4.1 unit. (1) and Exchange 2003 SP2

Similar Questions

• Node to Cluster Exchange 2003 sp2 crashed hosted on Server 2003 sp2

  Hello

  A few days back our server one of the cluster node 3 k 2 crashed. The result of the analysis of dump memory is underneath.

  =======================================================================================

  Debug version of Microsoft Windows (R) 6.11.0001.404 X 86

  Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

  Loading dump file [C:\Mini111210-01.dmp]

  The mini kernel dump file: only registers and the trace of the stack are available

  Symbol search path is: srv * c:\symbols* http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols

  Executable search path is:

  Windows Server 2003 Kernel Version 3790 (Service Pack2) MP (4 procs) free x 86 compatible

  Product: Server, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS Enterprise

  By: 3790.srv03_sp2_gdr.100216 - 1301

  Computer name:

  Core = 0 x 80800000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0x808a6ea8

  The debugging session: 16:44:38.863 Fri 12 Nov 2010 (GMT + 5)

  System Uptime: 107 days 6:49:19.098

  Loading the kernel symbols

  ...............................................................

  ...................................................

  Loading user symbols

  Loading unloaded module list

  ......

  *******************************************************************************

  *                                                                             *

  * Bugcheck analysis *.

  *                                                                             *

  *******************************************************************************

  Use! analyze - v to obtain detailed debugging information.

  BugCheck D1, {c, d0000002, 0, b9131168}

  Probably caused by: HTTP.sys (HTTP! UlpReceiveRawData + e1)

  Follow-up: MachineOwner

  ---------

  1: kd >! analyze - v

  *******************************************************************************

  *                                                                             *

  * Bugcheck analysis *.

  *                                                                             *

  *******************************************************************************

  DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (d1)

  An attempt was made to access an address pageable (or completely invalid) to a

  application interrupt level (IRQL) that is too high.  It is usually

  caused by drivers using a wrong address.

  If the kernel debugger is available, get a stack backtrace.

  Arguments:

  Arg1: 0000000c, memory referenced

  Arg2: d0000002, IRQL

  Arg3: 00000000, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation

  Arg4: b9131168, address memory

  Debugging information:

  ------------------

  READ_ADDRESS: 0000000c

  CURRENT_IRQL: 2

  FAULTING_IP:

  Tcpip! CopyRBChain + 1 b 7

  b9131168 3b700c cmp esi, dword ptr [eax + 0Ch]

  CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1

  DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: DRIVER_FAULT_SERVER_MINIDUMP

  BUGCHECK_STR: 0XD1

  Nom_processus: w3wp.exe

  TRAP_FRAME: 8fb7c990-(.trap 0xffffffff8fb7c990)

  ErrCode = 00000000

  EAX = 00000000 ebx = fee38008 ecx = 00003b 01 edx = 00003bf9 esi = 00006e44 edi = 889e87e8

  EIP = b9131168 esp = 8fb7ca04 ebp = 8fb7ca38 iopl = 0 nv in pe of na EI pl nz nc

  CS = 0008 ss = 0010 ds = 0023're = 0023 fs = 0030 gs = 0000 efl = 00010206

  Tcpip! CopyRBChain + 0x1b7:

  b9131168 3b700c cmp esi, dword ptr [eax + 0Ch] ds:0023:0000000 c is?

  Reset the default scope

  LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from b9131168 to 8088c9cb

  STACK_TEXT:

  8fb7c990 b9131168 badb0d00 00003bf9 808 has 6230 nt! KiTrap0E + 0x2a7

  8fb7ca38 b9132311 889e87e8 fee38008 8fb7ca9c tcpip! CopyRBChain + 0x1b7

  8fb7ca94 b9132243 889e87e8 ff3b3008 00000800 tcpip! BufferData + 0x35a

  8fb7cac0 b913121b 8fb7ca00 ff7398dc 00000020 tcpip! TdiReceive + 0 x 291

  8fb7caf8 b913cf6c 8ac89794 ff7398d8 8a7f3110 tcpip! TCPReceiveData + 0x6e

  8fb7cb14 8081df85 8d1ef4d0 ff739868 85cfc588 tcpip! TCPDispatchInternalDeviceControl + 0 x 62

