Difference in size between wall Source and program?

Similar Questions

• The difference in performance between wins 8 and win 7.

  What performance difference is there between winning 8 and win 7, or does go through whats in win 8 which is not in win 7?

  What performance difference is there between winning 8 and win 7, or does go through whats in win 8 which is not in win 7?

  http://www.TechSpot.com/review/561-Windows8-vs-Windows7/

  http://www.TechRadar.com/us/news/software/operating-systems/Windows-8-vs-Windows-7-8-ways-its-different-1025285

  http://www.askvg.com/comparison-between-Windows-7-and-Windows-8-memory-management-system/

• Composite video is not showing is not on the Source and program monitors

  Update Premiere Pro CC 2014 to v8.1 on my Mac Pro running OS X 10.9.5

  When the conversion and loading of a project that worked very well in the last version of first Pro CC 2014, the source and program monitors refuse to display video.  Why? It's terribly frustrating!

  Information on Mac:

  Mac Pro - 2 x 2.4 Quad-Core

  24 GB RAM

  2 x ATI Radeon HD 5770

  Mark thank you for answering my question.

  I ended up having to create a new project, select the the CPU processing, the old CPU project and Recheck in my preferences to import.  Unfortunately this update cost me 2 hours of time to fix as well for me and my client. Not impressed.

• First Pro CC 20141 - end of media indicators different source and program monitors?

  Here are two dumpsters of screen showing the straight edges of the source and program monitors in 20141 PPCC. No one knows why the end of the indicators of the media are so different? Left is source monitor, the right is the program monitor.

  

  Those who are in fact different indicators. The left one is the end of the indicator of media, which lets you know that there are no more frames in the source element. The right is known as the end of the indicator of the sequence, which can also get to in the Source monitor if you play a clip at the end and then click the right arrow.

  The two indicators are controlled by the same option in the dialog box settings Overlay: indicators of the end of the Media/sequence.

• Unable to play media, source and program windows empty

  I have Adobe CS Production Premium installed 5.5 and generally operating at 100% of features on a computer Windows 7 Ultimate (64 bit) (AMD FX-8150, 16 GB of RAM, 200 + GB of free space on the disk). For the second time recently, I ran into a problem where the source and program windows/frames does not display my video clips or sequences at all; as usual I double clicked an item in my frame of window/project to modify something or open a sequence of reading, and I get nothing. (Screenshot below.) By clicking on the play button after a few minutes can lead to hearing some audio, but it does not always work, and it is very delayed, sometimes by minutes. This happens through all of my projects, so it does not appear to be linked to an individual, and it keeps restarting.

  I'm not sure what I did to heal the problem the first time around; It seemed just to get over. Nevertheless, does very difficult editing, and I'm about to start a new project...

  No idea how to solve this problem, or at least what might be at the origin of this?

  For this kind of problem, I suspect the graphics driver.

• Source and program monitors crashing in the first

  Hey all.

  So, unfortunately I seem to have problems of stability with Adobe Premiere CC 2015 (to date).

  The source files are H.264 in a .mov container.

  I am running Windows 10 but have experienced the same problem yesterday in Windows 7.

  I use the EMT.

  So here's the deal. I was running really slow and repeated performance crashing (just the program monitor and source and also of the whole program). I was pulling my hair out with frustration and decided to pull the trigger on a new computer. (Yes, I know... the upgrade to solve problems of crash was probably not the best idea, especially without the problem of the first widely).

  My old computer:

  Windows 7

  AMD Athlon II X 4 630 @ 2.8 ghz

  12 GB OF RAM

  NVIDIA GTX 460 768 GB

  New computer:

  Windows 10

  Intel i7 4790 @ 3.6 ghz

  24 GB RAM

  NVIDIA GT 720 1 GB (the OEM mobo dislikes my GTX 460 [known issue] and I plan to get a GTX 960 or GTX 970 tomorrow)

  I've been editing, completely blown away by how smooth first and After Effects were running; a pleasure to scrub through the timeline in PP and time real AE RAM previews. Then, just before you go home at night, the program and the source monitor crashed.

  On my old computer, it meant that they became black. On the new computer they're going grey (sometimes the source monitor panel displays "media forward"). On both computers, the playhead moves and audio isn't yet.

  I do not regret my upgrade, I know that it was overdue. However, it is a bit disheartening that I expected the upgrade of instability to do a thing of the past (I do not claim that it was smart thinking lol).

  Any input would be greatly appreciated.

  PS. After the program monitor and the source of watching the crash, the program does not freeze. I tried switching back and forth between Composite and Mulitcam (in the program monitor) or Composite and Audio Waveform (in the Source monitor Panel) to try to jog it in work and that does not work. On the old computer, when I was finally closed PP to relaunch a dialogue accident would seem, but not up to what I chose to close the program to reboot (little strange, right?). On the new computer, the only time where he arrived so far (less than 90 minutes to play in the first), it didn't pop up with a dialog to crash, it just closed as usual. I don't remember if the dialog crash on the old computer had an error code.

