Exhibitor/index in the Notes?

I use Notes in El Capitan for course notes which involve mathematical equations.

Is there a quick way to get (i.e. x-squared) exhibitors and clues?

Hi Frank

You can create your own keyboard shortcuts for the exhibitor and clues, and almost any other item of Menu. You can do for "any Application" or a specific Application such as Notes.

Go to System Preferences > keyboard > App Shortcuts (left column) > shortcuts (tab)

Click on the icon "+" near the bottom; then in top pop up choose Applications or scroll down to 'Notes' If you select a single application it is the shortcut will be applied to.

You must use the lettering exactly as it appears in the Menu. Notes Super/index located in the Format > font > Baseline > XX

In the field type of the title of the Menu "Exhibitor" (without the quotes) click the hotkey field and type what you want to use as a shortcut.

Pages use Ctrl + cmmd += this. (Attention: you want to use unique not already used shortcuts; or use the shortcut as well as other applications.)

Click Add

Now do the same for 'index '.

Add your shortcut (Pages use Ctrl + cmmd + - (less)) you can use any combo not used by other applications or if you want only for Notes.

Click on Add.

Now you have the shortcuts instant keyboard.

There is also an excellent free app called "cheating" which will show you all the keyboard shortcuts for which window you are in pressing cmmd for a few seconds. This will include everything that you create. Link... https://www.mediaatelier.com/cheatsheet/

You can also use the tab 'Text' shortcuts to create text expansions.

Hope this helps, Greg

Tags: Mac OS & System Software

Similar Questions

display the index in the notes not available

display the index in the notes not available

explain

TOC problem, dots and page due to the exhibitor/index number

I have a few titles in my book ends with a character exponent or index. When I create the table of contents, points (tab) and the page number for these titles are written in address/subscription.
I tried to create a syle of specificity for the character of the exhibitor/index, but these are inherited in the table of contents.
I also tried to break the link to the style, specific character, however, the problem is that the entire title lost its reference to style and is not printed in the table of contents.

We solved this problem in configureing the paragraph style that we used to tab (points) and the number in the table of contents to have only the Normal Position. This way we had set up every title that has the subscription.

Indexing of the options does not not - Dll common shell Windows does not

Hello

I can't open the indexing options. It stucks at "awaiting to receive the status of indexing. the error is "Windows Shell common Dll is not responding.

I tried the fix (support.microsoft.com/mats/windows_search/). And create a new account. And SFC. But nothing does work.

You have a solution?

Thank you.

Hi ATMT

Thanks for posting in the Microsoft Community.

I understand that you are facing the issue with indexing options does not and the Windows Shell common Dll message error message does not.

Method 1:

I suggest you run the fixit tool and check.

Difficulty of Windows Desktop Search when it hangs or no display of results

http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/windows_search/en-us

Method 2:

I suggest you perform the clean boot and check.

Place the computer in a clean boot state, then check if it helps. You can start Windows by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot". A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

Note: When you are finished troubleshooting, follow step 3 in the article to start on normal startup.

Method 3:

I also suggest you to see the links and check.

You can also check the below mentioned links.

http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/open-the-search-and-indexing-Troubleshooter

Change advanced indexing options

http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/change-advanced-indexing-options

Improve Windows searches using the index: frequently asked questions

http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/improve-Windows-searches-using-the-index-frequently-asked-questions

What is the difference between primary key and unique indexes with forced not null?

Primary key is = unique index + not null?

The short answer is Yes.

However, even if the primary key, applying both uniquness and not null, there is a notion of "special".

You can only have one primary key in tables, but you can have multiple unique indexes and constraints not null.

See: https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:8743855576462

Appearing only index page is not in the Google search

Hello
I designed a site earlier in Muse and recently did a search on google for it. I noticed that the index page is not appear in the list of Google search and instead the second page showed so when you go to the site, the first page you come to is not the Home Page. I just update of certain content on the site and exported all of the FTP site. I have reset my Cache but it always shows the second page. Is there something that I am missing? I don't think that happened initially after the construction of the site. Perhaps something has gone wrong with the coding?
If you know solutions to this, please let me know.
Thank you
Catherine

I guess that the question had something to do with your sitemap. There are a lot of SEO articles that you can reference to help.

