Distributed in-> centralized UM UM (unit 4.0.3)

Similar Questions

• BES 10 replacement for user defined rules of politics

  Our application for BES5 used the rules defined by the user to set default values for the application specific user.  From my reading, I can't find the equivalent of the user policy rules set in BES 10.

  Are there alternative ways to create, manage and distribute managed centrally by default for our application on the BES10.x.  By default include the HTTP port used by the application, the port of push and many faults of field level.

  Looking forward to you suggestions.

  Welcome on the support forums.

  It's a very good question. One that I have been unable to solve since the launch of BB10, unfortunately.
  I discussed the subject with the staff of BlackBerry of the Conference and the Forum (can't find jobs even though I think it was on the forum server, but who can not find as well...), but nothing helped.

  I tested several other ideas, such as the use of a configuration file attached to an e-mail with invocation etc, but for an application to the roll of 1000 users + these things are really not very good.
  I still work related to this free, if there is no possible solution, I would be interested.

• clean install of win 7 on intel ssd nvme 750

  I am trying to build a new processor and use a motherboard with bios update appropriate for nvme (ASUS Sabertooth) and a version of nvme 750 Intel SSD. I'll do a clean install on win7 system and do not know with certainty how (will install process, download the appropriate drivers) to get the necessary drivers. Just to be clear, I ask the correct question, for it will be a slot PCLe install. There may be other issues that I'm not aware of if I appreciate all entries

  Thanks in advance for your help

  On Sunday, July 12, 2015 18:32:52 + 0000, DANQUECA wrote:

  I am trying to build a new processor

  A word on terminology - an important point. You're not building
  a new processor. It is not possible. What you build is a new
  computer.

  "CPU" means "Central processing unit". In modern furniture
  computers, the CPU is a relatively small chip, one
  integrated circuit. It is on the motherboard inside the computer
  case. It is not the case itself, or the entire computer, which
  includes the case and what it contains.

  I don't know how incorrect practice began the appeal of the whole
  the "processor" of the computer, but here's my guess: when you buy a computer, you
  normally get the deal and what is in it, with a monitor,
  keyboard, mouse and perhaps a printer. All of these devices
  connect to the ports on the case. Because everything connects to the case,
  the case is "Central" to everything, and the term "Central."
  Processing unit"is sometimes badly understood and poorly applied to it.

  Yes, in this case, I understand what you mean even if you used
  the bad word. But depending on the situation, using the word
  wrong in the future, especially if you have questions, may
  confuse those who read your message and you get the wrong information.
  This is why it is important that you understand what is a CPU.

  and use a motherboard (ASUS Sabertooth) with suitable for nvme updated bios and a version of nvme 750 Intel SSD. I'll do a clean install on win7 system and do not know with certainty how (will install process, download the appropriate drivers) to get the necessary drivers.

  You should get the drivers on the web sites of the material
  Reference of the manufacturer - in this case, ASUS.

• Pushed a little CPU and now a blue tint

  I was vacuuming in the room where is my cpu and bumped slightly with the void and all of a sudden my monitor has developed a blue tinge.  Obviously, untouched.  I tried a few options to repair Windows, but they had me try to adjust my monitor, which I think is the problem.  Any ideas?

  Monday, June 8, 2015, 22:00:40 + 0000, Rick the librarian wrote:

  I was vacuuming in the room where is my cpu and bumped slightly with the void and all of a sudden my monitor has developed a blue tinge.  Obviously, untouched.  I tried a few options to repair Windows, but they had me try to adjust my monitor, which I think is the problem.  Any ideas?

  Apparently, you think that the term "CPU" is a synonym for "computer". It's
  not. A CPU and a computer are two very different things. The CPU is a
  small chip which is the case of your computer, on the motherboard.
  Yes, it's the most important chip in the computer, but it is not the
  the computer itself.

  "CPU" is in fact an abbreviation, not an acronym. "CPU" is synonymous with
  "Central processing unit". In modern personal computers, the CPU is a
  relatively small chip, an integrated circuit. It sits on
  the motherboard inside the computer case. It is not the case
  itself, it is not the total computer, which includes the case and
  all that it contains.

  I don't know how incorrect practice began the appeal of the whole
  the "processor" of the computer, but here's my guess: when you buy a computer, you
  normally get the deal and what is in it, with a monitor,
  keyboard, mouse and perhaps a printer. All of these devices
  connect to the ports on the case. Because everything connects to the case,
  the case is "Central" to everything, and the term "Central."
  Processing unit"is sometimes badly understood and poorly applied to it.

