Error calling operation, working business rule

Similar Questions

• Error during migration of business rules

  While trying to use the import/export option in environmental assessments to migrate business rules, we encountered an error.
  The export went very well. When you try to import, it says this: (even if it allows me to select the xml file suitable for import)
  Error during migration of business rules.
  Detail: The import file specified is not a valid trade rules xml file. Import ends.
  Details: Exception occurred. Please check your log file for more details.
  
  I'm sure I used the inherent format to export business rules.
  The old and new systems are version 11.1.2.
  
  The LCM method has failed also to the migration of business rules.
  Any suggetions?
  Thank you
  Elkaïm

  When you export make them sure you don't have "For Calc Mgr" checked, if you then import with failure.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Error calling operation "DatabaseAdapterSelect".

  Hi, am having the following fault in Jdev 11 g:
  
  Error calling operation 'DatabaseAdapterSelect' the provider 'DatabaseAdapter '.
  12345 exception occurred when the link was invoked. Exception occurred during invocation of the JCA binding: "JCA binding run operations reference 'DatabaseAdapterSelect' have to: connection problem component binding JCA.". JCA Binding component is unable to create an outgoing connection of JCA (CCI). Project1:DatabaseAdapter [DatabaseAdapter_ptt::DatabaseAdapterSelect (DatabaseAdapterSelect_inputParameters, EmployeeCollection)]: The JCA Binding component could not establish an outbound connection of JCA CCI due to the following problem: BINDING. Error of JCA - 12510 JCA adapter localization resources. Cannot find the adapter in JCA resources via the element of the binding .jca file <-factory connections / > The JCA Binding component is unable to startup of the resource adapter that is specified in the <-factory connections / > element: location = ' EI/DB/MyDb '. The reason is most likely that 1) the resource adapter RAR file has not been deployed successfully to the application server WebLogic or 2) the element '< jndi name >' in weblogic - ra.xml has not been set to eis/DB/MyDb. In the latter case, you need to add a new factory of connections from WebLogic JCA (deploy a RAR). If please fix this and then restart the application server". The called JCA adapter threw an exception of resource. Please review the error message above carefully to determine a resolution. Location of JCA resource adapter error. Cannot find the adapter in JCA resources via the element of the binding .jca file <-factory connections / > The JCA Binding component is unable to startup of the resource adapter that is specified in the <-factory connections / > element: location = ' EI/DB/MyDb '. The reason is most likely that 1) the resource adapter RAR file has not been deployed successfully to the application server WebLogic or 2) the element '< jndi name >' in weblogic - ra.xml has not been set to eis/DB/MyDb. In the latter case, you need to add a new factory of connections from WebLogic JCA (deploy a RAR). Please fix this and then restart the application server null
  
  I am facing this problem when I run/test my POC.
  He said something like "* JCA binding run operations reference 'DatabaseAdapterSelect' has no reason of: JCA Binding component connection issue.*.
  
  How can I solve this problem?

  I found this link to be helpful pls use it.
  http://www.packtpub.com/article/installation-configuration-Oracle-SOA-Suite-11g-1?utm_source=rk_oracle11gr1_abr3_1009&utm_medium=content&utm_campaign=ramsai

• Error opening of AAS business rule

  Hello
  
  I'm unable to open console ASA business associated with one of the planning rules / Essbase application. This particular planning application is also not appear when I try to "select Preview ' for the business rule. The rules of business for this particular application are works good planning of a web application.
  
  
  Error recovery planning request app_name on server servername.
  Details: Exception occurred. Please check your log file for more details.
  
  hbrserver.log randomly shows one of the following two errors:
  2010-06-15 16:02:56, 469 [ACTIVE] WARN ExecuteThread: '1' for the queue: com.hyperion.hbr.plugin.planning.PlanningMetadata "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default" - error recovery planning request app_name on server servername.
  
  or
  
  2010-06-15 15:28:22, 094 [ACTIVE] WARN ExecuteThread: '0' for the queue: com.hyperion.hbr.plugin.planning.PlanningMetadata '(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default' - Impossible to recover root element connected to planning/server_name/app_name/database_name
  
  
  There is no problem with the other rules of business that are associated with other applications.
  
