DMVPN with VRF (redistribution a road by default via VRF)

Similar Questions

• iPsec S2S ASA to ASR with VRF using Lo's ADDRESS

  so, I have a solution and then a question about this solution:

  first the solution and the config for any guy in the future, who would need it:

  to configure the ASA VPN to the ASR:

  door-key crypto KEY-SITE-B-DC

  address [asr-ip-address]

  pre-shared key address [address-ip-ASA] key test123

  !

  Crypto ISAKMP-SITE-B-DC isakmp profile

  VRF VPN

  door KEY-SITE-B-DC

  identity function address [address-ip-ASA] 255.255.255.255

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 9

  BA aes

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  !

  card crypto VPN - S2S - address Loopback11

  Map 10 S2S - VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto

  Description # VPN S2S SITE-B-DC ASA #.

  defined by peer [ASA-ip-address]

  game of transformation-TRANS_SET-SITE-B-DC

  PFS group2 Set

  define the profile of isakmp ISAKMP-SITE-B-DC

  match address IPSEC-VPN-ACL_SITE-B-DC

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes - TRANS_SET-SITE-B-DC esp-sha-hmac

  tunnel mode

  !

  EXIT/ENTRY interface

  Description # BECAUSE RUN US DYNAMIC PROTOCOL BGP (in my case), no matter WHAT INTERFACE COULD BE THE If INPUT/OUTPUT, SO THESE IFs MUST ALSO HAVE THE CRYPTOMAP #.

  S2S - VPN crypto card

  !

  interface Loopback11

  Description # IPSEC TEST #.

  IP 255.255.255.255 [asr-ip-address]

  !

  !

  IPSEC-VPN-ACL_SITE-B-DC extended IP access list

  permit ip host [ASR-LAN-addresses] [ASA-LAN-addresses]

  !

  IP route vrf VPN [ASA-LAN-addresses] 255.255.255.x 8.8.8.8 global name GENERIC-IPSEC-CRYPTO-ROAD (ANYCAST) * the road here is for the traffic is encrypted, the next hop MUST be no recursive road *.

  !

  So now for my question:

  REALLY should be a route with a match on the other than a default route routing table?

  (because it does not work with a route that directs the default route, even when the recursive path pointing to the interface even spefic road made).

  is there any other way to do this? because to point the way to 8.8.8.8, means im my tunnels to be available on the availability of a course of 8.0.0.0 in the RIBS.

  help would be what enjoyed here guys!

  Why not let the router hide the complexity of administration using IPP?

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS-XML/iOS/sec_conn_vpnav/configuration/15-Mt/sec-Rev-RTE-inject.html#GUID-DEBFE993-16DF-4599-946A-1B7A42521C92

  The example is not perfect because of the connection point to point between two routers, but you can understand what IP address as the gateway.

  I suggest also entry of cryptographic cards, the new software. logical interfaces with tunnel protection is the way to go. The problem does not appear here.

• Windows 10. installed iTunes version 12.4.0.119. I have several iTunes libraries. On most of them display-> ' display as ' does not show the grid option. A library of fact.  It's all music, with no video media. By default seems to be a list that is unc

  Windows 10. installed iTunes version 12.4.0.119. I have several iTunes libraries. On most of them display-> ' display as ' does not show the grid option. A library of fact.  It's all music, with no video media. By default seems to be a list that is unchangeable.

  Select the sidebar if hidden. View options > view as may depend on which of the options for the song, artist, album, etc. are selected in the sidebar.

  TT2

• DMVPN with digital ceritificates and Hub acts as a CA server

  Hello guys,.

  is there anyway to configure the DMVPN with digital certificates and change the router Hub to act as a CA server?

  Thank you

  Yes, you can do it, go ahead and set up your router, Hub, with the normal DMVPN configuration so that it becomes the hub. After doing that follow the link below to add public key infrastructure server features:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t4/feature/guide/gt_ioscs.html

  And to register for the rays on the hub, use this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080210cdc.shtml

  Remember that regardless of the router Hub being the authority of CA, you must sign up for itself to allow the IKE PKI authentication.

