ESW-520-24-K9 supperted SFP

Similar Questions

• ESW 520 8 ports - firmware update

  Hello

  We have an ESW 520 8 ports currently on the 2.1.1.19 firmware version (version of boot 1.0.0.07, VID V01) - serial number CBT15100AN2

  The latest version of the firmware is 2.1.1.21, that we have downloaded and through the Maintenance, update the software, via HTTP, performed an upgrade to this version - upgrade appears to complete, will connect to see success but when we restart the switch it always shows as 2.1.1.19. Very strange!

  Can someone advise please how to get the upgrade to successfully apply?

  Sincere greetings,

  Dale.

  Hi Dale,

  Have you changed the active firmware image to the new version before rebooting? (Maintenance-> file management-> Image Active)

  Best,

  David

  Please evaluate the useful messages and identify the right answers.

• ESW-520-24 p not able to connect to a Catalyst 3560 G + compatible with SPA942?

  Hi all

  a customer bought an ESW-520-24 p for use in a VoIP project. Today we had difficulties to connect to a switch of 3650 G of catalyst; We tried to set the port to the trunk, general, customer and access and changed all sorts of settings VLAN on the 3560G switch nothing helps: the switches just interconnection used. While sniffing, we saw that the ARP requests are unresponsive even, if something is at a low level, no doubt with VLAN-ing.

  Someone at - it an idea if these switches must be connected between them and if so, what do I do?

  On the other hand; voice turns on VLANS separated and the customer will use SPA942 phones that have an internal switch that allows a PC to connect. I used this call successfully with the Catalyst Express switches and I didn't have to do anything for VLAN-ing, it worked 'out of the box. Can anyone confirm that these phones work with switches for small businesses as well?

  THX!

  Bart

  Hi Bart,.

  I quickly set up the simulation.  It took me more time to write this that actually do the work.

  I grabbed my handy Cisco 3560 catalyst switch.  I plugged port FastEthernet 23 plugged into my UC520.  My Uc520 is my voice system and the DHCP server.

  I have the 24 FastEthernet port connected to my Cisco 3560 in my ESW540 - 24 p.  On 3 of my ESW540 switch port - 24 p, I plugged a phone SPA962...

  I guess that my simulation is close enough to your hardware.  The configuration should be the same I guess.

  Here is the configuration of my Cisco 3560 switch;

  interface FastEthernet0/23

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport autostate exclude

  switchport mode trunk

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/24

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport autostate exclude

  switchport mode trunk

  interface Vlan1

  192.168.10.3 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan100 (VLAN100 ends on my UC520 and has the DHCP scope)

  no ip address

  !

  interface Vlan200

  no ip address

  !

  Check that the tree covering weight is not blocking the ports of uplink with the command show spanning tree. I ask you to try what I must admit that this uplink to my UC520 was in a BLK State on the VLAN by default.  I HAD TO CORRECT.

  I plugged my phone SPA962 on my ESW switch, it lit.

  VLAN 100 as my voice VLAN, I had to set manually what VLAN the SPA phone will reside in.  Otherwise, it will try to retrieve a default IP VLAN.

  • I have manually by pressing the button (below the button of the envelope) on the phone in the SPA
  • Scroll down and select 'network '.
  • Scroll again option VLAN and select Edit.
  • I changed the setting to select Enable VLAN Yes.
  • Click the OK button.
  • I then scroll down to the option VLAN ID.
  • Choose the edit button to change the VLAN ID information
  • I register 100 to and selected OK.

  My phone has received an IP address from my 100 VLAN address 10.1.1.X.

  Fortunately, the ESW520 has a pretty good GUI, in which case you can add a new vlan and the trunk at all ports.

  Here's an example of how I added the vlan 200 to the ESW switch and started adding the Tagged ports switch ports.  I have to do all the ports where you need a VLAN.

  

  I then as seen below my new adds VLAN as a port Tagged to all ports of the switch.

