Error in the approval process

Similar Questions

• Dangerous change in the approval process for iBooks

  you remember long time for approval of new iBooks users author books that publish their books on the iBook Store since the beginning. Originally, it was WEEKS, sometimes even months to get through the approval process. Fortunately, which improved considerably over time and now it's down to a period of 24 hours. remove your book from the store.

  I have published more than 17 books so far since the beginning of the iBook Store, and certainly, I look forward to this improvement. However, I just found out the hard way that this improvement comes with a terrible price.

  The new procedure:

  Is the approval process faster (not only) not due to more staff to go through the comments. Instead, it is due to an approval procedure has changed as it has been explained to me by the customer support. Now, the examiner spends less time going through the books to get quickly to the store. I don't know the details, but I guess they check the side more art if works and not actually reading it Word by Word.

  With this first less carefully past obviously comes a new stage. The Department for approval now takes books later (perhaps if they have more time or something) and check for any errors and delivers a ticket while your book is already on the iBook Store. In fact, at that time, that is not on the iBook Store more and this is the great potential disaster you should be aware of. If you get a ticket issued, your book get ripped the store until you propose changes and he crossed successfully a new review process, which could take days. It's wrong, really wrong, and he just happened to two of my books.

  Out of the blue, I got a ticket of the iBooks team for my book 'Logic Pro X - how it works', which lies on the line store since 2013 has been updated (and approved) last September. On one page, I had misspelled the name of "iBook" Store instead of "iBooks Store" and on another page, I got a link to the page of my book by asking readers to write a comment Amazon if they like my book. Of course, it was also a no-no (a multi-billionaire company referring to a competitor of billions of dollars with a link).

  I made the changes immediately and has the new version uploaded in an hour. But the review process took over 2 days, after I contacted support and recovery from the case. And here's the reason:

  At the moment they have issued the ticket, my book was not available on the iBook Store more, nothing, not even a mention that it is "temporarily unavailable" like Amazon. The visitors couldn't find the book, all the links from my Web site, twitter, facebook and other sites related, everything was made immediately a dead link. Not only did I lose money, I had to deal with customer e-mails explaining why they could not find the announced book. Last week, it happened with another book when I was in town for a week and had no files with me. And even once, it took 3 days to review the correction that I added 's' to the iBook Store.

  It is mind-boggling that the Team did iBook ' t think that through

  Why not keep the booking online during the update

  Why not give priority to the presentation (check two typos took longer than the initial review of the book).

  I asked the support team to issue feedback on this subject, so they can correct this procedure. In the meantime, you better watch for potential new tickets, or someone had the same problem already?

  HI Edgar,

  It's really good to know. Thank you

  Difficult to have a work around for this.

  (Got a ticket) Right now, I'm waiting for approval,

  After correcting a few minor problems.

  I hope this will get fixed soon.

  I like your idea to keep the original "approved."

  live version, until the update is approved.

  Should be a simple and logical

  changes to the procedure.

  Kind regards... Thomas

• STOP: c0000221 {Bad Image Checksum}. The image rpcrt.dll is possibly corrupt and recovery XP says error during the extraction process. Details of error: path not found___

  My friend turned on their laptop packard Bell recently and had the following problem. Windows XP screen loads but is then followed by a blue screen that says STOP: c0000221 {Bad Image Checksum}. The image rpcrt.dll is possibly corrupt. The header checksum does not match the checksum calculated.

  I can't the laptop to go further. I have accessed the Microsoft recovery Panel and try a non-destructive recovery as there are some precious photos that need backup. However, when you select 'no profile' to begin the recovery, I get the message:

  Error during the extraction process. Details of error: path not found

  I'm a bit of a novice when it comes to this sort of thing, but if someone can provide step by step help giving rise to lose photos, I'd be willing to give it a try. I also have XP Home Edition disk that came with the laptop but has never been opened. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you

  You hear your message said something about rpcrt4.dll?  It is important to relay the exact message you see.

  Please provide additional information on your system:

  What is your system brand and model?

  What is your Version of XP and the Service Pack?

  Describe your current antivirus and software anti malware situation: McAfee, Norton, Spybot, AVG, Avira!, Defender, ZoneAlarm, PC Tools, MSE, Comodo, etc..

