FMIS 4.5 SIP support?

I see in the product comparison matrix that FMIS 4.5 allows SIP ports, but I'm not find any documentation or API related configuration

Is there a documentation available? Flash Media Gateway has been deployed in FMIS? We can manage incoming calls from SIP with FMIS now?

Thanks Nikhil.

In fact, I found the answer I needed. FMG has not been incorporated into FMS, it just comes with it. So, documentation isn't in the docs of FMS... installation of docs FMG with FMG.

Tags: Adobe Media Server

Similar Questions

  • Received an email from - find my line < support@fmi-apps.me >.

    Hello

    My iPhone got stolen and I had a series of email to find my iPhone asking me to connect to iCloud in the last hours persuade me to connect from 2 email accounts, click on the link and try to see the place, but I found a little email off the coast and decided to I opened a session on iCloud and found my phone lit up briefly. Is one of these e-mails are legitimate and if there will be an email to iCloud - what should be?

    2 emails I got:

    Find my APPLE FindMyIPhone <[email protected]> and <[email protected]> line

    Thank you very much for your help in advance,

    Fern

    None of them are Apple.

  • EtherChannel does not support on 400 7600 - SIP

    Hello

    I'm a very big dilemma. I have 1 Gbps connection to my ISP. I'm under BGP to establish connectivity with the provider PE.

    Just to inform you, I have redundant connections on the connection of 2 - Cisco 3750 (main & secondary link) next to service provider and there are 4 routers for 2 services (primary and secondary each for 2 services) now use on services - 1A applications increases and reaches 900 ~ 950 MB/s, is not on the impact of the services-2 I pushed the 2 services via secondary link traffic. I have attached ppt for some knowledge

    Until a few weeks back the use was about 750 in the direction of entry and 700 Mbps in the exit direction of the WAN port on the service routers 1, but now the use of entry began to reach 900 ~ 950 MB/s in the direction of entry.

    I have 400 7600 - SIP (void crack-5XGE-SPA) on the routers [services for Qos ] are related to the switches. I spoke with the service provider, and they said that they would consider more and while I thought to do the first aggregation of ports-2 between the provider of Service & 3750 switch device and an another 2-port aggregation between 3750 Switch & services-1 (Cisco7606) router.

    There is no problem to create aggregation Service Provider betn ports device & switch 3750. It does not go between 3750 & services-1 switch (Cisco7606) router according to Cisco aggregation port document being not supported on 7600-SIP 400.

    It takes time for the service provider to provide 10 port of concert. I WS-X 6548-GE-TX module Services-(Cisco7606) 1 router. So, I thought WS-X 6548-GE-TX router connection ports on the router with switch and create port channel between Them.But I wonder how would function QOS can be used.

    So I need a Council if WS - X 6548-GE-TX ports support QOS with Etherchannel.

    Your advice will be appreciated

    R.

    Valerie

    The 3750 is a layer 3 switch.  Could you change the design to allow links to layer 3 through him?

    What get a 10Gbe for the 3750 and your 7600 module (s)?

  • Supported SIP URI characters

    Hello

    I'm currently setting up interoperability between Cisco control VCS X7.1 and CUCM V7.1.3.

    The IPT dial plan consists of site prefixes and area codes that make up the full DN phones, this unique name is also starts with a #.

    For example #0044014761

    My problem is (I think), that # is a character in charge of SIP URI that is exposed in the deployment guide. I tried to use 35%, which is the ASCII value for #; Oddly enough, when you use that I can solve the alias against the CUCM SIP trunk, but when you attempt to dial for an endpoint, it fails.

    I know that my SIP trunk is OK, as I can carry 9.* by it on the break-out CUCM PSTN calls.

    Anyone encountered this problem before, or been able to work around it?

    Thank you, if

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

    For your reference, it was similar (quite well) discussion there, a month

    https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2152374?tstart=210.

  • How to disable the boot into single user mode SIP?

    Hi all

    My MacBook Pro (bought in May 2011, out of warranty at this stage) is not able to start. I think that the graphics card is dead, I can boot into single user mode and run the Apple Hardware Test (no problem found). I found this acticle (https://people.cam.cornell.edu/~zc227/extras/early2011mbp_graphics.html), but I can't follow the steps to start the Mac to avoid the AMD card, such as the SIP is activated (cannot move road file extensions).

    I can't boot into recovery mode, due to the inability to start the graphical mode. Any other way to disable SIP?

    Thanks in advance.

    Ana

    In the developers page: security configuration is stored in NVRAM, rather than in the file system itself. As a result, this configuration applies to all Mac OS X installations across the entire machine and persists through installations of OS X than Protection of the integrity of support system.

    To enable or disable the Protection of the integrity of the system, you must start on recovery OS and run the csrutil(1) command from the Terminal.

    Integrity https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204899 Protection System

    This command can be run without root privileges and will tell you whether or not the SIP is enabled.

    to find out whether the SIP is enabled or disabled, run

    status of csrutil

    to disable SIP:

    copy & paste the following and then press ENTER:

    csrutil disable

    To activate the SIP

    csrutil enable

    After activation or deactivation of the Protection of the integrity of the system on a machine, a reboot is required.

    There are some options here:

    NetBoot and NetInstall NetRestore requirements in OS X El Capitan - Apple Support

  • Cannot turn on FileVault 2: "some disc formats do not support the recovery partition" version of the OS - 10.11.4

    Hello

    I went to turn on FileVault encryption for the first time, and when I click on restart (by FileVault guests) I got a error message that says "FileVault can not be enabled for the drive. Some disc formats do not support the required encryption recovery partition. To use encryption, reinstall this version of Mac OS x on a reformatted drive. »

    I found an article from apple support for this problem with El Capitan who recommended first aid running in disk utility.  I tried this but then received the same error message.

    a little history:

    -Mac OS 10.11.4 installed running on the brand/model ADATA SP 550 SSD

    -This SSD is a 250 GB drive partitioned into two, with one of these partitions being my OS

    -J' ran this BONE of a Bay external thunderbolt

    -ssd is formatted as HFS journaling +.