  
  I tried to restart the Regional but that does not solve the issue. Furthermore, I believe that this problem came after I manually deployed 64 bit weblogic for EAS. On other environments where tomcat is used there is no problem at all.
  
  
  Thanks in advance.

  I assume you've tried the standard process of: -.
  Stop planning, EAS, RMI services.
  Start planning of RMI, EAS,
  Connect to the planning through the web application.
  Connect to EAS, open your rule.

  Also you can create a new rule for the planning application after following the process described above?

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Error using EXCLUDE in business rules

  I've been able to use EXCLUDE successfully in calc scripts, but not in business rules. When I copy the Calc Script code containing an EXCLUSION (see below) to a business rule, I get the following error:
  
  FIX (@IDESCENDANTS ("TIP_10"))
  EXCLUDE("1040080")
  "10RF1310" = "RF_Cum_Temp" * "FY_Rate"-> "7RF30000";
  "10RF1320" = "RF_Cum_Temp" * "PY_Rate"-> "7RF30000";
  ENDEXCLUDE;
  ENDFIX;
  
  Meeting ") ' at line 25, column 18.
  Expected one of:
  "::" ...
  ":" ...
  "->" ...
  "=" ...
  < MULOP >...
  "+" ...
  "-" ...
  < RELOP >...
  < EQOP >...
  "AND"...
  "GOLD"...
  ";" ...
  
  When I remove EXCLUDE it, it works. I hate having to chop my Calc in order to bring them into the rules of the company, but this seems the only alternative. We use Essbase version 9.3.1. I noticed someone in the forums had the same question, but never received an answer as to if it is a 9.3.1 limitation, etc. Here is the original post: EXCLUDE... ENDEXCLUDE in business rules
  
  Thanks for any help!

  @LIST is just a way to create a game of a series of individually selected members who do not have a hierarchical relationship of members. You can use it in a large number of functions.

  The game to the right of the decimal point in the @REMOVE must be a member - member set can be a function, say @CHILDREN or so cherry picked, @LIST.

  I still consider @REMOVE as a superset and together, including the value of superset.

  So for your code, I think it would be something like:
  Fix (@Remove (@LIST, @descendants (MemberName) (mn1, mn2, mn3, mn4, etc..)))

  I think that the combination of @DESCENDANTS and @REMOVE behave as EXCLUDE.

  By the way, I try to make these corrections on the members of level 0 and then roll as it affects fewer blocks of data and then roll up the numbers. It is almost always more rapid, but may not work for you.

  Kind regards

  Cameron Lackpour

• Validation error in calculation Manager business rule (@_AT)?

  I've migrated a 11.1.1.3 business rule and both macros (models) in the calculation Manager 11.1.2.2. When I validate the script I get the following error. Everyone has seen this before or have any advice? Script syntax checks ok.

  "An error occurred in: rule: FCO_3YrBud_DGAlloc error: formula [statement of DIFFICULTY] (line 24) parse error: expected [()] found [@_AT]" after the function name rule FCO_3YrBud_DGAlloc ".

  Line 24 is the first declaration of FIX in the script below show:

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  Model of % (name: = "FCOm_TargetSection", ask: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', PDT: = ("parm1": = ([["three year Budget"]]), "parm2": = ([["DGAllocation"]]), "parm3":=([[{FCOrtpYears}]]),"parm4":=([[Mar]])))))

  Model of % (name: = "FCOm_TargetAgg", ask: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', PDT: = ("parm1": = ([["three year Budget"]]), "parm2": = ([["DGAllocation"]]), "parm3":=([[{FCOrtpYears}]]),"parm4":=([[Mar]])))))

  First model:

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  /****************************************************************************************************************

  FCOm_TargetSection

  parm1 = scenario

  PARM2 = version

  parm3 = years

  parm4 = periods

  The purpose of this macro is to translate GBP target and copy in the Curr entry and aggreggated. Step 1: Copy the total Section entry to I / P Total Section and no step 1 project: copy converted into money - no need to translate entries all entries are in GBP step 2: copy entry GBP to Curr NA values

  *****************************************************************************************************************/

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Curr NA", "basic", 'Entry in the currency', ' one - 6111 "," A - 6112 ',' A - 6113 ', ' a - 65 ',' A - 66 ',' A - 620905 ')

