Exchange 2003 Auto supply: IOM

I'm trying to configure a user for exchange 2003. I use Windows 2003. I can create an exchange successfully through IOM account if I have available manually.

I created 2 strategies to access, one for the AD and the other for Exchange (priority 1 and 2). They are all two supposed to automatically provision a user in AD/Exchange as soon as the account is created in the IOM. Account AD gets provisioned successfully.

However, the Exchange 2003 account is given rejected status on check user AD process. Then I tried to set the value based on Exchange resource object to the user AD via the console. Now, it gives me a wait status and never actually creates the mailbox.

Help!

Something to this effect has been set in one of the beams of the patch later to IOM 9.1

Tags: Fusion Middleware

Similar Questions

  • Migration of interns of exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud Exchange

    Hello

    I need help migrate my internal data from Exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud. It's my first time

    the display, if more information is needed please let me know. I bought Office 365 with Exchange for my client.

    Server - SBS2003

    Customers - Office 2007 and 2010

    Thank you

    Ty

    Hello

    Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

    I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

    And here:

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

    See you soon.

  • Exchange 2003 Migration to Office365 with SSO

    Hi all

    Merry Christmas to start!

    I work for a company that run Exchange 2003. We plan to do a migration to Office365 and I am researching on the best solution.

    I am aware that there are three main options available, hybrid/intermediary/putting in service.

    My instincts suggest that the best option would be to complete the migration using the staging process, but I think that if I take this route I can't implement single sign on? This is the case...

    If so, is this means to ensure single sign-on can be used, then I can only implement a hybrid solution?

    Hello

    And a Merry Christmas to you, too.

    Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

    Please repost your Question in Exchange for TechNet Forums.

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

    See you soon.

  • SBS 2003 migrating exchange 2003 to exchange 2010

    Hello

    It is possible o migrate from exchange 2003 on SBS 2003 to new windows server 2012 STD with exchange 2010, but does not move the FSMO rules to windows 2012? I can't downgrade SBS 2003 because I have an application that cannot be migrated from Small Business SERVER 2003.

    Best regards

    Marcio Moreira

    Try asking in Exchange Server Forums:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?category=exchangeserve

  • How can I restore and old information store (Exchange 2003) to my Exchange Server existing (Exchange 2010)

    Nice day

    3 months ago I installed Exchange Server 2010, now I need to recover a mailbox from a backup. The backup was performed while he was still Exchange 2003. I want to know is you can restore an old Exchange 2003 database in the Exchange 2010 recovery store, and if so what is the way forward. PS I use symantec backup exec 2010 R3 as backup software.

    If it is not possible, is there any other way to retrieve mailbox information

    Any help will be much appreciated.

    Hello Wh@pd@p,

    I suggest posting your question on our forums TechNet for Microsoft Exchange Server, located here again:
  • How to switch my domain server 2003 & exchange 2003 Server

    I have Windows 2003 Server domain with exchange 2003 server running on the same machine, I want to improve my server domain to Windows server 2008, both my exchange to Exchange Server 2007 server, tell me the procedure, if I upgrade my server exchange server or domain first. What are the steps to do this.

    Support is located in the Windows Server Forums:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

    Support is found in the Exchange Server forums:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer/

  • Exchange 2003 with clusters

    Hello

    I'm new with Exchange 2003 cluster environment in our Organization, we have a network that will make all activity the network down, then after 12 to 14 hours. Network will rise

    Our Exchange is configured in the cluster with call tool Symantec Enterprise vault archiving environment, we also have the ANTI-SPAM called Sonic Wall filter

    I just wanted to know what kind of care I have to take before and after the network outage?

    Your suggestion of all will be of great help for me

    Kind regards

    Patricia

    Hello SwapnilJain27,

    It would be better to post in the forum of Exchange Server.

    You can find the category that fits your question below:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

    Thank you!

  • Exchange 2003 Server kept receiving unknown Email sending out through SMTP and the paper jam in the queue folder

    Hello Sir,

    I have a problem with one of my SBS Exchange 2003 servers.

    At first, I was getting a lot of 3008 errors for a non-delivery report with a status code of 5.0.0 was generated for recipient rfc822; address email is removed from the privacy * all these repeated error messages from the event log, SMTP and Exchange Routing service...

    I looked around and discovered more than 10000 .eml in my x:\program files\exchsrv\mailroot\queue folder.  At first, I thought that my server or one of my workstations was compromised, but all workstations have local antiviral software (symantec endpoint protection), my server software also has antiviral and I have a mail server antivirus (symantec endpoint protection).  I scanned all of the computers on the network and even tried almost all of them closing to see if new entries have been created in the queue.

