Similar Questions

• The links don't work is not inside layers div w / absolute positioning / z-index

  My page has a picture of 100% swf full page in a div z-index 1. on the top is another div z-index 2 with links to other pages of my site.

  First of all the links should work in the layer upper div with absolute positioning?

  If yes what Miss me? When I click on the links, nothing happens.

  code-

  " < html xmlns =" http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml "XML: lang ="fr"lang ="fr"> ".
  < head >
  < meta http-equiv = "Content-Type" content = text/html"; charset = iso-8859-1 "/ >"
  sitename < title > < /title >
  < script language = "javascript" >
  AC_FL_RunContent = 0;

  function MM_preloadImages() {//v3.0
  var d = document; If (d.images) {if(!d.MM_p) d.MM_p = new Array();
  var i, j is d.MM_p.length, a = MM_preloadImages.arguments; for (i = 0; i <.) Length; i ++)
  If (a [i].indexOf("#")! = 0) {d.MM_p [j] = new Image; d.MM_p [j ++] .src = a [i] ;}}
  }
  < /script >
  < script src = "AC_RunActiveContent.js" language = "javascript" > < / script > "
  < style type = "text/css" >
  < / style >
  < link href = "css/layout.css" rel = "stylesheet" type = "text/css" > "
  < / head >

  < div id = "contentWrap" >
  < div id = "contentHead" >
  < div id = "logo" > swf with link < / div >
  < div id = "Visibility" > swf with links < / div >
  < / div >

  < div id = "contentBody" >
  < div id = "body" > content Page, photos and download links < / div >
  < div id = "bodyBG" > box translucent (transparent wmode) swf < / div >
  < / div >
  < / div >

  
  < div id = "footWrap" >
  < div id = "footSpacer" > < / div >
  < div id = 'foot' >
  < div id = "catlogo" > link of the swf logo < / div >
  < / div >
  < / div >
  < / div >

  < div id = "wrap" random images of > 100% background swf < / div >

  < / body >
  < / html >

  CSS - code

  @charset "ISO-8859-1";
  * {
  margin: 0px;
  }
  #wrap {}
  height: 100%;
  Width: 100%;
  min-width: 1000px;
  min-height: 700px;
  z-index: 1;
  margin: 0px;
  position: absolute;
  }
  {#contentWrap}
  height: 100px;
  Width: 100%;
  min-width: 1000px;
  min-height: 700px;
  z-index: 2;
  position: absolute;
  }
  {#contentWrap #contentHead}
  height: 25px;
  Width: 100%;
  padding-top: 50px;
  padding-bottom: 25px;
  }
  #contentWrap #contentHead #logo {}
  height: 25px;
  Width: 155px;
  padding-left: 50px;
  float: left;
  }
  #contentWrap #contentHead #topNav {}
  float: right;
  height: 25px;
  Width: 567px;
  padding-right: 50px;
  }
  {#contentWrap #contentBody}
  height: 85%;
  Width: 100%;
  min-width: 1000px;
  min-height: 550px;
  }
  #contentWrap #contentBody #body {}
  height: 485px;
  Width: 860px;
  right margin: 50px;
  margin-left: 50px;
  float: left;
  padding: 20px;
  z index: 3;
  position: absolute;
  }
  #contentWrap #contentBody #bodyBG {}
  height: 525px;
  Width: 900px;
  right margin: 50px;
  margin-left: 50px;
  float: left;
  }
  {#footWrap}
  height: 100%;
  Width: 100%;
  z index: 3;
  min-width: 1000px;
  min-height: 700px;
  position: absolute;
  }
  {#footWrap #footSpacer}
  height: 90%;
  Width: 100%;
  }
  {#footWrap #foot
  height: 10%;
  Width: 100%;
  text-align: right;
  }
  #footWrap #foot #catlogo {}
  float: right;
  height: 16px;
  Width: 80px;
  padding-top: 25px;
  padding-right: 50px;
  }

  The only thing that will cause links not working, that is if there is a positioned element by hiding links from mouse events.  In your case, it would be #footWrap div that is SUPERIOR to any other element on the page (with a z-index 3).  "But not' tell you, because div #body has also a z-index 3, to which I say" you forget that div #body is contained in the #contentWrap div that has a z-index of 2, so #body div has a z-index effective from 2-in regard to the rest of the page is concerned. "  The z-index 3 is ONLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PARENT DIV.  Div #body would be higher than another brother positioned with a z-index of 2 and less than another child of the same parents with a z-index of 4, but each of them would never to anything other than a z-index of the 2 visa-vis the page.

