HP probook, elitebook and zbook: GPU for rendering

Similar Questions

• OEM Apple nVidia GeForce 7300 GT is on the list of Adobe to not support GPU for rendering of the Open GL...

  My Mac Pro Radeon X 1900 XT is retired to my yard serious computer in my basement, but that goes back to the OEM Apple nVidia GeForce 7300 GT, brought encouraging results delivered with my Mac Pro.

  When I got the Mac Pro 2007, in 2009, I was running it in Mac OS 10.4.4.11 Tiger and Photoshop CS4 (11.0.0) would turn off the Open GL rendering when it detected the GeForce 7300 GT card stock, which was on the list of unsupported graphics nVidia GPU Adobe.   So, I bought a refurbished nine Apple Radeon X 1900 XT.  This card allowed to Photoshop CS4 and Bridge CS4 allow Open GL rendering.  Last year, the Radeon X 1900 XT graphics card created scratches on my screen when it is running hot and sometimes dual turns off just as I was working.  In addition, the computer was material freezes about once a day.   This morning the Mac Pro close its dual display, while I was working, and I had to make another cold cut in order to restart.  I then manually shut down the computer and doing a manual start so that Snow Leopard would use disk maintenance.

  I turned off the computer and pulled the Radeon X 1900 XT card and re-inserted the OEM Apple nVidia GeForce 7300 GT card.  Now I'm in Mac OS 10.6.8 Snow Leopard with Photoshop CS4 (11.0.2) instead of Photoshop CS4 (11.0.0).

  Now, the update to Photoshop CS4, under the most recent operating system, allowing rendering Open GL instead of disable. Physical limitation of this graphics card is now fixed, so I see no reason to buy the ATI Radeon HD 5770 Graphics Upgrade Kit for my Mac Pro:

  http://eShop.MacSales.com/item/Apple/6615718/

  Some of those who bought the Apple ATI Radeon HD 5770 will say that they always got the striping on their screen when the Radeon HD 5770 card was running hot, just like with the Radeon X 1900 XT.

  So far, Apple OEM nVidia GeForce 7300 GT works fine and I get no striping on my poster without shut-off or material display freezes.

  I'm happy to have made of Open GL to Adobe enabled with an OEM GPU graphic that works cool and requires no fan cooling anchored.  Apple OEM nVidia GeForce 7300 GT, for the Mac Pro, is on the list of Adobe to not support GPU for rendering of the Open GL under Photoshop CS4, so why is he now supported?  That is just one of the benefits of the Photoshop CS4 11.0.2 update?

  Also FYI, Adobe is not always announce or specify bug fixes in versions of update of an application, although sometimes they do.

• Y at - it a utility to monitor the speed, temperature and cpu/gpu for desektop m9200T fan?

  My desktop running Win7 Home Premium m9200T computer crashes often.  It seems to be associated with temperature.

  I tried SpeedFan, but my computer crashed whenever I ran it.  The SpeedFan 20 window scroll a few lines of text that the computer crashed.  Y at - it a utility to monitor the speed, temperature and cpu/gpu for desektop m9200T fan?

  PC Wizzard works well on my computer.

  Thanks Big_dave.

• By using the GPU for rendering? Get makes it faster?

  I'm trying to export a 20 min video I've done in After Effects. It has a few effects of particles and some effects of Audio spectrum. When I start a Render, it shows between 20 to 30 hours to complete. If I had several machines I would have no problem with that, but I did not.

  I tried most of the suggestions in the forums to try and speed up the rendering time:

  

  • Clasic made instead of Ray traced
  • Removed unused and sequences pre comps
  • Reduced the number of effects
  • reduced the number of precomps
  • reduced the number of expressions
  • Rendering with CUDA
  • Disabled motion blur
  • Disabilities to 3D layers.

  Still, I can't take the shortest rendering time. I also tried various rendering parameters:

  • YouTube 1080 p
  • Youtube720p
  • QuickTime animation
  • Lossless
  • JPEG sequence

  with no major difference (youtube 1080 p being the best)

  I noticed that the SOUL does not all the power he could. It uses around 50% of CPU, but I read that may be because it doesn't have time to ramp upward before arriving at another framework.

