CUCM BE5000 to CUCMBE6000
Hi community support
as the title of the post says we need to be a migration of cucm 5000 worm 6.1.4 running on MCS server to a virtualized cucm 6000 worm 9.x on the servers of the UCS. I have some doubts on the procedure that I hope someone could help me to clarify:
1. I have read that is not possible to use backup and restore on this case DRS. so possible is a bat export on the worm be5000 6.1.4 and later to do an import of bat on the worm be6000 9.x?
2. what connection unit data? (version 2 does not support the "Cobras").
3. is it possible to install BE5000 worm 6.1.4 on a virtual machine, the DRS restore and then upgrade to version 9.1 for the "Cobras" support to export the data?
4. is there a upgrade procedure recommended for these cases?
Thanks in advance.
1. I read it is not possible to use the DRS backup and restore on this case. so possible is a bat export on the worm be5000 6.1.4 and later to do an import of bat on the worm be6000 9.x?
Yes, but if they are not in the same version, you will need to adjust the front BAT import files. You go just 6.X export and import is so easy 9.X.
2. what connection unit data? (version 2 does not support the "Cobras").
No work around here, you start from scratch or switch your 5K to 7.X, so you can use COBRAS.
3. is it possible to install BE5000 worm 6.1.4 on a virtual machine, the DRS restore and then upgrade to version 9.1 for the "Cobras" support to export the data?
No, 5K is not supported on virtualization, and apply the procedure to upgrade from jump. If you want to do this, it will have to be on the MCS server.
4. is there a upgrade procedure recommended for these cases?
Yes, Manish has already published the guide to 5-6K.
HTH
Java
If it helps, please note
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
Activate a call encrypted on SX80 recorded on CUCM
Hello community,
We have heaps of endpoints SX80 on CUCM. We are trying to activate the encrypted call but cannot work.
On the endpoints SX80 Configuration > conference set us the encryption mode on IT. If we try to point-to-point call, the call is not to connect. The two end points are set to Encryption mode WE. When the best value Effort it works but it says ' do not call encrypted.
Are there settings that we need to check on the side CUCM?
Thank you.
Are you using a non-secure telephone profile or secure?
To enable encryption, you must use a secure phone profile. See the "Encrypted vs encrypted communication" section the Telepresence Endpoints Deployment Guide for CUCM 11.0.1 (CE8.0) on pg 4.
-
Upgrade VM CUCM 8.6 to 10.5 Question
My situation is slightly different from what is shown here. I have a client who has CUCM 8.6.2 on VM... & would like to upgrade to CUCM Ver 10.5. What is the steps & the route easier to do this upgrade? A bit confused, with messages because it is not a migration, but a simple upgrade in the virtual machine environment.
Thank you
Lee
Hello
You will need to download the utility to the cisco site license number.
- File name
- LCUZIP - Ver9.1.2.zip
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-Comm...
Run on PC whre Editor is reachable.the file would be a consiting of CUCM MAC address, IP address, csv file installed DLU, DLU used / Unnused DLUs, licenses of BASIC/Essential, UCL Enhanced, CUWL standard etc.
Connection to the first License Manager, after having successfully migrated from 8 to 10
Use the following procedure to generate a licence application.
1. connect to first Cisco Manager of licenses.
2 in the license > Fulfillment page, select generate license request in the drop-down under
Other treatment Options.
3. the license request window and next steps appear. Copy the selected text in your Clipboard or click
Save it in a file on your PC and send it to [email protected] / * / to obtain the permanent license.regds,
Aman
-
Missing hash MD5 CUCM/CUC Upgrade OS on page
I have been through several improvements CUCM and CUC but, at least one of them I noticed he had a hash MD5 Checksum of lack and white in CUCM BONES page just as I started the installation.
I understand that if it does not match the checksum of when you downloaded from Cisco / PUT which is bad, but what happened when blank/lack just in the page of the OS?
Thank you
Dan
Hi Dan,.
If it is a upgrade file that has been downloaded from cisco.com you much download again trying to minimize the interference of the antivirus, vpn etc and see if the problem persists. I've seen a few cases of TAC where this scenario was known, but the upgrade went through and I don't see a bug for this as has been seen on different versions including 7.x. You can also open a TAC case to put the file published for you and try it.
Manish
-
Upgrade CUCM 10.5 and 11.5 with Mediasense, UCCX and confirmation of the highway
Hello everyone, I'm looking to upgrade CUCM 10.5 to 11.5 and try to find out if the version of Mediasense, UCCX and highway are supported and to confirm with the experts that I am mistaken.
