Extremely slow on Server 2003

Similar Questions

• Convert a physical box 2003 Server vm and the VM is extremely slow. Trying to connect again...

  Convert a physical box 2003 Server vm and the VM is extremely slow. Trying to connect again...

  This is my first time converting a physical box to virtual. This is Server 2003. The conversion took place and I try to connect to the box now but it's so slow. Currently, he sat to apply personal settings for almost 10 minutes.

  My boss has converted physical to virtual several times before and never said that he ran into something like this.

  Am I missing something? Any suggestions?

  I think that it is always looking for active directory. the newly P2V'ed will operate all IP settings. Therefore, you will need to wait until it has expired, and then enter the IP that is (ip, dns and etc.) above. the other way to speed things up would be to disconnect your network and the thing that your OS to expired immediately.

  iDLE-jAM | SC 2, SC 3 & VCP 4

  If you have found this device or any other answer useful please consider useful or correct buttons using attribute points

• Virtual machines, run extremely slow when the console is consulted 2 virtual machines Windows Server 2008 64-bit, Windows Server 2003 32-bit, 2 VMWare for virtual machine

  I'm in a difficult situtaition here.  I am the daily contact with a new client.  My linux guy, who is also my boss who is very busy, asked me to do some research trying to find answers for what's not on this server. We have a dual Quad Core 2.5 Ghz Lenovo server with 10 GB of ram.  2 500 GB hard drives are Raid 1.  We run Virtual Server VMWare 2 on a Debian with Gnome installation as a user interface for the side of things Linux.  Grub is the boot loader. There are two virtual machines running on the server.  The one machine that serves as a domain controller is a Windows SBS 2008 Server 64 bit, and the secondary machine has no responsibility domain.  The second machine is a Windows Server 2003 32-bit.  the 10 GB of ram 6 GB is allocated to the SBS server and 4 GB to the 2003 server.

  The problem I am running into is that everything is so slow, especially if I connect remotely to do any sort of administration on the network.  Some examples of issues I've noticed is that as soon as I log on the server via Remote Desktop SBS console management Windows Server spike to 80-95% CPU usage and it will not stop unless I close the management console.  Another instance is that if I open Backup Exec 12.5 on the SBS server it will kill the speed of the processor as well.  Long story short, there are a lot of machine to do what we need to do, but something is not configured right and non of us know what it is.  Another point to note is that the server has been in production for about 3 weeks, and the server seemed to have locked up just twice.  My professional guess is that over time, some chose thing is eating causing the crash of the memory.

  Sorry I do not have much technical insight on this topic, but this is the best I have to offer.  Any questions you all have, I'll ask my people and see if I can answer, but I could really use your help here.

  Thank you in advance,

  Heath

  2 things:

  1 you really need hard drives more than 2 in a RAID 1 for proper performance under load. More disks the better. Although I don't think that's what your problem is, he'll probably be the problem Next you will do.

  2. I don't know exactly where the configuration file is on your box of Debian for VMware Server, but you should consider adding the following options in the configuration file (on windows, it's the vmware 'config.ini'):

  prefvmx.minVmMemPct = "100".

  MemTrimRate = 0

  sched.mem.pshare.Enable = "FALSE".

  mainMem.useNamedFile = "FALSE".

  If you do some research, you can read about what these options (the largest is the memory page sharing - it should only be left on if you have a bunch of similar virtual machines running on the same box, that you don't have.) I honestly know why this is on by default, he kills the CPU when virtual machines are running different operating systems). These are the options that I now use standard in VMware Server deployments, with huge performance increases after you have added the. Just give a try.

  Edit: Also make sure that you have installed in your virtual machines VMware tools.

  Dimitri Rodis

  Integrita Systems LLC

  http://www.integritasystems.com

• Nested Win2012 Server/HyperV extremely slow, how to fix?

