Certificate authority certificate: status = FAIL, length cert = 0

Hi all

We installed the new authority root MS certification and certification (Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise) in the test environment. When I tried to get the certificate of the CA of some Cisco devices (router 1800, ASA 5510 5520), it failed. It's the same situation with "application url" or a "terminal entry" command:

Router:

Authenticate the PKI-test (config) #crypto ca NIS_CA
% Error in receiving the certificate of the CA: status = FAIL, length cert = 0

PKI-test (config) #.
23 Nov 16:17:01.764: CRYPTO_PKI: CA certificate request:
GET /certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll/pkiclient.exe?operation=GetCACert&message=NIS_CA HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Cisco PKI)
Host: xxxxxx

23 Nov 16:17:01.768: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint locked NIS_CA, refcount is 1
23 Nov 16:17:01.768: CRYPTO_PKI: open http connection
23 Nov 16:17:01.768: CRYPTO_PKI: HTTP send message

23 Nov 16:17:01.768: CRYPTO_PKI: HTTP response header:
HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Cisco PKI)
Host: xxxxxxx

23 Nov 16:17:01.772: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint unlocked NIS_CA, refcount is 0
23 Nov 16:17:01.772: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint locked NIS_CA, refcount is 1
23 Nov 16:17:01.776: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint unlocked NIS_CA, refcount is 0
23 Nov 16:17:01.776: CRYPTO_PKI: HTTP response header:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 5810
Content-Type: application/x - x 509-ca-ra-cert
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 16:17:01 GMT
Connection: close

Content-Type indicates that we have received certificates of CA and RA.

16:17:01.776 on 23 nov: CRYPTO_PKI:crypto_process_ca_ra_cert(trustpoint=NIS_CA)

16:17:01.788 on 23 nov: #7 message PKCS contains 4 certificates.
23 Nov 16:17:01.792: CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0 x 712 (E_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE_LEN: length of attribute value is not valid (% n0)): returned crypto_pkcs7_extract_ca_cert
23 Nov 16:17:01.792: CRYPTO_PKI: unable to read certificates of AC/AE.
16:17:01.792 on 23 nov: % ICP-3-GETCARACERT: did not have certificates of RA/CA.
23 Nov 16:17:01.792: CRYPTO_PKI: transaction completed GetCACert

ASA:

Authenticate the crypto ca ASA (config) # QLABCA

CRYPTO_PKI: HTTP response header:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 5810
Content-Type: application/x - x 509-ca-ra-cert
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Saturday, November 27, 2010 16:57:43 GMT
Connection: close

Content-Type indicates that we have received certificates of CA and RA.

CRYPTO_PKI:crypto_process_ca_ra_cert(Trustpoint=QLABCA)

crypto_certc_pkcs7_extract_certs_and_crls failed (1795):
crypto_certc_pkcs7_extract_certs_and_crls failed
Returned 1795 CRYPTO_PKI:crypto_pkcs7_extract_ca_cert

ERROR: receive the CA certificate: status = FAIL, length cert = 0

Is it possible that the Cisco devices don't support CA root public key length 4096 and subordinates CA 2048?

Or someone has another idea?

Thanks in advance...

Yes, this could be the problem.  ASA does not support the SHA2 as of yet.

-Jason

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • ERROR: receive the CA certificate: status = FAIL

    Hi all

    We installed the new authority MS root CA and (Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise) certification. When I tried to get the certificate of authority of some Cisco Cisco WS-C3560-24PS devices, it fails.