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'Input_Total Section;

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'no project ';

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), 'Curr NA', 'Total Section', Section 'Input_Total', 'No project', ' base', ' a - 6111 "," A - 6112 ',' A - 6113 ',' A - 65 ',' A - 66 ',' A - 620905 ')

  DATACOPY 'entered currency' to 'convert currency (GBP);

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Total area", 'Input_Total', 'No project' Section, "basic", 'Entered in the currency ", converted into currency (GBP)', ' a - 6111", "A - 6112 ',' A - 6113 ',' a - 65 ',' A - 66 ',' A - 620905 ')

  DATACOPY "Curr NA ' to 'entry GBP;

  ENDFIX

  Second model:

  /****************************************************************************************************************

  FCOm_TargetAgg

  parm1 = scenario

  PARM2 = version

  parm3 = years

  parm4 = periods

  The purpose of this macro is to target data aggreggate Step2: aggregate data

  *****************************************************************************************************************/

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), "basic", "Entered in the currency ',' converted to currency (GBP)")

  CALC DIM ("account", "BudgetHolder", "Admission tickets", "SectionProjects");

  ENDFIX

  In fact

  I just re thinking about your message. My comments above is not correct for your situation. The syntax above is correct if you are talking about the code 'in' the model itself (so if you open the template and look at the code). But if the code you have posted in your messages made from the window of script of the rule (in script view) then your problem is something different potentially.

  So the first thing is to make sure that in the model itself (open model), the PDT is defined in the global range or range of Member as [Parm1], [Parm2] etc. (or difficulty, depends on the way the model is shown) as I said in my first reply above, the model only defines the DTP, not members and must be placed between square brackets , as [Parm1}. Who will make that the DTP as defined in your model correctly. Then we need to look at how you define these PDT in the rule itself. Normally, it is much easier if your rule is in the chart view, as you just click on the model and you can enter the values. As you have your rule in Script mode, you must be very careful about how you set the values of the PAO. Every DTP 'type' has a different syntax in script mode.

  Looking at your script again I see another problem potentially. When you set the values in the DTP, the value must locking with double brackets, so [['three year Budget"]]. In your script, you must also in brackets. That is not always correct. There are moments between brackets and double square brackets is correct, but it is only when your DTP is of type 'Members', and by default, according to me, old macros of business rule translates into templates with the "Script" DTP types

  So, if you also change your business section where the models are defined as below; (as you can see, without parentheses around the DTP values).

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  Model % (name: = "FCOm_TargetSection", application: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', dtps:=("parm1":=[["Three_Year_Budget"]],"parm2":=[["DGAllocation"]],"parm3":=[[{FCOrtpYears}]],"parm4":=[[Mar]]))))

  Model % (name: = "FCOm_TargetAgg", application: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', dtps:=("parm1":=[["Three_Year_Budget"]],"parm2":=[["DGAllocation"]],"parm3":=[[{FCOrtpYears}]],"parm4":=[[Mar]]))))

  The end of the game should be that when you open your rule and the view script and script tab then select low bottom your models should look as below, as you can see, everything that needs to be included in the script are the values substituted for the definition of the model, the key point is that there are no brackets or parentheses. The script should show script "pure". (I have highlighted and underlined how these 4 PDT should result in script mode)

  First model:

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  /****************************************************************************************************************

  FCOm_TargetSection

  parm1 = scenario

  PARM2 = version

  parm3 = years

  parm4 = periods

  The purpose of this macro is to translate the target entry to GBP and copy of Curr NA and associate. Step 1: Copy the total Section entry to I / P Total Section and no step 1 project: copy converted into money - no need to translate entries all entries are in GBP step 2: copy entry GBP to Curr NA values

  *****************************************************************************************************************/

  DIFFICULTY ('Three-year Budget', 'DGAlocation', FY15, Mar, @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Curr NA", "basic", 'Seized currency', '-6111 ", '-6112", "has - 6113", "A - 65", "A - 66", "-620905")

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'Input_Total Section;

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'no project ';

