Gigabit throughput

Hello

I have a Cisco 2960 switch. A test, I've connected two computers Windows XP on ports Gigabit - no other computers are connected to the switch. And the Windows XP machine and the switch has confirmed that the connection is Gigabit. I shared a folder on the same machine and transferred files (about 3 GB) on to the other machine. Maximum transfer rate I got was only about 190 Kbps? Is this normal? I wasn't expecting to get full Gigabit transfer, but also, I didn't be like that? What do you think of this? Does anyone have a similar experience? Thank you.

"When I tested it on the Gigabit ports - I didn't really expect the full bandwidth Gigabit - but I think 190 Mbps is much too slow."

Not necessarily. Gig network speeds, make a copy of the actual file, the read/write supported drive speeds can come into play. If can bus performance of hardware NIC, NETWORK, performance PC card driver performance, fresh General OS, fragmentation of the disk, file copy Protocol, etc. There is also the loss of bandwidth of overloading of the network, the headers of L2/L3/L4 and L2 time (especially for the Gig Ethernet).

If you try a traffic generator application, I think allows you to see a boost in speed.

Tags: Cisco Network

Similar Questions

  • Encryption of Gigabit

    Hi all

    I'm looking for a Cisco router (preferably) for a design I have write

    who is able to carry out a Gigabit throughput and IPSEC encryption

    at this rate.

    Any ideas/experience? It is a MPLS VPN connection and we hear

    using DMVPN with IPSEC for encryption of the EC - ec. That's a financial House and headquarters

    Circuit must be gigabit.

    Thank you all

    Stephen

    Stephen,

    I'm not sure of current sheets, perhaps better to do a ping of a Cisco self?

    Possible solution cat6k + VPN SPA or ASR1k (not sure that sheets are saying about this last tho)

    Marcin

    Edit: ASA will not manage DMVPN so I did not mention 5580.

    Find the link, I had in mind

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6635/ps7180/prod_brochure09186a00801f0a72.html

    With regard to the experience...

    If you don't want one not far from the step configuration guide, VPNSPA is very correct.

    ASR1k has a good potential, but it's still new, a great team so internally.

  • Cisco ASA5505 Gigabit?

    Hi all

    Checked the POST on an ASA5505 (9.1 (3)) one it shows 2 Gigabit NIC:

    Total network cards found: 10

    88E6095 rev 2 Gigabit Ethernet @ index 09 MAC: 0000.0003.0002

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 08 MAC: 885a.92d9.f938

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 07 MAC: 885a.92d9.f937

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 06 MAC: 885a.92d9.f936

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 05 MAC: 885a.92d9.f935

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 04 MAC: 885a.92d9.f934

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 03 MAC: 885a.92d9.f933

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 02 MAC: 885a.92d9.f932

    88E6095 rev 2 Ethernet @ index 01 MAC: 885a.92d9.f931

    y88acs06 Gigabit Ethernet rev16 @ index MAC 00: 885a.92d9.f939

    Is there a Gigabit licenses on the roadmap?

    Kind regards

    Norbert

    Hello

    I doubt that it has nothing to do with subsequent changes, as the device is specced for only 150Mbps throughput.

    I saw Cisco release any model replacement, even if I asked a few times.

    I think that 2 GigabitEthernet interfaces refer to the internal-Data0 and Data1 internal interfaces

    It is the output of my own ASA

    The internal-Data0/0 interface ' ' is in place, line protocol is up

    The material is y88acs06, BW 1000 Mbit/s, 10 DLY usec

    (Full-duplex), (1000 Mbps)

    Internal-Data0/1 interface ' ' is in place, line protocol is up

    The material is 88E6095, BW 1000 Mbit/s, 10 DLY usec

    (Full-duplex), (1000 Mbps)

    Also, here is a picture of a Cisco Live! presentation on the architecture of the ASA5505 model (click to enlarge)

    Hope this helps

    -Jouni

  • WAP4410N defined as repeaters and not connected to the Gigabit switch

    Nice day.  The scenario is like this.  From the modem/router broadband connected to a switch port Gigabit 8.  Then a WAP4410N is connected to the switch, cable connection over a distance of 90 metres.  WAP4410N is defined as a point of access to the area.  Then the second WAP4410N will run as the first WAP4410N Repeater.  My question is, can we put the second WAP4410N as Repeater, without the need to be connected to the switch via an ethernet cable.

    Thank you.

    Hello Rey square,

    The short answer is Yes.

    modem

    |

    |

    | spend - AP1 - AP2---> wireless client

    Please keep several factors of consideration. When you repeat a signal, you will lose almost 50% throughput for each pattern with a maximum of 3 repeat. As an example, if you have a 10mbit AP1 connection, you should expect around 5 Mbit connection when using the AP2. Also, keep in mind, 90 meters is 293 feet. Although the AP can cover about 5,000 square feet in absolutely perfect conditions, without obstruction, this 90 meters is a very large distance to the AP you will probably run to a degradation of the signal serious, and possibly unable to join AP1 AP2.