  You can see from my screenshot below I was adding VLAN 200 to interface G2 as labeled interface.

  

  Don't forget NOT to SAVE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS ON BOTH THE 3560 and the ESW520

  

  hope this helps

  Best regards, Dave

• On the Maximum of Source Ports on a Port Destination ESW 520 24 P

  The ESW 520 24 P does support mirrored 20 Ports traffic at the Port of Destination 1?

  Hi Andy

  Without media ESW mirroring groups each of which can mirror 8 ports to a destination port.

  It is fine for normal problem determination purposes. I can guess your application.

  What about Dave

• ESW 520 give priority to IP addresses

  I have a LAN with IP addresses for the computers and public, static IP for VoIP phones. They are a hosted VoIP provider, and I want to give priority to the public IPs from my ESW-520-48 per switch How I implemented that in this switch?

  I have no roles assigned on ports and no configuration of VLAN either. I had tried to separate the VLAN first, but eliminated this way. It is once again all VLAN 1 now on the switch. For some reason when I put in place of the 100 VLAN for voice, the voice stopped working on phones, but data were always very good.

  Hi netguy,.

  QOS in rewriting the DSCP (dissociated Services Code Point) address IP phone range by;

  1. create an ACL that specifies the range of IP addresses with mask reverse

  2. attach the ACL on a map of advanced class, then

  3. fix a plan of class to a table of QOS policy that is configured to set a new DSCP value

  4. attach a QOS policy on an interface

  5 but you have a default Advanced QOS configuration already in place, so that should be modified or deleted.

  It is difficult if you have never played with before advanced QOS or understand the latest five statements.

  I guess that your hosted IP phones have DSCP settings (dissociated Services Code Point) already placed on IP phones or the settings that you can set directly on each IP phone?

  If it is possible, why not just move the switch to the basic QOS mode and then say the switch to trust DSCP.

  Well, it's the best thing to do.

  

  

  Best regards, Dave

• ESW-520-24 P has not managed the custom VIRTUAL local network traffic

  Hi all

  We recently bought a switch ESW-520-24 p to replace a CE500 end-of-life.  The facility where the switch is installed has access wireless connected to the VLAN 110 points.

  Course the ESW-520-24 p switch does not support VTP so none VLAN is to be propagated to it.  So I created 110 VLAN manually and ports assigned to him.  But the devices on ports communicate with anything.

  All ports are configured as access with 110 ports VLAN not identified.  The uplink is the g2 port which is in binding mode.

  Can someone please tell me what I can have configured wrong?

  Thank you

  -Steve

  Hi Steve,.

  If it is for UC500 installation, the default configuration on the ESW is normally perfect and the switch has to be turned on.

  Otherwise that looks like you have made the correct things.

  I guess VLAN1 is always present on the ESW switch, but excluded by access ports...

  All ports are not marked in VLAN110 except for the uplink, given that the packages of vlan tagged while waiting to switch receiver VLAN110 or unmarked packages?  (something to think quickly)

  But the result is if you are still in a stalemate, why not call the Small Business Support Center, the switch is probably still under warranty and telephone support.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  Best regards, Dave

• Small businesses-ESW-520-48P-K9

  I need to decide on a few things about this switch before recommending this option to my client. I have the following questions that I need expert advice.

  Questions

  1.) this switch supports POE 15.4 on all 48 10/100 ports (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total nominal power of this switch is only 370W and if it divided with 48 ports, each port can drive only 7W. So therefore the confusion.

  2.) / * style Definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 to 5.4pt 0 to 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; do-size: 10.0pt; do-family: "Times New Roman", "serif" ;} "} The series may be monitored and managed using Ciscoworks LMS ESW?

  3.) MGBSX1 is compatible with GLC-SX-MM

  Thank you.

