Cisco 3.0 Premium certificates

Similar Questions

• Clients vpn AnyConnect and cisco using the same certificate

  Can use the same certificate on the ASA client Anyconnect and cisco vpn ikev1-2?

  John.

  The certificate is to identify a user/machine rather than the Protocol, then Yes, generally 'yes' you can use the same certificate for SSL/IKEv1/IKEv2 connections.

  What you need to take care of, it's that said certificate is fulliling Elements of the Protocol, for example implmentations IKEv2 is 'necessary' particular KU are defined and client-server-auth/auth EKU are defined on the certificates.

  M.

• Register with different versions of the CSA to Cisco ACS primary

  Hello, I updated a backup unit of two ACS to the 5.4.0.46.0a version first I changed it to standalone, and now I'm trying to save for the main CSA that is running the 5.1.0.44.2 version

  And I get this error

  This failure has occurred: com.cisco.nm.acs.im.certificate.Certificate; incompatible local class: stream classdesc serialVersionUID = 8507982043664257993, local class serialVersionUID = 1927357986028617243. Your changes have not been saved. Click OK to return to the list page.

  What can I do to solve it?

  Kind regards

  The primary and the secondary must be run on the same code.

  Jatin kone
  -Does the rate of useful messages-

• Revoked certificate of UCS Express E140D MMIC KVM

  So I have a bunch of 2951 s with E140D blades in them. I need to install ESXi on them but the stinking KVM (accessed via the MMIC) for each of them comes with a revoked certificate error.

  I just did this for a bunch of M3s C240 with no problems.

  CIMC firmware version is:

  2.1 (1.20130726203500)

  This appears to be later - I just downloaded the latest version and the number corresponds to the existing version.

  I did not open a TAC case again; I have problems with phone and my serial number don't like the online form. However, I'm going to miss a deadline for this reason.

  Here's the traceback of java:

  java.security.cert.CertificateRevokedException: certificate has been revoked, reason: AFFILIATION_CHANGED, date of revocation: Thu May 05 14:15:10 EDT 2011, authority: CN = VeriSign Class 3 Code signing 2010 CA, OU = terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c) 10, OR = VeriSign Trust Network, O = "VeriSign, Inc.", C = US, extensions: {}

  at com.sun.deploy.security.RevocationChecker.checkOCSP (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.deploy.security.RevocationChecker.check (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.deploy.security.TrustDecider.checkRevocationStatus (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.deploy.security.TrustDecider.getValidationState (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.deploy.security.TrustDecider.validateChain (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.deploy.security.TrustDecider.isAllPermissionGranted (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.security.AppPolicy.grantUnrestrictedAccess (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.security.JNLPSignedResourcesHelper.checkSignedResourcesHelper (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.security.JNLPSignedResourcesHelper.checkSignedResources (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.prepareResources (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.prepareAllResources (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.prepareToLaunch (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.prepareToLaunch (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.launch (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.Main.launchApp (unknown Source)

  at com.sun.javaws.Main.continueInSecureThread (unknown Source)

  to com.sun.javaws.Main.access$ 000 (unknown Source)

  to com.sun.javaws.Main$ 1.run (unknown Source)

  at java.lang.Thread.run (unknown Source)

  I don't see anything that looked relevant in newspapers.

  Hi Michael,

  It seems that you hit a bug for the E series: CSCtx85249.

  You will follow it please workaround for

  CSCtx85249    Could not launch KVM Java exception that certification was

  revoked

  Console KVM symptom does not start and displays the following Java

  exception error:

  Certificate has been revoked

  sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path validation failed:

  java.security.cert.CertPathValidatorException: certificate has been revoked

  Solution to workaround on the client system, disable the configuration of Java

  the Java Control Panel settings follow these steps:

  Step 1 go to advanced > Security > General

  Step 2 using CRL revocation checking certificates

  Enable line stage 3 validation of certificate

  If you use Mac, in addition to modifying the Java preferences, you must

  to change the CRL and OCSP checking off

  underKeychain > preferences > certificates under OSX.

  In some scenarios, you must do the following if you are a Mac user:

  Step 1 go to keychain > certificates. Double-click on the cisco.com partner

  certificate.

  Step 2: click the right arrow for Trust and select always trust in the when

  using this certificate dialog box.

