Disorders of Singleton...

Similar Questions

• Disorders of the IdeaPad Y570 sleep/hibernation

  Hello everyone: Lenovo customers and the team.

  About a month ago, I've got Lenovo Y570 (i7 of second generation, 8 GB RAM, 750 GB HARD disk and so on).

  In fact, I am satisfied of this laptop, but here's a very boring question - disorders of the sleep/hibernate.

  I installed Windows 7 x 64 Ultimate instead of original Windows 7 Home.

  Then I installed all cooler Windows updates (SP1 and all others until today) and all updates for everything (drivers) from lenovo.com

  The problem is:

  (1) sleep mode - when it happens, if I interrupt bit - 5-10 minutes, everything is OK, awake computer. BUT if it stay for long - about 20-30 minutes, when I come back I have meet BSOD with message 'something about power. " I have dumps, if it is necessary.

  (2) hibernation. Each second hibernate leads to-screen sets out of State, formerly the powerfully flashing and then just nothing, computer HARD drive-based stay with black screen, all of the lights on the Panel WE still, power is always on and I can't do it-just to turn OFF with the round power button press.

  I tried all the possible solutions - to use power settings, hybrid sleep and hybrids, all modes, all solutions of the internet and my own mind - without success.

  Prior to Y570, I've owned Y530 and same configuration of Windows 7, etc - it has no problems with sleep/hibernate implementation.

  Please help me with this?

  Thank you for attention

  PS You forgot to say! Sometimes, when I use hibernate - laptop is in hibernation, but shortly after turning off the power - it's on (after 1-2 seconds of the OFF state). Yes, I've checked everything - off set "Wake up" function of each device excluded just keyboard, leave all possible wake timers and so on.

  
  

• WHY IS THERE NO PARENTAL CONTROLS FILTERS ASSOCIATED WITH EATING DISORDERS?

  I know that I can ban specific websites using Parental control filters, but when Microsoft will add a way to filter the news of dangerous on weight loss, dieting, etc.. ? It is too easy for children to find the BMI calculators, feeding sites and other things of that nature and mistreat them. I could turn on each single parental control and my child would probably still managed to use a search engine to access a Web site that could be detrimental to her recovery. I can't type in a thousand of banned sites. It would just be easier to ban its ability to search for a specific word.

  So I would like to see a filter added to Vista, XP, and Internet Explorer that allows me to forbid my child looking for a specific word associated with consumption of issues, issues of body image, eating disorders, weight loss, etc.
  These topics are just as dangerous as alcohol, nudity, blasphemy, weapons, etc. IF NOT MORE SO.
  And with so much pressure from the media, there are more and more children using the internet to fuel this problem.
  It's time to give parents a chance to help protect our girls (and boys!) preventing them from surfing for such things!

  You can give your Microsoft ideas directly on this link:

  https://connect.Microsoft.com/?WA=wsignin1.0

  But there is a better way to achieve your goals, rather than through your operating system. Set up a free account at OpenDNS and choose your own filters. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• A singleton stores persistent?

  I have need of a meter of update in my application as the user will know how many notifications they have. The number of notifications appear on the homepage next to the icon. The way I am followed by the variable of the icon "iconCount" between different ports of entry is through a singleton. I need to have this indictment to be present even after the user turns off their device power on and off. If there are 7 updates available for them 7 will be displayed until they check the application (it will not be reset to 0 when the unit is off).

  As a test to see what would happen if I put the number 7 and turns the unit off via the Simulator; I pressed the power button until it says "turn the power off, press any key to quit" and then the screen went black. I waited a few seconds and press the hang up and the Simulator turned on to show the new 7 notifications.

  It is a bit strange for me, I have even if you need a persistent store to achieve? I was setting off the device correctly, or a singleton actually holds the variable even after that the power is off.

  There is a difference between an app off (key grip) or off button and a hard turn off (battery pull). a soft off suspends the requests, and they wake up again when the power turn once again.

  If you remove the battery (or close the Simulator) all non-persistent values are lost.

• How to implement the class Singleton cascading C++

  I tried to use the standard C++ to implement the Singleton class. It can be compiled well, there's always a mistake to link "Description Resource path location Type cannot declare the member function ' static globalsettings * globalsettings::instance() ' static linking [-fpermissive] problem of C/C++.

  Can anyone have a look of my source code to know what is the problem of it? Thank you.