    I am really confused about this error message and couldn't find much online about it.  I use a fairly recent OS install.  I installed the operating system clean and made all my preferences and install so that I can encrypt and then back up this pristine OS environment in time machine so that I could always go back to it on the line in case where things are bunk too upward.  I'd have to install yet another OS to clean and do all my long software installs and system preferences settings... SIP.  I don't know if that makes a difference, but this version of the OS that I have been cloned by superduper to this SSD partition.

    What is the brand of SSD that I?  Might that matter?  I appreciate all the comments.  I'm really scratching my head...

    Thank you very much

    To enable FileVault, you need a recovery partition, which you don't have. You can create one by reinstalling OS X.

    If you do not already have a current backup, please backup all data, and then reinstall the OS. * you don't need to erase the boot volume, and you won't need the backup unless something is wrong. If the system has been upgraded an earlier version of Mac OS X, you may need to the Apple ID and password to use.

    There are ways to back up a computer that is not fully functional. Ask if you need advice.

    If you installed the runtime Java distributed by Apple, and still need, you will need to reinstall it. It goes the same for Xcode. All other data will be preserved.

    Related support article refers to OS X 10.11 ("El Capitan"), but the procedure is the same for OS X 10.7 ("Lion") and later versions.

  • [SPA3102] SIP recording every hour with the 401 error and directly 12 OK

    Location: INET-ADSL modem in bridge mode-SPA3102.
    Problem: not really, everything seems to work, can dial in and out.
    But...
    Because I'm curious, I have a logserver of installation and checked what happened every hour of registration.

    What I see in the syslog hourly the 3102 made re - enroll by the SIP provider, but first I think 401 Unauthorized een 12 error and measured, I see an OK message.

    Seems weird to me.

    The same thing happens when I compose, firstly a 401 that OK.

    Can someone explain why the first attempt gives an error and how to avoid this?

    Some details of syslog:

    I replaced a text in the syslog:

    x.x.x.x is real My outside IP address.
    yyyyyyyyy = my local phone number including the area code, such as 31201234567, 31 = NL, 20 = codeZone for Amsterdam
    username = username by my SIP provider

    message 1:
    REGISTER SIP:SIP.poivy.com SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:5060; direction = z9hG4bK-2283ef7b
    From: + 31yyyyyyyyy ; tag = c85fff819484d288o0
    To: + 31yyyyyyyyy
    Call ID: [email protected]

    CSeq: 6104 REGISTRY
    Max-Forwards: 70
    Authorization: Digest username = "username", realm = "sip.poivy.com", nonce = "1663445546", uri = "sip:sip.poivy.com", algorithm = MD5 response = "c8c5b94c384559bb490b59b72be1c674"
    Contact: + 31yyyyyyyyy ; expires = 3600
    User-Agent: Linksys/SPA3102-3.3.6(GW)
    Content-Length: 0
    Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFICATION OPTIONS, see
    Support: x-sipura

    Message 2:
    SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:5060; direction = z9hG4bK-2283ef7b
    From: + 31yyyyyyyyy ; tag = c85fff819484d288o0
    To: + 31yyyyyyyyy
    Contact: sip:x.x.x.x:5060
    Call ID: [email protected]
    CSeq: 6104 REGISTRY
    Server: (very nice Sip Registrar/Proxy Server)
    Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, REGISTER, OPTIONS, INFO, MESSAGE
    WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm = "sip.poivy.com", nonce = "1667015687", algorithm = MD5
    Content-Length: 0

    Message 3:
    REGISTER SIP:SIP.poivy.com SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:5060; direction = z9hG4bK-4d7052c
    From: + 31yyyyyyyyy ; tag = c85fff819484d288o0
    To: + 31yyyyyyyyy
    Call ID: [email protected]

    CSeq: 6105 REGISTRY
    Max-Forwards: 70
    Authorization: Digest username = "username", realm = "sip.poivy.com", nonce = "1667015687", uri = "sip:sip.poivy.com", algorithm = MD5 response = "46f2176652c0ad8d27f8d3ad1cf72c24"
    Contact: + 31yyyyyyyyy ; expires = 3600
    User-Agent: Linksys/SPA3102-3.3.6(GW)
    Content-Length: 0
    Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFICATION OPTIONS, see
    Support: x-sipura

    Message 4:
    SIP/2.0 200 Ok
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:5060; direction = z9hG4bK-4d7052c
    From: + 31yyyyyyyyy ; tag = c85fff819484d288o0
    To: + 31yyyyyyyyy
    Contact: + 31yyyyyyyyy ; expires = 3600
    Call ID: [email protected]

    CSeq: 6105 REGISTRY
    Server: (very nice Sip Registrar/Proxy Server)
    Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, REGISTER, OPTIONS, INFO, MESSAGE
    Content-Length: 0

    @hw: thank you for your tip and your right on the spot!

    Never, ever, thought of this way of "logging" in a system and use delberatley an error response. With your tip, I thought that allows to read the RFC and found RFC 3665. This RFC describes the Protocol SIP basic call flow. And there he was, almost at the beginning of the real story on page 5! The protocol uses a command register which gives a message of 401 error back just to be sure to avoid security problems "man in the middle" (if I understand correctly). He present a challenge and you the answer to a totalizer new order including your answer on the challenge. Which will lead to an OK return the message.

    To resume: nothing weird, it is as expected. My curiosity is frankly satisfied. Another day with what I've learned something. Thank you.

  • Needed support replacing WRT610N

    I have more product Linksys here and tell everyone to use Linksys for years I have many items in cabnet do not use.

    Well I got a $$$ WRT610N and totally had problems and it all boils down internal the software of linksys. "I run all these on my home 2xDMA WRT610N 2200" Linksys ", WGA11B"Linksys"old XBOX, XBOX 360, Wii, 2xLaptops, 3xDesktops a webserver.

    The main problem is the Linksys SIP ACK block and my USB VOIP MagicJack linksys phone system completely dislike.

    Cisco set the correct programming to linksys team crew and keep the product linksys with a good reputation and I will stop using DD - WRT Firmware on your system. As I think it is quite sad that the pirates free make the firmware that works for my support while manufacturing fail to support standard products or option in the GUI of linksys.

    MBCMDR

    I am at a total loss and love hearing entered Linksys Rep.