  Step 3 restart the browser and connect to the MMIC web

  interface.

  Please, let me know if that solves the problem.

  Thank you

  -Bruce

• Cisco Cert Anyconnect VPN

  All the

  What is the advantage of purchasing a Cert compared to create our own?

  What is the process for buying a Cisco Cert for court Anyconnect VPN?

  A certificate issued by a well-known root certification authority will be automatically approved by most of the clients, which means they can't click past warnings / download your local certificate manually during the connection. Cisco does not sell certificates that they do not work a certification authority root in public. Any number of providers offer this service well (Entrust, GoDaddy, Verisign, Thawte etc.).

  Create your own requires a bit more expertise configuration and involves usually have your customers that is always click past warnings or manually install your local signed certificate in their trusted certificate store - generally regarded as binding by most end-users and inspiring potentially much more than calls from your home office or help of TI.

• Authenticate or import the certificate to another vendoor

  Hello

  I have to configure the security scenario after:

  On CISCO:

  -Add server (CA1) of CA certificate which host peer certificates

  -Add the CISCO recovered Certificate Server CA (A2)

  So I used according to:

  Crypto pki trustpoint CA_ROOT

  Terminal registration

  use of ssl-server

  revocation checking no

  and done manually authentication of the certificate of the CA server (A1).

  This is what it looks like:

  AS67129 (config) #crypto pki authenticate CA_ROOT

  Enter the base-64 encoded certificate authority.

  Ends with a blank line or the word "quit" on a line by itself

  -BEGIN CERTIFICATE-

  MIIB5zCCAZGgAwIBAgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBKMREwDwYDVQQKEwhFcmlj

  c3NvbjEPMA0GA1UECxMGQUwvRVRFMSQwIgYDVQQDExtURVNUIENBIGZvciBDUFAg

  U0NFUCBzZXJ2ZXIwHhcNMDkxMDIyMDgzNzQxWhcNMTkxMDIwMDgzNzQxWjBYMQsw

  CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLRXJpY3Nzb24gQUIxDzANBgNVBAsTBkFML0VU

  RTEiMCAGA1UEAxMZU3ViQ0EgZm9yIENQUCBTQ0VQIFNlcnZlcjCBnzANBgkqhkiG

  9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA3bR1yEyvrYDafqGSxZTUNcHW8OozdNO4ZKoMFZww

  4twVoC3mBvQxOYvEcC8YFgtxZVVynLzL1j/rEVyCIuGaTj5X7fNc9N7qDZMq1XQ /.

  HY8t + aBesvwrzjPKjt7rQ2P90B4w4uEjImGTyhmlGRlFx6XKz1ISMvGK + GLDtFlU

  XqMCAwEAAaMQMA4wDAYDVR0TBAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAANBAJxunpng

  k6diona1Bn65ToH5nu67D4N/PlABuFy86PhN9UyY + bHockyspoGDmgHle1zX1b2i

  nSGRkopq2MDqM3s =

  -CERTIFICATE OF END-

  quit smoking

  Trustpoint "CA_ROOT" is a subordinate certification authority and holds a nonfree signed cert

  Certificate has the following attributes:

  Fingerprint MD5: CF5E3F6A 6BD0F348 3612B 785 1259241C

  Fingerprint SHA1: 389FE1A7 CF3DD551 3C484EF1 BAC5DD28 1525F43A

  % Do you accept this certificate? [Yes/No]: Yes

  Certificate of the CA Trustpoint accepted.

  % Certificate imported successfully

  There are now executing command:

  Crypto PKI import CA_ROOT

  What is the difference between authentication and import?

  Result of this import command is that the certificate is not signed by the private key of CISCO.

  Currently there is no private key to CISCO.

  Any certificate is generated by the Protocol Server CEP, which will provide the certificate to the peer in host

  Configuration of the IpSec tunnel.

  Thank you

  Renato

  Hi Renato.

  The command crypto pki authenticate CA_ROOT is to authenticate the certificate authority (CA) (by obtaining the certificate of the certification authority)

  This command is required when initially configuring CA support to your router.

  This command authenticates the CA of your router with the CA certificate that contains the public key of the CA. Because CA signs its own certificate, you must manually authenticate the public key of the CA by contacting the CA administrator, when you enter this command.

