Different behaviors in different accommodation

Similar Questions

• We can use a different accommodation than Adobe?

  Some time ago, I read somewhere, we can use another server hosting to distribuite rights with enterprise edition, but on my recent research, as I can't find anything considered that. I have a bad memory?
  Simple-we looking for a cheap solution to distribute single items as a single folios in our future application, rather a single question. This can multiply x 25 for us the cost if we have to pay for each unique download instead for the GB of traffic.

  Or Adobe may provide, like many other competitors, also a GB of traffic?

  All the items/forms should be hosted by Adobe at the use of DPS. There is no alternative to the hosting option, and prices are per download of folio, not per GB.

  Neil

• "FTP only is not supported on this server" error message

  Hey, I just finished a web design using Muse, but when I just downloaded on my third host im getting this message:

  «FTP is not supported on this server [could not connect to port 21 rootingandfruiting.co.uk: Connection refused].»

  Does anyone know why this might be? Does this mean that Muse cannot download to this particular customer of accommodation?

  I downloaded another site through Muse by using a client of different accommodation and it worked fine. So I was wondering if this message means that there is a problem with my hosting customer, or if the problem is just that Muse does not support the host client im trying to use.

  The hosting customer is serfdom if that helps.

  Hope someone can help me.

  Thank you

  My guess is that the URL of the ftp server is incorrect. Some hosts use a different URL for the FTP web site (ftp.mysite.com to ifrance.com, for example).

• FF13 different behavior on the two machines home page

  FF gives different results than "Home Page" on both machines.

  On the desktop, I get my set (the former google/firefox one) homepage.

  On laptop, I have two tabs, the first of about: at home, the second is my fixed home page (the same old google/firefox one).

  On the desktop when I press home, page becomes whole-home page.

  On laptop when I press home, new tab is launched to give me my whole-home page.

  The behavior on the desktop is what I expect and what I want. Which continues with Notepad and how do I do the same thing as the Office?

  Check your settings on the laptop home page, you have inadvertently defined two pages as your home page...

  See - How to set the home page

• Different behaviors in MAX vs LabVIEW when writing the attribute IMAQdx GigE

  Hi, I'm controlling a Dalsa GigE camera in LabVIEW RT using IMAQdx.  Apart from a few quirks with interface we are image acquisition without a lot of problems at the moment.

  However, there are one or two issues that are confusing.  In this case, it is possible to set a MAX attribute (an attribute of command that tells the device to perform the internal calibration), but when you set the attribute in LabVIEW, the error 0xBFF69010 (-1074360304) unable to create the attribute is thrown.  See the attached images.

  I check if the attribute is writable before making an entry.  It is, however, the write failed, and read the iswritable attribute and then returns false.  In MAX, I can write to this attribute with no problems.

  I have to set up/read/write in my LabVIEW code that makes MAX.  MAX writes all the attributes (based on the values in the XML file) when he opens the camera or he reads simply all the values of the camera.  When LabVIEW opens a reference camera does perform the same steps that what MAX - I'm trying to figure out what could be the difference between MAX and LabVIEW, which might be the cause of this behavior.

  Any help will be appreciated.

  AnthonV wrote:

  Hi, I'm controlling a Dalsa GigE camera in LabVIEW RT using IMAQdx.  Apart from a few quirks with interface we are image acquisition without a lot of problems at the moment.

  However, there are one or two issues that are confusing.  In this case, it is possible to set a MAX attribute (an attribute of command that tells the device to perform the internal calibration), but when you set the attribute in LabVIEW, the error 0xBFF69010 (-1074360304) unable to create the attribute is thrown.  See the attached images.

  I check if the attribute is writable before making an entry.  It is, however, the write failed, and read the iswritable attribute and then returns false.  In MAX, I can write to this attribute with no problems.

  I have to set up/read/write in my LabVIEW code that makes MAX.  MAX writes all the attributes (based on the values in the XML file) when he opens the camera or he reads simply all the values of the camera.  When LabVIEW opens a reference camera does perform the same steps that what MAX - I'm trying to figure out what could be the difference between MAX and LabVIEW, which might be the cause of this behavior.

