VLAN 2 switch ESW - 520

Similar Questions

• ESW-520-24 P has not managed the custom VIRTUAL local network traffic

  Hi all

  We recently bought a switch ESW-520-24 p to replace a CE500 end-of-life.  The facility where the switch is installed has access wireless connected to the VLAN 110 points.

  Course the ESW-520-24 p switch does not support VTP so none VLAN is to be propagated to it.  So I created 110 VLAN manually and ports assigned to him.  But the devices on ports communicate with anything.

  All ports are configured as access with 110 ports VLAN not identified.  The uplink is the g2 port which is in binding mode.

  Can someone please tell me what I can have configured wrong?

  Thank you

  -Steve

  Hi Steve,.

  If it is for UC500 installation, the default configuration on the ESW is normally perfect and the switch has to be turned on.

  Otherwise that looks like you have made the correct things.

  I guess VLAN1 is always present on the ESW switch, but excluded by access ports...

  All ports are not marked in VLAN110 except for the uplink, given that the packages of vlan tagged while waiting to switch receiver VLAN110 or unmarked packages?  (something to think quickly)

  But the result is if you are still in a stalemate, why not call the Small Business Support Center, the switch is probably still under warranty and telephone support.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  Best regards, Dave

• ESW-520-24 p not able to connect to a Catalyst 3560 G + compatible with SPA942?

  Hi all

  a customer bought an ESW-520-24 p for use in a VoIP project. Today we had difficulties to connect to a switch of 3650 G of catalyst; We tried to set the port to the trunk, general, customer and access and changed all sorts of settings VLAN on the 3560G switch nothing helps: the switches just interconnection used. While sniffing, we saw that the ARP requests are unresponsive even, if something is at a low level, no doubt with VLAN-ing.

  Someone at - it an idea if these switches must be connected between them and if so, what do I do?

  On the other hand; voice turns on VLANS separated and the customer will use SPA942 phones that have an internal switch that allows a PC to connect. I used this call successfully with the Catalyst Express switches and I didn't have to do anything for VLAN-ing, it worked 'out of the box. Can anyone confirm that these phones work with switches for small businesses as well?

  THX!

  Bart

  Hi Bart,.

  I quickly set up the simulation.  It took me more time to write this that actually do the work.

  I grabbed my handy Cisco 3560 catalyst switch.  I plugged port FastEthernet 23 plugged into my UC520.  My Uc520 is my voice system and the DHCP server.

  I have the 24 FastEthernet port connected to my Cisco 3560 in my ESW540 - 24 p.  On 3 of my ESW540 switch port - 24 p, I plugged a phone SPA962...

  I guess that my simulation is close enough to your hardware.  The configuration should be the same I guess.

  Here is the configuration of my Cisco 3560 switch;

  interface FastEthernet0/23

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport autostate exclude

  switchport mode trunk

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/24

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport autostate exclude

  switchport mode trunk

  interface Vlan1

  192.168.10.3 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan100 (VLAN100 ends on my UC520 and has the DHCP scope)

  no ip address

  !

  interface Vlan200

  no ip address

  !

  Check that the tree covering weight is not blocking the ports of uplink with the command show spanning tree. I ask you to try what I must admit that this uplink to my UC520 was in a BLK State on the VLAN by default.  I HAD TO CORRECT.

  I plugged my phone SPA962 on my ESW switch, it lit.

  VLAN 100 as my voice VLAN, I had to set manually what VLAN the SPA phone will reside in.  Otherwise, it will try to retrieve a default IP VLAN.

  • I have manually by pressing the button (below the button of the envelope) on the phone in the SPA
  • Scroll down and select 'network '.
  • Scroll again option VLAN and select Edit.
  • I changed the setting to select Enable VLAN Yes.
  • Click the OK button.
  • I then scroll down to the option VLAN ID.
  • Choose the edit button to change the VLAN ID information
  • I register 100 to and selected OK.

  My phone has received an IP address from my 100 VLAN address 10.1.1.X.

  Fortunately, the ESW520 has a pretty good GUI, in which case you can add a new vlan and the trunk at all ports.

  Here's an example of how I added the vlan 200 to the ESW switch and started adding the Tagged ports switch ports.  I have to do all the ports where you need a VLAN.