  I also notice that even using CUDA acceleration, SOUL does not use power of the GPU at ALL. I have two GTX780 and I'm sure that if it was their use he would accelerate a lot, but I don't know if we can use them and if possible I don't know how to activate it.

  If you are looking for any other suggestions to speed up my rendering, or instructions for making SOUL use my GPU

  Data sheet:

  • I7 - 4790K
  • 32 GB of RAM
  • 2 x GTX780

  The GPU is not rendered 99% of everything that AE. If you use the TEA to render a model of EI then AE works in the background so SOUL must leave a few resources for do you other things. With the help of SOUL is always slower rendering with the Render tail if you go to the same format, but for most of us is not a problem because we don't sit and wait for makes, work us on the next shot or move on to another project. That's the beauty of the SOUL, must never stop creating - things, you get paid for.  If it's a rush to get out the project will restore then with making Cue of EI for a codec made fast production and then run through the SOUL SOUL being much more efficient and faster video transcoding in another format.

  As far as general things AE goes, temporal effects are taking the most time to render, particles also take a long time to render. Drawn to the beam with acceleration CUDA only is absolutely not supported in SOUL even if you have a correctly configured NVIDIA GPU. I know not all professionals that use drawn with RADIUS one rendered for anything whatsoever. There are much better solutions even without 3rd party effects.

  I hope this helps. The best way to get something out of the door is to make a standard production format by using the mark to return and a quick to render format ensuring that you use the formats of standard production for all of your belongings in the Ant project that are all of the images used in your publication to scale to 100% at some point in your comp (a lot of people try to make photo slideshows in HD with 20 images of a DSLR MP and all of them are resized way down). Once you have your master of standard production format that fall into the SOUL to generate your deliverables.

  Currently AE will not use 100% of your system resources when rendering HD or even 4 K video because AE watch only 1 frame at a time and any modern processor can easily treat an image using a fraction of its power. Then, we need to calculate everything again. Certain effects will use more memory a temporal effects and particles can quickly fill the memory, but until the basic architecture of the AE render engine is completely revamped we're stuck with makes it slow.

  Just FYI a little... Many of my composite complex can take 1 or 2 minutes per image for rendering. Some have taken 5 or 6 minutes. My 'pencil tests' or movement work almost always with little or no effects just to check the appearance of the animation. I call them pencil tests, test the hosts traditional photo pencil sketches to check the action and blocking before sending frames out to ink and paint because it makes no sense to paint on a stage where you don't know if Bambi walks funny because you didn't run a pencil and ink. In any case, my 'pencil tests' or previews make usually about 7 to 10 frames per second. It's the range of my work. Most production companies who are trying to earn a living do effects and editing have a fairly strict set of standards for travel times. Only, they conceive their work to fit into this mold.

• Proscribed classic 3D GPU for rendering

  Hello

  I do the video with AE and I use 3D classic ray tracing because some problem (5070::12).

  I have a GTX 970 and when rendering or when I work on the composition rendering is very very slow and use gpu is always at 0%

  Does anyone have a solution?

  PS: Sorry for my English

  Classic 3D ever used the GPU in the first place. We must accept it as it is.

  Mylenium

• Why doesn't Premiere Pro use my GPU for rendering?

  Hi all

  I bought two GTX 770 s in order to render super fast with the wonderful first Mecrury playback engine. The issue I'm having is, I realized a project right now, but there is no any purpose of my GPU. My CPU is stationary at 55-80% usage, so I was wondering what was going on.

  Any kind of upsetting my investment has gone to waste. Thank you!

  robin5693 wrote:

  My CPU is stationary at 55-80% usage, so I was wondering what was going on.

  It is possible that no matter what your project is not accelerated by GPU, or can be done by using the GPU.  Read this blog post by Todd K, which describes what Pr can do using a GPU (or two... or three...)  Follow the links to understand the list of effects that are accelerated, etc..

• GPU acceleration for rendering of the command line?

  Hello

  is it possible to use CUDA for batch returns with many projects on the command-line tool aerender?

  A nVidia TESLA GPU would increase significantly the performance? Or just the 570/580 and GPU taken Quadro supported?