  Any help will be appreciated.

  Hi AnthonV,

  "Weird" is a good way to describe the Spyder3 when it comes to the GigE Vision/GenICam interface (as opposed to the Dalsa driver that communicates using custom commands via ethernet camera series)...

  The Spyder3 has many questions focused on the calendar. It is possible that the time between the opening of the camera and the setting of this function is different by MAX vs your code in LabVIEW. In addition, there are some cases where MAX will be deletes the error to display. Ignoring the error indicated vs you see the feature to take effect in both cases?

  The base between MAX and LabVIEW behavior is the same. In both cases when you open the unit all parameters are responsible for our camera file that has the registered device settings. This file is created the first time that you open the unit and are updated every time you click on save to MAX or call an API function to save the settings. In any case, I know that the Spyder3 has various questions backup/restore the settings of our camera files.

  I suggest talking with Dalsa on the issues you are experiencing. They might be able to put up with a newer firmware that addresses some of these issues (we have worked with them in the past to identify several of them).

  Eric

• Different behavior between cRIO 'Run as Startup' and debugging run

  Hello

  I have an application that does a lot of things, including playing a card NI 9213 Thermocouple, which lies on a connected to a RT cRIO target expansion chassis. The application is run on the target of RT. My problem is related to a behavioral difference between opening a connection to the channels of thermocouple in debug (by clicking on the arrow on the VI run) mode and the opening of the connection through a Build specification (by clicking Run as to start).

  During execution, the VI wrote in a text file on the hard drive of the cRIO. I enclose the text files, one of the debug mode and a Run as startup mode. I have only two thermocouples connected (ch1 and ch15). From the text file, you can see the connection opens without error in debug mode, but get an error in startup mode. I've also attached an extract showing the VI that I used for the test.

  A few notes:

  Nothing to do with the VI is changed between each type of race.

  The Build specification has the attached VI selected as startup VI, everything else is default

  Someone else out there has had a problem similar to this? I feel like the debug mode should act identically to the normal start deployment. Otherwise, what's the point?

  Thank you

  I solved the problem! Or at least worked around it by setting a different bug. This another bug happened to be the same words that were this bug, to run as a startup. I'll summarize for you:

• The button behavior is different between Windows 8 and Windows 7

  Hello

  I'm developing an application that runs on Windows 7 and Windows 8. This application is intended to be used with a touch screen. Users must make choice of a ListView.

  With Windows 7, everything works fine. Items are selected when the user clicks on it.

  Things are different on Windows 8. If the user do not type in the center of the item (IE, if the finger touches simultaneously two elements), Windows seems to think that the selection is ambiguous and does not select anything. This is particularly problematic when the list contains small pieces of interface user, in which case the user must be very specific by touching the screen.
   
  Is it possible to disable this behavior, or reduce the radius of ambiguity?

  Thank you

  Simon (sausage fingers).

  I'm developing an application that runs on Windows 7 and Windows 8. This application is intended to be used with a touch screen. Users must make choice of a ListView.

  With Windows 7, everything works fine. Items are selected when the user clicks on it.

  Things are different on Windows 8. If the user do not type in the center of the item (IE, if the finger touches simultaneously two elements), Windows seems to think that the selection is ambiguous and does not select anything. This is particularly problematic when the list contains small pieces of interface user, in which case the user must be very specific by touching the screen.
   
  Is it possible to disable this behavior, or reduce the radius of ambiguity?

  Probably a better question for TECHNET as consumer forums.
   
  Numbers of rolliche good luck!