    Debug:

    QL - SW3 (config) #CRYPTO CA authenticate ESSAUDE

    092306: Mar 27 11:47:38.075 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: CA certificate request:
    GET /certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll/pkiclient.exe?operation=GetCACert&message=ESSAUDE HTTP/1.0
    User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Cisco PKI)
    Host: 10.0.4.2

    092307: Mar 27 11:47:38.075 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint locked ESSAUDE, refcount is 1
    092308: Mar 27 11:47:38.075 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: cannot resolve the server name/IP address
    092309: Mar 27 11:47:38.075 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: using 10.0.4.2 unresolved IP address
    092310: Mar 27 11:47:38.084 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: open http connection
    092311: Mar 27 11:47:38.084 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: HTTP send message

    092312: Mar 27 11:47:38.084 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: HTTP header:
    HTTP/1.0
    User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Cisco PKI)
    Host: 10.0.4.2

    092313: Mar 27 11:47:38.084 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint unlocked ESSAUDE, refcount is 0
    092314: Mar 27 11:47:38.084 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint locked ESSAUDE, refcount is 1
    % Error in receiving the certificate of the CA: status = FAIL, length cert = 0

    QL - SW3 (config) #.
    QL - SW3 (config) #.
    QL - SW3 (config) #.
    092315: Mar 27 11:47:53.393 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: trustpoint unlocked ESSAUDE, refcount is 0
    092316: Mar 27 11:47:53.393 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: HTTP header:
    HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
    Content-Type: text/html
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
    Date: Thu, 27 March 2014 11:47:53 GMT
    Connection: close
    Content-Length: 1208

    Content-Type indicates that we have not received a certificate.

    092317: Mar 27 11:47:53.401 PT: CRYPTO_PKI: transaction completed GetCACert
    QL - SW3 (config) #.

    Anyone have idea?

    concerning

    Looks like your CA server returns a 500 error.

    You can check this by accessing this URL (http://10.0.4.2/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll/pkiclient.exe?operation=GetCACert&message=ESSAUDE) using a browser. If it's all working, you should be able to download the certificate of the CA in this way (save it to, for example, ca.crt and try to open it).

    I am not sure, because I don't know how your CA is implemented, but I think that the registration URL you configured in your trustpoint on the switch might be wrong. It works on all devices, or is it just these switches of the problems?

    -hugh

  • Error: Tunnel research group using certificate cards failed for the peer certificate

    I have the research group of the Tunnel using certificate cards failed for peer certificate error when signing the SAA on my SSL VPN. I have the certificate installed on the client, I have no mapping of certificate created.

    I can map user certificate to a user name used to connect to the SSL VPN?

    Y at - it good documentation describing the certificate mapping?

    Off topic: I listen to a podcast of TAC security this week, and one of the members of the Group of experts preparing for an introduction to PKI to Networkers (I don't remember not the year). Videos of these presentations are available?

    Once more, I appreciate all the help.

    Triton

    Hello

    I guess the previous fill command comes in the webvpn under tunnel like this group attributes:

    tunnel-group test general attributes

    user name of certificate-CN

    tunnel-group test webvpn-attributes

    pre-fill-username-customer ssl

    No aaa authentication

    aaa authentication certificate

    You can also specify which field of the certificate you want to that username is taken.
    Users will be able to change the username (which beats the objective right?), but then they will not be able to connect using any other username. So if they change they will not be able to connect.
    Also, you can use the username to hide which will not allow users to change the user name it will be greyed out.
    And Yes, it's essentially a double authentication coz we use the certs and aaa to authenticate a user.
  • During the installation of adobe in Win 7 products I get this error: "certificate authentication failed.

    Windows 7 Edition using Home Premium.  Had Adobe Reader and Flash work and then had problems to update.  Uninstalled all Adobe products and now cannot re - install.  I get the error "certificate authentication failed.  Other proposed help sites enter gpedit.msc but it is not installed on my machine (not available with Win 7 Home Premium, I understand, $220 upgrade to Ultimate... :-(

    Hello

    Step 1: Run the fixit to solve the problems of the uninstalling and reinstalling:

    Solve problems with programs that cannot be installed or uninstalled

    http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/Program_Install_and_Uninstall

    Step 2: I suggest to try a clean boot and install.

    How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

    Note: After installing windows update, follow step 7 in the link provided to return the computer to a Normal startup mode

    To further support contact Adobe support to improve assistance to this topic:

    http://forums.Adobe.com/community/webplayers/flash_player

    http://www.Adobe.com/support/Flash/

    The video problems with Internet Explorer

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2532294

    It will be useful.

