external access through ipsec site-to-site tunnel

Hi all

I configured n/b site VPN ipsec Cisco ASA5510 router (site1) and router sonicwall (site2).  I can access two LAN subnets.

But what I need is, routing traffic from site2 to a public ip specific to ipsec tunnel and then to internet through router cisco.

I updated the IPSec in sonicwall, so that traffic to this ip address will be routed to ipsec and all other traffic will go through the default gateway (sonicwall).

Then, I watched the packets on ASA5510 router Cisco ASDM and found that the packets intended for that particular ip address reached router cisco.

But still I can't access that intellectual property of site2. I think there must be some rules to allow that IP. And also I do not know it is possible to

access to the internet through the ipsec tunnel. ? I searched a lot and could not find useful advice. And I don't want all internet traffic to ipsec.

Thank you

Hans

It is what some similar to the only difference in the example below, it is the clients vpn access must be provided for users, but in your EAC, internet access is for some ip of an asite at the tunnel site

you will be interested in cross section

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

to give a brief idea

NAT (outside) 1

Global 1 interface (outside)

permit same-security-traffic intra interface

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Disable external access

    I have several office pools and want to enable external access through my server security for some users, but not others.  Is there a way to do this?  I want to do it at the user level, but the level of the pool would be nice as well.  Now, everyone can access internal and external...

    Yes you can do it with "restricted rights." There is an article about it in the called Administrator's guide "restrict view Desktop Access. 116 page here http://pubs.vmware.com/view-50/topic/com.vmware.ICbase/PDF/view-50-administration.pdf

    You basically 'tag' your server connection (for example 'external' and 'Internal'). By default, the pools are available for all tags, but you can restrict this and say to specific pools that you want to restrict access to the "Internal" only. In this way they are not available for users accessing the view of remote sites.

    Mark

  • Client needs to access the devices on the existing site to site tunnels

    Hello and thanks in advance.

    We use ASA5510 in respect to the vpn appliance and currently have 90 + vpn tunnels (site to site tunnels) ipsec connected to this ASA.

    Recently, we configure a tunnel for one of our customers (site in tunnel).

    Now, this client must have access at least 10 existing tunnels a site that I have.

    They must be able to access the devices on this segment.

    How should I proceed with this application?

    Can I update all existing tunnels site at 10 to add this range of ip addresses of places (clients)?

    Yes, you need to add this new subnet as interesting traffic on all 10 tunnels (on card crypto ACL) If you need two-way communication.

    Kind regards

    Averroès.

  • Tunnel of IPSec site to Site - port-based ACL

    I saw crypto that ACLs will be created but still allowing all (IP).

    What happens if I want to allow hosts on siteA to only access servers in siteB web. In this scenario, I only want to allow port 80 to reach hosts on the siteA. Is this possible? is based on the port ACL allow site to site tunnels?

    Hello.

    Seems to work for me very well:

    Opened up just port 80 - expecting encapsulation.

    R0#telnet 192.2.0.2 80
    Trying 192.2.0.2, 80 ... Open
    GET /
    HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
    Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:05:31 GMT
    Server: cisco-IOS
    Connection: close
    Accept-Ranges: none

    400 Bad Request

    [Connection to 192.2.0.2 closed by foreign host]
    R0#sh cry
    R0#sh crypto ipsec sa | i caps|ident
       local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/6/0)
       remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.2.0.2/255.255.255.255/6/80)
        #pkts encaps: 11, #pkts encrypt: 11, #pkts digest: 11
        #pkts decaps: 7, #pkts decrypt: 7, #pkts verify: 7
    R0#

    Ping should not go over tunnel.