    I've been a customer of Linksys with multi products and long term.  Why did your Firmware not updated or fixed quickly? Why I ask this, because now I'm using dd - wrt firmware because linksys doesn't have support while DD - WRT offer support free firmware for a product they manufacture. They have a general forum like Linksys and you specify your problem. If you have any type of problem, even minor indicate you this in the Ant there they replcate it and write a fix. I know especially they relies to support extra, optiondans GUI to make things don't not necessary but some soft elements.

    I don't have the problem of the WRT610N do it yourself resets on own for no reason even after he did with Linksys FW_WRT610N_1.00.02.10_US_20090121_code.bin, I have more problem ACK SIP with my VOIP. ETC.

    Now under DD - WRT V24 - 11886_mega - WRT610N.bin Yes, they jump release numbers, but at least they offer firmware for my system and multi other routers.

  • SIP message with 488 here is not Acceptable

    Hello, I'm having this problem. I have read the documentation and I look in this forum for similar problems.
    Seems is a Codec problem. Service provider asks a g711alaw. However, I already change the codec, transcoder configured which is register with handler calls and everything seems fine. But outgoing calls always give this error. Can someone help me?

    Here's the part of my configuration:

    Send-call voice alert

    convert-discpi-to-prog voice calls

    voice, send rtp-received

    voip phone service

    list of approved IP addresses

    IPv4 10.20.1.0 255.255.255.0

    h323 connections allow h323

    allow connections h323 to SIP

    allow connections sip h323

    allow sip to sip connections

    service additional h450.12

    Fax protocol t38 ls-redundancy version 0 0 hs-redundancy 0 help none

    H323

    No keepalive timeout h225

    SIP

    midcall-signalling passthru

    SCCP local GigabitEthernet0/1

    SCCP ccm 10.20.1.5 identifier 2 priority 2 version 7.0

    SCCP ccm 10.20.1.6 identifier 1 priority 1 version 7.0

    SCCP

    !

    SCCP ccm Group 1

    associate the ccm 1 priority 1

    the associated profile 1 registry COMPcode

    the associated profile 2 registry COMP01-PSG

    !

    transcode dspfarm profile 1

    Codec g711ulaw

    Codec g711alaw

    Codec g729ar8

    Codec g729abr8

    Codec g729r8

    Codec g729br8

    maximum sessions 14

    associate the PCRS application

    !

    dspfarm profile 2 PSG

    Codec g711ulaw

    maximum sessions 120 software

    associate the PCRS application

    !

    Dial-peer voice voip 50

    Description # calls of CUCM to VG #.

    incoming called number 9.T

    DTMF-relay h245 alphanumeric

    Codec g711alaw

    No vad

    !

    Dial-peer voice 11 voip

    Description * outgoing SIP Trunk call *.

    outgoing SIP CALLS OUT translation-profile

    preference 1

    destination-model 9 t

    Setup progress_ind allow 3

    progress_ind enable progress 8

    progress_ind connect enable 8

    redirect ip2ip

    session protocol sipv2

    session target ipv4:88.XXX. XX.XXX

    DTMF-relay rtp - nte cisco-rtp

    Codec g711alaw

    No vad

    The Sip Trunk on the call manager uses a MRGL both of PSG and XCODE.

    SCCP Admin State: to the TOP
    Gateway local Interface: GigabitEthernet0/1
    IPv4 address: 10.20.1.11
    Port number: 2000
    IP precedence: 5
    List of Codec hidden user: no
    Call Manager: 10.20.1.5, Port number: 2000
    Priority: 2, Version: 7.0, identifier: 2
    Call Manager: 10.20.1.6, Port number: 2000
    Priority: 1, Version: 7.0, identifier: 1

    Transcoding of Oper status: ACTIVE - reason Code: NO

    Here are the two him debugs:

    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.859: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    GUEST sip:[email protected]/ * /: SIP-5060/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.20.1.6:5060; branch = z9hG4bK148c5e3b74ba77
    From: <> [email protected]/ * */>;tag=1130165~6e3f6e1b-b59e-4604-be6a-d6295dc18cf6-45522220
    To: <> [email protected]/ * / >
    Date: Monday, December 3, 2012 12:02:40 GMT
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    Supported: timer, resource-priority, replaces
    Min - SE: 1800
    User-Agent: Cisco - CUCM8.6
    Allow: PROMPT, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, ACK, CANCEL, PRACK, UPDATE, VIEW, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
    CSeq: INVITE 101
    Expires: 180
    Allow-events: presence, kpml
    Support: X-cisco-srtp-relief
    Support: geolocation
    Call-Info: ; method = "NOTIFY; Telephone-event = event; duration = 500 "
    Cisco-Guid: 1422849408-0000065536-0000391810-0100733962
    Session time-out: 1800
    P has asserted-Identity: <> [email protected]/ * / >
    Remote-Party-ID: <> [email protected]/ * / >; left = call; screen = yes; intimacy = off
    Contact: <> [email protected]/ * /: 5060; transport = tcp >
    Max-Forwards: 70

    Content-Length: 0

    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/54CEF5800005/CCAPI/cc_api_display_ie_subfields:
    cc_api_call_setup_ind_common:
    Cisco-username = 02036666666
    -ccCallInfo IE subfields-
    Cisco-ani = 02036666666
    Cisco-anitype = 0
    Cisco-aniplan = 0
    Cisco-anipi = 0
    Cisco-anisi = 1
    dest = 907718005555
    Cisco-desttype = 0
    Cisco-destplan = 0
    Cisco-ISDS = FFFFFFFF
    Cisco-rdn =
    Cisco-rdntype = 0
    Cisco-rdnplan = 0
    Cisco-rdnpi =-1
    Cisco-rdnsi =-1
    Cisco-redirectreason = - 1 fwd_final_type = 0
    final_redirectNumber =
    hunt_group_timeout = 0

