conflict of thread

Similar Questions

• Conflict DS_Open and Microsoft WebBrowser ActiveX?

  In the last days, I found a problem (or some kind of conflict) between the DS_Open and Microsoft ActiveX WebBrowser.

  On my PC (Win XP Pro SP2, CVI 6.0 with a later installation of the ICB RTE 8.1), it is easy to reproduce the problem:

  -Download the example from here dsweb.zip

  -If you run this example everything should work properly

  -on the IUR add a Microsoft Activex WebBrowser

  -compile the project and run it

  -When you press "Get Web Page" you have a fatal error in function RunUserInterface()

  could someone help me?

  I don't know about the problem of the icon. You can check the appearance of these files when you open the default directory in Windows Explorer. It's probably something specific system - but I'm not sure.

  On the other issue - I think it's because of conflicts of threading model. Try calling

  CA_InitActiveXThreadStyleForCurrentThread (0, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);

  as the first call in main() before calls to DS_Open or LoadPanel.

• Code Golf: stop two while loops with guaranteed ratio iteration

  Proposal

  In the vein of the tradition of Perl, I would like to see if there is any interest to solve a few puzzles programming in LabVIEW. Can someone post a problem and define the rules to solve.

  Here's a question for beginning/intermediate to sharpen your "palette".

  Description

  With a user action, how you would stop two while loops such as the relationship between iterations is the still the same? Concrete to view this situation is to take action: both instruments use the same source of synchronization to take measures, but second divides the clock down so that it is a little slower than the first whole factor. For example, if the slower instrument is four times slower, then at the end of the VI, the slower instrument takes 100 measures the fastest instrument took 400.

  Rules

  • You can use vi.lib
  • You cannot include any other subVIs
  • Your solution should pass for loop1 interval as low as 25 ms

  Model (joint in LabVIEW 2009)
  

   

  If people are interested in this, then we will find a way to improve future problems. Please post your suggestions and criticisms, but only if you also post a presentation ;-)

  MacNorth wrote:

  [..]

  If we choose the first suggestions, the VI has yet to recover the data at different speeds. You can dedicate a loop for each instrument to disassociate a jitter and latency introduced by their connectivity or the inner workings. This adds a margin of safety when there is a conflict of thread and the pilot. You can also implement a simple counting as altenbach loop and renounce the multiloop complexity.
  [..]

  It is a very good point. But I wanted to make sure, you should / need to discuss the benefits, but also the disadvantages of the design. Implementation of an application is most often a process of 'special cases '. If a framework/design for a single application model does not necessarily correspond to another application.

  Designs are always strongly according to the requirements and constraints. What gives here designs will result in educational services, of course, but not necessarily as reference models for specific applications.

  Advantage of simple loop:

  • No synchronization between several loops required
  • Can easily implement any whole factor between services (quotent & function remains for a case structure

  Disadvantage of simple loop:

  • Take advantage of the multi core systems (at least not much)
  • Can easily run out of the time constraints (material not "not responding" enough, fast manipulation of data takes too long,...)
  • Code will accumulate within the structures of the case, where the readability could suff

  The advantage of multiple loops:

  • See essentially the disadvantages of single loop (several loops solve those)

  Disadvantage of multiple loops:

  • More complex, especially for the sync switch (not beginner friendly, requires a more/better design)
  • May contain easily questions source such as race conditions and locks

  A little side note:

  Even if the equipment works different acquisition rate, this does not necessarily that the software must use different rates for data extraction. You can use the same model of an hour, but get X times more values for the task faster than the slower running. The 'only' thing to care of are the sizes of buffers and bottlenecks in the data transfer.

  MacNorth wrote:

  [..] The best advice published OR shutter multiple while loops (https://www.google.com/search?q=labview+stop+multiple+while+loops) are laughable (and the 'solution' in my model). [..]

  No, it's not laughable. For many applications, this approach to shutter at the same time several loops running is OK. The constraint: only for simple parallel running loops.

  More complex loops (producer/consumer and similar) with the more complex data relationship ships require more valiant approaches such as queues, declaring events or user.

  My 5 cents only,

  Norbert

• Thread: Function conflict, reference static VI

  Hello community,

  Sorry if this has already been answered before, but I spent an hour looking. I try to learn a little more about using subVIs to clean up my code.

  I'm trying to connect a static VI reference of a Gaussian function I made to the non-linear curve Fit.vi, but I get a cut wire that says "feature conflict".

  

  When I create constants for the release of my Gaussian VI and the entrance to the Fit.vi curve nonlinear, they are clearly different classes.

  

  Could someone show me how to change my Gaussian VI to match the class correctly? I would be very happy.

  Thank you

  -Patrick

  Your Subvi model needs a connector model that is identical to the model. Start with the model mentioned in the help and change only the code, not existing controls and indicators. Simply leave it unplug unused terminals, do not delete.

