file limit?

Similar Questions

• clip 8 GB file limit

  Since we now have a clip 8 GB file limit will be the same as the rockets with about 4000 files

  Yes

• my file limit shows 2 GB instead of 20 GB

  My limit to synchronize file in the CC desktop application has a limit of 2 GB instead of 20 GB.

  I have a normal subscription photography CC.

  How can I fix?

  Thanks in advance

  Kind regards

  Please check the details on using Photoshop | Differences between Photoshop and creative photography programs Cloud

• Text recognition > in multiple files - limit only PDF files?

  I have a number of files PDF image scanned in a complex folder structure.  I have Adobe Acrobat Pro XI and tools > text recognition > in several files is amazing.  I was able to convert the scanned image PDFs into place and replace the original PDF files with the converted version on (a backup copy of the folder structure) and course files.  But I have other documents not PDF interspersed in the same folder structure and it converts them to pdf allowing the research as well.  How can I limit the process only convert PDF files?  I don't need a PDF version of the MS Office and other files in the whole of the structure.

  
  Thanks in advance!

  Bill

  How can I limit the process only convert PDF files?

  Not possible with Acrobat XI. You can copy the PDF files in a separate folder and perform OCR on these files.

• Export of Lightroom 3 with file limit

  Hello

  export to jpg format with the file to 399KB limit sometimes produces larger files up to 450KB. I'm doing something wrong or is this a bug? This file must limit to download files on a Web site with limitation to 400KB.

  Thank you

  Gerald

  This is a bug. The file size limit seems to be fixed in 3.2RC, but if you choose the size limit of files and filigree, the watermark will not be displayed.

• Re: Sending file failed

  Hello

  I am trying to hook my LG to my N97 netbook. Nothing spectacular to send files. I have the Bluetooth Stack (T) v.6.40.02 with windows XP.

  I did (right-click on the system tray icon Bluetooth-> Options-> Security-> Custom Level-> Mode: level of link applied security) which provided a way to transfer file from my N97 to my netbook, but not a file from my netbook to my N97. It says: failed to send file.

  Is there a size limit?

  Thanks in advance.

  You connect the phone using the PC Suite mode or mass storage mode?

  I use the USB cable to transfer files to and from my N97, there is no file limit. I have not tried many bluetooth...

  The USB cable works ok?

• Problem VLC media player - option of the context menu "add to vlc media player playlist" disappear in the selection of multiple files.

  OK, here's my problem. I installed VLC. It works very well. I have 'Add to playlist in vlc meadia player' on the pop-up menu file.

  PROBLEM: If I select more than 16 files and then "Add to vlc meadia Player playlist" disappear from the file context menu.

  ANNOYING: This stupid Windows Media Player is still there.

  QUESTION: Why vlc disappear from the file context menu if I select more then 16 files but wmp doesn't?  Is M$ trying to force people to use WMP?

  I also did my OWN program and he added in the context menu, and I discovered that my OWN program has also 16 files limit.

  Why windows deletes non MS program context menu, if I select more than 16 files? How can I solve this problem? I want to have my custom context menu program, even if I select more than 16 files.

  How to fix this?

  Hello
   
  I ask you to post this question on the Microsoft Development Network forums.
  Here is the link:
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en/windowspro-audiodevelopment/threads
   
  I hope this helps.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  Shekhar S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  If this post can help solve your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• WebVPN file download problem

  Hello world

  I have an ASA5520 with active WebVPN ASA 8.21 is software version.  I have users of webVPN login and need to download files from a cifs share.  Users successfully connect and gain access to the share.  However, it seems that when a file is greater than 2 GB, the download does not complete.  The download stops each time than 2GB.  If I log on locally and ride sharing, I can successfully download the entire file over 2GBs.    Is there a download through the WebVPN file limit?  Any other ideas of what could be the cause?

