Disconnect the type def LV2013

Similar Questions

• Modification of the properties-type def drop-down list box

  I have a group of 32 cases of a def type. The def type contains several different types of control. What I have to do is to change the properties of the list box for each of the type defs. Normally, I would create an array of references to change the properties for each of the type defs, but when I try this I can not access the properties of string [] for combo box selections. The only way I found to fix it is to create a reference for each individual drop-down list box item. It is labour, since I'll have 32 elements. Is there a way to beeter to do this? The first screenshot shows the issui I'll have, not being able to change the properties of specific elements within each of the def type at runtime through a control [] array. The second screenshot shows the only solution I've found so far, which is not very practical.

  You will need to set up (for a more specific class) control to a type of combo box for the particular control [] index that has the combobox control if you want to access the drop-down list.

  You can also access the combobox in a cluster based directly, rigth click on the control reference and a link to the element cluster directly.

  The last option is to make the strictt of typdef will fill all instances with the channel list [] given that it is a strict property.

  the approach is based on the weather, you plan on changing the list during execution.

• How to add or edit data in a file Type Def CTL?

  I'm learning the mode with the RIO evaluation package more recent fiscal year to "create a real-time Application.  I want to do something simple to change the function to output audio to produce waveforms that I do in addition to the included "ding" sounds "boing", etc..  I believe that (1) the data are contained in the SoundOptions.CTL file, and (2) I can use "export to Clipboard" to display the data in the existing table, and (3) in the Panel before the Type Def CTL, I can add a new element of the Enum.  My question: how to associate my new element an array of data new1D?  Or modify existing data to different waveforms?

  Thank you!

  JEB

  
  

• Is it possible to open a control of type-def as string programmaticly combobox control, change it and then close by nodes invoke/property?

  This may sound crazy; but I was looking through methods and solution properties do the following:

  1. Open a cluster of type strict-def.
  
  
  2. Add an element in a chain of the Combobox control.
  
  
  3. Register the control.
  
  
  4. Close the type-def.

  LabVIEW provides the tools to do this within its broad range of pallets?

  Second step is easy, as long as the control or parent cluster is not a strict type def.

  G.R.

  It's tedious, but simple using the VI server / scripting.  First of all, make sure that the elements of additional scripts are enabled in the VI server options.  Now open the typedef as you would a VI.  In the scripts, a typedef is like a VI with no block diagram, only a front panel and control.  You can get a reference to the control that you need to change in one of the following two ways:

  1. Open its containers from top to bottom, using the reference container as the entrance to the owner for the opening of the new control.
  
  
  2. Use of the crosses in the script palette VI

  In all cases, after change it, save using recording method tools and you should be good to go.  The most difficult part is to get the reference to the control.  If you are having problems, let us know.

• Cluster Type def. array of cluster Type def vs. -best practices?

  Hi all, I'm creating a cluster which is used inside tables throughout my code, of course, I'll need to group and ungroup it several times. My question is:

  Which is preferable? Defining the type def as a cluster, and then add it to a table where it is needed? or by defining the type def as an array of this cluster? It seems to me that it would be preferable to define the type as cluster so def when you group or ungroup it you don't need to index the table first, right?

  Thank you

  Jose

  JMotaB wrote:

  Hi all, I'm creating a cluster which is used inside tables throughout my code, of course, I'll need to group and ungroup it several times. My question is:

  Which is preferable? Defining the type def as a cluster, and then add it to a table where it is needed? or by defining the type def as an array of this cluster? It seems to me that it would be preferable to define the def type as cluster then when you group or ungroup it you don't need to index the table first, no?

  Thank you

  Jose

  Agreed.

  I rarely type tables def but almos always type the cluster that I put in them.

  Ben

• Variant of incompatible Type Def cluster

  I get an error trying to write to index 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, but no error when write to index 19, 25, 26, 28, 29. The error I get is the variant of cluster data type is not not compatible. Any ideas on a fix?

  Instead of writing to the property node, change it to read and check the output variant for clues. No doubt this will help. eg. 20 the index the output is false.