  • Unable to connect to the VMware Research Service - the SSL certificate verification failed

    Hello world

    to implement the new vCSA 5.1 but I get an error when you try to connect via browser Web Client.

    "Impossible to connect to the VMware Research Service . https://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:7444/lookupservice/sdk - The SSL certificate check failed. »

    I've found this KB

    http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/search.do?cmd=displayKC & docType = kc & externalId = 2033338 & sliceId = 1 & docTypeID = DT_KB_1_1 & dialogID = 423540040 & StateID = 1% 200% 20423538503

    The manual/work around seems to be a lot of work for me and perhaps this will cause other problems in the service due to problems of certification :/

    I also think that this cannot be the solution for a whole new vCSAppliance...-_-

    I am also able to go to https://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9443 / admin-app

    is it correct for the device?

    You need to regenerate the certificate for Server Appliance after change of IP/hostname.

    Visit this link: http://www.virtual-blog.com/2012/09/failed-to-connect-to-vmware-lookup-service/

    Also, the admin/management interface is https://: 5480

    Lack of credentials [root/vmware]

    HTH

  • Certificate autoenrollment fails after the update of the model

    Asked me to extend the period of validity on the certificates that we issue to users to authenticate on our wireless LAN. Group Policy allows us to cause users to automatically enroll for a certificate by using a version 3 template (our issuing CA is Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition). Users were able to automatically enroll for certificates with no problems.

    To increase the duration of validity, I modified the model certificate as a business administrator (I also increased the renewal period), then forced all certificate holders to re-register, which changed the model on the CA to 101,0 version (previously it was 100.2).

    None of my users seem to be reenrolled for the updated certificate. The search Event Viewer on my PC, I see four 'CertificateServicesClient-CertEnroll' information events (event ID 65, 64 & 66) suggesting that I connect successfully to the issuing certification authority, followed by a source "CertificateServicesClient CertEnroll" error (event ID 13) and error (ID of the event 6) source "CertificateServicesClient-autoenrollment" (details below). This sequence is generated whenever the autoenrollment is triggered.

    Can anyone suggest what could be the problem here? Thank you very much, Damion.

    Log name: Application
    Source: Microsoft-Windows-CertificateServicesClient-CertEnroll
    Date: 18/07/2011 08:44:24
    Event ID: 13
    Task category: no
    Level: error
    Keywords: Classic
    User: domain\user
    Computer: COMPUTER.exe.nhs.uk
    Description:
    Registration certificate for user domain\username could not enroll a certificate WirelessUser with the ISSUINGCA.domain\Issuing CA 19934 request for domain ID (the request template version is newer than the version of the model of support. 0 x 80094807 (-2146875385)).

    Log name: Application
    Source: Microsoft-Windows-CertificateServicesClient-registration auto
    Date: 18/07/2011 08:44:25
    Event ID: 6
    Task category: no
    Level: error
    Keywords: Classic
    User: n/a
    Computer: COMPUTER.exe.nhs.uk
    Description:
    Automatic registration of certificate for domain\user failed (0 x 80094807) the request template version is newer version of model taken in charge.

    This problem has been resolved by a restart of the server.

  • WIFI (MEP) Certificate Import failed

    Hello, I am trying to connect to the Wifi University Network (in Europe is "eduroam") and when I select Import the pem certificate file I get an error message stating that the import has failed and that is probably due to a damaged certificate file.
    This may not be the case because I'm using the same file in my laptop and used to use it in one android phone when I had a.

    Any suggestion is welcome!
    Thank you, Jose.

    Hi arsat

    You are referring to a Firefox for Android or Windows right questions? No Firefox for correct iOS?

    However, we need more troubleshooting information to help you. Please tell us which device (laptop, iPhone, Android phone, Tablet, etc.), what version of the operating system, what exactly were you doing, what happened and what you expected!

    See you soon!

