Help with unit 4.2 w / Exchange 2003

Similar Questions

• 4.1 unit. (1) and Exchange 2003 SP2

  Is the unit 4.1. (1) and Exchange 2003 SP2 is supported, I'm planning on the upgrade of the existing unit 4.0.5 to 4.1. (1) at - it no cisco Documentation on this subject?

  Mrugresh,

  SP2 is listed on the recommended cisco page updated, at the following location.

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/voice/c_unity/cmptblty/msupdate.htm

  * Please note the useful answers

• Help, please! problem with enhanced vmxnet adapter and Exchange 2003 VM

  Hello

  I recently changed internal NIC our Exchange Server 2003 computer flexible to vmxnet virtual improved, with recommendation of Scott Lowe to modify the *.vmx after taking the inventory server.

  I put the server in the inventory and restarted... then went in through the window / VIC and set a static IP address on Local 2 the new map of the NETWORK, as it was called.

  "I get this message from server: IP address, you have entered for this network adapter is already assigned to another adapter ' VMware Accelerated PCNet Adapter," then it goes on to say that it is hidden from network connections because it is not physically in the computer, there may be network problems and I would like to assign a different IP address... etc.

  Image is attached.

  I tried to do a repair of the VMware Tools, and he did install the vmxnet driver.

  What should I do to banish the network confiict etc. - it is causing people to not be able to use Outlook and disable RDP etc.

  Or how can I get rid of the AMD NIC reference? I don't see it in either Device Manager...

  Thank you!!

  PS Web access for Exchange behaves funny too - messages are sometimes sometimes they aren't - and a few times: "HTTP/1.1 503 Service unavailable" messages

  All this has happened after changing the NETWORK type card - there's no indication anywhere where something like this could happen.

  VMX list section of ethernet, perhaps the error is in the vmx file?

  ethernet0. Present = 'true '.

  ethernet0.virtualDev = "vmxnet.

  ethernet0. Features = "15".

  ethernet0.wakeOnPcktRcv = "false".

  ethernet0.networkName = 'network of the VM.

  ethernet0. AddressType = 'vpx.

  Only the added lines were manually names and functions.

  I really need to get this resolved... maybe I should change back to soft?

  I'd be better off using the method KB VMware to change the NETWORK adapter that requires a change to the description of the OS?

  Message edited by tom12010 to add information

  Try this too...

  1. Select start > run.

  2 type cmd.exe, and then press.

  3. at the command prompt, run this command:

  Set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices = 1

  4. Enter Start DEVMGMT. MSC and press ENTER.

  5. Select discover > show hidden devices.

  6. expand network adapters (select the plus sign next to the entrance of network adapters)

  7. right click on the adapter and then dimmed network choose uninstall.

  8. close the Device Manager.

• Migration of interns of exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud Exchange

  Hello

  I need help migrate my internal data from Exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud. It's my first time

  the display, if more information is needed please let me know. I bought Office 365 with Exchange for my client.

  Server - SBS2003

  Customers - Office 2007 and 2010

  Thank you

  Ty

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

  And here:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

  See you soon.

• Exchange 2003 Server kept receiving unknown Email sending out through SMTP and the paper jam in the queue folder

  Hello Sir,

  I have a problem with one of my SBS Exchange 2003 servers.

  At first, I was getting a lot of 3008 errors for a non-delivery report with a status code of 5.0.0 was generated for recipient rfc822; address email is removed from the privacy * all these repeated error messages from the event log, SMTP and Exchange Routing service...

  I looked around and discovered more than 10000 .eml in my x:\program files\exchsrv\mailroot\queue folder.  At first, I thought that my server or one of my workstations was compromised, but all workstations have local antiviral software (symantec endpoint protection), my server software also has antiviral and I have a mail server antivirus (symantec endpoint protection).  I scanned all of the computers on the network and even tried almost all of them closing to see if new entries have been created in the queue.

  Unfortunately, more than entries kept by appearing so I kept looking.  By opening one of the .eml, I discovered my own responsibility that I attach to outgoing emails if I have my server acted as a mail relay.  I checked for this and I have been clean.  I kept searching in the .eml and discovered different origins IPs of the Internet.  Am I right to assume that my mail server is BOMBED or attacked with emails with false return addresses and my mail server sends return NDR for spammers/compromised machines on the net?  I tried to stop the exchange services and tried to rename the vsi file 1 to something else as one of the suggested MSKB, but the file was protected.  How can I stop this, it's slowing down my mail server and fill out my HD.  I can't block the IP to shippers because it comes from everywhere.  Help!  There are about 2 to 5 new .eml created every minute!

  TKS and best regards,

  LT

  Hi Lennet,

  Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the forum TechNet for assistance:

  Microsoft Exchange Server

  Hope the helps of information.

• Exchange 2003 FrontEnd Server Down, Bank of messages of the unit down.