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY ('Three-year Budget', 'DGAlocation', FY15, Mar, @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Curr NA', 'Total Section', Section 'Input_Total', 'No project', 'basic', '-6111", '-6112 "," has - 6113 "," A - 65 "," A - 66 ","-620905 ")

  DATACOPY 'entered currency' to 'convert currency (GBP);

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY (FY15, Mar, 'DGAlocation' and 'Three-year Budget', @IDESCENDANTS("BH-T"), 'Total Section', Section 'Input_Total', 'No project', 'basic', 'Entered in the currency "," converted into currency (GBP)', '-6111 ", '-6112", "-6113", "A - 65", "A - 66", "-620905")

  DATACOPY "Curr NA ' to 'entry GBP;

  ENDFIX

  Thank you

  Anthony

• Error when creating a business rule

  Hi all
  
  I'm trying to create the regional service console m rule when I choose business rule > repsitory display > rules > new rule > select outline.
  I am able to select an essbase database schema, but while I am trying to select the outline planning I get the following error
  
  
  WARN http-10080-Processor4 com.hyperion.hbr.plugin.planning.PlanningMetadata - connection error in the metamorp-ee0b9e of Planning Server.
  
  
  Any suggestion?
  
  Thank you

  The problem is solved? You log on with the default admin user? Given that it is a question in the environmental assessments for business so rules using user default hyperion. For example, to create a new admin user and try. I hope this will help you!

  byeee
  Ankur

• Essbase Error (1200370) when executing business rule

  Hello
  
  
  I get the error: cannot calculate. Essbase Error (1200370): formula [average] runtime error (line 15): attempt to cross a member function [@X] null
  the performance of the following script.
  
  Fix (@relative("AltHierarchyProducts",0))
  Fix ("FY13", "Draft1", "budget")
  
  'Medium' = @MEMBER (@CONCATENATE ('P', @NAME (@PARENT (@CURRMBR ('products')))-> 'Variable' * (("Sales"->"Month1+"Sales"->"Month2"+"Sales"->"Month3")/3);))
  
  ENDFIX
  ENDFIX
  
  'Variable' is a member of the dimension account. When I remove the part '-> "Variable'", the script runs, but obviously no results since the Member account is missing.
  I've read a lot of posts about this error but could not solve this problem.
  
  
  A view of the hierarchy database is as under-
  Products-
  AltHierarchy
  -Cat1
  -Prod1
  -Prod2
  -Cat2
  -Prod3
  -Prod4
  PCat1-> "Variable" and "Variable" Pcat2 are placeholders that stores the values of the variables.
  
  Help, please.
  Thank you.
  
  Note: I use Essbase 11.1.2.1

  Is it possible that your function @MEMBER returns never really what anyone. You assumed that it works, but maybe it never works and it is only when you add the cross-dimensional operator, the question becomes obvious.

  for example if this does not work:

  Without cross Sun: 'Medium' = @MEMBER () * (("Sales"->"Month1+"Sales"->"Month2"+"Sales"->"Month3")/3);
  I'm not sure but maybe above returns something like #missing * (("Sales"->"Month1+"Sales"->"Month2"+"Sales"->"Month3")/3)

  With Lacrosse dim:
  "Medium '= @MEMBER ()->' Variable ' * (("Sales"->"Month1+"Sales"->"Month2"+"Sales"->"Month3")/3);
  Which I suppose would fail.

  You know what I mean? You could test this theory quite easy.

• The way a var as argument works do not (business rule)

  I tried to create a business rule that is able to say the amount of weeks between two dates, the post Re: behavior of days between two dates here has been very useful, but not everything works as expected.

  In the functions @JgetStringFromDouble (d2,@_false,@_false), if I write @JgetStringFromDouble (22,@_false,@_false)and use the static numbers for all the arguments, the business rule works without any problem. But if I try to run it with a var it validates correctly, but when the business rule execution it displays an error "error detected while trying to perform the work: DateDifference.

  In environmental assessments in the application log, I get the following messages:

  Failed to provision form/Conversion of date with the Code [37]

  Formula runtime error for [* BLOCK MEMBER of the post *]: status code in function [@TODATAEEX] [1200664]

  Transaction [0 x 130009 (0x5450fcfe.0x30958)] abandoned due to the State [1200664].