    Unfortunately, more than entries kept by appearing so I kept looking.  By opening one of the .eml, I discovered my own responsibility that I attach to outgoing emails if I have my server acted as a mail relay.  I checked for this and I have been clean.  I kept searching in the .eml and discovered different origins IPs of the Internet.  Am I right to assume that my mail server is BOMBED or attacked with emails with false return addresses and my mail server sends return NDR for spammers/compromised machines on the net?  I tried to stop the exchange services and tried to rename the vsi file 1 to something else as one of the suggested MSKB, but the file was protected.  How can I stop this, it's slowing down my mail server and fill out my HD.  I can't block the IP to shippers because it comes from everywhere.  Help!  There are about 2 to 5 new .eml created every minute!

    TKS and best regards,

    LT

    Hi Lennet,

    Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the forum TechNet for assistance:

    Microsoft Exchange Server

    Hope the helps of information.

  • Exchange 2003 migration to Exchange 2010

    Dear Sir/Madam

    I have a partner who has a parent and a child domain, it has exchange 2003 is installed in the child domain.

    He wonders if he can install exchange 2010 in the partner area & migrate all the exchange 2003 from the child domain in the newly installed exchange 2010 in the area of the partner.

    Please repost your request in one of the most appropriate Microsoft Exchange Forums.  Thank you!

  • What is the tone server scenario in exchange 2003 server

    What is your server Dáil in exchange 2003

    Hello

    The question you have posted is related to Exchange Server 2003 and would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the best support.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/exchangesvravailabilityandisasterrecovery/threads

    Amrita M

    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • Outlook 2007 is limitation of message size, although there is no restriction of message on the Exchange 2003 server.

    When one of my users trying to reach a 50 MB file to an e-mail message, Outlook 2007 immediately appears with the following message: the attachment size exceeds the allowable limit.  The user is not even allowed to attach the file such as Outlook it immediately blocked.  We have a 10 MB limit for messages that leave the organization.  This user has attempted to send the file to another Member of our Organization. In Outlook 2003, we are able to send 50 MB files to another without problem. Does anyone have any suggestions? I wonder if there is a setting in Outlook 07 which limits the size of an attachment. The confusing part is that he was not yet able to attach the file.

    OS: XP Pro 64-bit
    Suite Office 2007
    Exchange 2003

    Thank you!

    Hello

    1 you need to set the maxRequestLength value in the web.config file to a value greater than 50 MB. The maxRequestLength value in the web.config file is a parameter ASP.NET prevents applications greater than a certain length that has been added to prevent DOS attacks. He is set to 30 MB by default and must be increased in order to send attachments more than 30 MB. This could also be declined to enforce a lower limit.

    2. you need to increase the MaxSubmitMessageSize which is a property of the mailbox of readonly (MaxSubmitMessageSize = 0x666D0003) and this is where we reach the limit of 10 MB.

    It is read from the following locations:

    1. First reading of the object the user mailbox
    2. If not found as indicated by "unlimited", Transport Settings Container
    3. If not found as indicated by "unlimited", Org (read default Org container) container

    To set the value, use the following tasks in the Exchange Management Shell:

    1 set-transportconfig MaxSendSize (this is KBS) and then assign 51200 for 50 MB attachments. This will put it to all users

    Or

    2 set-mailbox and set the MaxSendSize (this is KBS) to 51 200 for attachments of 50 MB forspecific to a set of users.

    Once you set or the other, you must recycle store or not access to the mailbox for 15-20 minutes (to allow to store the cache expire) so that the change in size to have effect. In addition, the property is stored in AD and submitted to replication delays.

    One last thing that you should be aware of (sorry, the list will just):

    We have a timeout of 60 minutes for any attachment request or download attachment query (in OWA basic and Premium). So if you try to download an attachment 50 MB on a 56 Kbps connection, you will then expire and get a HttpWebException (e.g., the max upload is about 25 MB on a 56 Kbps connection).

    So, to sum up, there are two keys to send a large attachment:

    1 ASP.NET change web.config settings.

    2 modify the MaxSendSize using the set-TransportConfig (for all users) or Set-Mailbox for individual users.

    And you must

    3 ensure that the total download time will be less than 60 minutes (depending on your size and the speed of your network link)

    The web.config change is immediate, but the MaxSendSize change takes time, because of the caching strategy (the letter box, DSAccess deadlines and delays in replication cache).

    Examples:

    Changes to Web.Config

    By default, web.config under OWA virtual directory (Microsoft\Exchange Server\ClientAccess\Owa) will have the following entry (by default, the maximum request size is about 30 MB):

    ....

    Change to where X is the value you want in KBs. 50 MB, X will be of approximately50000

    Change the size limit of messages by user

    Go in the Exchange Management Shell and type the following command:

    Set-mailbox - id: "username" - MaxSendSize:50000

    Where "username" is the identity of the mailbox. This will set the limit to send message to about 50 MB. You need to restart the store to see the effect immediately.