  So you might not have pushed the CPU. Please be careful
  not a misuse of the term, because if you do, you are likely to be confused
  those who try to help you and get the wrong answers.

  About your problem, my guess is that the cable from the monitor to
  the computer has loosened. Please make sure that it is connected tightly.

• Received a call of 'Microsoft Partner' £100 to fix the virus csrss.exe eager...

  I received a call from Aishaz Tech informing me, I got the "csrss.exe"virus and that they could solve the problem for me for £100, which is the cost of the "Microsoft Tools" necessary to solve the problem.  They said that I not able to repair myself, nor anyone else would have had none of these tools and they are a Microsoft partner.  I run MS Windows 7 Home Preimium.  I didn't even notice that I had a problem.  There is only one version of crss.exe in the running task manager (although I can't open the file location) and I have had no other problems such as unexpected POPs Windows that other people with this virus are complaining about.

  How can I know that this is not just a scam to get 100 pounds of me?
  How can I know that I even the virus?
  How do they know I have the virus and where they got my phone number from?
  Is it also true that not even reformat the HARD drive and reinstall all the software from scratch can solve the problem?

  They asked me to use "Teamviewer" free software to enable them to take on my screen, showing me the 'evidence' that I got the virus csrss.exe by:
  (1) running msconfig and showing me that much Microsoft services in the Service tab have the status 'arrested '.  They said all Microsoft services in the Service tab are essential and must always be running - is this true?
  (2) they ran regedit and viewd under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SAFETY record, for which the data column says (value not set) and told me that it meant my anti-virus did not work (I use AVG Free, who says he runs and certainly seems to be analyzes all incoming e-mails).  Nobody knows what the data column should be in it?
  (3) they then looked at what is called prefetch, showed me loads of entries with numbers and no names of recognizable program or file which said, contained the virus.
  4 BACK), they ran a tree, sending loads of country names and other information too fast to read the screen, followed a sentence saying your antivirus software is out of date or does not work and an urgent need to be updated.  But I keep my AVG anti-virus updated software automatically.
  I don't know what to do and I am really worried about what they could do with my computer while they were back online.  Someone at - it good suggestions please?

  I don't know if Microsoft would take interest because they have themselves identified (many claim come / working on behalf of Microsoft/Windows).

  Your main course would be your local trading standards office find a letter enough to follow through is going to be extremely lucky.

  The Police has a role through the Central cybercrime Police Unit (info here, puts it's national) Although the report must be done locally and the same COMPUTER literacy issue may arise as to Trading Standards. Perhaps mention the group could wake up a local Plod that they should actually do something, but that you have not paid what was then a crime took place?

  PS as you have no evidence as such a problem of recovery is far away still.

• Background in large organizations is a pain in the bu - could it be fixed?

  Hello.
  In our society, we have + 700 PC, many different sizes and screen resolutions.

  We distribute our Central Office IT.
  In the login script, however we cannot check for used screen resulution and push OK Office scope. Everyone will have the same image and it is then stretched to fit.

  The way I see it there are two possible solututions I was hoping someone could help me with.

  1. Writing scripts
     Is there a way to modify our script so that the screen resolution is enabled and the corresponding desktop image is chosen for distribution?
  2. New feature of Windows
     If Microsoft has created the opportunity to place an image in which is upper right. We could create a single image that would correct look (no stretch logo).

  My preference would be no. 1 because that would allow us to use the entire screen.

  Hi Henrik Notlev,.

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the link below.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itproinstall/threads

  Hope this information helps.

• He said paying $200 or your computer will be locked.now it won't get past "loading windows files" it goes to Administrator:cmd.exe

  He said paying $200 or we will lock your computer permanently

  He said paying $200 or we will lock your computer permanently

  One of the users of the Forum answers maintains that a great guide on information security is important for understanding 'ransomware' removal.  See the following compliments of Brian M - for suggestions on how to solve your problem: http://www.selectrealsecurity.com/remove-ransomware/

  And/or

  See: http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-removal/remove-police-central-e-crime-unit-reveton-ransomware

  General information on this type of scam malware can be found here: http://krebsonsecurity.com/tag/reveton/

  Good luck...

• Message-Driven beans and the order of the messages in the JMS queues.

  Hi all

  We use Weblogic 10.3.6 and we have a cluster with 2 JMS servers. In our project, it is important to process messages in the order when they arrive in the queues.

  Our question is simple enough, the fact that Message-Driven Beans (of the sort that take up messages in parallel) follow the order of the messages? Or do we need to configure something to do this.

  Thank you!

