1921-SEC. On the side "WAN", we have 1 public IP assigned by DHCP address.

  At present, we use the WAN Interface with a crypto-map as endpoint of some IPSec connections. We have created a zone - fire-with area "WAN" and "LAN". In this configuration, all IPSec parameters are on a single Interface - connection to the 'LAN' box can be managed through rulesets. What about the connections between IPSec connections and the area "self."

  We would like to finish each IPSec connection in a separate area. Is this a good idea?

  How can this be configured?

  Each of them on a "inetface tunnel" with binding "tunnel source...". » ?

  Please give us a clue... Thank you!!

  Message geändert durch NISITNETC

  When the tunnels are completed on the router, which is the area free, by default, all traffic is allowed, if you want to restrict access, you must create a free zone and add a pair of WAN area to auto.

  Hope this link will help you,

  http://INKLING/?q=node/1305

• Card crypto applied to the Vlan Interface of the 1841 router

  Currently, our 1841 router has a T1 connected to the WIC T1, Comcast Cable connected to Fa0/0 and the local network connected to Fa0/1.  Tuesday, our 1841 will have an ethernet connection to a new gateway router instead of use the WIC T1.  I added a 4-port ethernet module to the router in the anticipation of this change.  Since the 4-port module is not layer 3 capable, I created a virtual local area network so that I can address the Vlan with the IP address that has been previously configured on the WIC T1.  My goal is to move our IPSec vpn tunnel interface series interface vlan newly created.  I was able to add all orders of the interface vlan, but I wanted to make sure that when the time comes to make the transition, the tunnel will be actually get when it is configured on an interface vlan that is then assigned to one of the four ethernet ports in the add-on.  Has anyone done this or seen that fact?  Potential drawbacks?  Thank you very much!

  Hello

  Crypto-map is compatible with the IVR, so if everything else is in place, it does not work.

  HTH

  Laurent.

• Card crypto withdrawing after reloading

  Hello

  I've just set up my site to site vpn with a tot Inbox pix and a cisco 3745.

  The pix box is good, but the 3745 every time I reload the card encryption is not applied to the interface after recharging.

  Hello

  I strongly suspect that this could be a bug in IOS on your 3745.

  try to update the IOS and test again.

  Search for bug

  CSCeb20989

• ISAKMP does not start after charging

  Hello world:

  We have a router Cisco 1841, acting as a member of the group in a GETVPN network. When this router reloads, ISAKMP process remains always OFF (% CRYPTO-6-ISAKMP_ON_OFF: ISAKMP is DISABLED) and only begin this process until we have forced through a command clear crypto gdoi or manually turn the off/on card crypto on the interface, if Phase 1 never start and the GM never register on KS. Other members of the group in the network does not have this problem and is the same ISAKMP policy and configuration of GDOI.

  All routers in the nerwork have the same IOS (C1841-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4 (15) T8, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc3)) but this problem is only present on a router.

  a debug crypto isakmp has been issued on the weird router but it didn't show any information because ISAKMP is stuck. After we order clearly crypto gdoi, ISAKMP begins the negotiation and authentication and the SA is finally established.

  It's the router log after you issue a reload command:

  * Jan 27 10:51:44.695: % SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted.
  Cisco IOS Software, 1841 (C1841-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4 (15) T8, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc3)
  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
  Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Updated Tuesday 1st December 08 13:52 by prod_rel_team
  * Jan 27 10:51:44.699: % SNMP-5-start COLD: SNMP agent on host XXXXXXXX is the subject of a cold start
  * Jan 27 10:51:44.763: % SSH-5-ACTIVATED: 1.99 SSH has been activated
  * Jan 27 10:51:44.919: % CRYPTO-6-ISAKMP_ON_OFF: ISAKMP is DISABLED
  * Jan 27 10:51:44.919: % CRYPTO-6-GDOI_ON_OFF: GDOI is set to OFF
  * Jan 27 10:51:44.919: % CRYPTO-6-GDOI_ON_OFF: GDOI is running
  * Jan 27 10:51:45.999: % SYS-6-DISTRIBUTION: time required to restart after reloading = 130 seconds

  It is the configuration of encryption

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA 3des
  Group 2
  !
  !
  gdoi crypto group GETVPN
  Identity number 10
  Server address ipv4 a.b.c.d
  Server ipv4 x.y.z.x address
  !
  !
  card crypto GETVPN-map local-address FastEthernet0/1
  card crypto GETVPN-card 10 gdoi
  set the GETVPN group

  Thanks in advance.

