For indexing loop (tables)

Similar Questions

• Possibility to use the Enum control as an index for the loop entry For

  Hello world

  I'm curious to know if an ENUM type could be an index entry for a loop For (in fact, I tried in labview but it did NOT work).

  I use Enum to my two configurations (only two elements), but sometimes I need to run the two together.

  I wonder if it has a good structure to manage it, or simply replace ENUM with table.

  Thank you

  -Kunsheng

  Here is an example of use of the nodes of property:

  

• write 1 d digital table in a binary file and start a new line or insert a separator for each loop writing file

  Hello:

  I'm fighting with digital table of 1 d writeing in a binary file and start a new line or insert a separator for each loop writing file. So for each loop, it runs, LABVIEW code will collect a table 1 d with 253 pieces of a spectrometer. When I write these tables in the binay file and the following stack just after the previous table (I used MATLAB read binary file). However whenever if there is missing data point, the entire table is shifted. So I would save that table 1-d to N - D array and N is how many times the loop executes.

  I'm not very familiar with how write binary IO files works? Can anyone help figure this? I tried to use the file position, but this feature is only for writing string to Bodet. But I really want to write 1 d digital table in N - D array. How can I do that.

  Thanks in advance

  lawsberry_pi wrote:

  So, how can I not do the addition of a length at the beginning of each entry? Is it possible to do?

  On top of the binary file write is a Boolean entry called ' Prepend/chain on size table (T) '.  It is default to TRUE.  Set it to false.

  Also, be aware that Matlab like Little Endian in LabVIEW by default Big Endian.  If you probably set your "endianness" on writing binary file as well.

• How to index a table on multiple sites?

  Hello

  How to index a table on multiple sites?

  I searched this issue and was not able to find the answer. I understand that it can be done with loops, but I don't know how.

  I use the detector of crete vi for frequency domain data collected a VNA (s2p) file. The products contain a table of amplitudes and a table of locations. The problem is that the locations refer to the index of table of amplitude, which is not the same as the frequency. My idea is that I can use this output of the places table to index the frequency to the detected peak frequencies table and then draw these, as well as some analysis data and manipulation on them. Currently, I can do this only by consulting table on the front panel.

  The entrance to the peak detector is currently a table 1 d of the scale (what is the problem?).

  I also looked at the supply frequency & estimate VI, but this VI seems only exit of scalar data for the largest peak, not exactly what I'm looking for.

  Thanks for your help.

  You have a second table for the tested frequency?  If so, then you are right that you just need to index this table with the indexes by the Ridge detector.  Use a loop for.  Automatic index to the index, use index in array to get the value of the frequency and autoindex on frequencies.

  

• What is the physical meaning of automatic indexing of table entry...

  What is the physical interpretation of the automatic indexing. ?

  You wire up a table on the edge of a loop, it sequentially will index the table for you as he travels the loops. A While loop will also do this, but it is much more common on loops For, therefore, loops For making automatically while the While loops must be 'right click' and said to the index in the array. Get it?

• sort of an index by table

  Hi all

  I have a button on a form to run reports,

  There is a tabular block that has names of patients and a check box,

  When a user check more than one box, baptisms of report,

  When you close the first report, the second runs and so on.

  the problem is that there is another element that maintains a number when you check in a patient,

  If you check a patient, then the element holder is (1).

  you check the second element holds (2),

  but you can check the second record so that the point spacers (1), then check the first records in the block, so the first record holds (2),

  When you click the button to run the reports,

  (2) will be held the first (1), and that's what I don't want to happen, I want to sort them.

  check who is the owner of one (1) works first, and who owns the tracks (2) second and so on.

  so

  I wrote this code in the button which runs reports, but is not what I want, it runs reports according to records not the numbers.

  declare
  V_PARM  PARAMLIST ;
       LST_REC NUMBER ;
      REQUEST_NUM NUMBER:=1;
     TYPE V_RECORD IS RECORD (V_VISIT_ID MR_PATIENT_VISITS.VISIT_ID%TYPE                         
     ,V_ORG_NO RC_PATIENT_EPISODES .ORGANIZATION_NO%TYPE
     ,V_NUM NUMBER);
    
     TYPE PRD_TYPE  IS TABLE OF  V_RECORD INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
     PRD_TABLE PRD_TYPE;
  BEGIN
      GO_ITEM('ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.PATIENT_FILE_NO') ;
      FIRST_RECORD ;
      LOOP
          IF :ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.CHECK_PAT = 'Y'
              THEN
             
              PRD_TABLE(:ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM).V_VISIT_ID  := :ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.VISIT_ID;
  