  8fb7cb28 b817ead5 00000000 8a7f3210 00003bf9 nt! IofCallDriver + 0 x 45

  8fb7cb3c b817eb45 ff798b08 feda1034 00003bf9 HTTP. UlpReceiveRawData + 0xe1

  8fb7cb58 b816e66a 8a7f3110 feda1034 00003bf9 HTTP. UlReceiveData + 0x3e

  8fb7cb84 b8199b76 00004000 00000090 HTTP 8a7f3210! UlpConsumeBytesFromConnection + 0xb7

  8fb7cbe4 b8177a55 00000000 00000000 HTTP 88728ae0! UlProcessBufferQueue + 0 x 221

  8fb7cc08 b819c007 8ccd4ed8 88728ae0 00000103 HTTP! UlReceiveEntityBody + 0 x 280

  8fb7cc28 b8163903 fee34838 fee34914 8bb16030 HTTP. UlReceiveEntityBodyIoctl + 0 x 94

  8fb7cc3c 8081df85 8b8e5790 fee34838 89d36b18 HTTP. UlDeviceControl + 0 x 39

  8fb7cc50 808f5511 fee34914 8af570d8 fee34838 nt! IofCallDriver + 0 x 45

  8fb7cc64 808f6299 8b8e5790 fee34838 8af570d8 nt! IopSynchronousServiceTail + 0x10b

  8fb7cd00 808eede2 c 0000018 00000000 00000000 nt! IopXxxControlFile + 0x5e5

  8fb7cd34 808897cc c 0000018 00000000 00000000 nt! NtDeviceIoControlFile + 0x2a

  8fb7cd34 7c82860c c 0000018 00000000 00000000 nt! KiFastCallEntry + 0xfc

  WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Sequence of images may be wrong.

  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x7c82860c 0d36fb5c

  STACK_COMMAND: kb

  FOLLOWUP_IP:

  HTTP! UlpReceiveRawData + e1

  b817ead5 b803010000 mov eax, 103 h

  SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 7

  SYMBOL_NAME: HTTP! UlpReceiveRawData + e1

  FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner

  MODULE_NAME: HTTP

  Nom_image: HTTP.sys

  DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 4bc5fd45

  FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: 0xD1_HTTP! UlpReceiveRawData + e1

  BUCKET_ID: 0xD1_HTTP! UlpReceiveRawData + e1

  Follow-up: MachineOwner

  ---------

  1: kd > lmvm HTTP

  start end module name

  b8162000 b81b3000 HTTP (PDB symbols) c:\symbols\http.pdb\DCEFC2156B1440F69FA2B66C56E8D10D2\http.pdb

  Loaded symbol image file: HTTP.sys

  Mapped memory image file: c:\symbols\HTTP.sys\4BC5FD4551000\HTTP.sys

  Image path: \SystemRoot\System32\Drivers\HTTP.sys

  Image name: HTTP.sys

  Timestamp: Kills Apr 14 23:07:09 2010 (4BC5FD45)

  CheckSum: 00054223

  ImageSize: 00051000

  File version: 5.2.3790.4693

  Product version: 5.2.3790.4693

  Flags of the file: 0 (mask 3F)

  Folder OS: 40004 NT Win32

  File type: pilot 3.7

  File date: 00000000.00000000

  Translations: 0409.04b0

  CompanyName: Microsoft Corporation

  ProductName: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System

  InternalName: http.sys

  OriginalFilename: http.sys

  ProductVersion: 5.2.3790.4693

  FileVersion: 5.2.3790.4693 (srv03_sp2_gdr.100414 - 1800)

  FileDescription: HTTP protocol stack

  LegalCopyright: © Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

  =======================================================================================

  Please suggest what needs to be done to avoid any future occourance.

  Hello ONath,

  Thanks for visiting the site of the community of Microsoft Windows. The question you have posted is related to Exchange Server 2003 and would be better suited in the Exchange Server community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

  Thank you

  Mary
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Help, please! problem with enhanced vmxnet adapter and Exchange 2003 VM

  Hello

  I recently changed internal NIC our Exchange Server 2003 computer flexible to vmxnet virtual improved, with recommendation of Scott Lowe to modify the *.vmx after taking the inventory server.

  I put the server in the inventory and restarted... then went in through the window / VIC and set a static IP address on Local 2 the new map of the NETWORK, as it was called.