  I apologize if you think this question is off-topic:

  I have a desktop computer with processor AMD FX - 8320 8 and 32 GB, I use VM Workstation 10.0.4, so I installed Windows Server 2012 with 4 vCPU, 16 GB of RAM and 120 GB HARD drive, then I installed HyperV 2012, as part of this VM VMWare, virtualization, my selection engine is 'virtualize EPT-x/Intel VT or AMD-V/IVR' and 'virtualize the CPU performance counters. , the preferred mode is "auto".

  Now when I try to install Centos 4.8 and even windows XP Professional in HyperV 2012, it of extremely slow, probably qwill takes 2 hours just to install XP, (I am aware Centos 4.8 iss not supported by Microsoft for reasons of competition), try using HyperV is also very slow, I already posted this on Microsoft forum.

  any idea?

  BTW, this is my first post here, this web page as system is difficult to use, I can't PASTE anything, and if I try to paste anything, I won't be able to type anything it.

  If you can manage without it, I would delete the USB of the Guest adapter.  Also, you might get better performance if you install VMware Tools.

• Convert an Esxi 4 2 Server VM runs extremely slow

  Hello

  I am very new to virtualization and have just the configuration server ESXi 4 that will replace the VM Server 2 systems we tested.  Recently, I tried to convert one of my server-2 VMs (Using the 'Converter Standalone Client') a VM (Version 7) Infrastructure.  After two days of continuous operation, the converter was only 5% finished and was transferring data to 24 kb/s (the server is ~ 150 GB in size).  This seems to be extremely slow and I hope that there is something that I can do to speed up that this server should run during opening hours and I like that, I can't take it down more than the weekend.

  I ran the converter Client on the server that hosts the virtual machine, and that server and the ESXi have dual network adapters connected to a managed switch of FD 100 MB.  (They are both on the same switch).  The virtual machine was not working and there was almost no other network activity going on during the conversation.

  Any help is appreciated

  The goal is to eliminate the things that it is not. Download your installation as simple as possible. I don't know what your problem is, but it certainly seems like a network problem. A single 100 MB network adapter should work much faster than the speed you receive.

  Other things to eliminate are pass the port problems, configuration issues, cable issues, NIC

  Run something like wireshark as you begin your conversion. See if you notice any problems in the capture.

  Create a new fresh installation of the VM on the ESXi host and check the flow rate etc. You don't want to go to production if you have problems. Monday will not be fun if you do.

• Extremely slow printing wireless with HP Photosmart Premium C309g-m

  I see extremely slow print speeds when printing from a Mac or a Windows XP system on a new printer HP Photosmart Premium C309g-m wireless. The printer starts printing immediately when I request a print, but it only prints one line. It will take about 15 minutes then to print the rest of the page, each print after a very long break line. Print demo page doesn't exhibit this problem, only documents of programs such as Word 2008, Safari, and Firefox (I tried firefox on PC and Mac) are affected.
  
  If I connect to the printer via a USB connection it prints very well, so this problem seems to be the only wireless printing.
  
  Printer: HP Photosmart Premium C309g-m
  Computer: Mac mini (late 2009 model) (also tried a Windows XP laptop, by comparison using the latest drivers from the HP website)
  OS: Mac OS X 10.6.2 with all available updates installed
  Method of connection: cable Ethernet connection to the router wireless
  Printer drivers: version 2.2.1 (Apple provided, drivers HP never installed as system comes with 10.6)
  Wireless router: Apple TimeCapsule (early 2009) 1 TB, honing a/d and modes of b/g on 2.4 and 5 GHz. TimeCapsule is in transition as the DSL modem handles DHCP service mode
  Encryption: WPA2 Personal, no MAC filtering or hide the SSID.