• Different drag / drop behavior of the mouse on different users on the same virtual machine Windows 10 Pro accounts

  I just upgraded to 8.1 on Mac OS X 10.11.3 Fusion "El Capitan" on a new iMac 27-inch 5K retina. The guest operating system is a new virtual machine Windows 10 Pro. I have two user accounts on the virtual machine, my local administrator account and another account local standard user. When I am logged into my account, I am able to drag and drop files to and from the guest to the normally Mac OS. As the mouse moves freely between the guest OS and the Mac. However, when I connect using the standard other account, I can't drag - move to and from the guest for the Mac OS. Also once I click into the virtual machine the mouse movement is limited to the virtual machine until I have press the buttons on the Mac to free the movement of the mouse to the Mac. I tried to uninstall and reinstall the vmware tools but the same behavior persists. Any ideas on a solution and why these two users accounts would act differently?

  Just phone with the help of VMware. They solved the problem in uninstalling and reinstalling VMware tools and change the following VMware Fusion preferences-> preferences-> General-> Gaming: to 'Never mouse optimize for games '. It has been set to 'always optimize the mouse for games '.  After that drag & drop, mouse movement works smoothly and perfectly now. Thank you VMware support!

• Different behavior on the eyes; layer names are correct?

  Different behavior on the eyes; scales up and down, left right behaves as expected. All layer names are correct in artificial intelligence. Where to find a solution?

  Hmm, the sent JPG seems to be broken.

  But here's a place to look: in the Panel of the puppet, with no layers selected, you should see the behavior of face in the properties panel. Twirl in the group "Handles" to see what parts of the face it found. It shows the layers that you expect to find? (ToolTips will tell you what he's looking for.) Twirl down replacements also to see the layers of flashing. Note that if it does not find a layer of Blink for a certain look, it dimensionnera the eye that you close the eye rather than go to the work of replacement blink.

• Background layer unlocks and becomes the normal "no flat" layer after using the crop tool in PS CC 2015.1 (a different behavior for older versions of PS)

  Hi all

  I found that it is more difficult to explain than I thought

  I don't like the new behavior in the latest version of Photoshop (CC 2015.1) regarding the way in which the background layers automatically unlock and convert to regular layers after using the crop tool. It's completely different to how things worked in previous versions, where a background layer remained in locked state flattened after using the crop tool.

  I get a LOT of images and this change has added an extra step to each image that I harvest, because I flatten the layers after cropping before saving the image. I looked through the preferences but cannot find a way to change this new behavior. Am I missing something?

  Thanks in advance for your help

  See if checking Delete the cropped Pixels in the tool options makes a difference.

  

• Network of ESXi - different behavior when installing adapter

  Hi Experts,

  I came across a strange problem on the network adapters section:

  • I was installing the ESXi 5.5 in a standalone Machine (re-usable)
  • When installing, it showed me the error on non detected network cards and I checked the compatibility of the guide and found that it was not a supported network card.
  • Then I installed 'VMware Workstation 10' on the same machine on the host operating system
  • I have created a virtual machine and tried to install 'ESXi' inside the virtual machine [just for curiosity\
  • He installed perfactly without error / warning (s).

  My concern is 'how and why ESXi comes with two different behaviors between installation Metel naked Machine v/s install inside a virtual machine on the same physical host.

  Thanks for your response in advance and I apologize if I am not able to present the screenplay with clarity.

  -Kuldeep Singh

  Under vmware workstation, the virtualized esxi uses the virtual NIC (probably E1000) driver, which is supported.  The host operating system uses its own realtek driver.

  When you try to run ESXi on bare metal, it doesn't have a realtek driver, if it fails.

  It is a driver problem.

• Trigger of the ISO (behavior?) behavior different in 11g (works of 10g, 11g not)

  We have a two master tables, A and B connected by an xref, AB, who has the key to A column and the column key of B... each help-offer combo can only happen once.
  
  A may have 0 to many Bs, B can be 0 to many as.
  
  (these tables describe a pool of 'work'... the work can start at different points... If there is flow and life is good, it starts with A, becomes B and so a bond between them, but sometimes has never progresses to B... sometimes there are emergencies, and so B is created... each pool has a Master ID to itself)
  
  We have a view V1...
  Outer join B AB where corresponds to the button B (one column).
  
  ... we want to see Group B, if there a records, and as that may be related.
  
