Cisco 6500 - WCCP - high CPU

I'm setting up a stand-alone WAE-7341 engine content ACNS used to webcaching only.

When I activate the redirect l2 and l2-back on the WAE I get high CPU on my Cisco 6504-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3 b-WS-F6K-PFC3B. The 6500 status of wccp as L2 for redirection and return and webcache work but this CPU spikes at 70%.

IOS code: s3223-adventerprisek9_wan - mz.122 - 33.SXH7.bin

MDF-6504 #show proc sort cpu | 0.00 EXC
CPU utilization for five seconds: 47/45%; 01:00 %; 05:00 %
Process PID Runtime (ms) Invoked uSecs 5 Sec 1 Min 5 Min TTY
152 9304 5144 1808 0.71% 0.22% 0.17% 1 SSH process
139 46322920 12113823 3823 0.47% 0.40% 0.44% 0 CDP Protocol

I don't see what process is the cause, but if I remove the WCCP in the interface, it drops to 1% so I know for a fact that WCCP is the cause.

If I remove the redirect l2 and l2-back on the WAE, WCCP on the registers of 6500 WILL redirect and return on the 6500 and CPU falls to 5%.

If I activate the option "wccp webcache accelerated" on the 6500, I can't WCCP upward with or without back l2 and l2-redirection on the WAE options, it displays:

001782: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: enter

001783: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: exit

001784: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:S00: Here_I_Am [hidden ip] package fwd w/bad method 00000001, offered 00000002

001785: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:S00: Here_I_Am package [hidden ip] with capabilites incompatible

Can anyone say about this issue, this 6500 is the ability to redirect/rewrite of material? My WAE is directly connected to the blade of 6500 WS - X 6548-GE-TX on the same vlan I have do a wccp redirect on.

g3/4 interface

WAE-7341 description

switchport access vlan 600

interface VLAN 600

property intellectual cache wccp web redirection in

Any method, ideally you do not place the WAE on the same VLAN entering as the users.

Tags: Cisco Network

Similar Questions

  • Cisco 4506 high CPU usage

    Hello

    Yesterday afternoon, one of our 4506 switch has climbed to 96% CPU usage. I did not the configuration changes. Here is the process with high CPU usage

    40 36630921841089949084 3360% 8.63% 10.56% 11,29% 0 Cat4k Mgmt HiPri

    41 30929587802851505705 1084 36,61 36,53% 36.18% 0 Cat4k Mgmt LoPri

    76 72485492 270422107 268 entry IP 7.91% 7.72% 7,68% 0

    113 35661224 40030007 890 21.91 28.13 29,84% 0 DHCPD receive

    After having HS health platform, what are those high:

    S2w-JobEventSchedule 10.00 7.54 10 8 100 500 9 9 7 36703:06

    Stub-JobEventSchedul 10.00 12.23 10 48 100 500 12 12 9 51004:51

    K2CpuMan review 30,00 29,44 30 99 100 500 33 32 25 37067:58

    K2AccelPacketMan: Tx 10.00 12,15 20 1 100 500 12 12 10 11871:22

    And finally sh platform cpu packet statistics gives me this

    Packets dropped in hardware by CPU Subport (txQueueNotAvail)

    UC Subport TxQueue 0 TxQueue 1 TxQueue 2 TxQueue 3

    ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------

    0 11045 14031 149981 188579662

    1               0               0               0         5919279

    2               0          115638               0               0

    RkiosSysPacketMan:

    Falures allowance package: 0

    Package (common software) buffer allocation falures: 0

    Package Buffer (software ESMP) allocation falures: 0

    Package Buffer (software EOBC) allocation falures: 0

    Falures IOS Packet Wrapper buffer allocation: 0

    Packets dropped in the overall treatment

    Total 5 s 1 min, 5 min 1 hour avg avg avg avg

    -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

    146521131 0 0 0 0

    Packets dropped in treatment by event CPU

    AVG s Total 5 1 min, 5 min avg avg avg 1 hour event

    ----------------- -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

    Input Acl 146002289 0 0 0 0

    SA Miss                             27         0         0         0          0

    Packets dropped in the treatment of priority

    AVG s Total 5 priority 1 min, 5 min avg avg avg 1 hour

    ----------------- -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

    Normal 46723179 0 0 0 0

    Medium 518884 0 0 0 0

    High 99797883 0 0 0 0

    Packets dropped in the treatment of the reason

    AVG s Total 5 reason 1 min, 5 min avg avg avg 1 hour

    ------------------ -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

    SrcAddrTableFilt 24 0 0 0 0

    L2DstDrop                             7         0         0         0          0

    L2DstDropInAcl 46 0 0 0 0

    NoDstPorts                           32         0         0         0          0

    NoFloodPorts 146521022 0 0 0 0

    The package 16 total queues

    Packets received from the packet queue

    Total 5 s 1 min, 5 min 1 hour avg avg avg avg queue

    ---------------------- --------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

    6279742115 238 247 203 193 ESMP

    L2/L3Control 1320811357 57 48 43 41

    Host of learning 24933459 1 0 0 0

    L3 Fwd Medium 5813 0 0 0 0

    L3 Fwd Low 72923122 0 0 0 0

    L2 Fwd high 11130 0 0 0 0

    L2 Fwd Medium 164016 0 0 0 0

    L2 Fwd 242645408 227 237 193 185 Low

    L3 Rx High                           9         0         0         0          0

    L3 Rx 89296999 439 461 378 364 Low

    Failure of the RPF 129420 0 0 0 0

    Packets dropped packet queue

    Total 5 s 1 min, 5 min 1 hour avg avg avg avg queue

    ---------------------- --------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

    L2/L3Control 18470371 0 0 0 0

    Host of learning 5825831 0 0 0 0

    L2 Fwd Low 405210 0 0 0 0

    L3 Rx Low                         9863         0         0         0          0

    I will be restarting the night switch to see if it helps.

    Thank you.

    Salman

    Hello Salman,

    If DHCP requests are taken over by clients, you will probably want to focus on the limiting of requests DHCP using DHCP snooping.

    ip dhcp snooping limit rate rate

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-4000-series-switches/65591-Cat4500-high-CPU.html#high_cpu

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst4500/12-2/25ew/configuration/guide/conf/DHCP.html#wp1073418

    -Ginette

  • High CPU consumption (always between 12 and 30%)

    I am running Firefox 9.0.1 for Mac. Until the upgrade to version 9.0.1 I had no use of high CPU problems... I've now must constantly between 12% and 30% of CPU and up to sometimes use much further than that, which really slows down my Mac to a point where I have to kill Firefox to use other applications.

    I have a new Mac mini with fast CPU and 8 GB of RAM.

    I tried to reinstall and also to disable the 4 Add-ons I have installed. After a new installation and all 4 disabled add-ons, I see exactly the same problem even with one tab open to google.com

    Any help from the community is very much appreciated.

    Thanks in advance...

    I've upgraded to Firefox 10 and this issue is now resolved.

  • High CPU after 10.11.3 at 10.11.4 upgrade

    Use El Capitan successfully for several months, 10.11.1 to 10.11.3 migration. However, the upgrade to 10.11.4 led to relatively stable high CPU.

    In particular, I see process launchd (about 75%), UserEventAgent (70%) and mds_stores (30%) CPU consumption at that rate there essentially all the time, the % overall slowed down when do nothig is about 45% - therefore on an end of 2014 retina iMac 27 inches with Fusion drive. Despite this, everything works still with reasonable performance, probably because there is still spare CPU capacity.

    Looking at the Console log, I see a lot of

    29/03/2016 18:17:01.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

    29/03/2016 18:18:02.001 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

    29/03/2016 18:19:03.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

    29/03/2016 18:20:04.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

    It's be connected at intervals of a minute or so, although I don't see any referenced messages.

    Removed some of the programs began and eliminated some of the agents launched (I think) and also re-installed from the recovery partition, but the problem is still there.

    Someone at - it watched questions along these lines?

    Would appreciate any suggestions.