    R0#ping 192.2.0.2

    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.2.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
    !!!!!
    Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms
    R0#sh crypto ipsec sa | i caps|ident
       local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/6/0)
       remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.2.0.2/255.255.255.255/6/80)
        #pkts encaps: 11, #pkts encrypt: 11, #pkts digest: 11
        #pkts decaps: 7, #pkts decrypt: 7, #pkts verify: 7

    Config:

    R0#sh run | s crypto
    crypto isakmp policy 10
    authentication pre-share
    crypto isakmp key cisco address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    crypto ipsec transform-set TRA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
    crypto map MAP 10 ipsec-isakmp
    set peer 1.1.1.3
    set transform-set TRA
    match address PACL
    crypto map MAP
    R0#sh ip access-l PACL
    Extended IP access list PACL
        10 permit tcp any host 192.2.0.2 eq www (19 matches)

    Distance:

    R1#sh run | s crypto 
    crypto isakmp policy 10
    authentication pre-share
    crypto isakmp key cisco address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    crypto ipsec transform-set TRA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
    crypto map MAP 10 ipsec-isakmp
    set peer 1.1.1.2
    set transform-set TRA
    match address PACL
    crypto map MAP
    R1#sh ip access-l PACL
    Extended IP access list PACL
        10 permit tcp host 192.2.0.2 eq www any (18 matches)

    This has been tested on the main road to 12.4.25.

    Note the ID of remote proxy:

       remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.2.0.2/255.255.255.255/6/80)

    192.2.0.2 is the IP address

    255.255.255.255 is the subnet mask

    6 is the number of IP - TCP protocol (ref: http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xml )

    80 is the destination port number.

    Marcin

  • How to access my Web site created through windows live?

    I created a Web site through windows live and to pay the Bill on windows live. I'm used to be able to connect to the website to make updates or changes when I signed into windows live, but now there is no option to do what I can find. How to access my Web site online for windows?

    Hello

    When you use Windows live and the question you have posted is related to Windows Live, so it would be better suited in the Windows Live community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the best support.

    Windows Live Mail Forum

    http://www.windowslivehelp.com/forums.aspx?ProductID=15

  • Troubleshooting IPSec Site to Site VPN between ASA and 1841

    Hi all

    in the past I've implemented several VPN connections between the devices of the SAA. So I thought a site link between an ASA site and 1841 would be easier... But it seems I was mistaken.

    I configured a VPN Site to Site, as it has been described in the Document ID: SDM 110198: IPsec Site to Site VPN between ASA/PIX and an example of IOS Router Configuration (I have not used SDM but CCP).

    I have run the wizards on the ASA with ASDM and the current IOS version 15.1 1841, with CCP.

    It seems to Phase 1 and 2 are coming although my ASA in ADSM reports (monitoring > VPN > VPN statistics > Sessions) a tunnel established with some of the Tx traffic but 0 Rx traffic),

    On the ASA:

    Output of the command: "sh crypto ipsec its peer 217.xx.yy.zz.

    address of the peers: 217.86.154.120
    Crypto map tag: VPN-OUTSIDE, seq num: 2, local addr: 62.aa.bb.cc

    access extensive list ip 192.168.37.0 outside_2_cryptomap_1 allow 255.255.255.0 172.20.2.0 255.255.255.0
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (LAN-A/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (LAN-G/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    current_peer: 217.xx.yy.zz

    #pkts program: 400, #pkts encrypt: 400, #pkts digest: 400
    #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 400, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
    success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
    Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
    #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

    local crypto endpt. : 62.aa.bb.cc, remote Start crypto. : 217.xx.yy.zz

    Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 58, media, mtu 1500
    current outbound SPI: 39135054
    current inbound SPI: B2E9E500

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0xB2E9E500 (3001672960)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac no compression
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, PFS 2 group}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 100327424, crypto-map: VPN-OUTSIDE
    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4374000/1598)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Anti-replay bitmap:
    0x00000000 0x00000001
    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0 x 39135054 (957567060)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac no compression
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, PFS 2 group}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 100327424, crypto-map: VPN-OUTSIDE
    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4373976/1598)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Anti-replay bitmap:
    0x00000000 0x00000001

    Output of the command: "sh crypto isakmp his."