  Is there a workaround, or is there something I'm not? The only thing that prevents the code Re: behavior of days between two dates here to work, is that it won't work with a variable. Is there another way to pass the value of the variable to the function?

  Someone at - it an idea?

  Thank you!

  If you the GestionnaireCalc patch for more late then you will get 20 date functions and one is @CalcMgrWeeksBetween

  Concerning

  Celvin Kattookaran

• BR of planning does not work but I get a msg "Business Rule has been executed successfully"

  Description of the problem: we have a form that has periods as the dimension of the column, the activity and the entity for the dimension of row
  There are deletion of lack of blocks and the lack of data on the dimensions of the line
  
  We have a business rule to allow combinations of activities/entity so that people can see on the form and put the data in relation to it. It does this by putting a zero for the last period so that the combi row is deleted is no longer
  
  He worked for a year or two without any problems
  Recently, we had the problem where we run this business rule, and we get the message saying that it has successfully managed...
  However, this is not true since if I check the zero or another number is not done... Occasionally, the rule will be as work as expected to and put the number zero / in
  Usually we run the rule of a menu in a form of planning. But I also tried the rule running via EAS
  
  I created a new rule that has been simplified to the maximum, and yet I still get the same error
  The two rules below
  
  Any ideas how to debug this
  
  Thank you
  
  PRI
  
  PS: I am running Hyperion Planning 9.3.1.1.8
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  New rule
  ----------------------------------
  
  /**************************************************************************
  
  Create new project split activity
  -J' changed the rule so that I'm fixing sparse and 'If' on dense simplify as much as possible only and also simplified
  IE hard coded variables etc... See Code below
  
  ***************************************************************************/
  SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ
  UPDATECALC OFF SET;
  
  Fix("FCST","CurrVer","FY11","S000","E234-00000")
  
  FIX ("CA_DEL44")
  
  
  ("Proj_Hours"
  
  / * Assign value to variable, where there is already a value * /.
  
  / * Dept value equal to zero to create the block if there is already a value * /.
  IF ("Proj_Hours"-> "Mar" == #Missing)
  'Proj_Hours'-> 'Mar' = 1;
  ENDIF
  
  'Proj_Hours'-> 'Mar' = 2;
  
  )
  
  ENDFIX
  
  ENDFIX
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Rule of origin
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  /**************************************************************************
  Create new activity project split - original Code
  ***************************************************************************/
  SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ
  UPDATECALC OFF SET;
  VAR _var;
  
  DIFFICULTY ("TransCanada", "CurrVer", FcstYear & FcstMonths, "S000", [SLrtpSourceDept])
  
  Fix ("Proj_Hours")
  [SLrtpChargeableActivity] (
  @CALCMODE (TOPDOWN);
  / * Assign value to variable, where there is already a value * /.
  _var = [SLrtpChargeableActivity];
  / * Dept value equal to zero to create the block if there is already a value * /.
  IF(_var ==#missing)
  [SLrtpChargeableActivity] = 1;
  ENDIF
  
  )
  
  @IDESCENDANTS ("billable activities");
  
  ENDFIX
  ENDFIX
  
  Published by: 789458 on March 8, 2011 06:43
  
  Published by: 789458 on March 8, 2011 06:47

  For your new rule:
  When you try to create the block on a dense dimension, use SET CREATENONMISSINGBLK ON; rather than SET ON CREATEBLOCKONEQ;
  You can try to move the month in the instruction of fix in the new rule just to check if it makes a difference if the original one does not work.

• Strange error when you try to validate a business rule

  I get this strange error when I try to validate a business rule:
  
  Details: cannot calculate. Essbase Error (1200369): error optimize [69972] formula (line 38): cannot cross the same dimension members
  
  
  The rule is:
  
  DIFFICULTY (@RELATIVE ("SG & A", 0))
  '69972' = (("60001"-> "C1130"-> "Tous les projets"-> "Tous les employés») + ("69971"-> 'C1130'-> 'All projects'->"All employees")) * ' SG & a % of C1130 '-> 'No cost center'-> 'PNULL',-> 'no employee" * (("Effectifs"->"Tous les projets"->"Tous les employés»)-(«C1130 «->» effectifs»-> «Tous les projets»-> «Tous les employés»)) / (("Effectifs"->"SG & A"->"Tous les projets"->"Tous les employés»)-(«C1130 «->» effectifs»-> «SG & A»-> «)) ((All projects"->"All employees"));
  
  ENDFIX

  Msg of error indicates that you have used the operator of crossdim with the Member of the same sun. Cross the check again.
  EX:
  'C1130'-> 'Numbers'-> 'SG & A'-> 'All projects'-> 'all employees '.
  Are all these members belong to various dimesions?

