Compare the instances of the entity

Similar Questions

• Need to sort the instances of an entity or assign a rank to each of them based on one of the attributes.

  I need to assign a rank to each instance of an entity called 'Campaign', based on one of the attributes of the entity of campaign called "recipes". So, essentially, that we need to check the current instance with all other insatnces of campaign, assign the relative to the current row.

  Emergency assistance would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  A common method is to create a relationship of self-esteem for the campaign.  Call it something like "lower income".

  Rule 1 creates relationships for campaigns that have a lower income:

  Campaign (target) is a member of the decline in revenues, if

  Revenue from target< compaign="">

  2 account rule the number of relationships to create a ranking (and puts the number in a variable called 'Campaign order number'):

  Campaign sequence number = the number of the decline in revenues

  The 'Order of campaign number' attribute in each entity now has your order in it.

• Create an Instance of the entity that is conditional on a screen

  We must stop to create instances of entity or to disable the creation of entity instances if the answer to a question from attribute on the same screen is = 1.

  For example

  If the answer to the question on a screen as - passport how much you care-> 1

  THEN

  Disable creation of more instances of entity on the screen

  Is there a way we can achieve this?

  I think that this can be achieved by modifying VM preference patterns - EntityInstanceCollectGroup.vm etc. where we can check the value of the attribute and therefore hide the entity instance collect buttons.

  But the problem is that it must be implemented on the same screen before submitting it.

  How can we achieve two things?

  Is it possible?

  It should be possible kertis, but you will need to write java script, the basic approach that I would take would be something like:

  -Listen to change that control the number of passports - hide or show the entity collect control as desired.

  -Save with an error event in the rules to ensure consistency.

• How to FTP an Oracle RDS instance to a server of the entity?

  Hi all

  I'm a newbie DBA. I have a task that describes to perform a backup of the instance Oracle RDS and FTP to a server of the entity. My question is how FTP this backup?

  RDS faq seems to say you can't do, you export instead, but I don't know enough about it to know if it's relevant.  Perhaps you should ask support Amazon or an Amazon RDS on board.  It could be a case of "If you do not have access through the dashboard, you can not see it" automated backup Amazon RDS - Stack Overflow

• Impossible to find a solution to control the next dates on multiple instances of the entity.

  Hello

  I have a simple scenario. I have two instances of an entity that match two records of a component of bussiness in Siebel. I need to put a validation that the date of the end of an instance is the eve of the start date of the other.

  Using the functions Nextdate() etc. can be useful within the same instance, but the way to check on multiple instances?

  Any suggestion is welcome.

  If you want to exclude from the last instance, there are two options. You can set a Global attribute to the start date of the last session, for example

  the date of beginning of last session = InstanceMaximum (sessions, the start date of the session)

  ... then use this attribute as a filter in your other rules. If there are some things where you want to run the logic on the same subset of instances (e.g., the subset that excludes the last instance), then it might be useful to create an inferred relationship:

  1. in the properties file, create one-to-many relationship overall to the session. (Relationships that will be deducted must always be on many-to-many.)

  2. give the new relationship a unique and descriptive name for example 'the sessions (excluding the last session) '.

  3. write a membership rule to determine which instances of the entity are part of the new relationship, for example

  the session is a member of the sessions (excluding the last session), if

  start date of the session< the="" start="" date="" of="" the="" latest="">

  4. When you want to redo the subset of instances of logic, use the relationship 'the sessions (excluding the last session)' rather than 'the sessions', for example

  the end dates of the sessions are valid if

  ForAll (sessions (excluding the last session), the session end date is certain)

  Using the cross-entity argument version of my example above, the following rule could be set to TRUE:

  the end dates of the sessions are valid if

  ForAll (sessions (excluding the last session), the session end date is certain)

  Whereas this rule would have the value FALSE:

  the end dates of the sessions are valid if

  ForAll (sessions, the closing date of the session is certain)

  I hope that gives you enough to continue their career with your specific scenario!

  See you soon,.

  Jasmine

• Create a concatenated string of attributes on Multiple Instances of the entity

  Hello world

  I wonder if someone has met this challenge, or ideas. We have been asked if OPA could produce a string containing the concatenation of the values of an attribute of text stored on multiple instances of an entity. The number of instances is variable, generally.

  Example: Assume that the attribute is "DayOfWeek", and we have an entity called "Appointment", with the authorities:

  appointment_1 (DayOfWeek = 'Monday')

  appointment_2 (DayOfWeek = 'Thursday')

  appointment_3 (DayOfWeek = 'Sunday')

  ... we need produce a string "AllAppointmentDays" = "on Monday, Thursday, Sunday.