    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/54CEF5800005/CCAPI/cc_api_call_setup_ind_common:
    Interface = 0 x 31196458, call Info)
    Number = 02036666666, (Calling Name =) (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown, screening = User, spent, presentation = allowed).
    Called number = 907718005555 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown).
    The appeal translated = FALSE, Subscriber Type Str = unknown, FinalDestinationFlag = TRUE,
    Incoming dial-peer = 50, progress Indication = NULL (0), Calling THE Present = TRUE,
    Road Trkgrp Label source, label Trkgrp road target = CLID Transparent = FALSE), call Id = 21355
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/54CEF5800005/CCAPI/ccCheckClipClir:
    In: Component number = 02036666666 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown, screening = User, spent, presentation = allowed)
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/54CEF5800005/CCAPI/ccCheckClipClir:
    Departures: Component number = 02036666666 (TONE = unknown, NPI = unknown = User, spent, screening presentation allowed =)
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_get_feature_vsa:

    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: cc_get_feature_vsa success of malloc
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_get_feature_vsa:

    * 12:08:32.863 3 dec: cc_get_feature_vsa number is 1
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_get_feature_vsa:

    * 12:08:32.863 3 dec: FEATURE_VSA attributes are: feature_name:0, feature_time:832856160, feature_id:21306
    * 12:08:32.863 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_setup_ind_common:
    Set up the event sent;
    Call Info (number = 02036666666 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown, screening = User, spent, presentation = allowed),)
    Called number = 907718005555 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown))
    * 12:08:32.863 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_process_call_setup_ind:
    Event = 0x2AFCEB88
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.863: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_setupind_match_search:
    Try again with the demoted called number 907718005555
    * 12:08:32.863 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallSetContext:
    Context = 0x32D52B8C
    * 12:08:32.863 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_process_call_setup_ind:
    > Handed CCAPI cid 21355 with tag 50 app '_ManagedAppProcess_Default '.
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallProceeding:
    Progress Indication = NULL (0)
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallSetupRequest:
    Destination =, Calling IE date = TRUE, Mode = 0.
    Leaving Dial-peer = 11, Params = 0x2B62716C, Indication of progress = FROM SIDE IS NO ISDN (3)
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCheckClipClir:
    In: Component number = 02036666666 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown, screening = User, spent, presentation = allowed)
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCheckClipClir:
    Departures: Component number = 02036666666 (TONE = unknown, NPI = unknown = User, spent, screening presentation allowed =)
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallSetupRequest:
    The destination model = 9 t., called number = 07718009863, band numbers = FALSE
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallSetupRequest:
    Number = 02036666666 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown, screening = User, spent, presentation = allowed).
    Called number = 07718009863 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown).
    Redirect = number, display of information is
    Account number 02036666666, Destination = final = TRUE flag,.
    GUID = 54CEF580-0001-0000-0005-FA820601140A, outbound Dial-peer = 11
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_display_ie_subfields:
    ccCallSetupRequest:
    Cisco-username = 02036666666
    -ccCallInfo IE subfields-
    Cisco-ani = 02036666666
    Cisco-anitype = 0
    Cisco-aniplan = 0
    Cisco-anipi = 0
    Cisco-anisi = 1
    dest = 07718009863
    Cisco-desttype = 0
    Cisco-destplan = 0
    Cisco-ISDS = FFFFFFFF
    Cisco-rdn =
    Cisco-rdntype = 0
    Cisco-rdnplan = 0
    Cisco-rdnpi =-1
    Cisco-rdnsi =-1
    Cisco-redirectreason = - 1 fwd_final_type = 0
    final_redirectNumber =
    hunt_group_timeout = 0

    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccIFCallSetupRequestPrivate:
    Interface = 0 x 31196458, Type of Interface = 3, = Destination, the Mode = 0x0,
    Call Params (number = 02036666666, (Calling Name =) (= unknown, NPI = unknown, screening = User, TON spent, presentation = allowed),)
    Called number = 07718009863 (TON = unknown, NPI = unknown), the appeal translated = FALSE,
    Subscriber Type Str = unknown, FinalDestinationFlag = TRUE, outgoing Dial-peer = 11, Call On County = FALSE,
    Trkgrp road Label source, label of road target Trkgrp =, tg_label_flag = 0, Application Call Id =)
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.867: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_get_feature_vsa:

    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.867: cc_get_feature_vsa success of malloc
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.867: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_get_feature_vsa:

    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: cc_get_feature_vsa number is 2
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.867: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_get_feature_vsa:

    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: FEATURE_VSA attributes are: feature_name:0, feature_time:832857952, feature_id:21307
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccIFCallSetupRequestPrivate:
    Application for facility call SPI's success; Interface type = 3, FlowMode = 1
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallSetContext:
    Context = 0x2B62711C
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccSaveDialpeerTag:
    Outbound Dial-peer = 11
    * 12:08:32.867 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_proceeding:
    Interface = 0 x 31196458, Indication = NULL (0) progress
    * 12:08:32.871 3 dec: / / 21356/54CEF5800005/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Envoy:
    GUEST sip:[email protected] / * /.XXX:5060 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 194.168.146.148:5060; branch = z9hG4bK4F1C77
    Remote-Party-ID: <> [email protected]/ * / >; left = call; screen = yes; intimacy = off
    From: <> [email protected]/ * / >; tag = E448A58-A24
    To: <> [email protected] / * /.XXX >
    Date: Monday, December 3, 2012 12:08:32 GMT
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    Supported: timer, resource-priority, replaces, sdp-anat
    Min - SE: 1800
    Cisco-Guid: 1422849408-0000065536-0000391810-0100733962
    User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS - 12.x
    Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, VIEW, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER
    CSeq: INVITE 101
    Time stamp: 1354536512
    Contact: <> [email protected]/ * /: 5060 >
    Expires: 180
    Allow-events: telephone-event
    Max-Forwards: 69
    Session time-out: 1800
    Content-Length: 0

    * 12:08:32.871 3 dec: / / 21355/54CEF5800005/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Envoy:
    SIP/2.0 100 trying
    Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.20.1.6:5060; branch = z9hG4bK148c5e3b74ba77
    From: <> [email protected]/ * */>;tag=1130165~6e3f6e1b-b59e-4604-be6a-d6295dc18cf6-45522220
    To: <> [email protected]/ * / >
    Date: Monday, December 3, 2012 12:08:32 GMT
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    CSeq: INVITE 101
    Allow-events: telephone-event
    Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS - 12.x
    Content-Length: 0