               PRD_TABLE(:ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM).V_ORG_NO := :ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.ORGANIZATION_NO;
  
               PRD_TABLE(:ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM).V_NUM  := :ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM;
              
              
    V_PARM := GET_PARAMETER_LIST('REPDATA');
    IF NOT ID_NULL(V_PARM) THEN
        DESTROY_PARAMETER_LIST(V_PARM);
    END IF;
    V_PARM := CREATE_PARAMETER_LIST('REPDATA'); 
    Add_Parameter(v_parm,'P_VISIT_ID'          ,TEXT_PARAMETER,    PRD_TABLE(:ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM).V_VISIT_ID);
    Add_Parameter(v_parm,'P_ORGANIZATION_NO'   ,TEXT_PARAMETER,PRD_TABLE(:ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM).V_ORG_NO);
    
    REQUEST_NUM := REQUEST_NUM +1;
    
    RUN_REPORT('MRSHTVIW',TO_NUMBER('1'),V_PARM ,'OCX_BLOCK.OCX'); 
    EXIT WHEN :SYSTEM.LAST_RECORD = 'TRUE' ;
    NEXT_RECORD ;
    ELSE
        EXIT WHEN :SYSTEM.LAST_RECORD = 'TRUE' ;
        NEXT_RECORD ;
        END IF ;
          END LOOP ;
      
  
  END;
  
  
  
    
     -------------------
  
  
  
  
  

  I want to sort the 'index by table' once he gets the data in it?

  or any other solution

  Many thanks to you all,.

  Thank God I solved it, it comes to the latest version of my code that solved the problem:

  
   DECLARE
       V_PARM PARAMLIST ; 
  
       TYPE ADT_REC_TYPE IS RECORD (V_VISIT_ID VARCHAR2(90) ,
       V_ORG_NO VARCHAR2(90)
       ) ;
       ADT_REC ADT_REC_TYPE ;
       TYPE ADT_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF ADT_REC_TYPE
       INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER  ;
       ADT_TAB ADT_TAB_TYPE ;
   BEGIN
        GO_BLOCK('ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT') ;
        FIRST_RECORD;
        LOOP
        IF :ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.CHECK_PAT = 'Y'
              THEN
          ADT_TAB(:ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM).V_VISIT_ID := :ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.VISIT_ID     ;
          ADT_TAB(:ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.NUM).V_ORG_NO   := :ALL_ADMITTED_PATIENT.ORGANIZATION_NO ; 
  
   END IF ; 
  
        EXIT WHEN :SYSTEM.LAST_RECORD = 'TRUE' ;
         NEXT_RECORD ;      
  
        END LOOP ; 
  
        FOR I IN ADT_TAB.FIRST .. ADT_TAB.LAST LOOP 
  
        V_PARM := GET_PARAMETER_LIST('REPDATA');
    IF NOT ID_NULL(V_PARM) THEN
        DESTROY_PARAMETER_LIST(V_PARM);
    END IF;
    V_PARM := CREATE_PARAMETER_LIST('REPDATA');  
  
    Add_Parameter(v_parm,'P_VISIT_ID'          ,TEXT_PARAMETER,    ADT_TAB(I).V_VISIT_ID);
    Add_Parameter(v_parm,'P_ORGANIZATION_NO'   ,TEXT_PARAMETER,ADT_TAB(I).V_ORG_NO);
    RUN_REPORT('MRSHTVIW',TO_NUMBER(:GLOBAL.LANGUAGE_ID),V_PARM ,'OCX_BLOCK.OCX');
  END LOOP ;
       END ; 
  

• pl - sql query with indexes per table

  Hello again,
  
  I'm stuck with this query, I want to display the full name of all employees, using the HR schema table.
  
  DECLARE
  Employee_table_struct TYPE IS an ARRAY OF
  HR. Employees.first_name%type
  INDEX OF DIRECTORY;
  
  employee_table employee_table_struct;
  
  Employee_cursor CURSOR IS
  SELECT first_name
  OF hr.employees;
  
  
  v_row NUMBER: = 1;
  BEGIN
  
  OPEN employee_cursor;
  
  LOOP
  OUTPUT WHEN employee_cursor % NOTFOUND;
  
  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (employee_table (v_row));
  
  -populated the next time the loop * /.
  v_row: = v_row + 1;
  END LOOP;
  
  CLOSE Employee_cursor;
  END;
  /
  
  Its gives me error saying:
  
  ORA-01403: no data found
  ORA-06512: at line 21
  
  Help, please
  Thank you

  Why not use a clear FOR the loop?
  It allows you to save saying stuff and it does the same thing, showing first_name for all employees:

  begin
    for rec in ( select first_name
                 from   hr.employees
               )
    loop
      dbms_output.put_line(rec.first_name);
    end loop;
  end;
  /
  

• TestStand blocks by "for each" loop

  TestStand crashes from time to time for unknown reasons. We believe that 'foreach' loops could be the reason. By replacing the "for each" loop with a loop and iterate using the index, the problem is solved.