    HIS active: 4
    Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
    Total SA IKE: 4

    IKE Peer: 217.xx.yy.zz
    Type: L2L role: initiator
    Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

    On the 1841

    1841 crypto isakmp #sh its
    IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
    DST CBC conn-State id
    217.86.154.120 62.153.156.163 QM_IDLE 1002 ACTIVE

    1841 crypto ipsec #sh its

    Interface: Dialer1
    Tag crypto map: SDM_CMAP_1, local addr 217.86.154.120

    protégé of the vrf: (none)
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.20.2.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.37.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    current_peer 62.153.156.163 port 500
    LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
    #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
    #pkts decaps: 585, #pkts decrypt: 585, #pkts check: 585
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
    #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
    Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

    local crypto endpt. : 217.86.154.120, remote Start crypto. : 62.153.156.163
    Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer1
    current outbound SPI: 0xB2E9E500 (3001672960)
    PFS (Y/N): Y, Diffie-Hellman group: group2

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0 x 39135054 (957567060)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac.
    running parameters = {Tunnel}
    Conn ID: 2003, flow_id: FPGA:3, sibling_flags 80000046, card crypto: SDM_CMAP_1
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4505068/1306)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    the arrival ah sas:

    SAS of the CFP on arrival:

    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0xB2E9E500 (3001672960)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac.
    running parameters = {Tunnel}
    Conn ID: 2004, flow_id: FPGA:4, sibling_flags 80000046, card crypto: SDM_CMAP_1
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4505118/1306)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    outgoing ah sas:

    outgoing CFP sas:

    Interface: virtual Network1
    Tag crypto map: SDM_CMAP_1, local addr 217.86.154.120

    protégé of the vrf: (none)
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.20.2.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.37.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    current_peer 62.153.156.163 port 500
    LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
    #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
    #pkts decaps: 585, #pkts decrypt: 585, #pkts check: 585
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
    #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
    Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

    local crypto endpt. : 217.86.154.120, remote Start crypto. : 62.153.156.163
    Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer1
    current outbound SPI: 0xB2E9E500 (3001672960)
    PFS (Y/N): Y, Diffie-Hellman group: group2

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0 x 39135054 (957567060)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac.
    running parameters = {Tunnel}
    Conn ID: 2003, flow_id: FPGA:3, sibling_flags 80000046, card crypto: SDM_CMAP_1
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4505068/1306)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    the arrival ah sas:

    SAS of the CFP on arrival:

    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0xB2E9E500 (3001672960)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac.
    running parameters = {Tunnel}
    Conn ID: 2004, flow_id: FPGA:4, sibling_flags 80000046, card crypto: SDM_CMAP_1
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4505118/1306)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    outgoing ah sas:

    outgoing CFP sas:

    It seems that the routing on the 1841 is working properly as I can tear down the tunnel and relaunch in scathing a host on the network of 1841, but not vice versa.

    Trounleshoot VPN of the 1841 report shows a message like "the following sources are forwarded through the interface card crypto.      (172.20.2.0 1) go to "Configure-> routing" and correct the routing table.

    I have not found an error on the 1841 config so if one of the guys reading this thread has an idea I appreciate highly suspicion!