  IP addressing scheme: all addresses are distributed by the server DHCP without reservation of any kind

  The TimeCapsule is sitting three inches from the printer and the printer indicates the complete signal. Connecting the printer to the wireless network and setup of the printer on the Mac went off without a hitch. Only when you print a test document discover us the problem. The wireless network will behave as expected when you access Internet from Mac and Windows devices (tested with a laptop computer Dell XP and a MacBook with OS X 10.6.2), so I don't see any problem with the wireless network together.
  
  Attempt to use:
  1 reboot and power off, wait, restart the computer
  2 reset the print subsystem, the printer off and on again and reinstall the printer

  3. disconnect the power to the printer and let it sit for several minutes before trying to print wireless.
  
  None of them worked.

  I don't know exactly what is happening... I'll have to think about.

  Looks like you're running with the current configuration.

  Can we call this resolved?

• transferring files to the slow nas Server

  I just bought a new PC (HP Compaq) with Windows 8 and you have a NAS from Synology DS209 server. I joined this as a networkdrive, but it's extremely slow to copy files from the PC to the network (24 Kbps) drive. The two units are wired (no WIFI) directly to the router. With Windows 7, I had NO problem, and I tried with a portable Win7 - no problem.

  Someone knows what to do?

  Anti-spyware programs can certainly cause network performance problems.  If a program is the only difference between now and before, then this is probably the cause of the problem.

  Fortunately, you have created a restore point before installing each program.  You could install Spybot and restore if he did cause the problem.  Another factor could be if there is another program, such as Norton Internet Security, which also provided spyware protection they could have a conflict.

• Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition x 86 - Server starts fine with 8 GB of memory but runs slowly

  I have a client with a Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition x 86. The server starts fine with 8 GB memory [in any config] but runs super SLOW [like 10 minutes to load slow Windows] with 10 GB of memory. The operating system supports 64 GB of memory and material support it 16 GB of memory, so everything is compatible. Is there something that should be set to 8 GB term well?

  Please repost your request in the Forums of Windows Server.  Thank you!

• Windows Server 2003 on the HARD IDE in Mode ATAPI drive?

  Hello!
  My problem is that I want to know if a HDD IDE will run in Mode ATAPI.

  More details >

  There is a motherboard of INTEL S5000 VSA server in the office. He already had Win 2003 and everything was fine until the HARD drive crashed and the people replaced by an a SCSI maintenance (I don't know if he had a SATA, SCSI or an IDE HDD previously). After installing new HARD drive, they were not able to install Win server 2003 and went for 2008. Windows Server 2008 creates problems for us and the maintenance people are also confused and unresponsive to the situation.

  We have Windows Server 2003 R2. The motherboard has only one IDE port but scored the "working mode" as ATAPI. I was wondering if I could just attach an IDE HDD and install Win Server 2003 R2 (since win 2003 supports SATA out-of-the-box)

  (Displayed in the section of WIN XP as Win 2003 sharing the same base with XP, XP users can comment too)

  http://www.Intel.com/CD/channel/reseller/APAC/Eng/products/server/boards/DP/S5000VSA/feature/index.htm#specifications

  If a geek myself, I'm not very educated when it comes to servers. a Google search also did not help. I would be grateful if someone can help out me.

  Thank you
  Chirag.

  Yes it will install and work fine on an IDE hard drive, ATAPI devices are all IDE drives.  The downside is that the reader will be much slower than the SCSI on a busy server, which can be a big disadvantage.

  For all its value that they probably could not install Server 2003 on the SCSI disk because they weren't using the method of F6 to provide drivers SCSI on a diskette or that they could not understand or how their wake worth installation CD.  There is no need of such a monumental lapse, notwithstanding the limitation INT-13 NT4 Server installed on SCSI and Server 2003 installs on SCSI providing that you give appropriate when installing drivers.

  John

• What to do when a PDC to Windows Server 2003 fails

  What to do when a PDC to Windows Server 2003 fails,

  We have already installed additional domain controllers to replicate with the PDC, but after that the Principal domain controller only not the system slows down and you get it working again. What is the fastest way to recover all the information that was in the CDP. Is there a way to retrieve all the information stored in the PDC without having to reinstall everything again.

