Eyelid field bug

Similar Questions

• HTML Editor: are there known with field bugs merges into hyperlinks?

  " I try inserting a merge into a hyperlink field (our contacts have custom subdomains I want to make a link to), which is the syntax: < a href =" http:// < span class = eloquaemail > field_merge1 </span >. website "> "

  However when I test the connection need me a URL that looks like: ' < span class = "eloquaemail" > field_merge1 </span >.» website' in the browser.

  The strange thing is I managed to get this merger of field working in other emails, but when you use exactly the same syntax for email newly uploaded - it breaks.

  Anyone have any idea why this is happening? There are the known bugs with the HTML editor or any workaround that exist?

  Have you added this link? Whenever we send a link with a fusion of field, you must disable the monitoring, otherwise the link appears just as it did in your example, with code fusion instead of the merged data.

  If this isn't the problem, have you checked the obvious candidates first: that the merger of field is correctly implemented, as recipients have contained in the appropriate field in the database, etc.. ? If you want just send test emails to yourself, it is possible that you have not contained in your file? If you have it right in your example, make sure that it is without the quotes in the span for the URL tag.

• Eyelid Field Manager problem

  SA

  I do a custom button and add to a screen extends screen then

  I added a listener to accept the actions of the user

  It worked fine

  but when I added it to the eyelid area manager

  and to add a listener (.setChangeListener (this) accessories FieldChangeListener)

  It's not wo

  WH

  thnks in advance: flower

  THE problem was with touch methond it was return true then he locked all screen

  so

  It should return false to unloack to the touch of the screen

• Get-TagAssignment entity includes the names of custom field (Bug?)

  Our environment uses several annotations on the VMS CustomAttribute. I noticed that when I use Get-TagAssignment on the virtual machines in our vCenter, the entity object, which should be only an object VM (VirtualMachineImpl), has a name that includes all the majority of the CustomAttribute annotation names. This happens regardless of whether I do anything regarding CustomAttributes or not. I tested on multiple vCenters and multi-instance PowerCLI (all 6.0R3) on different computers with similar behavior. I tried to search and I couldn't find any reference to a bug anywhere.

  Also strange that some of the VMS seem to have the name of the computer virtual appears first, then the different names of CustomAttribute. Other virtual machines, seem however to enumerate CustomAttribute appoints first as well as the name of the virtual machine in the end. No apparent reason for the difference.

  This looks like a bug, but I want to confirm whether there is something unusual about my environment or if others are able to replicate this.

  Steps to reproduce (assuming that the standard modules are loaded):

  > Connect-VIServer [vcenterServer]

  > $vmTags = get - VM | Get-TagAssignment

  > $vmTags

  List entity as ' [CustomField1Name] [CustomField2Name]... [CustomFieldnName] [VMName] »

  Interestingly, registration $vmTags.Entity.Name will be back in reality than the names themselves (without names CustomAttribute) virtual machine. So, it's still usable for name matching.

  If it's something specific to my environment, someone has any ideas on what could be the cause of this?

  Confirmed, this is indeed a bug.

  The @entity.name of the TagAssignment object property, has all the custom attribute names and the name of the entity.

• DSM 2010 field legend Bug

  The 2010 version of the DSM (Distributed System Manager) has some new features (historical graph of data windows scroll bars!) and also some bugs.

  It seems that the field caption text has been changed from left to right.  I guess that this was done to allow the data field should be aligned with the right edge?

  This new feature has a bug that causes the text field will be truncated when you create a historical graphical window (see attachment).  Is the only way to solve this

  to close and reopen the DSM.  Personally, I'm not really sold on the justification of the right anyway.  I think I would prefer something that would really separate from the

  text fields and digital entirely so that the text could be left justified and the fields right digital alignment.  Or maybe even replace the legend of the plot with a tree which

  This will allow you to view additional data such as the track path axis is associated.

  

  sachsm:

  Just a quick question: what happens when you scroll the legend on the left? Mine appeared truncated, but it starts all the way to the right and may appear cut off the text at the start (until you highlight).

  I'll do some tests more to try to replicate this, but I just wanted that stand out and make sure that we see different things.

  Thank you!

