Comparison of nulls in where clause
Hi team,I want to select the data in the table based on some condition.
The problem is the data that I have to look in where clause is null or has a certain value.
The data are unknown so I can not use "is null" because if the data is not null then I have to use the '=' operator.
Please suggest a way to handle this situation, example below make the situation clearer for you.
I want data retirve that matches the current value of variable value1, value2, value3.
Name of the table:-DEMO(A,B,C)
A, B AND C
1 2 null
3 5 null
6 7 8
Select A, B, C of demo where A = 1 and B = value2 and c = value3;
Value1, value2, value3 are the variables that have some that can also be null.
If value1 or value2 value 3 having null that the above query does not work because I have to use to compare null values is null.
Please suggest me the query from right or procedure to deal with the current scenario.
Hello
DECODE treats NULL as a value, so you can do something like
SELECT a, b, c
FROM demo
WHERE DECODE (a, value1, 'OK') = 'OK'
AND DECODE (b, value2, 'OK') = 'OK'
AND DECODE (C, value3, 'OK') = 'OK'
;
Tags: Database
Similar Questions
-
I have a question (which I use for Apex, but I think it's besides the point) that has a where clause clause.
When: P24 is not specified, I want that she don't know where clause altogether, if flag is null or not.Select * from table1 where Flag = :P24_Flag
What is the most elegant way to do it?Select * from table1 where (Flag = :P24_Flag OR :P24_Flag is null)
?
-
Hello
I use a table column in the where condition.
For example. product_id <>1234 in where clause.
and the query returns results which have id is not equal to 1234.
My question is if the product id for a particular set (row) record is null, then only this record show upward in the result because it is not equal to 1234.
In other words oracle made the comparison "<>null 1234 so retunr the record in the result set?
Please advice. Thanks in advance.Hello
No Oracle would not return columns with null values if this column is used in where clause with equal/not equal clause (= /! =)
If there use null values in querywhere (product_id != 1234 or product_id is null)
Concerning
Anurag -
How to set a null column in a where clause clause involving a statement box
In oracle APEX, I a (selection list) element called: P32_STATUS. It contains two values of interest (for this discussion): 'Available' and 'checked '. In my report, I have a column called vc_status that contains two values: "Checkbox" and NULL. In my application I want to use a case statement in my where clause similar to the lines of
where
.
.
.
AND (vc_status = CASE WHEN: P32_STATUS = "Checkbox" THEN : P32_STATUS )
WHEN : P32_STATUS = 'Available' THEN NULL END)
The 'box' filtering works but the filtering to try to vc_status the NULL value does not work. Can someone help me? Thank you!
(P.S. My intuition says that there because I can not put vc_status = NULL, but I must say that vc_status IS NULL... However, I don't know how to do execution IS ZERO inside a CASE statement)
Hello
Your intuition is right...
In Oracle NULL is a bit special:
NULL = NULL is false
NULL <> NULL is false
Thus, instead of the parameter a NULL value in the CASE WHERE there is just set a value on the other side:
NVL (vc_statut, 'Available') =: P32_STATUS
That's all! Simple, clean and functional
-
Outer joins and null in the 'where' clause condition
Hi people,
Please help me on this.
Here's my query.
with x
(select 'a' as a dual union all col1)
Select 'b' as col1 of union double all the
Select 'c' as double col1
),
y as
(
Select 'b' as col2 from dual Union all the
Select 'c' as col2 from dual Union all the
Select would be "as col2 from dual Union all the"
Select 'e' as col2 from dual
)
Select * x y right outer join
on x.col1 = y.col2 and y.col2 is null
Get all the lines of 'COL1' as null. Why like this?
Just add the condition to the WHERE clause for example
WITH x AS (SELECT 'a' AS col1 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'b' AS col1 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'c' AS col1 FROM dual ), y AS ( SELECT 'b' AS col2 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'c' AS col2 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'd' AS col2 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'e' AS col2 FROM dual ) SELECT * FROM x LEFT OUTER JOIN y ON x.col1=y.col2 ----want to add "and y.col2 is null " condition to get value "a" where y.col2 is null
-
How to solve where clause matter when it can have a value or be null.
Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production
Hello, I am trying to understand how a query in which I have a where clause clause that can be null or a value, that is to say:
In the query, the gbl variables can have a value or be null, based on the results of a previous cursor. The problem is that if they have the value NULL, I don't get the correct results because where clause will have to be modified to be checked IS NULL instead of = gbl. Is it possible to do it by modifying select it?SELECT supply, duration, count, action FROM MDR WHERE (client = gbl_client OR (group = gbl_group AND section = gbl_section )) AND (prov_code = gbl_prov_code );
Hello
Because these columns are all strings, the CONCAT method will work fine:
SELECT * FROM mdr WHERE '?' || grp = '?' || glb_grp -- GROUP is not a good column name AND '?' || section = '?' || glb_section AND '?' || prov_code = '?' || prov_code ;
I think that the code is a little nicer with the '?' before the actual data. No matter whether it is before or after, just be consistent.
Published by: Frank Kulash, January 25, 2011 15:59
-
where clause to see if they contain the null value
So I've finalized my function but now am having some problems:
the bl field (or the v_bl parameter) has null values in it. When I run the function using the "Select FH ('ACCESS', NULL, 8675309') From dual; I get a NULL return value because it uses the variable to compare with q.bl and you can not have q.bl = null in a Where clause.
The main problem is when the parameters are passed, a line can have the same prob and site, but the bl might be different as null, which would give a different lname.
In where clause I need to have something that will compare the parameter with the bl field. Sometimes it's null sometimes is not, but we need to find the line concerned. I made the "BOLD" in the question police
Here are two possible lines in the data
prob bl site lname
ACCESS Smith 8675309 (null)
54321 8675309 Johnson ACCESS
so in theory, if the function is called with the parameters FH ('ACCESS', NULL, 8675306')
He would return the lname: Smith
and conversely FH ("ACCESS", "54321 ', 8675309") would return Johnson
Here's the function
create or replace
Function FH
(v_prob IN varchar2, v_bl IN varchar2, v_site IN varchar2)
RETURN varchar2
AS
v_lname varchar2 (16);
BEGIN
S.Lname SELECT INTO v_lname
Of
request q
JOIN THE
s response
On
(q.order = s.order)
WHERE
q.BL = v_bl AND - where it is
q.site = v_site AND
q.prob = v_prob AND
s.Lname IS NOT NULL;
RETURN v_lname;
END;
-When I run the FH ('ACCESS', NULL,' 86753) function, it returns an empty value and not the family name
Published by: user11210446 on May 28, 2009 17:03
Published by: user11210446 on May 28, 2009 17:03user11210446 wrote:
If v_bl is Null in the where clause it would even say q.bl = Null which will not work.Matches the NULL value
(1) either you have to say-> q.bl IS NULL
OR
(2) WHERE the NVL (q.bl-99) = NVL (v_bl-99) - this will be true if q.bl and v_bl both are NULL
NULL = NULL evaluates to TRUE, so you use NVLSS@XE > select * from dual where null = null ; no rows selected SS@XE > select * from dual where null is null ; D - X SS@XE > select * from dual where NVL(null,-1) = NVL(null,-1) ; D - X
SS
-
T/t with the WHERE clause using a list breaks
Hello, all,.
I have a project where I need to use a list as part of the WHERE clause for a t/t, and it is breaking. I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
For some pseudo-code, do I have a complete query of a database called 'people '. A list of values for the t/t with the first query; the second query is my t/t:
<cfquery name="getDIR" datasource="#request.THISDSN#"> SELECT thisName dir FROM orgs WHERE thisID in (<cfqueryparam value="#form.org#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar" list="yes" />) </cfquery> <cfquery name="people" database="people"> SELECT colA, colB, colC, colD FROM people WHERE 1=1 AND ( div IN (<cfqueryparam value="#valueList(getDIR.dir)#" cfsqltype="varchar" list="yes" />) OR dir IN (<cfqueryparam value="#valueList(getDIR.dir)#" cfsqltype="varchar" list="yes" />) ) </cfquery>
I get the error message is "t/t syntax error: encountered" div IN \'thisValue\' ".» Incorrect conditional expression, waiting for one of [as | null | between | in | comparison] condition. »
Can support _not_ QoQ lists of WHERE clauses?
