Upgrade of CUCM CUCM 9.1.2 7.1.5

Similar Questions

• Upgrade VM CUCM 8.6 to 10.5 Question

  My situation is slightly different from what is shown here. I have a client who has CUCM 8.6.2 on VM... & would like to upgrade to CUCM Ver 10.5. What is the steps & the route easier to do this upgrade? A bit confused, with messages because it is not a migration, but a simple upgrade in the virtual machine environment.

  Thank you

  Lee

  Hello

  You will need to download the utility to the cisco site license number.

  File name

  LCUZIP - Ver9.1.2.zip

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-Comm...

  Run on PC whre Editor is reachable.the file would be a consiting of CUCM MAC address, IP address, csv file installed DLU, DLU used / Unnused DLUs, licenses of BASIC/Essential, UCL Enhanced, CUWL standard etc.

  Connection to the first License Manager, after having successfully migrated from 8 to 10

  Use the following procedure to generate a licence application.
  1. connect to first Cisco Manager of licenses.
  2 in the license > Fulfillment page, select generate license request in the drop-down under
  Other treatment Options.
  3. the license request window and next steps appear. Copy the selected text in your Clipboard or click
  Save it in a file on your PC and send it to [email protected] / * / to obtain the permanent license.

  regds,

  Aman

• Upgrade of CUCM 7.1.5 to 9.1 (contract No. UCS and ESW)

  Hello

  We have CUCM 7.1.5 cluster (two servers) without contract UCS and ESW.

  What would be the better and way cheaper to upgrade to CUCM 9.1.

  We intend to use our VMWare system and only buy the CUCM 9.1 software (not servers).

  The current DLU is trensfered or should we buy everything from scratch.

  Kind regards.

  Demont - my friend, how have you been? I hope you do well!  Very nice to see you

  always help others - keep it! (+ 5)

  Kasper,

  As my friend that Demont said accurately, you contact your partner Cisco Channel/Account Manager. I just wanted to add, you can migrate DLU, but like with CUCM9, you have only UCL or CUWL - according to the type of license you select UCL/CUWL, you will need to purchase additional licenses and buy the UCS. But having said that you can benefit from Cisco in the car at 9 and can buy this at a really discounted price. Your Cisco representative can explain all the options in detail.

  Thank you

  Terry

• Upgrade domain CUCM 8.6.2 level

  Hello

  We lack a level of Windows 2008 domain at the moment with CUCM 8.6.2 and LDAP synchronization. We would like to upgrade to domainlevel 2008R2.

  I don't think that this will cause no problems because I'm under 2008R2 in my lab too, but just to be sure that this will have an impact on a lot of phones. There may be potential problems? Everything I need to know, or just a simple upgrade, which would have no impact on the CUCM?

  Thank you for a short answer

  concerning

  Marc

  Hello

  Switching the domain functional level upwards or a forest will have no effect on the integration of LDAP.

  Concerning

  Aaron

• Upgrade CUCM 9 to 10

  While I intend to improve CUCM from 9 to 10, understand that I need to generate the v9 ELM licence application and send to Cisco to generate the v10 license key.

  Would like to confirm the license generate demand can be performed on CUCM v9 ELM before moving on to v10 PLM.

  Your inputs are appreciated!

  Roy

  Hi Roy,

  It is not so with CUCM9.

  After u upgrade to CUCM 9, you must share the generated CUCM9 file so that you can obtain the permanent license file.

  You need to share the file LCU before migrating to CUCM9. This file contacted PUB CUCM 7/8 to get the number of users of BASIC/Essential/CUWL Std.

  regds,

  Aman

• RTMT CFS alert critical after upgrade to 7.1.5.34900 - 7 CUCM

  I just upgraded our CUCM 11 Server 7.1.3 to CUCM 7.1.5.34900 cluster - 7, which was on the whole successful

  However, I am now regularly get an alert every hour about RTMT associated with CSA (see text below). Each alert always coming from the editor and returns to the other servers in the cluster, but not necessarily the same server. I restarted the publication server, which made no difference. As far as I know, there is no impact, it's just a little embarrassing to see the alerts are displayed.

  Has anyone seen something similar?