  I apologize for mentioning the same thing as the crows. You have essentially overlapped digital control and a Boolean button (the text string). If the order is confusing when you look at the type def. What you need to do is, separate all controls overlap, number them (reorganize) according to your need and then redraw the structure (type def).

• Type defs are not updating

  I am new to using type defs and was undergoing the vacant only if i updated the type def (add or remove a selection) can now control all constants related to the control and the case would be updated.

  This doesn't seem to be the case. I remove and reinsert the control, and then find each constant in my diagram and remove and reinsert and it really meses cases. I have to remove both 'red' and make sure that are without doubles in my case.

  What I'm doing wrong here? Type Defs were suppose to do this try?

  Looks like you have left the control as a regular "custom control" and it has not changed to "typedef".

  

  Or do you keep the window open editor control when you make a change in the typedef? If so, the change is spreading until you save and close the control editor or select file-> apply the changes (if you want to open the editor control window).

• problem with the tab control type def

  Hello community,

  There is still much more to learn more about LabVIEW.

  I have a tab control which is a (non-strict) type definition. It has 5 tabs with indicators.

  When I open type def and insert another tab, say three position and close type def, the tab on my fp control will of course win the additional tab.

  But the new number three tab will contain this as the former number tab three content and only the last tab will be empty.

  This isn't what I wanted. I think that I am doing it wrong.

  Is it possible to get an empty tab posted on three without defeat the purpose of a def type (because obviously I could decouple the def of type control, insert the tab and do a new type def).

  Best regards

  Florian

  Florian,

  I hope that you will display the tab as a user interface control in one place. In this case, you can have a typedef enum to subVIs and disconnect the the typedef tab control.

  Thank you

  George S

• LabVIEW FPGA. Where should I put the custom controls - or type defs in a project

  Hello

  Maybe this is a stupid question - but I'm a little confused on where within a project I should put the controls (or type defs) used in FPGA screws.  If you put in the bit "module FPGA" project, so they come up as "dependencies" - as if they are not in the project within the project when you read/write values in the target FPGA.  Also, it seems that if you copy the project to a different location folder then the FPGA vi can be distributed in a way that she needs to be recompiled - even if you don't change anything - that's not cool if it takes an hour or two to compile.

  I had the controls in the external project for awhile - but seems not ideal from the point of view modular programming, and also, it seems that it may also cause the recompilation unnessary - although perhaps less often that put them in the FPGA subproject.

  Any thoughts?

  I've seen the same behavior and it is a fact that the code must be recompiled if you move a project even if the FPGA code is unchanged. From my point of view, it's a real BUG. This is independent of any file source or target FPGA.

  The other point of your question is not clear relly. Of course, you will get the dependencies if you place the necessary files outside the structure of the target project. But I see no problem to reference them twice because it won't double the source itself. So I suggest to refer to these files several times in the project structure. Actually I'm doing this because I manage a project file LV with different targets CRIO where the complete code for the target FPGA is double referenced under each target.

  It may be useful

  Christian

• Enum (type def) - structure of the case called update error

  Hello

  1. One of my (type def) enums is not updated the names of structure cases. I found something that looks like a probable error in the case where the structure,
  2. I had created one of the constants in the enumeration before I did a typedef. Therefore, I made new constants since the typedef and replace the original ones. and still, the structure of the case is not being updated.

  How can I solve this?

  also, I have one state machine inside the other. Is this right way to program?

  

  Somewhere in your code, you have the wrong typedef, or don't replace a control by the typedef. Must not have replaced all. I don't know if there is an easy way to search for; You may need to go through anyway.

• the stress points and Strict Type Def

  I created a Strict Type Def cluster with Boolean flags.

  I am unbundling of the cluster and some outputs unbundled wiring a slot - VI that I created. This subVIs input is connected directly to the entrance of the selector of a function add channels of true/false.

  It works, but I'm trying to understand why there is a stress point at the when the output of the cluster is connected to the Subvi. Is the reason why, because the cluster is a strict Type Def?

  If I have unbundled a cluster output wiring usually no constraint points appear.

  Turn on your help window,

  Using the wire tool,

  Float over the wires and compare what you see in the Help window.