  • network throughput

    Does this sound like a problem with ESXi and, if so, any ideas on how to fix it?

    It seems that I'm the slow file transfer rate to my VMs ESXi - 13 MB/s on average.  I'm trying to figure out how to get the best transfer rates.

    My configuration:

    File server with Ubuntu, 6 GB ram, 2.4 ghz double heart, an Areca Raid Controller (1230 w/1 GB of cache) and 8 Seagate 2 TB drives configured as a single Raid 5 volume and two ports bonded ethernet (802.3ab).

    The Dell PowerConnect 2724 switch - gigabit 24 ports with 802.3ab support.

    ESXi server with an i7 920, 12 GB of ddr3 (1600) and 3 Western Digital drives black 1 TB (10 k RPM), Intel Pro/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter.

    My tests:

    Base - how quickly a 700 MB file will transfer to the source file to the destination server.  I know... IOmeter, etc. is best for measuring performance, but please bear with me, since I have not installed IOmeter and I don't know how to use it yet.

    Test 1 - destination is a desktop computer connected to the switch Gigabit, duplex full.  Transfers of files in 10 seconds.  The Office has a network utility that reports an average 65 MB/s transfer rate

    Test 2 - destination is a virtual computer running on the desktop (VMware Fusion).  Transfers of files in 15 seconds.

    test 3 - destination is a virtual computer running on the ESXi server.  Transfers of files in 55 seconds.

    Test 4 - copy (and not move) the file from one folder to another within the VM ESXi.  File copy in 10 seconds.

    Additional notes:

    -ESXi a vmnet0, the two ethernet ports are added, joining a hash based on intellectual property

    -On the file server CPU usage never exceeds 10% on any of the tests

    -J' ran all the tests with Windows 98 and Linux (Ubuntu) virtual machines

    -All the virtual machines have installed the VMware client

    Conclusions:

    It seems that ESXi is misconfigured somehow, because a file 13 MB/s transfer rate seems slow because the file server can feed the same file different destination 5 times faster.  I try to get ESXi use 802.3ab collage for a higher rate, but it seems that I should get more than 13 MB/s even with a port single gigabit.

    What can I achieve the network greater throughput / faster?  That is to say. Make the file copy faster transfer of the file server to one of the ESXi virtual machines?  I have to configure something differently?  I have to install quad gigabit or 10g?  I have to go with iSCSI?  Or is there a configuration item that just needs to be tweaked for better performance?

    Far switches will also, I like the Dell. I think they offer really good features for their prices relatively low. My choice would be to stick to those.

    Thanks and take care.

    LB.

  • Airport Extreme dislike gigabit speed

    I'm having a strange problem. Backstory... I have an older Ooma VoIP device. It works very well.  The connection is Modem > Ooma > router - my modem (ARRIS Surfboard SB6141) and I use Airport Extreme. When the devices are connected as indicated everything works fine. The modem has a 'connection' light which is orange with this configuration. According to the manual of the modem, this light indicates Ethernet (10Base-T) or Fast Ethernet (100Base-T) is running.  When I remove the Ooma system and connect the modem directly to the router, the yellow led lights up blue saying that the signal that the modem sends is now a high-speed Gigabit Ethernet (1000Base-T).  Sounds great, but my router then ceases to broadcast and distribute a signal, directly and without wire connected with a cat6 cable.

    You could say, then leave him alone and I can do, but I'm willing to reconfigure my system with updated Ooma device, and causes my modem from orange to blue, thus losing my Wi - Fi.  I talked to Arris (modem does not work as expected), I talked to Ooma (if the signal is working on their device, they see not the problem). So that the leaves of the router.  Can anyone figure out what's going on? Why did I lose my signal when I go directly from the modem to the router when the speed seems to be better?  (Yes, I restart both modem and router in the right order).

    Any help would be appreciated.

    Thank you

    David

    It seems that your Ooma device only supports (up to) 100 Mbps Ethernet connections. On the other hand, does your AirPort Extreme support 1 Gbps Ethernet.

    The reason why you can be make connectivity issues when connecting your Arris modem to an extreme that is there has been many positions related to this. Specifically and the problem of incompatibility between the SB61XX series modems and airport base stations. This is not bad in themselves, they just don't "play well" together. Typical complaints is poor, transfer rate, and inconsistent Internet connectivity.