• a bug with the structure that contains bit fields?

  using CVI 8.5. I tried to set up a structure that contains bit fields. Although the structure compiles, I encounter strange behavior when you access individual fields, while the value of the overall structure seems ok. Here is the structure:

  typedef struct
  {
  Union
  {
  struct
  {
  unsigned int Flag1: 1;
  unsigned int dummy: 3;
  unsigned int Flag2: 4;
  unsigned int Indicateur3: 4;
  unsigned int dummy2: 4;
  };
  unsigned short;
  } flags;
  } flagset;

  When you set the Member 'all' to a value so that one or more indicators, but not all, are false, I still read the individual like real flags, until all flags are set to false.

  I missed something? This definition is really legal?

  Please find attached a file showing the problem.

  The same issue is at stake with or without the ternary operator. It turns out the problem was not specifically with printf, but rather a bug in the compiler that is related to the evaluation of the members of anonymous internal structures. If several internal anonymous struct members are evaluated before the compiler actually do anything with the result - which is the case when passing arguments to a function-, so they will all be evaluates the value that was evaluated last.

  A. Mert

  National Instruments

• Window Live Mail 2011 - was a bug - in the case of "sent" folder by clicking on the To: column head seems to sort emails by topic instead of field

  Window Live Mail 2011 - was a bug - in the case of "sent" folder by clicking on the To: column head seems to sort emails by topic instead of field

  In short, many users of Window Live Mail 2011 had the same problems. Please Microsoft Ltd fix!

  1: you send messages in a forum XP and WLMail 2011 does not work on XP.

  2: the Windows Live Mail Forum is located here.
  http://www.windowslivehelp.com/forums.aspx?ProductID=15

  Bruce Hagen
  MS - MVP October 1, 2004 ~ September 30, 2010
  Imperial Beach, CA

• Bug? White Composition Widget - all trigger superposition of fields if STROKE is set to 'None '.

  I encountered a strange bug:

  After the Muse 2015.2 update, my triggers fields are all in the same place on top of the other when I put the race to zero.

  You can see it in preview or publication. Design view remains normal.

  It's just me wanting to Adobe to have a peek. As a solution, I have added features. Thank you!

  This is a know bug and will be fixed in a next update. Look here: triggers move in the composition in the preview widget

• iOS Bug password field

  I am writing this to possibly bring some attention to a bug that has existed for the duration of my time as an AIR for developers (since AIR 3.2)... When publishing on iOS, textfields which have 'displayAsPassword' do not behave correctly.

  When you give the development of a textfield that is 'displayAsPassword', things behave as expected... as I type, I see the * begins to appear... The problem is when you focus on the TextField... your password disappears... giving the indication it is empty... But if you click on the textfield you will see once again it's actually still there.

  The biggest problem I have with this bug is that when prepopulate you a password to a value field (using some type of save the password), the field is always empty, forcing someone to click it to check its actually filled first on...

  Is there an indication that this will be ever fixed? I've never seen this http://forums.adobe.com/thread/969616 ... which basically says to make sure that your policy is embeded is no duh... and no help.

  Another solution: police to switch on the textfield in your .fla use _serif or another font that is available by default. As it is only asteriks, it doesn't really matter what you use the font.

• Format for a number field in af:query problem. Is this a Bug of the ADF?

  Hi, OTN,.
  
  Requirement: Format DepartmentId in query Panel
  
  I created a view of criteria of the Employees (HR diagram) table. I have four items in the view criteria called EmployeeId, DepartmentId, Firstname, LastName and all elements including the posting as selectively requiredproperty. Attribute DepartmentId have Format Type of the property UI tips = number and Format = * 0000 * and Auto submit = true.
  But in the user interface, I'm not able to search the af:Query Panel. It works fine without setting the property UI tips Format and Type of format *.
  
  Step 1: Type 123 in the DepartmentId field
  Step 2: Click on the search button
  Error: Please provide a value for at least one of the specified areas
  Error message: http://www.freeimagehosting.net/24d51
  
  Please see the link for downloading the sample application below
  
  http://formatissue.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/FormatTest/FormatTest.zip
  http://formatissue.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/FormatTest (SVN version)
  
  Note:
  
  JDev Version: 11.1.1.5.0
  I use BC ADF and ADF Faces components
  
  All of the recommendations fully appreciated
  
  Thank you
  Jean-Marc Mithra
  
  Published by: Fanny Mithra November 23, 2011 16:51
  
  Published by: Fanny Mithra November 23, 2011 17:21

  Has filed a bug, bug # copied to the end of this thread - edited previous comment, the problem occurs even on release after 11.1.1.5.0.