  In the following example, the router asking for the certificate of the CA.  The CA sends its certificate and the router asks the administrator to check the certificate of authority of fingerprint verification of CA. The CA administrator can also view of the certificate of the CA, so you should compare what the CA administrator ensures that the router displays on the screen. If the fingerprint on the screen of the router matches the fingerprint, read by the CA administrator, you must accept the certificate as being valid.

  Router(config)# crypto pki authenticate myca 

  Certificate has the following attributes: 

  Fingerprint: 0123 4567 89AB CDEF 0123 

  Do you accept this certificate? [yes/no] y# 

  import of crypto pki certificate of name is to import the certificate of identity on the router.

  Here is the link you can follow

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/Security/command/reference/sec_c5.html#wp1044348

  HTH

  Concerning

  Regnier

  Please note all useful posts

• Cisco Expressway-C

  Hi all

  Can someone help me understand the below.

  1. What is the purpose of having Cisco Expressway-C?

  2. If I am Mobile deployment and remote access for jabber VPN less access from the outside then, why do I have Cisco Expressway-C?

  3. can I record video part 3 endpoint Cisco expressway-C?

  4. How can I register server Cisco Expressway-E with the 3rd party CA certificate?

  Thank you

  Tamim

   1.What is the purpose of having Cisco Expressway-C?

  Initially it was equivalent to CUCM Tandberg video, but it can do more (for example Firewall Traversal)

   2.If i am deploying Mobile and remote access for jabber VPN less access from outside then,why do i need Cisco Expressway-C?.

  Because for this you need a highway-E and an Expressway-E needs a highway-c to work with.

   3.Can i register 3rd party video endpoint to Cisco expressway-C?

  I don't think that you can when the highway is set for crossing of the UC. (But I'm not 100% certain on this point.)

   4.How can i sign Cisco Expressway-E server certificate with 3rd part CA?

  Connect to the web interface on Highway. Go interview->-> server certificate, security certificate. You can install your CA in Maintenance Certificates->-> trusted CA certificate, security certificate

  GTG

• Since Firefox 36.0 shows grey exclamation on https connection

  Hello

  before FF 36.0 everything worked well. Since FF 36.0 Firefox shows my connection with a grey exclamation point. IE, Chrome 40.0.2214.115 11 m also show good SSL/TLS connection. There are no images or anything else without charge https. It is a GeoTrust QuickSSL Premium certificate.

  Hello

  If I remove the seal of smarticon site all right. H99350 of GeoTrust of smarticon site seal uses RC4. They are now on it to fix it. I hope they get it soon.

• ASA-SSM-20 error: update automatic exception: failed connect HTTP

  Automatic update has worked for years, but it's not.

  I checked the sensor establishes a connection with the peer to https://72.163.4.161//cgi-bin/front.x/ida/locator/locator.pl

  ORC creds have not changed.

  What is happening here?  I have two sensors behave this way, btw.

  Thank you.

  John

  I had this at one of my clients. I dug into it and discovered the following:

  Cisco updated their SSL certificates certificates signed earlier this year to use SHA2. They are signed by a different root certification authority (Verizon if I remember correctly) and the IPS system image must be updated to the latest version (7.3 (5)) to approve of this CA root certificates.

  This is mentioned in the IPS 7.3 release notes (5):

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/IPS/7-3/release/notes/rele...

  • You need IPS 7.3 (5) to use the automatic update, global correlation and the participation of the network after the migration of the Certificate SHA-2 on Cisco websites.

• Trustpoint question

  Hello

  I tried to register my ASA with the CA PKI.

  I was wondering if someone can clarify what is the purpose of a trustpoint.

  I searched and according to this article, he says that it is a container where certificates are stored and says a trustpoint can store 2 patents, including the certification authority and a certificate of identity of the SAA.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/52076/certificate-backup-and-in...

  I went to Configuration > Device Management > Certificate Management > CA certificates and received the certification authority. my understanding is that this step allows the ASA trust the certificate signed by this CA. for the name of trustpoint, I used my CA

  I then went to Configuration > Device Management > Certificate Management > identity certificates and tried to apply for a certificate of identity. for the name of trustpoint, I used the same name (my-CA). looking at the error message I got, looks like me using the same name of trustpoint to the certification authority and certificate of identity is the origin of the problem.