  Furthermore, your complete disposal scheme is sure to cause problems.  This isn't the purpose for which the absolute positioning was intended...

• How layer div rather than another without absolute positioning

  Hi again!

  Today, I try to shoot a div containing a SWF inside upward while it is organization layered on another div.

  Web Site: showcase restoration | Homepage

  I don't want to use absolute positioning, because then it goes back only this div and let the rest of the div where they were originally.

  Is it possible that I can exclude the function positioning and just make sure the header div can layer a bit on the empty div, packaging, and cursor?

  Also, I know there are errors with the website that will catch the scanner, I'll be cleaning up those very soon, it's just a matter, that I would get hit first.

  Any help is greatly appreciated!

  You cannot superimpose elements without adding a shape any positioning in combination with top, left, bottom or right attributes. The position "in the stack" (overlay) is normally controlled by the position of the element in the HTML itself, later in the code is closer to the top of the card game if you want. Index-Z must be added to change this default layering, but does nothing without positioning relative, absolute or fixed.

  You just need to understand the differences between a static, absolute and relative positioning (fixed also exists, but would not be used here) and some of its subtleties, to make this work.

  Static positioning is the default when nothing is added to the css. Most of the sites require only never static, as well as the floats, margins and padding to position elements, but because you specifically want an overlap, you will need one of the other three (my guess is on will be the best here).

  Absolute positioning is based on the upper-left corner of the nearest of the positioned element relative (relative, absolute or fixed). If there is no positioned parent, use the top left of the browser view port. Using absolute positioning completely removes the element of the natural flow of the page, leaving no space behind him and it will not interact with other elements on the page.

  Relative positioning is based on the normal position of the element in the document flow. Adding position: relative to an element, without changing what else, will appear to do nothing. Added up, left, down or right: value of attribute sets will move the element this sum of its normal position AND leave the space behind the element normally takes upwards if there is no positioning added. This will be to use very probably, as long as you are not moving your items over long distances (which would create a vacuum away where the element ends upward.)

  Fixed positioning is going to stick an element to something high, low or the adjustment of your use and even few matter how big/small browser view port is or if the page scrolls. You see this most often used with navigation bars "sticky."

• How to position my tag div with top, bottom, left and right attributes?

  So I have my background image and then I want only the sides to display so I put my div tag in the Center and does it extend to the edges of the top and bottom of the page, then theres a little bit of the background image on the sides of the white div. Than perfect, but when I focus I had to remove the position attribute. Now, I can not use the up, down, left and right attributes.

  OLD CODE WITHOUT A CENTER:

  {#whitediv}

  position: absolute;

  Top: 0px;

  Width: 930px;

  height: 100%;

  z-index: 1;

  background-color: #FFF;

  }

  NEW CODE WITH CENTER POSITION BUT CANT IT:

  {#whitediv}

  position:;

  Top: 0px;

  margin: 0px auto;

  Width: 930px;

  height: 100%;

  z-index: 1;

  background-color: #FFF;

  }

  To Center elements with CSS, you need 4 basic things.

  1. A document type is valid,
  2. width in pixels, % or ems, container
  3. a margin left and right of the automobile,
  4. default positioning (static or not specified).

  For example, the following page has a centered division.

  http://ALT-Web.com/test/resizable-BG.shtml

  The background image is applied to the CSS body selector.

  / * DIV CENTERED * /.

  {#page online purchase

  Width: 70%;
  margin: 5th auto;
  Padding: 3em;
  background: rgba (0,0,0, 0.70);
  color: #FFF;
  }

  Nancy O.

• absolute positioning in IE7 problem

  Hello Dreamweavers,

  I'm having a problem with a new site that I'm working on.

  In the upper left corner, there are two elements to absolute positioning: an image and a H1 title as follows:

  . Primary h1 {}

  position: absolute;

  Left: 20px;

  top: 90px;

  z-index: 100;

  }

  {.masthead}

  position: absolute;

  left: 60px banner;

  top: 20px;

  z index: 101;

  }

  the two elements are in .primary div that has a position: relative.