Index of URLS in a Sitemap - custom search help

https://blog.kissmetrics.com/get-Google-to-index/

create indexes on the upper part of the column - reminders function is not deterministic

Hi all

I'm having a problem on a database. When you create an index on an existing table on the upper part of a column, Oracle triggers an ORA-30553. I've done this 40 index other databases, with the same and different versions, without problem. When you create the index on a copy of the table, it is created with success...

Here is the code:

SQL > select * from v version $;

BANNER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oracle Database 11 g Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production

PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

CORE Production 11.2.0.3.0

AMT for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

SQL > CREATE INDEX IDX_SRE_E_MAIL_UPPER on fsynrelatie (upper (sre_e_mail)) tablespace idx;

CREATE the INDEX IDX_SRE_E_MAIL_UPPER on idx tablespace fsynrelatie (upper (sre_e_mail))

ERROR on line 1:

ORA-30553: the function is not deterministic

SQL > create table fsynrelatie2 in select * from fsynrelatie;

Table created.

SQL > CREATE INDEX IDX_SRE_E_MAIL_UPPER on fsynrelatie2 (upper (sre_e_mail)) tablespace idx;

The index is created.

SQL > drop table fsynrelatie2;

Deleted table.

SQL > show parameter query_rewrite_enabled

VALUE OF TYPE NAME

------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------

query_rewrite_enabled string TRUE

Hi all

Thank you for the answers. I found the problem:

On the table, there are 54 index:

Select index_type, uniqueness, count (*) from user_indexes where table_name = 'FSYNRELATIE '.

Index_type group, uniqueness

INDEX_TYPE	SINGLE CHARACTER	*COUNT ()**
FIELD	ARE NOT UNIQUE	1
BASED ON A NORMAL FUNCTION	ARE NOT UNIQUE	4
NORMAL	UNIQUE	3
NORMAL	ARE NOT UNIQUE	46

3 unique indexes are the primary key and 2 another witch number field contains unique identifiers for rows in other systems. The domain index is an index of Oracle text on a couple of fields. There are 3 indices of function based on a high on a field and 1 on an individual function. This last clue has caused the problem. Apparently, on the creation, this function is deterministic, but when rolling a new version of the software. It became a non-deterministic function. When I delete the index, my original index on upper (sre_e_mail) has been created successfully! Now, I did the deterministic function again and could recreate the function without problem.

Thanks for your comments!

The index used is not in the group by.

Here's the scenario with examples. The big table 333 to 500 million in the table rows. Statistics are collected. Are there histograms. Index is not however be used. Why?