  Hello

  The configuration of the Exchange 2003 environment with 1 Server frontend and backend (cluster) 2 servers. The Exchange FrontEnd server is down due to the problem of relay service. All outlook and exchange related services clients are point directly to the server main exchange. This cause of unity is unable to store voice messages in the exchange store. When subscribers call for unity, system will tell the Bank to the user messages are temporary offline. How re - configure the unit to make it appear the message store? Below is the version of the unit.

  Cisco Unity Version 4.0

  Build number 4.0 (3) SR 1

  Windows Server Version Microsoft Windows 2000 version 2195 (Service Pack 3)

  Pls advise.

  Thanking in advance for your help.

  The guide of reconfiguration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/voicesw/ps2237/products_upgrade_guides_chapter09186a0080205a7f.html

  Thank you

  Keith

• Exchange 2003 with clusters

  Hello

  I'm new with Exchange 2003 cluster environment in our Organization, we have a network that will make all activity the network down, then after 12 to 14 hours. Network will rise

  Our Exchange is configured in the cluster with call tool Symantec Enterprise vault archiving environment, we also have the ANTI-SPAM called Sonic Wall filter

  I just wanted to know what kind of care I have to take before and after the network outage?

  Your suggestion of all will be of great help for me

  Kind regards

  Patricia

  Hello SwapnilJain27,

  It would be better to post in the forum of Exchange Server.

  You can find the category that fits your question below:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

  Thank you!

• New driver tuner help with DVB - T TV gel to the United Kingdom on Qosmio?

  Hello Qosmio users

  Today I saw on Toshiba download page nine PCI DVB-T/Analog hybrid Tuner. I can't use it in my country because it DTT is not available, but maybe it can help the United Kingdom with Frost TV guys.

  If this will solve your problem please let us know.

  Hey guys

  If someone has some problems with the installation of the new driver of TV tuner, so I recommend you visit this forum to the topic:
  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=15212

  It s very useful :)

• Smartphones with Exchange 2003 and BES blackBerry torch

  Our company moves to Telus of Rogers and I am curious to know if I am able to continue to use the Server BES 4.1 existing and Exchange 2003 with new features of torch (existing devices are curves).

  Does anyone do this?

  Thank you

  Rob

  has responded

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/BlackBerry-Enterprise-solution/adding-torch-to-BES-4-1/TD-p/6...

• Best practices for Exchange 2003 with VMWare ESXi 3.5 and iSCSI SAN

  Hello guys,.

  Here's the Q? We have 1 physical Exchange 2003, the HOST of 4 and 1 iSCSI SAN with LUN 3, 1 for data, 1 for VMWare and 1 for SQL, if we're going to virtualize it, I don't know where to put data Exchage and newspapers. I do not think that that is a good practice to put together the data but I do not have another SAN. So, what can I do?

  Thank you.

  We have 813 mailbox.

  I agree with cainics, start an average size and go from there.  I know it's a production mail server and you can not exactly 'play' with the settings because this requires time, but if you do the VM too big, you would have nothing left for other virtual machines.

  I would go 2 vCPU and at least 4 GB of RAM, maybe 8GB.  There must be parameters for the Exchange mailbox 813 and X users # to implement your environments in order to get an idea of the amount of RAM that will be... 4GB seems minimal to me, but 8 GB would probably be better like that.

• Exchange 2003 Migration to Office365 with SSO

  Hi all

  Merry Christmas to start!

  I work for a company that run Exchange 2003. We plan to do a migration to Office365 and I am researching on the best solution.

  I am aware that there are three main options available, hybrid/intermediary/putting in service.

  My instincts suggest that the best option would be to complete the migration using the staging process, but I think that if I take this route I can't implement single sign on? This is the case...

  If so, is this means to ensure single sign-on can be used, then I can only implement a hybrid solution?

  Hello

  And a Merry Christmas to you, too.

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  Please repost your Question in Exchange for TechNet Forums.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

  See you soon.

• Unity 4.0 (2) and /ForestPrep for Exchange 2003

  We plan to upgrade our Active Directory in Windows Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003 AD network. We currently have two unit 4.0 (2) servers (Unified Messaging) in two separate locations, each serving a different group of offices. All in all, we have more than 1,000 users in 5 different locations. All these users and locations upgrade to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and unity 4.0 (4) at the same time is not an option. Therefore, we would gradually migrate each location to Exchange 2003, Windows 2003 and unity 4.0 (4).

  I understand that unity 4.0 (4) is the recommended version to use with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003, but I've also read in Cisco documentation as 4.0 (4) unit when running on Windows 2003 requires that you are already running Exchange 2003. What confronts a dilemma in that we have separate locations of mutiple supported by one server shared unity and we simply cannot risk all these sites simultaneously to unity 4.0 upgrade (4), Server 2003, and Exchange 2003. So, what would be the best strategy to go where we want to be? This brings me to the following questions:

  a. If we run / Exchange 2003 ForestPrep against our field now even if we are always unity 4.0 (2)?

  b. can we begin to introduce Exchange 2003 servers in each of our branches (administrative groups & routing Exchange) while staying at unity 4.0 (2) provided that these servers are not designated as a partner of unity and without voice mail server or connectors of the unit (for example, unity voice bridge connector) are on these servers?

  c. would make sense to upgrade the servers of the 4.0 unit (3) first and then move to unity 4.0 (4) once all the Exchange servers in all our branches have been improved in Server 2003 and Exchange 2003? This interim update seems to give us more flexibility in our path to upgrade its operating system to Microsoft Exchange server version requirements are less onerous

  Windows 2003 is not necessary for the 4.0 unit (4). Likewise, it is not recommended because there is evidence of the way in which Windows 2000 with the unit, but we do support Windows 2003 if the client really wants to use it. We ship the unit on Windows 2000 and that's what we recommend at this time. No functionality is lost under Windows 2000.