  We have another opinion V2... that selects in V1 where A key is not null.
  (we're too lazy to get another opinion that represents a join B - AB).
  
  We have a trigger to ISO on V2 (V2 is used by a form, but the problem is the DB level).
  
  In SQL Developer... in DB10g, V2 shows insertable ACE / ID.
  (the trigger handles all things, gets the data in the table AB, which is what cares the view).
  
  In SQL Developer... in DB11g, V2 DOES NOT SHOW UP insertable / suppressible.
  
  The same code in both places. We test 11g, in order to determine our "traps" before that we will occupy migrate.
  
  With the 10gDB behind the form, follows after a deletion.
  With the 11gDB behind the form, it gives a 'impossible to remove from the view' and begins to talk about keys preserved and row ID.
  
  Why?
  
  We know that the data is very good. We like the behavior of 10g.
  The V1 and V2 have good recordset and keys appropriate to AB, and B.
  
  Without re - write this and similarly built views, what do we do to make it work again?
  
  All the clues are welcome!
  
  SM

  SM_Work wrote:
  With the 11gDB behind the form, it gives a 'impossible to remove from the view' and begins to talk about keys preserved and row ID.

  Only one question here is you ;)

  And the facts of talking too much, too little hard.

  What is you get the exact error message?
  What do you do with her?
  ANSI joins is involved?
  Can error be reproduced using SQL * more?
  Looking for metalink? -A first guess could be Bug 14274321

  Could you post the view? -If possible, a version boiled down from it.

  Think I remember a similar discussion (without knowing what we are actually discussing)-finding something like 10g was too lenient and he failed, now 11g.

  Concerning
  Peter

• Debugger of different behavior / response SOAP

  Hi all
  
  I have a question about a difference between the behavior of the debugger and the SOAP response, using the same entry/call data. I'll explain below:
  
  It's my data entry
  < feature id = "global" complete = "false" >
  < instance id = "global 1" >
  < feature id = full "depersoon" = "true" >
  < instance id = "depersoon 1" >
  < attribute id = "persoon_rol" type = "text" deducted = "false" >
  Type < text-val > < / text-val >
  < / attribute >
  < attribute id = "persoon_geboortedatum" type = "date".
  inferred = "false" >
  < date-val > 1998-03-04 < / date-val >
  < / attribute >
  < / body >
  < instance id = "depersoon 2" >
  < attribute id = "persoon_rol" type = "text" deducted = "false" >
  aanvrager < text-val > AKW < / text-val >
  < / attribute >
  < / body >
  < / entity >
  < / body >
  < / entity >
  
  
  It's my SOAP request
  < soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv = 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' xmlns:typ = "http://oracle.com/determinations/server/10.3/rulebase/assess/types" >
  < soapenv:Body >
  < type: evaluate request >
  < typ:outcome >
  < typ:entity id 'global' = >
  < typ:attribute - id of result = result "doel_datacollectie" style = "decision-report" / >
  < / typ:entity >
  < / typ:outcome >
  < / typ:config >
  < type: global instance >
  < feature id = full "depersoon" = "true" >
  < instance id = "depersoon 1" >
  < attribute id = "persoon_rol" type = "text" deducted = "false" >
  Type < text-val > < / text-val >
  < / attribute >
  < attribute id = "persoon_geboortedatum" type = "date" deducted = "false" >
  < date-val > 1998-03-04 < / date-val >
  < / attribute >
  < / body >
  < instance id = "depersoon 2" >
  < attribute id = "persoon_rol" type = "text" deducted = "false" >
  aanvrager < text-val > AKW < / text-val >
  < / attribute >
  < / body >
  < / entity >
  < / typ: global instance >
  < / typ: evaluate request >
  < / soapenv:Body >
  < / soapenv:Envelope >
  The OPM debugger
  