  Damian

  Hello

  There is a known issue with GETVPN resolved in 12.4 (15) T10:

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsv29424

  This causes the router does not save with the KS after a reload. However, it is specific to a configuration GETVPN, what 12.4 mainline code does not support. I suggest that you open a TAC case for studying it.

  Thank you

  Wen

• Crypto applied on the loopback interface

  Hello

  Here's one of our 2811 router config, we applied crypto on the loopback interface, but its does not work. Can you review the cofig and let us know the suggesstion as elsewhere where we can apply crypto map to VPN to work.

  site #sh run

  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 5956 bytes

  !

  version 12.4

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  encryption password service

  !

  Site host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  enable secret cisco

  !

  No aaa new-model

  !

  resources policy

  !

  iomem 25 memory size

  clock timezone IS - 5

  clock to summer time EDT recurring

  No network-clock-participate wic 2

  No network-clock-participate wic 3

  IP subnet zero

  !

  !

  IP cef

  No dhcp use connected vrf ip

  !

  controller T1 2/0/0

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  controller T1 0/2/1

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  controller T1 3/0/0

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  controller T1 3/0/1

  framing ESF

  linecode b8zs

  CableLength short-133

  slots of channel-group 0 1 - 24

  !

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  ISAKMP crypto key wsld0829 address 66.78.246.175

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac rtpset

  !

  RTP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined by peer 66.78.246.175

  Set transform-set rtpset

  match address 110

  !

  !

  !

  interface Loopback0

  Description * IP address links multiple serial lines *.

  IP 168.88.110.200 255.255.255.252

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/0/0

  Description * Sprint HCGS/987682 / / LB *.

  no ip address

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/1/0

  Description * Sprint HCGS/987683 / / LB *.

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  interface Serial0/2/0:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/2/1:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  crypto rtp map

  !

  interface Serial0/3/0:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  Shutdown

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  interface Serial0/3/1:0

  no ip address

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  no ip redirection

  no ip unreachable

  encapsulation ppp

  Shutdown

  no fair queue

  pulse-time 1

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  interface virtual-Template1

  IP unnumbered Loopback0

  multilink PPP Panel

  !

  IP classless

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 160.81.110.209

  IP route 200.3.201.0 255.255.255.0 207.40.33.100

  IP route 203.13.189.0 255.255.255.0 207.40.33.100

  !

  IP http server

  no ip http secure server

  !

  Note access-list 110 Tunnel ACL

  access-list 110 note authorization router loopback

  access-list 110 permit ip 168.88.110.200 host 67.210.111.204 0.0.0.15

  access-list 110 note IP3 allowing

  access-list 110 permit ip 207.41.32.106 host 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  access-110 note peripheral authorization

  access-list 110 permit ip 208.3.187.0 0.0.0.15 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  access-list 110 permit ip 208.3.187.16 0.0.0.7 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  access-list 110 permit ip 208.3.187.24 0.0.0.1 65.210.126.240 0.0.0.15

  Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  Line con 0

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  Cisco password

  local connection

  !

  end

  Your suggestion will be highly appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Khan

  1: try to add the following command in your router.

  Panel MultiLink virtual-model 1

  2: set 'crypt map rtp' command in virtual model 1 void-configuation.

  3: remove 'crypt map rtp' command of all the interface configuration and closure of the serial interface.

  4: highly recommended to remove the following command from each serial interface.

  Check IP unicast reverse path

  5: If still does not work, apply new 'crypt card rtp"command in all interfaces of Seraglio under configuration.

  Jerry

• Cisco 877 - issue crypto card

  We have implemented a L2L VPN between a cisco 877 and an ASA 5505.

  On the side of 877, we have:

  Dialer 0: connect to the internet and has a dynamic IP given by ISP

  Loopback1: has a static IP address of the public IP range assigned.

  VLAN 1: has a static private IP address for the local network

  FE3: Interface conencted to lan

  We have the following problem.

  We have applied the card encryption to the loopback interface and with this configuration we can reach the interface of the internal router (VLAN 1 IP) from the internal network of ASA, but except that we cannot reach any host inside the router's lan.

  If we apply the encryption card to the interface of FE3 we can ping also lan internal but we lose half of the ping and the return is high (500-800 ms applies rather than 70 to 80 when only 1 Loopback)

  So I need some help here. What should be the correct configuration to have it all works well?

  Thanks in advance

  In the first configuration (crypto-map applied to the loopback interface), you can try this:

  no ip (on Cisco 877) cef

  CEF in many versions have similar problems of your of