    * 12:08:32.899 3 dec: / / 21356/54CEF5800005/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    SIP/2.0 100 trying
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 194.168.146.148:5060; received = 194.168.146.148; branch = z9hG4bK4F1C77
    From: <> [email protected]/ * / >; tag = E488A58-A24
    To: <> [email protected] / * /.XXX >
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    CSeq: INVITE 101
    Time stamp: 1354536512
    Content-Length: 0

    * 12:08:32.995 3 dec: / / 21356/54CEF5800005/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    SIP/2.0 488 here is not Acceptable
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 194.168.146.148:5060; received = 194.168.146.148; branch = z9hG4bK4F1C77
    To: <> [email protected] / * /.XXX >; tag = 3563525093-836070
    From: <> [email protected]/ * / >; tag = E488A58-A24
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    CSeq: INVITE 101
    Allow: CANCEL, ACK, INVITE, BYE, OPTIONS, REGISTER, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, UPDATE, MESSAGE, PUBLISH
    Contact: <> [email protected] / * /.XXX:5060 >
    Reason: Q.850; cause = 65
    Content-Length: 0

    * 12:08:32.995 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_disconnected:
    Value = 127, Interface = 0 x 31196458, Call Id = 21356
    * 12:08:32.995 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_disconnected:
    Call the entry (Responsed = TRUE, Cause value = 127, Retry Count = 0)
    * 12:08:32.995 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallReleaseResources:
    free xcoding reserved resource.
    * 12:08:32.995 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallSetAAA_Accounting:
    = 0, Id = 21356 Call Accounting
    * 12:08:32.995 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallDisconnect:
    Value = 127, Tag = 0x0, entry calls (previous disconnection Cause = 0, remove the Cause = 127)
    * 12:08:32.995 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallDisconnect:
    Value = 127, entered calls (Responsed = TRUE, Cause value = 127)
    * 12:08:32.999 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_disconnect_done:
    Available = 0, Interface = 0 x 31196458, Tag = 0 x 0, Call Id 21356 =.
    Call the entry (disconnect Cause = 127, class voice Cause Code = 0, retry count = 0)
    * 12:08:32.999 3 dec: / / 21356, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_disconnect_done:
    Call interrupted event sent
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.999: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_free_feature_vsa:

    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.999: cc_free_feature_vsa release A 31, 46758
    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.999: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_free_feature_vsa:

    * 3 Dec 12:08:32.999: free vsacount is 1
    * 12:08:32.999 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallDisconnect:
    Value = 127, Tag = 0x0, entry calls (previous disconnection Cause = 0, remove the Cause = 0)
    * 12:08:32.999 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, ccCallDisconnect:
    Value = 127, entered calls (Responsed = TRUE, Cause value = 127)
    * 12:08:32.999 3 dec: / / 21355/54CEF5800005/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Envoy:
    SIP/2.0 500 Internal Server Error
    Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.20.1.6:5060; branch = z9hG4bK148c5e3b74ba77
    From: <> [email protected]/ * */>;tag=1130165~6e3f6e1b-b59e-4604-be6a-d6295dc18cf6-45522220
    To: <> [email protected]/ * / >; tag = E488ADC-CEC
    Date: Monday, December 3, 2012 12:08:32 GMT
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    CSeq: INVITE 101
    Allow-events: telephone-event
    Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS - 12.x
    Reason: Q.850; cause = 127
    Content-Length: 0

    * 3 Dec 12:08:33.035: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    SIP ACK:[email protected]/ * /: SIP-5060/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.20.1.6:5060; branch = z9hG4bK148c5e3b74ba77
    From: <> [email protected]/ * */>;tag=1130165~6e3f6e1b-b59e-4604-be6a-d6295dc18cf6-45522220
    To: <> [email protected]/ * / >; tag = E488ADC-CEC
    Date: Monday, December 3, 2012 12:02:40 GMT
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    Max-Forwards: 70
    CSeq: 101 ACK
    Allow-events: presence, kpml
    Content-Length: 0

    * 12:08:33.039 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_disconnect_done:
    Available = 0, Interface = 0 x 31196458, Tag = 0 x 0, Call Id = 21355.
    Call the entry (disconnect Cause = 127, class voice Cause Code = 0, retry count = 0)
    * 12:08:33.039 3 dec: / / 21355, 54CEF5800005, CCAPI, cc_api_call_disconnect_done:
    Call interrupted event sent
    * 3 Dec 12:08:33.039: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_free_feature_vsa:

    * 3 Dec 12:08:33.039: cc_free_feature_vsa release A 31, 46058
    * 3 Dec 12:08:33.039: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_free_feature_vsa:

    * 3 Dec 12:08:33.039: free vsacount is 0
    * 3 Dec 12:08:33.039: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Envoy:
    SIP ACK:[email protected] / * /.XXX:5060 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 194.168.146.148:5060; branch = z9hG4bK4F1C77
    From: <> [email protected]/ * / >; tag = E488A58-A24
    To: <> [email protected] / * /.XXX >; tag = 3563525093-836070
    Date: Monday, December 3, 2012 12:08:32 GMT
    Call ID: [email protected] / * /
    Max-Forwards: 70
    CSeq: 101 ACK
    Allow-events: telephone-event
    Content-Length: 0

    Thank you very much

    Chris

    Hi Chris,

    It seems that your CUBE config is correct. The CUCM sends a PROMPT to provide at the beginning now. This means that you have enabled the PSG on the SIP trunk. The codec sent in the INVITATION is G711ulaw. In order to change this, go to the SIP trunk and search "PSG preferred from Codec" and replace it by default of G711ulaw, G711alaw. If all goes well, which does the trick for you.

    HTH.

    Kind regards

    Stefano.

  • PEI - SIP - CME - SIP - error CUCM Media is not Acceptable

    Hello world

    I have a problem with a TRUNK of SIP ITSP, the question is apparently "SIP/2.0 488 not acceptable media.

    I tried several things, I Don t know how to solve this problem.

    Outgoing calls is already OK, the problem is with incoming calls: of the ITSP to the CUCM.

