conversion of a VI of the version 9.0 to 8.6

Hello

Does someone could convert this VI of version 9.0 of 8.6 for me? Any help would be appreciated.

See you soon.

You can go there.

Next time, please post your request in the downconvert thread.

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • Conversion of sampling panelator for the version problem

    I can't get panelator to run on a non - dev machine.  I get the «...» Panelator.AEX' could not be loaded (14001) (48::46) error.  In the other samples fix by changing the regular, MDd MD debugging runtime library and compiling change _DEBUG for NDEBUG preprocessor.  In the example of projdumper, I also had to add a "_DEBUG #undef" line in the header file.  I use Visual c ++ 2008 Express to compile the examples.  Is it possible to compile the example of panelator for a release?

    Clinton

    I see a few problems.

    1. you use vs2008.

    the sdk is intended for vs2005.

    the main difference is that 2008 uses MSVCR90. DLL instead of MSVCR80. DLL

    that could be a problem.

    before you proceed to 2005, try to replace /MD /MT.

    which would cause the plugin to include all possible libraries in his code and it would be independent.

    plugin you throw the dependency walker tool.

    If you use / MT, should not be dependent on everything except of KERNEL32. DLL and that should fix this problem.

    2. some code of support can have contrary parameters.

    Check the properties of the files in the folder 'support code' in the panelator example.

    you might find some files that still have debug symbols or are defined as MD or MDd

    in general, windows XP service pack 2 comes with MSVCR and MSCRT version 7.

    If you are the plug-in is dependent on a more recent version that you place these DLLs on the host computer.

    VS2005 comes with version 8 of these DLLs and 2009 with version 9.

    the tool put dependency walker on the non developer machine and you will see that your plug-in is missing.

    I, personally use/MT and as far as the plugin regardless.

  • Open the version 12 VI in LabVIEW version 11

    Hello

    I have two screws that have been saved in LabVIEW version 12.  However, I am currently running LabVIEW version 11 on my computer.  I was wondering if anyone would be able to open these screws and keep them for version 11 for me.  It would be much appreciated.

    For later use, that is why we have the Version Conversion Office.

    Instrument drivers and a few subVIs Miss, but you can go.

  • Why the version of Windows 7 to Windows DVD Maker product a blurry video of Windows Live Movie Maker?

    When I do a DVD (using Windows DVD Maker) of a film produced by Windows Live Movie Maker photos are blurred and contained very low quality video.  The photos that I use in the project are very sharp, as is the video that I use in the project.

    The movie makes WLMM project is strong on the computer but when it is published on the DVD in Windows DVD Maker it produces a result blur this film as seen on the computer and any DVD player.  It's nothing to do with transitions because the film WLMM is strong.  Other DVD manufacturers produce a sharp image of the film WLMM even, but I prefer the way Windows DVD Maker makes the DVD with scenes, etc...

    The problem seems to lie with the WLMM. creating Windows DVD DVD movie conversion - are they incompatible?  This seems to happen with the version of Windows 7, everything worked fine with versions of Vista on my old computer.  I find it very frustrating to have this return back.  Please suggest a solution.  The version of WLMM is Version 2011 (Build 15.4.3502.0922); I can't find a version number for Windows DVD Maker.

    Update:

    Thanks to Irfan for a potential solution.  I did another DVD with all the filters off but unfortunatey it made no difference.  Having had another close watch the DVD video, the problem is to double everything up like a photo on a slow speed where you have shaking of the camera.  In particular, a girl with wire rim glasses has a rim double wire and even a girl with hair each double strand.  When further looked at what gives the appearance of an image finery.  Again, I must say that the film from which the DVD-video has been done had this failure and from DVD of this film by any other manufacturer of DVD Windows DVD Maker does not exhibit this problem.  The operating system is Windows 7.

    Hello Charley Farley,

    1. What is the operating system installed on your computer?

    You may experience this problem of there are incompatible filters installed on your computer. I suggest that you turn off the filters and check if you have the same problem.