  Thank you

  Scott

  There are a few legacy group policy controls that allow you to restrict download, view, and download files.  What I read, I do not believe that these commands are hooked into the burner without ASA 8.x client.  I have this model in my lab to see if it really affects the max download file size.

  attributes of Group Policy WebVPNGroupPolicy
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec webvpn
  WebVPN
  size of download-max 3000000

  size of download-max 3000000

  mini-Max-size 3000000

• PSD Photoshop CS6 file sizes vs TIFF

  I know that there are many threads there with regard to the advantages/disadvantages of savings in the PSD or TIF, but for the time being, I am still confused on some things and embarking on an exercise where I'll be editing or reissue a lot of images - that is why, I would like to do things the first time if I can.

  My immediate question is if anyone can shed some light on the reason why an image that I save as TIF is 395 MB (in the Finder) - and the same image saved as PSD with no other change is "55 mb.

  Over the years, I've almost always saved as TIF without compression - I never saved by any form of TIF compression.  But the disparity in this case between a TIF to 395 MB file and a PSD file 55Mo tells me there is something important, I do not understand.  Reason for the question is not only the huge disparity in the size of the file, but because I am also leaning heavily toward saving all my images under PSD as I advance in my project.

  My concern is I missed something in a 55 MB PSD file vs a 395 MB TIF file or PSD just that much more effective than TIF?  I have many other images that I saved as a TIF and PSD where the uncompressed TIF file is maybe bigger than the file PSD - but nothing like this one, with a gap of 55-395 MB 50pct.

  Would appreciate any comments from what seems like many who are well informed on the issue of PSD vs TIF.

  Thank you

  Jerry Keenehan

  Image data (intended to be included on the first post):

  > > A slide scanned from 35mm to 4000ppi resolution Filmscanner Nikon Super Coolscan 5000

  > > Pixel dimensions: 112,9 M

  > > 5390w x 3662: ppi

  > > Layers: background over a layer of Vibrance.

  When you save a Tiff file you have much more save option.  You can save files compressed or compressed, you can choose what compression to use. You can save flattened or with layers.

  Save record PSD layers and you can set the size of the file with some of your preferences for the PSD in Photoshop files.   You can disable compression and save data options for maximum compatibility for older versions of Photoshop.

  PSD has a 2 GB file limit, but you can save the file larger layers using Tiff limited to 4 GB and PSB files limited by free space in other words of large file with PSB.

  Some applications can read a Tiff file, but not PSD files.  Some applications that can read the Tiff file will use the tiff full composite layer. They do not support the other layers. As Lighroom does not support layers other layers that are in tiff format are not used. TIFF with other layers have efect conposit layer lightroon conversions first changes is no longer can be adjusted to layer coposite necessitated changed by an image editior.

• How to combine more than 12 files into a PDF file?

  How to combine more than 12 files in a single PDF file? That's why I've upgraded to Adobe Pro XI.

  Hi Marshall32,

  If you have Acrobat Pro, you can combine more than 12 files by choosing File > create > combine files into a single PDF file. 12 file limit is only imposed by the online Adobe PDF Pack service. Acrobat itself isn't such a limit.

  (If you haven't already done so, you can download Acrobat here: https://cloud.acrobat.com/acrobat.)

  Best,

  Sara

• RDM vs. big files vmdk

  I saw this topic many times during the research on this topic and I did some tests in my environment to see how things are run.  I've seen conflicting information, and some of them may relate to different versions of vSphere, so I thought I would ask again using the observations I have.

  I try to implement the virtual file servers and would like to have them with 1 TB of space on their.  I am using vSphere 4 and my back-end storage is a collection of Equallogic iSCSI networks.

  Comments:

  1. the RDM or maximum VMFS datastore that I create is 2047 GB (No 2048 or 2 TB).  I have seen this documented in other threads and it seems to be true.

  2. the block size to put in shape, of the data store VMFS creates high vmdk and RDM file size limit.  1 MB / 2MB, 256GB / 512 GB, 4 MB/1 TB and 8 MB/2 TB.  I've read a few threads that says THAT RDM were not confined to vmdk file size constraints. I found an article that explained that the RDM, even if a pointer or link, is still limited to the top file limit based on the size of block formatting.

  3. If your data warehouses are formatted differently with regard to the size of the blocks, it should / could have some problems when you try to migrate their (hot or cold).  This makes sense because the target data store must be formatted with a block size that accommodates the RDM or vmdk.