  Published by: Jobinesh on December 2, 2011 10:38

• StructCount bug when deleting a key of the FORM field

  Help, please.  I can't understand what I'm doing wrong.

  When I try to remove a key from the FORM field, the StructCount to the extent of the FORM remains unchanged, even if the key doesn't seem to be within the scope of the FORM any longer.  This is not the case when I create a struct in the scope of VARIABLES.  I enclose the code I used to test this.

  Is this a bug with ColdFusion?  Is there a fix / patch for this?  I use Coldfusion Enterprise version 8,0,0,176276.

  Unfortunately, I don't think you can avoid it as it seems to be a problem with the underlying FormScope class.  You could wrap your alternative 'counting' code in a cffunction.  Which would keep at least the logic in one place:

• Apex 4.02 BUG: text field with AutoComplete. wrong help text

  The rest of the wizard for a text field with AutoComplete you reach a screen where you can enter an LOV query. The text of the query box has following help text
  
  Enter the query that returns the list of values. The query must select two columns in the following order, first a display value then a return value. For example:
  
  Select ename, empno
  WCP
  
  
  When you select two identical columns, remember to use the single column alias, for example:
  
  Select d, r ename ename
  WCP
  
  However, the query must return only 1 value.

  Thank you, Rene, I fixed in 4.1.

  Concerning
  Patrick
  -----------
  My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
  APEX 4.0 Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
  Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

• Bug in the use of the date of another field module

  Today I met very weird behavior in the use of a datefield in a rule. I made a little video of my screen, which shows the behavior.

  Can someone help me with a workaround, or tell my what I did wrong?

  Thank you!

  Han Joosten

  The error is probably not specifically identify the problem - it's just trying to figure out the cause.  I have reproduced this error based on what I * think * are attributes defined and I think the real error is that there is no attribute "of emigratiedatum migratie van" in the entity of"migratie".  Once I added this attribute (such as a date or a date and hour) then the rule compiles.

• Missing bookmarks in the smart search field in Safari

  Since the release of El Capitan 10.11.6, favorites are missing from the smart search field in Safari to new Windows.  If a Safari any page web (so far), clicking in the search box if poster is Favorites to view icons, as is expected.

  Is this a bug, or can I make some adjustments to bring them new windows?

  Thank you!

  Dick

  Hello Dick Huitema.

  If I understand your message to the right, when you open a new window in Safari, you do not see your favorite icons in the smart search field.  When I use Safari, I always like to have my favorites available and ready to use, so I can understand why you would be tender for assistance with this.

  You probably feel that if Safari is set to open new windows in an empty page. If yours is configured in this way, there is a very easy way to get these favorites icons to show without actually changing any settings. When you open a Web page, you should see a blank webpage with your top search bar and a cursor blinking in the search bar. Instead click inside the search bar right away, click anywhere on the empty Web page and then click on in the empty search bar. You should then see your Favorites icons appear.

  Another option is to set your homepage to your Favorites. You can do it in Safari > Preferences. On the general tab in Safari preferences, select the drop-down menu next to "new windows open with", and then choose favorite. This should ensure that when you open new web pages, all your Favorites icons show immediately. Favorites icons always appear in the smart search field when additional tabs are open as well.

  Here are a couple of really helpfuls articles on Safari Favorites and search options:

  Safari for Mac: Safari search options

  Safari for Mac: see the Safari Favorites page

  Thank you for using communities of Apple Support.

  Take care

• How to fix slow auto the new message TBird address field

  When create you a new message from the drop-down list displaying all possible addresses appear immediately, but there is up to a second 20 expect the selected address appear in the address field.

  I restarted mode without failure, but the problem persists.
  I installed MoreFunctionsForAddressBook but the problem persists.

  With 100 + messages per day, is losing a lot of time altogether. All suggestions welcome.

  Even if the bug that I quoted is closed, your experience would be noted here especially if you are interested in working with developers to really solve the problem.