  /*
   * globalsettings.h
   */
  
  #ifndef GLOBALSETTINGS_H_#define GLOBALSETTINGS_H_
  
  class Globalsettings {public:    Globalsettings();    virtual ~Globalsettings();
  
      int get_value();    void set_value(int v);
  
      static Globalsettings &instance();
  
  private:    int m_value;
  
      static Globalsettings *s_instance;};
  
  #endif
  

  Wrong with the CPP:

  /*
   * globalsettings.cpp
   *
   */
  
  #include "globalsettings.h"
  
  Globalsettings*  Globalsettings::s_instance = 0;
  
  Globalsettings::Globalsettings() {
      s_instance = 0;
      m_value = 0;
  }
  
  Globalsettings::~Globalsettings() {
      s_instance = 0;
  }
  
  static Globalsettings& Globalsettings::instance() {
      if (!s_instance)
        s_instance = new Globalsettings();
      return *s_instance;
  }
  
  int Globalsettings::get_value()
  {
      return m_value;
  }
  void Globalsettings::set_value(int v)
  {
      m_value = v;
  }
  

  CPP revised (it works)

  /*
   * globalsettings.cpp
   *
   */
  
  #include "globalsettings.h"
  
  Globalsettings*  Globalsettings::s_instance = 0;
  
  Globalsettings::Globalsettings() {
      s_instance = 0;
      m_value = 0;
  }
  
  Globalsettings::~Globalsettings() {
      s_instance = 0;
  }
  
  Globalsettings& Globalsettings::instance() {
      if (!s_instance)
        s_instance = new Globalsettings();
      return *s_instance;
  }
  
  int Globalsettings::get_value()
  {
      return m_value;
  }
  void Globalsettings::set_value(int v)
  {
      m_value = v;
  }
  

  UPD:

  1)

  static globalsettings *s_instance;
  

  This should be in the private section.

  2)

  static globalsettings *instance();
  

  This should be public, so the user can call.

  3)

  Delete 'static' keyword to the .cpp file.

  Even easier approach with late initialization:

  all in 1):

  static MyClass *sharedInstance();
  

  (2) in the .cpp:

  MyClass *MyClass::sharedInstance()
  {
    static MyClass instance;
    return &instance;
  }
  

• SIngleton and BlackBerry - need help

  Hi all

  I was wondering:

  If I want to make sure only one instance of my application is running - should I use the Singleton Pattern or not only the operating system of BB takes care of this?

  If I start the emulator once it, be it downloaded whenever I'll re - compile and rerun? (I mean the first round)

  My application is a PhoneListener application with a GUI, nothing complicated.

  Thank you!

  Not sure I understand the question.

  When you run the emulator, your application is is started during the boot process (if you have set the option to auto-start your project), or it is not. Each restart of the Simulator is basically the same as the device to start.

  If you do not have the autostart property set, then your application starts when you click the icon. If you exit the application and click on the new icon, your application is restarted.

  You can keep your application running in the background you override the close() method in your top-level window and perform a "requestbackground()". Then your application is reinstated through the method "activate()' rather than being rebooted.

  All this is covered faily well in the development of RIM software guide and the sample applications provided with the JDE.

• Static Singleton instance reference gets cleaned memory!

  OK, it's one of the strangest things I've ever seen.

  I am currently working on a project where I use a singleton like this:

  public class SingletonExample {  private static SingletonExample instance; private Vector listeners; private PhoneListener phoneListener;
  
    private SingletonExample(){       listeners = new Vector();     phoneListener = new PhoneListenerImpl();  }
  
    public static synchronized SingletonExample getInstance(){        if(instance == null){         instance = new SingletonExample();        }     return instance;  }
  
    public synchronized void addListener(SomeListener listener){      if(listener != null){         synchronized(listeners){              listeners.addElement(listener);               if(listeners.size() == 1){                    Phone.addPhoneListener(phoneListener);                }         }                 } }
  
    public synchronized void removeListener(SomeListener listener){       if(listener != null){         synchronized(listeners){              if(listeners.contains(listener)){                 listeners.removeElement(listener);                }                 if(listeners.isEmpty()){                  Phone.removePhoneListener(phoneListener);             }         }                 } }
  
    private void reportListeners(){       synchronized(listeners){          int sz = listeners.size();            for(int i = 0; i < sz; i++){               final SomeListener sl = (SomeListener) listeners.elementAt(i);                new Thread(){                 public void run(){                        sl.onListenerReported();                  }             }.start();            }     } }
  
    private class PhoneListenerImpl implements PhoneListener {        public void callAdded(int arg0) {}
  
        public void callAnswered(int arg0) {}
  
         public void callConferenceCallEstablished(int arg0) {}
  
        public void callConnected(int arg0) {     }
  
         public void callDirectConnectConnected(int arg0) {}
  
       public void callDirectConnectDisconnected(int arg0) {}
  
        public void callDisconnected(int arg0) {          reportListeners();            }
  
         public void callEndedByUser(int arg0) {           reportListeners();                }
  
         public void callFailed(int arg0, int arg1) {          reportListeners();                    }
  
         public void callHeld(int callId) {}
  
       public void callIncoming(int callId) {}
  
       public void callInitiated(int callid) {}
  
          public void callRemoved(int callId) {}
  
        public void callResumed(int callId) {}
  
        public void callWaiting(int callid) {}
  
        public void conferenceCallDisconnected(int callId) {} }}
  

  (Not the best singleton, but very safe and is the one I usually use).