  Officially we do not support have all Exchange 2003 servers or even execution of ForestPrep if you have lower than 4.0 (3). That said, the only flaw we've never seen this is when the unit is connected under the local system or when the subscriber accounts are on Exchange 2003 servers. You wouldn't be the first customer to do so and it should be fine but really understand that it is not technically a Cisco tested and taken in charge of the configuration.

  Thank you

  Keith

• Could not import the user to exchange 2003

  I install MU version 4.0 (4) and when I import the user of the exchange 2003, the alert dialog box informing the message ' unrecognized error 0 x 80041908 occurred, new subscribers was not successfully added. "

  Help me please!

  Unity 4.0 (4) Sr1 has the fix. You can try the following workaround:

  CSCee44191 SA cannot import users when there is a NULL value in fn or ln

  Symptom:

  Import user using the web ITS (System Administrator)

  Console fails with the following error:

  "Unrecognized error 0 x 80041908 has occurred."

  The new customer was not added successfully. »

  Conditions:

  This occurs when any user is null

  value in their fields first name or name.

  Workaround solution:

  Use the CUBI (Cisco Unity bulk import) tool to perform

  import.

• Virtualization of Exchange 2003

  We are about to start (finally) virtualization of our systems.  One of these systems is a Standard Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003, using DAS server and serves about 600 boxes mailbox (if users concurrent max would be around 200 users).  Current physical area includes 3 disks, C, D and E.  C is for system D is application/newspapers and E is for banks to information (only 2 - public and private).

  After reading the various articles and best practices I came with a plan.  Could you get it someone please let me know if it is a good idea?

  In a test environment first of all (with DC operation), separated from the production network:

  Plan of P2V is the current physical Exchange box using VMware Converter Standalone.   Each physical disk would be converted to a virtual disk.  It will implement a SAN to shared storage iSCSI.  Thought create LUNS separate D and E drives, just don't know if this is necessary.  All Exchange and protection antiviruss services will be stopped during the P2V.  I tried to make a cold-clone, but don't know if I can due to the fact that we won't have a VMware enterprise license.

  Once that P2V is complete, power to the top of the new virtual machine.  Remove any vendor (HP Insight) specific applications and drivers.  Then, start the Exchange services and test.

  If successul, process document, repeat the test and before you run on the production system.  Once final, production VM is created, physical stop and turn on VM again.

  If you're ok with the unsupportability of the solution, then I say go ahead and virtualize it.  I still believe that deploying a new server and migrate the mailboxes are the cleanest way to do but to understand the limitations it.  All the more that I would recommend if you could back migration to Exchange 2010 rather than another server in 2003.  There is no direct upgrade from Exchange 2003 to 2013 path so you will need to go to Exchange 2010 in a first time in any case.  Might as well get ready now.

  Migration is easier because then you're not taking all issues with the server of your virtual infrastructure.  It is also pointless to worry about uninstalling the hardware drivers, of unnecessary software, etc.

  I had some success with P2V migration running on Exchange servers.  As I said earlier, you will have the best chance of success if you can organize the downtime to stop all of the Exchange during the P2V services.  That's how I managed in the past.

  Do your homework and understand what works best for you.  I'm sure you can succeed with two approaches.

  Good luck!  Feel free to come back and post how things went or if you need any help.

  Matt

  http://www.thelowercasew.com

• Help with a conversion from an ESX 4.0 host ESXi4.1

  Hi all

  I'm new to VMware. I was given a task to virtualize infrastructure. I bought 3 dell 610's with 64 GB of ram and an equallogic SAN 6000. I have all three new hosts and the SAN in collaboration with a few virtual machines running in it as it is. I have the advanced VMware license. I also have VMCenter installed and working.

  What I need help on is the following:

  I have a computer host running ESX 4.0 with a local storage with exchange 2003 and windows 2008 r2 server x 64 running on it. How can I move the two virtual machines to the SAN, and then upgrade to the host ESX to ESXi 4.1?

  Kind regards

  CG

  Hello

  As Scott says, you simply add the host in vCenter Server and connect the ESX to the San.  Then you can migrate your VMS (virtual machines must be turned off) from the existing to the new host.

  If for some reason you cannot connect the host to the SAN, then you can try with vCenter Converter to do a V2V conversion to migrate your virtual machines.

  Finally, there is no way to upgrade from ESX to ESXi, so you need to do a clean install of ESXi on your existing host.

  Best wishes / Saludos

  -