  [OK] crypto ca trustpoint ma-CA
  Crypto ca My CA trustpoint
  [OK] - revocation checking no
  [OK] keypairs Cert-identity-key pair
  [OK] password xxxx
  [OK] id-use ssl secured by ipsec
  [Does OK] no name FQDN
  [OK] name of the object CN = asa 5505, O = home, C = US, St = OH
  [ERROR] registration url http://NDES/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
  Registration of Trustpoint configuration cannot be changed for an authenticated trustpoint.

  [ERROR] crypto ca authenticate my-CA nointeractive
  You may use 'no crypto trustpoint < name-trustpoint > ca' to remove the previous CA certificate.

  [OK] crypto ca enroll my-CA tmpfs

  so my question is, what name to use for trustpoint? and do we need a new trustpoint to each identity and the certificate of the CA that we install in the asa?

  Thank you

  you need to generate a CSR and send it to HQ; provide it it the ID-cert and cert of the CA root; install cert ID first, then the CA cert root

• ASA and SSL compatibility

  Hello

  We want to buy a SSL certificate to change the real certificate in ASA. Is there a requirement or a specific type of certicate compatible with ASA?

  Thank you

  See this document

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808a61cd.shtml

  Support for 3rd-party CA vendors are Baltimore, Cisco, Entrust, iPlanet/Netscape, Microsoft, RSA and VeriSign. So if you want Cisco support, need a certificate from these suppliers but we also used successfully certificate from other suppliers... Generally, it should be an X.509 certificate

  M.

  hope that helps rate if it is

• IPS Signature update occurs, IPS Vesion: 7.0000 E4

  Hi team,

  Recently we started to notice that the automatic update IPS signature is not the case, then we download the signature and update manually, even

  Current version of IPS: 7.1 (7) E4

  Last Signature, we tried: 922.0,.

  We are able to ping the IP Address of the Cisco server: 72.163.4.161, in the accompaniment of the last Signature of 7.0000 E4 version note is not included, we face the problem because of this?

  Please ask your expert advice on this subject,

  Thank you

  Vishnu

  You must have IPS 7.1 (11) E4 or E4 5,0000 or later in order to update since the beginning of this year when Cisco spent the SHA2 certificates.

  Reference: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/640/fn64080.html

  If you use an old IPS Manager Express (IME), you will also need to upgrade for full management.

• ISE Voip phones: authentication failed against AD

  the message is

  2064 authentication method is not supported by any point of sale there is identity: authentication failed

  the user is present on the AD and test user to ise is ok

  the rule for check in AD authentication is created

  servers of strategy are fulfilled and in green

  If I create an internal user (just to test) authentication is ok

  my sequence of authentication is:

  MAB

  mab_ad

  dot1x

  dot1x_ad

  These phones use eap - md5

  I guess there is something to check in AD, can someone help me solve this problem?

  I don't think that Active directory supports EAP - Md5.

  I will recommend rather to use EAP - TLS. Most of the Cisco IP phones have certificates built-in MIC, which really helps to deploy EAP - TLS

• Cannot install PEM/pkcs12 created by gnutls ASA

  I was pulling a few hair trying to figure why the cisco devices like my certificates. My primary need is to get a trustpoint put in place with CA, cert, key on the SAA for VPN systems, but I'm having the same issues on my IOS devices. I created a pkcs12 with openssl a few months ago who imported without any problems, but now that I'm about to move this laboratory to the production I use gnutls certtool I found it adds alt_dns and IPAddress fields correctly the certificate (which cost me a few hairs more trying to get to work with openssl ca tool)

  I'm including the current test certificates below, don't worry, I don't use these in production

  The maddening thing is that after I thought gnutls incorrectly generated the certs, I tried to do a pkcs12 for a printserver and it imported without any problems.