    It's the running of the 1841 configuration

    !
    version 15.1
    horodateurs service debug datetime msec
    Log service timestamps datetime msec
    encryption password service
    !
    host name 1841
    !
    boot-start-marker
    start the system flash c1841-adventerprisek9 - mz.151 - 1.T.bin
    boot-end-marker
    !
    logging buffered 51200 notifications
    !
    AAA new-model
    !
    !
    AAA authentication login default local
    !
    AAA - the id of the joint session
    !
    iomem 20 memory size
    clock timezone PCTime 1
    PCTime of summer time clock day March 30, 2003 02:00 October 26, 2003 03:00
    dot11 syslog
    IP source-route
    !
    No dhcp use connected vrf ip
    !
    IP cef
    no ip bootp Server
    IP domain name test
    name of the IP-server 194.25.2.129
    name of the IP-server 194.25.2.130
    name of the IP-server 194.25.2.131
    name of the IP-server 194.25.2.132
    name of the IP-server 194.25.2.133
    No ipv6 cef
    !
    Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
    !
    !
    object-group network phone
    VoIP phone description
    Home 172.20.2.50
    Home 172.20.2.51
    !
    redundancy
    !
    !
    controller LAN 0/0/0
    atm mode
    Annex symmetrical shdsl DSL-mode B
    !
    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 1
    BA 3des
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    isakmp encryption key * address 62.aa.bb.cc
    !
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
    !
    map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto
    Description Tunnel to62.aa.bb.cc
    the value of 62.aa.bb.cc peer
    game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
    PFS group2 Set
    match address 100
    !
    !
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    DMZ description $ FW_OUTSIDE$
    10.10.10.254 IP address 255.255.255.0
    IP nat inside
    IP virtual-reassembly
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    Description $ETH - LAN$ $FW_INSIDE$
    IP 172.20.2.254 255.255.255.0
    IP access-group 100 to
    IP nat inside
    IP virtual-reassembly
    IP tcp adjust-mss 1412
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    !
    ATM0/0/0 interface
    no ip address
    No atm ilmi-keepalive
    !
    point-to-point interface ATM0/0/0.1
    PVC 1/32
    PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1
    !
    !
    interface Dialer1
    Description $FW_OUTSIDE$
    the negotiated IP address
    IP mtu 1452
    NAT outside IP
    IP virtual-reassembly
    encapsulation ppp
    Dialer pool 1
    Dialer-Group 2
    PPP authentication chap callin pap
    PPP chap hostname xxxxxxx
    PPP chap password 7 xxxxxxx8
    PPP pap sent-name of user password xxxxxxx xxxxxxx 7
    map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto
    !
    IP forward-Protocol ND
    IP http server
    local IP http authentication
    IP http secure server
    !
    !
    The dns server IP
    IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.10.1 808 interface Dialer1 80
    IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.10.1 25 25 Dialer1 interface
    IP nat inside source overload map route SDM_RMAP_1 interface Dialer1
    IP nat inside source overload map route SDM_RMAP_2 interface Dialer1
    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 permanent
    !
    logging trap notifications
    Note category of access list 1 = 2 CCP_ACL
    access-list 1 permit 172.20.2.0 0.0.0.255
    Note access-list category 2 CCP_ACL = 2
    access-list 2 allow 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
    Note access-list 100 category CCP_ACL = 4
    Note access-list 100 IPSec rule
    access-list 100 permit ip 172.20.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.37.0 0.0.0.255
    Note CCP_ACL the access list 101 = 2 category
    Note access-list 101 IPSec rule
    access-list 101 deny ip 172.20.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.37.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 101 permit ip 172.20.2.0 0.0.0.255 any
    Note access-list 102 CCP_ACL category = 2
    Note access-list 102 IPSec rule
    access-list 102 deny ip 172.20.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.37.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 102 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
    !

    !
    allowed SDM_RMAP_1 1 route map
    corresponds to the IP 101
    !
    allowed SDM_RMAP_2 1 route map
    corresponds to the IP 102
    !
    !
    control plan
    !
    !
    Line con 0
    line to 0
    line vty 0 4
    length 0
    transport input telnet ssh
    !
    Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
    NTP-Calendar Update
    NTP 172.20.2.250 Server prefer
    end

    As I mentioned previously: suspicion is much appreciated!

    Best regards

    Joerg

    Joerg,

    ASA receives not all VPN packages because IOS does not send anything.