  Now, I did some rules of procedure in order to deduce the data necessary for a deduction. The main rule is to state that all of the data is completed, if some secondary data sets are known. Now, if the child (het kind) is less than 16 years, I want to ask a different subset that wehen the child is 16 or more. I did it by using the following rule: (read 'and' to 'fr' and 'or' to 'from'):
  
  verplichte dataset voor het bepalen van recht op kinderbijslag is handig als
  DataSet voor request is handig
  en
  DataSet voor aanvrager is handig
  en
  een van
  Alle
  DataSet voor kind onder 16 is handig
  en
  ForAll (het kind, of York van het kind < 16)
  of
  Alle
  DataSet voor kind boven 16 is handig
  en
  ForAll (het kind, of York van het kind > = 16)
  
  In the debugger, when I put the age of the child 13 and choose "study," the decision tree for the data set for the children over 16 years of age is not displayed. However, in the SOAP response, this information is indicated (see curisive below). I would like to know if and how it would be possible to organize the report of decision not to show these attributes.
  
  
  SOAP response
  < SOAP - ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP - ENV = "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:i18n = "http://www.w3.org/2005/09/ws-i18n" xmlns:typ = "http://oracle.com/determinations/server/10.3/rulebase/assess/types" >
  < SOAP - ENV:Header >
  < i18n:international >
  nl_NL < i18n: local > < / i18n: local >
  < i18n:tz > GMT + 0100 < / i18n:tz >
  < / i18n:international >
  < / SOAP - ENV:Header >
  < SOAP - ENV:Body >
  < type: assessment / response >
  < type: global instance >
  < typ:attribute id = "doel_datacollectie" type = "boolean" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < typ:decision - report-style = 'decision-report' report >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:0". "= the instance id 'global' = 'global' hypothetical instance ="false"attribute id ="doel_datacollectie"type ="boolean"text ="dataset het bepalen van recht op kinderbijslag handig voor verplichte is?"deducted ="false">
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < typ:relationship - node id = "dn:16" id-entity-source = 'global' source-instance-id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" target-entity-id = "depersoon" - relationship id = "hetkind" status "known" = deducted = "true" >
  < instance id = typ:target "depersoon 1" / >
  < typ:relationship - node id = "dn:8" id-entity-source = 'global' source-instance-id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" target-entity-id = "depersoon" - relationship id = "depersonen" State = "known" deducted = "false" >
  < instance id = typ:target "depersoon 1" / >
  < instance id = typ:target "depersoon 2" / >
  < / typ:relationship - node >
  < / typ:relationship - node >
  < typ:attribute - id = the id of the entity node-"dn:1" = id of the 'global' instance 'global' = hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "b2@Rules_Datacollectieregels_doc" type = "boolean" text = "Is to request handig voor dataset?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-'dn:2' = 'global' instance id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "aanvraag_handtekening" type = "boolean" text = "Bevat een special request?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-'dn:3' = 'global' instance id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "aanvraag_bewijsdoc_aanwezig" type = "boolean" text = "Bewijsdocumenten request was van Zijn?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-'dn:4' = 'global' instance id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "aanvraag_formulier_volledig" type = "boolean" text = 'Is form request capture ingevuld van het?' deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-'dn:5' = 'global' instance id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "aanvraag_type" type = "text" text = "Het type request is onbekend" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - id = the id of the entity node-"dn:6" = id of the 'global' instance 'global' = hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "b3@Rules_Datacollectieregels_doc" type = "boolean" text = "Dataset aanvrager handig voor is?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < typ:relationship - node id = "dn:7" id-entity-source = 'global' source-instance-id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" target-entity-id = "depersoon" - relationship id = "deaanvragerakw" status "known" = deducted = "true" >
  < instance id = typ:target "depersoon 2" / >
  < type: already proven node id = "dn:8" / >
  < / typ:relationship - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:9" = id of the instance-'depersoon' = ' depersoon 1 ' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "persoon_kring_verzekerden" type = "boolean" text = "Behoort persoon tot for kring der verzekerd?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:10" = id of the instance-'depersoon' = ' depersoon 2 ' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "persoon_kring_verzekerden" type = "boolean" text = "Behoort persoon tot for kring der verzekerd?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:11" = "depersoon" - instance id = "depersoon 1" hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "persoon_woonland" type = "text" text = "Het woonland van persoon is onbekend" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:12" = id of the instance-'depersoon' = ' depersoon 2 ' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "persoon_woonland" type = "text" = "Het woonland van persoon is onbekend" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:13" = id of the instance-'depersoon' = ' depersoon 1 ' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "persoon_export_mogelijk" type = "boolean" text = "persoon aan om het recht op kinderbijslag conditions good you i.e.?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:14" = id of the instance-'depersoon' = ' depersoon 2 ' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "persoon_export_mogelijk" type = "boolean" text = "persoon aan om het recht op kinderbijslag conditions good you i.e.?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - id = the id of the entity node-'dn:15' = 'global' = 'global' instance id hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "b4@Rules_Datacollectieregels_doc" type = "boolean" text = "Is kind onder 16 handig voor DataSet?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < type: already proven node id = "dn:16" / >