• Software conflict

  Hey fam... I have a serious problem. I think that the last updated OS (10.10), he created a software conflict somewhere. When I connect it goes into perpetual search mode, and then my machine just stops. If I sign up in any accounts or the comments of my children it opens fine. And to top things off to something which arrived at my back upwards as well drive. I just need to make my files. Can someone out there tell me how I can access my files.

  Thank you...

  Stop

  Disconnect all external devices

  start in safe mode and log on to the account

  Try safe mode if your Mac does not end commissioning - Apple Support

  Open utility disk (macintosh utility HD/applications/utilities/disk)

  Select the boot hard drive, click on repair permissions (if you misrepresented your last "10.10" instead of El Capitan 10.11.x OS then it will not be available in disk utility.)

  You can also start on the child's account and access your account files by changing the permissions that should not be taken by chance and probably not tempted until find you what the problem is with your backup. If you want to specify to include the details in this thread.

  In any case, that you can target your mac to another computer on disk and access the drive from another computer.

  Share files between two computers with target - Apple Support disk mode

• Satellite P100-354: Droping of frame while playing World in Conflict

  Hello

  I have a most unusual with my p100-354(geforce 7900 512mb, core 2 duo 2.0 GHz, 2 GB RAM) problem when I play World in Conflict I have way to 31 FPS in a resolution of 1280 x 800 and almost all the details to salvation, but I get constant image every 5 seconds to zero! for about a quarter of a second and all is ok for 5 seconds and the new framework fall to zero for the blink of an eye and so on and on.

  Strange thing is that Bioshock is working normally mode 1280 x 800 on high detail so I really don't understand what could be wrong. Oh and I have the same problem in Falcon 4.0 allied force (game 4), but only when I apply a patch to support screen (1280 x 800, 1440 x 900), so it is probably from material but I do not know what part of it? Would it be possible, it's the same problem as in windows vista and all 5 seconds stuttering?

  Please help I have downloaded all latest drivers and nothing helps!

  Hello

  I think that it s a Vista and world to the problem of compatibility of conflict:

  Please read this article:
  078 http://www.Computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9011 & pageNumber = 1

  It seems that games designed for DirectX9 don t run smoothly because of the conflict with the new Vista directly 10.

  To my knowledge, Microsoft has already released patches.
  Maybe you should take a look in this thread:
  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=24157&MessageID=95902𗚞

  Best regards

• PCI network on Equium A100-549 controller resource conflict

  I have an Equium A100-549 that stop to restart the computer with the error message:

  ERROR
  Resource conflict - PCI on motherboard network controller
  Bus: 02, device: 04, function: 00

  Press F1 to load the default values, F2 for Setup

  F1 just a loop to the same message, F2 brings up the configuration screens, but I see nothing here to fix this problem.

  There have not been any addition of material to the machine because it is out of the box from Toshiba.

  Any suggestions to get around this problem?

  I put t know what you did with your Equium and I advise you to install the OS by using recovery media delivered. After having this device will be updated again plant and equipment will be configured correctly.

  If the problem persists I would recommend you contact the after-sales Service of Toshiba partner and let check the device.

  By the way: close theme, you can see under http://forums.computers.toshiba-europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=16271

• Thread mode in LabVIEW 2010 bug?

  I had an application written in LabVIEW 2009 for a PSC-2220 who stopped working when it was converted in LabVIEW 2010, and I tracked down the problem to one thing: the software sets the mode of the Serial wire. Call this method simply disables all of the program. It works when you run from LabVIEW... but if you build an application to start it will not start. Remove the call to thread mode - and voila, the application runs as it should.

  -I can solve the problem easily by calling does not fashion wire method, but this isn't a solution due to the fact that I need to use the RS-422/485 port RS485 2-wire mode.

  I found a solution that I can live with... it does not explain what is wrong, but here's what I had to do to be able to run the init.vi serial port from outside vi.lib\Instr\ - which in turn allowed me to add the changes I need (set the thread mode) without having to edit a library function :

  I had to flatten, i.e.replace all of its report with their content... I could have tried the inline function, but did manually to be sure.

  This may indicate that something is wrong with the binding when the program is compiled with RT... but it happens without producing errors of conflict or anything either. A startup.exe is produced - but is not able to run.

• Conflict loading two LLBs

  Hey,.

  I'm having a problem call two separate LLBs of TestStand within the same performance. If I create a file of sequence and call other LLBs execution can operate without problem. If I create a file of sequence and call LLBs of both LLBs loading will fail and forms will give this error message:

  

  I made sure that all the screws that have been created in each project are only appointed so that they come into conflict during loading. But I'm not aware of what other possible conflicts that may exist or a method for the diagnosis of what is at the origin of the conflict. I know that the LLBs both contain some common XNET Subvi another common Subvi, but they should be the exact same Subvi and I didn't have a conflict with the other LLBs in similar circumstances.

