Group of circuits with MGCP

Similar Questions

• Is it possible to configure NFAS with MGCP or require a H323 gateway?

  I'll put a bridge linking taken 5 put in place on the side of telco as NFAS.

  I was wondering if there is any way to group these ECN with MGCP or if I do a H323 gateway.

  No, ECN is not supported with MGCP. SIP or H323 is what you should use. Assuming a little recent CUCM and IOS SIP would be preferable.

• Questions of circuits with switches HP BC at base of Cisco

  I saw a few topics on this already posted, some days ago, but I am unable to get my systems to operate in the way that I prefer.  Let me start by saying that I'm not a genius of the network, but I am very familiar with VMware itself.  In my past lives, I asked just a trunk, EtherChannel X # of VLAN and I scored on the vSwitch.  However, because of the cost of equipment Cisco, a new BladeCenter HP c3000 was purchased with GbE2c layer 2/3 Ethernet Blade switches and a group of us here can't understand how best to configure.  I hope that someone here has experience in this area.

  Existing configuration

  Cisco 6509 < = dual Ethernet 1 Gbps w / LACP (active) = > HP GbE2c Blade Switch < = several Configs VLAN = > Blade (i.e. Bay 5)

  Problem

  Whenever a new VLAN is added to the trunk, it must touch every single HP switch to manually add any VLANS.  Takes forever to get the new VLAN.  Also, it is expected that we get the cumulative flow that I don't think that works without groups of circuits from HP (according to my reading).  I could be wrong however.

  Desire

  Configure the HP switch so that it passes all the trunk contents up to the ESXi host and configures port groups only / VLAN tags to the dvSwitch.  Thus whenever definition trunk changes, everything that is needed in ESX is to create the new dvPortGroup.  In addition, they expect aggregation of bandwidth between the uplinks in the dvSwitch.

  Is it possible to reach this configuration?  Hosts run ESXi 4.1.

  P.S. I'm keep simple right now, ultimately I have can I extend that to 10 G ethernet and four or more rising by dvSwitch.

  Hello.

  We also have HP c3000/c7000 with HP GbE2c switches connected to Cisco switches.

  Each new VLAN, I create on Cisco, I have to create this VLAN on HP switches.

  I doubt that it is possible to not do it only once. To do this, HP switches must be member of the Cisco VTP domain, but as I know that HP does not support exclusive Cisco VTP. HP supports a similar protocol called GARP.

  Kind regards

  Ante

• I want to move a large number of photos but don't want to unique, click each photo. I know there is a simple control function that allows to select groups of files with ' two'clicks ', as opposed to the selection of each file. Suggestions?

  I want to spend a lot of photos (they are in order) but and do not want to have to click to move each photo. I know there is a simple control function that allows to select groups of files with ' two'clicks ', as opposed to the selection of each file. Suggestions? I know it's apple 101, but I don't remember what order to press the button command, or shift, or other. Thank you

  Select the first file, then hold down the SHIFT key, and then click the last file. Or, select any file in the folder and then press command + A

• HELP: What router supports VLAN? -I wish both groups cannot communicate with each other.

  Hi all

  I have 5 wireless devices must connect to the router.

  I want to divide it into 2 groups:

  That is to say, 1, device A, B, C, group 2, device D, E.

  I would like two groups cannot communicate with each other.

  I've heard, it can be done by VLAN, is e2500 can adapt to what I need?

  What about EA3500 and EA4500?

  I use G wireless, is what it means that ea4500 is out of choice even if it supports VLAN?

  Thank you all!

  Evil

  Thanks for the clarification for the OP

  FWIW

  is this an alternative to routers that do not support of VLAN, to do what you want

  http://www.SmallNetBuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-HOWTO/32486-how-to-segment-a-small-LAN-using-tagged-VLA...

• How to create user defined groups and users with custom permissions as only open and export in obiee 11 g?

  Hello

  I want to give as open & export to the level of permissions.

  How to create user defined groups and users with custom permissions as only open and export in obiee 11 g?

  For example, if the group permissions, inturn should reflect on the users.

  Please help me.

  Thanks in advance,

  A.Kavya.

  Your question is quite broad and fuzzy then I suggest the security catalog presentation to read documentation: http://docs.oracle.com/middleware/1221/biee/BIESC/mgrgrpsusers.htm#CIHIBJGD

  And I think that you mix you two things which are managed in different places:

  ) an object as read access permissions, write, delete... which control you through the object "Permissions" dialog box

  

  

  (b) functional privileges controlled through "Manage privileges" under "Administration".