  Want to-be-singleton class contains a collection of the listener (I have not included SomeListener interface, but it is very simple, only an onListenerReported of the method). Also contains an instance of PhoneListener. When a call is disconnected, the class of SingletonExample should report each listener on a new Thread.

  Now the collections on static variables is subject to leaks memory, but this class is intended to contain only one or two listeners at a time, so there is not much. And as we are about to see, the static integer variable 'instance' is going to be garbage collected between "consecutive" calls to getInstance.

  Now, I have a method like this, taken from a menu action:

  public void someMethodFiredFromMenu() {  new Thread(){     public void run(){
  
            SomeListener listener = new SomeListener(){               public void onListenerReported() {                    System.out.println(">>>>>>> Call disconnected!");
  
                    //FIXME: Singleton static member is null at this point,                   // so it is constructed again!!!                  SingletonExample.getInstance().removeListener(this);
  
                    //Do other things here                                    }                                     };
  
            //First call to getInstance, static member is constructed as expected         SingletonExample.getInstance().addListener(listener);     } }.start();}
  

  If test you it on a 4.7 Simulator I (BlackBerry 9530 Simulator, v4.7.0.75) you can see that the static variable singleton (named 'instance' within class SingletonExample) is collected between calls to someMethodFiredFromMenu.

  It never happened to me before. Somehow, that there are two threads involved, the JAVA virtual machine (if we can call it ) determines that the variable is more accessible and collects, thus screwing my design.

  Interesting things:

  Make two consecutive getInstance calls in the same thread works.

  Holding a last reference to the SingletonExample within the method of the menu and its use (even in different threads) also works.

  * Note: I've changed a few names from my original code, so there are compilation errors, but at least you know what the code meant.

  It is a feature of the BlackBerry JVM and what others have stumbled on before, including me.

  The best way to summarize the problem is that a static is only a Singleton when the static object references are in the same instance of the Application.

  Another way to say it is that each instance of the Application has its own set of static variables.

  The problem here is that you code earphone is running an application, which will have a set of difference of static variables for your Application.

  Here the best way to create a Singleton in a BlackBerry

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Java-development/create-a-singleton-using-the-RuntimeStore/TA...

  That said, I would recommend that you avoid treatment on the earpiece - if you can only use global event to convey the information for your Application, then it can be handled in your Application and static object is a Singleton!

  A bit off-topic and just because I'm here, but what's the point of the Thread in this treatment?

  public void someMethodFiredFromMenu() {}
  New Thread() {}
  public void run() {}

  SomeListener listener = new SomeListener() {}
  public void onListenerReported() {}
  System.out.println ("> call disconnected!");

  FIXME: Singleton static member is NULL at this point,
  Thus, it is built again!
  SingletonExample.getInstance () .removeListener (this);
  Do other things here
  }
  };

  First call to getInstance static member is built as planned
  SingletonExample.getInstance () .addListener (listener);
  }
  }. start();
  }

• UiApplication - implementation RuntimeStore vs make Singleton object / Instance

  Hi all

  I ran into a lot of trouble with putting the UiApplication instance in the RuntimeStore for later retrieval of etc. other entry points.  I used the code of this resource (http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/Java-Development/Make-a-running-UI-application-go-to-the-back...)

  //register the alternate on first run
  RuntimeStore appReg = RuntimeStore.getRuntimeStore();
  synchronized(appReg){
     if (appReg.get(ID) == null) {
         appReg.put(ID, new Application(...));
     }
     Application MyApp = (Application)appReg.waitFor(ID);
     //then you have the app MyApp... return it or whatever
  }
  

  //check to see if the app exists, if it does, bring it to the foreground ...RuntimeStore appReg = RuntimeStore.getRuntimeStore();synchronized(appReg){   if (appReg.get(ID) != null){       Application MyApp = (Application)appReg.waitFor(ID);       MyApp.requestForground();   }}
  

  but UiApplication.getUiApplicationInstance (); Returns IllegalStateException.

