Digital overflow in proc error

Similar Questions

• Issue of digital overflow

  Hello

  Can someone well want to explain to me why I am getting this error -

  {

  DECLARE

  P1 PLS_INTEGER: = 2147483647;

  P2 PLS_INTEGER: = 1;

  n NUMBER.

  BEGIN

  n: = p1 + p2;

  END;

  /

  }

  Error-

  ORA-01426: digital overflow

  ORA-06512: at line 6

  Thank you 1 million.

  Hello

  Sri G wrote:

  Hello

  Can someone well want to explain to me why I am getting this error -

  {

  DECLARE

  P1 PLS_INTEGER: = 2147483647;

  P2 PLS_INTEGER: = 1;

  n NUMBER.

  BEGIN

  n: = p1 + p2;

  END;

  /

  }

  Error-

  ORA-01426: digital overflow

  ORA-06512: at line 6

  Thank you 1 million.

  When you add the PLS_INTEGERs 2, the result is a PLS_INTEGER.  The amount you're trying to do is greater than the maximum value that can contain a PLS_INTEGER, that's why you get the error.

  If you change the assignment statement to

  n: = CAST (p1 AS NUMBER) + p2;

  you will not get this error.

  If you suspect that you will get anywhere near the limit, you should not use PLS_INTEGERs.

• Compatibility of proc error

  I currently have a desktop computer HP P6404y with a Phenom II X 4 820 running Windows 7 64 bit Edition home premium.

  My system was either not boot the operating system when I try and run a game or sit on it too long and have several things open the system will crash. I ran a diagnostic on the system and the hardware/software is says Core 2-3-4 of my proc lost symmetry, which explains why it stops randomly.

  I checked the specifications of the motherboard (M2N78 - THE Violet6) and it has a socket AM3 and is supported by the Phenom II X 4 9XX series processor. I bought a Phenom II X 4 965, which is a compatible AM3 processor, but when I put it in I immediately get an error saying the processor is not compatible. I called AMD and they confirmed that it should work, but there is a certain type of thing with the BIOS that allows to not work and they thought that HP had a fix. I couldn't find something that helps me this online and I have upgraded the BIOS to 5.16, but I did Exchange yet because I don't see anything in the update that said fixed compatibility.

  I called HP and they said apparently they have fertile procs that you can get through them, which makes no sense to me, but if it's true it's true I guess that.

  Is it possible that I can get the proc that I have to work with this computer? Thanks in advance.

  Here are the specifications of your HP Pavilion p6404y desktop computer and its card mother M2N78-(Violet6). According to the specifications, the following processors are supported;

  This motherboard supports only the AM3 processors

  AMD Phenom II X 4 9xx/9xxe/8xx Quad-Core (Deneb)

  AMD Phenom II X 3 Triple-Core (Heka) 7xx/7xxe

  AMD Phenom II X 2 5xx (Callisto)

  AMD Athlon II X 4 6xx/6xxe (undactylopodite)

  AMD Athlon II X 3 4xx/4xxe (Rana)

  AMD Athlon II X 2 2xx/2xxe (Regor)

  At the same time, I think the specs, said a maximum TDP of 95 watts but I could be wrong. In this case the maximum TDP would probably 125 watts. Based on the site Web of AMD, there are only two AMD Phenom II X 4 965 CPU. One is rated at 125 watts and the other is 140 Watts. Both are 'Black Edition' CPU, which means they have an unlocked clock multiplier and are designed to be overclocked. Very little HP computers have options overclocking and yours is not one of them.

  The AMD Phenom II X 4 965 CPU is probably incompatible with your computer p6404y HP because of that;

  (a) it exceeds the maximum. PDT to the motherboard

  and / or

  (b) there is a "Black Edition" CPU

  Please consider buying one of these 95 watt AMD Phenom II X 4 processors compatibility assured.

  Please send Bravo

• Western Digital drive external hard error 0x8007045D

  I have a Western Digital 1 TB external hard drive, and I am currently running Windows 7.  When I try to move files on the hard drive I get the error 0x8007045D i/o and it won't let me move or copy the file.  What can I do to fix this?

  For any question on Windows 7:

  http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/Windows7

  Link above is Windows 7 Forum for questions on Windows 7.

  Windows 7 questions should be directed to / stationed there.

  You are in the Vista Forums.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Digital Audio Room Correction error: failed to get delay measures

  Original title: Digital Audio Room Correction

  Hello

  I have my system setup to be able to video chat, and there's a really bad echo across the line.  When people speak to me in my configuration, they can clearly hear what they were saying is repeated.  I did some tests and it seems that the issue is due to the sound from the speakers bouncing off the walls and then picked up by the mic.  I found this room correction function in the sound options menu and finds it difficult to make it work.
  Under the terms of his, I click on properties of speaker.  The enhancements tab I find the room correction.  I run the test and it begins to make the beeps sounds.  Then it gives me an error saying it is "impossible to obtain measurements of delay.
  I think the correction of delay could solve my problem of echo.
  Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.
  Thank you
  Nick

  Hello

  What is the brand and model of the sound card?