  CREATE TABLE "XXFOCUS"."some_huge_data_table" 
   (  "ORG_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE, 
  "PARTNERID" VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL ENABLE, 
  "EDI_END_DATE" DATE NOT NULL ENABLE, 
  "CUSTOMER_ITEM_NUMBER" VARCHAR2(50) NOT NULL ENABLE, 
  "STORE_NUMBER" VARCHAR2(10) NOT NULL ENABLE, 
  "EDI_START_DATE" DATE, 
  "QTY_SOLD_UNIT" NUMBER(7,0), 
  "QTY_ON_ORDER_UNIT" NUMBER(7,0), 
  "QTY_ON_ORDER_AMT" NUMBER(10,2), 
  "QTY_ON_HAND_AMT" NUMBER(10,2), 
  "QTY_ON_HAND_UNIT" NUMBER(7,0), 
  "QTY_SOLD_AMT" NUMBER(10,2), 
  "QTY_RECEIVED_UNIT" NUMBER(7,0), 
  "QTY_RECEIVED_AMT" NUMBER(10,2), 
  "QTY_REQUISITION_RDC_UNIT" NUMBER(7,0), 
     "QTY_REQUISITION_RDC_AMT" NUMBER(10,2), 
     "QTY_REQUISITION_RCVD_UNIT" NUMBER(7,0), 
     "QTY_REQUISITION_RCVD_AMT" NUMBER(10,2), 
     "INSERTED_DATE" DATE, 
     "UPDATED_DATE" DATE, 
     "CUSTOMER_WEEK" NUMBER, 
     "CUSTOMER_MONTH" NUMBER, 
     "CUSTOMER_QUARTER" NUMBER, 
     "CUSTOMER_YEAR" NUMBER, 
     "CUSTOMER_ID" NUMBER, 
     "MONTH_NAME" VARCHAR2(3), 
     "ORG_WEEK" NUMBER, 
     "ORG_MONTH" NUMBER, 
     "ORG_QUARTER" NUMBER, 
     "ORG_YEAR" NUMBER, 
     "SITE_ID" NUMBER, 
     "ITEM_ID" NUMBER, 
     "ITEM_COST" NUMBER, 
     "UNIT_PRICE" NUMBER, 
      CONSTRAINT "some_huge_data_table_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("ORG_ID", "PARTNERID", "EDI_END_DATE", "CUSTOMER_ITEM_NUMBER", "STORE_NUMBER")
  USING INDEX TABLESPACE "xxxxx"  ENABLE, 
      CONSTRAINT "some_huge_data_table_CK_START_DATE" CHECK (edi_end_date - edi_start_date = 6) ENABLE
   );

SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.2.0 Production on Fri Sep 14 12:11:16 2012

Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle.  All rights reserved.


Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options

SQL> SELECT num_rows FROM user_tables s WHERE s.table_name = 'some_huge_data_table';

  NUM_ROWS                                                                      
----------                                                                      
 333338434                                                                      

SQL> SELECT MAX(edi_end_date)
  2    FROM some_huge_data_table p
  3   WHERE p.org_id = some_number
  4     AND p.partnerid = 'some_string';

MAX(EDI_E                                                                       
---------                                                                       
13-MAY-12                                                                       

Elapsed: 00:00:00.00


SQL> explain plan for
  2  SELECT MAX(edi_end_date)
  3    FROM some_huge_data_table p
  4   WHERE p.org_id = some_number
  5     AND p.partnerid = 'some_string';

Explained.

SQL> /

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT                                                                                   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2104157595                                                                         
                                                                                                    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------        
| Id  | Operation                    | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |        
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------        
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |     1 |    22 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |        
|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE              |             |     1 |    22 |            |          |        
|   2 |   FIRST ROW                  |             |     1 |    22 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |        
|*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX)| some_huge_data_table_PK |     1 |    22 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |        
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------        

SQL> explain plan for
  2  SELECT MAX(edi_end_date),
  3         org_id,
  4         partnerid
  5    FROM some_huge_data_table
  6   GROUP BY org_id,
  7            partnerid;

Explained.

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT                                                                                   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3950336305                                                                         
                                                                                                    
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------                     
| Id  | Operation          | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |                     
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------                     
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |          |     2 |    44 |  1605K  (1)| 05:21:03 |                     
|   1 |  HASH GROUP BY     |          |     2 |    44 |  1605K  (1)| 05:21:03 |                     
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| some_huge_data_table |   333M|  6993M|  1592K  (1)| 05:18:33 |                     
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why is he would not use the index in the group by? If I write a loop to search for different partnerid (there are only three), things together takes less than a second. Any help is appreciated.

BTW, I too gave the index indicator. Did not work. Version mentioned in the example.

Published by: RPuttagunta on September 14, 2012 11:24

Published by: RPuttagunta on September 14, 2012 11:26

the actual names are 'cleaned' for obvious reasons. Don't worry, I don't have the name of the tables in different cases.

RPuttagunta wrote:

Looks like either I called index_ss asked Jonathan a bad indicator, or, I don't know if he used the 'skip scan ".