  
  I need to decide on few things regarding this switch before recommending this switch to my customer. I have the following questions that i need some expert advice.
  Questions
  1.) Does this switch support POE 15.4W on all 48 10/100 ports (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total power rating of this switch is only 370W and if this divided with 48 ports, each port can only drive 7W. So thus the confusion.
  2.) Can the ESW Series be Monitored and Managed using Ciscoworks LMS?
  3.) Is MGBSX1 compatible with GLC-SX-MM
  Thanks.
  
  

  Hello

  Please see the attached document for your queries!

  Hope to help!

  Ganesh.H

  Don't forget to note the useful message

• ESW-520-8 p-K9 POE capabilities

  Can the ESW-520-8 p-K9 provide enough POE to take in charge 7 PVC2300 cameras?  If not, what are its limits?

  Hello

  The ESW 520 8 ports offers a maximum power of 15.4 to any 10/100 port; Total of 60W.

  The ESW 540 8 ports offers a maximum power of 15.4 to any port 10/100/1000; Total 123W.

  By the PVC2300 datasheet, each camera has a consumption of 10W.

  If you need 7 cameras supported, you can consider the 8-port ESW540. Another option is to power the cameras via the external power adapter, assuming that a power source is nearby.

  I hope this helps.

  Bert Wilhelm

  Solutions of the APW

  Austin, TX

• Intel PCI X 520 10 WHAT GIGABIT SFP + not loaded in ESXI 6.0

  Hi all

  I'm under ESXI 6.0 and installed the latest drivers from intel PCI X 520 10 Giga cards with branch above DELL SFP modules I searched the forum for similar issues and found that it was perhaps the module are not supported so here my info of the commands below

  I have also the same out put regarding this thread cards PCI of Intel x 520 (82599EB) and the correct SFP + modules

  less /var/log/vmkernel.log | grep-i "FPS".

  (2015 09-29 T 08: 53:22.296Z cpu2:33341) < 3 > IGB 0000:0: 00.0: failed to load because a type of module SFP + and QSFP not supported has been detected.

  (2015 09-29 T 08: 53:22.316Z cpu2:33341) < 3 > IGB 0000: 0a: 00.1: failed to load because a type of module SFP + and QSFP not supported has been detected.

  also this command

  lspci | grep vmnic *.

  0000:03:00.0 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719 [vmnic0] Gigabit Ethernet

  0000:03:00.1 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719 [vmnic1] Gigabit Ethernet

  0000:03:00.2 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719 [vmnic2] Gigabit Ethernet

  0000:03:00.3 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719 [vmnic3] Gigabit Ethernet

  0000:07:00.0 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720 [vmnic4] Gigabit Ethernet

  0000:07:00.1 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720 [vmnic5] Gigabit Ethernet

  0000: 0a: 00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation 82599 10 Gigabit double Port card WIRELESS [vmnic6]

  0000: 0a: 00.1 Network controller: Intel Corporation 82599 10 Gigabit double Port card WIRELESS [vmnic7]

  the problem is the vmnic6 and 7 is not displayed on the list vmnic

  ethtool-i vmnic6

  Cannot control himself fd: no such file or directory

  I also checked this thread How can I activate my to use 10GbE ports (need to create new VMKernel) are not in the list of adapters.

  VMware-l

  VMware ESXi 6.0.0 GA

  list of network adapter for the network esxcli

  Name PCI Device Driver status Admin link status speed Duplex MAC address MTU Description

  ------  ------------  ------  ------------  -----------  -----  ------  -----------------  ----  -------------------------------------------------------

  vmnic0 0000:03:00.0 tg3 Up Up 1000 Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 20 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic1 0000:03:00.1 tg3 Up Up 1000 Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 21 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic2 0000:03:00.2 tg3 Up Up 1000 Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 22 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic3 0000:03:00.3 tg3 Up Up 1000 Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 23 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic4 0000:07:00.0 tg3 Up Down 0 40:a8:f0:36:15:0e half 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720

  vmnic5 0000:07:00.1 tg3 Up Down 0 40:a8:f0:36:15:0f half 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720

  also check the bios for a similar option

  BIOS "Default memory mapped IO above 4 GB option in the BIOS.".