  Change the name of mov to mpeg extension and see if it will help.

  I'm not upgrading to W10 and have no problem with the nikon files and cc15. I'm a little skeptical W10.

• New user problem: Source and program monitors not identical

  Hello

  After several years of inactivity edition I want to make a new start – now with a new version of Adobe. Seems I have to do a large part of the new curve... ;-)

  Implementation of a simple test/learning project, I immediately met a strange problem:

  My Source monitor and program monitor have another 'form': the Source monitor is a block (4:3?), the program monitor is a big screen.

  I'm not aware of having modified or arranged these parameters, and I can't do them even.

  How to do this?

  The questions and related issues:

  • I looked up the initial project settings that allow me the selection of options PAL (and not NTSC), but also big screen by default (and not a different screen format). I can't find. How to do this?
  • Commenting on these parameters of the project, I'm not sure 100% what to choose if I still have the choice: I think that older movies (to change) have my trip so the most recent or 4:3 screen 16:9 wide. And after a crash of my Canon camcorder is on the way which also records (I think) on the big screen. So: Select a specific screen/project format? And WHAT should I choose?
  • The different shape of the Source and the program monitor seems to affect the use of the Titler window: also has a form 'bulk '. Thus the titles in the Titler different completely in the program monitor, especially in what concerns eligible margins. This also gives the creation of models of Titler very confusing and difficult.

  Thanks for the help!

  WimYogya

  Hi Wim,

  The Source monitor and program have qualities of different reading. For example.

  Source monitor will play the original clip. So, if you have a 4:3 video, it will play as it is.

  The program monitor will play within the parameters of the sequence you have chosen. Thus, in the case of sequence > sequence he settled on square pixel 1.0 and the clip is 4:3 it will play in a square pixel.

  Visit this link for more information: Web video wrong size / enlarged

  Vinay

• Difference in size between the 2 forms...

  Good day all.

  This may seem like a strange question, and somehow, I guess it is. But now.

  Difference in size form?

  I've drawn 2 forms that have all the same fields. The only difference between the 2 forms is 1 is English and the other is French.

  The French form is 1.4 MB and English are 2.1 MB.

  I had a quick glance and it doesn't seem to be something different between the 2 forms except as I said the language.

  The area using this form asked whether it would be possible to reduce the size of the shape as yours to send multiple copies (20 this time) and is limited to the total MB in an email.

  I use version 8.05.2073 of the life cycle of the designer

  Thank you all

  Chomp

  You can désincorporer fonts? If you do not need, also disable accessibility. Everything in file > form > Save Options.

• My Source and program monitor stopped working: Premiere Pro 2014

  Here's how it all started.

  I got an error that says I didn't have the correct video modules, then came the ugly face of BSOD. I rebooted, tried again, same result. I did a system restore with Windows, reinstalled Windows 8.1, reinstalled all my plugins and programs Adobe CC, and when I opened my project has been completely blurred. Uninstalled all Adobe software, ran CC Cleaner, reinstalled. This audio in my videos work, but now there is only a white screen on my my Source monitor and program when I try to play my calendar. I did a restore of the system under Windows, went on my site of manufacturers of laptop and updated computer to update my bios, the graphics driver and processor. Also reinstalled windows updates and my Adobe software, I tried CC Cleaner before each installation, tried to return to the previous version of first and still nothing in my source or program monitor.

  MSI GE70

  Processor Intel Core i7 4700MQ

  NVidia GeForce GTX 765M / 2GB GDDE5

  12 GB memory

  for help. Images of a Canon C100 MTS

  Premiere Pro 2014.2

  Things I've tried other threads:

  -J' read it could be a problem with the. So I also tried to start a new project with the MTS files. MOV files and h.264 and still nothing.

  -J' tried to go to the project settings and choose "make with the software", still nothing.

  -J' tried to clear the cache of the multimedia files under C: / / users / my user/app data/roaming/Adobe/common...you guessed, NOTHING.

  -J' tried to use my daughters 'Frozen' magic wand, we bought for Christmas solve the freezing problem with magic as Elsa has done in the film... surprisingly, still nothing.

  Any other ideas out there?

  Hello

  You have two graphics cards? You can check that in Device Manager > display adapters.

  If so, disable Intel Graphics and see if it helps.

  Have you tried to trash the preferences?