  < type: already proven node id = "dn:11" / >
  < type: already proven node id = "dn:12" / >
  < typ:attribute - node id = entity 'dn:17' id = 'depersoon' - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 1" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_geboortedatum" type = "date" text = "geboortedatum van persoon is 03/04/98. ' deducted ="false">"
  < typ:date - val > 1998 - 03 - 04 < / typ:date - val >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = entity 'dn:18' id = 'depersoon' - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 2" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_geboortedatum" type = "date" text = "Geboortedatum van persoon is onbekend" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-'dn:19' = instance id 'global' = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "kind_hh_aanvrager" type = "boolean" text = "Woont het kind in het huishouden van aanvrager?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:20" = "depersoon" - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 1" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_kind_AKW" type = "boolean" text = "" kind een persoon is in Zin van AKW? "deducted ="false">"
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:21" = "depersoon" - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 2" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_kind_AKW" type = "boolean" text = "" kind een persoon is in Zin van AKW? "deducted ="false">"
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = "dn:22" entity-id = "depersoon" - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 1" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_recht_stufi" type = "boolean" text = "Persoon recht op studiefinanciering has?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - node id = "dn:23" entity-id = "depersoon" - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 2" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_recht_stufi" type = "boolean" text = "Persoon recht op studiefinanciering has?" deducted = "false" >
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < typ:attribute - id = the id of the entity node-'dn:24' = 'global' = 'global' instance id deducted hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "kind_leeftijd" type = "number" text = "Travel van het kind is 13." = "true" >
  < typ:number - val > 13.0 < / typ:number - val >
  < type: already proven node id = "dn:16" / >
  < type: already proven node id = "dn:17" / >
  < type: already proven node id = "dn:18" / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  + < typ:attribute - id = the id of the entity node-'dn:25' = 'global' = 'global' instance id hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "b5@Rules_Datacollectieregels_doc" type = "boolean" text = 'Is friendly boven 16 handig voor DataSet?' deducted 'false' = > +.
  + < typ:unknown - val / > +.
  + < type: already proven node id = "dn:16" / >.
  + < type: already proven node id = "dn:15" / >.
  + < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-'dn:26' = instance id 'global' = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "kind_boven_inkomensgrens" type = "boolean" text = "Verdient het kind meer inkomensgrens voor kinderen dan?" deducted = "false" > +.
  + < typ:unknown - val / > +.
  + < / typ:attribute - node > +.
  + < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:27" = "depersoon" - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 1" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_tijdsbesteding" type = "text" text = "Tijdsbesteding van persoon is onbekend" deducted = "false" > +.
  + < typ:unknown - val / > +.
  + < / typ:attribute - node > +.
  + < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-"dn:28" = "depersoon" - instance id = hypothetical instance "depersoon 2" = "false" attribute id = "persoon_tijdsbesteding" type = "text" text = "Tijdsbesteding van persoon is onbekend" deducted = "false" > +.
  + < typ:unknown - val / > +.
  + < / typ:attribute - node > +.
  + < typ:attribute - node id = id of the entity-'dn:29' = 'global' instance id = 'global' hypothetical instance = "false" attribute id = "aanvrager_onderh_bijdrage" type = "boolean" text = "Aanvrager aan of onderhoudsbijdrage voor het kind good?" deducted = "false" > +.
  < typ:unknown - val / >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < / typ:attribute - node >
  < / typ:decision - report >
  < / typ:attribute >
  < typ:entity id = "depersoon" >
  < typ:instance id = '1 depersoon' >
  < typ:attribute id = "persoon_rol" type = "text" >
  < typ:text - val > type < / typ:text - val >
  < / typ:attribute >
  < typ:attribute id = "persoon_geboortedatum" type = "date" >
  < typ:date - val > 1998 - 03 - 04 < / typ:date - val >
  < / typ:attribute >
  < / typ:instance >
  < typ:instance id = "depersoon 2" >
  < typ:attribute id = "persoon_rol" type = "text" >
  < typ:text - val > aanvrager AKW < / typ:text - val >
  < / typ:attribute >
  < / typ:instance >
  < / typ:entity >
  < / typ: global instance >
  < / typ: assess / answer >
  < / SOAP - ENV:Body >
  < / SOAP - ENV:Envelope >
  
