compiler options

Similar Questions

• Question compilation option.

  Hello

  How to compile optimization option

  / O2/O1, / OD

  Normally, you would use/od for a debug and / O2 for a Release version.

• -keep-generated-Question of actionscript compiler Option

  I am trying to learn how Actionscript works. I turned on the - Dungeon-generated-compiler actionscript option so that I could see the actionscript generated for an ItemRenderer I created.

  I must:

  1. directly modify the file generated, or

  2. use the generated file as a reference for creating my own ItemRenderer class file.

  I think, right?

  all comments appreciated!

  Thank you very much

  Mark

  You can do either, but there is ALSO the question of converters in the SDK that are

  better reference implementations.

• Additional compiler Option - framework?

  I'm trying to make sense of a compiler inherited project Flash Builder 4 option - framework.

  He reads

  -framework frameTwo com.domain.ClassMain

  What is that saying?

  The block option specifies to which image in the SWF file, the class is going.

  The default Flex applications have two frameworks: the preloader and effective enforcement. You can choose to put data or modules in the following frames to enjoy nature the SWF download/run continuously.

  For an example, try to download the project here Alex and looking at the arguments of compiler/code: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui/2008/09/using_the_flex_builder_3x_prof.html

  Alex uses - frame = three, Frame3Assets to images in the application of the third image.

  Thank you

  Rémy

• Compilation options

  Can someone pleas explain what build options are and where/when/why they are used?
  
  See you soon! :)

  Hello

  Patrick Wolf, he explained quite good here
  http://www.inside-Oracle-apex.com/the-quest-for-the-hidden-treasure-of-Oracle-apex/

  Watch the video, maybe you get other tips as well her

  BR, Jair

• Options configuration NOR in MatLab compiler

  Hello

  I am compiling a .mdl in a .dll file. I followed the instructions OR on the way to link this (http://www.ni.com/white-paper/13066/en) and it works fine.

  I'm curious to know what options exist under "Code Generation-> NI Configuration-> additional compiler options" in the screen settings in MatLab. I can't find any documentation on these options.

  I use MatLab 2011online and VeriStand 2011.

  Thank you

  B

  Hi B,

  We have not all compiler options that are exposed to the public. This field is mainly used by R & D during the development of software for debugging purposes.

• Compilations

  For these authentic compilations, you suggest have the artist field as the real and the artist as 'various artists' album or do not fill the field artist album?

  I have the compilation checkbox enabled on all tracks

  I always fill Album artist even for the non-Compilations, leave empty tends to create problems.  For compilation I use "Various Artists", as the artist of the Album, with the true artist is entered as the artist (and of course, check out the part of a Compilation option).

• Failed to compile without errors

  Hello

  Yes, I'm french sorry for my bad English.

  I have a problem with my CVI 2013...

  When I try to compile a simple project (1 Pentecost .c file a simple main function), out of my generation shows only 2 lines:

  Build status (test.prj - Debug)

  Build failed.

  Selected in the compiler Options compiler's compiler CVI Standard...

  I checked all the compiler Options and found nothing wrong...

  Please I need help...!

  Thank you very much

  
  

• Compilation of CVI2013

  Hello

  I'm still discovering all these exciting features of CVI2013, so here I am with two issues related to the compilation:

  (1) on the compilation Options / Configuration Options Panel, the check box 'Show indicators of warning in the window output to build' doesn't seem to have an effect: in both cases, I get the warning messages (warning level set to Custom). What is a warning flag?

  (2) the announcement of the new Albums of CVI2013 claims to build faster. My impression is that now, with the help of CVI2013 in debug mode, take it same code about 5 times longer to compile. Unfortunately I did not measure the compile time before the upgrade, so it's an indicative value only. Is there a setting I have forgotten?

  Thank you!

  Hi Wolfgang,.

  Thank you for the project. I confirm that we must, as you said, about 5 times more time to compile with CVI 2013. I don't have a reason for you at the moment, but I created a bug (#422103) report to study soon.

  Luis

• Problem of compiler SP1 2013

  Hello

  I'm using LabWindows/CVI 2013 SP1. I built my application and there is no warnings or errors. When I ran my application, I found that one of my digital indicators was not being updated. When I looked at the code I saw my mistake, and I did not believe that the compiler did not this error during the generation.

  I recently stayed at the update function, that I used "SetCtrlVal" to "SetCtrlAttribute". My mistake was that I have does not add the additional argument that is necessary to "SetCtrlAttribute".

  The compiler must have caught that there are not enough arguments sent to the function.

  Hi John,.

  You do not get a compiler at compile-time error because SetCtrlAttribute take as the 4th parameter a list of Variable arguments.

  The prototype of the SetCtrlAttribute is:

  int CVIFUNC_C SetCtrlAttribute(int panel, int control, int attribute, ...);
  

  This means that after the first 3 parameters, you can pass 0 or more parameters of any type.