  The question was preceded by a loss of power, aborted reboot or abnormal termination?  (this includes the plug pulling, buttons power, remove the battery, etc.)

  The afflicted system has a CD/DVD drive work?

  You have a true bootable XP installation CD (it is not the same as any recovery CD provided with your system)?

  You use some CD to access this Panel of Microsoft recovery where this "no profile" option is?  I don't know what all this means if it isn't some CD shipped with your system, in which case, I would use it for a coaster instead of something to fix your system.

  If the c:\windows\system32\rpcrt4.dll file is missing or afflicted, you do not start in the last good known Configuration.

  You also will not start in any kind of Mode safe no more.

  Even if you could boot mode safe, you would find that sfc/scannow does not work in Mode without failure in all cases (never).  If you try it, you'll see a message like this:

  Windows file protection could not initiate a scan of protected system files.

  The specific error code is 0x000006ba [the RPC server is unavailable.].

  Failed to start the RPC mode server safe either.

  I can't recreate your error exactly, but it is easy to replace the rpcrt4.dll file.  Looks like you have a working CD drive, so put yourself a Hiren boot CD and when you started on this, you can copy your precious files to a USB device for safety.

  There should be a backup copy of rpcrt4.dll already on your system, here or here:

  c:\Windows\System32\dllcache

  c:\windows\ServicePackFiles\i386

  You need to rename or replace the rpcrt4.dll file which is in c:\windows\system32 and replace it with one you will find the backup copies.

  There should be a backup copy of rpcrt4.dll already on your system, here or here:

  c:\Windows\System32\dllcache

  c:\windows\ServicePackFiles\i386

  When you get the Hiren's CD's, you can use to replace the missing or suspicious file.  If you need help with that, first get the Hiren's boot CD made and start over, then we can continue.

  Do you have a Hiren BootCD you can download here:

  http://www.hirensbootcd.NET/

  On the left, click on download, scroll down, choose the latest version, the download link is a little hard to see.  It is at the bottom of the page, above the drop for older versions and looks like this (click this component to download the ZIP file):

  Direct HTTP mirror + Torrent, Torrent Magnet

  Click the "Live HTTP Mirror" link to start the download and save the ZIP file on your desktop of somewhere that you can remember.

  The ZIP file is large, so the download will take probably some time to complete.  Then unzip the download to extract the Hirens.BootCD.ISO file that will be used to create your new bootable CD.

  Create a bootable CD. ISO file is not the same as simply copying the. File ISO onto a blank CD.  You must use software that includes how to burn a. ISO to a CD to create a bootable CD.

  File ZIP the Hiren is the file BurnToCD.cmd that you can double-click to launch it.  The BurnToCD.cmd will use the file BurnCDCC.exe to burn the. ISO file onto a blank CD using your existing CD burner.  You can also use your own burning software as long as your software is able to create a bootable CD. ISO file.  More modern burning programs can create a bootable CD. ISO image.  Create a CD from an ISO image bootable is not the same as just the file on a CD burning.

  If you need a simple and CD burning, this is a free software popular software:

  http://www.ImgBurn.com/

  Here are some instructions for ImgBurn:

  http://Forum.ImgBurn.com/index.php?showtopic=61

  It would be a good idea to test your new bootable CD on a computer running.

  You may need to adjust the computer BIOS settings to use the CD-ROM drive as the first device to boot instead of the hard drive.

  These adjustments are made before Windows tries to load.  If you miss it, you will need to restart the system again.

  When starting on the Hiren's CD, you will see a menu of options.  Choose Mini XP.  It will appear while Windows is loading and you will be presented with a desktop computer that has the look and feel of the interface of Windows Explorer, you are already accustomed to using.

  Using the Mini XP, you can access Internet, maneuvering around your system, search for files, copy files, replace the files and run the scans for malware, edit the text files (like the c:\boot.ini) etc.

  There are dozens of free and useful tools included in the CD that can be used to repair your system or copy your important personal files on another device (like a USB device or an external drive) in the case where you just give up and decide to reinstall your XP (I hope that you will not make this decision)

  Do, or do not. There is no test.

  I need YOUR voice and the points for helpful answers and propose responses. I'm saving for a pony!