  We don't think that this is possible without either: (a) an external system to generate the resulting concatenated string of the output, or (b) modules with the command of the approach to read the white paper Oracle in Nov 2012 (approaches to limits, thresholds and preferences), combined with hard-coding and the constraints on the length of the string.

  
  

  I was wondering if there was a better way to do it without external script or forced / hardcode.

  Thank you

  -Patrick

  I don' t know that an external implementation would be easier, but it could be more effective if well written.  Internal or external, you must decide how you want to classify or ordering entities before concatenation.  The order must be absolute (i.e. without fasteners).  Policies to 'solve' the first entity out of string and the string output of the policy to concatenate a string to produce this entity = the entity 'before' + ', ' + attribute of the entity are fairly simple.

  I guess the answer is: it is not necessarily a better way to do it in OPM and I don't think that there are constraints, or a more effective solution is necessary unless you already know you will work with a very large number of entities or very long strings.

• Returns the value of the entity instance inferred relationship in determinations of SOAP

  Hey,.

  I had an original thread open that indicates the problem I tried to solve (as several Conclusion based on input values ). My rules database now behaves as expected and I can test it in the debugger, as expected, only now I can't identify it the actual return values, I wanted by using web service determinations.

  
  

  I get a whole bunch of entity instances inferred from a relationship deemed identical to the situation/screen shot at the bottom of the page "investigate an alleged relationship" on the Oracle policy automation Cloud Service Guide to the user, but in my SOAP response I get that bodies with chopped IDs. I want the real value of identification of the entity.

  
  

  for example, now get this:

  
  

  <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:i18n="http://www.w3.org/2005/09/ws-i18n" xmlns:typ="http://oracle.com/determinations/server/11.0/rulebase/assess/types">
     <SOAP-ENV:Header>
        <i18n:international>
           <i18n:locale>en_GB</i18n:locale>
           <i18n:tz>GMT-0500</i18n:tz>
        </i18n:international>
     </SOAP-ENV:Header>
     <SOAP-ENV:Body>
        <typ:assess-response>
           <typ:global-instance>
              <typ:attribute id="course_code" type="text">
                 <typ:text-val>AHPY</typ:text-val>
              </typ:attribute>
              <typ:entity id="the_supplementary_documents" inferred="true">
                 <typ:instance id="0x608c2dc220e15d8c"></typ:instance>
                 <typ:instance id="0x5b7e2d02e8780325"></typ:instance>
              </typ:entity>
              <typ:entity id="the_informational_documents" inferred="true">
                 <typ:instance id="0x19387621439a43c7"></typ:instance>
              </typ:entity>
           </typ:global-instance>
        </typ:assess-response>
     </SOAP-ENV:Body>
  </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
  
  

  
  

  But I want something like below and I'm having a lot of trouble to figure out how to actually. Also is there anyone defines the meaning of the errors, you get the OPA? I tried to change my modules and I had a few mistakes of OPA-EXXXXX, but apart from the description you get in OPM, I can't find anywhere that gives more details on these and explains what they average and how to fix it.

  
  

  <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:i18n="http://www.w3.org/2005/09/ws-i18n" xmlns:typ="http://oracle.com/determinations/server/11.0/rulebase/assess/types">
     <SOAP-ENV:Header>
        <i18n:international>
           <i18n:locale>en_GB</i18n:locale>
           <i18n:tz>GMT-0500</i18n:tz>
        </i18n:international>
     </SOAP-ENV:Header>
     <SOAP-ENV:Body>
        <typ:assess-response>
           <typ:global-instance>
              <typ:attribute id="course_code" type="text">
                 <typ:text-val>AHPY</typ:text-val>
              </typ:attribute>
              <typ:entity id="the_supplementary_documents" inferred="true">
                 <typ:instance id="http://mydomain.com/mydocument.pdf">
                 </typ:instance>
                 <typ:instance id="http://mydomain.com/mydocument.pdf"></typ:instance>
              </typ:entity>
              <typ:entity id="the_informational_documents" inferred="true">
                 <typ:instance id="http://mydomain.com/mydocument.pdf"></typ:instance>
              </typ:entity>
           </typ:global-instance>
        </typ:assess-response>
     </SOAP-ENV:Body>
  </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
  
  

  
  

  
  

  I managed to get this to work by referring to this thread: deducted entity instance IDs following the release

  I had tried something similar but not quite the same thing. In the end, my application looked something like this:

  
     
     
        
           
             
            
              
            
            
              
            
         
           
           
              
              AHPY
     
            
        
     
  
  

• Re-evaluate the relationships after adding a new instance of the entity

  Hi all

  I have an 'X' entity for which global > X 1:M relations are evaluated on the screens. For example, after we collect the instances of 'X', the next screen ask you, out of all the X, which is a member of the relationship there. The interview continues.