  "I get this message from server: IP address, you have entered for this network adapter is already assigned to another adapter ' VMware Accelerated PCNet Adapter," then it goes on to say that it is hidden from network connections because it is not physically in the computer, there may be network problems and I would like to assign a different IP address... etc.

  Image is attached.

  I tried to do a repair of the VMware Tools, and he did install the vmxnet driver.

  What should I do to banish the network confiict etc. - it is causing people to not be able to use Outlook and disable RDP etc.

  Or how can I get rid of the AMD NIC reference? I don't see it in either Device Manager...

  Thank you!!

  PS Web access for Exchange behaves funny too - messages are sometimes sometimes they aren't - and a few times: "HTTP/1.1 503 Service unavailable" messages

  All this has happened after changing the NETWORK type card - there's no indication anywhere where something like this could happen.

  VMX list section of ethernet, perhaps the error is in the vmx file?

  ethernet0. Present = 'true '.

  ethernet0.virtualDev = "vmxnet.

  ethernet0. Features = "15".

  ethernet0.wakeOnPcktRcv = "false".

  ethernet0.networkName = 'network of the VM.

  ethernet0. AddressType = 'vpx.

  Only the added lines were manually names and functions.

  I really need to get this resolved... maybe I should change back to soft?

  I'd be better off using the method KB VMware to change the NETWORK adapter that requires a change to the description of the OS?

  Message edited by tom12010 to add information

  Try this too...

  1. Select start > run.

  2 type cmd.exe, and then press.

  3. at the command prompt, run this command:

  Set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices = 1

  4. Enter Start DEVMGMT. MSC and press ENTER.

  5. Select discover > show hidden devices.

  6. expand network adapters (select the plus sign next to the entrance of network adapters)

  7. right click on the adapter and then dimmed network choose uninstall.

  8. close the Device Manager.

• Unity 4.0 (2) and /ForestPrep for Exchange 2003

  We plan to upgrade our Active Directory in Windows Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003 AD network. We currently have two unit 4.0 (2) servers (Unified Messaging) in two separate locations, each serving a different group of offices. All in all, we have more than 1,000 users in 5 different locations. All these users and locations upgrade to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and unity 4.0 (4) at the same time is not an option. Therefore, we would gradually migrate each location to Exchange 2003, Windows 2003 and unity 4.0 (4).

  I understand that unity 4.0 (4) is the recommended version to use with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003, but I've also read in Cisco documentation as 4.0 (4) unit when running on Windows 2003 requires that you are already running Exchange 2003. What confronts a dilemma in that we have separate locations of mutiple supported by one server shared unity and we simply cannot risk all these sites simultaneously to unity 4.0 upgrade (4), Server 2003, and Exchange 2003. So, what would be the best strategy to go where we want to be? This brings me to the following questions:

  a. If we run / Exchange 2003 ForestPrep against our field now even if we are always unity 4.0 (2)?

  b. can we begin to introduce Exchange 2003 servers in each of our branches (administrative groups & routing Exchange) while staying at unity 4.0 (2) provided that these servers are not designated as a partner of unity and without voice mail server or connectors of the unit (for example, unity voice bridge connector) are on these servers?

  c. would make sense to upgrade the servers of the 4.0 unit (3) first and then move to unity 4.0 (4) once all the Exchange servers in all our branches have been improved in Server 2003 and Exchange 2003? This interim update seems to give us more flexibility in our path to upgrade its operating system to Microsoft Exchange server version requirements are less onerous

  Windows 2003 is not necessary for the 4.0 unit (4). Likewise, it is not recommended because there is evidence of the way in which Windows 2000 with the unit, but we do support Windows 2003 if the client really wants to use it. We ship the unit on Windows 2000 and that's what we recommend at this time. No functionality is lost under Windows 2000.

  Officially we do not support have all Exchange 2003 servers or even execution of ForestPrep if you have lower than 4.0 (3). That said, the only flaw we've never seen this is when the unit is connected under the local system or when the subscriber accounts are on Exchange 2003 servers. You wouldn't be the first customer to do so and it should be fine but really understand that it is not technically a Cisco tested and taken in charge of the configuration.

  Thank you

  Keith

• Help with unit 4.2 w / Exchange 2003

  the documentation states that when you use W/2003 and Exchange 2003 with the 4.2 than Exchange unit must be charged on a separate box. Is it because of the limitations of the processor, or is there a compatibility issue? For a laboratory facility, and will only have about 10 boxes set up if that makes a difference.