• DMVPN and VRF Lite

  Someone at - it an example of use of several networks DMVPN and VRF (no MPLS) interfaces

  I have a requirment to use a common link to transmit three talking about networks isolated to the Hub as encrypted data. It could be VTI doesn't bother me, but I can't use MPLS.

  Thank you

  Hello

  "back in the day", I made this config:

  of http://isamology.blogspot.com/2010/01/IPSec-and-vrfs-so-who-faire-vrf.html

  But normally, I guess you've seen this:
  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6660/prod_white_paper0900aecd8034be03_ps6658_Products_White_Paper.html

  Same principles apply to the VRF lite little matter DMVPN/VTI/GREoIPsec configuration.

  tunnel vrf VRF door =

  IP vrf forwarding = inside the VRF

  Now, if you add the cheat of Nico (for isakmp profiles) sheet especially if necessary, you should be all set.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-13524

  Marcin

• DMVPN with dynamic failover HSRP/IPSEC

  "DMVPN with dynamic failover HSRP/IPSEC."

  Hi all. Is this possible? When you use a direct IPSEC LAN to LAN, you have a card encryption and when you secure the card encryption at the source of the tunnel interface, you configure "' crypto map redundancy with State '."

  The DMVPN does not use encryption card, sound by using an IPSEC profile with protection of tunnel. How you configure stateful with HSRP IPSEC in this situation?

  We're heading for a double cloud dmvpn topology with 2 heads dmvpn geographically separate. I want that every network head to have a redundancy HSRP, which can be done fairly easily. But I also want State IPSEC to be replicated for all security associations IPSEC do not fall in the case of a failover. Is it possible in this scenario and how?

  Thanks a lot as always.

  Hello again ;-)

  There are currently no plan at the moment (that I know) to mix with State redundancy and anythign with protection of tunnel.

  Frankly it is best to create redundancy in DMVPN termination on both turntable and relying on routing protocols - which I am sure you aware of so I won't bore you with details.

  That said, my personal observation is - if you want a failover go to ASA, when you have routers, you have all these wonderful tools like VTI/GRE for IPsec that mix well with routing protocols, and MUCH MUCH more. It is very often to change some timers for routing protocol driven "failover" happen very quickly.

  Marcin

• Why my iphone will have problems with pandora in synchronization with the pandora application on infotainment chevy via a usb connection?

  Why my iphone will have problems with pandora in synchronization with the pandora application on infotainment chevy via a usb connection?

  This was never resolved?  I have the same problem with an iphone 6s.  It is only my phone like an ipod playback.  I don't get the interface of Pandora.

• My Macbook 2012 mid pro with thunderbolt is connected to the tv via a Macally MDHDMI adapter.  Visuals are delivered as planned but no audio.  Can anyone suggest why no noise please?  And maybe a fix?  See you soon...

  My Macbook 2012 mid pro with thunderbolt is connected to the tv via a Macally MDHDMI adapter.  Visuals are delivered as planned but no audio.
  Can anyone suggest why no noise please?  And maybe a fix?
  See you soon...

  Have you checked system-> Sound-> output preferences to see if you can select the HDMI output?

• sign the document with 'Draw my signature' and send it via http-post

  Hello

  I have a pdf document with a signature field. When im opening with AcrobatReader XI, I can sign / Place Signature / draw my signature. I can't 'save a copy '. It works pretty well.

  Now, I place a button in the pdf document to be sent via http post to a given address. When I now open this PDF in the XI AcrobatReader, trying to sign. I can only do this with sign / Place Signature / use a certificate. But there is no way to "draw my signature."

  Did I miss an option to do this? Pls tell me if he has a chance to sign the document with 'Draw my signature' and send it via http-post.

  Or is this part of the concept? When I'm looking for a solution, I found EchoSign electronic signature.