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/WindowsServer/default.aspx

  Repost nicely in the Community Server above.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• vFoglight storage is extremely slow!

  Hello

  I'm under vFogStorage (v 1.6) on a virtual machine (vSphere 4.1U1) with 2 vCPU, 6 GB of RAM and 4 vDisk (on a Netapp array with 17x15K SAS drives). The virtual machine itself works well, but vFogStorage is extremely slow and unresponsive for moments.

  I tried using the console installed on the server of vFogStorage and also with the help of the office of the administration remotely. In both cases, the console freezes randomly and after a while, he returned to answer, but when using the desktop of remote administration that it is virtually unusable as frost periods are larger than on the local server.

  It is possible to set the system to speed it up?

  vFoglight storage has a fix that resolves this problem.  This problem has been taken offline and the problem has been identified.

  Version 1.6.1 will be this "patch" included and has solved several problems of performance.

  Mike

• Administration console extremely slow to save changes

  We are duplication event bookings in Business Catalyst to create new dates on our site (we sell face-to-face courses).

  Our admin team had trouble with the last 4 + months. The administration console is extremely slow save changes and will sometimes disconnect you with:

  "Error code: 0Message: Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManagerServerErrorException: an unknown error occurred while processing the request on the server." The status code returned by the server was: 0 "

  Any ideas on how to make admin console user friendlier for those minor updates?

  We contacted our Web designer who can't seem to reproduce the problem on their end.

  Thank you

  This seems also spent a few years in the EU Admin Console takes forever to save

  This seems to be something more for the moment.

  Could you do a real support, ticket say that there are several partners and messages of the forum on this issue more and more and see where you get with that.

• Apache 2.2 - 12 c WebLogic proxy behavior extremely slow when using SSL

  We find that extremely slow behavior (loading time of 1 + minute) when you try to access a Server WebLogic 12 c behind an Apache 2.2 web server.  We use the latest version of the WebLogic Apache plugin, which is designed for Apache 2.2.  It is under the 1.7.0_21 of Java on a virtual Linux of RHEL6 machine.  If I disable SSL and point the WebLogic plugin to the no - SSL WebLogic port, the page renders in less than 1 second.

  Note: Another machine with the same configuration (almost?) does not exhibit this behavior.  I'll call it the 'work' VM.

  I compared the httpd.conf, httpd-dist and WebLogic console configuration tabs between the two environments, and everything seems to fit.  The only major difference between these two environments is on the 'work' VM we're running WebLogic as a standard user; and Apache on the machine with a strange behavior, WebLogic runs as root.  We have not noticed any problems with such a configuration in the past.

  The delay between the request for page and page rendering is a little over 1 minute.  I turned on SSL debugging extended and looked through the newspaper, and I see the same delay when requesting.  An excerpt from my weblogic - server.log follows.  I don't know if the exception I see below is normal or not; I checked, and I see the same exception on our 'VM work' so I guess that this is probably not the culprit.

  My httpd.conf contains:

  < IfModule mod_weblogic.c >

  WebLogicHost my_host

  WebLogicPort 7004

  Proxysecurise WE

  ConnectTimeoutSecs 20

  WLSSLWallet/appl/apache/certs/my_host-oracle-wallet

  DebugConfigInfo WE

  WLProxySSL WE

  < / IfModule >

  Thanks in advance - any help would be greatly appreciated!

  Here's the log of WebLogic.  The Apache log displays any errors.

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361752 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: try to get the certificates of the SSLSession, SSLPeerUnverifiedException peer: peer not authenticated." >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361753 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: negotiatedCipherSuite: SSL_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA >.

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361753 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: SSLEngine.getNeedClientAuth (): false >.

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361753 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: peer certificate chain: null >.

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361753 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: weblogic.security.utils.SSLTrustValidator.isPeerCertsRequired (): false >.

