Easy VPN with the Tunnel Interface virtual IPSec dynamic

Similar Questions

• Any camera regardless of the interface is available for use with the LabView interface.

  Hello

  I intend to go for some CMOS camera,

  but I have a huge doubt before buying, the camera of menttioned above is not anywhere in this list. Nor can I see any type being supported USB device.

  The question is

  1. is a camera regardless of the interface is available for use with the LabView interface?
  2. Can I build a VI to communicate with any device image and recording of camera and take the data?

  Any kind of help or advice is greatly appreciated... I have to buy a CMOS camera and begin to run.

  Thank you...

  Hello Virginia,.

  I am pleased that this information has been useful, one thing I wanted to mention is that USB 3.0 has its own standard USB 3.0 Vision which is currently not supported. If this camera is also Direct Show compatible then you will be able to acquire an image using IMAQdx and manipulate all the attributes that are published to the API Live Show.

  I hope that USB 3.0 Vision will be supported in the near future, and we tentatively announced for this standard of communication for the August 2013 Vision Acquisition Softwareupdate.

  See you soon,.

  -Joel

• TCP on PC server with the network interface has 2

  If I need to create a TCP on PC server with the network interface has 2 with a different IP address, for example 192... and 172... and the IP address of the client side is 192..., is there something I need to take care.

  Any suggestion, thank you.

  No, by default the server listens on all interfaces.

• Interact with the user interface components

  I'm trying to find a GOOD way to interact with the external classes user interface components. For example, that you have a 'controller' class that needs to access the view of the user interface in some way (define a label text or something else). The controller class does not do anything, it discusses only the logic of what should be the case. Currently, it is created by my top-level class when the program starts. He listens to some events occur and needs to update/interact with the user interface or the State of the application depending on what events are. I do not seem to be a way for this controller class to easily access the UI component that I need to get my hands on.
  
  I'm trying to do to reduce the size of a file of mxml WindowedApplication growing (LOOK cool but that is not important) and take part of the logic of the application of this file.
  
  It's complicated by the fact that the label is in a State that does not have the status of 'base' (so it is not a child, or even a subsidiary child of the main class at boot time) and by the fact that it is not yet near a high school component. (If that were the case, I could probably just pass the label object in the constructor for the outdoor classroom.)
  
  In other words, I can't just call getChild ("labelName") on my 'main' request object because it is buried nested inside OTHER components. I don't think I like the idea to browse all components and sous-composants recursively looking for the component that my outer class trying to ask. I thought about other ideas, but I don't like any of them enough to try them, eh.
  
  I'm at the point now about where I come to the conclusion that my fundamental design strategy is wrong, or Flex just not allowing complex applications where the GUI components can interact with external classes relatively pain-free. I'm not convinced that "Flex cannot do', I'm looking for advice on some great Flex application in all design patterns.
  
  Where do you put this kind of control logic, and what happens when it starts to overflow and become so large that you need to break in other files?

  Found a solution, I think that's what I've been looking for:

  http://labs.Adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Cairngorm

• Easy VPN with IPSec VPN L2L (Site - to - Site) in the same ASA 5505

  Hi Experts,

  We have an ASA 5505 in our environment, and currently two IPSec VPN L2L tunnels are established. But we intend to connect with VPN (Network Extension Mode) easy to another site as a customer. Is it possible to configure easy VPN configurations by keeping the currently active IPSec L2L VPN(Site-to-Site) tunnels? If not possible is there any work around?

  Here's the warning we get then tried to configure the easy VPN Client.

  NOCMEFW1 (config) # vpnclient enable

  * Delete "nat (inside) 0 S2S - VPN"

  * Detach crypto card attached to the outside interface

  * Remove the tunnel groups defined by the user

  * Remove the manual configuration of ISA policies

  CONFLICT of CONFIG: Configuration that would prevent the Cisco Easy VPN Remo success

  you

  operation was detected and listed above. Please solve the

  above a configuration and re - activate.

  Thanks and greetings

  ANUP sisi

  "Dynamic crypto map must be installed on the server device.

  Yes, dynamic crypto is configured on the EasyVPN server.

  Thank you

• IPSEC VPN on the Ethernet Interface

  Hello

  I have a doubt on a new fundamental concept.

  If IPSEC VPN works on Ethernet Interface of router Cisco? It's IPSEC VPN can be terminated on FastEthernet Interface of the router?