  Kind regards

  Nuke poison

  www.poisonnuke.de

  N °

  The GPU matter hardly at all for After Effects. After effects uses CUDA to all and especially to use OpenGL for rendering of low fidelity insight. Don't waste your time thinking about the GPU for After Effects.

  See this video for more details:

  http://www.video2brain.com/en/videos-5359.htm

• Upgrade GPU for Studio XPS 435MT and indine power load max

  Hi, I have a Studio XPS 435MT with a 360W power supply and an ati radeon HD4800 series GPUs (likely a 4850). I want to improve the gpu with a gpu from Gainward GeForce GTX 750 2 GB (one slot), GDDR5. It uses just 55W and there is no external power supply plug, the HD4800, but in the GTX card appears: minimum 300W or more system power supply (with a minimum of 12V current rating of 20A). And I do not know if this 20 a could be a problem, because my Delta DPS-360FB-1 diet doesn't seem to reach the rated current.

  What do you suggest me?

  Thank you

  combined maximum 12V 12VA and 12VB output for this unit is 300W which is 25, but you can't have your cake and eat it too.

  If you draw 20 amps on the 12v rail you used 240W leaving 60W for everything else that needs 12V.

  And if you use 300W on the 12v rail that leaves 60W max for the 5v / 3.3V through less 10W to + 5VSB.

  GTX 750 will be in this case either well, or it does not at all due to the lack of power on one or more tracks.

  HD4850 certainly consumes MORE energy than a GTX750 so that only one point of view, it should be good.

  

• Can I then set up my new and old iMac to use both for rendering first and consequences?

  Can I then set up my new and old iMac to use both for rendering first and consequences?  No special installation required?

  and...

  If I understand correctly, your ability under the license agreement to install the software

  on the two systems don't allow for simultaneous use on both systems!

  but...

  for EI, there is the "Adobe after effects Render Engine"

  documented here:

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/after-effects/using/automated-rendering-network-rendering.html#NET work_rendering_with_watch_folders_and_render_engines

  "In After Effects CS6 and later versions, you can now run aerender or use spyware file.

  non-redevance rolling mode, serialization not require it. » !!!

  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

• Need of GPU for Dell 4600 trying to video in Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum

  My old Dell 4600 was great for surfing the internet, but will not make a video.  The pop-up indicates that no GPU is available.  Running Windows 7 Home Premium 32 - bit with 1.5 GB of RAM.  Is there a way relatively inexpensive to add a NVIDIA GPU (rendering accelerated by GPU STROKE requires a compatible NVIDIA driver 185.pour xx or later version with a GeForce GT 2xx series or the new GPU and CUDA GPU)? Information taken from the Sony site.

  No. 2XX series is PCI-E, which means a Dimension 8400 or later version.

  More old machine that I would recommend would be Optiplex GX620 tower with windows 7.

  Best machine would be Precision 380 with windows 7.

  

• GPU for iphone 4S air 3.4 decrease of performance

  Hello, im building a mobile app to air 3.4 actionscript in flash builder 4.7 for iphone. This is my first application.

  the main function of this application is to play the movieclips exported from flash in 1 swc.

  After adding on stage clips are being put across the 4 times as big and plays.

  so the problem is that I discovered that you can change mode yourappname - app.xml rendering

  I changed it to auto - with auto on, I have 60/60 fps - when I switched to gpu I get 20/60 fps and app starts to lagg.

  I tested it on exported ipa installed via itunes, whas test done on iphone 4S

  What can be the cause of this? at what point is the power of the gpu for air mobile apps?

  any advice? should I switch to air 3.5?

  http://www.andymoore.ca/2012/01/how-to-improve-your-mobile-as3air-performance/

  It was very helpful!

  all of this is because of the vector based animations. I can cook that movieClips image by image

• My pavilion dv6 3031sa has wrong GPU for its model

  So I bought a new card system for my laptop online without knowing which model, he came, so I checked the Bios for the product number which is XB531EA #ABU. Then I checked the HP drivers website and enter the product number that says the model number is Dv6-3031sa. When I studied the specs of this model, it is said that the GPU in this Council should be Radeon HD 5470 m. However detected updates driver Radeon 5650 m, hardware in Device Manager ID confirms that it is a 5650 m