    I have this topology of the ITSP SIP TRUNK:

    ITSP - sip sip - CME - CUCM

    The CME configuration is:

    Dial-peer voice voip 67
    Description * SIP trunk ITSP *.
    destination-model 591 [67]...
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4:172.17.0.13
    session udp transport
    voice-class sip forced early offer
    no interaction of dtmf
    Codec g711ulaw

    !

    Dial-peer voice voip 68
    Description * SIP trunk CUCM *.
    reply-to address. T
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4:172.16.6.3
    voice-class sip forced early offer
    Codec g711ulaw

    !

    SIP - ua
    Disable-early-media 180
    connection-reuse

    !

    voip phone service
    list of approved IP addresses
    IPv4 0.0.0.0
    IPv4 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    h323 connections allow h323
    allow connections h323 to SIP
    allow connections sip h323
    allow sip to sip connections
    no service additional h450.7
    no additional service moved temporarily sip
    no service additional sip refer
    Fax protocol t38 ls-redundancy version 0 0 hs-redundancy 0 help none
    SIP
    binding control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.5
    bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.5
    Registrar Server
    offer-early forced

    !

    On the side of CUCM:

    End point of media (checked)
    Disable the media beginning on 180 (unchecked)
    Requires the idle exchange of SDP for call Media Change (checked)
    Early support for voice and video calls (checked)
    Send send-receive SDP appealed INVITES (checked)

    The result of "debug messages ccsip" and "debug dialpeer inout voice" is:

    001062: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    GUEST sip:[email protected]/ * /: 5060; user = phone SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.17.0.11:5060; branch = z9hG4bKi2mhl410do70mrc4s141.1
    Call ID: [email protected]/ * /.
    From: "70965999"<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = 2u2uavrx-CC-1013
    To: '69200020'<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >
    CSeq: 1 INVITE
    Max-Forwards: 69
    Contact:
    Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, INFO, BYE PRACK, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, UPDATE
    P - asserted-Identity has:
    Supported: 100rel, histinfo, prerequisite
    P-early-Media: support
    Content-Length: 362
    Content-Type: application/sdp

    v = 0
    o = HuaweiSoftx3000 1102026905 1102026906 IN IP4 172.17.0.11
    s = SipCall
    c = IN IP4 172.17.0.11
    t = 0 0
    m = audio RTP/AVP 8 18 116 10386
    a = rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
    a G729/8000 rtpmap:18 =
    a rtpmap:116 telephone-event/8000 =
    a = ptime:5
    a = sendrecv local curr:qos
    a = distance zero curr:qos
    a = sendrecv local compulsory are: qos
    a = sendrecv distance optional with: qos
    a = 3gOoBTC

    001063: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
    Number = 69200020, called number = 69200020, Peer Info Type = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
    001064: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
    Associate the rule of = DP_MATCH_DEST; Called number = 69200020
    001065: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
    No outbound dial-peer does not; Result = NO_MATCH(-1)
    001066: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
    dialstring = 69200020, saf_enabled = 1 saf_dndb_lookup = 1, dp_result =-1
    001067: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:
    Result = NO_MATCH(-1)
    001068: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
    Number = 70965999, called number =, Voice-Interface = 0 x 0.
    Timeout = TRUE, Peer Encap Type = ENCAP_VOIP, Type of research peer = PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
    Peer Type Info = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
    001069: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
    Result = Success (0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming dial-peer = 68
    001070: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
    dialstring = NULL, saf_enabled = 0, saf_dndb_lookup = 0, dp_result = 0
    001071: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
    Number = 70965999, called number =, Voice-Interface = 0 x 0.
    Timeout = TRUE, Peer Encap Type = ENCAP_VOIP, Type of research peer = PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
    Peer Type Info = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
    001072: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
    Result = Success (0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming dial-peer = 68
    001073: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
    dialstring = NULL, saf_enabled = 0, saf_dndb_lookup = 0, dp_result = 0
    001074: 03:31:03: //-1/CD12136099D5/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
    Number = 70965999, called number = 69200020, Voice-Interface = 0 x 0.
    Timeout = TRUE, Peer Encap Type = ENCAP_VOIP, Type of research peer = PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
    Peer Type Info = DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
    001075: 03:31:03: //-1/CD12136099D5/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
    Result = Success (0) after DP_MATCH_ANSWER; Incoming dial-peer = 68
    001076: 03:31:03: //-1/CD12136099D5/DPM/dpMatchSafModulePlugin:
    dialstring = NULL, saf_enabled = 0, saf_dndb_lookup = 0, dp_result = 0
    SIP: Attempt to analyze the attribute not supported at the level of the media
    001077: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Envoy:
    SIP/2.0 488 Media is not Acceptable
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.17.0.11:5060; branch = z9hG4bKi2mhl410do70mrc4s141.1
    From: "70965999"<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = 2u2uavrx-CC-1013
    To: '69200020'<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = C139A0-1755
    Date: Thu, November 6, 2014 13:01:04 GMT
    Call ID: [email protected]/ * /.
    CSeq: 1 INVITE
    Allow-events: telephone-event
    Reason: Q.850; cause = 65
    Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-15.3.3.M2
    Content-Length: 0

    001078: 03:31:03: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:

    SIP GatewayTelf_JD #ACK:[email protected]/ * /: 5060; user = phone SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.17.0.11:5060; branch = z9hG4bKi2mhl410do70mrc4s141.1
    CSeq: 1 ACK
    Call ID: [email protected]/ * /.
    From: "70965999"<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = 2u2uavrx-CC-1013
    To: '69200020'<>[email protected]/ * /; transport = udp; user = phone >; tag = C139A0-1755
    Max-Forwards: 69
    Content-Length: 0

    Little light at the end of the tunnel?

    Thanks in advance!

    Hello

    can you collect debug voice ccapi inout & debugging ccsip GCE message and attach the logs here please?

    your provider sends A Law G711 codec in the PROMPT message, but you have configured G711 U right in the dial-peers.

    can you try to fix G711 has the right dial-peers and check out them? Also make sure you have TPMS in the MRGL applied to CUCM SIP Trunk.

  • What is SIP/2.0 481 call Leg/Transaction does not means?