• c:000021 has unrecoverable system error. The system process window logon ended unexpectedly with a blocking ststus 0x00000000. The system has been shut down

  c:000021 has unrecoverable system error. The system process window logon ended unexpectedly with a blocking ststus 0x00000000. The system has been shut down

  Pls teach the procedure for resolution of the problems of this error message.

  Hi mac62sg,

  Remember to make changes to the computer before this problem?

  You can follow the steps mentioned in the article below

  How to solve an error "STOP 0xC000021A.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/156669

  Important : this section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

  How to back up and restore the registry in Windows
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/322756/

  Thank you, and in what concerns:

  Ajay K

  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Is it possible to easily view the status of the approval process for a specific campaigns without having to open it?

  Hello

  Is it possible to easily view the status of the approval process for a specific campaign without having to open it?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes. Campaigns launch area, select open an existing campaign.

  Thank you

  edynamic expert Eloqua

• Satellite 5105-S702 Touch ED error during the startup process

  When I start my Satellite 5105 - S702 laptop with the v8.4.0.24 of antivirus from Computer Associates (CA) software is turned on, I get the following at the end of the boot process error message:

  Error affected

  Recovery of the THotkey failed. "
  Part took place - TouchED.exe - (THotkeyFindProc)
  Function failed - FindWindow)
  Error code: 0 x 00031402, 0x00000002

  However, when I disable the CA antivirus software and restart the laptop, I don't get the error message.

  Thus, it would seem that the CA AntiVirus software causes this error message.

  Would be grateful if someone could give advice if they have this problem with this laptop model, or the Satellite 5105-S701, or European equivalent model 5100-603, and how they have rectified it.

  Thank you

  AlanCB

  Hello

  I agree with you.
  In my view the installed (CA) anti-virus software is not fully compatible with the Toshiba Hotkey Utility or the software anti-virus doesn't recognize properly and can not handle.

  CA anti-virus does not for me but maybe you could set some parameters to ignore the Hotkey Utility from Toshiba.

  Maybe it helps if not I recommend you contact Computer Associates support team.

• Questions about the approval process

  I'm currently waiting on my plug-in to be approved and it has been about 2 days... to better manage my own and our customers expectations on updates of the extension that we have done, I have a few questions:

  • I have been informed that approval takes up to 2 weeks. Is it possible to speed up the process?
  • Is there a way to see the status of your approval beyond "submitted changes?
  • After approval, the addition of extension patches also require an approval process?
  • After approval, updates like text descriptions or image updates require an approval process?

  Thank you for your time and consideration, any help is appreciated.

  (1) maybe if you write an email to [email protected]

  (2) no

  (3) Yes

  (4) Yes

• Object is not be displayed during the approval process

  Hello
  
  The purpose of my custom connector shape is not get displayed in the IOM 10 g approval process. We have upgraded to patch BP19. Previously, Im doubting if it occurred after the upgradation of patch and work... Can anyone please share your suggestions?
  
  Thank you

  Try below

  1. Please provide all permissions as insert, update and delete for role in object permissions (hopefully you did)
  2. just to check Add your role or all USERS tab

  3. check in the resource object 'itself demand allowed'

  Kind regards
  Nayan

• Q: integrate the approval process

  Hi all
  
  I'm looking for some information with an approval process for a resource regarding.
  
  I m having resources, called 'X '. I want to integrate an approval process when users are created through manual processes and for the same resource users should get created automatically via GTC flat file.
  
  
  Please guide me on how to make this implementation.
  
  
  Kind regards
  877247

  Access policy: used for the supply of users in the target Application when they enter the IOM after reconciliation.

  You can create two cgroups employee and contractor
  Create the rule of membership for both of these groups as role is used and role == contractor

  Create two access with and without the approval policies and attach it to the corresponding group.

  Second case:

  Create an approval workflow
  Add a task (UNCONDITIONAL), connect your adapter that will check the type of user as employee or Contrcator and decide whether or not you need approval.
  This task will return answers "NEED_APPROVAL" and "APPROVAL_NOTREQUIRED".

  On NEED_APPROVAL, call your other task which will be simultaneously assign a group
  On APPROVAL_NOT_REQUIRED does not call something.

• Error initializing the asynchronous process

  Hi guys,.
  
  As suggested by several messages and items, process asynchronous is preferable because of its flexibility. I'm very happy with it until I have the following problem.
  