  Here's my stream in order for the creation of these certificates:

  certtool--Generer-privkey--disable-Rapide-random--outfile nn - ca.key

  certtool--Generer-SOI-Signe--charge-privkey nn - ca.key - outfile nn - ca.crt

  certtool--Generer-privkey--disable-Rapide-random--outfile nn - g0.key

  certtool - generate-certificate-load-privkey nn - g0.key - outfile nn - g0.crt - load-ca-privkey nn - ca.key - load-ca-certificate nn - ca.crt

  OpenSSL pkcs12-export - certfile nn - ca.crt - nn - g0.crt - nn - inkey-out g0.key nn - g0.p12

  OpenSSL enc-base64-in nn - g0.p12 - out nn - g0.base64.p12

  The password for the pkcs12 attatched is "ciscohelp" without the quotes. Thanks for any help

  IOS also gives a coding error when you import the PKCS #12 file:

  CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0 x 701 (E_BER_ENCODING: invalid format for the encoding of the input data): failure of a file imported PKCS12

  However the PKCS #12 file itself is fine; the problem is with certificates in it. You say trying to authenticate a trustpoint using file nn - ca.cert: IOS and ASA will refuse the certificate.

  After a further review of DER content in these two certificates, looks that public key encoding is wrong:

  $ openssl asn1parse - i-dump - in nn - g0.crt | grep - a 18 "rsaEncryption$".

  299:d = 4 hl = 2 l = 9 prim: OBJECT: rsaEncryption

  310:d = 3 hl = 4 l = 270 prim: STRING of BITS

  0000 - 00 30 82 01 09 02 82 01 - 00 B3 e1 1f 59 7 bis bd. 0... Yz.

  ...

  0100 - 86 7th c1 bb 62 18 40 02 03 01 00 01 f0 - 8f. ~... b.@.......

  The public key module and the Exhibitor are coded as a nested der offset 310 object:

  $ openssl asn1parse - i-dump - in nn - g0.crt - strparse 310

  0: d = 0 hl = 4 l = 265 cons: SEQUENCE

  4:d = 1 hl = 4 l = 256 prim: INTEGER:-214C1EE0A685422FC3F5... BF0F71

  264:d = 1 hl = 2 l = 3 prim: INTEGER: 010001

  You can see that the module shows up as a negative number. This is not expected; the first bit of the bit string is always supposed to be zero, not one. If the first bit in the module is one, the value must be preceded with a leader of 0 bytes. Looking at the encoding to compensate 310:

  00 = no fill

  30 82 01 09 = sequence of length 265

  02 82 01 00 = integer of length 256

  B3... = value module with first bit set to 1

  I produced another set of certificates using your CLI on my machine and got a correct result:

  $ openssl asn1parse - i-dump - in gtls/nn - ca.crt. grep - a 19 "rsaEncryption$".

  188:d = 4 hl = 2 l = 9 prim: OBJECT: rsaEncryption

  199:d = 4 hl = 2 l = 0 prim: NULL

  201:d = 3 hl = 4 l = 271 prim: STRING of BITS

  0000 - 00 30 82 01 0 a 02 82 01-01 00 d0 0c c4 46 07 2f. 0... / F.

  ...

  0100 - 64 60 1A ac b7 1f 53 ae-95 02 03 01 00 01 4 d of... S.. M.....

  As you can see, the encoded value is: 00 d0 0c c4... which includes a zero-byte prefix to take account of the fact that the module starts by D0. Nested decoding shows a positive number:

  $ openssl asn1parse - i-dump - in gtls/nn - ca.crt - strparse 201

  0: d = 0 hl = 4 l = 266 cons: SEQUENCE

  4:d = 1 hl = 4 l = 257 prim: INTEGER: D00CC42F46079BC7... 71F53AE954D

  265:d = 1 hl = 2 l = 3 prim: INTEGER: 010001

  and the certificate is imported correctly.

  I could not reproduce this problem encoding with GnuTLS 2.12.14 on Ubuntu latest version. What version do you use?

• integrated macOS Sierra Cisco IPsec VPN does not work anymore (impossible to validate the server certificate)

  Hello

  I just upgraded to macOS Sierra and built-in Cisco IPsec VPN no longer works. When you try to connect, I get a "cannot validate the certificate of the server. "Check your settings and try to reconnect" error message. I use Cisco ASA with self-signed certificates and everything worked fine with previous versions of OS X.

  Please help me, I need my VPN Thx a lot

  I am having the same problem with StrongSwan and help cert signed with the channel to complete certificates included in the pkcs12 file imported to the keychain. It was working properly in El Capitan, but now broken in the Sierra.