• Problem with business rule-Essbase Error (1042017):

  Hello
  
  I get the following error when I run this business rule specifically.
  
  Details: cannot calculate. Essbase Error (1042017): network error: the client or the server timed out while waiting to receive data by using TCP/IP.  Check the network connections.  Increase the values NetRetryCount or NetDelay in the ESSBASE. CFG file. Update this file on the client and the server.  Restart the client, and then try again.
  
  I don't understand this error with any other rule. I checked the solution provided in this link
  _ [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10530_01/doc/epm.931/html_esb_error/erhelp.htm#ercalc.htm]. But this solution does not help because I do not get this error in any other rule.
  
  The rule that I run is
  
  'Depreciation value' = "Value Cumulative.Asset" / ("Assumptions_Programs"-> Jul-> @UDA (Entity,@NAME (@CURRMBR (rental))) - > @UDA (Location,@NAME (@CURRMBR (rental)))-> 'Active life in months');
  
  The functions in the above rule will not be replaced as below
  
  "Depreciation value' ="Value Cumulative.Asset"/"Assumptions_Programs"-> Jul-> IND_Assumptions-> LOC_IND->"active life in months. "
  
  If I hard code and run, I do not get this error. Help, please.
  
  Kind regards
  Brig.

  The reason why it works when you hard code and why it does not use when the UDA is simply that you should never have a multiple responses in a dimensional cross. Function @UDA returns multiple responses. Although in your case he brings only one I think it fires the calculation. Worse if you are actually bring multiple responses for @UDA that certainly isn't going to work.

  I understand all your corrections above the calcultion to recommend the best possible solution. But at least you understand why you get the error and you have difficulty

• fix outlook express 6.0 - no double bond no longer work after installing then uninstalling opera. Get this error "error signature opera Module 15 (logdoc)? Open is no longer in the list programs.

  How can I repair Outlook Express 6.  I wanted to watch opera and downloaded and decided it wasn't for me so uninstalled.  Now while in Outlook Express 6 and I received an email with a link pointed out when I click on it I get the message error thie.  "ERROR INITIALIZING OPERA MODULE 15 (LOGDOC)" and if the link does not work. Outlook Express is not listed in my software screen add & REMOVE in control PANEL.

  FIXED! -The problem is in file types

  A link to solve HERE

  Thanks for trying!

• MuseJSAssert: Error calling the function switch: TypeError: undefined is not an object (evaluation of "a.rules")

  I have this error on my Web site every time that I go. It disappears when I refresh three times.

  "MuseJSAssert: error calling the function switch: TypeError: undefined is not an object (evaluation of"a.rules").

  I downloaded the site with Filezila.

  Please help, what's wrong here?

  Thank you

  Hi Barbara,

  The question began to happen after you downloaded using the latest version of Muse?

  If so, can you try to remove the old files of the web server and re-upload using Muse?

  Kind regards

  Akshay

• Error of the Hyperion select business rule planning task list

  Hi all

  I created an application of planning (11.1.2.3) with two planning types. I have lists of tasks for each of them.

  The problem occurs when I assign to a task, a business rule and this business rule belongs to the second type of plan, the selection list appears empty and when I go back and select the type of plan fist again, empty the list of continuous selection.

  Is there a bug in the planning (I guess)? Is there no work around for this problem?

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  John

  Hello

  To-do lists are not specific to the Type of Plan.

  You assign objects to tasks, and they can be from anywhere in the same application.

  When you say the selection list what are you referring?  A command prompt that you have in your rule? Or when you try to assign your rule to the task?

  I've implemented on 11.1.2.3 without any problem.

  Have you done that you have deployed your calc rule manager?

  Thanks Anthony