    Try to send packets to the 1841 LAN to LAN of the ASA and see is the "sh cry ips its" on the 1841 increments the encrypted packets (there not)

    The problem seems so on the side of the router.

    I think that is a routing problem, but you only have one default gateway (no other channels on the router).

    The ACL 100 is set to encrypt the traffic between the two subnets.

    It seems that the ACL 101 is also bypassing NAT for VPN traffic.

    Follow these steps:

    Try running traffic of LAN router inside IP (source of ping 192.168.37.x 172.20.2.254) and see if the packages are not through the translation and obtaining encrypted.

    I would also like to delete 100 ACL from the inside interface on the router because it is used for the VPN. You can create an another ACL to apply to the interface.

    Federico.

  • Routing of traffic between two VPN Site-to-Site Tunnels

    Hi people,

    I am trying to establish routing between two vpn Site-to-Site tunnels which are destined for the same outside the interface of my Cisco ASA.

    Please find attached flowchart for the same thing. All used firewalls are Cisco ASA 5520.

    Two VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C is too much upward. I activated same command to permit security level interface also intra.

    How can I activate the LAN subnets traffic behind Point to join LAN subnets behind C Point without having to create a tunnel separated between Point A and Point C

    Thank you very much.

    Hello

    Basically, you will need to NAT0 and VPN rules on each site to allow this traffic.

    I think that the configurations should look something like below. Naturally you will already probably a NAT0 configuration and certainly the L2L VPN configuration

    Site has

    access-list NAT0 note NAT0 rule for SiteA SiteC traffic

    access-list allowed NAT0 ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside) 0 access-list NAT0

    Note L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB access-list interesting traffic for SiteA to SiteC

    access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    Where

    • NAT0 = is the ACL to be used in the NAT0 rules that will exempt SiteA SiteC NAT traffic
    • NAT = is the line of configuration NAT0
    • L2l-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB = LCA in configurations VPN L2L that defines the SiteA LAN to LAN SiteC traffic must use the VPN L2L existing SiteB

    Site B

    access list OUTSIDE-NAT0 note NAT0 rule for SiteA SiteC traffic

    OUTSIDE-NAT0 allowed 192.168.1.0 ip access list 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (outside) 0-list of access OUTSIDE-NAT0

    Note L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA access-list traffic for SiteA to SiteC through a Tunnel between A - B

    access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA ip 192.168.3.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    Note L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEC access-list traffic for SiteA to SiteC through a Tunnel between B - C

    access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEC permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    Where

    • OUTSIDE-NAT0 = is the ACL to be used in the NAT0 rules that will exempt SiteA SiteC NAT traffic. It is this time tied to the 'outer' interface, as traffic will be coming in and out through this interface to SiteB
    • NAT = is the line of configuration NAT0
    • L2l-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA (and SITEC) = are the ACL in the configurations of VPN L2L that defines the SiteA LAN to LAN SiteC traffic should use existing VPN L2L connections.

    Site C

    access-list NAT0 note NAT0 rule for SiteC SiteA traffic

    NAT0 192.168.3.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside) 0 access-list NAT0

    Note list-access-L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB SiteC to SiteA interesting traffic

    L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB 192.168.3.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    Where

    • NAT0 = is the ACL to be used in the NAT0 rules that will exempt SiteC to SiteA NAT traffic
    • NAT = is the line of configuration NAT0
    • L2l-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB = LCA in configurations VPN L2L that defines the SiteC LAN to LAN SiteA traffic must use the VPN L2L existing SiteB

    To my knowledge, the foregoing must manage the selection NAT0 and traffic for VPN L2L connections. Naturally, the Interface/ACL names may be different depending on your current configuration.

    Hope this helps

    -Jouni

  • IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

    Hello

    I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

    The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

    There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

    Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

    Can someone help me please?

    Thank you

    Peter

    RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

    Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1

    BA 3des

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

    !

    the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

    x key

    pool vpnclientpool

    ACL 190

    include-local-lan

    !

