Exchange 2003 Migration to Office365 with SSO

Similar Questions

• Exchange 2003 migration to Exchange 2010

  Dear Sir/Madam

  I have a partner who has a parent and a child domain, it has exchange 2003 is installed in the child domain.

  He wonders if he can install exchange 2010 in the partner area & migrate all the exchange 2003 from the child domain in the newly installed exchange 2010 in the area of the partner.

  Please repost your request in one of the most appropriate Microsoft Exchange Forums.  Thank you!

• Migration of interns of exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud Exchange

  Hello

  I need help migrate my internal data from Exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud. It's my first time

  the display, if more information is needed please let me know. I bought Office 365 with Exchange for my client.

  Server - SBS2003

  Customers - Office 2007 and 2010

  Thank you

  Ty

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

  And here:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

  See you soon.

• SBS 2003 migrating exchange 2003 to exchange 2010

  Hello

  It is possible o migrate from exchange 2003 on SBS 2003 to new windows server 2012 STD with exchange 2010, but does not move the FSMO rules to windows 2012? I can't downgrade SBS 2003 because I have an application that cannot be migrated from Small Business SERVER 2003.

  Best regards

  Marcio Moreira

  Try asking in Exchange Server Forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?category=exchangeserve

• Exchange Server Migration 2000/2003, unity 4.0 (1) (4)

  We are running Exchange 2000 in an advertisement in 2000 with the 4.0 unit (1).

  Due to some problems with our current Exchange Server, we need to accelerate our migration to Exchange 2003.

  We will be upgrading the schema AD 2003 this week, and planned to upgrade Exchange this weekend. I know this will have a direct impact on the unit even after reading the documents to upgrade, I'm not 100% sure to get a grip on that everything must be done to make this a smooth transition.

  How the migration will work, we will build a new Exchange 2003 server in the same organization, and then move the mailboxes to that server. We then decomission existing exchange server and build another with his namesake and IP address as a Server 2003 and migrate all the mailboxes back, permanently.

  With this double-move in mind, does anyone have any advice, suggestions or traps to help us?

  Thanks in advance.

  Brian

  Running Exchange 2003 ForestPrep causes a REFUSAL of ACE appear in each administrative group for the Exchange domain servers group on the 'Servers' container. Assuming that you are using the security model, the permissions wizard puts in place where the unit connects with a domain account that is not in the Exchange domain servers group, you should be fine. But I very well many customers choose to use a method of security home brew or put users in a bunch of unnecessary groups. So as have done you that ForestPrep does not grief of the unit.

  Unity 4.0 (3) and later supports Exchange 2003. So I would upgrade to 4.0 (4) of the unit before moving to Exchange 2003. Once you're at 4.0 (4) you just need to upgrade to Exchange 2003 Exchange System Manager and run the latest version of the permissions wizard if you plan to run Exchange 2003 with SP1. You can download that here:

  http://www.ciscounitytools.com/App_PW_403.htm

  When you bring the new tipping online server, you must re-run the Configuration Cisco Unity Message Store of add/remove programs and let the unit move the Unity_servername mailbox by choosing a new partner server. You can t just move the mailbox without the cause of the layout of the store Message what unit won t know where to find. Same thing for the what swing you on the new Exchange 2003 server.

  Thank you

  Keith

• ASA WebVPN with SSO on OWA 2010 Exchange

  Hello, I was using WebVPN (clientless) with SSO on Exchange OWA 2003 and it worked very well with these UNIQUE POST authentication settings:

  URL: / * Style Definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabla normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-haut : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-gauche : 0 cm ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;} https:// /exchweb/bin/auth/owaauth.dll

  destination https:///exchange/
  Flags 0

  user domain\\user name / * Style Definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabla normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-haut : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-gauche : 0 cm ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;} CSCO_WEBVPN_USERNAME

  password / * Style Definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabla normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-haut : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-gauche : 0 cm ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;} CSCO_WEBVPN_PASSWORD

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabla normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-haut : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-gauche : 0 cm ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;} SubmitCreds Log + we

  forcedownlevel 0

  trust 0

  Now, I'm trying to do the same thing with OWA 2010 and it doesn't work. I always get an error on the user credentials

  For Exchange 2010, I use these settings:

  URL: https:///owa/auth.owa

  https:///owa/ destination
  Flags 0

  username DOMAIN\CSCO_WEBVPN_USERNAME

  password CSCO_WEBVPN_PASSWORD

  SubmitCreds Log + we

  forcedownlevel 0

  trust 0

  Anyone know how to fix?
  Someone at - it work?