  We do fault handling on all our processes, using the hook and the policy fault. For an asynchronous process, we use another unmanaged code to return the fault. Recently, we noticed a problem. For some reason, every Sunday when the production BPEL server restarts, there are always a few BPEL process turned to retirement and offshore. We have already created a demand for service for it on metalink. But what causes another very serious issue:
  
  The calling BPEL instance sends a request to start the asynchronous process. As it is turned off and removed by accident, the initialization fails. But, as it is asynchronous, the calling process is not notified, which means that there is no fault raised to the calling process. This causes a lot of trouble because we are not notified of the problem. This was never a problem because we had not the process stops and withdraws before.
  
  This can be easily verified by a simple test case. Create a synchronous process a and process asynchronous B. leave a B invoke. Then turn off and retreat B. An instance can still be successfully executed without saying the problem calling B. If B is a synchronous process, a will always communicate a flaw in such situation.
  
  Of course, the domain log file records this ORABPEL-02106 problem. but we do not want to check the log file all the time and want to be notified when it arrives. Is it possible to catch this exception/fault in the appeal process?
  
  Thanks in advance!
  
  Steven
  
  Published by: sw12345 on July 26, 2010 09:41

  Aysnchronous by itself is supposed to be loosely coupled with the appellant. So the behavior you see is expected. BPEL persists the message invoke the message and Summoner of collection of discussions the message to process when the process is ready to pick it up.

  If you need to blame either visible by the appellant - you can disable this intermediate persistence of setting low configuration in bpel.xml of wedged.

  
  OFF.immediate
  

  -Sridhar

• Error in the post process event handler

  We should write a process post event handler that updates the field Manager. So, I used the following code to update the Manager field when a user is created:
  
  Code:
  
  public EventResult run (long processId, long eventId,
  Orchestration of the orchestration) {}
  System.out.println ("Test for the event handler");
  Try
  {
  Take string = getUserKey (processId, orchestration);
  System.out.println ("USERKEY1" + take);
  UserManager userMgmt = Platform.getService (UserManager.class);
  System.out.println ("USERMANAGEMENT" + userMgmt);
  System.out.println (userMgmt.modify (User (take))) of new;
  userMgmt.modify ("usr_mgr_key", "28", new User (take));
  System.out.println ("USERKEY2" + take);
  
  
  } catch (ValidationFailedException e) {}
  System.out.println ("Exception1");
  } catch (AccessDeniedException e) {}
  System.out.println ("Exception2") ;} {} catch (UserModifyException e)
  System.out.println ("Exception3") ;} {} catch (NoSuchUserException e)
  System.out.println ("Exception4") ;} {} catch (SearchKeyNotUniqueException e)
  }
  return new EventResult();
  }
  
  
  private String getUserKey (long processID, orchestration of the Orchestration) {}
  Take string;
  String entityType = orchestration.getTarget () .getType ();
  Result of the EventResult;
  result = new EventResult();
  System.out.println ("Feature Type" + entityType);
  System.out.println ("PID" + processID);
  
  If (! orchestration.getOperation () .equals ("CREATE")) {}
  Take = orchestration.getTarget () .getEntityId ();
  System.out.println ("UserKEY0" + take);
  } else {}
  OrchestrationEngine orchEngine = (OrchestrationEngine.class) Platform.getService;
  Take = (String) orchEngine.getActionResult (processID);
  System.out.println ("Take-1" + take);
  }
  Return take;
  
  }
  
  It compiles very well, and when we try to create a user, the user is created successfully. But the expected behaviours of the upadting field Manager with the key to the user '28' are not the case. My highest approach: is it good or is there another method that will make it work?
  
  The output message I see is:
  
  Test for the event handler
  TypeUser entity
  Process ID140343
  Take-1613
  USERKEY1613
  USERMANAGEMENToracle.iam.identity.usermgmt.api.UserManagerDelegate@75ecf9ed
  < 27 February 2012 10:56:41 hours GMT > < WARNING > < oracle.iam.callbacks.common > < ARA-2030146 > < [CALLBACKMSG] are present for this eventhandler async to policies? : false >
  oracle.iam.identity.usermgmt.vo.UserManagerResult@14da2ada
  < 27 February 2012 10:56:44 hours GMT > < error > < oracle.iam.identity.usermgmt.impl > < ARA-3051212 > < an error occurred when searching for users -: [usr_mgr_key]. >
  Licence4
  
  
  Thank you
  Krish

  I hope that the incorrect coding.
  Use this code.