Currently I have the following text:
CUCM/CUC - 10.5
UCCX - 10.6.1
MediaSense - 11.0.1
Highway - 8.5.1
So based on the documentation below if I go to CUCM 11.5 UCCX must be upgraded to version 11 and highway be upgraded to 8.8? MediaSense is ok here its version 11?
http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified...
Thank you
Dan
ORC evolving documents now States that UCCX 10.6 (1) can be compatible with 11.5 (1) CUCM (plus all patches) after you install the ciscouccx.106x.cucm11xcompatible.14.cop.sgn hotfix.
http://www.Cisco.com/Web/software/280840578/114618/Readme-UCCX-1061-UCCX...
-Alex
-
CUCM upgrade failed - migration 8.6 SU4 (2A) to 10.5 (2) SU1
Hello friends,
I'm trying to migrate SU4 Cucm 8.6 (2A) to 10.5 (2) SU1.
I did like the exception pre-upgrade tasks.
Changing vNIC, vCPU and taste-> rdht6 - 64 bit + resizing disks.
upgrade iso file loaded successfully.
Shortly after that the upgrade of cooling process in installation of position on the part of the installation of database component the process stopped at the 83 percent and performs reset.
That said the logs on the upgrade?
If he fails to step of the DB, it's usually something related to the info that is in the DB causing problems, but you must look at the newspapers.
And FYI, migrate means you either with PCD or move to a new piece of HW, is that what you do? If this isn't the case, then you are just the upgrade.
-
Hello:
Is CUCM on Azure from Microsoft Active Directory taken in charge by Cisco?
Thank you
It is not yet registered in the CSR 11.x design guide so official support is not yet available.
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/CUCM/srnd/collab11/co...
Manish
-
PEI - SIP - CME - SIP - error CUCM Media is not Acceptable
Hello world
I have a problem with a TRUNK of SIP ITSP, the question is apparently "SIP/2.0 488 not acceptable media.
I tried several things, I Don t know how to solve this problem.
Outgoing calls is already OK, the problem is with incoming calls: of the ITSP to the CUCM.
I have this topology of the ITSP SIP TRUNK:
ITSP - sip sip - CME - CUCM
The CME configuration is:
Dial-peer voice voip 67
Description * SIP trunk ITSP *.
destination-model 591 [67]...
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:172.17.0.13
session udp transport
voice-class sip forced early offer
no interaction of dtmf
Codec g711ulaw!
Dial-peer voice voip 68
Description * SIP trunk CUCM *.
reply-to address. T
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:172.16.6.3
voice-class sip forced early offer
Codec g711ulaw!
SIP - ua
Disable-early-media 180
connection-reuse!
voip phone service
list of approved IP addresses
IPv4 0.0.0.0
IPv4 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
h323 connections allow h323
allow connections h323 to SIP
allow connections sip h323
allow sip to sip connections
no service additional h450.7
no additional service moved temporarily sip
no service additional sip refer
Fax protocol t38 ls-redundancy version 0 0 hs-redundancy 0 help none
SIP
binding control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.5
bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.5
Registrar Server
offer-early forced!
On the side of CUCM:
End point of media (checked)
Disable the media beginning on 180 (unchecked)
Requires the idle exchange of SDP for call Media Change (checked)
Early support for voice and video calls (checked)
Send send-receive SDP appealed INVITES (checked)The result of "debug messages ccsip" and "debug dialpeer inout voice" is:
001062: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
GUEST sip:[email protected]/ * /: 5060; user = phone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.17.0.11:5060; branch = z9hG4bKi2mhl410do70mrc4s141.1
Call ID: [email protected]/ * /.
From: "70965999"<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = 2u2uavrx-CC-1013
To: '69200020'<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 69
Contact:
Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, INFO, BYE PRACK, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, UPDATE
P - asserted-Identity has:
Supported: 100rel, histinfo, prerequisite
P-early-Media: support
Content-Length: 362
Content-Type: application/sdpv = 0
o = HuaweiSoftx3000 1102026905 1102026906 IN IP4 172.17.0.11
s = SipCall
c = IN IP4 172.17.0.11
t = 0 0
m = audio RTP/AVP 8 18 116 10386
a = rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a G729/8000 rtpmap:18 =
a rtpmap:116 telephone-event/8000 =
a = ptime:5
a = sendrecv local curr:qos
a = distance zero curr:qos
a = sendrecv local compulsory are: qos
a = sendrecv distance optional with: qos
a = 3gOoBTC001063: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
Number = 69200020, called number = 69200020, Peer Info Type = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
001064: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
Associate the rule of = DP_MATCH_DEST; Called number = 69200020
001065: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
No outbound dial-peer does not; Result = NO_MATCH(-1)
001066: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
dialstring = 69200020, saf_enabled = 1 saf_dndb_lookup = 1, dp_result =-1
001067: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:
Result = NO_MATCH(-1)
001068: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
Number = 70965999, called number =, Voice-Interface = 0 x 0.
