Export backward compatible

Similar Questions

• LabVIEW 2009 supposed to be backward Compatible?

  We have developed a set of VI Labview 6.1, and they were functional and compatible with all versions of Labview 2009.  Is not backward compatible 2009?

  
  

• Are both 14 version backward compatible with version 13 programs?

  Version compatibility: I plan to upgrade my software Adobe Premiere elements 13 and the software Adobe Photoshop elements 13 version 14. Are both 14 version backward compatible with version 13 programs? I am trying to create a long holiday with first elements 13 film and wishes to continue editing 'as is' with first elements 14. Is this possible please?

  [title published by mod]

  Short answer. NO.

  No versions are retro-compatible.

  Finish your current project in E13 and then upgrade.

• VSphere 6.0 backward compatible with vCenter 5.5 replication is?

  At one point, the vSphere replication 6.0 compatibility matrix said that it is compatible with vCenter 5.5.  I think it was around mid-March.  Now, he seems to have changed and says vSphere 6.0 replication is only compatible with vCenter 6.0.  Is this true?  Are there plans to make vSphere replication 6.0 backward compatible with vCenter 5.5?

  Bill,

  A decision was made not to support backward compatibility between replication 6.0 vSphere and vCenter Server 5.5 going forward.  This is the result extended and careful considerations affecting the provision of quality and consistent user experience for our customers using vSphere 6.0 replication.

  Thus, vSphere 6.0 replication is officially supported with vCenter Server 6.0 only (SSO 6.0, 6.0 PC, Web Client 6.0).  This resulted therefore in the interoperability of public VMware product matrix.

• Edge 20141 Animate not backward compatible with the 2014,0 documents

  This is a request for Adobe:

  Minor release revisions should not cause incompatibilities of project in .a in project files.

  The update to animate dashboard 20141 (October 2014) cause of trouble in laboratory parameters. My students using 20141 on their personal computers can't open their work on 2014.0. All our lab computers have installed 2014.0. I can understand the incompatibilities of major revision, but minor revisions should be fixes bugs and updates simple and should not affect the created projects * yesterday *.

  It's always frustrating, because we must appeal to our technical support staff any time that a minor bug fix is put up with CC.

  In addressing this issue, how a person would go to update a project .a file to be backward compatible? Edge animate, no option exists to gain back.

  Thanks for any help on this matter.

  There is a work around. Open the file edge.js and replace the number 18 t0 20 online version

  version: "4.0.0",.

  minimumCompatibleVersion: "4.0.0",.

  build: "4.0.0.359."

• Java7/JDBC 4.1 not backward compatible - DataSource getParentLogger()

  I tried to upgrade to Java 7 and had a nasty surprise. Java 7 is NOT backward compatible! After more than 15 years making the Java, this is the first time I encounter such a thing.
  
  The new 4.1 JDBC, now included in Java 7 requires that implement data sources:
  
  java.util.logging.Logger getParentLogger() launches SQLFeatureNotSupportedException
  
  It broke the a custom data source I use. The solution seems simple at first, implement getParentLogger. But I have encountered the following problems:
  
  (1) the documentation for this method sucks. It does not say much.
  
  (2) intuition makes me think that the simplest implementation is to just throw SQLFeatureNotSupportedException and JDBC will probably catch the exception and ignore any logging expected at this level. But we don't know if it is actually what he does.
  
  (3) another option would be to return a parent logger... except that I use jBoss 5.x and jBoss uses log4j for its record, not JUL. A real implementation would come back somehow a java.util.logging.Logger benefiting somehow a log4j logger. Someone suggested looking at slf4j, but it is not clear to me how I would use it for this task.
  
  Since Java 7 has been out for some time, I hope I'm not one to encounter this problem with the sources of data and logging log4j. Probably should already be advised on how to handle this.
  
  Can someone point me to a solution?

  I asked someone better than me and got:

  If an application does not support, or if the implementation of the data source is not
  use java.util.logging, a SQLFeatureNotSupportedException must be lifted and the
  the caller is supposed to handle this.

• How to install 12 CC AE (to win the CS6 backward compatible)

  I need to install AE CC (version 12), but can't find the CC 2014 and 2015 versions in the creative cloud desktop application. How to install V12?

  Background:

  I work in CC2015 AE and need to create a variant of my project which is compatible CS6.

  Because each version of AE can save the project just compatible with itself or the next earlier version, I need to install all versions between CS6 and CC 2015.

  Now, I have to also install AE CC (version 12) in order to go a little backward to save a CS6 project.

  Does that help? How to find and install a previous Version of Adobe Apps in 2015 CC

• New CC 2014 is not backward compatible!

  Did anyone else find issue with the compatibility of the new version of CC 2014 first? I created the project in 14 CC, and now it will not open in the old version. I understand that new versions of the software means changes, but not to support backward compatibility for one version of the software is quite frankly really bad form. The changes between the versions is quite minimal. I'm working on a project with two other people, and now I have to worry about making sure that all our versions of our work is compatible, or return by using an obsolete version.

  Does anyone know of a workaround? Can I go back at least a 14 CC project back to an older version of CC? I now have a project with synchronized audio full that my colleagues may not have able to open.