  UserManager userMgmt = oimClient.getService (UserManager.class);
  Attribute to change
  HashMap atrrMap = new HashMap ();
  atrrMap.put ("usr_manager_key", Long.valueOf("1")); the user will be updated with key Manager 1 (xelsysadm) make sure usr_key 1 (Manager) are in IOM.
            
  get the user you want to change
  User user = userMgmt.getDetails ("usr_key", "41", null);
  User = new User (String.valueOf (user.getId ()), atrrMap);
  Result UserManagerResult = userMgmt.modify ("usr_key", String.valueOf("41"), user);
  UserManagerResult str = userMgmt.modify ("usr_mgr_key", "111", new User ("41"));
  System.out.println ("UserUpdate.Process ()" + result.getStatus ());

  Also do not use the UserManager class, he can go for a loop.
  Use
  EntityManager entityManager = Platform.getService (EntityManager.class);
  entityManager.modifyEntity (orchestrationTarget.getType (), take, mapAttrs);

  I assume you want to use the manager associated with use of the user cases.

  Thank you
  Kuldeep

• Cannot remove a folder. Error: Required the approval of the system changes to the folder and the files

  I recently encountered a problem with a file of unknown origin and content. When I try to delete files / folder I get a message that I need permission from the system to change the files or folders. I am the only user on my laptop and have always had administrator rights to make the changes necessary and desired.

  Hello

  1 are there any changes or updates made on the computer?

  2. What is the full and exact error message?

  Method 1:

  I suggest you run Microsoft Safety Scanner for any malware or spyware infection and check if it helps.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Note: the data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means there is a risk of data loss.

  Method 2:

  See article for appropriating the file and then delete it.

  Troubleshoot "access denied" when opening files or folders

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-access-denied-when-opening-files-or-folders

  See also:

  Why cannot delete a file or folder

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/why-cant-I-delete-a-file-or-folder

  Let us know if it helps.

• Automate the approval process in creative cloud Portal

  Heyho dear community,

  I was wondering if there is a method to "talk" on the portal of creative cloud programmatically, as the way that you can do with Microsoft Office 365 portal. I want to automate the process 'Install the software license - guest User - order' and to implement as part of our services. We use SCCM to deploy the software, and licenses are purchased from a retailer. But there is a way to order a new license directly in the portal and set it to a user, without having completed the process of order (on the site of the dealer).

  Long story short: I got the idea to write a script that runs when the dealer sent an email as "license ordered" and creates then the license in the portal prompts the user and triggers an another script that does some "things SCCM. So far, I wasn't able to find documentations that would build this scenario... Does anyone of you have experience in the automation of processes related to the creative cloud and can share his knowledge to me?

  Thanks for your help!

  Kind regards

  Christoph L.

  There are features to automate adding, deleting and editing rights for the Enterprise Dashboard.

  See User Management API

• Error on the last process in a package stops the loadplan

  I use 11.1.1.6.  I have 3 packages that run several interfaces and a support plan that runs each package as a step.

  Each step in the package has a branch of success and a branch of the failure that goes to the next step.  If any step fails, I still want to continue to the next step.  He appears in the last step in a package fails, workload is not running the next step in the plan of care.

  In all cases do continue?  Workload has "reboot of the new session" together for the restart field.

  A couple of options for you:

  (1) you can associate an exceptional step to step that fails in terms of load. Then in the exception of dynamic loading Plan Properties Management section, set the Exception with the Exception of running and ignore behavior. This means that even if Plan to charge geneates stage an exception still go on nest stage of execution.

  (2) in your packages still have a final step which will return a success criteria

• I accidentally uninstalled CC... Error during the installation process.

  I accidentally uninstalled the bad adobe photo shop. I tried to uninstall the old CS6 and ended up uninstalling the new CC for 2014. I try to install CC again using my cloud create an account and it got 95% and could not telling me to contact customer support (49)? How can I install CC?

  Too bad, for some reason any he was installing in fact even if the creative cloud said it failed? It works now, I hope that he properly installed and I won't have any question relating to its functionality?