    Basically, you have two choices:

    1. Replace the Arris modem with another modem series of non-SB61XX. If you plan to go this route, you must select a modem recommended by your ISP.
    2. Replace your extreme with a non-Apple router.
  • Cannot configure embedded card Gigabit Ethernet...

    Hello

    I am using Bootcamp 2.x with 10.6.x on a 2011 end pro macbook.

    Is Windows XP SP3

    I want (I need) using the integrated Ethernet Gigabit 10/100/1000 BASE-T, but cannot configure it!

    My Broadcom 802.11n wireless card is in place and works fine

    Documentation of the specifications Apple says:

    • Gigabit built-in 10/100/1000BASE-T Ethernet (RJ-45 connector)

    When I ran PC-Wizard, he told me:

    Network card: BCM57765 of Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet PCIe

    If I go to computer management program and open the list of Device Manager

    Card Ethernet is not visible in the list of network... and control has a ethernet cards? icon...

    How to proceed with the installation?

    Any advice?

    Thanks in advance

    You have the DVD with drivers?

    See also install Windows 7 and previous versions on your Mac with Boot Camp - Apple Support .

  • Using a disc of love at first sight with thunderbolt-gigabit adapter

    Hello.

    I have a bit of a strange situation.

    I bought an IMAC 27 the retina used 5 k with a SSD of 256. end of 2015 model - still under warranty.   Frame background... before I made the purchase, I called in the SN and the Apple representative said that she had a 1 TB fusion drive.  It turns out it's a SSD of 256 custom. Great machine, nice and fast, but the disk is too small to hold all the photos we have on site. I called apple and they said, it is easy to put the photos on a disc of love at first sight and it wouldn't make much a difference of access time for the photos as thunderbolt comms is actually faster than the speed of the drive SATA external drive.

    Now for what is strange.

    I don't want a hard drive off my IMAC clean looking nice.    I have however ethernet cable in the wall.

    Does anyone know if I can use a gigabit for thunder bolt on side installation mac converter, use the ethernet cable wall I allows me to drive to the top of my structured cabling Panel, then connect the drive to love at first sight with another converter gigabit/crush?

    To them and to specify that the installation again:

    -IMAC

    -crush / converter gigabit

    -about 100 feet of ethernet cable

    -crush / converter gigabit

    -By car thunderbolt

    or am I crazy?

    upgrade the drive on the IMAC without voiding the warranty is WAYYY expensive.

    See you soon

    Mac

    You do a lot of complex, just get an of:

    https://www.twelvesouth.com/product/backpack-for-iMac

    hook upward drive external hard and you're done.

  • Satellite C660: fast ethernet or gigabit ethernet?

    Hi all

    No matter what owners here Satellite C660 series?
    Looking at various Web sites, the common consensus is that the C660 series is not equipped with gigabit ethernet, but with regular fast ethernet.

    Can anyone confirm or deny that please?
    Does or does not gigabit ethernet?

    Thank you very much
    Kind regards
    Rene Fennet

    What Satellite C660 do you have exactly?

  • Satellite Pro A100 - how to configure to gigabit?

    I have an A100 A100/Pro with an Intel PRO/1000PL network card which is supposed to be capable of Gigabit connection. It will only connect to 100 Mbps.
    Change the setting of speed car 1000 disconnects the device.

    How to set up this card to 1000Mbps.

    Hello

    Connection speed Gigabit also depends on your router you have and your network cable. But don t expect a strange performance gain, if you want to copy data from your HARD disk is not fast enough transfer 1 Gbps and no Internet connection are known to me they need to that speed.

    Anyway, your router supports gigabit? If this isn't the case, you can use t gigabit!

  • envy h8 1559: there is no such thing as RTL8171EH-CG Gigabit Ethernet Controller.

    Hi Hp.

    My Network RTL8171EH-CG controller do not exist in the system. I use all the command lines that I know not, but nothing.

    what I get from ip link: lo: LOOPBACK, upward, LOWER_UP > mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue State UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT default group
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00.   Is - fixable?   Tkanks

    Hi,: RTL8171EH-CG Gigabit Ethernet Controller was destroyed because I removed the video card and ram to upgrade to them.

    I bought an ethernet card external usb 3.0 and it's all good now.   Good bye.

  • 4-port gigabit ram vista fix

    I stumbled across the ms Update site, but I am unable to find (fix 4-port gigabit ram for Vista) I would like to improve my laptop 1 GB to 4 GB. Can someone give me an idea where to find and fix Ms.

    There is no 'RAM solution' for Windows Vista.  If you have a 32-bit version of Windows Vista, then you can install Service Pack 1 and it will allow you to 'see' the 4 GB of RAM on the property page, but it does not fully use it.

  • Qosmio X 500-how use Gigabit LAN?

    My gigabit sometimes connection connects to 100Mbit. How to switch up to gigabit or configure it cannects to gigabit?