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361753 > < BEA-000000 > < validationCallback: validateErr = 0 >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361753 > < BEA-000000 > < peer certificates are not necessary and are not provided by peer >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361754 > < BEA-000000 > < user weblogic specified validation trustmanager status 0 >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361754 > < BEA-000000 > < SSLTrustValidator returns: 0 >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361754 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] [[: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: no failure of the trust, validateErr = 0. >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361754 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: successful post-handshake processing.» >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361755 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: called SSLEngine.unwrap (ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer []): result = Status = BUFFER_UNDERFLOW HandshakeStatus = NOT_HANDSHAKING '.

  bytesConsumed is 0 bytesProduced = 0. >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '3' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361756 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '3' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer', 5, Thread group to queue]] : "[weblogic.socket.Muxer']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: called SSLEngine.unwrap (ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer []): result = Status = OK HandshakeStatus = NOT_HANDSHAKING.

  bytesConsumed is 2029 bytesProduced = 2000. >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '3' for the queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361756 > < BEA-000000 > < certificates of treatment of Exception: peer not authenticated

  javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not authenticated

  at sun.security.ssl.SSLSessionImpl.getPeerCertificates(SSLSessionImpl.java:397)

  at weblogic.servlet.provider.WlsSecurityProvider.getSSLAttributes(WlsSecurityProvider.java:203)

  at weblogic.servlet.internal.VirtualConnection.initSSLAttributes(VirtualConnection.java:163)

  at weblogic.servlet.internal.VirtualConnection.init(VirtualConnection.java:74)

  at weblogic.servlet.internal.VirtualConnection.initSSLAttributes(VirtualConnection.java:163)

  at weblogic.servlet.internal.VirtualConnection.init(VirtualConnection.java:74)

  at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.initFromRequestParser(ServletRequestImpl.java:300)

  at weblogic.servlet.internal.HttpConnectionHandler.dispatch(HttpConnectionHandler.java:558)

  at weblogic.servlet.internal.MuxableSocketHTTP.dispatch(MuxableSocketHTTP.java:115)

  at weblogic.socket.JSSEFilterImpl.dispatch(JSSEFilterImpl.java:213)

  at weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketDiscriminator.dispatch(MuxableSocketDiscriminator.java:185)

  at weblogic.socket.JSSEFilterImpl.dispatch(JSSEFilterImpl.java:213)

  at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocketOnce(SocketMuxer.java:965)

  at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocket(SocketMuxer.java:897)

  at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:130)

  at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)

  at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)

  at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:147)

  at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:119)

  >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:56:01 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < ExecuteThread: '99' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default' > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085361758 > < BEA-000000 > < [thread [ExecuteThread: '99' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default', 5, Thread group to queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default']] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter : SSLENGINE: SSLEngine.wrap (ByteBuffer ByteBuffer) called: result = Status = OK HandshakeStatus = NOT_HANDSHAKING

  bytesConsumed is 130 bytesProduced = 157. >

  (Note that more than one minute on here with no other journal entries!)

  # < 9 August 2013 4:57:06 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < DynamicJSSEListenThread [DefaultSecure] > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085426938 > < BEA-000000 > < [Thread [DynamicJSSEListenThread [DefaultSecure], 9, WebLogicServer]] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: SSLEngine.setEnabledCipherSuites (String []): value = TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256, TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 ,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA ,TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA,SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA,TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA,TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA ,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,SSL_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,SSL_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,SSL_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV. >

  # < 9 August 2013 4:57:06 PM CDT > < Debug > < SecuritySSL > < my_host > < CASWEBAdminServer > < DynamicJSSEListenThread [DefaultSecure] > < < WLS Kernel > > <><>< 1376085426939 > < BEA-000000 > < [Thread [DynamicJSSEListenThread [DefaultSecure], 9, WebLogicServer]] weblogic.security.SSL.jsseadapter: SSLENGINE: SSLEngine.setEnabledProtocols (String []): value = SSLv3, TLSv1, SSLv2Hello, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2. >

  Thank you

  -sam

  Note that the ' javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not authenticated ", could indicate the Java has problems with the validation of the certificate.