    Try each of them in order. A test to see if the computer works properly:

    1. Reset the PRAM
    2. Reset the controller (SMC) system management
    3. Start the computer in Safe Mode, and then restart normally. It's slower than a standard home.
    4. Repair the disk by booting to the recovery HD immediately after the chime press keys control and R that the Utility Menu appears. Choose disk utility and click on the button continue. Select the withdrawal (usually Macintosh HD) volume entry of the list to one side.  Click first aid button in the toolbar. Hold the button brings up. Disk utility and return in the Utility Menu. Restart the computer from the Apple Menu.
    5. Reinstall OS X by booting from the Recovery HD using the command and R keys. When the Utility Menu appears, select reinstall OS X and then click continue.
    6. Download and install updated Combo OS X El Capitan 10.11.4.
  • Satellite P300-212 - system causes the periodic high CPU load

    Windows Vista Edition Home Premium (OEM) on the Toshiba Satellite P300-212

    Even on a system Windows freshly installed (from recovery DVDs), the system process (PID 4, NT Kernel & System) causes on a regular basis (every five minutes) a CPU load high for a few seconds, during which the system hangs, not even the mouse pointer can be moved.
    Sysinternals Process Explorer identifies the thread of high load as "ntkrnlpa.exe! ExfTryAcquirePushLockShared + 0 x 15 2 "with the thread ID 20 or 24.

    Does anyone have an explanation for this behavior or a solution to the problem?

    Hey,.

    If you have installed Windows recovery disk Toshiba but still high CPU usage? Hmm that's strange because this image is tested by Toshiba

    Have you installed or uninstalled any software or tools?
    I uninstall the current antivirus and disable some start up programs you n t need in msconfig. Usually, this should work.

  • Tecra M2 - stop hard on high CPU (turns off with no BSOD)

    Experienced stops consistent when the CPU is running at full during a little while.
    -J' mean 'stops' complete power cut with no blue screen of death where all is lost and the computer must be restarted manually.
    -by "high CPU", I mean when the processor locks to full use such that when you insert a column in a big Excel sheet with errors or if you want a large number of files and you open a video from the network or when you run a registry scan and antivirus analysis at the same time.

    The problem took place regularly for a few months and I can now make a case with greater predictability. Using the hardware monitor suite 'Everest', it seems that the problem occurs when the temperature of the CPU is located at 99 for more than a minute or more.

    This happens with some, but never when batteries run - then attempts to force the error, it will not be stopped if the power cable is released just before the drop point.

    In the cases of the problem, it seems to be a small error message appearing only a fraction of a second before the death of the computer.

    Each reference forum and help that I read would suggest the problem is related material and that the chip or the motherboard is overheating and need replacement. While the laptop is almost 18 months old, I bought a new ' everything except the screen and HDD "earlier this year, and was not prepared to accept the explanation without more tests.

    Kantonix Linux works very well and the CD starts seems to tax the processor as much as the same events that kill for me under XP.

    A few weeks back, I installed Windows XP on a second HARD drive in the Bay of hotswappable and noted the installation seems to work pretty hot computer and he died during the process. It has experienced no difficulties for while but, a few days after moving the HARD drive reinstalled in the primary position and after you have reinstalled a lot a lot of applications, the error started happening again.

    Last night I caught a few fractions of a second before the death, the pulling power and stop the process and allow me to see the error message (as mentioned above):

    -first message came from "TOSHIBA Power Saver" saying "a fatal error occurred at x 06" (not sure about the last bit) ".

    -second message was "THotkey.exe' saying 'could not load powrprof.dll.

    -monitoring of several hundred cases of the second message.

    Because of the error messages, I was not able to get a print screen.

    Solutions or even on ideas that would be very appreciated!

    Post edited by: DC-financial

    Hello

    According to your explanations and the information in your ad, I think that the problem is related to the software.
    You wrote something about energy saving. This Toshiba utility controls the speed of the CPU and the use of cooling modules.
    I think that this request could be responsible by the judgments. Try reinstalling this utility.
    In addition, check the configuration of the unique power plans. If you work only with battery energy saver using another mode of power supply as working on AC.
    I think you could check these consumption patterns and configure it.