V/r,
^_^
SMH - so much... I just found.
I forgot to give the lists in the second query bracket.
(The pseudocode was manually typed, since my dev system is isolated from the internet, and I added the in my pseudo code when they were not in my original code.)
* headdesk * headdesk * headdesk * headdesk *.
V/r,
^_^
-
How can I extract a substring in WHERE Clause <; CFQUERY >;?
Is it possible to extract a substring in the WHERE clause of either < CFQUERY > or in a query of queries? I try to use the following query to find all e-mail addresses with the domain "comcast.net" (i.e., everything that follows the '@' in the email address). I ask an MS-Access database table.
< cfquery name='test' datasource='membership'>
SELECT Email_address
OF tblMembers
WHERE the MID (email_address, INSTR (email_address, ' @') + 1) = "comcast.net"
< / cfquery >If I try this as a query, I get the error message "[Macromedia] [SequeLink JDBC Driver] [ODBC Socket] [Microsoft] [ODBC Microsoft Access driver] data type incompatible in criteria expression."
If I try it as a t/t, I get the error message " " Met 'MID (e-mail1.,. Incorrect conditional expression, waiting for one of [as | null | between | in | comparison] condition,'.
I would be very grateful for any help on finding something that works! Thanks for your help!
You couldn't do a LIKE in where clause instead:
SELECT Email_address
OF tblMembers
WHERE email_address LIKE ' %@comcast.net'
You should get the addresses you're looking for.
-Carl V.
-
TO_CHAR in where clause
Hello
Here's my query below. I added a to_char dates in my paintings (expiry_dstamp) but now my request does not take the "superior to" in my where clause into consideration.
Could someone ' a please inform me on what I should do now with my where clause.
Thank youselect * from (select distinct sku_id pfs, location_id pfl, to_char(expiry_dstamp, 'DD-Mon-YYYY') pfexd from inventory where pick_face = 'F') pf, (select distinct i.sku_id npfs, i.location_id npfl, to_char(i.expiry_dstamp, 'DD-Mon-YYYY') npfexd from inventory i, location l where i.pick_face is null and lock_code is null and i.location_id = l.location_id and l.work_zone not in ('DESPATCH', 'QUALITY', 'CHILLER', 'MARSHALL')) npf where pf.pfexd > npf.npfexd and npf.npfs = pf.pfs order by pf.pfl
SMIt is the taking into account, but now you're string comparison no dates...
Try this
select to_Char (pfexd, 'dd-mon-yyyy') , to_char (npfexd, 'dd-mon-yyyy') from (select distinct sku_id pfs, location_id pfl, expiry_dstamp pfexd from inventory where pick_face = 'F') pf, (select distinct i.sku_id npfs, i.location_id npfl, i.expiry_dstamp npfexd from inventory i, location l where i.pick_face is null and lock_code is null and i.location_id = l.location_id and l.work_zone not in ('DESPATCH', 'QUALITY', 'CHILLER', 'MARSHALL')) npf where pf.pfexd > npf.npfexd and npf.npfs = pf.pfs order by pf.pfl
not tested
Published by: Alex Nuijten on January 7, 2010 17:45
Published by: Alex Nuijten on January 7, 2010 17:46
-
Complex Inner Join and outer subquery where clause to join internal?
The DDL for this post was too big and I had to put on my site:
http://www.harbortownsolutions.com/DDLForDORTable.txt
My goal is to create a report of sales data for 116 stores containing daily sales and count of comments in recent years. My challenge is that I am pulling data from the same table, but with different dates to get data from last year and the week in data from date of last year.