  It has been like this for ages, and Adobe will not change this approach. How much I agree with you that it is 'bad form', it is a reality.

  This simply means that you and your co-workers better be sure to be on the same page, sorry same version.

• 4.2.2 - backward compatible?

  If I switch to the last 4.2.2 version, would be an export generated by this import version with success in a 4.2.1.00.08 instance?
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  you will be able to import a 4.2.2 export in a 4.2.1 System. They are compatible API. We tend to change only the API in major versions when we actually do the changes to the model data in support of new features. In Patch games, we try to avoid that.

  But you must always keep in mind that if you develop on 4.2.2 and make your tests in this version, APEX 4.2.1 may show different behavior or you may encounter bugs that we have already set in 4.2.2.

  Concerning
  Patrick
  -----------
  Member of the APEX development team
  My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
  APEX Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
  Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

• Thunderbolt 2.0 is backward compatible with thunderbolt 1.0

  I have a 2011 iMac which I believe has a thunderbolt 1.0 port. Thunderbolt 2.0 works with this port as well?

  Yes. Devices and lightning 2 connectors are retro-compatible with Thunderbolt 1. Obviously, you will have all the benefits of speed T2.

• external HARD drive - backward compatible?

  Some hard drives indicate that they will be compatible with 10.4 / 10.6 etc. but it is not always clear whether it is a limiting factor or just the minimum required. Since I am still trying on el capitan and am undecided until I get a HARD drive to run the Time Machine on 10.7 times and, I don't want not to have one that does not work with the operating systems more recent. Any advice? Can I still use an old HARD drive model? Thank you

  Any hard drive equipped with a USB port is compatible. It comes to be formatted for Mac, or you need to format. USB 3.0 would be better.

• Why Labview runtime is not backward compatible?

  Hello

  I tried to run a Labview program compiled by a license for Labview 32-bit 2013 on a 64-bit Windows PC with 64 bits 2014 runtime engine. Unfortunately, there no law and required me to install a 32 bit Runtine engine in 2013.

  I thought that if a PC is 64-bit, so I need 64-bit runtime. Isn't this correct? And it's true that a computer that is running the executable files must have the exact same runtime engine version than what they have been compiled from?

  Is a minor thought, likely that a labview program can run "differently" on different versions for the engine? say, flatten to a string for examples...

  You need the version of the runtime that corresponds to the version of the development system used to build the application. This includes the number of bits (32 / 64-bit). Because you can run a LabVIEW application with a version of the execution engine - one that has been used for development - there is no reason to ask if it would be different on different execution engines, since it can happen. This said, OR try not to disturb the operation of functions between versions, and when these changes are inevitable, they are generally and there is often an option to use the old format (some functions have right-click options to be compatible with older versions).

  Windows is a special feature, called Windows on Windows (WoW), which allows 32-bit applications run on a 64-bit system. Without this, you would be able to run 64-bit applications. WoW does not, however, a 32-bit application load 64-bit libraries (with the exception of system libraries which WoW to operate). The runtime engine is essentially a set of support libraries. Your 32-bit application cannot load 64-bit runtime libraries (they don't agree on the size of a pointer, that does not pass data to reliably), so you need the 32-bit execution engine. Similarly, if you have built your application by using the 64-bit development environment, you wouldn't be able to run it in 32-bit runtime.

• Why can't you guys do the xbox a backward compatible for a short period as the ps3

  You guys are saying no to allowing 360 games on the xbox, but why you can not do, at least in the edition of the first day, the retro-compatible console for a short period of time

  You guys are saying no to allowing 360 games on the xbox, but why you can not do, at least in the edition of the first day, the retro-compatible console for a short period of time

  Hello

  XBox is not supported on these forums.

  You will need to contact XBox support for these issues.

  Directory of Xbox Forums - Xbox.com: http://www.xbox.com/en-US/forums

  Contact us - Xbox.com: http://support.xbox.com/en-US/contact-us

  Concerning

• Changes are saved to DNG with LRCC backward compatible to LR4

  If I change a DNG and then load the dng in 4 LR LR 4 will recognize my changes? LR 4 will damage the dng?

  Jim

  Some editing features that exist in LR CC will not be recognized by LR 4 If transfer you file DNG. The changes will not be recognized? Who does not exist in the LR 4.

  If you export a TIF and then importing the TIF into LR 4, all your changes will be, cooked in the TIF file.

• CC not backward compatible with the CS6... but why?

  I understand that first Pro CC is not compatible with the CS6 PP but I don't understand why? In fact, Adobe gave a reason? It doesn't make much sense to me, some aplications of cc adobe are retro-compatible, but others are not... I'm puzzled.

  It did not say why. There are applications that allow you to "save under" to an earlier version. Premiere Pro is not one of them.

  There is really not much advertising retro compatibility. Most of the teams working on a project all have the same software. Even if subscribe you to the creative cloud you can always edit in Premiere Pro CS6 if this are the people you're working with the use.

  The technical reason that is not compatible, it is that there are too many differences. The way the timeline tracks work, for example.