  Is this a known problem in Teststand? Is it possible that this is resolved in Teststand 4.1 (we use 4.0.1)?

  Kind regards

  Jeroen Coulembier

  This looks exactly like a previous problem (98902) report, which has been fixed in 4.1.

• Partitioning or an index organized table. Suggestion required.

  Hi gurus,

  We decided to perfomance increase in customer table that has more than 100 million records

  {code}

  customer_id number,

  cust_name varchar,

  Date of Applied_date,

  City varchar (100)

  {code}

  This is the structure of the customer table.

  We decided to composite partition the table based on date (range) applied and customer_id (hash).

  I am confused to go with table index (where tables and indexes are stored together) for better performance.

  Please suggest what we I'm going?  for best performance.

  Please answer

  Supersen

  If the query predicate (WHERE clause) include the Partition key column, Oracle can make the size of Partition - that is to say identify the target Partition.  Otherwise, he would have to do a full Table Scan because he doesn't know what Partition the target Row (s) is in.

  For example, if you are partitioning by APPLIED_DATE but your request is on the table by CITY, Oracle cannot identify the target Partition and do a Scan of Table full - even if you subpartition by CUSTOMER_ID and integrate CUSTOMER_ID in your query, Oracle cannot identify the Subpartition because it cannot identify the Partition.

  Hemant K Collette

• How to change the PCTFREE parameter for an existing table

  How to change the PCTFREE parameter for an existing table?
  
  Guys can you help me please

  Hello

  Of course it is possible.
  In this case you would export the table from the database (using old style exp)
  Start the import with the index_file option to generate the table/index instructions
  Modify the file created and updated the PCTFREE and remove any that need to be performed (default, if I remember correctly, he comments on the statements of the Index)
  Run the file for the table and the index created
  After that start the import with the option "ignore = yes".

  Make sure that you export only this particular table using "tables =
  Also in importing the "ignore = yes" will also be important data that still exists.

  In my view, however, this is not what you want to do. It's more complex, sensitive failure and the table should be deleted, so users are affected unnecessarily long.

  Success!
  FJFranken

• Recovery of the records by using the Ref Cursor or indexes per Table (which is better)

  Hi all
  
  I am interested to know if there is a performance (or other) advantages to return a result set from an Oracle stored procedure for a client application (for example, in Java) by using a Ref Cursor or Index by Table, respectively. Most of the people I met who know Java seem to use a Ref Cursor but did not say why this method is preferable. I'm not too familiar with Java and do not have the opportunity to test the difference between either method, but I am very interested in the other user forum about this view, gauging
  
  Kind regards
  
  Kevin.

  KevinFitz wrote:
  Hi zerathul,

  Thanks for the quick and helpful response. A REF CURSOR would be the best solution if the same set of results (content and number of records returned) should be dealt with by the application of the 'customer '. I'm guessing that maybe in this situation 'theoretical' that there might be less network traffic to return the set of results through an associative array,

  Kind regards

  Kevin.

  Yes, it would always be the best solution, because an associative array would mean collecting all the data in memory of expensive PGA on the database server before they pass any return on the network, while a fair Ref cursor is to feed the data over the network (maybe a little extra load, but you were unlikely to notice). Also the client application would treat a ref as of rows returned cursor data recovery and could treat them upon their arrival, an associative array is a collection of data which will then be entirely spent before any treatment could be done and then the treatment should go through the entire table to do.

  REF CURSOR will also provide other information such as the error codes etc regarding SQL if necessary. If you get an error when filling a table on the side of the database, it is not so easy to recover this error to the client.

  REF CURSOR is designed for this purpose. Use them.

• For a single table import failed...

  Hello
  On the production server, I reported a user db, let's call it PRD_USER, with tablespace PRD_TBL default.
  On the development server, I reported a user db, let's call it PRD_USER, with tablespace DEV_TBL default.
  On the production server, I use the db of exp utility to import as:
  IMP System/Manager of the user PRD_USER touser = PRD_USER = ignore = file_name = «...» ' log = «...» ».
  Succeeds the import for about 25 tables and indexes and constraints, but it fails for a single table with the error: {I don't remember the error ORA- and I do not have access currently} DEV_TBL tablespace does not exist.
  
  Of course this tablespace does not exist on production env. But how this problem arises because the default tablespace for the user is not DEV_TBL but PRD_TBL...?
  