  I have posted this before and have read that I might be better to create a Singleton instance of my UiApplication - can I get some advice about how to achieve?  The code I think I should reference is:

  import net.rim.device.api.system.*;
  
  class MySingleton {
     private static MySingleton _instance;
     private static final long GUID = 0xab4dd61c5d004c18L;
  
     // constructor
     MySingleton() {}
  
     public static MySingleton getInstance() {
        if (_instance == null) {
           _instance = (MySingleton)RuntimeStore.getRuntimeStore().get(GUID);
        if (_instance == null) {
  
           MySingleton singleton = new MySingleton();
  
           RuntimeStore.getRuntimeStore().put(GUID, singleton);
           _instance = singleton;
           }
        }
  
        return _instance;
  
     }
  }
  

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Sorry, I have not looked at your code in detail.  Simon and I wanted to understand what your application was trying to do, rather than how he did.

  What you have described so far, there is no need to put your UiApplication in RuntimeStore.  Or do you need an AlternateEntry.

  So let us try to see if we can get your app working the way you want without steps.  I'm not saying that we will succeed, but trying, we and you will understand better opportunities.

  But note that this is only my opinion and here's how I would implement what you're trying to do, with a single application. I could be missing something.

  Let's start with the listeners.

  Some listeners require a current request - for example SystemListener.  Some are not, for example telephone headsets.  Treatment is kept on a warm reboot - for example, most of the non networking Threads will be suspended and restarted.  Some are not, for example, the ApplicationMenuItems are deleted.

  Assume that at least one of your listeners requires an Application.  In general, I do not use an Application, because I use SystemListener so that I can terminate my treatment in extinction and restart under power.  Which means that you must have an Application that is started automatically.

  Now, you also want to have an icon.  Since an icon is supposed to start a UiApplication, then let us do your started automatically asks a UiApplication.  To do this, you really push a screen, but it can also "requestBackground()", so that it does not actually appear in the autostart.

  The complication here is that some of this treatment actually impossible in the early stages of implementation service, so you need to check for

  ApplicationManager... inStartUp)

  and treat them accordingly.  There is an article that describes what I think.

  So now we have one started automatically UiApplication, who listens to the system start and stop and everything stops at the stop and everything begins to start.

  Now, when you click the icon, you will not actually start your application, you're just before an existing UiApplication.

  I think that so far we have matching your needs with one exception.  What happens if you want to restart your Application?

  We have already described code that stops the processing of your request - we will work this in extinction.  You just need to run that and then do a system.exit().  Now, when your hand is called, the next time that the user clicks on the icon, it will be started just as if it was during the auto-start and will go through the same initialization.  The trick is this time, you don't want to do the requestBackground.

  Here is the key.

  (1) an initialization routine that adds the headphones and starts the other treatment.  This will also push the initial screen.

  (2) an interrupt routine that stops the treatment started in the initialization routine

  (3) main routine creates the UiApplication and adds it as a SystemListener and enterTheDisplatcher.  It checks to see if the treatment is inStartUp.

  (a) if so it horizons application - initialization will be done by the power of SystemListener.

  (b) otherwise, it executes the initialization routine

  (4) SystemListener powerUp routine that performs the initialization routine

  (5) powerOff routine SystemListener which runs the completion routine

  (6) output in your application that runs the completion routine and then call system.exit().

  I think that if you implement these parts, you will have a DBMS which deals with the way you want, with no RuntimeStorage and no AlternateEntry.

• Approach to singleton for screens

  Hello

  I would like to know if it is advisable to use a singleton pattern when you push the screen on the stack.

  For example:

  package com.xyz.mobile;

  Import net.rim.device.api.ui.container.MainScreen;

  SerializableAttribute public class EntryScreen extends form {}

  Private Shared EntryScreen thisInstance = null;
     
  private EntryScreen() {}
  Super();
  TODO initialize the fields here
  }
     
  public static getInstance() {} EntryScreen
  {if(thisInstance==null)}
  thisInstance = new EntryScreen();
  }
  Return thisInstance;
  }
     
  }

  Now in my application UI I would call:

  pushScreen (EntryScreen.getInstance ());

  The advantage I see is I would not re - initialize my fields whenever I want to push the EntryScreen in the stack. Is this recommended practice. ? Kindly guide me with this.

  Thanking you,

  Kind regards

  S.A.Norton Stanley

  If you have a reference to the screen, it will not change.

  You can do
  YourScreen yourScreen = new YourScreen();
  pushScreen (yourScreen);
  popScreen (yourScreen);
  pushScreen (yourScreen);
  etc.

• Timers and Singletons

  A little history about what I want my app to do first.  I am writing a program to turn on my wifi on and off at a scheduled time.  For example, to turn on the wifi at 19:30, turn it off at 08:00 the next day.  Here's how the program works.  There are 2 entry points for statup auto code and one for the GUI.  The autostartup reads dates (if any) of the persistent store and planning timers accordingly.  Then if the user opens the graphical user interface, they are presented with 2 selectors field dates to set the on and off time again.  When recording these data, it should write back to the store, cancel the current timmer and plan new timers.  Here's the code.  For brevity, I have excluded which, in my view, are not relevant.