    Hello

    When call cme of sip trunk and hang up the phone call calling debug ccsip show:

    Jun 2 08:52:40.541: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Info/ccsip_new_msg_preprocessor: invite dialog box control
    Jun 2 08:52:40.541: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Error/sipSPISipIncomingMsg: invalid (STATE_IDLE) method: CANCEL
    Jun 2 08:52:40.545: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Transport/sipSPISendErrorRespNoCCB: send error no. RCC response to the transport layer
    Jun 2 08:52:40.545: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Transport/sipSPITransportSendMessage: msg = 0x88D771A0, addr = 172.19.1.78, port = 5060, sentBy_port = 5060, is_req = 0, transport = 1, switch = 0, call = 0 x 00000000
    Jun 2 08:52:40.545: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Transport/sipConnectionManagerGetConnectionIfExists: support connection for addr = 172.19.1.78 not found
    CME(config-SIP-UA) #.
    Jun 2 08:52:40.545: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Transport/sipTransportPostSendMessage: display send msg = 0x88D771A0, addr = 172.19.1.78, port = 5060, connId = 0 for UDP
    Jun 2 08:52:40.553: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Envoy:
    SIP/2.0 481 call Leg/Transaction does not exist
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 77.72.169.134:5060; branch = z9hG4bK49b6543463d947caa1e4b81bf0267d24; received = 172.19.1.78
    From: <> [email protected] / * /: 5060 >; tag = 4e0113ac4c050c86452e9
    To: [email protected] / * / add: 5060 >
    Call ID: 4c4d940ab840442cb123a51a893cf5f5
    CSeq: 3 CANCEL
    Content-Length: 0

    Hello

    This means that the bridge is not no matter what record in the appeal. It was not any call or that it has removed the information.

    Looking at the extract, this particular msg was sent in response to cancel event. Without seeing the debug, I'm assuming that GW has previously received cancel and delete the call and send response. But on the side of appellant sent another msg so cancel gw gives above msg

    Hope this helps

    Thank you

    -abu

  • Incoming SIP - SP CUBE is not of translations

    Perplexed as to why the incoming calls from SIP service provider do not correspond to the translation in CUBE

    I have a number presented on the incoming CUBE SIP trunk and need to get rid of the figures for the last 3 numbers to present to the CUCM.  The test voice translation works, but it seems that the incoming number provided by the supplier is not hit or corresponding to the translation rule.

    Incoming dial peer config:

    Dial-peer voice voip 60
    Description incoming PSTN (elite) to the CUBE
    translation-profile entering EliteSIP-DDI-numbers-inbound
    session protocol sipv2
    incoming called number 44239...
    codec voice-class 1
    DTMF-relay rtp - nte sip-kpml
    No vad

    Profile and set the configuration of translation

    voice translation rule 44239
    rule 1 / ^ 442392006.
    rule 2 / ^ \+442392006/ / /.
    !
    !
    voice translation-profile EliteSIP-DDI-numbers-inbound
    definition of 44239 called

    The result of the translation:

    Matched with rule 2
    Original number: + 442392006339 translated number: 339
    Number of origin type: no number translation type: no
    Original number plan: no number plan translated: no

    BE6000S #test voice translation rule 44239 442392006339
    Matched with rule 1
    Original number: 442392006339 translated number: 339
    Number of origin type: no number translation type: no
    Original number plan: no number plan translated: no

    The translation of debugging output:

    Voice translation of BE6000S #debug
    VoIP translation rule debugging is enabled
    BE6000S #.
    SIP: Attempt to analyze the attribute not supported at the level of the media
    SIP: Attempt to analyze the attribute not supported at the level of the media
    065139: June 7 23:35:29.157: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_RegXruleNumInfo: stack = 0x3F5552E8; Count = 1
    065140: June 7 23:35:29.157: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: infonum = 0x421F2934
    065141: June 7 23:35:29.161: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_push_RegXruleNumInfo_internal: stack = 0x3F5552E8; Count = 1
    065142: June 7 23:35:29.161: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_RegXruleNumInfo: stack = 0x3F5552E8; Count = 1
    065143: June 7 23:35:29.161: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: infonum = 0x421F2934
    065144: June 7 23:35:29.161: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_push_RegXruleNumInfo_internal: stack = 0x3F5552E8; Count = 1
    065145: June 7 23:35:29.165: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/sed_subst: no match! number = matchPattern = id; [; ] * replacePattern$ id =
    065146: June 7 23:35:32.157: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: infonum = 0x0
    065147: June 7 23:35:32.169: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_RegXruleNumInfo: stack = 0x3F5552E8; Count = 1
    065148: June 7 23:35:32.169: //-1/5A562434A112/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: infonum = 0x421F2934

    Debug messages ccsip just to make sure the call come and the DNIS format (btw - which bit of the track to show the DNIS?)

    BE6000S #debug ccsip messages
    Call SIP tracing messages is enabled
    BE6000S #.
    065149: June 7 23:38:16.925: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    GUEST sip:[email protected]/ * /: SIP-5060/2.0
    Record-Route:
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 217.68.246.241:5060; branch = z9hG4bKe4be.24390fd700572c75f3247fa6444e9fcc.0
    Max-Forwards: 16
    To: <> [email protected]/ * /: 5060 >
    From: <> [email protected]/ * / >; tag = as6b74b830
    Call ID: [email protected]/ * /: 5050
    Contact: <> [email protected]/ * /: 5060 >
    CSeq: INVITE 102
    User-Agent: Elite hosted voice
    Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 23:38:14 GMT
    Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH
    Supported: replaces, timer
    X voipnow-did: + 442392006339
    X voipnow-extension: 0071 * 001
    X voipnow pbx: 3a5b131e3e
    X voipnow-infrastructureid: 92f21508
    X voipnow-did: + 442392006339
    Content-Type: application/sdp
    Content-Length: 520

    Ideas?

    Dear MEP,

    I think that if you add + to incoming called number, it should solve the problem as provider sends with +.

    Incoming called number + 44239...