  I have not found this option, I HP Proliant DL380 Gen8.

  esxcfg-NICS - l

  Name PCI Driver link speed Duplex MAC address MTU Description

  vmnic0 0000:03:00.0 tg3 up to 1000Mbps Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 20 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic1 0000:03:00.1 tg3 up to 1000Mbps Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 21 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic2 0000:03:00.2 tg3 up to 1000Mbps Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 22 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic3 0000:03:00.3 tg3 up to 1000Mbps Full 40:a8:f0:29:6 has: 23 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719

  vmnic4 0000:07:00.0 tg3 0Mbps Down a half 40:a8:f0:36:15:0e 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720

  vmnic5 0000:07:00.1 tg3 0Mbps Down a half 40:a8:f0:36:15:0f 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720

  output-l esxcfg-module
  See attached file

  
  

  and one thing is in the bios I have unknown pci

  
  

  See attached file

  
  

  

  
  

  
  

  the question is do I have to replace the sfp only or the entire map that I bought recently or is there a fix for it in the latest version of ESXI?

  Thank you

  I can confirm compatibility.

  also a comment is to use the intel SFP modules with Pci cards intel. who works on esxi servers

• VLAN 2 switch ESW - 520

  For the test I used 2 switch this name 'ESW X' and 'Y ESW '.

  I have 2 network that I named "Network A" and "Network B".

  I build a VLAN 2 for each network named Vlan 2 for network and Vlan 3 to network B, I do not use Vlan 1 because it is the default Vlan

  Configuration ESW X:

  port e1: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  port E2: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  E3 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  E4 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  G3 port: with 1 (default) UNTTAGGED Vlan TRUNK PORT and Vlan tagged WITH 2 and 3 to Vlan

  Configuration ESW Y:

  port e1: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  port E2: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  E3 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  E4 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  G3 port: with 1 (default) UNTTAGGED Vlan TRUNK PORT and Vlan tagged WITH 2 and 3 to Vlan

  I use for the test computer 2 with the same class IP address.

  Test result:

  Communication between ESW X e1 and e2 x ESW => OK

  Communication between ESW X e3 and e4 x ESW => OK

  Communication between ESW e1 and e2 ESW Y => OK

  Communication between ESW e3 and e4 ESW Y => OK

  Communication between e1 ESW X and Y of the ESW e1 or e2-online NOK

  Communication between e2 ESW X and Y of the ESW e1 or e2-online NOK

  Communication between e3 ESW X and Y of the ESW e3 or e4-online NOK

  Communication between e4 ESW X and Y of the ESW e3 or e4-online NOK

  Each Vlan cannot communicate with the switch, I think they have a problem in my configuration of vlan / port, can you help me.

  Hi, Thibaud,.

  Thank you for the purchase of the ESW switches.

  Just out of curiosity, you are using the latest firmware on your version of switch ESW 2.1.19

  But of course, you seem like you have a great understanding of Tagged and VLAN no tagged of you ad description... great stuff.

  I just tried your configuration, I can communicate between ESW540 - 24 p-switch and a SF300 - 48p.

  Sorry, I don't have two switches handy ESW. But it doesn't matter. Standards based Ethernet is I hope that some standards based on ethernet

  My configuration of vlan below for my ESW540 - 24 p and it works very well.

  I plugged just ports of the switch 24 between the two switches together, that's why the 24 port is labeled in each of the screenshots below.

  I really really doubt you would have a problem, unless there is something fundimental or basic you did for example do not save the configuration running on the boot configuration.  Obviously do not save the configuration before a power down will kill the configuration.

  (saved your configuration in each switch)

  

  

  Here is a copy of a part of my switch running configuration, which were a result of me playing with the ESW configuration utility.