  This is due to the limits of performance. Note this limitation will be removed in unity 5.0, when our default OS became Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003 becomes the default message store. Unity 5.0 will always support Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000.

• Smartphones with Exchange 2003 and BES blackBerry torch

  Our company moves to Telus of Rogers and I am curious to know if I am able to continue to use the Server BES 4.1 existing and Exchange 2003 with new features of torch (existing devices are curves).

  Does anyone do this?

  Thank you

  Rob

  has responded

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/BlackBerry-Enterprise-solution/adding-torch-to-BES-4-1/TD-p/6...

• Exchange 2003 FrontEnd Server Down, Bank of messages of the unit down.

  Hello

  The configuration of the Exchange 2003 environment with 1 Server frontend and backend (cluster) 2 servers. The Exchange FrontEnd server is down due to the problem of relay service. All outlook and exchange related services clients are point directly to the server main exchange. This cause of unity is unable to store voice messages in the exchange store. When subscribers call for unity, system will tell the Bank to the user messages are temporary offline. How re - configure the unit to make it appear the message store? Below is the version of the unit.

  Cisco Unity Version 4.0

  Build number 4.0 (3) SR 1

  Windows Server Version Microsoft Windows 2000 version 2195 (Service Pack 3)

  Pls advise.

  Thanking in advance for your help.

  The guide of reconfiguration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/voicesw/ps2237/products_upgrade_guides_chapter09186a0080205a7f.html

  Thank you

  Keith

• How can I restore and old information store (Exchange 2003) to my Exchange Server existing (Exchange 2010)

  Nice day

  3 months ago I installed Exchange Server 2010, now I need to recover a mailbox from a backup. The backup was performed while he was still Exchange 2003. I want to know is you can restore an old Exchange 2003 database in the Exchange 2010 recovery store, and if so what is the way forward. PS I use symantec backup exec 2010 R3 as backup software.

  If it is not possible, is there any other way to retrieve mailbox information

  Any help will be much appreciated.

  Hello Wh@pd@p,

  I suggest posting your question on our forums TechNet for Microsoft Exchange Server, located here again:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

• Exchange 2003 Server kept receiving unknown Email sending out through SMTP and the paper jam in the queue folder

  Hello Sir,

  I have a problem with one of my SBS Exchange 2003 servers.

  At first, I was getting a lot of 3008 errors for a non-delivery report with a status code of 5.0.0 was generated for recipient rfc822; address email is removed from the privacy * all these repeated error messages from the event log, SMTP and Exchange Routing service...

  I looked around and discovered more than 10000 .eml in my x:\program files\exchsrv\mailroot\queue folder.  At first, I thought that my server or one of my workstations was compromised, but all workstations have local antiviral software (symantec endpoint protection), my server software also has antiviral and I have a mail server antivirus (symantec endpoint protection).  I scanned all of the computers on the network and even tried almost all of them closing to see if new entries have been created in the queue.

  Unfortunately, more than entries kept by appearing so I kept looking.  By opening one of the .eml, I discovered my own responsibility that I attach to outgoing emails if I have my server acted as a mail relay.  I checked for this and I have been clean.  I kept searching in the .eml and discovered different origins IPs of the Internet.  Am I right to assume that my mail server is BOMBED or attacked with emails with false return addresses and my mail server sends return NDR for spammers/compromised machines on the net?  I tried to stop the exchange services and tried to rename the vsi file 1 to something else as one of the suggested MSKB, but the file was protected.  How can I stop this, it's slowing down my mail server and fill out my HD.  I can't block the IP to shippers because it comes from everywhere.  Help!  There are about 2 to 5 new .eml created every minute!

  TKS and best regards,

  LT

  Hi Lennet,

  Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the forum TechNet for assistance:

  Microsoft Exchange Server

  Hope the helps of information.

• Win Server 2003 SP2. Backup starts and see errror message "error returned while creating the volume shadow copy: 0x8004230f.»

  Win Server 2003 SP2. Backup starts and see errror message "error returned while creating the volume shadow copy: 0x8004230f.» All solutions? CPP, Volume Shadow Copy Stallion are started.

  Thank you for visiting the Microsoft answers community.

  The question you have posted is related to Windows Server and would be better suited in the MS TechNet Windows Server Forum. Please visit this link to find a community that will provide the support you want.