  //imports
  public class WifiScheduler extends UiApplication
  {
      public static void main(String[] args)
      {
          if (args.length > 0 && args[0].equals("autostartup"))
          {
          //read data from store             //do some parsing to get date values for dateOn and dateOff
  
              GlobalTimer myTimer = GlobalTimer.getInstance();
              myTimer.setTimer(dateOn,dateOff);
          }
          else
          {
              WifiScheduler app = new WifiScheduler();
              app.enterEventDispatcher();
          }
      }
      public WifiScheduler()
      {
          pushScreen( new SchedulerScreen() );
      }
  }
  

  //imports
  public class SchedulerScreen extends MainScreen
  {
      public SchedulerScreen()
      {
        // setup date fields and add to vertical field manager
      }
      public static long stringToDate(String temp)
      {
        //convert a string to date format
      }
      protected boolean onSave()
      {
          //add new values to persistent store
          //get values for dateOn and dateOff
  
          GlobalTimer myTimer =GlobalTimer.getInstance();
          myTimer.setTimer(dateOn, dateOff);
          return true;
      }
  }
  

  //imports
  class GlobalTimer
  {
      private static GlobalTimer _instance = null;
      private static final long GUID = 0xab4dd61c5d114c18L;
      private Timer _timer = null;
  
      GlobalTimer()
      {
      }
  
      public static GlobalTimer getInstance()
      {
          if (_instance == null)
          {
              _instance = (GlobalTimer) RuntimeStore.getRuntimeStore().get(GUID);
              if (_instance == null)
              { // If it is still null, i.e. null in the RuntimeStore
                  GlobalTimer singleton = new GlobalTimer();
                  RuntimeStore.getRuntimeStore().put(GUID, singleton);
                  _instance = singleton;
              } // inner if
          } // outer if
          return _instance;
      } // getInst
  
      public void killTimer()
      {
             //currently not using this because _timer is always null
          _timer.cancel();
      }
      public void setTimer(Date dateOn, Date dateOff)
      {
          if (_timer != null)
          {
              try
              {
                  _timer.cancel();
              }
              catch (Exception e)
              {
                  System.out.println("Could not cancel _timer");
              }
              _timer = null;
          }
                  //create new instance of timer
          //WRONG Timer _timer = new Timer();                  _timer = new Timer(); //CORRECTED                //Yes, I am aware that a delay of 5000 is not daily, it just makes debugging easier
          _timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TurnWifiOn(), dateOn, 5000);
          _timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TurnWifiOn(), dateOff, 5000);
      }
  }
  

  The problem is when I call setTimer line GUI code

  if (_timer != null)
  

  is always false, even though I know that I have and you will see a timer running from my statup code.  My singleton or my body doesn't seem to work properly.  My understanding of how this code should work that is to use the singleton I can obtain and modify a specific instance of my timer.  For any help or suggestion would be greatly appreciated.

  So it is. Now that I re-read your original post, I think that there is a totally different problem. You declare in your SetTimer()) method, a local variable _timer that hides the member variable. That's why the next time, _timer is always set to null. Try changing:

  //create new instance of timer
  Timer _timer = new Timer();
  

  TO:

  //create new instance of timer
  _timer = new Timer();
  

• Pattern Singleton MAF 2.2.0

  Hello

  I have a change in behavior after upgrade to 2.2.0 MAF. I'm not sure if this is intentional or a bug. For me, looks like a bug because it is at odds with the singleton design pattern and behavior change does occur when the application is disabled, and then press it again.

  Basically, I have a class in the ApplicationController which has been implemented in the singleton design pattern. The instance of this class (singleton) behaves as a singleton and is used by all the features. So MAF 2.1.3 which has worked. As MAF 2.2.0 instance behaves as a singleton until the application is disabled and then press it again.

  Here's the scenario:

  (1) start the application = > the singleton is created

  (2) go to any device = > the singleton is always the same instance.

  (3) turn off the app

  (4) to activate the soft

  (5) the original instance (singleton) is always available in the ApplicationLifeCycleListenerImpl as we like the functionality of the application in when he was disabled and enabled

  (6) go to any other feature = > now I have a new instance of the class that implements the singleton pattern (I did several instances)

  Everyone knows anything of this kind? I'm running on iOS.

  Kind regards

  Majdi Jaqaman

  Hello

  This has been fixed in 2.2.1 MAF.