  

  I then as seen below my new adds VLAN as a port Tagged to all ports of the switch.

  You can see from my screenshot below I was adding VLAN 200 to interface G2 as labeled interface.

  

  Don't forget NOT to SAVE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS ON BOTH THE 3560 and the ESW520

  

  hope this helps

  Best regards, Dave

• ESW 520 give priority to IP addresses

  I have a LAN with IP addresses for the computers and public, static IP for VoIP phones. They are a hosted VoIP provider, and I want to give priority to the public IPs from my ESW-520-48 per switch How I implemented that in this switch?

  I have no roles assigned on ports and no configuration of VLAN either. I had tried to separate the VLAN first, but eliminated this way. It is once again all VLAN 1 now on the switch. For some reason when I put in place of the 100 VLAN for voice, the voice stopped working on phones, but data were always very good.

  Hi netguy,.

  QOS in rewriting the DSCP (dissociated Services Code Point) address IP phone range by;

  1. create an ACL that specifies the range of IP addresses with mask reverse

  2. attach the ACL on a map of advanced class, then

  3. fix a plan of class to a table of QOS policy that is configured to set a new DSCP value

  4. attach a QOS policy on an interface

  5 but you have a default Advanced QOS configuration already in place, so that should be modified or deleted.

  It is difficult if you have never played with before advanced QOS or understand the latest five statements.

  I guess that your hosted IP phones have DSCP settings (dissociated Services Code Point) already placed on IP phones or the settings that you can set directly on each IP phone?

  If it is possible, why not just move the switch to the basic QOS mode and then say the switch to trust DSCP.

  Well, it's the best thing to do.

  

  

  Best regards, Dave

• ESW 520 8 ports - firmware update

  Hello

  We have an ESW 520 8 ports currently on the 2.1.1.19 firmware version (version of boot 1.0.0.07, VID V01) - serial number CBT15100AN2

  The latest version of the firmware is 2.1.1.21, that we have downloaded and through the Maintenance, update the software, via HTTP, performed an upgrade to this version - upgrade appears to complete, will connect to see success but when we restart the switch it always shows as 2.1.1.19. Very strange!

  Can someone advise please how to get the upgrade to successfully apply?

  Sincere greetings,

  Dale.

  Hi Dale,

  Have you changed the active firmware image to the new version before rebooting? (Maintenance-> file management-> Image Active)

  Best,

  David

  Please evaluate the useful messages and identify the right answers.

• ESW-520-24-K9 supperted SFP

  Hello

  I am interesting is ESW-520-24-K9 support GLC-LH-SM SFP switch?

  There is no information about it in the official record. Some guys there spoke it is supported and I am interesting if it's true?

  I hate the idea of mode single market 9um FPS on a multimodal 50 cable or fiber core 62.5th.

  I've never used, but I guess that if you run SM SFP fibre MM, there may be a way of packaging of cable to allow this coupling.

  Within Cisco, I saw the mention of the use of SM SFP on multimode. I am convinced by this application.

  I personally don't validate FPS of SM running on a cable mm. my colleagues may disagree.

  I look forward to any input to your application to other people on the community.

  What about Dave

• Small businesses-ESW-520-48P-K9

  I need to decide on a few things about this switch before recommending this option to my client. I have the following questions that I need expert advice.

  Questions

  1.) this switch supports POE 15.4 on all 48 10/100 ports (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total nominal power of this switch is only 370W and if it divided with 48 ports, each port can drive only 7W. So therefore the confusion.

  2.) / * style Definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 to 5.4pt 0 to 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; do-size: 10.0pt; do-family: "Times New Roman", "serif" ;} "} The series may be monitored and managed using Ciscoworks LMS ESW?

  3.) MGBSX1 is compatible with GLC-SX-MM

  Thank you.

  
  I need to decide on few things regarding this switch before recommending this switch to my customer. I have the following questions that i need some expert advice.
  Questions
  1.) Does this switch support POE 15.4W on all 48 10/100 ports (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total power rating of this switch is only 370W and if this divided with 48 ports, each port can only drive 7W. So thus the confusion.
  2.) Can the ESW Series be Monitored and Managed using Ciscoworks LMS?
  3.) Is MGBSX1 compatible with GLC-SX-MM
  Thanks.
  