    Verification of the cooling module is also not a bad idea. Maybe fans cannot work properly because of the dust and debris inside the books.
    I use the vacuum cleaner to clean the fans. CA? s an easy way to make it free of dust.
    But if you get it, you must be careful.

  • Qosmio F60 - alert constantly high CPU usage

    Hello

    About 12 months ago, I bought a Toshiba Qosmio F60 computer laptop 6 GB.

    When exploring using games, facebook etc, I am constantly alert of my Norton informing that there is high CPU usage.

    I have asked around locally and advised to delete Norton because this may be the problem. I'm not eager to do what my subscription is still valid.

    I also learned the other day that this is a common problem with laptops Toshiba using 'Explorer' and that I should use "Mozilla Firefox" instead which would correct the problem.

    I am trying to arrange this.

    Can you please indicate if it is a regular problem with Toshiba laptops and reviewing the options above to try to address this problem.

    It doesn't really seem to my computer, it goes more slowly and when in the Manager tasks, it is constantly fluctuating between 5 and 35%

    I look forward for your reply.

    Thank you

    Melissa

    Hello

    This isn't a problem laptop buddy
    Norton AntiVirus is a good antivirus program, but it uses a lot of resources and my experience locks the CPU.

    I removed this antivirus software and now I m using the avast and Avira Antivir free Antivirus software. Both are freeware software.

    But I still use Internet Explorer. Of course, I also installed the firefox and chrome. All these three browsers are great.

  • opendirectoryd process has high CPU

    The opendirectoryd process is very high CPU. I have tried the method that Apple Support Doc says. But this isn't the solution.

    I also try to close port 22. No effect.

    I don't know why this problem occurs. The only solution is to restart the computer.

    I use MacBook Pro early 2011, OS X 10.11.3

  • Satellite A 110 is suspended due to high CPU temperatures

    Hello

    My computer is hung up on me while running certain applications (such as Dreamweaver CS3) or other situations in which work the CPU at maximum performance. I suspect that the reason is high CPU temperatures and indeed download several CPU, monitor applications (like thermal analyst intel) my average CPU temperature is around 61 degrees (Celsius), and before the computer hangs (instantly - just completely stop lose power), it reaches very high and not necessairly after working for a long time.

    My questions:
    1. is this a known problem with this model?
    2. is there anything I can do to limit this problem and avoid data loss?

    Thanks in advance,

    URI

    I think you will need to contact the ASP in your country for assistance.
    In your case maybe the cooling module may not work correctly. Probably the thermal grease that is placed between the CPU and the cooling module must be renewed.

    All these things need to be clarified.
    So call it the ASP.

  • DAQmx read results 2 ms/s in high CPU usage

    I have an application that reads the 32 channels of 2 ms/s analog input signals, at the same time. The actual hardware will be: SMU-8135 Win7, chassis SMU-1071, 2 x SMU-6368 (16 channels). The SMU-two 6368 will provide 32 channels data acquisition.

    I don't have the material at the moment, but I've been estimate the processor on the alternative configurations needs, because I have concerns about the use of the CPU to data acquisition high speed. Two alternative configurations are:

    (1) SMU-8133 (quad core) WinXP, SMU-1062 q, PXI-6133.

    (2) PXI-8106 (dual-core) WinXP, PXI-6133, PXI-1042.

    Note: PXI-6133 supports high speed HAVE 2 ms/s, at the same time.

    I wrote a simple continuous data acquisition software to allow me to compare the CPU usage. The sample rate and the number of channels are configurable. What I found is:

    (1) at low sampling frequency, for example 100 kech. / s, the CPU usage is minimal on both configurations (bicoeur or image), regardless of the number of channels is 1 or 8. The reading of the CPU was about 1-4%

    (2) at high sampling frequency, for example 2 ms/s, what is the number of channels used, either 1 or 8, the CPU utilization was 50% for dual core and 25% for the quad core, IE. a full core has been fully utilized.