    86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

    !

    Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

    Set transform-set 1cisco

    !

    card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

    card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

    client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

    ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    set peer x

    Set transform-set 1cisco

    PFS group2 Set

    match address 180

    card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

    !

    !

    interface FastEthernet0/1

    Description $ES_WAN$

    card crypto ETH0

    !

    IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

    !

    !

    overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

    !

    IP access-list extended LOCAL

    deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

    !

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    !

    How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

    Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

    DE:

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    TO:

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

    DE:

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    TO:

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

    Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

    Hope that helps.

  • Failed to configure two AnyConnect & IPSEC site to site VPN

    I have established a VPN IPSEC site-to-site

    When I configure the AnyConnect (make it work) and I lose the tunnel from site to site and vice versa.

    I think that my NAT syatements are incorrect.

    Here is the config NAT when AnyConnect works properly...

    Overall (101 outside interface)
    NAT (inside) 0-list of access sslnonat
    NAT (inside) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

    access extensive list ip 192.168.65.0 sslnonat allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.66.0 255.255.255.0

    When the IPSEC tunnel site-to-site work properly, here's the NAT config...

    Overall (101 outside interface)
    NAT (inside) 0-list of access Inside_nat0_outbound
    NAT (inside) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

    Access extensive list ip 192.168.65.0 Inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 ServerGroup object-group

    How do I get to the AnyConnect and the IPSEC Site to site both to work properly? I need not reach on the other.

    Network within 192.168.65.0/24

    AnyCOnnect address pool 192.168.66.0/24

    Any help would be appreciated.

    Hello

    Try this:

    Overall (101 outside interface)
    NAT (inside) 0-list of access Inside_nat0_outbound
    NAT (inside) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

    Access extensive list ip 192.168.65.0 Inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 ServerGroup object-group
    Access extensive list ip 192.168.65.0 Inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.66.0 255.255.255.0

    The problem is that when you apply the IPsec NAT configuration, you remove the entry for the AnyConnect pool.
    Try the above and we will see if it works.

    Federico.

  • Impossible to get to the beach for additional IP addresses on IPSec Site to Site VPN

    Hello
    I am trying to set up a free IPSec Site to Site VPN between an ASA 5510 (ASA Version 8.2 (3)) to the AC and a Cisco 877 (12.4 (24) T3) to a branch.

    At the end of the branch, I have the 192.168.244.0/24 subnet.
    At the end of HQ, I have the 172.16.0.0/22 and the 10.0.0.0/8 subnets
    The inside interface of the ASA at Headquarters is 172.16.0.15/22

    When installing VPN Wizard I ticked the box NAT - T, and I included the additional subnet in the list of protected LANs.

    I can sucessfully all the subnets 172.16.0.0/22 but not access anything in the 10.0.0.0/8 subnets.
    The Packet Trace ASA tool shows the traffic inside the interface of 172.16.0.0/22 in the direction of 192.168.244.0/24 through the outside interface properly spend, but the 10.0.0.0/8 does not work. He gives no precise information why the 10.0.0.0/8 traffic is dropped.

    [HQ_LAN]---10.0.0.0/8 & 172.16.0.0/22---172.16.0.15(inside_int)-[ASA 5510] - IPSEC-[RTR 877]---192.168.244.0/24---[BRANCH_LAN]

    I suspect it might have something to do with NAT?

    Help, please.

    Hello

    Peer VPN you do not accept the LAN between these two peers of vpn segment.

    On your ASA

    inside_outbound_nat0_acl list of allowed ip extended access all <> 255.255.255.0

    and

    Router:

    access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.244.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.0.0 0.0.3.255

    access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.244.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255

    Please make the same statement subnet explicitly between two vpn peers and finally please add this route on SAA.