  

  Hello

  Please see the attached document for your queries!

  Hope to help!

  Ganesh.H

  Don't forget to note the useful message

• On the Maximum of Source Ports on a Port Destination ESW 520 24 P

  The ESW 520 24 P does support mirrored 20 Ports traffic at the Port of Destination 1?

  Hi Andy

  Without media ESW mirroring groups each of which can mirror 8 ports to a destination port.

  It is fine for normal problem determination purposes. I can guess your application.

  What about Dave

• ESW-520-8 p-K9 POE capabilities

  Can the ESW-520-8 p-K9 provide enough POE to take in charge 7 PVC2300 cameras?  If not, what are its limits?

  Hello

  The ESW 520 8 ports offers a maximum power of 15.4 to any 10/100 port; Total of 60W.

  The ESW 540 8 ports offers a maximum power of 15.4 to any port 10/100/1000; Total 123W.

  By the PVC2300 datasheet, each camera has a consumption of 10W.

  If you need 7 cameras supported, you can consider the 8-port ESW540. Another option is to power the cameras via the external power adapter, assuming that a power source is nearby.

  I hope this helps.

  Bert Wilhelm

  Solutions of the APW

  Austin, TX

• Assignment of VLANS on catalyst express 520

  Hello

  I ache to configure a switch to catalyst Express 520-8PC. Could it, it is not possible to assign different VLAN than '1' in access to this switch ports? I hope it is possible and I have just found this option again. If this is the case, can we please refernce to some white paper or a guide (or simply explain how and where it should be done)?

  I tried either on the web-fronend and CCA/NAC (unfortunately it isn't all cli support) and not found anywhere in the configuration.

  with greetings

  Nico Schmidt

  Hello

  According to the data sheet, the 500 series supporsts VLAN up to 32.

  Here is the link on how to add/remove a VLAN:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6545/products_configuration_example09186a00806da6c9.shtml#VLANs

  HTH

• Management of VLANS on switches PowerConnect 28XX

  I had already tried the PowerConnect 27XX switches (mainly the 2708), and while it worked very well, he had a very, very frustrating feature: the IP address of management was always assigned to VLAN 1 - there is no way to change this.  I wonder if someone who has the (2708 or 2716) 28XX series could tell me if they have added a way to change the management VLAN, or if the management VLAN is always pasted to the VLAN1?  It is a decisive feature - I can't lose a port on VLAN1 on the switch just to be able to manage, as our current environment uses a VLAN for management.

  Thank you

  Nick

  management of VLANs is always vlan 1 on 28xx switches.

  An option is outwardly loop back one vlan 1 coelio to an access port vlan XX.   This will allow you to manage the switch on any vlan.  Of course, it burns 2 ports, not just 1.  But these switches are inexpensive, so you can have a hard time to find a solution less expensive just to avoid to manage on the vlan 1 or using the hack of the outer loop.

  Note: 28xx executes a single PLEASE, so you will need to disable the STP Protocol on the loop back ports if you go with this hack.

• This should be easy but... VLANS and switches

  I have 2 switches Dell 6224 is in Vlan35 and the other is vlan110 - I have an Ethernet cable connecting a switch to another - the port on the vlan 110 arrives but the port on the vlan 35 does not work - I want to access the vlan switch 110 of vlan 35 - what should I add to my config so that it works?

  Thank you very much

  Eric

  When you need two different VLANS to communicate with each other if you have enabled an L3 device on the network to perform routing. Your 6224 ToR may already setup for VIRTUAL LAN routing. In the config, it will have the command # ip Routing. Then the switch should just an IP address for each VIRTUAL local area network, and can then route between the VLANS.

  Example of possible configuration:

  6224 ToR

  VLAN 1 = 192.168.1.1
  VLAN 35 = 192.168.35.1
  VLAN 110 = 192.168.110.1
  # ip Routing
  # int port-channel 1
  switchport mode trunk #.
  # permit switchport trunk vlan add 35 110

  6220

  VLAN 1 = 192.168.1.2
  VLAN 35 only = no IP address
  VLAN 110 no = no IP address

  port-channel int # 1 (connection to ToR 6224)
  switchport mode trunk #.
  # permit switchport trunk vlan add 35 110

  port-channel int # 2 (connection iSCSI 6224)
  switchport mode access #.
  # switchport access vlan 110

  iSCSI 6224

  VLAN 1 = 192.168.1.3
  VLAN 35 only = no IP address
  VLAN 110 no = no IP address

  port-channel int # 1 (connection to 6220)
  switchport mode access #.
  # switchport access vlan 110

  You can also try to continue in the way of the use of the static routes for everything, I don't know how this will work.