  What is available depends on how the as is put in place. If you include a button with an action of type 'Submit form' and/or reader - enable the form, then e-signature (signature of drawing) will not be available in the player. If the document is compatible player then digitally signing will. So for what you want, do not Reader-enable the document and you can use the submitForm JavaScript method to submit. The site that has the JavaScript documentation was not available at the time I wrote this, but post again if you need help with that.

• Try to install lightning. Box tells me that I am trying to open a file and what should thunderbird to with him. It is by default in Thunderbird to open it. Why?

  Click Tools add on Lightening. 3.3.1 Flash appears and I click to add to Thunderbird. It downloads and a pop up box seems to say that you have chosen to open the lightning. Thunderbird has to do with this file. the options are open using default Thunderbird or save the file. Nothing to install, and if I click on open with thunderbird opens a new box for me to create a new message.

  I have nothing will install brightening.

  Can anyone help? Thank you

  Russ Kent

  https://support.Mozilla.org/en-us/KB/installing-lightning-Thunderbird

  Download addon for example: desktop
  In Thunderbird
  Tools > addons
  or
  Menu icon > Addons

  Click the gear icon and select "install the addon from file".
  Find and select the file that you downloaded and click 'open '.
  See the image

• Road by default from version 6.3 PIX IPsec tunnel

  We have a PIX 501 running IOS version 6.3.1.

  There are currently 3 tunnels IPsec active as described below.

  What we would like is to have all traffic by default (0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0) range out through the tunnel of the middle line so that traffic can be protected by a firewall on the other side of the tunnel.  Since ICF is a Sonicwall what would be needed to be changed in the configuration on the PIX to get there?

  Thank you

  6.3 (1) version PIX

  interface ethernet0 10baset

  interface ethernet1 100full

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  activate the 86AZXXmRLxfv/oUQ encrypted password

  86AZXXmRLxfv/oUQ encrypted passwd

  Site A hostname

  domain default.int

  clock timezone STD - 7

  fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol h323 h225 1720

  fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol they 389

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol sip udp 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol tftp 69

  names of

  name 75.75.75.2 CovadHub

  name 75.48.25.12 Sonicwall

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.3.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo response

  access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo

  access-list 102 permit ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 103 allow ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 104. allow ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.3.0 255.255.255.0

  pager lines 24

  opening of session

  monitor debug logging

  logging warnings put in buffered memory

  ICMP allow 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  external IP 75.25.14.2 255.255.255.0

  IP address inside 10.10.5.1 255.255.255.0

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  location of PDM 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  PDM logging 100 information

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  (Inside) NAT 0-list of access 101

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  allow icmp a conduit

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 75.25.14.1 1

  Timeout xlate 0:05:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225

  H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  NTP server 132.163.4.102 source outdoors

  NTP server 129.7.1.66 source outdoors

  Enable http server

  http 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  http 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  SNMP-Server Community public

  No trap to activate snmp Server

  enable floodguard

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac pix11

  peer11 card crypto ipsec-isakmp 10

  correspondence address 10 card crypto peer11 102

  peer11 card crypto 10 peers set 75.95.21.41

  peer11 card crypto 10 set transform-set pix11

  11 peer11 of ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  correspondence address 11 card crypto peer11 103

  11 peer11 peer Sonicwall crypto card game

  card crypto peer11 11 set transform-set pix11

  12 peer11 of ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  correspondence address 12 card crypto peer11 104

  card crypto peer11 12 set peer 75.62.58.28

  card crypto peer11 12 set transform-set pix11

  peer11 interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP key * address 75.62.58.28 netmask 255.255.255.240

  ISAKMP key * address netmask 255.255.255.224 Sonicwall

  ISAKMP key * address 75.95.21.41 netmask 255.255.255.252

  ISAKMP identity address

  ISAKMP keepalive 10

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 11

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 11

  ISAKMP policy 11 md5 hash

  11 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 11 28800

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 12

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 12

  ISAKMP policy 12 md5 hash

  12 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 12 36000

  Telnet 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  Telnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors

  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside

  SSH timeout 60

  Console timeout 0

  dhcpd address 10.10.5.70 - 10.10.5.101 inside

  dhcpd dns 10.10.1.214

  dhcpd rental 43200

  dhcpd ping_timeout 750

  dhcpd field default.int

  dhcpd outside auto_config

  dhcpd allow inside

  Terminal width 80

  Cryptochecksum:36d2c26afa8

  03957d 3659

  868d9219f8

  2

  : end

  Hello

  You do not configure really any type of default route for the VPN L2L. You match rather traffic with 'everything' destination on configuring VPN L2L. Basically you would like to configure the VPN L2L ACL encryption with the 'whole' destination map

  I guess in your case it would be the ACL named "103".

  access-list 103 allow ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 any

  IP 10.10.5.0 doesn't allow any access list 103 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0

  Naturally, your NAT0 ACL configuration should also reflect this change. I guess the end remote Sonicwall'd private NAT to public Internet access in this case whereas. I guess that in this case, the ACL NAT0 might even be just this one rule ACL

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0 any

  BUT what I was asking however for now mainly is the fact it has a priority of '11' in the 'crypto map' which has between 2 other L2L VPN connections.

  peer11 card crypto ipsec-isakmp 10

  correspondence address 10 card crypto peer11 102

  peer11 card crypto 10 peers set 75.95.21.41

  peer11 card crypto 10 set transform-set pix11

  11 peer11 of ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  correspondence address 11 card crypto peer11 103

  11 peer11 peer Sonicwall crypto card game

  card crypto peer11 11 set transform-set pix11

  12 peer11 of ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  correspondence address 12 card crypto peer11 104

  card crypto peer11 12 set peer 75.62.58.28

  card crypto peer11 12 set transform-set pix11

  If you have changed the destination address of '103' crypto VPN L2L ACL at "" I guess that would probably cause so that the last connection VPN L2L with "12" priority may stop working since the previous connection already corresponds to 'all' your network 'inside' destination address.

  The solution might be to delete the current configuration of the '11' priority and add it with '13' for example, so that the other 2 connections VPN L2L could continue to work and all the rest of the traffic would be passed to the connection VPN L2L with Sonicwall as the remote peer.

  No crypto map ipsec-isakmp 11 peer11

  no correspondence address 11 card crypto peer11 103

  no set of 11 peer11 card crypto don't peer Sonicwall

  No peer11 11 set transform-set pix11 crypto card

  13 peer11 of ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  correspondence address 13 card crypto peer11 103

  13 card crypto peer Sonicwall peer11 game

  card crypto peer11 13 pix11 transform-set game

  I have to say that this is how I expect it should work. I worked with VPN L2L that have been configured in this way but its quite rare.

  If you want to try something like that, of course, be ready to return to the old configuration with your admins of the remote peer, if things do not work. I guess more difficult configurations changes must be made on the remote end while your configuration of the ends should be fairly simple.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• Road of default remote access VPN session

  ASA version 8.2.2

  How do you assign remote access VPN sessions a single default route?  Other than the default route assigned to ASA.  For example, my VPN ASA (handles vpn sessions), defaults to the Internet.  I wish that sessions VPN for remote access by default internal network first, then follow the default route to the Internet on another firewall.

  The SAA outside the IP address of the interface is a public.  Inside is a private 10.x.x.x.  VPN clients receive 172.17.x.x.

  Thank you

  After the command 'road' added keyword "tunnel".

  in the tunnel

  Specifies the route as the default gateway of tunnel for the VPN traffic.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/command/reference/QR.html#wp1767323

• DMVPN with 2 Hubs

  (1) if I understand correctly - Phase 1 DMVPN is Star technology. Is it possible to use two hubs of the network?

  (2) is it possible to use the router 1841 as Phase 1 DMVPN hub?

  (3) imagine this network topology:

  * PIX *-(static vpn tunnel)-> router 1841 (hub)-(dynamic vpn tunnel)-> rays.