Timeout = TRUE, Peer Encap Type = ENCAP_VOIP, Type of research peer = PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
Peer Type Info = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
001069: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
Result = Success (0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming dial-peer = 68
001070: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
dialstring = NULL, saf_enabled = 0, saf_dndb_lookup = 0, dp_result = 0
001071: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
Number = 70965999, called number =, Voice-Interface = 0 x 0.
Timeout = TRUE, Peer Encap Type = ENCAP_VOIP, Type of research peer = PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
Peer Type Info = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
001072: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
Result = Success (0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming dial-peer = 68
001073: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
dialstring = NULL, saf_enabled = 0, saf_dndb_lookup = 0, dp_result = 0
001074: 03:31:03: //-1/CD12136099D5/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
Number = 70965999, called number = 69200020, Voice-Interface = 0 x 0.
Timeout = TRUE, Peer Encap Type = ENCAP_VOIP, Type of research peer = PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
Peer Type Info = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
001075: 03:31:03: //-1/CD12136099D5/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
Result = Success (0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming dial-peer = 68
001076: 03:31:03: //-1/CD12136099D5/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
dialstring = NULL, saf_enabled = 0, saf_dndb_lookup = 0, dp_result = 0
SIP: Attempt to analyze the attribute not supported at the level of the media
001077: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Envoy:
SIP/2.0 488 Media is not Acceptable
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.17.0.11:5060; branch = z9hG4bKi2mhl410do70mrc4s141.1
From: "70965999"<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = 2u2uavrx-CC-1013
To: '69200020'<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = C139A0-1755
Date: Thu, November 6, 2014 13:01:04 GMT
Call ID: [email protected]/ * /.
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Allow-events: telephone-event
Reason: Q.850; cause = 65
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-15.3.3.M2
Content-Length: 0001078: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:SIP GatewayTelf_JD #ACK:[email protected]/ * /: 5060; user = phone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.17.0.11:5060; branch = z9hG4bKi2mhl410do70mrc4s141.1
CSeq: 1 ACK
Call ID: [email protected]/ * /.
From: "70965999"<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = 2u2uavrx-CC-1013
To: '69200020'<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = C139A0-1755
Max-Forwards: 69
Content-Length: 0Little light at the end of the tunnel?
Thanks in advance!
Hello
can you collect debug voice ccapi inout & debugging ccsip GCE message and attach the logs here please?
your provider sends A Law G711 codec in the PROMPT message, but you have configured G711 U right in the dial-peers.
can you try to fix G711 has the right dial-peers and check out them? Also make sure you have TPMS in the MRGL applied to CUCM SIP Trunk.
-
Change the Authcode sequence in CUCM
Hello
I need a customer experience with CUCM match. Someone wants access PSTN should make up a code * 12A authcode then PSTN number.
I CUCM auth code always required after matcing routing model. Is it possible to change this sequence in CUCM?
Concerning
Saurabh
Hi Slim,
There is no option to have a FAC or CMC before dialing the number you are calling, please write in CUCM.
HTH
Manish
-
CUCM troubleshooting, I say if CUCM receives a call?
Hello
I'm trying to better understand and troubleshoot my CUCM environment. I have 11.5 CUCM, a CUBE router and a SIP ITSP provider as my connection to the PSTN.
I have outgoing calls of internal numbers, work can call and voice call works fine, but I can't incoming calls to work.
I think that my router CUBE is transfer of calls to CUCM because when I debug voice ccapi inout the result indicates the correct dialpeers incoming and outgoing are set accordingly.
So I think my cube tells me it transfers calls correctly but when I call from my mobile (cell) phone to inside the phone rings and goes finally to the voicemail SIP providers.
Is there any command I can run on the CUCM to solve this? To see if CUCM Gets the call? And then if she gets the call, why its not connecting?
Thank you very much
Tom
Well, it worked, outgoing proxy command is used to route the SIP Messages to the outbound proxy. You can even use proxy on each dial-peer.
Please note if found there.
Thank you
Haris
-
Hello
question, if I activate, single sign - on on my cucm cluster, this means, that I must use SSO on the all endpoints, such as Jabber or TSP? We use CUCM 10.5.
If possible, I would like to start by TSP uses SSO, and can also use Jabber.