  So far, I worked with Serial Interface only.

  R.B.KUMAR

  Yes it can - see the sample config below: -.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094525.shtml

• Problem with the Site to Site IPSec VPN using ADSL and PPPoE

  I have an IPSec site to Site VPN between a 2805 and an 1841. Both have fixed IP, but the end of 1841 uses a PPPoE and ADSL connection. The MTU that is displayed on the Dialer0 interface is 1454.

  I can get the packets through the Tunnel without problem (standard pings), but don't spend larger packages.

  Any suggestions?

  You can apply on both. Here's a URL that explain the problem of MTU and option in detail.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk827/tk369/technologies_white_paper09186a00800d6979.shtml

  Kind regards

  Arul

  * Please Note If this can help *.

• Cisco ASA 5510 L2L VPN on the backup interface

  OK, here is what I have and I even if I knew how to do this, but it has not worked for me.  I hope someone out there can help you.

  I have an ASA 5510 running 8.4 with double configuration of ISPs on 2 different interfaces: outside (primary), backup (backup).  I also have a site to site VPN ASA another in another city.  The VPN is now configured on the external interface and works very well.  What I wanted to do, is to make the VPN running on backup interface only.

  So, I changed the card encryption on the remote side to use the backup interface IP and created a tunnel-group for her.  Then, I created a map encryption for backup interface and activated ikev1 on it.  The default route is configured to use the external interface, so I created a static route that routes traffic destined for the external interface of the remote side to the backup interface default gateway.  I can get to establish tunnels, but no traffic passes through them.  I have however while I need a NAT device for the tunnel traffic to I created a NAT so but still no transmitted traffic.  I tried the packet - trace and he said: the traffic was allowed and show its crypto ipsec command, I see the configuration of the tunnel, but no traffic will pass through it.  Can anyone help?

  Ben,

  you use a code to version 8.4, I recommend starting by removing the config NAT statements at both ends. This version does not have the NAT and control, and if you don't need... I've seen instances with 8.4 (3) where a NAT even though apparently correct was causing not to pass through the traffic.

  Site A:

  NAT (inside, backup) source static obj-SiteALAN obj-SiteALAN static obj-SiteBLAN obj-SiteBLAN

  Site b:

  NAT (inside, outside) source static obj - 192.168.5.0 obj - 192.168.5.0 destination static obj - 192.168.3.0 obj - 192.168.3.0

  If possible, you should increase your AES encryption, but this is a personal point of view and should not stop the traffic through the links. You should be able to see the counters for the data transmitted / received are these incrementing?

  Do you have the ACLs that are from the inside to the outside and internal interface to the Interface of backup (duplicated.

  In this model, the control is the routing.

  Best regards

  Ju

  http://helpamunky.WordPress.com/

• Easy VPN with LDAP integration

  Hello!

  Currently I have an EASY VPN server on a Cisco 2911 with LDAP integration to authenticate the user.

  Everything works well except for one aspect. When you try to connect to the VPN (IPSec Client), the user is prompted for the credentials that are in this case their domain credentials. When the user places the identification information is immediately invite you for it again and again for about 1 minute. Then their and the VPN is in place.

  When I check the logs, I can't see him connect LDAP ranging down to connect to to the top.

  My question is if there is a way to make the LDAP connection, stand or accelerate this process.

  Thoughts?

  Jason,

  I had a long discussion with BU some time previously, if the LDAP protocol is in fact a taken AAA mechanism supported with ezvpn.

  To which (at the time) they said 'no '.

  We have therefore tabled a documentation bug:

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId= CSCud35798

  (which has not yet been resolved).

  If it is in fact always a limiting factor, I suggest contacting your system engineer or open evidence of the TAC, so we can check with BU.

  M.

• Problems with the web interface of connection vcenter 5.1

  Guys,

  What don't understand me, I've set up a new virtual appliance version of vcenter test 5.1, I can connect just fine using vsphere client and console, but the web interface refuses to agree with the same identifiers. What is happening with this single sign? I really do not understand.

  You guys could help me please?

  I stumbled upon this same question.  5.1 with the search service is completely different than 5.0, this is why the others are not working.