  (Note that my switch has all Gigabit ethernet ports ;)

  serial interface ethernet g(1-2)

  switchport vlan trunk native 2

  output

  interface ethernet g24

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2

  output

  serial interface ethernet g(3-4)

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  output

  interface ethernet g24

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 3

  output

  If you still have questions, here's what URL to the Small Business Support Center contact, perhaps a new set of eyes can spot the problem.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  Best regards, Dave

• Are there plans for the new ESW 500 models switch with PoE capability?

  I know that current models of ESW 500 switch don't have enough capacity to power all the switchports to 15.4, even if the ESW-540-8 p model has almost enough capacity to power all the switchports to 15.4.

  Reasons why new ESW 500 switch with PoE capacity are necessary:

  • The existing PoE 500 ESW switches have not always enough when these devices are deployed with the UC500:
    • 7945, 7965 and 797 x phones
    • series phones (not yet supported with the SBCS solution) 9900 and 8900
    • PVC2300 Surveillance Cameras
    • AP541N access points
  • The UC560 comes with all the PoE ports and requires at least an ESW switch be deployed
  • Version 48 ports gigabit switch ESW is currently available only in the version not PoE, and we need a version of 48 gigabit ports for users of the UC560 solution.

  Existing ESW 500 switch PoE capabilities are:

  • ESW-520-8 P: 60W
  • ESW-540-8 P: 120W
  • ESW-520-24 P: 180W
  • ESW-540-48P: 380W
  • ESW-540-24 P: 280W

  PoE of ESW 500 switch capabilities supporting 15.4 full power on all PoE PoE ports are:

  • 8 port: 123.2W
  • 24 port: 369.6W
  • 48 port: 739.2W

  Are there plans to release the new ESW 500 switch models increased capacity, enough to supply the full 15.4 to all PoE ports with PoE?

  Hi John - Thank you for your participation in the small community of business support. I talked to our switch product manager and want to share his response.

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style - qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 to 5.4pt 0 to 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; do-size: 10.0pt; do-family: "Times New Roman", "serif" ;} "}

  We have taken the conscious decision to deliver PoE as ESW and other switches for small businesses for several reasons:

  • Endpoints PoE more attract a lot less than the 15.4 W maximum power. Most IP phones are below the range of 7W.
  • A typical deployment would most PoE devices connect to a switch.
  • For these reasons, the ESW is not burdened cost with the PoE feature which would not be used most of the time.
  • All ports are still able to PoE you can connect up to 24 devices PoE Switch 24 ports to any point in time, as long as the handset is in the title of the budget.
  • Therefore, given that these products are intended for small business and the price is an important factor, we opted for this approach.

  We do not have a product at full power on all ports in the Cisco Small Business portfolio, except in the arena of 8 channels. Within Cisco, Cisco Catalyst products support this today.

  Thanks again for the question,

  Stephanie Reaves

  Cisco Small Business

• Set up two separate networks with access to shared resources

  Hi all

  We have a two separate companies in the same building which will both need access to shared resources and the same internet connection. They must be on separate subnets cannot communicate directly with each other. The current switch is a Cisco ESW-520-48P and we are looking to buy an SG-300-20 p for the new entity moving in. Heres how we envisage the establishment:

  • ESW-520 will host network company A. workstations, servers, etc.
  • SG - 300 will be two VLANS. Vlan1 will host any business network (B) workstations, servers, etc. VLAN2 will host shared resources, such as printers.
  • The internet gateway is a system based on UNIX with 3 CARDS. 2 NETWORK cards is absorbed by ADSL connections, while the other card NETWORK LAN, linking to VLAN2 on the SG-300. We would like to define which connection ADSL to carry through according to what subnet traffic is originating.
  • The ESW-520 need access to shared resources and the internet gateway on VLAN2 on the SG-300.

  This will be possible with these two switches? It would be the best way to go about this?