    Video filters in Windows Movie Maker: frequently asked questions for Vista

    Video filters in Windows DVD Maker: frequently asked questions for Windows 7

    You can check out the link below that wil

    You can also ask your question to the Windows Live community to see if someone has had the same problem and fixed it. Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you:

    https://windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?ProductID=5

    Thank you
    Irfan H, Engineer Support Microsoft Answers. Visit ourMicrosoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • C# examples fail with "Failed to recognize the type of server or the version when connecting to the host"

    I am currently submitting work for P2V conversion from a c# application. I tried to run the application remotely and on-site, but I get this error message (here is the full error):

    "< detail > < InvalidArgumentFault xmlns =" urn: Converter ' xsi: type = "vim25:InvalidArgument" xmlns:vim25 = "urn: vim25" xmlns: xsi = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > < vim25:faultCause > < vim25:fault xsi: type = "ConverterNotSupportedConnection" > < hostName > RSMITH < / hostName > < / vim25:fault > < vim25:localizedMessage > impossible to recognize the type of server or the version when connecting to the host "RSMITH". " < / vim25: localizedMessage > < / vim25:faultCause > < / InvalidArgumentFault > < / details >

    RSMITH is the name of the machine with the VCenter Converter Standalone (5.0) and where I wan the VM to go. It's a Windows 7 SP1. I'm under .net 4.0 winform.

    Any suggestions? I'm pretty much run the sample out of the box, except for wrapping a winform around it instead of an application console.

    Cannot you telnet from your Converter machine on the source IDE oucederomsurlesecondport 9089 machine?

  • How can I download pages for el capitan? Only the version of the sierra is available on app store.

    Hello

    I already bought Apple Pages and Numbers for use on an iMac running El Capitan. Now I upgraded my macbook pro to El Capitan and want to update these programs, but on the App Store, I am only offered a newer version, which requires the Sierra. How can I get the version I need? Thank you, Robert

    Have you tried clicking on the icon in the Mac App Store to see what is happening? In the past, the Mac App Store will say that version will not run on your operating system & offer to download the latest compatible version. I don't think this has changed, but I don't have a Mac in El Capitan to try.

  • My Firefox has just automatically updated itself to the version 42. The extention under modules page does not display the extensions I have installed.

    My Firefox has just automatically updated itself to the version 42. The extention under modules page does not display the extensions I have installed. The plug in page shows the plug ins I installed. How can I fix it? This happened on my 64 bit Windows 7 partition. I installed the extension "classic add-on" to see if she could solve the problem. There is unfortunately no. I have a screenshot. I'm not sure if I have permission to upload it to the media gallery. I also use Linux, but I did not upgrade that are still there.

    It is possible that there is a problem with the files that store the registry extensions.

    Delete the files (extensions.json, extensions.sqlite, extensions.ini) extensions.* and compatibility.ini in the profile folder of Firefox to reset the extensions registry.

    New files will be created if necessary.

    See "extension corrupted files:

  • The version of ESR on the ftp site is exceeded - the ftp site is dead?

    Munki allows us to deploy the version of ESR of Firefox. Normally, we check the updates here:

    http://FTP.Mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/Mozilla.org/Firefox/releases/latest-ESR/Mac/en-us/

    However, the version here (from today ' hui - 10 Nov) is always 38.3.0 - and not the current 38.4.0

    This FTP site is dead? Or someone not the update? (One wonders if he is dead because the no - ESR 'releases' subdirectory has no consumer 42.0 version either...)

    Thank you!

    -Steve

    Hi steve, https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox is maintained for mozilla software download directory.

  • Why Firefox always tells me that Adobe plug-ins must be updated, when I've just updated beyond the versions them says Firefox update?

    On the status of the plug-in page, Firefox said I have potentially vulnerable Adobe Flash player c. 19.0.0.185 and should be updated. I have already taken this opinion but Adobe confirms that my version is 19.0.0.226. I ran the update at least twice (and of course I restarted Firefox several times and refreshed the page for good measure). Why Firefox think I always c. 19.0.0.185?

    Essentially the same story with Adobe Reader plug-in 15.9.20069.28170. Firefox said I have this outdated version and should be updated. I ran the update at least twice (but unlike with Flash Player I don't know how to confirm that the update is installed). The version that Firefox says I have and advice to update, has not changed.

    I've updated two plug-ins yesterday. Immediately after the update, when I refreshed the page status of the plugin, these plug-ins have disappeared from lists "vulnerable" or "outdated". It's only the Adobe Flash Player and Reader plug-in updates (which I did yesterday) that Firefox seems to blind. I waited a day to see if Firefox would recognize the edits today, but it still does not work. On this page of presentation of the question, "Assumptions" of Firefox on my current browser list older versions of Adobe Flash Player and Reader that I've already updated since.

    Plugins are installed on the system and not in Firefox. So he can tell you were the same when you installed know that it is usually because you have two system installed an older version of Flash Player.

    https://helpx.Adobe.com/Flash-Player/KB/uninstall-Flash-Player-Windows.html

    Maybe try to uninstall all versions of Flash Player (basic plugin) and install the current https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html (basic plugin), while Firefox is closed.