The dates used for reports are:
SalesDate = 06/04/2009
SalesDateForLastYear = 2008-06-05
SalesDateBeginningOfWeek = 01/06/2009
SalesDateBginningOFWeekLastYear = 2008-06-02
PSEUDOQUERYS:
Question: Since they all use the same store of nbrs, I specify on each request? Can't I just specify only once on outer query Where clause?---======= DOLLAR VARIANCE = You Said you have $100 worth of meat(inventory) but you only have $50 worth of meat SELECT BUSI_DATE as BusinessDate, ORACLE_KEY as StoreID, FIELD1 as Sales, FIELD2 as GuestCount, FIELD3 as DollarVariance, FIELD4 as Cars FROM MYDAILYTOTALS WHERE Busi_date = SalesDate AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores); -======= ONLY Guest count and Sales are needed in comparisons against last year ---====== Last YEar dates = corresponding dates for this year ie Tuesday of this week matched to Tuesday of last year (except for leap year) SELECT ORACLE_KEY as StoreID FIELD1 as SalesLastYear FIELD2 as GuestCountLastYear FROM MYDAILYTOTALS WHERE Busi_date = SalesDateForLastYear AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores); SELECT ORACLE_KEY as StoreID SUM(FIELD1) as WeekToDateSales SUM(FIELD2) as WeekToDateGuestCount FROM MYDAILYTOTALS WHERE Busi_date BETWEEN SalesDateBeginningOfWeek and SalesDate AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores) GROUP BY ORACLE_KEY --======= SELECT ORACLE_KEY as StoreID SUM(FIELD1) as WeekToDateSalesLastYear SUM(FIELD2) as WeekToDateGuestCountLastYear FROM MYDAILYTOTALS WHERE Busi_date BETWEEN SalesDateBeginningOfWeekLastYear and SalesDateLastYear AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores) GROUP BY ORACLE_KEY
Also, how would fit the following of HOEK script:
See how I put 1 field based on another field value
He reads a record for each store of 116 stores in the database. There are 2 situations that have been addressed by Hoeks code:
For each of the 116 stores in the store table, there must be 1 and only
registration of 1 stock to match the record of MyStoreTotals. However, sometimes there is no record of inventory.
and sometimes there will be 2 (in a case where a manager of database updates)
After daily treatment) files. If so, the record with Is_posted = 1
is the one that should be included in the query. The following text accomplishes this:
-chr (39) is the single quote
Can I put this request on the place where clause of the outer to query I put on a JOIN clause?Select StoreId, DollarVariance from (select store.storeid, case when inv.storeid is null then 'None' when inv.is_posted = 0 then 'NP' else chr(39)||inv.total_dol_var||chr(39) end as DollarVariance, row_number() over (partition by store.storeid order by inv.is_posted desc) rn from myInven inv right outer join mystores store on store.storeid = inv.fk_str_main_id and inv.busi_date = to_date(SalesDate, 'dd-mon-yyyy')) where rn = 1;
So I guess that's why you used the MAX.
That is right.
I used CASES to identify and complete the necessary columns since the first set of results (WITH).
So then I more or less "swivels somehow" lines of this result set to the columns, each store will appear once the most. -
where clause to query the hierarchy in the tree Apex area does not
Hi all
I am building a tree Menu in Apex 5.0.3 (Oracle 11 g XE), when using when the clause, it does show all the data, but without him, showing all the data.
I'm trying to populate Tree Menu with data specific to a user successfully logged on.
(A) table created as HR2. TREE_MENU
menu_name varchar2 (50).
number of menu_parent
number of menu_child
menu_id varchar2 (12),
menu_path varchar2 (100),
number of user_no
(B) SQL statement for the tree in the Apex region
Select case when connect_by_isleaf = 1 then 0
When level = 1 then 1
else -1
end the status,
level,
'Menu_name' as the title,
NULL as an icon,
"MENU_CHILD" as a value.
NULL as ToolTip,
NULL as link
to HR2. "" TREE_MENU ".
-WHERE USER_NO =: P_USERNO
Start with 'MENU_CHILD' is null
connect prior "MENU_PARENT" = "MENU_CHILD."
brothers and sisters of order by 'MENU_ID '.
Note: also used static value where clause but is not workd.
that the mistake of me or something else? When using the wizard, she asks (possibly) where clause, this means that when the clause can be used in the SQL statement.
Help, please.
Kind regards.