  Here's what I did to solve the problem.  I turned on the regeneration of SSL certificate:

  1. Navigate to https://[IP]: 5480 and connect
  2. Go to the Admin tab and press the button "Toggle the setting of certification" until activated regeneration 'certificate' displays Yes
  3. Go to the network tab and change the host name.  This will trigger a regeneration of SSL (or you can change the ip address).  I don't know if change 'localhost' to something else helped, but it can't hurt.
  4. Restart the box (restart System tab button.)

  At this point, you can look at the start-up of the machine of vcenter console messages.  You will notice some messages about detection of a new hostname or IP and regenerate a new certificate.  You will see all the services to import it again SSL ceritifcates so.

  At the end of the reset, I was able to connect to the web client to vCenter!

  HTH

• I am often unable to enter text with the physical or virtual keyboard, making research and impossible connections in Firefox, forcing me to use Chrome. What to do

  Use Google Nexus 9 with the latest Android. Since one of the recent os updates the keyboard sometimes fails to appear when I enter a text box on a page while using Firefox. This makes research and connections-impossible. Bluetooth virtual and physical keyboards fail to register. It is intermittent. Visit the same page in Chrome has no problem, but I want to continue with Firefox. Please let know us, if I can't fix this I'll have to give up Firefox. Shame!

  Hi Rijumati,
  I understand that there are some forms on a few Web sites that does not load a keyboard to enter data in this text field. I'm happy to help you.

  For the test, can you please give an example where that happens?
  Also this happens with the default keyboard or another has been added?

• Low cost intelligent or managed switch with the console interface

  Could someone recommend more low switch cost smart or managed with the interface of the console?

  I only need 4 ports but need to control CLI, telnet, or SSH.

  no downtime

• Compilation of Simulink with the model interface toolkit (MIT)

  Hello

  I am considering using the template Toolkit Interface to Simulink model in the LabVIEW environment. My question is about the process of compiling Simulink. To correctly compile the Simulink model in a DLL and then wrap it with the API from MIT the build process should take place on a machine that has the two LabVIEW Matlab/Simulink AND with MIT?

  Which means, is it possible to have Matlab/Simulink, on a single machine (typewriter), a license to some developers (devA) and on another machine (machine B) has a license of LabVIEW, a license to another developer (devB). Portion of the CAN the LV at MIT be installed on computer B and part of Simulink at MIT be installed on the machine as the developer can compile the simulink model in a DLL and then pass to developer B to then wrap it in LabVIEW? Or is the string of tools such as Matlab/Simulink and LabVIEW must be on the same machine. That means, a developer must have these two licenses?

  Thank you!

  This help document can help you get started with the compilation of a model for use on a target of cRIO VxWorks. You don't need to have your target available for the compilation model, or write your application to MIT. You only need the target to deploy and run the model (obviously).

  As described in the help link, you will need to download a compiler appropriate for the compilation of the VxWorks model. A free version of the GCC is linked to this document that you can download. You will need this compiler and the framework subcomponent model of MIT to compile the templates.

• Static and VPN on the external interface

  Hello

  Can someone tell me if it is possible (and if so, how) do vpn enabled on the external interface and to have something like:

  public static x.x.x.x interface (indoor, outdoor)

  IE: I have two addresses ip - one for the router an e0 on the pix. I create a static and lists of access to allow inbound http/https server inside but I also want to allow vpn hit e0 and work. My configs work if I use an ip address 3 for the static, but not if they share. I can imagine that the static method takes the vpn traffic before the pix can use it OR maybe as the pix has no route to the now (due to the static method) that it cannot answer?

  Hope I'm making sense

  Thanks for the time spent on this

  see you soon

  Andy

  I think you want something like this:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface http 10.10.10.10 http netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 (where 10.10.10.10 is your web server)

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface https 10.10.10.10 https netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.x.x eq 80 (where x.x.x.x is your IP interface)

  access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.x.x eq 443

  Access-group 101 in external interface

  It will be useful.

  Steve

• Telnet on PIX with the external interface

  Is there a way to telnet in PIX Firewall through the external interface?

  SSH is a valid method to access the site, but I wonder if there is another way to do it. PDM is another tool for access and modification of the configuration.

  Any help will be useful.

  Best wishes

  Onur

  I'm pretty sure that Telent directly to the external interface of a PIX is not available. It is such a big security risk that it is not offered as an option.

  SSH is a much better way to go (even if it's only SSH1).

  You can probably VPN in your network and Telnet from inside.

  Good luck

  Scott