  My questions:

  1. What is the impact of using different block sizes?  This is the performance, or is it purely allowing large files?  With a larger block size, I guess he could have lost there more space, but are they practical interest for VMFS or RDM?  Any guestimates about the actual % waste?  Any suggestions on the most convenient to use?  I suppose also that a VMFS partition cannot be changed after formatting the block size?

  2. If the RDM and vmdk are limited to the same maximum size based on the VMFS data store, what is the real difference between them.  I am particularly interested in virtual mode, because I want to use Veeam to save things and I need support for snapshots.

  3. assuming that I can accomplish in objective 1 TB using vmdk or RDM, why should I choose one over the other?  It seems that based on reading, the RDM method can seem like the cleaner solution with regard to the Organization of my SAN, but other messages say you must use vmdk when possible.

  Sorry for the long post.  All your comments and discussion would be really useful.

  Thank you.

  Chuck.

  To clarify your comments:

  > 1.  The RDM or maximum VMFS datastore that I create is 2047 GB (2048 no or 2 TB).  I have seen this documented in other threads and it seems to be true.

  The maximum size of any SCSI logic unit number ESX4 unique can handle is 2 TB-512 byte (even presented via iSCSI, FC, local no matter).

  As a ROW corresponds to a single LUN, he is inherently limited to 2 TB-512 bytes as well. However, a VMFS volume can span multiple LUNS with up to 32 degrees, so you can build a 64 to VMFS volume too. A single file on a VMFS will always be limited to 2 TB maximum depending on the size of block VMFS.

  It is also important to mention that NFS data warehouses do not have this limit of 2 TB.

  > 2.  The block size for setting in the form, of the data store VMFS creates high vmdk and RDM file size limit.  1 MB / 2MB, 256GB / 512 GB, 4 MB/1 TB and 8 MB/2 TB.  I've read a few threads that says THAT RDM were not confined to vmdk file size constraints. I found an article that explained that the RDM, even if a pointer or link, is still limited to the top file limit based on the size of block formatting.

  RDM in virtual compatibility mode are subject to the limitaitons of blocksize VMFS are the same way VMDK files. RDM physical mode are only limited by the limit of unit number logic SCSI explained above, since there is no VMFS on a physical LUN mode. See also http://virtualkenneth.com/2009/11/10/vmfs-and-block-size-is-important-for-virtual-rdms/

  > 3.  If your data warehouses are formatted differently with regard to the size of the blocks, it should / could have some problems when you try to migrate their (hot or cold).  This makes sense because the target data store must be formatted with a block size that accommodates the RDM or vmdk.

  There is no problem with VM migration hot or cold between VMFS volumes formatted with different blocksizes, but generally, it takes more time and has a greater impact on performance, VAAI does not work in either block sizes. I advise to use a common block of 8MB on all your VMFS volumes. There is no problem using 8 MB even though your VMS would install all in 1 MB.

  To answer your questions:

  > 1. What is the impact of using different block sizes? This is the performance, or is it purely allowing large files?

  There is no this is really purely to allow large files. Small files use small subblocks anyway and you usually don't have a lot of files on a VMFS too, so the unused space is of no interest. You cannot change the block size later. You must delete and re-create the data store. Again, I would just go for 8 MB everywhere.

  Also see this article:

  http://www.VMware.com/files/PDF/vmfs_rdm_perf.PDF

  > 2.  If the RDM and vmdk are limited to the same maximum size based on the VMFS data store, what is the real difference between them.  I am particularly interested in virtual mode, because I want to use Veeam to save things and I need support for snapshots.

  It should be more clear with my previous explanations. The differences are also explained more in-depth in the PDF document linked above and can be found in the regular documentation as well.

  > 3.  Assuming that I can accomplish in objective 1 TB using vmdk or RDM, why should I choose one over the other?

  You can easily make a 1 TB drive for a virtual machine with the two methods. I'd still go for a VMDK in your case, because it is easier to handle and not really disadvantages on a ROW. Personally, I see no real reason to use a RDM in virtual compatibility mode. Physical compatibility mode can make sense for stuff like inside a guest SAN management software or if you want to share the file system of the LUN between other hosts (physical).