  I'm having problems with routing in VPN between PIX and rays through 1841?

  In the attachment, see diagram.

  Thnx in advance!

  Hello

  It should be possible. The tunnel between the PIX and Hub 2 is going to be a regular with PIX IPSEC tunnel configured with all networks to talk as destination the ACL crypto and vice versa on the hub. Hub 2 will have a static route for the private subnet route tis and PIX will be redestributed in the routing process so that it is announced to the rays. Please keep in mind that the protection tunnel profile you are configuring should have configured 'shared' keyword.

  HTH,

  Please rate if this can help.

  Kind regards

  Kamal

• DMVPN with invalid SPI recovery / DPD

  Dear Experts,

  I'm evaluating a networks of average design company DMVPN Phase 2 scope, trying to optimize the time of receovery after a failure and restoration of a DMVPN counterpart.

  1. I just spent through a PDF of Cisco Live at a workshop of 2011 named "Advanced Concepts of DMVPN - BRK 4052".

  It is said (without further explanation) that the invalid SPI recovery feature is not useful with DMVPN.

  Can anyone explain, why?

  2 DMVPN involves the use of the Tunnel (TP) Protection. I read the reviews that say that you can not use Dead Peer Detection (DPD) as well as the TP.

  Unlike these reviews, Cisco DMVPN V1.1 design guide recommends a configuration container:

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10

  That means, I have to use DPD, but without "periodicals" KeepAlive? If so, could you explain?

  Thank you very much!

  Dear Sebastian,

  1 SPI recovery means essentially that the answering router must meet the same initiator VPN router if the SPI was invalid, the response of the intervener would be an 'invalid' error to the initiator VPN.

  Why it is not recommended for DMVPN?

  Well, according to the previous description of SPI, imagine if someone upsets your router with rogue applications! with the resumption of active SPI, it means that your router would need to respond to all messages which he received with the message "Invalid Error", which basically means--> attack (Denial of Service Attack) back--> high CPU processing on your router.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t2/feature/guide/gt_ispir.html#wp1045200

  How is it that relates to DMVPN?

  Well! DMVPN is mainly deployed with large number of rays! and even if no one attacks you! your rays can attack you

  2. I don't think that having periodic KeepAlive is what we hear in the comments on demand or periodic KeepAlive is not really effect DMVPN.

  I don't know what are the comments you've read, but I think you can use DPD! There have been some incompatabilites filed for tunnel KeepAlive, but as far as I know, nothing major was filed against ISAKMP KeepAlive.

  HTH!

  AMatahen

• Migration phase 3 DMVPN with Central Hub

  I'm looking at the migration of my network DMVPN phase 2 phase 3. The current system contains 3 regional poles each serving about 100 rays. The final goal is to be able to build tunnels speaks to talk between sites that are hosted to the hubs in different regions. I understand from reading the document "Migrating from Dynamic Multipoint VPN Phase 2 phase 3" regional poles of phase 3 can be related in a hierarchy through a central hub, but there are no details in the doc and I was not able to find a white paper that addresses this specifically. Someone at - it experience with this topology or have the material regarding the deployment and configuration of nodal point?

  Kind regards

  Mike

  Mike,

  DMVPN phase 3 is still a valid design choice, even if we are heading for FlexVPN/IKEv2 combo (eventually finished on ASRs)

  That being said, the deployment is quite easy:

  -Shortcuts PNDH (+ redirect PNDH, really unnecessary during stable operation) on the shelves

  -Redirect PNDH on the hubs.

  Generally on regional hubs you would have a tunnel interface to the rays and the other (like talking) tunnel to the global hubs, remember that they must belong to the same network PNDH (i.e. same id PNDH network).

  Now according to your choice Routing Protocol (BGP dimensionnera better, obviously), it's just a matter of right summarized advertising and setting the delays and costs.

  The top level I know, if you want to read, google "BRKSEC DMVPN" you will find some different item of Cisco Live/Networkes of the past - my resource of choice.

  M.