  Rename the 8.0 for trash folder preferences: \Users\\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Adobe Premiere Pro\

  Thank you

  Regalo

• Source and program monitor blank

  After you have installed the trial version of Premiere Pro I tried to do a quick video test using a MP4 file on my computer. I was able to successfully import this file in first but I can't see this video in the Source monitor and program monitor (after adding a sequence). I tried to re - encode files to AVI and WMV formats but neither of those two is worked. I also tried to put right in JPG and PNG images and have be in vain in the these views as well. However, I was able to export a still image using the monitors. So far, after about 3 hours of Googling the only possible answer to this question, that I could find is that first requires 2 separate drives at work; However this seems inaccurate that the program has made no attempt to warn me, or even check to see if the computer on which I use 2 disks hard during install and launch, or remember you saw in the minimum standards on the Adobe Web site. Does anyone have an idea what can really cause the problem? I'm more than happy to preview quality lower, as long as I can see what I'm doing before in a higher quality rendering.

  Need someone to help... more information please click below and provide the requested information

  -Organization of information FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/message/4200840

  What is your exact make and model graphics card (ATI or nVidia or?)

  What is your exact graphic adapter driver version?

  Did you go to the vendor's web site to search for a newer driver?

  For Windows, do NOT rely on Windows Update to have information about the current drivers

  -You must go directly to the vendor's web site and check the updates by yourself

  Autodetect Driver ATI http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/auto-detect-tool

  nVidia Driver Downloads http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us

• Difference of path between primary key and a Unique Index

  Hi all
  
  Is there a specific way the oracle optimizer to treat differently the Primary key and Unique index?
  
  Oracle Version

  SQL> select * from v$version;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
  TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  
  SQL> 

  Sample data test for Index Normal
  

  SQL> create table t_test_tab(col1 number, col2 number, col3 varchar2(12));
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> create sequence seq_t_test_tab start with 1 increment by 1 ;
  
  Sequence created.
  
  SQL>  insert into t_test_tab select seq_t_test_tab.nextval, round(dbms_random.value(1,999)) , 'B'||round(dbms_random.value(1,50))||'A' from dual connect by level < 100000;
  
  99999 rows created.
  
  SQL> commit;
  
  Commit complete.
  
  SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB',cascade => true);
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab;
  
  99999 rows selected.
  
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 1565504962
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_TEST_TAB | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
            1  recursive calls
            0  db block gets
         6915  consistent gets
          259  physical reads
            0  redo size
      1829388  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        73850  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         6668  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            0  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
        99999  rows processed
  
  SQL> create index idx_t_test_tab on t_test_tab(col1);
  
  Index created.
  
  SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB',cascade => true); 
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab;
  
  99999 rows selected.
  
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 1565504962
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_TEST_TAB | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
            1  recursive calls
            0  db block gets
         6915  consistent gets
            0  physical reads
            0  redo size
      1829388  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        73850  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         6668  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            0  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
        99999  rows processed
  
  SQL> 

  Examples of test when using primary key data
  

  SQL> create table t_test_tab1(col1 number, col2 number, col3 varchar2(12));
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> create sequence seq_t_test_tab1 start with 1 increment by 1 ;
  
  Sequence created.
  
  SQL> insert into t_test_tab1 select seq_t_test_tab1.nextval, round(dbms_random.value(1,999)) , 'B'||round(dbms_random.value(1,50))||'A' from dual connect by level < 100000;
   
  99999 rows created.
  
  SQL> commit;
  
  Commit complete.
  
  SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB1',cascade => true);
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab1;
  
  99999 rows selected.
  
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 1727568366
  
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation         | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |             | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_TEST_TAB1 | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
            1  recursive calls
            0  db block gets
         6915  consistent gets
            0  physical reads
            0  redo size
      1829388  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        73850  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         6668  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            0  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
        99999  rows processed
  
  SQL> alter table t_test_tab1 add constraint pk_t_test_tab1 primary key (col1);
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB1',cascade => true); 
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab1;
  
  99999 rows selected.
  
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 2995826579
  
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation            | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                | 99999 |   488K|    59   (2)| 00:00:01 |
  |   1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_T_TEST_TAB1 | 99999 |   488K|    59   (2)| 00:00:01 |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
            1  recursive calls
            0  db block gets
         6867  consistent gets
            0  physical reads
            0  redo size
      1829388  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        73850  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         6668  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            0  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
        99999  rows processed
  
  SQL> 

  If you see here the same even as the statistics were gathered,
  * In the 1st table T_TEST_TAB, table always use FULL table access after creating indexes.
  * And in the 2nd table T_TEST_TAB1, table uses PRIMARY KEY as expected.
  
  Any comments?
  
  Kind regards
  BPat

  >
  * In the 1st table T_TEST_TAB, table always use FULL table access after creating indexes.
  * And in the 2nd table T_TEST_TAB1, table uses PRIMARY KEY as expected.
  >
  Yes - for the first table a full table scan will be used as the currently selected column is nullable and indexes do not include null values.