If you want to prune your tree to show only the elements of the No. 7 usermenu, copy the following code helps you
select case when connect_by_isleaf = 1 then 0 when level = 1 then 1 else -1 end as status, level, "MENU_NAME" as title, null as icon, "MENU_CHILD" as value, null as tooltip, null as link from HR2."TREE_MENU" start with "MENU_CHILD" is null connect by prior "MENU_PARENT" = "MENU_CHILD" and "USER_NO" = 7 order siblings by "MENU_ID"
Concerning
Mahmoud
-
Cannot run a «BUSINESS...» WHEN ' with a date in a WHERE CLAUSE condition
Hello
I need to check for a condition and date according to the date, he would check a set of host names or the other game... so I thought I could write something like this in the WHERE clause:
AND HOST_NAME IN (
CASE
WHEN TO_DATE (: StopDate, 'MON-DD-YYYY') > = TO_DATE ('22 - DEC - 2015 "," DD-MON-YYYY ') THEN
('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC') ON THE OTHER
("SERVERNAME1", "NAMESERVER2", "SERVERNAME3")
END
)
I get the following:
ORA-00907: lack of right parenthesis
00907 00000 - "lack the right parenthesis.
But there is no missing parentheses!
If I take the case... when... end, and run the host_name in ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC') (separately, they run fine)...
I also tried:
AND
( CASE
WHEN TO_DATE (: StopDate, 'MON-DD-YYYY') > = TO_DATE ('22 - DEC - 2015 "," DD-MON-YYYY ') THEN
HOST_NAME IN ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC') ELSE
HOST_NAME IN ('SERVERNAME1","NAMESERVER2","SERVERNAME3")
END
)
the error I get is:
ORA-00905: lack of keyword
00905 00000 - 'lack the key word'
What keyword miss me?
Post edited by: c75d2e42-06a0-4eb1-a576-5652edcbfbe8
Hello
c75d2e42-06a0-4eb1-A576-5652edcbfbe8 wrote:
It was a typo when transferred to the Oracle forum... the version of Oracle is: PL/SQL version 10.2.0.3.0 (10 G)
I also used IF the statement and that has not worked (in error "missing parenthesis") which I'm sure is a matter of "syntax"... I did not know that the CASE statement returns the value single only, so it's probably the problem. Is it possible to re - write this?
...
IF only works in PL/SQL. It does not in SQL, even if that SQL is embedded in PL/SQL.
There are many ways to re - write the condition. And here's one:
AND ((host_name IN ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC')
AND TO_DATE (: StopDate, "MON-DD-YYYY") > = TO_DATE ('22-DEC-2015', "MON-DD-YYYY")
)
OR (host_name IN ('servername1","Nameserver2","SERVERNAME3")
AND TO_DATE (: StopDate, "MON-DD-YYYY")< to_date="" ('dec-22-2015', =""> >
)
)
If: StopDate can be NULL, it must be a bit more complicated.
You can also use nested, such as CASE expressions
AND THE CASE
WHEN TO_DATE (: StopDate, "MON-DD-YYYY") > = TO_DATE ('22-DEC-2015', "MON-DD-YYYY")
WHILE CASE
WHEN host_name IN ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC')
AND THEN 'OK '.
END
OTHER CASES
WHEN host_name IN ('servername1","Nameserver2","SERVERNAME3")
AND THEN 'OK '.
END
END = 'OK '.
I wonder if this in your application is the best way, however. If SERVERNAMEA was put into service on December 22, maybe that that fact should be recorded in a table. If you have a table with 1 row per server, you can consider adding 2 columns DATE to show when the server was first and last used. Then, rather than use a WHERE clause to test servers appropriate, you could do an inner join.
-
several instructions box in where clause
Hello
I'm trying to create report filters using substitution variables in a case statement in a where clause clause. I have several instructions box running on the same column. I don't really know how to write it. Here's what I have so far but I know I'm going in the wrong direction.
where
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone
of other i.compute_zone
end
AND
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone_2 is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone_2
other: P14_zone
end
AND
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone_3 is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone_3
of other i.compute_zone
end
AND
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone_4 is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone_4
of other i.compute_zone
end
any suggestions?