  The room correction function is provided by the audio driver manufacturing and rests not natively in the operating system. I suggest you to update the sound card drivers and check the status. If the update of drivers does not have the problem, you can try to uninstall and reinstall the drivers from Device Manager sound card, follow these steps:

  (a) start Control Panel, click hardware and sound and then click Device Manager.

  (b) to expand the node that represents the type of device you want to uninstall, right click on the entrance to the unit and click on uninstall.

  (c) in the dialog box confirm the device removal, click OK to start the uninstall process.

  (d) when the uninstall is complete, the site of the factory driver download and install the drivers.

  (e) after installing the drivers, install the latest updates.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work correctly

• Digital overflow in the model of device in Multisim 13

  I try to get the frequency response from 1 to 20000 Hz to Probe1 one I have this error occurs, please help.

  

  Hello

  I checked your circuit, there are two things need to be changed.
  

  First of all, you connected the 9V negative VS positive + your op - am which can burn unit in real life.

  Second, for your output terminal, you crashed the probe1 directly, which means that there will be no signal output at all. You can add a junction (ctrl + J) next to your R5 and remove the wire to ground to fix it.

  1 to 20 kHz frequency response is shown below.

  

  The fixed circuit is attached.

  Kind regards

• Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS digital camera 10MP - Communication error

  Recently the camera communicates more with one of my computers (one is 32-bit, the other is 64-bit).  When I connect the camera, it displays a message that says: ERROR of COMMUNICATION.  I tried using a different USB cable, but it does not help.  Recently, this problem started to occur.  Previously the camera would upload photos to a computer very well.

  I would like any suggestions or solutions.

  Hello

  I suggest you follow the advice given by Rohit Lydia from following link and check if this can help:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-pictures/importing-pictures-one-SD-card-works-other-doesn ' t/45626c6b-375d-4815-824f-f408522607a3? tab = MoreHelp

  I hope this helps.

• Overflow on line error 1727 and 1733 battery when I login in my email account online.

  It is on a single computer only. I ran CCleaner on the registry and it did not help. This problem just started in the last week.

  Help, please. Thank you.

  I changed browsers Google Chrome and all is well now. Chrome is far

  higher speed compared to IE.

• Insert + 1.7976931348623155E308 in overflow digital column ORA-01426

  I'm porting an application that used a large double value of Java (MAX - 1 d = + 1.7976931348623155E308) as a semaphore to indicate a condition. I can't understand how to set the column to accept this value without giving in to the error: ORA-01426: digital overflow. I tried various details of the FLOAT (upward through 126) and DOUBLE_PRECISION and BINARY_DOUBLE and tried a trigger to use TO_BINARY_DOUBLE - all have failed. I use 11g. DB2 accepts DOUBLE as a data type and treats this value.
  
  --------------------------------------------------------
  -The DOF for Table TEST (generated from specification BINARY_DOUBLE for COLUMN1)
  --------------------------------------------------------
  
  CREATE TABLE 'DB2ADMIN. "' TEST '.
  ("COLUMN1" BINARY_DOUBLE
  ) CREATION OF IMMEDIATE SEGMENT
  PCTFREE, PCTUSED, INITRANS 40 10 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS SLAUGHTER
  STORAGE (INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645)
  PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS USER_TABLES DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT 1)
  TABLESPACE 'SYSTEM '.
  
  Insert test values (column1) (+ 1.7976931348623155E308);
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-01426: digital overflow

  Try this:

  insert into test (column1) values (to_binary_double('1.7976931348623155E308'));
  

  Worked for me:

  SQL> desc t
  Name Type          Nullable Default Comments
  ---- ------------- -------- ------- --------
  A    BINARY_DOUBLE Y                         
  
  SQL> insert into t values ( to_binary_double('1.7976931348623155E308') );
  
  1 row inserted
  

  Published by: Marcus Rangel on sept 19, 2012 11:34

• Error: You do not have a compatible Digital Publishing plug-ins.  Version 28.0.0 (Mac os)

  Hello

  I am trying to install the last update of the tools of DPS in to my CS6 on my Macbook. I get a message error "you have not a plug-in compatible digital publication.

  Please someone correct accordingly, please share.

  Kind regards

  Mohan

  Try solution 2 in this article:

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/Digital-Publishing-Suite/KB/error-do-have-compatible-digital.html

• Internal error to advise

  Hi all

  We use 5 APEX and are facing an "internal error" when we try to sart, our Advisor for 1 or more page (s).

  This problem seems to occur the moment where Patch 5.0 .1 has been installed.

  Steps to follow:

  Log-in to our workspace

  -Click on "Builder Application.

  -Select the application followed by "utilities".

  -Go to 'advise '.