  • How can I fix the Player Plugin update? Whenever I click on the box to update and download the version, it still shows a red box in front of by update

    I'm trying to update a Plugin. When I click on the red box the Player Plugin, this brings me to the Adobe site in order to choose the version, language and operating system. I do and download version. It shows the version already installed. When I go back to check and see if the Adobe Reader Plugin has been updated, there are always the red box to the right, saying: it should be updated. I refreshed Firefox and that did not solve the problem. What can I do to update this Plugin?

    Is a situation like this, go to the web site of programs and check there.
    If the site says you have existing programs, that's all you need.

  • Where can I download the version of Firefox 64 b for Windows 7?

    Missing at Mozilla.org is their old "Downloads" section, where the different versions of Firefox are available for their operating system.

    I'm looking for a browser Firefox 64 b that is compatible with Windows 64 b. operating systems is there such a version? DRM for your help.

    For Linux, 64-bit was necessary as otherwise the user will have to install the required 32-bit libraries, he built themselves or use a package of 64-bit of the third of their Linux distro.

    There was also a lot of practice with the versions of Linux 64 - bit for some time on channel every night before the release of Firefox 4.0 even has emerged and they have mainly been used to catch the break since it is possible to break the 64-bit without affecting the 32-bit time.

    For Mac, it had and by supporting 64-bit from Firefox 4.0, this is one of the reasons for the abandonment of PPC support.

    Also when there is Firefox Win64 versions one will need Windows 7, 8.x or newer as servers, Vista, and XP 64-bit only is not supported.

  • After installing the version 36.0 whenever I go to a Web site, I get "server not found" and I have to refresh

    After installing the version 36.0 (yesterday) on the desktop and laptop, whenever I go to a site that I get "server not found" and I update the site to access.

    I checked my firewall and it is configured correctly.

    And I changed the proxy for 'no proxy '.

    Still not fixed.

    Thanks in advance.
    David

    I went back to the 35.0.1 version and it seems to have solved the problem.

  • I keep getting messages "Flash obsolete. Firefox Plugin Check says it is up-to-date with the version 11.2.202.418 but the current version is *. 425 cannot be installed.

    I use Ubuntu 14.

    These last days (say, a week) I get messages saying that the Flash is obsolete, and firefox blocks the plugin, so I have to unlock ('allow') every time that I get to a new page. It's no big deal, but it's boring and, for example, I can't watch movies on my page of favorite movie...
    In the firefox Plugin Check page, I get a message 'to day', but it shows the version 11.2.202.418, which is also the version of Ubuntu Software Center and current version is 11.2.202.425. I tried this https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/keep-flash-up-to-date-and-troubleshoot-problems#w_updating-flash for a manual installation instructions, but cannot get to the place where firefox is installed.

    I already moved chrome Firefox because of repeated malfuntioning of chrome, I have nowhere to go! (pity me).

    Thanks to you all! And sorry for the spelling mistakes / syntactic possibilities, English is not my first language.

    I think Unbuntu would have an update now that 11.2.202.425 has been out of Adobe since December 9 as 11.2.202.424 and is more vulnerable.

    Find the .mozilla folder at / and create a folder called plugins , so you can place the libflashplayer.so file here.

    Now, all installations of Firefox and SeaMonkey will be able to use it.

    Flash 11.2.202.425 tarball is to
    https://www.Adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html

    https://helpx.Adobe.com/security/products/Flash-Player/apsb14-27.html

  • It's the version of firefox I have 32.0.3 is an older version?

    Just got a message that I need to update my firefox. I have an IMac late 2007 version. The version number 32.0.3 seems odd and I don't know how it compares with the 3.5 that is mentioned in the notification.
    This computer has been updated to 10.8. According to the notification, this version is still reliable for Firefox to work and still receive updates. The 3 options do not seem to improve my situation. Any suggestions?

    Firefox 32 had 3 minor updates. It's very rare, but the stuff that happens.

    If you don't know whether to trust a pop-up dialogue box, which suggests an update, close the dialog box and use this method to get the update:

    • button "3-bar" menu > "?" button > on Firefox
    • (menu bar) Help > about Firefox
  • at the opening of Thunderbird, I get the message "Download 67 emails...» "but they download, if I can access them on the version of the Web site.

    All very well with my Thunderbird until recently, but since a week I can't two emails to download or send them except on the version of the Web site. On home Email I get the message 'check' Inbox then message "downloading message 1 from 67 to home email" as usual, and identified Business Manager control Inbox, at the correct time. no problem of access to the web version. Please can you suggest anything? Thank you very much!

    turn off email scanning in your anti virus program.

Maybe you are looking for