  BTW. Another option with iSCSI storage is to use only an iSCSI initiator inside the host on the network virtual, totally independent of the hypervisor, which raises the limit of 2 TB too.

  Also I have recommended reading:

  http://DeinosCloud.WordPress.com/2010/07/26/understanding-VMFS-block-size-and-file-size/

• How to limit the number of newspapers VMKERNEL.nn

  Hello.

  In/var/log /, we have (ESX v4)

  5 VMKWARNING logs (1 without a number, then '1' to '4' 4)

  5 SPOOLER logs, 5 balls named SECURE, 5 named RPMPKGS, 5 balls appointed POSTS, 5 balls appointed MAILLOG and 5 balls appointed CRON

  But do not know why, there are 37 named VMKERNEL.nn

  What is the configuration of the control of this numbering system file / limit?

  Any pointer to documentation would be appreciated (very)... Sébastien.

  You may have some serious error in report with your storage space. Check it first.

  The control file is ' / etc/logrotate.d/vmkernel ':

  {/ var/log/VMkernel}
  create 0600 root root
  missingok
  nocompress
  # keep history over 3 years.
  monthly
  rotate the 36
  # maximum journal size 200 k (which limits the use of the total disc slot 8megs)
  size 200 k
  sharedscripts
  postrotate
  / bin/kill - HUP ' cat /var/run/syslogd.pid 2 >/dev/null 2 >/dev/null | true
  endscript
  }

  Change the '36 rotation"to any number of log that you want to keep but my advice is, investigate on & first resolve any errors that you find in your journal vmkernel...

  vcbMC - 1.0.6 Beta

  Lite vcbMC - 1.0.7

  http://www.no-x.org

  I vote for vExpert 2009!

• Thunderbird downloaded 3000 old messages yesterday... why?

  A Thunderbird download unsolicited messages have resulted in about 3000 messages download yesterday.

  What would cause this? I was storing some files limit... somewhere? I have a virus or something like that?

  Thanks for any advice or help.
  David

  There is a file in your profile called popstate.dat that Thunderbird uses to "remember" where are included with downloads. If it is corrupted in some way what you see occurs.

• With more than 2 GB videos for veiwing h264 problems, they won't play in windows or version mac et seq., less than 2 GB, they play very well.

  I work for a video company, video encoding, the only problem we have is Firefox plays videos not encoded as H 264 (1080) greater than 2 GB, because they do not play. I tried the two latest version 9.0.1 in mac and windows and no change. In Internet Explorer, Chrome, the video plays well. Is there a file limit in Firefox? I read somewhere else that FF also has problems downloading files of 2 GB, do not know who is bound. Any help would be appreciated.

  Firefox does even not play H264 content by default. For HTML5 video, it will play OGG / Theora and WebM, but a plugin is necessary for the H264 content.

• 4.3 Skype crashes with the old chat history

  After the upgrade to version 4.3, Skype crashes after the connection probably loading the message history.

  I tried to remove the. / record of Skype and it works like that. However, when I put the old user folder (just the , not all '. ') Skype file"), it crashes. I also tried to remove the file and then merge the history using http://suurjaak.github.io/Skyperious/ and it hangs again.

  Any solution that would keep my history?

  Maybe I have found a solution after some web research, I Skype with * wholesale * historical log... Before these orders, I can't run Skype because it segfaults with the same track of gdb in your newspapers.

  I changed my main.db database, with:

  SQLite3 $ ~ /. Skype/[YOURUSER}/main.DB

  And then, I've updated the table of Messages as another post , but I have to translate the part of the message 'sent' in my language, so I have Skype in Italian with a simple:

  SQLite > body_xml SELECTION of Messages WHERE type = 68 AND body_xml LIKE '% file %' LIMIT 0,10;

  I found the translation for "Shift": "ha inviato ' and ' ha spedito" (which are two translation valid for posted... I don't know why there are two different versions...).

  Then in a:

  SQLite > UPDATE Messages SET body_xml = substr (body_xml, instr(body_xml,e)
  SQLite > UPDATE Messages SET body_xml = substr (body_xml, instr(body_xml,e)

  followed by

  SQLite > .quit

  Now I have my 4.3 Skype works fine with my entire chat log.

  k.