  -Fill in the number of page (s)

  -Start check

  = > 'Internal error' is triggered.

  News Server/DB:

  OS: IBM AIX 7.1 64-bit Power

  DB: database Oracle 12 c Enterprise Edition Release 12.1.0.2.0 - 64 bit Production

  If anyone has found a solution for this, I would be happy to hear it.

  Kind regards

  Kim

  Hi Kim,

  I was able to track down what is causing the error. Your last page with # 9999999999999 (report 1) causes an error of digital overflow in the package advising internal. After deleting the page Advisor works very well. It looks that we treat this huge page # very well. I will file a bug for this.

  Concerning

  Patrick

• raise errors ora-01426 truncating the table

  Hello
  
  We have a process that runs in the following process for some tabls game
  1 disable constraints
  2. the truncating tables
  3. activation of the constraints
  
  but after treatment for 5 tables, truncating up error
  
  BEGIN < process name >; END;
  
  
  
  *
  
  ERROR on line 1:
  
  ORA-01426: digital overflow
  
  ORA-06512: at the "< procedurename >", line 33
  
  ORA-06512: at line 1
  
  
  This line 33 point to run immeidate ' truncate table < table name >
  
  Can I know what is the reason for throwing "digital overflow" error truncating the table...
  
  Thanks in advance

  user9080289 wrote:
  Thank you.

  Is my verision of oracle 11g

  Then, you could have the described bug. Follow the instructions how to bypass (flush with low-value stats monitoring) or apply the #8226471 patch.

  Nicolas.

• Try to write data to the file, but error 200279

  I have problems when writing data to a file. 10 seconds in the recording process, I get the error 200279. I did some research on the subject, but I am unable to corect my code. I think I want to increase the size of the buffer, but he prefers, I suppose, to read the data more frequently. The way that I save my file is, before starting the VI, I attribute a location and name of the file (e.g. data.csv). The date and time is added at the end of the actual when file the I start to record the data (e.g. data_07-26 - 13_122615.csv). If the file does not exist, it creates a new file, and then adds the data of this file after each iteration of the loop. The reason why I did this way was so I don't have to worry about running out of memory, but apparently my code is wrong.

  

  

  I will include a copy of the faulty section of my code. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Your problem is that the writing on the disk is slow.  It is pretty slow so it causes your DAQ buffer overflow and cause error and loss of data.  What you need to do is to implement a producer/consumer.  This will put the data acquisition and recording on the disc in separate loops.  This will allow data acquisition work at speed, that he needs to deal with incoming samples and writing on disk can run at all what pace, he can.  You send data from data acquisition to the loop of logging using a queue.

  You can also think about changing how you write to the file.  VI is constantly open and close the file, which is a very slow process if you do it inside a loop.

• SPI digital library

  I got an error while bus spi using schema-block vis.the Library Digital spi and the error list are included... Please help me.

  GAM says:

  I did not understand the signals they use to the sub screws.

  ?????  signals?

  Open one of the VI sending.  There must be a broken arrow running also.  Click on it and see what they say.

• overflow in the interim results of data types

  Hi all

  I'm sorry, this is a very basic question...

  I have the following expression, giving me an unexpected result because overflow:

  D1 = RoundRealToNearestInteger (i1 * l1 / l2);

  D1 is of type double, l1, l2 of type long int and i1 of the type ssize_t (on a 32-bit computer, i.e. signed int);

  for example using the digital the values of l1 = 14577, l2 = 1568, i1 = 156142 I find myself with d1 being negative (-1.287554e6);

  This happens if the result of the multiplication is greater than 31 bits (signed int).

  In fact, I would have expected that the intermediate result would be long integer (long int int times) or double type (implicit cast), but it seems to be of type int...

  Y at - it a 'rule' what type of data medium is used and can be expected in such a case?

  BTW, I am aware that I can avoid the problem by reorganizing the calculation: l1 / l2 * i1

  Thank you!

  Wolfgang,

  C basic rule for arithmetic calculations, is that all the items concerned are promoted to the highest current type. Thus, for example, that if you multiply an int by a tank, the tank is first promoted to an int, then the multiplication is performed. (This is why you must explicitly cast a variable to a double - the compiler then automatically will encourage others to double). In your example, the largest involved type is a 32-bit int, (even the long type) so this is what would be used for calculations. This gives a digital overflow, a standard C compiler just do not know. As the function you use takes a double parameter in any case, the final result of the calculations all over will be converted twice, but only after integers was carried out. The right solution is to first l1 or i1 to a double cast.

  (Note: there is an ambiguity in the ANSI specification on how many parameters are encouraged.) Some interpretations are that all the parameters in an expression are converted before the calculations are made, other whole-hearted are that only the two components of a single operation are put in correspondence. So, in your example, it would be unwise to simply throw l2 duplicate - it may work, but it is not guaranteed to be portable between compilers.)

  JR