    (3) the passage of the low use of the processor (<5%) to="" high="" cpu="" usage="" (="">45%) increases when the sampling rate is rather steep and shows interesting channel-dependence (note the following has been achieved with a PXI-8106 controller, dual-core).

    • @1 channel, it happened between 950 to 970 k
    • @2 channels, it happened between 470 to 480 k
    • @4 channels, it happened between 230 to 240 k,.
    • @8 channels, it happened between 120 to 130 k.

    This model reminds me of buffer length related question but I double checked a sufficient length of the buffer was used. He suggested also, surprising a few traffic jams occurred when the amount of data increases up to certain level.

    My question is, is this a problem with this particular card (PXI-6133) or driver DAQmx (9.5.5f4). How the problem is when I'm doing an acquisition of 32 channels?

    For your information, I have attached the benchmarking software.

    Thank you!

    Donghui Yin

    I followed this example code (see link below) and used based on events DAQmx, now the excessive CPU utilization problem has been resolved. Playback from the CPU is now less than 10 percent, while it could be 50% (in the case of dual-core) or 25% (case of hearts) at the same sample rate and number of channels.

    http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/EPD/p/ID/5911

  • A process called "svctimesag.exe" consumes high CPU on the Production Server.

    OT: svctimesag.

    Hi team,

    In one of our Production Server is a process called "svctimesag.exe" using high CPU. This problem has been detected the day before.

    For immediate solution, we killed the process, but it did not help, then you need to restart our server.

    In the past 24 hours this process has shoot to the top of the CPU twice and you need to restart the server with force.

    Also searched the Internet but found no information. The location of the file on the server is C:\Program Files (x86)\Products\svctimesag\svctimesag.exe

    We organize engine on the server management application. We also opened the case with them to know the process.

    If any user face any problem with that part of process please your valuable troubleshooting strike.

    Thanks in advance.

    This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  • Norton is the internet Explorer display high cpu use

    Norton 360 is showing a high utilization of the processor with internet explore.  What does that mean?  How to fix (if necessary)?

    You must request the help of Norton Support.

    You could start here: http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-360/Constant-High-CPU-usage/td-p/473508

    If you are unhappy with your subscription or Norton 360 are subject to deadline you could follow the advice of Tommy Stanley and try another program BC

    http://www.AV-Comparatives.org/

    http://www.dslreports.com/Forum/r25776413-2011-anti-virus-poll

    Kind regards...

  • Is short boot fail reason (error 1000-0146) Office of glitter and high cpu?

    Dell inspiron 6000. Windows xp professional sp 3. Three weeks ago, my computer started loud beep on startup and sparkle of the desktop icons. The touchpad has stopped working for a while, but most of the time which is fixed. I installed malwarebytes' eliminating about four Trojan horses and tried to update all the drivers. I did a restore of the system about 3 times. When I ran a test drive, there was a failed test short boot 1000-0146 error. When my app icons start to Flash my cpu jumps to 100%. Pressing any key usually stopped for a bit. Is this a compatibility issue with my software or the failure of short boot is the cause. Help!

    Hi Nutmeg30,

    • Did you the latest changes on the computer?
    • You have security software installed on the computer?

    Learn more about the test of startup failures see link below on the Dell site and check if it helps.

    Pre Boot System Assessment (PSA) Diagnostics and Error Codes for Dell computers

    http://support.Dell.com/support/topics/global.aspx/support/KCS/document?docid=DSN_300428&isLegacy=true

    It is possible that some third-party programs installed on the computer is causing the flickering and high CPU utilization issue.

    I suggest that you configure the computer in a clean boot state and check if it helps.

    To help resolve the error and other messages, you can start Windows XP by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot". A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

    See section to learn more about how to clean boot.