  

• VRA unable to create groups of companies with the same name in different tenants with vRO

  vRA 6.2.2 Build - 2754020

  vRO 6.0.1

  Through the vRA GUI I can create groups of companies with the same names in different tenants as follows:

  Tenant1: BusGroup1, BusGroup2, BusGroup3

  Tenant2: BusGroup1, BusGroup2, BusGroup3

  
  

  However, to create business groups with the same names in different tenants via the vRO, specifically the workflow plugin Library / vCloud Automation Center / Administration / Business groups / create a group of companies, fails in the second tenant with the below error:
  

  
  

  [42106] the specified condition is not respected for 'name '. (Name of the dynamic Script Module: createBusinessGroup #12)

  If I change the naming convention to be different by tenant, then I have no problem. I thought it might be a restriction in the product, but as said I was able to create with the names of same origin through the user interface.

  Anyone experience the same thing?

  This is a known problem within IaaS API the plugin vRO uses to manage groups of companies through business groups workflows. You don't have the same problem of the vRA UI because the user interface (according to the 6.x) does not use the same API IaaS to manage groups of companies.

  The only alternative to 6.x for now is to directly use the helper generic entity Manager plug-in itself. You can take a look at the first example in example CRUD Infrastructure tasks management Scripts.

  I hope it helps.

  Sergio

• Two groups of ports with same VLAN on the same Vswitch?

  I'm doing a consolidation.  We had two different people put up two closed different of Vsphere and different network labels were used.   Of course the network labels must exactly match vmotion without losing connectivity.    So I was hoping that I could just create groups in double port on my vswitch for VLAN do not match them.  I know I could just migrate them and move quickly from the network label, but some of them are essential and may not fall.

  For example, on a cluster, I might have a port for Vlan ID 88 group that says 'Web DMZ'.  But the other cluster has "WWW" VLan ID 88.    Can I just create a second group of ports on the first group which also used Vlan ID 88 with the name 'WWW' and I started?    Which will cause problems with switching (loops, etc.)?

  Hope it makes sense.  Guess the short answer is can I I have two groups of different ports on a vswitch using the same VLAN ID tag without causing problems?

  Creation of several groups of ports with the same VLAN ID should not cause any problem. This is only marking/close the traffic to and from the virtual machine, is nothing like that of loops,... to be afraid of.

  André

• R12: Copy a group of companies with configurations, metadata and data in the same instance of OA

  The idea was born to a very common condition between the companies IT. pre-sales and pro-ventes groups do various tasks, including the response of the RPF/RFI, PoC, building, Solution architecture, customer demo etc. Ususally they do not have the dedicated application instances, or rather they do not find a sufficient number of cases of applications dedicated to deep study of the road. Every other day a group cries out for an Apps instance and the same gets lift for senior management in short time. It gives a lot of pain to the infrastructure/DBA groups because they fail to meet people like them, due to the limited availability of free nodes, resources, networks and space etc.
  
  I have a Vision of the R12.1.3 (tell SID = VIS1213) installed on a Linux machine. The box is quite busy with his hearts limited, showing little free memory and the attached SAN has insufficient free space remaining. A group of Oracle Apps pre-sales consultants, says "Group 1", is the use of this.»
  
  Now the 3 other groups are asking for a R12.1.3 Vision instance separately for different reasons below. Each of them wants the instance again and do not share with others.
  
  Group 2 for deep study of the road against a critical response to RFP
  Group-3 for the development of a point of contact for a customer demo
  Group 4 for the manufacture of PUK media on some business processes
  
  In this scenario, I should install 3 distinct Vision of R12.1.3 (using CDs or downloaded zip) or clone VIS1213 in 3 different places with different SIDS, possibly on one or more separated nodes (as above Linux node has insufficient free resources). In this case, the need for available server resources and disk space multiplied by 3, so that DBA maintenance for these 3 new instances is added.
  
  Hope that I have clear air up to this point.
  
  Then I was thinking if we have "virtual instances" within an existing instance of Apps, by copying from a vertain org level. First I thought I'd take THE level, but it will not work if an instance of group to work with HRMS claims. We must therefore take business group level. After that we will create the appropriate role and responsibility, user profile options so that the new user can see and work on the new BG and data area down only. It will be like a separate instance to use.
  Benefits of my desired task will be
  
  -no separate server resource, the required network
  -no additional DBA not involved maintenance
  -no separate required backup plan
  
  So here it is to create 3 new "virtual instances" right within the same instance of VIS1213. New groups will have same URL, same existing TNS details but 3 credentials different existing access. Each of them would be limited in a way so that they can not see each and other data and can not hurt each and other changes.
  