You don't specify correctly, it should be: index_ss (table_alias) or index_ss (table_alias index_name) or index_ss (table_alias (list of columns to index)).

But I just tried a quick test on 11.2.0.3, and he does not have what we would really like to do.

Concerning
Jonathan Lewis

Find indexes in the schema that are not used
Hello
Anyone know an easy way to SQL or EM to find all indexes that are not used (not accessed) in a schema?
Greetings

Published by: user552215 on January 26, 2012 04:15
Salvation;

Please see:

Identify unused indexes [ID 144070.1]
Identify unused indexes with the ALTER INDEX TRACKING controls [ID 136642.1]

Respect of
HELIOS

Index of the question - do not include the cost
Hello

I have a table of 112mil lines that I copied to a new tablespace, which worked well
I am so adding indexes to the copied table, but gets enormous costs in plans by trying to make a request using the new index, similar to quirying the original table/index

First of all I tired to change my main index to an another initial tablespace more great extension, and even if I remove all cela and put it in the table space as well as the original index and created the same way, I get the same huge difference.

In most om my system this will cause queries that the CBO does not use the index, and applications get very slow. If I do a simple select statement, and the index is selected, even if the cost is enormous, the moment of the actual query is the same as the original table/query. I can't get the cost of the change index by trying different dbms_stats.gather_index_stats settings

Can someone tell me why this new index comes up with such a huge cost, and what I can do to lower the cost, so that the index gets actually chosen?

Here is some basic information:

It's about Oracle 10 g 2 (10.2.0.4) EA

The simplified create statement for the original and the new index:

CREATE INDEX IDX_POS_DATE ON FMC_POS
("UTC_DATE' DESC, FMC_LOGVES_ID)

CREATE the INDEX IDX_POS_DATE_P2 on FMC_POS_p2
("UTC_DATE' DESC, FMC_LOGVES_ID)

The two indices in dba_indexes:

Source language:
OWNER: VTRACK
INDEX_NAME: IDX_POS_DATE
INDEX_TYPE: BASED ON A NORMAL FUNCTION
TABLE_OWNER: VTRACK
TABLE_NAME: FMC_POS
TABLE_TYPE: TABLE
UNIQUENESS: NO SINGLE
COMPRESSION: DISABLED
PREFIX_LENGTH:
NOM_TABLESPACE: USERS
INI_TRANS: 2
MAX_TRANS: 255
INITIAL_EXTENT: 65536
NEXT_EXTENT:
MIN_EXTENTS: 1
MAX_EXTENTS: 2147483645
PCT_INCREASE:
PCT_THRESHOLD:
INCLUDE_COLUMN:
FREELISTS:
FREELIST_GROUPS:
PCT_FREE: 10
LOGGING: YES
BLEVEL: 3
LEAF_BLOCKS: 439239
DISTINCT_KEYS: 108849202
AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY: 1
AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY: 1
CLUSTERING_FACTOR: 79021005
STATUS: VALID
NUM_ROWS: 110950137
SAMPLE_SIZE: 2177632
LAST_ANALYZED: 05/09/2011 23:38:15
DEGREE: 1
INSTANCES: 1
PARTITIONED: NO.
TEMPORARY: N
GENERATED: N
SCHOOL: N
USER_TABLES: DEFAULT
USER_STATS: NO.
DURATION:
PCT_DIRECT_ACCESS:
ITYP_OWNER:
ITYP_NAME:
PARAMETERS:
GLOBAL_STATS: YES
DOMIDX_STATUS:
DOMIDX_OPSTATUS:
FUNCIDX_STATUS: ENABLED
JOIN_INDEX: NO.
IOT_REDUNDANT_PKEY_ELIM: NO.
ELIMINATED: NO.