• Config port / VLAN on switch MXL

  I'm not a network engineer, but I try to set a port to my MXL switch to a VLAN that will route traffic on virtual machines on a local network of calculation.

  This is the port Te 0/52 on the back of the MXL and I am running ESXi on servers in my m1000e.  In fact, I have two MXLs in the tissue A of the m1000e configured with VLT via the interfaces of the FourtyGig.  This part has been implemented by people of Dell Tech Services, making the installation.

  Here's what looked like the config to start:

  dsa1 #show vlan

  Codes: *-Default VLAN - VLAN, GVRP, R - G remote control Port Mirroring VLAN, P - primary, C - community, I - isolated
  O Openflow
  Q: U - no identified, the T - tag
  x - unidentified Dot1x, X - Dot1x tag
  o - unidentified OpenFlow, O - OpenFlow tag
  G - GVRP tag, M - Vlan-stack, H - VSN tagged
  i unidentified intern, I - labeled internal, untagged, V v - VLT - VLT tag

  Ports Status Description Q NUM
  * 1 U active Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  U Po41 (Te 0/41-44)
  Te U 0/1-32
  115 active Mgmt T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  486 active VMGuest T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  Te U 0/49-50

  And I wanted to add VLAN 1000 to calculate, so I did the following:

  dsa1 #conf

  dsa1 (conf) #interface Te 0/52
  dsa1 (conf-if-you-0/52) #show config
  !
  interface TenGigabitEthernet 0/52
  no ip address
  MTU 12000
  hybrid portmode
  switchport
  FlowControl rx tx off
  spanning tree rstp edge port bpduguard stop-on-violation
  no downtime

  dsa1 vlan (conf) #interface 1000
  dsa1 (conf-if-vl-1000) #show config
  !
  interface Vlan 1000
  Description information
  name computer
  no ip address
  Tagged TenGigabitEthernet 0/1-32
  Unmarked TenGigabitEthernet 0/52
  no downtime

  VLAN now looks like:

  dsa1 #show vlan

  Codes: *-Default VLAN - VLAN, GVRP, R - G remote control Port Mirroring VLAN, P - primary, C - community, I - isolated
  O Openflow
  Q: U - no identified, the T - tag
  x - unidentified Dot1x, X - Dot1x tag
  o - unidentified OpenFlow, O - OpenFlow tag
  G - GVRP tag, M - Vlan-stack, H - VSN tagged
  i unidentified intern, I - labeled internal, untagged, V v - VLT - VLT tag

  Ports Status Description Q NUM
  * 1 U active Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  U Po41 (Te 0/41-44)
  Te U 0/1-32
  115 active Mgmt T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  486 active VMGuest T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  Te U 0/49-50
  1000 active Compute T Te 0/1-32
  Te U 0/52

  But I wanted to add THAT VLT Po33 tag to the new VLAN because there is in others, not because I really understand what it does.  In my view, it is used for load balancing?  If I label it with the command 'tag Po33' in the config of vlan, out with the status "T" instead of "V".

  Here are the details of the VLT:

  dsa1 #show vlt detail
  Local LAG Id counterpart LAG Id status Local Peer status Active VLAN
  ------------  -----------  ------------  -----------  -------------
  41 41 UP UP 1, 115, 486
  dsa1 #show brief vlt
  VLT area in brief
  ------------------
  Domain ID: 100
  Role: secondary
  Primary role: 4096
  ICL Link Status: to the top
  Status of heart rate: upward
  VLT Peer status: to the top
  The local unit ID: 0
  Version: 6 (4)
  Local system MAC address: f8:b1:56:09:70:b1
  MAC address of the remote system: f8:b1:56:09:70:fd
  Configured the system MAC address: 00:01:00:01:00:01
  Version of the remote system: 6 (4)
  Restore delay timer: 90 seconds
  Delay-restore Abort threshold: 60 seconds
  Routing peer: disabled
  By the peer-routing-Timeout timer: 0 seconds
  Multicast peer-routing timeout: 150 seconds

  So my questions are, I'm on the right track?  It will do what I want it to do is send traffic on port 0/52 Te which is labeled in ESXi with 1000 VLAN?  Should I worry the VLT marking stuff and if yes, how should I do the VLT marking rather than normal marking?