  I'll happily re - start the entire cluster once more if I thought it might solve the problem, but our process of internal change to a server re-boot is a pain I want to avoid!

  dec 17 15:35:43 CUCM-PUB local4 02:28: CUCM-PUB: December 17, 2012 15:35:43.429 + 0000: % CSA-2-EVENT_CLIM_DENY: % [PID = 4325] [component = CiscoSecurityAgent]: the process of ' / usr/local/platform/bin/clm/clm ' (as user root (0) root group (0)) tries to establish a TCP connection with 10.10.10.12 on port 8500 and exceeded the limit of the specific rate of 100 connections in 1 minutes. The operation was refused. [rule 2050]

  Concerning

  Kelvin

  Hi Kelvin

  You can try restarting the Cluster Manager service for some your nodes for which you found alarms. To restart the Cluster service manager use the following command:

  Restarting the service Cluster Manager utils

  Concerning

  Aditya Gupta

• CUCM 9.1.2 to 10.5 upgrade

  Hi all

  I tested reclassification CUCM 9.1.2 to 10.5 in my lab. As I read before, we need some COP files to download CUCM before the upgrade procedure.

  Cisco has named this upgrade as , and during this process, version RHEL modernize also with CUCM version.

  On my test, I do not download any file of the Conference of the parties before the upgrade. Uprade to version 10.5.

  Before upgrading my RHEL version was 5 (32-bit), and after the upgrade, it is 6(64 bit).

  After upgrade, everything seems ok, but upgrade took a long time, like 4 hours.

  During the upgrade, there is no link with CUCM and blue screen, I saw :)

  What is your opinion? This method works on the customer's environment?

  You test this procedure before?

  Best regards

  Mesut

  Hi Martin,

  I have never upgraded of CUCM 9 to 10 but made a migration of CUCM 7 to 9, which took nearly 7 hours for a single server. So, if you have two servers in a cluster, your time would be app.13 to 14 hours, which of course depends on your /configs DB.

  In addition, I was checking the upgrade path for the files of the Conference of the parties, but I have found no such requirement CDP file before the upgrade of CUCM 10 of 9.1.2

  regds,

  Aman

• CUCM NTP

  We have recently upgraded to CUCM 11.5. Time of his installation, our provider part a ntp server we do not. Once I found out, I gave him the correct IP address and he entered this one in. I asked him if we could remove the original that he came and he told me that if we did, we would have to re - authorize the server. All our phones are grabbing the time elapsed between the wrong server. It is true that I have to re-license it if I delete this first address?

  Hello

  with 11.5 you would be running PLM, there is no need to re - host licenses for changes in NTp. But before making any changes just NTP for the love of attention, delete the instance of PLM product and add the same.

  PLM explained below.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/12229791/understanding-Cisco-PR...

  JB

• CUCM 7.1 (3) TFTP Auth Fail

  Since the upgrade of CUCM 7.1.3.10000 - 11 all new phone plugged into the system gets an 'auth fail"from the TFTP server when you try to upgrade the firmware to the version that comes with 7.1 (3). Phones that were saved before the upgrade work fine. I see the same behanviour on our non-production environment, which is also in 7.1.3 - 10000-11.

  Firmware of the phone for a 7.1 (3) on the plateau of 7961G is SCCP41.8 - 5-2SR1S

  Someone at - sle seen this behavior before... did someone else turns 7.1 (3) yet?

  Hello world

  My problem was that the Firmware of the phone must first be 8.5.2 and after that, the phone can go to 8.5.3. What is written in the Relase Notes

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_3/English/release/notes/7900_853.html

  Concerning

• MX300 CUCM 8.6.2 press

  Hello

  MX300 is not listed in CUCM worm 8.6.2

  I think that device pack required in order to support this devices.

  Suppose that if I install the devices 'cmterm - devicepack8.6.2.23047 - 1.cop.sgn' pack or a later version.

  It upgrades all other phones firmware load.

  Problem is, we do not want to update other firmware of phone models. We want to just add pack devices for MX300

  Is a feature available to the cisco site or TAC pack for only MX300?

  Also, if I add any pack of devices for the new management device, and then restart the cluster is mandatory?

  MX300 is runing worm TC 5.x

  Suggest pls.