  Any help?

  Thank you

  In this configuration, I had to change to HTTP (associated client). It also works well on HTTPS.

  Download this tool http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/.

  URL: http://internal-mail-server-ip/owa/auth/owaauth.dll

  post parameter:

  destination: http://internal-mail-server-ip/owa/

  flags: 0

  forcedownlevel: 0

  Trust: 0

  username: CSCO_WEBVPN_USERNAME

  password: CSCO_WEBVPN_PASSWORD

  isUtf8: 1

  http://internal-mail-server-ip/owa/auth/owaauth.dll]] >

  http://internal-mail-server-IP/OWA/
  destination

  0
  flags

  0
  forcedownlevel

  0
  Trust

  CSCO_WEBVPN_USERNAME
  username

  CSCO_WEBVPN_PASSWORD
  password

  1
  isUtf8

  Welcome,

  Norbert

  Hope this helps... Please note so useful

• Exchange 2003 with clusters

  Hello

  I'm new with Exchange 2003 cluster environment in our Organization, we have a network that will make all activity the network down, then after 12 to 14 hours. Network will rise

  Our Exchange is configured in the cluster with call tool Symantec Enterprise vault archiving environment, we also have the ANTI-SPAM called Sonic Wall filter

  I just wanted to know what kind of care I have to take before and after the network outage?

  Your suggestion of all will be of great help for me

  Kind regards

  Patricia

  Hello SwapnilJain27,

  It would be better to post in the forum of Exchange Server.

  You can find the category that fits your question below:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

  Thank you!

• Help with unit 4.2 w / Exchange 2003

  the documentation states that when you use W/2003 and Exchange 2003 with the 4.2 than Exchange unit must be charged on a separate box. Is it because of the limitations of the processor, or is there a compatibility issue? For a laboratory facility, and will only have about 10 boxes set up if that makes a difference.

  This is due to the limits of performance. Note this limitation will be removed in unity 5.0, when our default OS became Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003 becomes the default message store. Unity 5.0 will always support Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000.

• Smartphones with Exchange 2003 and BES blackBerry torch

  Our company moves to Telus of Rogers and I am curious to know if I am able to continue to use the Server BES 4.1 existing and Exchange 2003 with new features of torch (existing devices are curves).

  Does anyone do this?

  Thank you

  Rob

  has responded

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/BlackBerry-Enterprise-solution/adding-torch-to-BES-4-1/TD-p/6...

• Best practices for Exchange 2003 with VMWare ESXi 3.5 and iSCSI SAN

  Hello guys,.

  Here's the Q? We have 1 physical Exchange 2003, the HOST of 4 and 1 iSCSI SAN with LUN 3, 1 for data, 1 for VMWare and 1 for SQL, if we're going to virtualize it, I don't know where to put data Exchage and newspapers. I do not think that that is a good practice to put together the data but I do not have another SAN. So, what can I do?

  Thank you.

  We have 813 mailbox.

  I agree with cainics, start an average size and go from there.  I know it's a production mail server and you can not exactly 'play' with the settings because this requires time, but if you do the VM too big, you would have nothing left for other virtual machines.

  I would go 2 vCPU and at least 4 GB of RAM, maybe 8GB.  There must be parameters for the Exchange mailbox 813 and X users # to implement your environments in order to get an idea of the amount of RAM that will be... 4GB seems minimal to me, but 8 GB would probably be better like that.

• Unity 4.0 (2) and /ForestPrep for Exchange 2003

  We plan to upgrade our Active Directory in Windows Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003 AD network. We currently have two unit 4.0 (2) servers (Unified Messaging) in two separate locations, each serving a different group of offices. All in all, we have more than 1,000 users in 5 different locations. All these users and locations upgrade to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and unity 4.0 (4) at the same time is not an option. Therefore, we would gradually migrate each location to Exchange 2003, Windows 2003 and unity 4.0 (4).