  This can be achieved if we can copy an existing group of its activities with org structures, metadata and data, within the same instance. Oralce planning cannot be copied within the same instance configurations.
  
  What I've done so far was I manually created a new BG, attached an existing sobbing (CoA, Agenda / currency), created a new, copied and modified accounting structure flexfields before fixing, created the new ORGANIZATIONAL unit, and then a new InvOrg of master and a new InvOrg clild, defined the profile MO some GL and HR profiles. Then I extracted finished master and data assignment article category Masters against a master/child existing InvOrg, updated the data for newly created InvOrgs, inserted into tables insterface and ran seeded import conc program element. Except for a few, all data have been loaded into base against new InvOrgs tables.
  
  Then I tried with master provider (with sites and contacts). A few AP configurations are required, and then data provider (+ contact + site) have been loaded against OR newly created (under new BG) base tables.
  
  I do not proceed after that. I'm currently looking for ideas from the experts on how to go further.
  
  Planning is able to create this kind of 'virtual instance' within the same instance of OSTEOARTHRITIS?
  
  PL nowadays return.
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Castelbajac Dhara
  E-mail: [email protected]

  PL don't post duplicate topics - R12: copy a group of companies with org, configurations, metadata & data structures

• Why the books are grouped and preinstalled with the operating system?

  It's complaints

  My Portege has Windwosw Vista. I didn't want to buy Vista, but they were only selling with him and no other choice was possible to purchase.

  First of all, my laptop had problems to install Windows updates. I could not connect my institution's Internet System. I had to reinstall the system again.
  It's a waste of time!

  After re-installation of the button for the sound on the outside Panel does not work correctly.

  Also, when I try to stop the laptop sometimes it restarts itself - he doesn't stop!

  Secondly, I had a problem with the laptop, when an opportunity to visit a well-known site, it serves to block itself.
  Once, when he is blocked, I had to restart and its screen remained black. They took for repair. It was delivered later - repaired, but with a defect on the screen!
  What a... workers!

  When I bought this laptop he had an offer with the update of Vista with Windows 7 after their release.
  Wonderful. But just note, Toshiba has the highest price of the offer, compared to its competitors - 30 (or £) against 15 for others, which of course I'm not going to pay.

  I already paid for Vista, which is incredible, and I knew, but I had not choice not to buy!

  All right, so there is still competition in the market, several possibilities are present - install Windows cracked, switch to Linux or just buy an Apple!

  Please, take this comment seriously! And please, stop with group buying, no matter what the benefit is. It won't work for long.

  Hi mate

  Fact is that most of the laptop manufacturers sell the computer and laptop computer with a preinstalled operating system. So I wouldn't blame Toshiba or other brands for which

  You get a new computer/laptop with a new OS.
  During the past 20 years, Microsoft released 3.0 Win, Win 95, Win 98, Win NT, W2k, Win XP, Win ME, Vista and Win 7, I remember that all my computers or laptops were grouped with these operating systems

  Toshiba offers the notebook with a clean image and you can also create a recovery disk (so don t need to buy anything if you need t n)
  Of course, each of us can install a clean OS, but there are a lot of people who are happy with such image pre-installed because everything is pre-installed and configured.

  Many people have no knowledge of computer wide and are really recognizing that everything is pre-installed and the configuration does not have a lot of time

  With regard to the question of the laptop;
  What to say; you had a bad luck that something was wrong with the laptop. This can still happen that my new LCD TV other manufacturer, was dead after two weeks, I called ASP, then replaced the screen now is ok

• Is it possible to get the value of the resistance of a circuit with NI USB-4065 USB without using studio measure?

  Hi, I'm working on a project where there partly to measure resistance values in different parts of the circuit. Now, the company where I work currently at wants to get the NI USB-4065 USB. I use visual studio 2005 c# to develop applications and I need to know if I needed measurement studio or are there drivers (dll) just to get the values of resistance and General measures of circuit. I have need the controls or anything, just to programatically read the NI USB-4065 USB key values when I need the application.

  Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  Yes, you can have several NI 4065 DMM in your system. When you use the API OR-DMM, you open the handles separately for each DMM by using its name. His name can be configured inside the measurement and Automation Explorer (MAX).