    Same question on this ACL so, statement of not identical subnet between two peers of vpn, please make sure it identical at both ends.

    outside_cryptomap_2 list extended access allowed object-group ip <> <> 255.255.255.0

    Route outside 192.168.244.0 255.255.255.0 ASA_EXTERNAL_GW

    Let me know the result.

    Thank you

    Rizwan James

  • AnyConnect VPN connection VPN site access to remote site

    I need our VPN users to gain access to our remote site (Site to Site VPN), there is no problem to access the main site through the VPN. Crypto map sites have the VPN pool in the card encryption.

    Any ideas?

    Here is the main Site (ASA5520) config inside 192.168.50.0

    crypto_vpn_remote-site access-list extended ip 192.168.50.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

    IP 192.168.99.0 allow Access-list extended site crypto_vpn_remote 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

    inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 192.168.50.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

    access extensive list ip 192.168.99.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

    Remote site (PIX 515E) inside 172.16.1.0

    access-list crypto_vpn_main-site permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0

    access-list crypto_vpn_main-site permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0

    access-list sheep permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0

    access-list sheep permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0

    VPN (AnnyConnect) 192.168.99.0

    On the main site, pls make sure that you have 'same-security-traffic permit intra-interface' active.

    Also, if you have split tunnel configured, please also make sure that he understands the Remote LAN (172.16.1.0/24).

    Hope that helps.

  • I get a message that says: "this connection is not approved" whenever I try to access ANY Web site

    I looked through previous questions and remove any software suspicious (it was not really, just a Bing bar). I deleted firefox and reloaded it. I bought Norton Antivirus and ran a scan - nothing. Date and time on my computer are correct. Explorer works very well. Help! I prefer firefox, but I can't access ANY Web site. I get this message every time.

    I've been down all the instructions on the Firefox support forum, and nothing has worked. The question may not be the Web site certificate, because it happens to EVERY SINGLE website I try to access. Nevertheless, I have add an exception for Facebook according to the instructions. That caused a strange page, not formatted to come. Since, I have read that to make an exception is dangerous because it can cause MORE unwanted malware to infect the computer.

    However, I did figure it out on my own so maybe this will help those who are facing this problem in the future: after reading the past messages from those who have experienced the same thing, I realized that, in all cases, the solution was to remove some kind of unwanted software (malware). I'm very careful NOT to download the software and I noticed that another victim of this says the same thing, so it's sneaky. I even bought new software (Norton) antivirus, performed a scan and the problem has not been found.

    I went to programs "to uninstall programs," sorted by date and anything that looked suspicious that was recently removed. I had something with the word "rocket" in it. It looked like a game. There is also another program that I removed (don't remember the name of it now). Removing those does not solve the problem, so I returned through all programs on my list and removed something that said "toolbar" on this topic, even if it was reliable (I had a bing and google toolbar). That doesn't seem to work either so I sort the programs by date again and I noticed that the software "rocket" was ALWAYS THERE.

    I have a click with the right on it and then click on 'uninstall' button again. It takes unusually LONG for this program uninstall AND nothing appears on the screen. The computer has just sort of is there and does nothing. I left and when I came back (about an hour later) the program had disappeared from the list.

    Firefox now works. I no longer receive this message, but here's the deal: I'm not 100% sure what program was the problem. It was this software of rocket or one of the toolbars. Nevertheless, the answer always seems to be some kind of unwanted malware, so I recommend that any victim of this problem try to uninstall the suspicious programs initially. And this means that ALL suspicious programs are RECENT, regardless of if they resemble games or antivirus or another. If it is new and you do not download it, uninstall it.

  • Web searches are redirected to OpenDNS. Cannot access these Web sites.

    This problem just started. Whenever I try to load a page (in this case Gamefaqs), I get redirected to this search engine called openDNS, saying that the site is not available. It has a link to the site, and whenever I clicked, it redirects me to this thing OpenDNS.

    I tried loading the page with the default browser of chrome on this phone, but also my laptop using firefox and chrome and have not experienced this problem. Yet the problem persists when you try to access the mobile site through firefox.