  Any help?
  
  Cheers, Els

  Why this happens is to do with a quirk in the analysis of the server request determinations in that once a goal of attribute is unknown, what is returned only the most relevant way. This has to do with the former definition of the relevance engine, which means that the server of determinations had to ask all the unknown paths for an unknown purpose, otherwise you couldn't retrieve enough information to complete the investigation and this somewhat strange behavior was maintained for backwards compatibility reasons since.

  Given that the current definition of the beneficiaries of relevance that will answer you always enough information to fill an unknown goal, we decided to change the service behavior assess in the next version so now the server of determinations and the time debugger will display the same in this situation.

• The unwanted behavior of pure Android... different in Flex and ActionScript selection... Why?

  Hello

  I'm doing the light text selection behavior on my Xoom Android in different circumstances:

  1. in a pure ActionScript mobile app, selection and copy / paste is controlled by a control floating appearing on the screen without resize or move or nothing

  2. in a mobile Flex application, selection, and copy / paste is controlled by a bar of the user interface that appears at the top of the screen, pushing the entire down application, loses focus on my textfield, ballsing upward every bit of control I have further confused the hell out of my user whose finger is therefore more pointed at the piece of text , they wanted to select but rather something that is about a half inch above this point...

  Then...

  Of course, I want to get to 1. for Flex - for example: I want to allow the selection and copy / paste without loss of activity, without repositioning and confuse the hell out of my user.

  Does anyone have a clues how I can achieve this?

  Thank you

  G

  I have it. Two selection behaviors depend on the underlying skin.

  It works with Flex:

  skinClass

  : ClassReference ("spark.skins.mobile.TextInputSkin"

  );

  Where it shifts the application down, set a bar above and usually live with any interactivity that you would want to do with your selected text...

  skinClass: ClassReference ("spark.skins.mobile.StageTextAreaSkin"

  );

  G

• Folder Panel behavior is different in LR3 library

  I installed LR3 a couple of days and just noticed a behavior that is different from LR2 in the folders Panel. The view of folder and subfolder is static when LR3 opens. In other words, if I minimize a set of subfolders, close the application and open it again, the subfolders appear expanded. Some do and others don't. It's as if LR3 took a picture of the 'State' of the files Panel in LR2 when it imported the catalog and now he always comes to the top in the same way. LR2 remember the last State of the files Panel when open - LR3 does not work!  I don't like this. I have a LOT of folders/subfolders! I don't want to see some of them always open! There is a new preference that I don't know?

  Jose

  This is a bug.  Make sure that all subfolders are closed if you want the parent folder to close the launch.  To do this, the easiest method is to alt-click on a folder that opens or closes and all of its subfolders.

  I have all them close before I go out and this does not happen to me.