    ... Roland

  • Trying to install Flash Player. Get the message: "internal error, Abort: certificate authentication failed, please reinstall to fix the problem. How do I thia?

    All the details in the title

    This solved it for me:
    1. click on start... Run
    2. type in the text box: "gpedit.msc" and press enter
    3. open in the left panel:
    Configuration of the user... Windows settings... Maintenance of Internet Explorer... Security
    4. click on "Authenticode Settings" in the right panel
    5 uncheck "Enable trusted publisher lockdown" and click OK

    It should work now...

  • Status 'Fail' Windows Windows Live Essentials 2011 (KB2434419)

    Achieved the status of "Failed" when, after update to Windows Windows Live Essentials 2011 (KB2434419).  Computer operations disrupted during the download that caused the failure.  How re-launch the update to get a State of success in my history of update?

    You can install/upgrade to Windows Live Essentials 2011 manually via http://explore.live.com/windows-live-essentials

    Harold Horne / TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2011. The information has been provided * being * with no guarantee or warranty.

  • S.M.A.R.T Status: failed

    Recently, I went to system information and disk utility and saw that my SMART State is a failure.

    I did some research to find out that it's something that I need to fix immediately by:

    1 save

    2. replace the hard drive

    Before I do, but I have a few questions:

    1 since I have a hard drive, it would be although I replace with a SSD? Because I've heard it has overall better performance.

    2. I know that sounds stupid, but is necessary backup?

    3. I don't know since when my State SMART said it was a failure, but what happens if I don't replace in time?

    4. should I take it to an Apple store and let them do for me? It would take more load than the replacement by myself?

    5. because my battery has also said 'Battery of Service', is it a good time for me to replace the battery as well?

    Thank you!

    xeronox23 wrote:

    1 since I have a hard drive, it would be although I replace with a SSD? Because I've heard it has overall better performance.

    If the price isn't too much for the bank account, certainly.  They are about 3 x the cost of an equivalent HARD disk.

    2. I know that sounds stupid, but is necessary backup?

    Always!

    3. I don't know since when my State SMART said it was a failure, but what happens if I don't replace in time?

    Smart function is not reliable at 100%, but at the very least, back up your data if you hold on to it.  Replace it, better safe than sorry.

    4. should I take it to an Apple store and let them do for me? It would take more load than the replacement by myself?

    It is easy to replace a HARD drive and a lot less expensive than having Apple do.

    5. because my battery has also said 'Battery of Service', is it a good time for me to replace the battery as well?

    Yes.

    Ciao.

  • Automatic update for Windows Mail Junk E-mail Filter for x 64 systems [November 2011] (KB905866) Installation status: failed.

    My Windows is set for automatic updates, I am running Vista SP2.
    Update for Windows Mail Junk e-mail filter for x 64 systems [November 2011] (KB905866) didn't load a number of times.
    He gave details of the error: Code 800736 B 3.
    Downloaded and run MicrosoftFixit, it is said that it is fixed.
    I went into Windows Update and tried downloading it twice, but it does not always load.
    It does not appear to slow the computer down while it tries to download.

    Hi Alex-862,

    1. you have made no changes to the computer before the broadcast took place?
    2 are you able to install all other updates?
    3. do you have the 64-Bit Windows Vista installed on the computer?

    Method 1
    I would say allows you to clean start, then download and install the update from the Download Center.

    How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135
    Note:
    follow step 7 of section of boot KB929135 to the computer in normal mode.

    Update for Windows Mail Junk e-mail filter for x 64 systems [November 2011] (KB905866)
    http://www.Microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?ID=20999

    Method 2
    Try the steps from the following link:

    Description of the preparation tool system update for Windows Vista for Windows Server 2008, for Windows 7 and for Windows Server 2008 R2
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/947821

  • CA server?

    Hello

    I do this server but below error is get.

    % Error in receiving the certificate of the CA: status = FAIL, length cert = 0

    I check: URL of the CA server, ACLTCP 80 open between ASA, RSA key and check trustpoint, ping is ok.