  I understand that unity 4.0 (4) is the recommended version to use with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003, but I've also read in Cisco documentation as 4.0 (4) unit when running on Windows 2003 requires that you are already running Exchange 2003. What confronts a dilemma in that we have separate locations of mutiple supported by one server shared unity and we simply cannot risk all these sites simultaneously to unity 4.0 upgrade (4), Server 2003, and Exchange 2003. So, what would be the best strategy to go where we want to be? This brings me to the following questions:

  a. If we run / Exchange 2003 ForestPrep against our field now even if we are always unity 4.0 (2)?

  b. can we begin to introduce Exchange 2003 servers in each of our branches (administrative groups & routing Exchange) while staying at unity 4.0 (2) provided that these servers are not designated as a partner of unity and without voice mail server or connectors of the unit (for example, unity voice bridge connector) are on these servers?

  c. would make sense to upgrade the servers of the 4.0 unit (3) first and then move to unity 4.0 (4) once all the Exchange servers in all our branches have been improved in Server 2003 and Exchange 2003? This interim update seems to give us more flexibility in our path to upgrade its operating system to Microsoft Exchange server version requirements are less onerous

  Windows 2003 is not necessary for the 4.0 unit (4). Likewise, it is not recommended because there is evidence of the way in which Windows 2000 with the unit, but we do support Windows 2003 if the client really wants to use it. We ship the unit on Windows 2000 and that's what we recommend at this time. No functionality is lost under Windows 2000.

  Officially we do not support have all Exchange 2003 servers or even execution of ForestPrep if you have lower than 4.0 (3). That said, the only flaw we've never seen this is when the unit is connected under the local system or when the subscriber accounts are on Exchange 2003 servers. You wouldn't be the first customer to do so and it should be fine but really understand that it is not technically a Cisco tested and taken in charge of the configuration.

  Thank you

  Keith

• Virtualization of Exchange 2003

  We are about to start (finally) virtualization of our systems.  One of these systems is a Standard Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003, using DAS server and serves about 600 boxes mailbox (if users concurrent max would be around 200 users).  Current physical area includes 3 disks, C, D and E.  C is for system D is application/newspapers and E is for banks to information (only 2 - public and private).

  After reading the various articles and best practices I came with a plan.  Could you get it someone please let me know if it is a good idea?

  In a test environment first of all (with DC operation), separated from the production network:

  Plan of P2V is the current physical Exchange box using VMware Converter Standalone.   Each physical disk would be converted to a virtual disk.  It will implement a SAN to shared storage iSCSI.  Thought create LUNS separate D and E drives, just don't know if this is necessary.  All Exchange and protection antiviruss services will be stopped during the P2V.  I tried to make a cold-clone, but don't know if I can due to the fact that we won't have a VMware enterprise license.

  Once that P2V is complete, power to the top of the new virtual machine.  Remove any vendor (HP Insight) specific applications and drivers.  Then, start the Exchange services and test.

  If successul, process document, repeat the test and before you run on the production system.  Once final, production VM is created, physical stop and turn on VM again.

  If you're ok with the unsupportability of the solution, then I say go ahead and virtualize it.  I still believe that deploying a new server and migrate the mailboxes are the cleanest way to do but to understand the limitations it.  All the more that I would recommend if you could back migration to Exchange 2010 rather than another server in 2003.  There is no direct upgrade from Exchange 2003 to 2013 path so you will need to go to Exchange 2010 in a first time in any case.  Might as well get ready now.

  Migration is easier because then you're not taking all issues with the server of your virtual infrastructure.  It is also pointless to worry about uninstalling the hardware drivers, of unnecessary software, etc.

  I had some success with P2V migration running on Exchange servers.  As I said earlier, you will have the best chance of success if you can organize the downtime to stop all of the Exchange during the P2V services.  That's how I managed in the past.

  Do your homework and understand what works best for you.  I'm sure you can succeed with two approaches.

  Good luck!  Feel free to come back and post how things went or if you need any help.

  Matt

  http://www.thelowercasew.com

• Exchange 2003 / 2010 on vshpere foundation 4.1

  We are a small organization with 60 mailboxes on a physical server to Exchange 2003.  My VMWare environment consists of 710 2-Dell servers with 32 GB of ram and vmfs volume unique raid 10 on each server.  There is no SAN and this seems to serve us well, even if a San would make things like Vmotion and HA as possible, that's what we have at the moment.