Thank you
MICAH
Hi, Micah,
User12611868-Oracle wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to create report filters using substitution variables in a case statement in a where clause clause. I have several instructions box running on the same column. I don't really know how to write it. Here's what I have so far but I know I'm going in the wrong direction.
where
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone
of other i.compute_zone
end
AND
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone_2 is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone_2
other: P14_zone
end
AND
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone_3 is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone_3
of other i.compute_zone
end
AND
i.compute_zone =
case
When: P14_zone_4 is NOT NULL
then: P14_zone_4
of other i.compute_zone
end
any suggestions?
Thank you
MICAH
How get the desired results of your data depends on the desired results and your data. What do you do? (I can't tell just by looking at the aat code that do not do). After CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for some sample data and a couple of sets of parameters (variables such as p14_zone) and the exact results that your choices in each set of parameters, given the same sample data.
Check out the Forum FAQ: Re: 2. How can I ask a question on the forums?
CASE expressions are generally not useful in a WHERE clause. CASE expressions are a convenient way to IF-THEN-ELSE logic of the places where you can't do anything other than (the SELECT clause), but WHERE the clauses allow IF-THEN-ELSE logic in any case
Maybe you want something like
WHERE MERGE (: p14_zone,: p14_zone_2,: p14_zone_3,: p14_zone_4) IS NULL
OR IN i.compute_zone (: p14_zone,: p14_zone_2,: p14_zone_3,: p14_zone_4)
It returns TRUE if all 4 parameters are set to NULL. If 1 or more of them are not NULL, then it will return TRUE if i.compute_zone is equal to one of them.
-
Hello
I need to use decode condition in where clause in such a way that if the respective column is null then consider the corresponding column
for example
Fee_date Fee_refund_date 10 OCTOBER 05 12 NOVEMBER 05 11 JANUARY 06 16 FEBRUARY 06 I have a request in place as below where p_fee_flag will be passed as either FEES or set to null, I check another condition as if p_fee_flag is null then fee_date must be set to null when comparing fee_refund_date between TRUNC (BKT. ACT_START_DATE) AND TRUNC (BKT. ACT_END_DATE
SELECT 1
BUCKET BKT
WHERE DECODE (P_FEE_FLAG, 'FEES', TRUNC(FS.) FEE_DATE), TRUNC (FS. FEE_REFUND_DATE))
BETWEEN TRUNC (BKT. ACT_START_DATE) AND TRUNC (BKT. ACT_END_DATE)
944524 wrote:
Hello Alberto,.
Thank you that's what I ask but is it possible to verify the condition even using decode
Yes, it is possible, but why?
Just replace the query in this way:
select * from fee_table f where exists(select 1 from bucket b where decode(:p_fee_flag, 'FEE', f.fee_date, f.fee_refund_date) between b.act_start_date and b.act_end_date) and decode(:p_fee_flag, 'FEE', null, f.fee_date) is null;
Kind regards.
Alberto
Maybe you are looking for
-
After the 4.0.1 update, Windows now creates a new icon in the taskbar instead of activate one who is already pinned there. This does not happen on other computers I've used.
-
Satellite L300 - problem WebCam: WebCam driver open fail
Driver Webcam installed (webcam - 20080519191643.zip)If the PC charge error: "WebCam driver open fail. Please restart camera or computer. http://photoFile.ru/users/romikok/135126109/137170363/http://photoFile.ru/users/romikok/135126109/137170362/ Wha
-
Windows Movie Maker-impossible to publish on DVD
I have a problem with Windows DVD MakerWhen I'm working in Windows Movie Maker, complete the work and click on 'release on DVD' when I hit burn everything starts working normally when the progress bar is 18.1% the fire stops and a new window appears
-
No scanner HP C3180 and Code19 in properties
I've seen similar problems but different solutions... I used HP Doc and fact following the instructions; then ran Doc once again and the message "HP Twain Scann error and made following the instructions of the installation: CPE_SCAN_DESTINATION_UPDAT
-
I have a site license, but when I updated for first CC 2015, it became a trial version
I'm running a lab with 25 licenses. Currently, all computers run CC 2014, because the new version became available too near the beginning of the semester for to feel me comfortable changing. I wanted to try the first new, I have so installed on a m