    My DHCP server is a router 100Mbit, but I connect the Qosmio and 2 other computers and NAS to a GB switch. I did the NAS to connect to Go when he origin connected to 100 Mbps switch ip static and return to DHCP and configure Jumbo mtu. (9 k). office and other laptops have not had a problem with it so far, but I want to be better informed in case the problem is.

    Where can I get more info on all the configuration settings in the property for the gigabit adapter box? I'm sure the amswer is out there somewhere but don't want to turn it off by random changes to the properties.

    Hello

    If you want to use Gigabit LAN, you must first a cable that supports the high speed connection to the local network. As far as I know, it must have at least CAT5e specifications.
    Did you check that?

    Additionally, make sure that this latest LAN driver is installed at Toshiba. Check the driver download page.

    Last but not least, in the properties of the network card in Device Manager, you can choose with speed mode should be used. Here, you must select Gigabit.

  • No speed Gigabit LAN on Satellite A300-1EI in Win XP

    Hi all

    I have a toshiba A300-1EI and downgraded from windows vista to windows xp.
    When I installed the LAN driver, I discovered that the supplied driver connection speed is 10/100 only (I downloaded the official driver of the [here | http://gulf.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/download_driver_details.jsp?service=AE&selCategory = 2 & selFamily = 2 & selSeries = 153 & selProduct = 781 & selSho rtMod = 694 & language = 13 & selOS = 10 & selType = all & yearupl = DST & monthupload = & dayupload = & useDate = null & mode = all Machines & search = & action = search & macId = & country = 39 & electedLanguage s = 13 & type = all & page = 1 & ID = 62485 & DISO =]) 1 0 & driverLanguage = 42]).

    I would like to link 10/100/1000 speed, and I had no idea how.

    Any other advice/help would be very appreciated.

    Thank you very much
    Ahmed Osama

    Don t be angry with me, but I don t know why you expect a gigabit LAN speed?

    The laptop was equipped with map of Base - TX Ethernet LAN 10/100, and it supports 100 Mbps max.

    If everything looks ok buddy!

  • HP ENVY 15 t-k000 CTO Notebook: HP Envy My network adapter does not support gigabit speeds. Is there an upgrade available?

    My HP Envy 15 t-k000 works very well, but it is slow. I thought it was my internet until I did some troubleshooting and discovered that I don't get the super fast speed that I'm supposed to receive this is because my computer does not have a fast enough network adapter. He's currently the Qualcomm Atheros AR9485 it came with. I watched the maintenance manual and could not find an upgrade. Is there a module I can replace with allowing for speeds 1 G?

    The part number for the laptop is G0T55AV.

    Thank you!

    Hello:

    The adapter you mentioned... Qualcomm Atheros AR9485 is the wireless network card, and I do not think that this card connects everything faster than 72 Mbps.

    Your laptop comes with the card Realtek 10/100 ethernet (wired) and it cannot be upgraded because the ethernet chip is part of the motheboard.

    If you want a gigabit ethernet connection, so I advise you to buy an external USB to RJ-45 gigabit ethernet adapter.

    You won't find any wireless card that will go beyond the rate of 867 Mbps AC, and you would need a router ca to achieve these speeds.

    You would also dismantle the entire notebook to replace the wireless card and if your laptop has a single antenna attached to the atheros wireless network card, you will not be able to upgrade to the fastest wireless card.

    A proper AC map would be the Intel 7260 wireless card if your mobile phone has two antennas attached to the atheros card.

    http://www.Intel.com/content/www/us/en/wireless-products/dual-band-wireless-AC-7260-Bluetooth.html

Maybe you are looking for

  • import photos from the phone without Photos

    Is it possible to import photos from an iPhone without "PHOTOS" / iphoto? ". I had an iPhoto library really big on the external drive that now will not migrate because I need to 72 GB extra space - which is kind of off me to iPhoto - if I had known i

  • X 1 keyboard settings window Adaptive carbon open habit

    I don't know why this is happening but I tried everything - installed driver for power management, the center of solutions, but since I got this laptop, the settings for apaptive keyboard never window opens. Ive tried via the control panel and also i

  • How to transfer files from one account to another

    How to transfer files as music from one account to another? my old account has a virus and it got currupted and I want to know how to put my old files in my new account.

  • Win7 Acitivation

    I can't activate my WIN7 product key. I think that the problem may be that I sent my laptop for repair a few days ago and they changed my logic board. How can I solve this problem?

  • How to change the resolution of the image without shrinking the image in Photoshop?

    Hello world. In Photoshop, if you change the resolution to 300 to 72 image it automatically changes the size of the image (narrowing it) but if export you for the web, he transforms it in 72 DPI without changing the size of the image! How can we just