  It is the same case as printf; the prototype is:

  int  CVIFUNC_C printf(const char *, ...);
  

  You can write to printf ("Hello") as well as printf ("Hello %s", "Word)

  Although SetCtrlAttribute needs 4 parameters, the last parameter is declared as a variable argument list (va_arg) as the 4th parameter can be of different type, depending on the attribute or the data type of the control.

  However, if you do not put the 4th parameter or it has an incorrect type, you should get a runtime error in the Debug configuration with Runtime checking active (debug level Standard or extended in the compiler Options).

  

  Constantin

• Xilinx FPGA target properties options is not available

  Hi all... I have a little problem.

  I can't have Options of Xilinx FPGA target properties to change the goal of optimization of the synthesis of area instead of the speed in 2012 of LabVIEW. Please let me know the cause and the solution to this problem.

  Thank you.

  Coelho,

  Interesting, looking to the right place for the compiler options? Compiler options will not be under 'Properties of the FPGA target' as you mentioned previously (sorry I missed this in your first post), rather these options can be found under the heading 'Options of Xilinx' when you create a specification to build FPGA for compilation.

  "" Click on build specifications ' New ' Compilation, and then select the Options of Xilinx category and you should see a window like this.

  

  Can you confirm that you are looking at this place?

• How detect you whether release or debug using compiler preprocessor directives?

  Hi - I want to detect if the user has set the ICB to compile standard as a release or a debug code during compilation.  Are there simple preprocessor conditionals to test this?

  Thank you

  Gareth

  Hey Gareth.

  The predefined macro _CVI_DEBUG_ will be defined for debug builds.  "" You can see the list of all macros predefined by going to Options "Compiler Options" Predefined Macros.

  NickB

  National Instruments

• Install the Borland C++ compiler

  I try to install Borland C++, well, I downloaded it from the Web site, and he copied a load of files etc on my C drive basis (not in the folder programs) but nothing seems to happen. I tried to run a sample, but he found nothing. There is a readme file that says

  1. run freecommandlinetools.exe; Choose it
  drive and the folder where you want to
  install the command line C ++ Builder 5 free
  system development tools.
    
  2. in the bin of your installation directory:
  a. Add 'c:\Borland\Bcc55 '.
  the existing path
  b. create a bcc32.cfg file which will define
  the compiler options to include
  and the Lib paths (-I and L - passes to the)
  compiler) by adding these lines:
  -J' I "c:\Borland\Bcc55\include".
  -L "c:\Borland\Bcc55\lib".
  c. create an ilink32.cfg file that will define
  the option to the linker for the Lib path by
  Add this line:
  -L "c:\Borland\Bcc55\lib".

  But what does it mean?

  I should mention that I am a former mainframe programmer so PC stuff is a bit of a mystery to me, but I can usually manage my way... but not this time.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/compatibility/Windows-Vista/search.aspx?type=software&s=Borland%20c%2b%2b%20compiler

  Read the Vista compatibility results above the different versions.

  Earlier versions are not compatible Vista.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Quirk of QCC compilation.

  Hello

  I'm trying to compile code that compiles well on PC/iOS/Android and fails with QCC in the IDE.

  If I try the following:

  typedef struct tPOINT
  {
  Tint Xc;
  Tint Yc;

  tPOINT () {};
  tPOINT (hue, tint XY) {Xc = x; YC = y ;}
  tVOID Set (hue, tint XY) {Xc = x; YC = y ;}
  } tPOINT;

  I get:

  /Media/OSDisk/dev/Raz0r/source/Raz0r.H:608: error: expected specifier-qualification-list before 'tPOINT.

  (The line of the constructor)

  I have a whole stack of other errors, including one for each class in my header files (even if it is a forward declaration)

  class RZFile;

  error: expected '=', ', ',';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before RZFile

  Is it because of the thought of QCC my. H (uppercase H) files must be compiled in C rather than C++?

  If so how to change the compiler to recognize. CPP and. H as C++ files?

  Thank you very much

  Steve.

  Thanks for the reply. It is a base of code with hundreds of files, to change all the instances of the code isn't really an option. Thanks for the reply though!

  It was as I however, the compiler does not seem to collect on. CPP and. H being C++ files, so I stuck "- lang - c ++" in the compiler options and it seems at least now compile.

  Thank you

  Steve.

• List of application objects w / Option generate attached?

  I'm trying to find the objects in my application have a specific Option to build assigned to them.  I think we're ready to let fall the Option generate, but I want to make sure that I removed all references to this first.

  I looked through the Application Express views for the columns on the page, but can't find an area that seems to include the compilation Options.  Did I miss something in the views of the Apex, or I have to look in the source code to find references?

  Thank you

  Stew

  There is a standard report in the generator of the Apex. See:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E59726_01/doc.50/e39147/deploy_build_options.htm#HTMDB25853