Kind regards
René
It is not possible. Once you enable SINGLE sign on your cluster, jabber automatically detects and attempt to use it.
-
7900 and inherited on 10.5 CUCM gateway telephone support
Hello
My client is the migration of CUCM 7.1.5 until 10.5 CUCM. In my view, that a direct upgrade is possible. They have several 7911, 7941 and 7921 phones running on CUCM 7. They will build on CUCM 10.5? In addition, there voice gateways are 2811 and 3825 routers running IOS ip voice and spservices 124. These inherited gateways are supported in CUCM10.5. They function as gateways H323 and MGCP with SRST 1 gateway. I do need to update their IOS 15
Thank you
DerekHi Derek,.
7941 is fully compatible with 10.5 CUCM, 7911/21 can still be used with version 10.5, although there is no minimum firmware recommended for the same. 28XX and 3825 gateways, minimum 15.1 (4) IOS M7 is '' recommended '', no matter what lower firmware also works, but you can't get the other bug fixes and features of the new IOS with new version of cucm. Please see the following link for more details
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/com...
HTH
Manish
-
Upgrade of CUCM CUCM 9.1.2 7.1.5
We have CUCM 7.1.5 server cluster four on hardware servers. Recently, we have planned to spend this cluster in CUCM 9.1 on VMWare.
If we install CUCM 9.1 on VMs and make necessary configuration, can we obtain the required Cisco license? We have UCS for this cluster CUCM
We do not anticipate making Linux-to-Linux updated because we need some configuration changes in the new cluster CUCM. So our plan is to do a fresh install of CUCM 9.1 on VMs and migrate exsisting license for it.
can someone explain how we should get a license for the new version and what will be needed for this?
Thank you
I did the same upgrade path. After opening a case on [email protected] / * /, they will tell you to use a tool called the number of licenses of Cisco utility that will generate a report. So you send this report to Cisco and that they convert the existing licenses to be used on ELM. You can check the process on the attached PPT.
-
Hello
We have a CUCM on a UCS-C210 8.6 using the 7500 OVA (2x80GB, vm7) user. I improved CUCM 8.6 Editor (on UCS-C210) CUCM 9.1.2 but after the passage of the version on the Publisher, I had the fearsome "unaligned partitions' on the CLI.
Any ideas? I don't know why this didn't and workarounds (DRS backup/restore, change the EGGS) should not apply to the installation.
Rich
Way the safest is to DRS in a fresh installation 9.1 2.
-
559 http error when trying to add CUCM 11 to Expressway
Hello
I have a BE6000 running and improved a few weeks of CUCM 10.5.2 to 11.01 and the highway has not been rebootet after this migration and worked very well.
Now, I had to reload the whole BE6000 and now I have the problem of this highway seems to not be able to contact the CUCM server.
In the log file, I see this error:
2015 10 - 05 T 20: 51:10 + 02:00 management: Level = "WARNING" Event = 'Configuration of the Unified Communications Server' retail = "Unable to communicate with the server" Host = "cucm01.internal.local" reason = error "HTTP Error" = "" HTTPError:599"" UTCTime elements ="2015-10-05 18:51:10, 799"
Through webbrowser, I have no problem to access the server of CUCM - so CallManager itself seems to work normally.
Anyone had this issue before? What is associated with CUCM 11.01 with Highway X8.5.1?
Thank you
Thomas
Which is related to this bug
CSCus60569 Remove the version 8.x of axl
You must upgrade to x8.6 for CUCM 11.x to work.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Satellite M60 and the display driver installation
Help people to the display driver "installation cannot continue because the size of the specified directory path and the name of the installation folder exceeds 88 characters.Shorten one or both of the limit specified below and try again"! that to me
-
I just upgraded my ipod touch to ios 9.1 5 and he used to upgrade silde
This morning I upgraded to ios 9.1 and it went through, but before you use it you have to slide to the upgrade and it does not work and it won't let me drag
-
Hello!Does anyone know the module allows you to configure a full control over the actions of the users ' who does what' (WHO, and this file was accessed, who has created, deleted, or renamed a particular file or directory)? (RN104, latest firmware)
-
Why can't join me Xbox live beta test for this fall?
When I went to xbox.com/beta and connected using my Windows ID, it took me to a page saying that I had to fill out the rest of my registration and so I clicked on continue it took a 400 Bad request error URL, and every single link on this page have d
-
I accidentally shut down my computer for an update. Now I can only get a blue screen with a message saying that a problem has been detected and I need to disable or uninstall any anti-virus, backup utilities or disk defragmentation. He told me to c