  PCI\VEN_1002 & DEV_68C1 & SUBSYS_1440103C & REV_00
  PCI\VEN_1002 & DEV_68C1 & SUBSYS_1440103C
  PCI\VEN_1002 & DEV_68C1 & CC_030000
  PCI\VEN_1002 & DEV_68C1 & CC_0300

  It's a better GPU, so I'm not complaining, just area why the model and the GPU is the football game. Thank you

  Hey @LBrad ,

  The system comes to shows me that it is a re-engineering. No other information. If you need it, you can call our technical support at the 800-474-6836. If you do not live in the United States / Canada region, please click on the linkfor the number of support in your region. They will be happy to help you immediately.
  
  Thank you.

• Qosmio X 300-130 and Linux - GPU fan does not turn

  Hello

  I recently I changed my windows form of os for linux... and I realized that my gpu fan not spinning.
  eventhought it spinned in windows.

  When I turn on the pc two fans that the processor and the fan GPU continue until I connect to linux and then the GPU of the fan stops... and the GPU GET VERY HIGH TEMPERATURE

  Please it is urgent

  What do you recommend?
  I think it is driver related.
  THANKS IN ADVANCE :)

  Qosmio X 300-130 (PQX32E)

  Hello

  Use the following command to get information from the ACPI:
  dmesg | grep - I have fan

  From my point of view of the rare, the fans are controlled by ACPI and this allows to work with the BIOS to monitor the temperature of the core.

  The different distributions like Debian or Ubuntu Linux supports a fancontrol script (the latter can be downloaded separately) that can be configured to handle the speed of the fan.

  In addition I would also recommend to upgrade the Linux kernel if possible.

• EliteBook 820 G3: stylus for Elitebook 820 G3

  I want to buy a pen for my G3 of 820 Elitebook and would appreciate any suggestions or lists of useful pen

  Ball capacitive EliteBook 820 G3 Stylus
  
  And
  
  http://Boxwave.myshopify.com/products/mini-capacitive-HP-EliteBook-820-G3-stylus-pen

• Has anyone got the upgrade of GPU for H8-1234 with motherboard HP M3970AM HP (Angelica2)?

  I improved my diet for a Corsair CX series CX500M 500W ATX 80 Plus Bronze modular power supply 12V successfully and I want to assure you that I have buy a compatible GPU for the motherboard.

  If I go to http://www.pc-specs.com/mobo/HP/HP_M3970AM-HP (Angelica2) _ / 2042 and click on compatible GPU it lists AMD and Nvidia cards.

  The series of HD AMD goes up to the HD6000 series and does not list any HD 7000 series.

  The only Nvidia 600 series which is decent is the GeForce GTX-660-670-680 or 690.

  The site also shows (these graphics cards have an appropriate interface to work with and integrate into the HP M3970AM - (Angelica2). Because this motherboard does not have a GPU chip on board, we have also limited GPU integrated only to those which are integrated to die of a CPU.)

  Cards GTX listed are all much more expensive than 650 Ti DirectCU OC Boost 1085 MHZ 2 GHz 6.0 GB GDDR5 2xDVI card PCI-E HDMI DP that is not listed or even GTX550 TI, which is not listed

  The Amd HD listed series cards are unavailable or more expensive than most of the HD 7000 series.

  Has anyone successfully installed a card $ 100 from low to medium priced which is a significant improvement on the hd 7450? If you could please let me know what graphics card you purchaced.

  Thank you

  Gbrown13, welcome to the forum.

  The limiting factor for the video card upgrade is the power supply unit (PSU).  It is 300W.  Intermediate level maps latest require at least 400W to work properly.  7450 HD comes with the computer has been designed for HP operate with OEM PSU.  A detail 7450 HD very probably would not work.  In addition, you should limit the length of the video card to no more than 9 ".  This ensures that it fits in the space provided.  The majority of the double cards are 1.5 "wide.  These are normally without any problems.

  I hesitate to recommend a video card on the grounds that it will be much better than an existing map.  It is difficult to say that this is the case.  Here is a map which might work for you, with an upgrade of the power supply.  Read the reviews to see what users have to say about it.

  If your problem is solved, please click "accept as a Solution.