  So, I'm not really sure where to go here to solve the problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Kevin

  Hey Kevin,

  This looks like a problem with namespace for me. Even if the components of VI are named differently in the LLB, it would probably still a problem. LLB does not prevent name collisions.

  I recommend actually change how you distribute your components VI as. LLB is a little dated and have some drawbacks. My recommendation would be to manage your LabVIEW code as libraries in the project (.lvlib) or packaged the project libraries. The last post of this thread by user Jervin Justin actually brings up some really good points about it,

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/NI-TestStand/what-are-the-advantages-of-using-LabVIEW-projects-in-TestStand/...

  Based on this thread (and the information contained in this white paper on libraries of the packed project) I probably recommend a packed library project would approach for a solution to what you are looking for.

  Here are some additional documents that you might find interesting:

  TestStand Help: Libraries of the LabVIEW project: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370052K-01/tsdeploysystem/infotopics/lvprojectlibrary/

  With the help of LabVIEW with TestStand (page 7-7): http://www.ni.com/pdf/manuals/375070b.pdf

  Honestly, I would try on implementing an approach to project packaged for your test from VI library as opposed to the. LLB. If this is not feasible for you, however, we can try to address the problem in a different way. Let me know.

  Have a great day!

• There will be a conflict between the two functional modules of a 2010 Biztalk adapter pack?

  Hello

  We already use a free version of SAP Business Suite (32-bit adapter) to suck SAP data.
  We are now upgrading all SSIS packages with the 64-bit Biztalk adapt pack 2010 and have few questions about it. It works successfully.
  Question 1:
  In my direct SAP, I installed the function module and my old 32-bit adapter works. As part of the migration to the new 64-bit adapter, I give myself with new functional module in SAP that I put in the SAP test area. To migrate all my packages, I have to start to move from one card to the other, and both must function in the SAP LIVE system module. If this is the case, will there be conflicts over the 2 functional modules working for 2 different cards (32 & 64 bit)? If my transition period is 4 weeks, these modules can still work?
  Question 2:
  If this works it cause any impact in the production SAP system at all? I don't want daily data extraction to cause an impact at all.
  Please advice. I'm unable to find any relevant article on this.
  Thank you
  Mani
  Original title: biztalk adapt pack 2010

  Hi Vincent,.

  I would have you post your query in the MSDN forums, because it is addressed to an audience of it professionals.

  Your request would be more out there.

  Check out the link-

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/sqlintegrationservices/threads/

  Get back to us if you have questions about Windows in the future. We will be happy to help you.

  Thank you.

• Wolfenstein: the component version conflict

  I get this error in the event viewer when I turn it on or restart the PC

  Source: SideBySide
  Date: 01/12/2009 06:54
  Event ID: 80
  Task category: no
  Level: error
  Keywords: Classic
  User: n/a
  Computer: George-PC
  Description:
  Activation context generation failed for "c:\program files (x86)\activision\wolfenstein\MP\ServerLauncher.exe. Error in manifest or policy file "" online. A component version required by the application conflicts with another version of the component already active. Contradictory elements are: Component 1: C:\Windows\WinSxS\manifests\x86_microsoft.windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.7600.16385_none_421189da2b7fabfc.manifest. Component 2: C:\Windows\WinSxS\manifests\amd64_microsoft.windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.7600.16385_none_fa645303170382f6.manifest.
  The event XML:
  http://schemas.Microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
   
     
      80
      2
      0
      0 x 80000000000000
     
      13745
      Application
      George-PC
     
   
   
      C:\Windows\WinSxS\manifests\x86_microsoft.Windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.7600.16385_none_421189da2b7fabfc.manifest
      C:\Windows\WinSxS\manifests\amd64_microsoft.Windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.7600.16385_none_fa645303170382f6.manifest
     
      c:\Program files (x86)\activision\wolfenstein\MP\ServerLauncher.exe
  your >
   
  

  Activision has no answers but advice on how to improve the game performance.

  Hello

  SideBySide errors are also caused by other programs such as Nero 8-9 and Adobe products. But a solution has not yet been found.

  Maybe this will help:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/itprovistaapps/thread/a4c36078-6419-4424-8a43-ff3832786b59

  Concerning

• Windows Live ID and password to enter in conflict with MS Money Plus Deluxe Sunset as well as with MS Money 2007 files.