  Kind regards

  Majdi Jaqaman

• ORA-19279: XPTY0004 - dynamic XQuery type mismatch: expected - singleton sequence got several sequence element

  Hello

  Can you please help me by questioning from the following XML code.

  under query works for the 1 iteration. but for several games I get following error.

  ORA-19279: XPTY0004 - dynamic XQuery type mismatch: expected - singleton sequence got several sequence element

  19279 00000 - "dynamic XQuery type mismatch: expected - singleton sequence got several sequence element.

  * Cause: The sequence of XQuery passed was more than one element.

  * Action: Fix the XQuery expression to return a single element of the sequence.

  Help, please

  Select X.*

  ABC evt

  , XMLTABLE (XMLNAMESPACES ('urn:swift:xsd:mtmsg.2011' AS NS2, DEFAULT 'urn:swift:xsd:fin.970.2011'),

  "$msg_xml" by PASSING EVT.col1 as 'msg_xml '.

  COLUMNS

  Path Varchar (40) F61ValueDate "/ F61/ValueDate [1]."

  Path of DebitCreditMark Varchar (40) "/ / Document/MT970/F61a/F61/DebitCreditMark [1]."

  Amount Varchar (40) path ' / / Document/MT970/F61a/F61/amount [1]. "

  Path of TransactionType Varchar (40) "/ / Document/MT970/F61a/F61/TransactionType [1]."

  Path of IdentificationCode Varchar (40) "/ / Document/MT970/F61a/F61/IdentificationCode [1]."

  Path of ReferenceForTheAccountOwner Varchar (40) "/ / Document/MT970/F61a/F61/ReferenceForTheAccountOwner [1]."

  Path of SupplementaryDetails Varchar (40) "/ / Document/MT970/F61a/F61/SupplementaryDetails [1].

  ) X

  where EVT.col2 = 2

  < FinMessage xmlns = "urn:swift:xsd:mtmsg.2011" xmlns:FinMessage ="urn:swift:xsd:mtmsg.2011" > "
  < Block1 >
  < ApplicationIdentifier > F < / ApplicationIdentifier >
  < ServiceIdentifier > 01 < / ServiceIdentifier >
  < LogicalTerminalAddress > IRVTDEFXAXXX < / LogicalTerminalAddress >
  < open > 5252 < / open >
  < SequenceNumber > 699163 < / SequenceNumber >
  < / Block1 >
  < Block2 >
  < OutputIdentifier > O < / OutputIdentifier >
  < > 970 MessageType < / MessageType >
  < > 1633 InputTime < / InputTime >
  < MessageInputReference >
  < date > 131101 < / Date >
  < LTIdentifier > EBASBEBBQ < / LTIdentifier >
  < BranchCode > XXX < / BranchCode >
  < open > 1113 < / open >
  < n > 070016 < / ISN >
  < / MessageInputReference >
  < date > 131101 < / Date >
  < time > 1634 < / Time >
  < MessagePriority > N < / MessagePriority >
  < / Block2 >
  < Block3 >
  ENS0000857017566 < F108 > < / F108 >
  < / Block3 >
  < canton4 >
  < xmlns = "urn:swift:xsd:fin.970.2011 document" xmlns:Document ="urn:swift:xsd:fin.970.2011" > "
  < MT970 >
  < F20a >
  ENS17566/END of < F20 > < / F20 >
  < / F20a >
  < F25a >
  < F25 > IRVTDEFX/EUR/131101/N < / F25 >
  < / F25a >
  < F28a >
  < F28C >
  < StatementNumber > 215 < / StatementNumber >
  < SequenceNumber > 16 < / SequenceNumber >
  < / F28C >
  < / F28a >
  < F60a >
  < F60M >
  < DCMark > D < / DCMark >
  < date > 131101 < / Date >
  < currency > EUR < / currency >
  < amount > 2686836,28 < / amount >
  < / F60M >
  < / F60a >
  < F61a >
  < F61 >
  < valueDate > 131101 < / ValueDate >
  < DebitCreditMark > D < / DebitCreditMark >
  < amount > 40248, < / amount >
  < TransactionType > S < / TransactionType >
  < IdentificationCode > 103 < / IdentificationCode >
  < ReferenceForTheAccountOwner > FX5445414 < / ReferenceForTheAccountOwner >
  < SupplementaryDetails > KREDBEBBXXXIRVTDEFXXXXN011031 < / SupplementaryDetails >
  < / F61 >
  < / F61a >
  < F61a >
  < F61 >
  < valueDate > 131101 < / ValueDate >
  < DebitCreditMark > D < / DebitCreditMark >
  < amount > 41605, < / amount >
  < TransactionType > S < / TransactionType >
  < IdentificationCode > 103 < / IdentificationCode >
  < ReferenceForTheAccountOwner > FX5443846 < / ReferenceForTheAccountOwner >
  < SupplementaryDetails > DEUTDEFFXXXIRVTDEFXXXXN011031 < / SupplementaryDetails >
  < / F61 >
  < / F61a >
  < F61a >
  < F61 >
  < valueDate > 131101 < / ValueDate >
  < DebitCreditMark > D < / DebitCreditMark >
  < amount > 43730, < / amount >
  < TransactionType > S < / TransactionType >
  < IdentificationCode > 103 < / IdentificationCode >
  < ReferenceForTheAccountOwner > C13110130526301 < / ReferenceForTheAccountOwner >
  < SupplementaryDetails > BARCGB22XXXIRVTDEFXXXXN011033 < / SupplementaryDetails >
  < / F61 >
  < / F61a >
  < F61 >
  < valueDate > 131101 < / ValueDate >
  < DebitCreditMark > D < / DebitCreditMark >
  < amount > 58000, < / amount >
  < TransactionType > S < / TransactionType >
  < IdentificationCode > 202 < / IdentificationCode >
  < ReferenceForTheAccountOwner > FXT1311010000500 < / ReferenceForTheAccountOwner >
  < ReferenceOfTheAccountServicingInstitution > FXT1311010000500 < / ReferenceOfTheAccountServicingInstitution >
  < SupplementaryDetails > BKAUATWWXXXIRVTDEFXXXXN011116 < / SupplementaryDetails >
  < / F61 >
  < / F61a >
  < F61a >
  < F61 >
  < valueDate > 131101 < / ValueDate >
  < DebitCreditMark > D < / DebitCreditMark >
  < amount > 59826,21 < / amount >
  < TransactionType > S < / TransactionType >
  < IdentificationCode > 103 < / IdentificationCode >
  < ReferenceForTheAccountOwner > FX5446070 < / ReferenceForTheAccountOwner >
  < SupplementaryDetails > CHASGB2LXXXIRVTDEFXXXXN011031 < / SupplementaryDetails >
  < / F61 >
  < / F61a >
  < F61a >
  < F61 >
  < valueDate > 131101 < / ValueDate >
  < DebitCreditMark > D < / DebitCreditMark >
  < amount > 60309,4 < / amount >
  < TransactionType > S < / TransactionType >
  < IdentificationCode > 103 < / IdentificationCode >
  < ReferenceForTheAccountOwner > 01987HS016415 < / ReferenceForTheAccountOwner >
  < SupplementaryDetails > EFGBGRAAXXXIRVTDEFXXXXN011458 < / SupplementaryDetails >
  < / F61 >
  < / F61a >
  < F62a >
  < F62M >
  < DCMark > D < / DCMark >
  < date > 131101 < / Date >
  < currency > EUR < / currency >
  < amount > 3736765,9 < / amount >
  < / F62M >
  < / F62a >
  < / MT970 >
  < / document >
  < / canton4 >
  < / FinMessage >