    I have tried clearing the cache, uninstall and reinstalling, yet the problem isn't resolved. I have done a virus scan, thinking it might be some form of malware that is hijacking my search engine. That all comes back clean.
    

    I've never heard of OpenDNS, nor have I allowed it to become my search engine. When I go into the settings of search engine, it does not appear, but he manages to keep hijacking of my searches on google and redirect me sites that work normally.

    Please help me.

    Hi SuperRup91, I was able to reproduce this problem on Firefox Mobile on a wi - fi network using OpenDNS. Queries for a single word for non-existent domains + by pressing the arrow go back a page of results of OpenDNS. Typing a search suggestion next to the icon of Google for the word, or by using a query of several given word of Google results. Unless you can change to a different DNS provider, I think you may be stuck with these options.

  • I had problems with access to most of the Web sites and I noticed that HTTPS is no longer, how do I make permanent HTTPS so I can access any Web site?

    I had problems with access to most of the Web sites and noticed that HTTPS no longer appears whenever I try to access a Web site. I can easily connect to my gmail and facebook account, but the problem is that when I click on a link on FB and gmail, I get the annoying message "refused to connect.

    How to address this issue, rather how to make HTTPS permanent so I can easily access any Web site. The date and time on my laptop are both correct. I am currently using OS x 10.9.5.Please!

    How to address this issue, rather how to make HTTPS permanent so I can easily access any Web site.

    My guess is that you have a damaged or invalid certificate entry OS X KeyChain, but to directly answer this question, I would say that consider you something like HTTPS Everywhere. Note, it is not available for Safari. It is available directly through the Google Chrome browser extensions.

  • IPSec Site to Site VPN Solution needed?

    Hi all

    I need a solution to provide full connectivity to one of my clients. I created two IPSEC Site to Site VPN, one between the INFO and RITA and second between NIDA and RITA. I can access RITA machine that is 172.16.36.101 at the INFO and 10.0.0.5 to NIDA.

    Now, I need to give access to my customer INFORMATION to direct NIDA 10.0.0.5 without established VPN machine to NIDA 10.0.0.5 of 172.16.36.101 access.

    Could you please give me the solution how is that possible?

    Concerning

    Uzair Hussain

    Hi uzair.infotech,

    Looks like you need to set up a grouping between the 3 sites, at the end of that your topology will look like this:

    INFO - RITA - NIDA

    You can check this guide that explains step by step how to configure grouping:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/12752536/how-configure-site-sit...

    Hope this info helps!

    Note If you help!

    -JP-

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I remove the bookmarks section search (left side of the window when open)? Just search in bookmarks.

    I don't know if it was always there, but there is now a search box at the top of my bookmarks toolbar that opens on the left side of my window. When the bookmarks toolbar is open the first thing is to bookmarks and the X to close the bookmarks. Just

  • Network AD - HOC detected on ipad 2 but access Internet No.

    I use a Windows Vista (Home Pre Version). I use a wired internet connection on my laptop & I want to share internet via wi - fi on my ipad. So for this I did the following -. 1. Add the Ad Hoc network using a WEP password and2. share the internet con

  • Problem with the start up programs

    My programs will not start correctly. Whenever I click on a shortcut, it displays a pop-up window saying 'open with '. This happens with all programs, to include internet Explorer. How can I fix it?

  • Replacement hard drive (HP Dv6-2155dx)

    Hello everyone, my name is Aiko. A week ago, I received a notice of "SMART hard drive detects imminent failure" on my laptop. So devastating! My warranty has expired because this laptop is about 2 years old. I'm trying to understand what hard drive I

  • Hole of CSA data theft?

    I followed the guide to test the strategy of protection of data theft and it works great on everything except to attach the file in the directory protected an e-mail generated by Outlook Web Access. Is this a known hole or do I need to clarify someth