  The connection only 1 port of MXL 1 to a device, this device is considered a switch/host an orphan. A VLT connection will have 1 port each MXL placed in a port channel and connected to a device.

  Here is a good article that covers the VLT in use with different Topologies.

  http://Dell.to/1wfDl3n

  And the User Guide is a good source to have as well.

  http://Dell.to/1Hy70bb

• VLAN with Switch L3 (SG-500)

  Hello

  I would like to know how to configure the VLAN in SG - 500 with its feature of L3 (switch, router).

  The switch is running in L2 mode and has a few hosts connected to him.

  Some questions I have:

  1. If I turn it on to L3 ( set system mode router ) what will happen to him? It will still work as a normal L2 switch as it is now, or I have to change some other configuration? Will be the current hosts?
  2. The switch must L3 run VTP for VLAN?
  3. What happens if the router is not a Cisco router (it's a SonicWALL)?

  Thank you in advance!

  Hi Vlad

  1. If you put the switch on set system router mode, it will default to the switch. Some features of strict l2 will disappear while some features of l3 will appear.

  2. the switch does not support construction

  3. the router isn't little matter, layer 3 is 3. Subnets, IP addresses and routes. Somethings are easier, but nothing is basically capable of doing.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Are there plans for the new ESW 500 models switch with PoE capability?

  I know that current models of ESW 500 switch don't have enough capacity to power all the switchports to 15.4, even if the ESW-540-8 p model has almost enough capacity to power all the switchports to 15.4.

  Reasons why new ESW 500 switch with PoE capacity are necessary:

  • The existing PoE 500 ESW switches have not always enough when these devices are deployed with the UC500:
    • 7945, 7965 and 797 x phones
    • series phones (not yet supported with the SBCS solution) 9900 and 8900
    • PVC2300 Surveillance Cameras
    • AP541N access points
  • The UC560 comes with all the PoE ports and requires at least an ESW switch be deployed
  • Version 48 ports gigabit switch ESW is currently available only in the version not PoE, and we need a version of 48 gigabit ports for users of the UC560 solution.

  Existing ESW 500 switch PoE capabilities are:

  • ESW-520-8 P: 60W
  • ESW-540-8 P: 120W
  • ESW-520-24 P: 180W
  • ESW-540-48P: 380W
  • ESW-540-24 P: 280W

  PoE of ESW 500 switch capabilities supporting 15.4 full power on all PoE PoE ports are:

  • 8 port: 123.2W
  • 24 port: 369.6W
  • 48 port: 739.2W

  Are there plans to release the new ESW 500 switch models increased capacity, enough to supply the full 15.4 to all PoE ports with PoE?

  Hi John - Thank you for your participation in the small community of business support. I talked to our switch product manager and want to share his response.

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style - qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 to 5.4pt 0 to 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; do-size: 10.0pt; do-family: "Times New Roman", "serif" ;} "}

  We have taken the conscious decision to deliver PoE as ESW and other switches for small businesses for several reasons:

  • Endpoints PoE more attract a lot less than the 15.4 W maximum power. Most IP phones are below the range of 7W.
  • A typical deployment would most PoE devices connect to a switch.
  • For these reasons, the ESW is not burdened cost with the PoE feature which would not be used most of the time.
  • All ports are still able to PoE you can connect up to 24 devices PoE Switch 24 ports to any point in time, as long as the handset is in the title of the budget.
  • Therefore, given that these products are intended for small business and the price is an important factor, we opted for this approach.

  We do not have a product at full power on all ports in the Cisco Small Business portfolio, except in the arena of 8 channels. Within Cisco, Cisco Catalyst products support this today.

  Thanks again for the question,

  Stephanie Reaves

  Cisco Small Business