  Thank you

  Siva Prakash

  under query works for the 1 iteration. but for several games I get following error.

  When you want to present the groups repeating in relational format, you must extract the sequence of elements of the main XQuery expression.

  Each element is then spent the COLUMNS clause to be more shredded into columns.

  This should work as expected:

  Select x.*

  ABC t

  xmltable)

  XmlNamespaces)

  default 'urn:swift:xsd:fin.970.2011 '.

  , 'urn:swift:xsd:mtmsg.2011' as 'ns0 '.

  )

  , ' / ns0:FinMessage / ns0:Block4 / Document/MT970/F61a/F61 '

  in passing t.col1

  columns F61ValueDate Varchar (40) Path 'ValueDate '.

  , Path of the DebitCreditMark Varchar (40) "DebitCreditMark".

  , Varchar (40) path 'Amount' rise

  , Path TransactionType Varchar (40) "TransactionType".

  , Path of the IdentificationCode Varchar (40) "IdentificationCode".

  , Path of the ReferenceForTheAccountOwner Varchar (40) "ReferenceForTheAccountOwner".

  , Path of the SupplementaryDetails Varchar (40) "SupplementaryDetails".

  ) x ;

• Using the Singleton Pattern to keep the values of the previous variables?

  Is it possible using ExtendScript to retain the previous property, same value once it has been updated by the user? I know after effects update images expressions, but I believe that the values of script must be able to persist. This kind of thing is possible with ExtendScript?