  The question we now face is that if the user decides to add an additional instance of 'X' after having answered the relationship screen, screen relationship there does not appear once more.

  Ideally, we would like this screen once more, now that the extra 'X' was added, since it is theoretically 'unknown', they are also in the relationship Y or not. Instead, the debugger shows the relationship there is known and empty for the new 'X' entity instance.

  Is it possible to have this screen once more, once the new instance of the entity?

  Thanks for your help,

  -Julien

  Julien,

  The solution for this is not quite easy. Once the relationship is known to 'Y', the screen will be visited not unless the user chooses explicitly (usually data review screen).

  Event Manager solution

  A solution is to implement an event handler that sets the relationship 'Y' Unknown when the user adds a new 'X' entity. This requires custom code. See 'Events and event handlers' in the Guide of the developer of automation Oracle policy

  The entity implied solution

  Another (perhaps easier) solution is to infer the relationship 'Y' and collect information on the same screen that 'X' entities are added. This is best illustrated by an example.

  For the entity 'X', I'll use "person" global to the containment relationship no one is 'the people '.

  For relationship 'Y' I will use the global relationship person '' the special people. ''

  On the person entity, I have 2 attributes "name of person" (text) and 'the person is special' (Boolean)

  I have the following rule to infer the relationship '' the special people. ''

  the person is a member of the special people if

  the person is special

  The next step is to ensure that when you add features of person, they state "name of person" and "person is special."

  It will have 2 effects:

  1. the relationship "the special people" will be deducted, that there will be no screen to associate the relationship.

  2. for the collection of instances of the person, the extraordinary selection (or not) will determine members

  I think that the solution infers entity could be your best option. It requires no code and simplifies the interview.

  Hope this helps

  See you soon

  Frank

• in comparing the index and a table between instances PK

  Aloha!
  
  I'll compare the indices and the PK's (Constraint) of 3 instances.
  
  This table of s/n/s best use? The comparison is made on a specific schema only.
  
  Please be kind enough to write the script that I need or tables.
  
  PS
  Which is better dba_ind_columns or dba_objects?
  
  BR,
  Hades
  
  Published by: TheHades0210 on December 2, 2012 21:58

  TheHades0210 wrote:
  Hello

  Thank you for these elaborate explanation. I just want to know why under dba_ind_Columns INDEX_NAME, some of the names of the characters $ and #. Is it system generated index?

  very probably are generated, the system but not necessarily.

  If so, what application generates this index?

  I don't know what applications are installed in your DB.
  No objects appear spontaneously.
  Someone has published the DDL that created.

• Set the value of the attribute to an instance of an entity

  Hello
  How I put the value of one or more instances of an entity in the rules of the takeover bid.
  For example, if "Child" is an entity, then,
  For all children, if score > 50 the child then
  the child result = 'Pass '.
  
  
  Thank you

  Use a table of rules for a rule such as:

  the child result = 'Pass' If
  Note > the child 50

  A rules table is required for the text or the date of the findings like that in your example.

  Rules automatically apply to each instance of an entity that meets the requirements of the rule (i.e. the "for all" in procedure code is not needed in the rules, because the conditions define what bodies meet the requirements of the rule)

• count the entity instances

  Hello
  I want to count the entity instances. OPA provides the same InstanceCount() function. However, only works if the entity instance screen is submitted. I want to make it work any any point. Any idea?

  To control a flow on a summary screen, simply create a Boolean visibility attribute:

  the flow is enabled if
     InstanceCount(the thingamies) > 0
  

  Then, set the attribute for visibility on the flow on the summary screen "the flow is activated" with a default state of persons with disabilities (or hidden). Then, it will be hidden when the number of instances is unknown.

• By comparing the LabVIEW OOP class hierarchies

  Hi all

  The Question

  Does anyone know of a tool for comparing the hierarchies of LabVIEW classes?  (As 'Compare VI hierarchies' for .lvclass hiearchies?)

  For example

  Let's say I have foo.lvclass in both projects, and I want to compare the two instances, and their respective members.  One instance has methods that the other is not?  Is a method or differ from private data?

  Why?

  I have several applications with dozens of classes, which many must be interchangeable, and I want to quickly determine what classes are later, perhaps to consolidate some common code base.

  I thought about this announcement as a suggestion on the exchange of ideas, but I didn't know if I just don't see a feature that is already there.

  Thank you very much

  Jim

  Hi Jim,.

  It doesn't seem to be a way to do this. The nearest feature of you, that I could find was to use hierarchies of VI screw/compare compare to compare files .ctl for two classes. The LabVIEW help topic documents how to proceed:

  http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361L-01/lvhowto/comparing_vis/

  However, this does not really reach the feature you're looking for. Thank you for posting this idea to the exchange of ideas!