  Works well in all browsers except IE7

  In the screenshot you can see that the h1 title seems to disappear behind the white square in the show pushing the image down.

  I tried different things, like setting ' display: inline ' to floated elements but no success yet.

  Site is here:

  http://www.productfotografie-fotograaf.nl/

  screenshot is here:

  http://DL.dropbox.com/u/604341/screenshotie7.PNG

  What could this be?

  Bob

  The only thing is that I recently heard say that Matt Cutts saying that you shouldn't br really do that...

  Listen to Matt.

  That was the point. I want the image slightly overlap the H1, since there a reflection that sits on the H1, which gives it a bit of a bright and more of a look "logo".

  OK - do the

  position: relative and include the image of the camera in the

  as well as the text.  Use something like this-

  H1 img {position: absolute; top:-75px ;}}

  and adjust the values of the left/top to overlap anywhere.  In this case, I'll allow you to use absolute positioning.

• Can layers be RELATIVE, rather than ABSOLUTE position data

  I'll have a chance to find an answer to this in the HELP. I have place of the layer anchor in a table, then position the layer. If I then add (or remove) the lines above the anchor, everything on the page go up (or down), but the rest of the layer where it was, to the page, not the anchor.
  
  If there are several layers on the page, it means a wholeot of repositioning every time I do an up-page edition.
  
  Any advice?

  This can help you understand the positioning a little-

  There are 4 different types of positioning:
  Absolute
  Relative
  Fixed
  Static

  Here is a brief explanation of each type of positioning (as of)
  placement of the elements in the page only)...

  Position: absolute (or a / P elements)
  -----------------------
  Does several things-
  1. it "deletes" element of the flow of the code on the page so that
  It can influence is no longer the size or position of any element on the page
  (with the exception of those it contains, of course).

  2. the item to absolute positioning takes its position as the position of the
  his next of KIN * place * element - in the absence of any explicit
  positioned parent, it will be by default to theTag, which is always
  positioned
  at 0,0 in the browser window.

  This means that anywhere in the HTML code of the layer
  appears (betweenand), its location on the screen will not
  change (which means that you have not positioned the A / P element in)
  a table or another A / P element, of course). In addition, the space in
  which
  This item would have seemed if it was not positioned is not preserved
  on the screen. In other words, the absolute position elements do not
  all the space on the page. In fact, they FLOAT on the page.

  Position: relative (or R/P elements)
  ----------------------
  In contrast to absolute positioning, is a relatively positioned page element
  * No * withdrawn from circulation of the code of the page, so it will use the
  Spot
  where it would have seemed based on its position in the code as its
  zero point of reference. If you provide then top, right, bottom or left
  positions
  the style for this element, these values will be used as offsets of
  his
  zero point.

  This means that it any where in the code position relatively
  element appears (, as it will be positioned at this place (it takes into account
  the offsets) on the screen (this is true for any location in the code).
  Is also the space where this element seemed
  preserved on the screen and can therefore affect the implementation of
  succeeding elements. This means that the larger a relatively
  positioned element is the space more force on the page.

  Position: static
  -------------------
  As with the relative position, the static positions also "go with the flow". One
  element with a static position cannot have values for compensation (above, right,
  on the left, downstairs) or if it has them, they will be ignored. Unless explicitly
  positioned, any defect in static positioning div elements.

  Position: fixed
  ------------------
  A page with this style element does not scroll when the page scrolls content.
  Support for this in the elements other than the settings of the page is weird

  There are several other things you need to know:

  1. ANY page can be positioned - paragraphs, images, tables, lists,.
  etc.
  2. the

  tag is a BLOCK-level tag. This means that if it is not
  place or style explicitly otherwise, a) it will always start on a new
  line on the screen and b) she will always force the content to a new line below
  He and c) will always be near the top of the entire width of its container (for example,
  Width: 100%).
  3. the placement of A / P elements * can * affect the BEHAVIOR of others
  elements
  on the page. For example, a 'sex' placed on a hyperlink that will hide
  hyperlink.

  You can see a good example of the difference between the absolute and
  relative positioning here-

  http://www.great-Web-sights.com/g_layersdemo.asp

  You can see a good demonstration of why using layers for a page layout tool
  is dangerous here-

  http://www.great-Web-sights.com/g_layer-overlap.asp

  On this basis, a static div (is no longer a 'sex') would be what you want.