  I think something like this should be achievable using a singleton as a model, but so far I've succumbed. Here's what I've tried so far:

  instance of the var;

  Check the value of the current instance

  Alert (GetInstance () .value);

  Check if the instance has a value, if this is not the case assign one, otherwise return the current value

  function getInstance() {}

  {if(!instance)}

  instance = createInstance();

  }

  return instance;

  } //End getInstance

  Create the new object with a value and return it

  function createInstance() {}

  var object = new Object (mySel.property("Effects") ("Transform") .property .property (1));

  Returns the object;

  } //End createInstance

  Or, if singletons are the wrong approach is there any type of storage mechanism that can be called in ExtendScript to write values?

  Thank you!

  I don't know (which means no there are not), but maybe your problem could be simplified.

  Your best chance would be to want to want to know if the property is changed at all, in which case you can use p.isModified.

  But if you want to know if it has been modified since the last change, then its a different story. Properties objects cannot be instantiated on their own, they are related to the actual properties in layers and cannot be "frozen".

  Brutal way:

  If the property is suspected of having a set of keys, you would be better of caching the stream of values in a table;

  Otherwise be cached keys (still many things to do... times, values, tweens) and the expression, but then comparing two States can be uncomfortable.

  .. for every p in your effect.

  I hope that you will get a better answer

  Xavier.

• Adapter DB of the poll as singleton process does not work as expected

  Poller DB adapater uses to control the transaction all the seconds to the downstream system and I want this poller as singleton process (an instance should be in working order at the same time).

  As suggested in the documents of the oracle, here are the settings that are configured in the composite.xml file.

  < name of service = "polling_Mange_Alert_Events."

  UI:wsdlLocation = "polling_Mange_Alert_Events.wsdl" > "

  " < interface.wsdl interface =" http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/Application1/int_app_manageAlerts/polling_Mange_Alert_Events#wsdl.interface(polling_Mange_Alert_Events_ptt) "/ > "

  < binding.jca config = "polling_Mange_Alert_Events_db.jca" >

  < property name = "singleton" > true < / property >

  < binding.jca >

  < name = "jca.retry.count property" type = "xs: int" much = 'false' override = "may" > 2147483647 < / property > "

  < name = "jca.retry.interval property" type = "xs: int" much = 'false' "

  Override = "may" > 1 < / property >

  < name = "jca.retry.backoff property" type = "xs: int" much = 'false' "

  Override = 'may' > 2 < / property >

  < name = "jca.retry.maxInterval property" type = "xs: String" much = 'false' "

  Override = "may" > 120 < / property >

  < / service >

  JCA file settings are:

  < name of the adapter-config = "polling_Mange_Alert_Events" = 'Database adapter' adapter wsdlLocation = "polling_Mange_Alert_Events.wsdl" xmlns =" " http://platform.integration.Oracle/blocks/adapter/FW/metadata ">

  < connection-factory location = ' ist/DB/vff-int-was"UIConnectionName ="PT_APPINFRA"adapterRef =" "/ >

  < endpoint-activation portType operation "polling_Mange_Alert_Events_ptt" = "receive" = >

  < className = "oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBActivationSpec activation-spec" >

  < property name = value = "polling_Mange_Alert_Events.ManageAlertEvents" / "DescriptorName" >

  < property name = "Nomrequete" value = "polling_Mange_Alert_EventsSelect" / >

  < property name = "MappingsMetaDataURL" value = "polling_Mange_Alert_Events - or - mappings.xml" / >

  < property name = "PollingStrategy" value = "LogicalDeletePollingStrategy" / >

  < property name = "MarkReadColumn" value = "TRANSACTION_STATUS" / >

  < property name = "MarkReadValue" value = "Treatment" / >

  < property name = "PollingInterval" value = "10" / >

  < property name = "MaxRaiseSize" value = "5" / >

  < property name = "MaxTransactionSize" value = "5" / >

  < property name = "NumberOfThreads" value = "1" / >

  < property name = "ReturnSingleResultSet" value = "false" / >

  < property name = "MarkUnreadValue" value = "pending" / >

  < / activation-spec >

  < / point endpoint-activation >

  < / adapter-config >

  This poller process runs on the environment in clusters (2 soa nodes) and it does not work as expected in the singleton process.

  Please advice to solve this problem?

  I think that, in this scenario, you must use the distributed polling in the DB adapter. You can select in the voting options in the DB adapter configuration wizard.

• Question about Singleton?

  Hello
  

  class A {
  private A a = new A();
  
    public static A getInstance(){
       return a;
    }
  
  }
  
  class A {
  
  private static volatile A _instance;
  
    public static A getInstance(){
  
    if(_instance == null){
    synchronized(A.class){
      if(_instance == null)
        _instance = new A();
      }
   }
  return _instance;
  }

  By two means we can achieve Singleton, can someone please explain the premiera having no disadvantage on the other?

  1. it is created even if nobody ever uses it.
  2. it is created during the time of load application, rather, when first used, which ensures a more bad user experience.