    Also run dialpeer voip debug to see dial-peers are put in correspondence on incoming direction of ITSP.thanks

  • DTMF in SIP Trunk problem

    Hello

    I have a problem in case of detection of the DTMF

    We have a SIP of the ITSP Trunk and everything is ok except DTMF.

    The sip trunk is between ITSP and router 3945

    ITSP <->3945 <->CUCM 10.5

    I have try all method such as rtp - nte, h245 alphanumeric and h245-signal, info-sip, sip-kpml,... in line-peer to ITSPs

    ITSP say that he send with standard RFC2833 dtmf (it equals to rtp-net, I know), but when I am 'debug ccsip message', the results show the dtmf with rfc2833 sends us

    16 August 13:52:28.991: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    INVITE sip: [email protected] / * /: 5060. user = phone SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.105.40.34:5060; branch = z9hG4bKejhh8jixkobhnb7ykvi87vuj8
    Call ID: [email protected]/ * /.
    From: sip: [email protected] / * />; tag = c3cx3vcw-CC-40
    To: sip: [email protected] / * /; user = phone >
    CSeq: 1 INVITE
    Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, REGISTRY, PRACK, INFO SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, updates, MESSAGE, see
    Max-Forwards: 69
    Supported: 100rel, timer
    User-Agent: Huawei SoftX3000 V300R010
    Session time-out: 300
    Min - SE: 90
    Contact: sip: [email protected] / * /: 5060; user = phone >
    Content-Length: 374
    Content-Type: application/sdp
    v = 0
    o = HuaweiSoftX3000 11042757 11042757 IN IP4 10.105.40.34
    s = call Sip
    c = IN IP4 10.105.40.34
    t = 0 0
    m = audio 27762 RTP / AVP 8 0 18 4 2 98 99 102
    a = rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
    a = rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
    a G729/8000 rtpmap:18 =
    a = rtpmap:4 G723/8000
    a = rtpmap:2 G726-32/8000
    a = rtpmap:98 G726-40/8000
    a = rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000
    a = rtpmap:102 G726-24/8000
    a = ptime:20
    a = fmtp:18 annex b = No.
    It is a message to guest (with sdp) of ITSP
    As you can see the line with red color must have a code with number of 101 but rather a code with number of 18
    In my "ccsip media debug' output show that the method of negotiation between me and itsp 'incoming voice. '
    It's my router config:
    voip phone service
    No IP trust to authenticate
    allow connections h323 to SIP
    allow connections sip h323
    allow sip to sip connections
    SIP
    interface FastEthernet0/0/1 source control binding
    bind media source interface FastEthernet0/0/1
    min - to 300 session expires-300
    !

    Dial-peer voice 2 voip---> router CUCM and vice versa
    translation-profile outgoing toos
    destination-model 42584...
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4:10.20.30.70
    Codec g711ulaw
    DTMF-relay rtp - nte
    !
    VoIP voice 10 Dial - peer---> router for ITSP and vice versa
    destination-model. T
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4:10.105.40.34
    incoming called-number. T
    DTMF-relay rtp - nte
    Codec g711ulaw
    I have configured cucm with a sip section to my favorite router with active PSG and RFC2833
    BUT HE DIDN'T THERE WAS NO DETECTION OF DTMF IN INCOMING CALLS AND OUTGOING
    I even test dial-position 10 without any method of dtmf-relay because I want to configure it with the incoming voice method, but it does not work
    I change the codec but does not solve the problem
    There is an interesting point and that is, if use Elastix 3945 of the router and configure dtmf among elastix and itsp as "inbound" method and method dtmf among elastix and cucm as 'rfc2833' everything is OK (ITSP<--Inbound--> Elastix <--rfc2833-->CUCM)
    Please give me a solution to solve the problem between Cisco 3945 and ITSP
    Concerning

    It would be more accurate to say that the problem has been bypassed by using a transcoding resource. The correct resolution here would be to open a ticket to trouble with the ITSP. I agree that the PROMPT message you show doesn't include advertising RFC2833 in the SDP offer. It is a problem that only the carrier can rectify.

  • Writing own SIP Stack on BlackBerry

    Hello

    I am a newbie to BlackBerry and I want to develop a VoIP on BlackBerry client.

    I searched the forum and found that there is no support for SIP API.

    So the first step is to write my own SIP stack. I have several queries in my mind:

    1. Can I develop my own stack SIP on BlackBerry?
    2. What support can I get from the platform?
    3. I also analyzed that BlackBerry does not support codecs G.729/G.711 or it allows to install new ones. How do I get these codecs?
    4. Is there a RTP API or I need to write my own RTP stack?
    5. Are there restrictions on platform?
    6. What that all obstacles will face during this evolution?

    Anyone can guide me please on them.

    Thank you very much

    mansriv

    I'd be happy it and perhaps as it's possible, but it would take a lot of work, not a society that backup I would not take it.
    the blackberry platform is not very accessible to a low level. I don't know where to start without JSR180.

    RIM and Skype collaborate on a client, perhaps is that it shows a change in the policy of rims and they will support SIP?

    http://about.Skype.com/2009/03/skype_coming_to_blackberry_sma.html

  • No support for URI Scheme Expressway C

    Nice day!!

    A question that I have the next deployment

    Cluster Version 11 - Expressway CUCM C - Expressway E - Webex

    I realized the Collaboration meeting room guide and other deployments work but in this crackling SIP does not work.

    Areas - transformations - research rules - is fine but the Expressway C restore the call with the following message " 416 Expressway of the URI scheme does not support C ', I try to reconfigure everything except always show the same error." "

    No idea for the error? Thanks for your time!

    Most of these rules is written incorrectly and a lot will not or what you want them to do.  Have you tested the rules when you created to see if they would give you the required result with the related task to "Check if a pattern match or transform has the expected result" at the bottom of the web search page of rules?

    Your first snapshot DNS rule for CMR Cloud Services there nothing in parentheses in the pattern string, so the result of the replacement string will be invalid.

    The other, you're having a string of models with only two things in brackets and then by creating a result with three elements that will not work.

    You probably can replace both your rules with a single rule:

    Pattern string: (.+)@(.+)\.webex\.comPattern behaviour: ReplaceReplace string: \1@\2.webex.com
    Wayne - don't forget the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

Maybe you are looking for