  Appreciate any recommendations that you can provide.

  Thank you

  Tom

  Hi Tom, yes the ESW can be either an access port to the vlan 2, unidentified or you can configure the trunk for the host devices on two subnets on the ESW, your choice. When the SX300 is L3 it will load the intervlan routing when you assign IP addresses for the interfaces of VLAN locally.

  Default gateways will be the SX300 Lass (interface vlan).  There will always be a route established between subnets so assign each vlan an IP address.

  You'll see ARP of course through the subnets of course. Not sure the DHCP acknowledgement, etc..

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• R.620 with two INTEL X 520 Dual Port 10 GB DA / SFP +.

  We have R620s running for our VMware ESXi environment. Currently, each server has an Intel x 520 with sfp + ports 10 GB (2) and (2) gig ethernet ports. Each server also has a Broadcom 4 gig ethernet card port. Can I exchange the Broadcom card on each server with a different Intel x 520, so that each server has ports sfp + 10 GB (4) and (4) gig ethernet ports?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  jmartinich

  Ports sfp + 10 GB Intel x 520 with (2) and (2), gig ethernet ports

  Which resembles the daughterboard X 520/I350 network. You have only a NDC slot in the system, only one of those can take place. I do not show a similar adapter PCIe version.

  If you have 2 PCIe 3 slot CPU configuration while you might add just another X 520 dual port. If you have a PCIe 2 connector configuration so I am not all ports that you are wanting to get a valid population.

  Thank you

• Make a choice of switching - catalyst 500/520/ESW Linksys SRW / SFE

  Hello someone would be able to clarrify please where Cisco takes in what concerns the SMB switching product portfolio that I'm getting a little confussed.

  My estimate that we currently have available that which follows to the SMB market, has decided there is a price difference significant between some of the product lines, but it seems that the choice when choosing a suitable switch fades a bit and starts to go down in price rather than the features and performance characteristics.

  • Cisco Catalyst Express 500 series switches
  • Cisco Catalyst Express 520 series switches
  • Cisco Small Business Pro ESW 500 series switches
  • Cisco Small Business Managed switch (Linksys Business Series)
  • Cisco Small Business Smart switch (Linksys Business Series)
  • Cisco Catalyst 2960 Series switches
  1. Can I ask if there are plans to merge some of the ranges of products like the 500 and 520, which are the two similiarly priced, managed in almost the same way and have the same function defined.
  2. Are there plans for the ESW line replace the Linksys SRW/SFE and Cisco 500/520 existing equivalents?
  3. I would correct assuming the ESW line runs the Code of IOS?

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Concerning

  Mark Rigby

  Mark,

  Big questions.  Thanks for posting.

  1. Yes, you can expect that over time, the ESW 500 series will replace the Catalyst Express series.

  2. There are no plans for the series of ESW 500 replace SRW/SFE switches.  These product families are somewhat overlapping, but intended for different types of SME customers and partners VAR.

  3. you are incorrect in assuming that the ESW is base IOS.  It is not the case.

  The attached PDF provides a comparison of high-level Cisco switches that sell on SMB.

  Thank you

  Florian

• Fix DA cable for Intel X 520 DP 10 GB DA / SFP + adapter Server

  Hello

  We need connect directly two servers that have two "Intel X 520 DP 10 GB DA / SFP + server adapter 806654 [540-BBCT]."

  What is the right cable to connect these two network cards? This one is OK: "3 m SFP + 10 GB Direct Attach Twinaxial Cable 3MTSFC [407-BBPQ]"? Also, if we use Dell cable or can we also use another brand cable?

  Thank you

  Best regards

  Davide

  Buongiorno,

  both codes i parte 540-BBCT-407-BBPQ non esistono nei nostri listini.

  Per quanto if I cavi di special, potete utilizzare any cavo adatto a questo, schede sono delle Intel hardware.

  Speaking saluti

  Manual