    How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

    Reset the computer to start as usual

    When you are finished troubleshooting, follow these steps to reset the computer to start as usual:

    1. Click Start , and then click run.
    2. Type msconfig , and then click OK.
      The System Configuration utility dialog box appears.
    3. Click the general tab, click Normal Startup - load all device drivers and services , and then click OK.
    4. When you are prompted, click restart to restart the computer.
  • High CPU usage by "System outages" and missing keystrokes in IE on all new HP laptop 15-r085nd

    I recently bought a HP15-r085nd (Win 8.1 with Bing), and right out of the box, I encountered this problem:

    After the awakening of the mode (usually after the first time to wake from sleep mode, but always after the second time), the process "System outages" has high utilization of the processor, up to 45%. The laptop then responds very, very slow. In addition, in Internet Explorer (but only in Internet Explorer, it seems!) strikes are missing out.

    I tried the following:

    -Implementation of all the updates of Windows, all McAfee updates and all of the updates from HP Assistent. No results.

    -Reinstall all the drivers, no results. Windows system restore: no result. Factory reset the recovery partition: no result. Then implemented all the updates again: no result.

    -J' tried to use Microsoft Xperf to diagnose the problem: it seems wdf0100.sys to blame for the high CPU usage. (In other words, if I have interpreted the results in the right way).

    -J' then did some troubleshooting with Microsoft Support: they asked me to disable all startup items in the Task Manager and disable all non-Microsoft services in msconfig. The result was that the high CPU usage of "System interrupts" occurred less frequently after the first time out of the way 'sleep', but still she always had after the second time to wake off mode 'sleep'. Uninstallation of McAfee seems to have the same effect, by the way.

    -J' then did some troubleshooting with the store were I bought it. They used a pilot program to install newer versions of the drivers. Also, in vain.

    Then they gave me another laptop of the same model (r085nd). It had exactly the same problems. So I think that all laptops of this model have the same problem! Does anyone know of a similar case with a laptop similar?

    -J' then did some troubleshooting with HP support. We have updated the BIOS (F.24), without result. We have made a few updates to additional drivers on the HP site, no results. We wanted to update the graphic driver Intel HD (sp65598), but we couldn't install it, an error message saying: minimum system requirements were not satisfied.

    I hope that the HP support can arrive at a solution (they wanted to deepen this). If so, I'll promise to post it here, because it affects probably other r085nd HP as well.

    In the mean time, I'd appreciate any suggestions, because I'm totally confused now. Someone at - it ideas? I will answer all the answers!

    I was contacted by HP Support again. After a new series of updates which included some updates everything new on the site of HP is solved the problem with high CPU usage by "system outages"!

    We have done several updates, so I know not that exactly solved the problem, but it is those:

    -New firmware BIOS: version F.33 (my bet would be that is the one that solves the problem)

    -New Intel chipset driver: 1.20 (sp69575.exe)

    -New driver Intel HD Graphics: 1.20 (sp69589.exe): 10.18.10.3958 (this one tried earlier, without solving the problem)

    -New driver Realtek card reader: 1.20Ap3 (sp69610.exe)

    I hope this helps other people with the same problem.

    Thanks to the HP Support team for their help with this problem!

    Moreover, the problem of lack of strikes in Internet Explorer (more use of CPU (any reason), the sequences of keys more are not registered!) still exists! I work around this problem by using Google Chrome. Again, I hope that this issue might get resolved as well! I nevertheless marks it as "Resolved" as the main problem is resolved.

  • Windows Explorer high cpu use jn 9

    Computer freezes & I have to restart my computer

    Hello

    (1) do you have made no changes before this problem?
    (2) you receive an error message then the closure of the computer?
     
    Follow the steps from the links below and check if it helps.
     
    Method 1: You can check if the Windows Task Manager also shows high CPU usage. To do this, follow the steps mentioned in the link.
    See details about your computer's performance using Task Manager
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/see-details-about-your-computers-performance-using-Task-Manager
     
    Method 2: Follow the instructions in Internet Explorer 9 from the link below and check if it makes a difference.
    Use the software instead of rendering GPU rendering
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2398082
     
    Method 3: Run the FIXIT from the link below, and if that helps.
    Solve Internet Explorer add-on problems when IE hangs or freezes
     
    Hope this information helps.
     
     

Maybe you are looking for