  VeriSign must be present in the Virtual Machine cacerts keystore Java. What you can do is download the certificate using openssl, for example.

  ECHO | OpenSSL s_client-connect ${HOST}: ${PORT} 2 > & 1 | SED - don't ' / BEGIN-CERTIFICATE - /, / END CERTIFICATE-/ p'

  and then manually import it into the cacerts file, for example (extracts of Middleware: secure the WebLogic Server)

  keytool-import - alias some_alias-file some_certificate.pem - keystore ${JRE_HOME} / lib/security/cacerts

  The slow response may occur, in the sense that Java uses a random generator to slow (OS). Also in the ${JRE_HOME} / lib/security/directory there is a file called java.security. In this file the following line is present

  SecureRandom.Source=file:/dev/urandom

  On a Linux system, this must change for

  SecureRandom.Source=file:/dev/./urandom

  Now, it will recognize as a file and start actually using it, instead of falling back into the slow random file.

• Download of virtual machine using extremely slow browser data store

  Hello

  Why download VM files totalling nearly only 8 GB in vSphere Client v4.1.0 (from 4.1.0 ESXi) via a Gigabit LAN would take more than 1800 minutes (30 hours)? Well now after about 5-10 minutes to download, it is said 1560 minutes but still, why is it so slow? I thought that perhaps is that the estimated time remaining is miscalculated, but this isn't the case. The download is just extremely slow.

  Not only that but vSphere Client (VpxClient.exe) constantly uses 25-45% of my cycles while all CPU's do the downloading of files. This slows down the PC I am running vSphere Client. The local network on the server and the client connections are Gigabit too.

  UPDATE: download time now has increased up to 1924 minutes back and it becomes difficult to use my PC for e-mail in Outlook, etc. because vSphere Client seems to use as many cycles CPU.

  UPDATE 2: 2 hours for download via vSphere Client and remaining time jumped up to 2287 minutes. I'm going to cancel and try to download via the web browser interface.

  See the attached screenshots.

  Thank you

  Derek

  Yes. Choose to export to the format of the workstation.

  André

• Connection via extremely slow Listener

  Hi gurus,
  
  I had problems with the opening of connections at the base. The specifications of the machine of DB are OK and the use of resources appears to be low. However, whenever I try to connect to the database in the morning, it takes more five minutes to connect if you try to connect locally or remotely.
  
  Sessions parameters and processes are great, the listener.log file also has not reached 2 GB so the log size is not a problem. I have however noticed that if you connect locally to the database without using the AMT connect descriptor, it connects instantly without any problems. So, I think there may be a network problem. There is nothing conclusive on the follow-up files either, no error is reported in the files. The workload on the server and the number of users accessing the system is the same.
  
  The only thing I noticed is that the server you have designated as the gateway on the network settings was not running, could have an impact on the listener?
  Encounter the error, I decided to re - route traffic to a different DB server (which isn't having the problem of the listener), when I did, she also started getting extremely slow response, the front door on the second server is identical to the front door on the main server. So, I would ask if gateways on the network adapters have an impact on the functioning of the listener.
  
  Edwin
  
  PS the DB is a database of Oracle 11.1.0.7 on Oracle Enterprise Linux (OEL5 x 64)
  
  Published by: edowino on March 8, 2010 03:58

  There may be much reason this problem network viz, oracle, os etc. However the first thing I will check (had the similar problem in the past with AIX) - is the listener.ora and tnsnames.ora is configured with the Ip/hostname address.
  If the host name, make sure of course correct entries are in the file entries and hostnames server is correct in /etc/resolv.conf (can be different in other flavours on unix).

  ~ G