  The index can be used for the second query, since all the data (first column) is available between the index and there may be no NULL values because of the primary key. If you check constraints, you find that the there is now a CHECK constraint to ensure that the first column cannot be null.

  For a full and interesting discussion see the explanation of this and a related issue on the question I ask in this thread
  What SYS tables (not seen) contain the value NULL spec /not/ column definition? and my response he posted: 23 April 2012 09:02

  I ask the question is based on a question here which is similar to yours
  Columns becoming nullable after a fall of primary key?

• using the iMac 5 K and BM IO - source monitor changing 25 p 50 p causing black between the source and the program 4 s

  Reading in the source organization IMac 5 K using Blackmagic IO outputs 25 p 50 p monitor

  The effect is black as monitor re sync when I switch between 25 p 4 seconds the program monitor and hardware 25 p in the source monitor. Occurs on iMac 5K not MacBookPro.

  This happens with:

  Images 25 p in F5 Sony MXF DALYS and

  25 p DALY mxf op1a export agency

  Reading in the Source monitor is reported as 50 p BM Office video and monitor.

  A sequence created by dragging clips to create (so matching 25 p DALYS) reports it as 25PsF in BM (and so in 50i by monitor)

  Change the interpretation of the attached to the interlaced 30 frame can result in 60i and then adjusting to 25 fps may result in 50i, but this appears inconsistent.

  It's on an IMac 5 K use pilot 10.6.4 with El Capitan to CC2015.2 and day to day.

  This problem occurs both Ultrastudio 4 K and MiniMonitor (the reduced MiniMonitor the 50 p to 720/25 p

  The problem ONLY is NO PRODUCT with the same project/media/drivers/software/e/s on a MacBookPro.

  I don't know if it means a bug in the driver of the ORGANIZATION or the World Bank.

  Thanks for any help or the confirmation or not of this problem on a similar facility

  OK - after that the support of a lot of help from the world BANK has been fixed by trashing preferences (I used preference - Digital Rebellion Manager))

• Different size of the image in the Source and program areas

  Hello. This that is set to see the same in the Source mailboxes and the program? Picture of program box is magnified, so the Source image is missing.

  I have the setting on the widescreen 16:9 NTSC report. The two areas are defined on FIT. Thanks a lot version CS5. Janice

  Your sequence setting does not match your film "size".

  You probably need a HD sequence

• Difference in size between Dreamweaver, see in Safari and the friend's PC

  In Dreamweaver CS3, I have a table with two cells containing the type. In order to get the type to not appear too big, I need size to 6 pt type size on screen in Dreamweaver, it appears like all text size normal 10pt in my browser Safari on a Mac and then it seems too small, but readable, and greater than what I see in Dreamweaver on PC of a friend by AOL. This mystifies me as it happens only on this page. When I go out the existing text to normal size in the table cell, it becomes too large as seen in the Safari browser, so what I'm doing is sizing up 40% (tiny) in dreamweaver so it will come back in the browser as normal paragraph text size.

  Never had this happen before. Any ideas?

  TIA,

  Ken

  No idea without seeing the page.

  However, I would suggest that you avoid using the pt (a metric impression) for the sizing of fonts on web pages.

  Instead, use px or em.

• Great color and differences of tone between DW CS3 and PS CS3

  I am running PS CS3 and DW, on a MacBook Pro connected to a second screen.  I calibrated and profiled two screens on the same graphics card using i1, and all shots are using an sRGB profile.  Looking at browsers beside there are differences in color, Safari is way out there.  What is strange, is that there is a big difference between DW and PS, I would say that two program windows are side by side on the same screen, with the same time.  DW shows the web page that publishes the blow, and PS has the same open photo, (she has been optimized during recording) socket in the pictures of my local site folder.  Any ideas?

  Thank you

  Chris

  Hello

  You can check that your PS program does not use the setting of sRGB, adobe, but in general there is no real solution to the problem. Especially if you're designing for the web, (how many users never calibrate their monitor, except by the eyes?) as for the difference in the programs, you can calibrate your graphics programs to use a specific setting / profile of color, but as dreamweaver is not a graphics program, it will use the settings of your system.

  The reason why I mentioned my previous answers was to point out that nobody has solved this satisfactory problem to my knowledge, see - http://forums.adobe.com/search.jspa?resultTypes=DOCUMENT&resultTypes=MESSAGE&resultTypes=C COMMUNITY & resultTypes = TASK & resultTypes = PROJECT & resultTypes = SOCIAL_GROUP & resultTypes = COMMENT & peopleEnabled = true & q = color + problems.

  What about Safari, if you think that the problem with color is a problem, try the problems with type- http://www.antigrain.com/research/font_rasterization/index.html.

  PZ