  Do you have any idea what can be the cause and how can I overcome this problem when importing...? {Note: I gave a temporary solution... take the table creation sql script leaving aside the reference of the tablespace "DEV_TBL"}.
  
  The two servers work in exactly the same version of DB...
  Note: I use DB 10g v.2
  
  Thank you
  SIM

  If the table has Partitions, import strives to create the Partitions (in the CREATE TABLE statement) on the original table space.

  OR there is a LOB segment in the table import strives to create on the original table space.

  Hemant K Collette

• Delete Performance index organized Tables

  Hello
  
  We are experiencing some performance problems with one of our tables.
  
  We have a table (test), which contains 9 columns:
  
  A number (10) not null not pk,.
  B number (10),
  C number (10),
  D number (10),
  E number (10),
  F varchar2 (30),
  F varchar2 (2),
  G varchar2 (2),
  H varchar2 (250).
  
  The table test is an ITO (Index Organized Table) in configuration of default ITO.
  All columns are often necessary for we can not all overflows.
  
  The table has currently 8 m records, which is roughly 1/2 years of a data value, so insignificant.
  Inserts and updates are fine, but it takes 40 + seconds to delete a single line!
  
  (remove test where a = 3043 ;))
  
  If I convert this table in a standard table, deletes are only 0.5 of a second?
  
  No idea why the delete statement takes an excessively long time on the IOT, or what I could do wrong?
  
  Thank you
  Victoria
  
  Oracle Enterprise version 10.2.0.1.0
  Oracle XE version 10.2.0.1.0

  It seems as if the PK on this table of ITO is referenced by a FK on a child table (big enough) but the FK does not have an associated index.

  Deleting a line in this table, Oracle is required to perform a FTS on the child table to make sure that there is no matching FK.

  Find out if you have indeed a FK that refers to this table, and if CF is indexed.

  Just a guess, of course. A long track during the delete operation should be noted where Pio come just to be sure.

  See you soon

  Richard Foote
  http://richardfoote.WordPress.com/

• Why loops run after that assignment of processors for timed loops?

  I have 256 call loops of two frames in my code. When I execute the code without affecting processors only 128 call loop runs at the same time, however when I attribute a different processor to each of them (0-255) then only 4 runs at the same time. Why is this? How can I make all run simultaneously?

  Attached: two snapshots of the code. 1 shows a small portion of the call loops, and the other is the part of code that communicates with an FPGA VI which controls the status of the outputs (using a CRio-9066.) For call loops, the small Sun icon is a Subvi, which generates values for the time delay dt call loops.

  doug333 wrote:

  They run on the computer VI and I don't know how many processors available I!

  Windows?  If this is the case, don't bother with call loops.  They add overhead and you're very unlikely to get something from him.  Even basic affinity rarely helps.  Normal just use While loop with a ms funtion in here waiting.

• Win 7 to wait for indexing status never ends

  Win 7 to wait for indexing status never ends

  Cannot use outlook 2010 mail filters all inactive when displayed Ribbon except + (More) search icon

  Hi Bill,

  Thanks for posting your question in the Microsoft Community forum. I understand that indexing status never ends. I would like to help solve you the problem.

  Before troubleshooting, provide us with information.

  1. What is the brand and model of the computer?

  2. what security software is installed?

  3. is the question confined to the indexing status?

  4. don't you make changes to the computer before the show?

  This problem can be caused by some incompatible system files associated with indexing. Follow these methods:

  Method 1.

  Open the search and indexing Troubleshooter: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Open-the-Search-and-Indexing-troubleshooter

  Method 2.

  1. go to control panel and look for 'Features' in programs and features.

  2. click on "Turn Windows features on or off".

  3. uncheck the search of Windows and restart as required.

  4. go to c:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Search\Data\Applications and rename the folder Windows at Windows_ORIG.

  5. return to the search function of Windows to make it back on (see steps 1 and 2).

  6. restart as required.

  Method 2.

  I suggest that you can exercise SFC scan and check if that helps. The SFC/SCANNOW command analyzes all protected system files and replaces incorrect versions with appropriate Microsoft versions.

  For more information how to make SFC / scan, please follow this link: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929833

  Method 3.

  Run a full scan of the computer with the Microsoft Safety Scanner to make sure that the computer is virus-free.

  Microsoft Safety Scanner: http://www.microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Security Scanner warning: there will be data loss through an analysis using the Microsoft safety scanner to eliminate viruses as appropriate.

  You can ask your question related to Outlook 2010 here: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2010-outlook?tab=all&tm=1363676957004

  Let us know if you need help with this question, we will be happy to offer you our help.