  --
  Murray - ICQ 71997575
  Adobe Community Expert
  (If you * MUST * write me, don't don't LAUGH when you do!)
  ==================
  http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - template Triage!
  http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, tutorials & resources
  http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, tutorials & resources
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
  ==================

  "bwilsonduncan" wrote in message
  News:fai5oe$q8t$1@forums. Macromedia.com...
  > I have no chance to find an answer to this in the HELP. I place the layer
  > anchor in a table, then position the layer. If I add later (or
  (> Delete)
  > all the lines above the anchor on the page moves down (or upwards), but
  > the
  > layer stays where it was, to the page, not the anchor.
  >
  > If there are several layers on the page means a wholeot of
  > repositioning
  > whenever I do a up-page edition.
  >
  > Any advice?
  >

• div with border

  Hi I've created an id div with a border that I want to use to get a price list at the moment as many m inside, but it does not appear on the page and I do not understand why, can help please. Thanks, Jeff

  the div is: < div id = "price-box" >

  CSS file is: residential - page_cs5.css

  {#price-box}

  position: absolute;

  border is 1px color should be terracotta to match theme

  the height is 300px

  the width is 600px

  Site and the page is: http://thecarpetandflooringconsultant.co.uk/residential-domestic_carpet_and_flooring.php

  That's because this div is nested in several other films, whose (div id = "p7IRM_2" class = "p7IRM01") has overflow set to hidden. All content outside the limit of this div is hidden. It is be the div slide show, which probably has other parameters set by javascript. If you move the "mmmmm" out of p7IRM_2 div, it should appear.

• AP elements continue to go left - have the absolute positioning!

  I am item "SEE the BASKET" that prevents the PA is vertical, but moves to the left. I have watched and read the forums, but after trying the suggested fixes none of them doesn't seem to work! Positioning is well vertically, but the box continues to move to the left. I have to move its position to get near my desired location.

  Here is a link to my page in question as well as the settings of my div. Any help would be appreciated.

  http://www.kineticcreativeco.com/boatings/ourstore.html

  CS3 running

  37px height

  902 left

  absolute position

  top of page 529 px

  visible visibility

  width 83px

  index-z (highest in the file) 25

  Your done APDiv his work based on where you placed it in the code.

  She was invited to sit and stay at the absolute coordinates compared to the top LHS of the browser window - what he is doing. When you resize the window of the browser, the rest of the page elements move the apDiv, giving you the optical illusion that the apDiv moves when, in fact, the opposite is true.

  You have coded the APDiv outside and above of

  If it is positioned over the top LHS of the browser window.

  If you want it move with the page - relative to elements inside of the

  -then you need to put the APDiv inside

  and

  Should be assigned the position: relative (which is already the case).

  Then change

  ...

  TO

  ...

  Then adjust the top and left of the Divap1 coordinates based on its new placement inside

  .

• help to float a Div tag?

  I'm difficult to correctly float a div in my site.  The page is http://www.planetwhistler.com/bandbs.html the Div on the bottom of the second column with a 'content for right_bandb_div' goes here will not be properly float to the right of the Div to the left of it.  I floated the "right_bandb_" div to the left with enough margin to clear the div in the first column, I also put the code for "right_bandb" before the code of the div to the left of it, but for some reason any, that it will not position themselves correctly.  Thanks for any help provided.

  I know that my model is not exactly like yours, but you can learn from him.

  http://ALT-Web.com/templates/CSS-centered-round-boxes.shtml

  (1) apply the min-height values to all your .boxes.

  (2) add a float of compensation between the rows.

  Nancy O.
  ALT-Web Design & Publishing
  Web | Graphics | Print | Media specialists
  http://ALT-Web.com/
  http://Twitter.com/ALTWEB

• "Draw AP Div' out of position

  Well, I'm new to these forums and so Dreamweaver, so I would like to start by saying "Hello". I have Dreamweaver CS4 that I recently got as a gift and am doing my first website. even if I'm running a problem.

  I would like to put text/images in this area on my site. I want to do it without a big box concealing my popular page layout that I made in Photoshop. See below for the photo. The encircled area, this is where I want the text/images.