• deduct the entity combined with a relationship

  Hello

  I have a list of countries and a much larger list of cities, each containing a reference to the country that it is. Both lists are available in Excel.

  In an interview, I need the user to select a country, after which I want to reason based on the information of all the cities in that country.

  Because I don't want seeds before the interview with all this information, I would like to deduct from the country, as well as all the cities inside.

  My datamodel looks like:

  Global

  all instances of the country (= relationship)

  the country (= entity)

  all instances of the city in the country (= relationship)

  the city

  As a general rule, I would need:

  InferInstance (all instances of the country selected)

  All the properties in the country could come from the Excel sheet, which works very well. However, now I need to deduce an instance of 'city' for every city in the country that is inferred. Is there a way to do this?

  Any help is very appreciated!

  Thank you!

  Unfortunately it is not possible to deduce the entity instances in the Excel rules. Several entities must be created in MS Word table rules.

• How to change the user interface of the entity object indicators / Validation msg when running?

  Hello

  I use JDeveloper with version 11.1.1.6.3. Given my requirment details below.

  Suppose I have a (say 'EMPLOYEE_RATING') table in DB with the following structure.

  Columns:

  1 EmployeeId (Employee Id)

  2 RatingType (values can be in Stock or Bonus)

  3 RatingLevel (values can be 1, 2, and 3)

  Constraint:

  EmployeeId, RatingType and RatingLevel all together must be unique.

  Requirement:

  The customer's requirement is to have two screens of rating (one for Bonus another stock) and display different user interface boards and validations as follows.

  1 RatingType is a hidden field, are defined with the default (Bonus or Stock) based on the screen that the user opens.

  1. for the Stock screen, RatingLevel label should be "Stock note.

  2. for the Bonus screen, the label should be 'Bonus Rating'.

  3. for validation, the message must be 'Bonus note level must be unique' or 'Level of Stock of notes must be unique' ADB on the user screen opens.

  Implementation:

  I have a def EO (for example "RatingEO") and VO (for example ' RatingVO') def. Tips UI (Label) are given at the level of the OS. Also the unique constraint validation is made to EO with the message ' {0} and {1} must be unique, where {0} is source.hints.EmployeeId.label "and {1} is source.hints.RatingLevel.label.  I also did the shuttle two different instances of the VO (EmployeeRatingBonusVO and EmployeeRatingStockVO) in the request form (although BonusTaskFlow and StockTaskFlow are set to open with the new transaction, Intension of the two shuttle different named instances is to have the common code in VO. impl class but can run different business logic code by checking the name of the instance of VO)

  Question:

  Since I have two different pages, I can define two different labels in the jsff, but I can't change the commit message defined at the level of object entity based on open display. At the opening of the screen, depending on the type of screen, I should be able to change the label specified at the level of the entity object. (It should not affect the definition but only the instance). As this entity object cannot be distinguished (if it belongs to Bonus or Stock), I have problem on how to change the indicators of UI during execution.

  Any help on this would be appreciated! Thank you.

  Rami

  Post edited by: rami

  I tried your script.

  I created the secondary key with EmployId and rating level. I added validation of Unique key. In failure handling handling section of the validator, I gave the error message like: {0} must be unique. For token 0: I gave RatingType (here RatingType is the name of the attribute in OT).

  We give the default for RatingType as Stock Bonus in VO. kind RatingType get its value or Stock Bonus based on the original Version that we use.

  I hope this helps.

• Comparing the 2 attributes of lines

  Readers,
  
  I have 2 instances of VO in my AM. The two instances are used for the display/update of data on the same page. So basically I have 1 row of both the OV every time. Is it possible to compare the 2 rows to find data that is rare among themselves or basically the data updates without you know by comparing each one attribute?
  
  thnks
  11.1.1.5 jdev

  in line with etc,.

  If you wrote a base class for your line impl view and then made your view line impl extend this, then just write the code once. In fact, you only need a basic structure IF, not much. Something like this pseudocode:

  public Map compareTo(Row rowToCompare)
  {
  
  Map results = some type of new Map;
  
  for (loop through i=0 to this.getAttributeCount())
  {
     name = this.getAttributeName(i)
     value = this.getAttributeValue(i)
  
     if (rowToCompare.getAttribute(name) exists)
     compare rowToCompare.getAttribute to value and if it's different, then results.put(name, value) or something like that
  
     else results.put(name, "doesn't exist") or something like that
  
  }
  
  return results;
  }
  

  Then, you simply call:

  Map of diffs = row1.compareTo (row2).

  John