  According to the oracle documentation:

  With the help of unit-of-Order with Destinations spread

  As already mentioned in the Message of treatment according to the specification of JMS, Service of Message in Java specifications (to http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/jms/index.html ) doesn't guarantee no message ordered delivery when applications use distributed queues. WebLogic JMS redirects messages with the same disorder unit and have a target distributed to the same distributed destination member. The Member is chosen by unit of the order of the destination configuration:

  • By using the Service path
  • The hash-based routing using

  You can also

  If you distribute, you can use control unit andmax-beans-in-free-pool:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E23943_01/Web.1111/e13814/mdbtuning.htm#BABBEFCA

  More information here:

  Using Message unit-of-Order - 11g Release 1 (10.3.6)

  Tuning Message-Driven Beans - 11g Release 1 (10.3.6)

  WebLogic Server (WLS) JMS mapping control unit works with uniform distribution Destinations (Doc ID 1310795.1)

  Best regards

  Luz

• Design for MU - Exchange centralized, distributed to the unit question

  Here's the situation. Please let me know if I'm understanding correctly.

  Two centers of data, Europe and CONUS, centralized Exchange servers to support remote offices. Most remote sites in Europe have the average response time ~ 150ms, but AsiaPac is on the order of ~ 300ms.

  Each remote office would get a manager calls and a local system of the unit. The unity system would be storing voicemail in case of failure of the connection to the data center, give language-specific greetings, etc..

  If the link between the office and the data center is in place, then the machine of the unit will then send computers virtual to the Exchange Server, which would then put the virtual computer in box mailbox users.

  If the link does not work, it will store voicemails. Users will always be able to get new VM messages since they will be on their box of the local unit.

  Users will be able to listen to the old VM messages if they are configured to download e-mail on their local machine since at this time, it's just another email.

  I've been through the design guide and want to ensure that I understand that this is not a recommended solution? None of the offices have a local Exchange Server. The latency is going to be a deal breaker for a deployment of UNIFIED messaging?

  It would certainly not be a supported configuration. The unit must me on the same LAN as the server Exchange, MS, GC. Communication between Exchange and the unit is very sensitive to time and cannot tolerate delays or package loses all. Just me that you plan now flat will not work.

  So in this model, you will need to have the unit in the data center or choose a VM solution. With the servers in the data center, they would register in CM over the WAN, but you would need QoS are configured for voice traffic. But in the case where the Wan came down people would not be able to get to voicemail.

  The other option would be for you to have the CM and the unit in the data center and use SRST at remote sites:

  http://Forum.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd62348

  I know have enough details to know if it will work for you, but you can check it out.

  Thank you

  Keith

• The standardization of the distributed and unit-of-order ISSUE

  Hello
  
  I will in the following document and I have a few questions on this basis
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E17904_01/Web.1111/e13727/uoo.htm
  
  1.
  Based on the above, if a unit-of-order jms message is sent to a uniform distributed topic, Weblogic sends the message that one of the members of destination topic. Is it also correct to assume that messages will not be transmitted to other members of topic destination even if the redirection policy is set to "REPLICATED"?
  
  
  2.
  In addition, the document above (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/e13727/uoo.htm#i1041061) mentions a limitation when using uniform distributed QUEUE and unit-of-order with hash routing function. That is to say
  + "If a member of queues distributed has a unit-of-control partner and is inaccessible, the producer sends the message will throw a JMSOrderException and messages are not routed to other distributed queue members. +.
  
  However, the document does not mention what would be a behavior under the same scenario when using uniform distributed TOPIC (the use of hash-based routing)? will it be the same behavior with uniform SUBJECT distributed as well? Can you please clarify this
  
  
  3 Please refer to the section of the document http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/e13727/uoo.htm#i1044686, where it is said that + 'unit-of-Order messages are processed one at a time' +. This means that any operation batch parameter specified on the MDB (listening on the subject) will be ignored and that a message will be processed at a time?
  
  
  Kind regards
  Arif
  
  Published by: user602479 on January 11, 2012 12:15 AM

  I somehow implies that the behavior of publish/subscribe violates the contract PUA? In an RTD or a PDT, messages for the same AUP can of course be copied on multiple subscriptions. The ranking of the AUP of transformation within a given subscription is maintained.

  That said, there are only two cases where I remember off-the-top of my head that PUA command can easily be violated:

  -As you mentioned, no transactional section BMD in compatibility mode that max-beans-in free-pool greater than 1 more run in a thread pool with more than 1 thread available in the MDB. IIRC, compatibility mode is not supported with Stdp, this restriction does not apply to the Stdp. It's good to know you already noticed this in the docs.

  -Distributed queues that allow "transfer queue". I know it's documented too, but I don't remember where.