  

  I found a way to do it by drawing a box with the tool 'Draw AP Div' and it works perfectly. I can insert images and write a text without a problem. The problem is when I saw my page in a browser. Everything in the box "Draw AP Div" is placed on the left a little. The only solution I found is to move the box to the right in Dreamweaver to compensate.

  Is there a way to stop the box to the left, out of the position, I put it in Dreamweaver, without moving to the right? Also, use a 'draw AP Div' correct operation to use to do what I want?

  Any help is appreciated. Thank you.

  Is there a way to stop the box to the left, out of the position, I put it in Dreamweaver, without moving to the right? Also, use a 'draw AP Div' correct operation to use to do what I want?

  AP div is the abbreviation of "absolute positioning" div. It does not move. It remains exactly where you say you want. What happened is your image. To understand the problem and dangers of the use of AP div tags (or layers, as they call) read this salutary warning: http://apptools.com/examples/pagelayout101.php.

  You'd better learn how to use CSS to use your image as a background and position the text on the background with margins or padding.

• Why layer handles disappear when I remove the absolute positioning in the style sheet

  Why layer handles disappear when I remove the absolute positioning in the style sheet, and I can't shift the most in the property inspector. Thank you, bryan

  Layers are positioned absolutely. That's what their positioning coordinates
  makes them "layers."

  Once they are positioned absolutely (via the CSS details), they are
  withdrawn from circulation of the code of the page and 'float' on the page, as a
  overlay, which appear when the code indicates to start (from top left
  then, coordinate height x width).
  That's why you can drag the around anywhere you like view creation with
  layer handles - details are updated in the CSS by DW by dragging
  your mouse.

  Once you remove the absolute positioning, they are regular

  elements in
  the flow of the page with a height and width. So DW deletes the handles as well
  they cannot be dragged around because he no longer has all the details to
  update in the CSS.

  --
  Concerning

  John Waller

• Export CSS: Absolute Position

  Maybe is just me that I don't know yet how to use Fireworks well but what I find very annoying, when you export to HTML CSS, all the styles for the DIV elements are position using the 'absolute' setting, sounds good, but when you try to insert the result as part of another page he will never look.
  is it possible to avoid this? Maybe if the whole image has been locked in a DIV of the principal and the rest will be inside with a position of "relative" to the outer box that works perfectly and can actually use it.
  Any suggestions?
  Thank you
  

  Maybe you're looking for this?
  http://www.Adobe.com/devnet/Fireworks/articles/smart_css.html

• absolute position won ' [work t

  I have a card PCI-7332, leading the two cubes of GE Fanuc Stepper.  I'm using LabVIEW 8.5.  I use a joystick to move the two axes manually and it works fine.  When I change the mode of operation to the ABSOLUTE POSITION and try to type in a position for the engine to move, engine moving.  I tried to write a test case using the same code and it does not move the engines.  But, I can refer to move with an offset from an absolute position (movement reference, reset the zero position, move position offset) and it works every time.

  This is the test case that does not work on its own.  Thanks for any help on this.

  
  

• How to find the absolute position of the end of the text, it can be one or more,

  How to find the absolute position of the end of the text, it can be one or more,

  in the position I need to inseart the image of the size of the font that it friendly ordinary view sequiential - image as custom image

  Please help us find the position of the text, and even for a function more, I demanded the conclusion the text length

  I want to do we will be right and the other will be left how I can I align is their way to find the width of the label or text?

  Thank you

  This should help align your labels layouts, depending on what you did you do could go with absolute layout, docking station or stack (allows you to align the top to bottom or left to right)

  I'm not too sure that everything, however, to determine the length of the text, I would think that you could store the text in a string and then somehow programmatically count each letter & do return a result... not exactly on how to do it but it's an idea

• Absolute positioning is not possible?

  I have an element with a parent. I want to place at the bottom of that parent. I can only this margin with reflow. As soon as I do the elements absolute position Collard (so I can designate postiion it is, using 'down' rather than 'margin-top) the child is released from the parent, feeling low: 0 square at the bottom of the scene. #fail in the real world, I would never top of the margin for it.

  So what do I do in a situation like this?

  The same thing you would do in the browser right? Ensure that the parent is itself relative or static position?  If it's static position so all children are compared to the other next of kin who is the relative or absolute position.

  -C