  For several weeks now, I couldn't access my Money 2007 file.  When I type my Windows Licve ID and password, it says that they are inaccurate, which is not true because I use them all the time to access the internet and my e-mail address.  I went to Microsoft and downloaded Microsoft Money Plus Sunset Deluxe thinking he was support issue with a program abandoned, namely MS Money 2007.  (I'm using Windows XP as my operating system, by the way.)   Well, it wasn't the problem.  Yes, I can get into the new program, but I can't import my existing file of 2007 money in it.  There is always this conflict Live ID and password.  Why is this happening?  I noticed that others had the same problem.  I tried to change my Live ID, nothing helps.  It seems that the ID and password correct combination is incorporated into the backup file and the program does not accept it.  Y at - there a way to UN-embed in the file so it can be accessed and imported?  I have a lot of info and there is no way that I can remember every detail to be reintroduced in the memory.  I need this program!  Help.!

  YvetteSparks

  You could try the following forum

  http://social.Microsoft.com/forums/en/money/threads

• Conflict of IP addresses within the network of offices

  Original title: Office is connected to a router and modem through son.  Having a conflict of IP addresses in my business network.

  Having a conflict of IP addresses in my business network.

  (23/10/2012 11:32): Hi,.
  If I understand the question, you face a problem of conflict of IP address in the network of the office. Please let me know if this is not correct.
  You can check out the link and check if it helps.
  Get help with the message "There is an IP address conflict"
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/get-help-with-there-is-an-IP-address-conflict-message
  If the computer is connected to the domain network, the question you posted would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/w7itpronetworking/threads
  
  Hope this information is useful.

• Vista in conflict with security programs? Mega-slow start, ctrl-alt-delete = ' login process failed create the security options dialog»

  Hi all

  Have a laptop HP here with heavy problems! After the connection, it slows right down until it takes at least 5 minutes just to open the start - menu it hangs just with the whirly-circle thing. If I do ctrl-alt-del, the screen goes black and after a few minutes, I get the message "Login failed create the security options dialog» The Task Manager does not open. I managed to slightly improve things by disabling the user account control (miserable thing anyway) - it's just too slow, but now the Task Manager opens about 50% of the time and the other 50%, I get the message a little more lively 'failure - security options '. If I leave the phone that it will sort itself out after about 45 minutes, after which it ends to load every startup process and behaves normally. If I boot in Safe Mode, all right. I also ran virus checks - no nasties - and there is nothing surprising in the event logs.

  After an extensive search on Google, I have established that many people - all users of Vista, surprise, surprise - had the same problem, dating back years, pretty much when Vista is released. (This laptop is perhaps a year old). Some corrections were proposed, but the majority concluded that the deactivation of their safety programs, regardless of what they were, did the job. This laptop is running Windows Defender and TalkTalk Internet Security, provided by F-secure. Disable Windows Defender made a slight improvement in speed. Deactivation of TalkTalk Internet Security returned the laptop to normal operation. I strongly suspect a fundamental conflict between Vista programs and safety - that we must all know that Vista is rather prone to bugs - but why Microsoft hasn't issued a fix for this? I don't want to go around without security. Nor do I want to download a new program of security and have the same thing happen againn weeks down the line. Someone had the same problem or found a permanent solution for it? I am barking the wrong tree here? I'll try uninstalling a few recent Windows updates to see if any of those who triggered the hissing fit.

  Okay, I think that I fixed it. I will post the solution for you all poor users of Vista with the same problem. Corrections of spare is located in the following Vista forum thread:

  Error-message-login-process-has-failed-Create-Security-Options-Dialog

  So after that I've identified the cause was the Internet of TalkTalk security program, I did some messing around in msconfig and reduced to the function FSGKHS, alias F - Secure Gatekeeper Handler Starter. If I disabled this service, everything has worked, and if I booted up with no other process or running services to all others as the stuff of F-Secure (with the exception of group policies which I think is an essential service?), I had the same problem. Certainly FSGKHS. However, I did not know why. Everything I had was a vague notion that maybe it was a key to registry corrupt or something. I don't know why I even thought to this. And if I hate the registry cleaners, I couldn't think of any other way to identify registry problems. So I created a restore point and ran CCleaner. It came with a bunch of registry errors, but none of them were related to a F-Secure or files of TalkTalk. I told CCleaner to remove it anyway and booted up with FSGKHS running, just on the offchance. Whaddya know? He is cured. Don't know why, but it works perfectly normally from start to stop (fingers crossed). I know a lot of people have solved this problem by disabling their safety programs - maybe they had a corruption of the registry too? A kind of strange thing to register/security/Vista. Anyway, go try CCleaner before you reformat your drive hard peeps and let me know if this worked for you.

• BlackBerry Z10 Z10 camera and BBM conflict.

  Helllo there,

  MDB is upward and sometimes causing a conflict with the camera. Whenever I click on the CAMERA icon form the apps or form the status bar need me for my BBM! I can't access the camera is very strange, BBM icon is always on applications, but the image itself has disappear is there a way to update or reinstall? It won't let me download again because clearly, there is already on the phone.

  Very strange... Help, please?

  No problem. Mark the thread solved if you can.

  Good luck!