New:
OWNER: VTRACK
INDEX_NAME: IDX_POS_DATE_P2
INDEX_TYPE: BASED ON A NORMAL FUNCTION
TABLE_OWNER: VTRACK
TABLE_NAME: FMC_POS_P2
TABLE_TYPE: TABLE
UNIQUENESS: NO SINGLE
COMPRESSION: DISABLED
PREFIX_LENGTH:
NOM_TABLESPACE: USERS
INI_TRANS: 2
MAX_TRANS: 255
INITIAL_EXTENT: 65536
NEXT_EXTENT:
MIN_EXTENTS: 1
MAX_EXTENTS: 2147483645
PCT_INCREASE:
PCT_THRESHOLD:
INCLUDE_COLUMN:
FREELISTS:
FREELIST_GROUPS:
PCT_FREE: 10
LOGGING: YES
BLEVEL: 3
LEAF_BLOCKS: 408128
DISTINCT_KEYS: 111888565
AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY: 1
AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY: 1
CLUSTERING_FACTOR: 88607794
STATUS: VALID
NUM_ROWS: 112757727
SAMPLE_SIZE: 112757727
LAST_ANALYZED: 23/06/2011 07:57:14
DEGREE: 1
INSTANCES: 1
PARTITIONED: NO.
TEMPORARY: N
GENERATED: N
SCHOOL: N
USER_TABLES: DEFAULT
USER_STATS: NO.
DURATION:
PCT_DIRECT_ACCESS:
ITYP_OWNER:
ITYP_NAME:
PARAMETERS:
GLOBAL_STATS: NO.
DOMIDX_STATUS:
DOMIDX_OPSTATUS:
FUNCIDX_STATUS: ENABLED
JOIN_INDEX: NO.
IOT_REDUNDANT_PKEY_ELIM: NO.
ELIMINATED: NO.

The simple selects and costs:

Original table / index:

Select * from fmc_pos where utc_date > sysdate-10
Plan:
ALL_ROWS SELECT STATEMENT
Cost: 5 bytes: 5,350 cardinality: 50
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VTRACK TABLE 2. FMC_POS
Cost: 5 bytes: 5,350 cardinality: 50
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX VTRACK. IDX_POS_DATE
Cost: cardinality 4: 1

Original table / index:

Select * from fmc_pos_p2 where utc_date > sysdate-10
Plan:
Plan
ALL_ROWS SELECT STATEMENT
Cost: 3,067 bytes: 2.708.856 cardinality: 25.082
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VTRACK TABLE 2. FMC_POS_P2
Cost: 3,067 bytes: 2.708.856 cardinality: 25.082
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX VTRACK. IDX_POS_DATE_P2
Cost: cardinality 2.927: 177
>
```
Original table/index:

select * from fmc_pos where utc_date>sysdate-10
Plan:
SELECT STATEMENT  ALL_ROWS
Cost: 5  Bytes: 5.350  Cardinality: 50
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE VTRACK.FMC_POS
Cost: 5  Bytes: 5.350  Cardinality: 50
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX VTRACK.IDX_POS_DATE
Cost: 4  Cardinality: 1  

Original table/index:

select * from fmc_pos_p2 where utc_date>sysdate-10
Plan:
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT  ALL_ROWS
Cost: 3.067  Bytes: 2.708.856  Cardinality: 25.082
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE VTRACK.FMC_POS_P2
Cost: 3.067  Bytes: 2.708.856  Cardinality: 25.082
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX VTRACK.IDX_POS_DATE_P2
Cost: 2.927  Cardinality: 177
```
Look at the stats of the table, not the index statistics. Cardinalities are extremely different.
Specifically, what are the high and low values on the utc_date column.
(The old table statistics are probably days or weeks, obsolete).

Concerning
Jonathan Lewis

My website looks fine in other browsers, but on firefox it arrives as an index with the title first and on the second line it says go to the content. This can be corrected?

When I look at my site it loads as an index with the heading on the top line and then a link saying "go to content" and then corresponds to the navigation in the chips. I downloaded the latest version of firefox and this did not improve the situation. The site looks very well in other browsers.

Make sure that you do not block the CSS files on this page.