    Please help with this problem...

    Hello

    Check your date and time on the ASA and the CA server. Make sure they are synchronized. If they are not, there may be problems with obtaining the certificate of the certification authority.

    Also, configure you a challenge password when configuring the CEP on your CA?

    The command "debug crypto ca transactions" on the SAA can also help you to see where is the problem.

    Federico.

  • UCS Manager and using Microsoft Certificate Authority

    Everyone crossed by the configuration process UCS Manager with a certificate issued by a Microsoft certification authority?  If yes I would appreciate some help.  I was able to create a request and have generated the certificate successfully, but I see no way to be able to get back the request and the certificate chain in the UCS Manager.

    First you must create a trust (on the Admin-> Key Management tab). In the new trust point, paste public cert in your root certification authority base64 format. If you have a subordinate certification authority that brings then add cert that CA too. If you have a whole tree of certification authorities, then you should create a point of trust with any of the string of the issueing CA to the root. Paste a cert after the other, in order, the string, all in the same point of trust. If they are not in the right order, or if you are missing the root, then the TP does not accept the cert.

    Once you have a trust, you can accept the certificate that you generated. In the Keyring, you used to generate the request, select the new Point of confidence and paste the new certificate in Base64 format into the field of the certificate.

    Once this is done, you can go to the Directorate of Communication-> the Communication Services and for HTTPS, select the new key ring. It might not take effect immediately, but after a few minutes your web site UCSM should begin to answer with the new certificate.

    I hope this helps.

    Note: There is a bug in UCS currently send number CSCth62582. If your fabric interconnects fail, the SSL certificate will return to the default self-signed cert. You must go back in Communication services and set it to default, save it, and then assign the new ring of keys.

  • Failed Anyconnect corresponding certificate does not deny the user

    Hello

    I'm trying to implement matcing certificate when you use Anyconnect.

    I want ASA to check the issuer CN to a value.

    I have it configured, and it works.

    But when the corresponding defective certificate, the user still have access. It connects to the GRP_policy 'GroupPolicy_solbakken-any-test', but it should have failed.

    The log looks like this

    09:28:04 | 716001 | Group user IP <62.148.39.161>WebVPN session began.
    09:28:04 | 734001 | DAP: User Øystein solbakken, 62.148.39.161, connection AnyConnect Addr: following DAP records were selected for this connection: DfltAccessPolicy
    09:28:04 | 716038 | Group user IP <62.148.39.161>authentication: success, Session type: WebVPN.
    09:28:04 | 717037 | Research Group of the tunnel using certificate cards failed for the peer certificate: serial number: 2266234 A 000000000035, the name of the object: cn = Øystein solbakken, or = Brukere, OU = LUND, dc = dc = local, lund, issuer_name: cn=lund-S-TRD-AD-01-CA,dc=lund,dc=local.
    09:28:04 | 113009 | AAA recovered in group policy by default (GroupPolicy_solbakken-any-test) for user = Øystein solbakken
    09:28:04 | 717037 | Research Group of the tunnel using certificate cards failed for the peer certificate: serial number: 2266234 A 000000000035, the name of the object: cn = Øystein solbakken, or = Brukere, OU = LUND, dc = dc = local, lund, issuer_name: cn=lund-S-TRD-AD-01-CA,dc=lund,dc=local.
    09:28:04 | 717037 | Research Group of the tunnel using certificate cards failed for the peer certificate: serial number: 2266234 A 000000000035, the name of the object: cn = Øystein solbakken, or = Brukere, OU = LUND, dc = dc = local, lund, issuer_name: cn=lund-S-TRD-AD-01-CA,dc=lund,dc=local.
    09:28:04 | 725002 | 62.148.39.161 | 65223 | Complete appliance SSL negotiation with customer Internet:62.148.39.161/65223
    09:28:04 | 717028 | The certificate chain has been validated successfully with the warning, revocation status has not been verified.
    09:28:04 | 717022 | Certificate has been validated successfully. Serial number: 2266234A 000000000035, the name of the object: cn = Øystein solbakken, or = Brukere, OU = LUND, dc = lund, dc = local.
    09:28:04 | 302014 | 62.148.39.161 | 6875. 89.248.2.6 | 443. Connection TCP disassembly 2213 for Internet:62.148.39.161/6875 to identity:89.248.2.6/443 duration 0: 00:00 4448 TCP Reset bytes - I
    09:28:04 | 725001 | 62.148.39.161 | 65223 | Count of negotiating SSL client Internet:62.148.39.161/65223 TLSv1 session.
    09:28:04 | 725007 | 62.148.39.161 | 6875. SSL session with client Internet:62.148.39.161/6875 is complete.
    09:28:04 | 302013 | 62.148.39.161 | 65223 | 89.248.2.6 | 443. Built of TCP incoming connections 2214 for Internet:62.148.39.161/65223 (62.148.39.161/65223) at identity:89.248.2.6/443 (89.248.2.6/443)
    09:28:04 | 725002 | 62.148.39.161 | 6875. Complete appliance SSL negotiation with customer Internet:62.148.39.161/6875