  Thank you

  Rgds

  Rajesh Kumar

  Renon,

  What is the exact version of CUCM you use? The Quick reference guide documents that you are forced to use pack if you are under 8.6.2.21020. You have to restart each server in the cluster (after having installed the device on each pack) in order for the MX300s to be able to join the group later. There is no other way that I know that wouldn't give you MX300 support such as a package only for the MX300, in addition to the upgrade of CUCM himself.

  Regarding loads default phone which should be upgraded, the 8.6.2 release notes pack devices say in the uninstall instructions even if you can't remove the pack, you can reset loads of phone by default to their initial values. Also, you should be able to manually set loads of individual phone on every profile of the unit to keep him from using the default value, if it is feasible.

  Tyler Walker

  TAC TelePresence

• CUCM 9.1.2-> 10.5 failure (2)

  Hi all

  I am trying to upgrade our CUCM 9.1.2 (SU2)--> 10.5 (2) (UCSInstall_UCOS_10.5.2.10000 - 5.sgn.iso)

  I believe that I made the requirements of upgrade:

  • Our equipment is Cisco UCS with old 'Medium' UCS tested baseline for 2500 users. Each node has 2 x vCPUs.

  • 9.1.2 (SU2) tp 10.5 (2) is described as a "Direct Upgrade.

  • I have / had at least 30 GB of free in the common partition on each node

  • ciscocm.Version3 - keys.cop has been installed on all nodes

  • I have not installed the file COP refresh_upgrade, I'm upgrading to 9.1.2 (i.e. no pre version 8.5)

  • The specification of the virtual machine meets all the conditions for 10.5 (2)

  Installation goes for about 1.5-2 hours before it is "Post-installation" tasks where is fails at the point 6 or 6 of "Installation component database.

  E installation log shows:

  24/01/2015-17:24:02 component_install | File: / opt/Cisco / install/bin/component_install:807, function: exec_progmeter(), / opt/cisco/install/bin/progmeter has not (1) |

  24/01/2015-17:24:02 appmanager.sh | Error function, File:/usr/local/bin/base_scripts/appmanager.sh:273, internal: refresh_upgrade(), does not have refresh_upgrade components infrastructure_post |

  24/01/2015-17:24:02 post_install | File: / opt/Cisco / install/bin/post_install:961, function: install_applications(), /usr/local/bin/base_scripts/appmanager.sh-r-mise at level failed (1) |

  24/01/2015-17:24:02 post_install | Output with result 1 |

  24/01/2015-17:24:02 post_install | INSTALL_TYPE = "refresh upgrade |

  It seems very similar to the Cisco support forum question: https://supportforums.cisco.com/printpdf/12334191; However, I was able to remove the AUNP numbering plan; I suspect because I have a number of models road, use it and do not want to delete.

  I have improved the numbering plan in an attempt to address the issue, but the upgrade still does not work.

  Any ideas would be very appreciated.

  Thank you

  Kent

  I encountered this problem on several upgrades and still fear to see a xxNP in use, how I work around this problem is by exporting the bosses of the route, Bulk Administration > export and select from there.

  TAC will then need to get Root access to remove the xxNP (all) and then the upgrade will succeed.

  Once the upgrade is complete and you have installed the xxNP that you need then to export models of road again from the Server v10.x because you will need to change the header.txt stored in the .tar file. Copy "CCM: master - 10.5.1.11901 - 1.i386' 10.x export item and replace the one exporting 9.x."

  You can then import the 9.x CUCM CUCM 10.x road models

  Hope this helps,

  Richard

• Missing hash MD5 CUCM/CUC Upgrade OS on page

  I have been through several improvements CUCM and CUC but, at least one of them I noticed he had a hash MD5 Checksum of lack and white in CUCM BONES page just as I started the installation.

  I understand that if it does not match the checksum of when you downloaded from Cisco / PUT which is bad, but what happened when blank/lack just in the page of the OS?

  Thank you

  Dan

  Hi Dan,.

  If it is a upgrade file that has been downloaded from cisco.com you much download again trying to minimize the interference of the antivirus, vpn etc and see if the problem persists. I've seen a few cases of TAC where this scenario was known, but the upgrade went through and I don't see a bug for this as has been seen on different versions including 7.x. You can also open a TAC case to put the file published for you and try it.