  Ideally I would like to move the exchange Server 2003 on a VM host and continue to use this platform for another year or two, but there seems to be problems of performance that are best addressed in the 2010 version.

  Would it not possible to run Exchange 2003 on one of my servers host with the VMFS volume shared using storage for databases and log files?   What I do need to provide some physical drives dedicated for exchange databases, or is there any recommended configuration: for the virtual drives for a small exchange on VMWare Server?

  Jim

  From a disk I / IO perspective if you have only 60 users, I don't think that you will have problems even if you use Outlook in Mode online (as opposed to the Cached Mode).  In addition, there are a few things you should think about to / consider:

  (1) Exchange 2003 is not supported in a machine virtual on a hypervisor/platform. You can't get support from Microsoft if you are running Exchange 2003 in a VM on vSphere, Hyper-V, whatever it is.  I've had clients essentially turned almost immediately without even best effort support for Microsoft.  I'm not sure of the importance of technical support Microsoft for you, but for many of my clients, the risk is not worth...  Customers choose to migrate to Exchange 2010 (or 2007 for years before) that supports virtualization complete.

  Microsoft has created the program (SVVP) Validation of virtualization server to validate their applications running on virtual machines on multiple platforms.  I would check that out to see exactly what is and is not supported all the way back to Exchange 5.5 If you can believe it.

  http://www.windowsservercatalog.com/SVVP.aspx?svvppage=svvpwizard.htm

  (2) Exchange 2010 offers big improvements over Exchange 2003 in more than a reduction of inputs and outputs.  There are so many new features of the product that it is useful to consider migrating directly to Exchange 2010.

  If you really want to virtualize it, I would follow advice from design even for physical Exchange 2003 servers.  You don't need the physical disks dedicated to the database/log, but you may want dedicated virtual disks for easy management.  In addition, you can just follow normal recommended or even existing P2V your Exchange Server.

  So to sum up - Yes you can virtualize Exchange 2003 and as small as your environment, it should run perfectly, but it is not supported by Microsoft.  I would consider an upgrade to Exchange 2010 as preferred approach if possible.

  Matt

  http://www.thelowercasew.com

• How to switch my domain server 2003 & exchange 2003 Server

  I have Windows 2003 Server domain with exchange 2003 server running on the same machine, I want to improve my server domain to Windows server 2008, both my exchange to Exchange Server 2007 server, tell me the procedure, if I upgrade my server exchange server or domain first. What are the steps to do this.

  Support is located in the Windows Server Forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

  Support is found in the Exchange Server forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer/

• Exchange 2003 Server kept receiving unknown Email sending out through SMTP and the paper jam in the queue folder

  Hello Sir,

  I have a problem with one of my SBS Exchange 2003 servers.

  At first, I was getting a lot of 3008 errors for a non-delivery report with a status code of 5.0.0 was generated for recipient rfc822; address email is removed from the privacy * all these repeated error messages from the event log, SMTP and Exchange Routing service...

  I looked around and discovered more than 10000 .eml in my x:\program files\exchsrv\mailroot\queue folder.  At first, I thought that my server or one of my workstations was compromised, but all workstations have local antiviral software (symantec endpoint protection), my server software also has antiviral and I have a mail server antivirus (symantec endpoint protection).  I scanned all of the computers on the network and even tried almost all of them closing to see if new entries have been created in the queue.

  Unfortunately, more than entries kept by appearing so I kept looking.  By opening one of the .eml, I discovered my own responsibility that I attach to outgoing emails if I have my server acted as a mail relay.  I checked for this and I have been clean.  I kept searching in the .eml and discovered different origins IPs of the Internet.  Am I right to assume that my mail server is BOMBED or attacked with emails with false return addresses and my mail server sends return NDR for spammers/compromised machines on the net?  I tried to stop the exchange services and tried to rename the vsi file 1 to something else as one of the suggested MSKB, but the file was protected.  How can I stop this, it's slowing down my mail server and fill out my HD.  I can't block the IP to shippers because it comes from everywhere.  Help!  There are about 2 to 5 new .eml created every minute!

  TKS and best regards,

  LT

  Hi Lennet,

  Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the forum TechNet for assistance:

  Microsoft Exchange Server

  Hope the helps of information.