Reload Web pages, and ignore the cache.
- Hold SHIFT and click reload.
- Press 'Ctrl + F5' or 'Ctrl + Shift + R' (Windows, Linux)
- Press 'Cmd + Shift + R' (MAC)
Start Firefox in Firefox to solve the issues in Safe Mode to check if one of the extensions of the origin of the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > appearance/themes).
- Makes no changes on the start safe mode window.
- https://support.Mozilla.com/kb/safe+mode

I need to change the note/endnote.

I write my RESUME, and I have a large number of appendages, that I have to put in the body of the text.

I tried to do in the pages and the best option is to use an endnote, but I need to change the Exhibitor in order to appear ' doc 1 ' ' doc 2 '' ' doc 3 "" doc 4 "instead of"1""2"'3' '4' only." ""»

Is this possible?

Y at - it another option in addition to the note?

Thank you

No one who wants to get hired puts notes/endnotes in their curriculum vitae. If you do this, you write a report, not a professional CV, which should be in a concise and standardized format (mainly for the very picky, the applicant tracking software). I suggest that you omit the end notes/notes and do research on what constitutes a professional cover letter and resume writing for your job sector target.

Get the current Index of the Ring System

I need to know the index of the ring box that is currently displayed on the front panel during execution.

The ring box values do not necessarily correspond to their clues so I can just wire the ring box itself to property [] DisabledItems.

The way I'm going to get the index of the item "displayed" the control of the ring is as follows:

A reading in the strings [] property returns an array of strings of the 'Elements' of the order of the ring.

A reading in the RingtText.Text that returns the string value of the current item displayed in the control of the ring.

I use the search function to search in the array of strings to the current text, and it gives me the index of the current item displayed in the control of the ring.

Is there a way to get the index of the currently displayed index of the ring directly control?

In a Word, no.

the method that you use is the easiest. If the srtings are very long, you could unbudle [channels] and property values and this table just to save a few (very minor) research paper. Keep in mind, control system properties depend on the operating system

For automatic indexing loop should not index empty array

Hi guys,.

I wanted to say in this VI remove empty elements in the table. He worked for table 1 d, but as soon as I gave him a table 2D, for some reason that I was unable to remove empty elements:

sdfsdfsdfadgadf wrote:

So when I was debugging, I saw at the 3rd row and 4th iteration of line, out of the inside OF the terminal loop index outter loop is [].

Should not the terminal of the index of the outer loop treat [] as 'skip it '?

In this case, the tunnel of indexation in the outer loop takes an empty 1-d array and adds it as a line to the 2D table. Because the 2D tables can not be serrated, it fills the remaining elements of the line (all) with the default value. Maybe we could say that an empty array should mean 'add all', but this behavior goes back very far and I don't know what effect this would have. As mentioned, it is easy enough to do what you want with a conditional append in the outer loop.

sdfsdfsdfadgadf wrote:

I mean what you described certainly applies if [] a something, but in this case it didn't. To prove the point, try something like this:

Check the size of the table. You will find that it is 3,0,0. In other words, you have 3 pages, each with an empty 2D array, which is exactly what builds your code.

I try to avoid dealing with > 2D paintings and which deals with the cases where they can be empty, so I don't remember the details of why this happens, but IIRC, it follows the rules of the system.

'For' loop with a different number of iterations. Second, the auto-indexation of the tables with different sizes is done. It can affect the performance of the Vi?

Hello

I have a loop 'for' which can take different number of iterations according to the number of measures that the user wants to do.

Inside this loop, I'm auto-indexation four different 1 d arrays. This means that the size of the tables will be different in the different phases of the execution of the program (the size will equal the number of measures).

My question is: the auto-indexation of the tables with different sizes will affect the performance of the program? I think it slows down my Vi...

Thank you very much.

My first thought is that the compiler to the LabVIEW actually removes the Matlab node because the outputs are not used. Once you son upward, LabVIEW must then call Matlab and wait for it to run. I know from experience, the call of Matlab to run the script is SLOW. I also recommend to do the math in native LabVIEW.

Exhibitor/index in the Notes?

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for