  Manish

• Upgrade CUCM 10.5 and 11.5 with Mediasense, UCCX and confirmation of the highway

  Hello everyone, I'm looking to upgrade CUCM 10.5 to 11.5 and try to find out if the version of Mediasense, UCCX and highway are supported and to confirm with the experts that I am mistaken.

  Currently I have the following text:

  CUCM/CUC - 10.5

  UCCX - 10.6.1

  MediaSense - 11.0.1

  Highway - 8.5.1

  So based on the documentation below if I go to CUCM 11.5 UCCX must be upgraded to version 11 and highway be upgraded to 8.8? MediaSense is ok here its version 11?

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified...

  Thank you

  Dan

  ORC evolving documents now States that UCCX 10.6 (1) can be compatible with 11.5 (1) CUCM (plus all patches) after you install the ciscouccx.106x.cucm11xcompatible.14.cop.sgn hotfix.

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/software/280840578/114618/Readme-UCCX-1061-UCCX...

  -Alex

• CUCM upgrade failed - migration 8.6 SU4 (2A) to 10.5 (2) SU1

  Hello friends,

  I'm trying to migrate SU4 Cucm 8.6 (2A) to 10.5 (2) SU1.

  I did like the exception pre-upgrade tasks.

  Changing vNIC, vCPU and taste-> rdht6 - 64 bit + resizing disks.

  upgrade iso file loaded successfully.

  Shortly after that the upgrade of cooling process in installation of position on the part of the installation of database component the process stopped at the 83 percent and performs reset.

  That said the logs on the upgrade?

  If he fails to step of the DB, it's usually something related to the info that is in the DB causing problems, but you must look at the newspapers.

  And FYI, migrate means you either with PCD or move to a new piece of HW, is that what you do? If this isn't the case, then you are just the upgrade.

• CUCM upgrade 9.1.2.10000 - 28 9.1.2.11900 - 12 Unrestricted access

  Hello

  I'm trying to upgrade CUCM 9.1.2.10000 - 28 cluster cluster 9.1.2.11900 - 12. I managed with 2 servers (Editor & subscribers). Let me tell you the total number of nodes in my cluster. It is a 4-node cluster, where I intend to use as a TFTP server 1 server. All others are engaged for the processing of appeals.

  2 sites. Site A and B.

  Site A has CUCM editor and the 1 subscriber who are already upgraded to the unlimited version of 9.1.2.11900 - 12.

  Site B has 2 subscribers where one of them will be used as the TFTP server and the other will be for Site A disaster recovery.

  Site A to Site B round delay is about 80ms.

  I updated to Site A CUCM servers. But it's a continuous failure to Site B.

  I downloaded the Setup log down below. Please help me to solve this problem as soon as possible.

  Thanks in advance,

  M.

  Hi MR

  In the log file you attached, I can see the following:

  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE) Fri Jun 13 14:57:37 2014 dbllib.getDataFromPub DEBUG: ontape backup [ccm9_1_2_10000_28] db file a boxed version of local [ccm9_1_2_11900_12] |
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE) Fri Jun 13 14:57:37 2014 dbllib.getDataFromPub DEBUG: * |
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE).
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE) Fri Jun 13 14:57:37 2014 dbllib.getDataFromPub DEBUG: ontape_backup from the pub is a different version of the one running on the Subscriber .
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE).
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE) Fri Jun 13 14:57:37 2014 dbllib.getDataFromPub DEBUG: reupgrade please advertising, it will regenerate the proper backup of the version of the Subscriber is to be upgraded in to |
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE).
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE) Fri Jun 13 14:57:37 2014 dbllib.getDataFromPub DEBUG: installation will fail now |
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE).
  13/06/2014-14:57:37 component_install | (CAPTURE) Fri Jun 13 14:57:37 2014 dbllib.getDataFromPub DEBUG: * |

  Check the media are the copy more properly to the Subscriber by checking the MD5 hash is correct, if they are correct, then you will need upgrade Publisher again and try the upgrade of this Subscriber.

  Kind regards

  Richard