  I do not remember the existence of special restrictions on the use of PUA in combination with the PDT. Hash-based routing applies on the way of the shipment and has the same behavior on a like on a TDR or a UDQ TMP. Ditto for the track of basis of Routing Service.

  Kind regards

  Tom

  Published by: falls on January 11, 2012 17:29

• Central controllers or distributed?

  Hello

  I'm looking at a network for a company with about 20 branches, a HQ. At the present time, all sites depend on to wireless, and all use basic APs from Belkin, individually configured.

  I'd like something a little more robust, I'm looking at the possibility to evolve towards a basic system of controller.

  The branches each have about 10 people, with a large enough imprint on one floor, so most now have the Aps 2 or 3. They have no COMPUTER staff

  HQ obviously has personal COMPUTER and a mixture of offices and warehouse. Currently, it has about 5 APs.

  My question is, who is the best design to go to the current situation? A central controller capable of managing APs ~ 60 on all websites, or to each place, capable of managing 2 or 3 access points on this site?

  Also, how does the 1941W adapts to the situation of the controller, it has an integrated access point, but it can be used as a controller for the other LWAPs? We are in the process of redisgning fo the WAN too, so implementation of 1941ws would be an option, if it is reasonable.

  Cost is also an interesting factor, going to pay £50 per ap £300 will be interesting in itself, the cost in addition to this controller could break the proverbial camels back, so I need to be as economical as possible in this sense too.

  Thank you

  Anthony,

  Branches have it local resources to which they have access? What are the WAN links?

  My reccomendation in this scenario would be to deploy the controllers at the Center and configure access in mode H-REAP points so that they drop all traffic to the local switch. This minimizes the traffic that passes through the WAN links, also provides more control with respect to the quality of service and lowers the Comptroller general of the costs.  Recently, I have done this with a customer.

  I hope this helps. Please feel free to rate this post

• Distribute spacing. 125 "laps at. 13" also can not set the unit of pets

  In the align palette I choose 2 squares, set a key object, enter. 125 "and after clicking on return this rounds to. 13".

  Resembles a rounding problem, so thought I could change my prefs to points, enter "9 pt", but he's going to '. '. 13 ", will not remain in points.

  I measure the difference and was hoping to get. 125 ", but unfortunately get. 13.

  Illustrator and postscript are known for precision, so hoping that someone has a solution. And align to pixel grid is disabled.

  Mike, it seems to work correctly in CS6 when you do so:

  Choose window > align

  Choose to display the Options

  Select the objects.

  Choose align to key object

  Click on the key object

  Enter 0.125 to specify the spacing value

  Click the Horizontal distribute space.

  The result will be correct, although the field contains 0.13

  If you use the Tab key after entering 0.125, the field contains 0.13 and will use this value.

  The current CC2015 has the same behavior.

• vCloud vCAC Automation unit distributed Installation Architecture Center second device does not record services

  I work at the vCAC 6.0 installation in a distributed architecture for a production environment.  I have deployed the device of the identity, configuration Netscaler for balancing the load, configure external postgreSQL, followed vCloud Automation Center Documentation until you restart the vcac-server the vcac appliance second service and it never starts or registers the services on the second device vcac.

  The first aircraft arrives as it should and works through the just right load balancer.  After restarting the service vcac-server and 20 minute wait I can't to the second application directly bypassing the load balancer to access the page of the shell-ui-app.  Connect to the console of the second application I tail'ed the output of /var/log/vcac/catalina.out and used netstat - year to view the ports used.  Port 443 just never came up.

  I have filed a ticket with support but thought someone might have fallen on this and can help in the meantime.

  The problem has been resolved with the GA vCAC 6.1 version and using the HA tab for additional devices.

• How can I make my pdf able to distribute by e-mail by the end user - file now that central forms completed?

  I have a pdf file that worked well for us in central forms of the folder.  Now, without that service, I need to be able to have people take this pdf fillable saem and at the end of fill, submit to my email address.  How?

  Go to tools - form prepare and add a button field. Set the appearance options and the label then go to Actions, the mouse upwards and click 'submit form '.

  As the target URL, enter:

  mailto:[email protected]

  (replace the e-mail dummy by real to use, of course)

  That's good enough.

• Adobe Central forms will disappear in June. Can I still use "create a form" and "distribute form" after June?

  Last year, I used Adobe Acrobat to generate a registration form and used to collect inscriptions. Then I could download to Excel. This functionality will still be available once the central forms is stopped?

  Hi phyllis,.

  From June 23, 2015, you will not be able to create forms or collect data from existing forms.

  Best,

  Sara