• Best practices for Exchange 2003 with VMWare ESXi 3.5 and iSCSI SAN

  Hello guys,.

  Here's the Q? We have 1 physical Exchange 2003, the HOST of 4 and 1 iSCSI SAN with LUN 3, 1 for data, 1 for VMWare and 1 for SQL, if we're going to virtualize it, I don't know where to put data Exchage and newspapers. I do not think that that is a good practice to put together the data but I do not have another SAN. So, what can I do?

  Thank you.

  We have 813 mailbox.

  I agree with cainics, start an average size and go from there.  I know it's a production mail server and you can not exactly 'play' with the settings because this requires time, but if you do the VM too big, you would have nothing left for other virtual machines.

  I would go 2 vCPU and at least 4 GB of RAM, maybe 8GB.  There must be parameters for the Exchange mailbox 813 and X users # to implement your environments in order to get an idea of the amount of RAM that will be... 4GB seems minimal to me, but 8 GB would probably be better like that.

• SBS Server 2003 and Exchange Server - need access, but don't have HARD drive

  Hello

  A couple of years our sever dies completely, but we kept the drive HARD, but unfortunately not the CD with the software or the software key. So, I now have 2HDD, the original boot partition and the other with the data. now as well clean and fully functional and connected to an old desk. I can see everything beautiful, but I can't boot from the original boot drive (I tried simply disconnecting desktop boot disk and windows for 1 second logo shows a d, then chucks back me to the initial charge (BACK?).) The point is that I need to boot into SBS2003 with exchange server installed in order to access a handful of old emails that have become extremely important, as well as to run an old version of Filemaker server, which can run on any newer operating system

  I tried, by the way, a converter for swap files and I can see the directories but I think that, unless I paid $xxx.00 for something, which I can't afford now, so I will not get the emails and all attachments back.

  So my question is this - is anyway that I can use the original startup disk in a new hardware environment to restore sbs 200 and Exchange if you work? I paid huge sums for both, so I think I should be able to use it again!

  Thank you very much

  Gor

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

• Essbase 9.3.1 and Windows Server 2003 SP2

  Is anyone Essbase 9.3.1 successfully under Windows Server 2003 SP2?
  
  The documentation I have mentions only SP1, but we would like to upgrade to SP2 providing that there is no problems to do.
  
  Thank you
  
  Svejk

  There is no problem running on SP2.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• VMO error with the 4.0 unit (3) and CM3.3 (4)

  I'm under Unity 4.0 (3) SP1 UM to Win2003/Exchange 2003 domain. CallManager is 3.3 (4). I tried two different VMO versions on two different workstations with different versions of Outlook. I can't listen to the messages on the phone. I get an error of trap "unknown problems prevent connection to the server. It is the only function that does not work. Voicemail ports are necessary partitions in their CSS. The unit can dial the phone. MWI work. The unit plays the voicemails and emails from the phone. There is nothing in the application log of the unit.

  Any ideas?

  Run 'dcomcnfg '. Go to the tab "Properties of Default" and check "Enable Distributed COM on this computer". Do on the unity server and the client workstation.

• Deployment of Exchange 2010 in an Exchange 2003 environment

  Hello

  I recently installed Exchange 2010 in an Exchange 2003 environment.  I need help on migrating all my settings to Exchange 2010 - mailbox recipient policies, address book offline, free/busy, etc.
  I looked these TechNet following help sheets, but by getting a little confused:
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx (Exchange 2013 requirements)

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee332348.aspx (upgrade of the Exchange 2003 Client Access)

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998186.aspx (Exchange 2003 - Planning Roadmap for upgrade and Coexistence)

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee681662.aspx (to install Exchange 2010 in a mixed Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007 organization)
  I have two domain controllers.  Exchange 2010 is not installed on a domain controller, but Exchange 2003 is one of them.  I would like to eventually decommission the Exchange 2003 environment and implement and to Edge transport server in its place.  Exchange 2010 is installed on a Virtual Machine.  It running SP3, the latest service pack.  Exchange 2003 is on a physical machine, and it running SP2.
  Please help me simplify what exactly I have to do to migrate configurations from 2003 to 2010.
  Thank you for your much appreciated assistance.

  TK

  Unfortunately is not on this site.  Server questions should be asked on Technet

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home