  In addition, you can go ahead and install OR DMM today. It is downloadable for free on ni.com. NOR-DMM (and most of the pilots NOR) supports the simulation. You go to MAX and create your simulated three 4065 s. Then you can start writing your program now. Since these devices are simulated, they will not return the real tensions (obviously) and that it won't react realistic hardware triggers if you use (obviously), but they are pretty close to the real deal to allow you to write a lot of code and become familiar with the API. No need to wait until you get the material - you can be really ready for it by using the simulation.

• Residential group cannot access with Tesco security... Help

  Another person had and solved the same problem?  My home group has worked well with Norton 360 and then I got tesco broadband, and part of the package is the security system.  Now I can't use at all Homegroup.  Help, please.

  Hi Angie,.

  1. what operating system is installed on the computer?

  2. have you temporarily disable Norton 360 and check?

  3. have you temporarily disable the security for Tesco and check?

  If you have installed Windows 7, then refer to these items and check if that helps.

  Home Sweet homegroup: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-in/windows7/help/home-sweet-homegroup-networking-the-easy-way

  Homegroup: frequently asked questions: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-in/windows7/homegroup-frequently-asked-questions

  Thank you.

• Creation of a virtual circuit with LabVIEW

  Hello

  I am a student in first year engineering on a vacation of the summer research program. Literally just started using LabVIEW.

  My request - I can create a virtual circuit and then use LabVIEW for control switches/relay/circuit breakers in the circuit. My University has a microarray and my own research during the holiday season is to make an interface for this grid. The main objective is to control switches etc. using LabVIEW. And so to be a freshman with many prejudices against me (haha) it would be nice to use something virtual rather than something I could break.

  See you soon

  Then, we must understand what you want to do.

  If you want to simulate the whole shebang, you can do it.

  You can simulate buses, with expenses and supplies switches and vulnerabilities.  It's just math operations.

  After 37 seconds, the transformer to the 6-G node fails and draws excessive current, the circuit breaker for bus 6 breaks the circuit OK?

  I don't see what good that would do, but you could do it.

  If you really want to control the physical microarray, then you must have the interface hardware.

  Perhaps you need a digital I/o card, where iron 0 runs on the #6 bit 1 bus power depends on the load, and iron #2 turn on the load of over-current and you have the feeling that the CB tripped looking bit 8, and so on.

  Maybe you need an analog output, where you the value of the 130 V supply voltage and set the frequency to 65 Hz instead of 60.

  Maybe you need an analog input, where you measure the current at the point the circuit breaker is triggered and measure the voltage of the battery and so on.

  There are MIO devices with some of these areas, there are the specialized devices focusing on high performance in one of these areas.

  LabVIEW can control all.

  It will not be fun.  You can't plug the Council, launch LabVIEW and have it do what you want. You need to do some programming. It is much easier than using other languages, but it is not trivial.

  Hope that helps.

• Groups of AP with HREAP?

  Hello

  I have an idea in my mind, but I don't know if that's possible!

  I have 2 WLAN - 'private' and 'public '. They work fine on the central site, where the WLC is housed (4402, ver 5.0). I would get the APs with management on the WLC offices using HREAP (auth, centralized, local taffic). I want to use the existing WLAN/SSID but their mapping into their own VLANs.

  I think the way to do would be to configure the AP groups, and then add the mappings of interface for the WLAN SSID to management? I know AP groups work to local APs where there is a real interface defined, but I don't know how it works with HREAP.

  I looked at the HREAP groups, but appears not to have the functionality I'm after.

  Any help much appreciated.

  Thank you

  J

  J,

  You can circumnavigate WLC GUI management, by accessing the AP, and then click on the HREAP tab, enable management of the check mark, then click vlan mapings and change the mappings of vlan for each SSID.

  No need for the Ap or HREAP groups.

  Hope this helps,

  Leo

• Creating groups of mobility with 4402

  I am looking to place three 4402 controllers of production in the same mobility group.  Currently, there is no mobility group.  My question is, will this affect somehow customers when I add the controllers to the same group?  I'm sure not, but I wanted to just make sure.

  Yes, you're right, it will not adversely affect the customer.

  #Mobility Group is useful for roaming, anchor and AP aid smoothly. WLC restart is not required to add/configure mobility.

  #If you have similar wlan configured on all these customers and 3 WLCs tried to roaming, it probably makes roaming with delays dhcp failover. Given that it is already harming those clients, feel free to set up mobility.

  #If APs on these 4402 s sharing RF so don't forget to set up similar groups of RF to avoid each idetifying APs themselves as thieves.