  I suspect type-def def untyped is being stated by the cooecion point.

  rant value = True

  This scenario is one of the reasons why I freak out on the rumor that the stress points involve a copy of the buffer. They do NOT. LV said you only he does something for the representation of data and you want to inform you about it.

  Done ranting,

  Ben

• How it happened and how to prevent it: type def cluster change causes the element starts up again

  Hi all

  I have a big nested type nested def cluster, several layers.  I have remove the clusters to use the feature "name" to use it.

  Somehow changing the def of big type causes unlustered elements starts up again.

  For example, the element is the element clustered and used, then after I modified the def type, I don't remember how, maybe remove some items, perhaps rename elements, then the element where B is the unlustered element and used.

  It is very scary because it just happened automatically and no broken error reported and this can spoil the entire application.

  It happen to someone else? How to prevent it?

  Many thanks for any help.

  Anne

  A search on 'Ben', 'cluster' 'type def' to see that I've been bitten in the same way.

  The earch will reveal the various things that have been suggested according to the version of LV

  First rule of ben from cluster

  Avoid like the plague by deleting or renaming items.

  Other stuff:

  If you need to remove an item, change its representation to something that will break all instances for example change digital chain. Then go all the broken VI difficulty by throwing all the refs for the field you want to delte. And then delete.

  in the LV ealier version, better all the screws that use clusters that open when the change is made.

  In the recent version that neither recommended edititng cluster with all the appellants closed with the theory being that LV handles better the opening of VI.

  Given that I am "Of Ben first rule of the cluster" I don't run in the bug often with LV 2009.

  Ben

• error "the type of the sink is zero.

  I just made a change to a subvi to move terminal input. Control is a cluster type-def of 33 items. Everything that was done was to disconnect the Terminal in the connector sub - vi pane and move it to a different slot. Now when I try to rewiring of the sub - vi I get a cut wire and an error message "you have connected two terminals of different types. The type of the source is typedef ' Blah.ctl 'cluster of 33 items. The type of the sink is zero. This happens even if I click on terminal of the sub - vi of the upper vi and "create a control. The control is created successfully, but the wire is broken with this error message. Curiously, if I go to the subvi, create and identical order, wire to the open, the problem of the upper echelon is resolved. I tried to change the connector pane selection, forcing a repeat, no joy. I also tried to save everything and restart LabVIEW (v 2010 on Windows XP), got a "there was an error in the last run LabVIEW (fpsane) or want to solve problems. I get the error 'silent' crazy corrupt sub - vi?

  "Tough luck" Seems I've corrected, but don't know how. I added the second terminal, it didn't fix it. LabVIEW, rebooted, no error message at startup. When I open the the original broken wire broken vi was no longer there, but there was still a broken arrow. Clicking on it showed a "phantom wire' connected from the most recently added (add entry only to try to duplicate a previous"fix") connected to a Terminal unallocated. Have not seen this before.

• password type def

  Hi all

  I want to do a def type or type strict def (not sure that it would be) a password, so that is the password must be updated, I can just change the password in the type type def/strict def and the change will apply to all programs that use the constant/control of password?  How?  Thank you!

  Yik

  You could just put the constant (string) into a vi that has this, which could then be used everywhere. Change he would spread to all the places it is used. Or you could do a typedef is enum, recovery of control 'strings []' with a property node, for the comparison of your password. I put in form encrypted to a text file, read during the initialization of the program, which allows me to change without having to recompile the program. In many environments it is no such thing as a small change program, no recompilation, reconstruction, requires a rigorous new test/requalification to absolutely confirm that the functionality of the program has not changed. That's why I try to not hardcode the constants universal ones, like pi.

• Photo ring Type Def not updated

  I have a ring of photo type def.  I used it in an another vi.  At the time, the ring of photography has only 5 photos in there.  Later, I added another image to the ring of pic type def, but not a not updated of the vi.  Why is this?

  Given a ring of photo is just another type of ring, see if these appy son message

  Ring type constant def not updated for LabVIEW 2010 SP1

  strict type of ring bat bug?

  Strict Type def with Menu ring does not automatically update the related constants