    Change the size limit for messages of all users

    Go in the Exchange Management Shell and type the following command:

    -Set-transportconfig MaxSendSize: 50000

    This will set the limit to send message to about 50 MB. You need to restart the store to see the effect immediately.

  • Problem syncing blackBerry Z10 Z10 Exchange 2003

    Z10 os 10.2.1.537 - exchange 2003 / outlook 2010 (cached mode)

    When I open outlook 2010 on my pc, the new messages are syncronised well from exchange. After my Z10 E-mail properly synchronized. When I close my pc outlook and I get out of my office, my Z10 stop to sync email until I return back and restart outlook.

    With a BB os7, everything works fine.

    solved!

    the problem is McAfee Groupshield for Exchange server.

    Must enable proactive analysis on e-mail file to correctly enable connections from Iphone/Android/BB smart os10, after the closure of the station of office outlook.

  • Unity 4.0 (2) and /ForestPrep for Exchange 2003

    We plan to upgrade our Active Directory in Windows Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003 AD network. We currently have two unit 4.0 (2) servers (Unified Messaging) in two separate locations, each serving a different group of offices. All in all, we have more than 1,000 users in 5 different locations. All these users and locations upgrade to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and unity 4.0 (4) at the same time is not an option. Therefore, we would gradually migrate each location to Exchange 2003, Windows 2003 and unity 4.0 (4).

    I understand that unity 4.0 (4) is the recommended version to use with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003, but I've also read in Cisco documentation as 4.0 (4) unit when running on Windows 2003 requires that you are already running Exchange 2003. What confronts a dilemma in that we have separate locations of mutiple supported by one server shared unity and we simply cannot risk all these sites simultaneously to unity 4.0 upgrade (4), Server 2003, and Exchange 2003. So, what would be the best strategy to go where we want to be? This brings me to the following questions:

    a. If we run / Exchange 2003 ForestPrep against our field now even if we are always unity 4.0 (2)?

    b. can we begin to introduce Exchange 2003 servers in each of our branches (administrative groups & routing Exchange) while staying at unity 4.0 (2) provided that these servers are not designated as a partner of unity and without voice mail server or connectors of the unit (for example, unity voice bridge connector) are on these servers?

    c. would make sense to upgrade the servers of the 4.0 unit (3) first and then move to unity 4.0 (4) once all the Exchange servers in all our branches have been improved in Server 2003 and Exchange 2003? This interim update seems to give us more flexibility in our path to upgrade its operating system to Microsoft Exchange server version requirements are less onerous

    Windows 2003 is not necessary for the 4.0 unit (4). Likewise, it is not recommended because there is evidence of the way in which Windows 2000 with the unit, but we do support Windows 2003 if the client really wants to use it. We ship the unit on Windows 2000 and that's what we recommend at this time. No functionality is lost under Windows 2000.

    Officially we do not support have all Exchange 2003 servers or even execution of ForestPrep if you have lower than 4.0 (3). That said, the only flaw we've never seen this is when the unit is connected under the local system or when the subscriber accounts are on Exchange 2003 servers. You wouldn't be the first customer to do so and it should be fine but really understand that it is not technically a Cisco tested and taken in charge of the configuration.

    Thank you

    Keith

  • Could not import the user to exchange 2003

    I install MU version 4.0 (4) and when I import the user of the exchange 2003, the alert dialog box informing the message ' unrecognized error 0 x 80041908 occurred, new subscribers was not successfully added. "

    Help me please!

    Unity 4.0 (4) Sr1 has the fix. You can try the following workaround:

    CSCee44191 SA cannot import users when there is a NULL value in fn or ln

    Symptom:

    Import user using the web ITS (System Administrator)

    Console fails with the following error:

    "Unrecognized error 0 x 80041908 has occurred."

    The new customer was not added successfully. »

    Conditions:

    This occurs when any user is null

    value in their fields first name or name.

    Workaround solution:

    Use the CUBI (Cisco Unity bulk import) tool to perform

    import.

  • Exchange 2003 FrontEnd Server Down, Bank of messages of the unit down.

    Hello

    The configuration of the Exchange 2003 environment with 1 Server frontend and backend (cluster) 2 servers. The Exchange FrontEnd server is down due to the problem of relay service. All outlook and exchange related services clients are point directly to the server main exchange. This cause of unity is unable to store voice messages in the exchange store. When subscribers call for unity, system will tell the Bank to the user messages are temporary offline. How re - configure the unit to make it appear the message store? Below is the version of the unit.

    Cisco Unity Version 4.0

    Build number 4.0 (3) SR 1

    Windows Server Version Microsoft Windows 2000 version 2195 (Service Pack 3)

    Pls advise.

    Thanking in advance for your help.

    The guide of reconfiguration:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/voicesw/ps2237/products_upgrade_guides_chapter09186a0080205a7f.html

    Thank you

    Keith

Maybe you are looking for