    Can someone help me with this? I only want users successfully matching certificate to connect, all others should be rejected.

    Concerning

    Øystein

    Hi Øystein

    You can by mapping all users to a group that does not have a connection, for example:

    internal DenyAccess group strategy

    Group Policy attributes DenyAccess

    VPN - concurrent connections 0

    tunnel-group NoAccess type remote access

    tunnel-group NoAccess General attributes

    Group Policy - by default-DenyAccess

    crypto ca certificate map mymap 65535
    subject-name ne ""

    webvpn
    certificate-group-map mymap 65535 NoAccess

    hth
    Herbert

  • "Failed authentication of certificates." eror install Flash, how to unblock the Publisher

    My system is Dell Inspiron 1564 Intel Dual Core Processor, latest Win7 updates, IEv9.x try to install Adobe Flash Player v 11.2.202.228 and the editor is blocked, "Certificate authentication failed."  Where did I don't allow the continuation of this?

    TIA, CU L8R,
    NTxLS

    This editor has been blocked to run the software on your machine. How do I unlock my machine
    http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/vistaprograms/thread/6ac7c653-eb99-441A-B55A-ac021e121248

    In addition to the other comments, try the following:

    To unlock a software publisher:
    1. in Internet Explorer, click Tools and then click Internet Options.
    2. go in the content tab, look under the certificates section.
    3. click the publishers button.
    4. Select the untrusted publishers tab.
    5 Select the Publisher you want to unblock, and then click Remove.

Maybe you are looking for

  • New ENVY 17-j092nr very strange sound/no sound

    Hello I just bought a HP ENVY 17-j092nr 17.3 "laptop with Windows 8, and out of the box, there is a major issue of his. It's hard to explain, so I'll try my best. It is a certain type of sound from speakers but it's extremely studdered and virtually

  • Cleaning of 113GB library with many duplicates in the photo stream

    My Aperture library is 113 GB with many duplicates of Photostream, much of similar shots that I'd deleted years ago. A sea of thousands of duplicate and similar pictures. It's too hard to try to clean up now. After cleaning the individual (one per da

  • An illegal copy of Windows XP can be upgraded to Windows 7?

    First of all, some context to information. About six months ago, I bought a Samsung netbook for the brother of my friend who lives in Thailand. The machine came with a genuine copy of Windows 7 Home Premium. In fact, I paid extra for having him on le

  • Simple question on the option "send to" right click mouse

    A menu appears when you right-click on a file. One option is "send to" in the XP operating system there is a directory that contains links to these possible programs which were the targets of the option "send to." In Windows 7, I don't know the direc

  • My compaq hp sr5505f wit win vista family premium crashed

    My compaq hp sr5505f wit win vista family premium crashes a moment it start windows I get a blue screen saying Startup Repair cannot find or solve the problem, what can I do to get windows to start. It does not recognize my backups and vista came pre