I "sorry - East (my mind) gateway router?"

Similar Questions

• "Gateway router not found" error when you try to connect the TiVO DVR with DLink router.

  Original title: gateway router not found

  try to connect the tivo series 2 to the internet with dlink router that he used to work with previous tivo but not with tivo now, it says gateway router not found
  However, my laptop works fine with the router, I tried tivo support nothing helps, too, if I use the phone line works of tivo, but do not store a lot and is running out of room so it will not work fo rme, helllpppppppp thanks

  Hello

  Where exactly you get this error message?

  See the troubleshooting suggested in "Network error message N07 or C107" steps from this link.

  If you try to connect the tivo series 2 to the internet with dlink router then check out the link below:

  http://support.TiVo.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/400

  Please contact the manufacturer.

• I got alltel for internet and had to get a craddlepoint router now since switching to ellementmobile I had to get a gateway router cdw530am mdl, but it won't work on my computer at home?

  I had alltell for my internet and had to get a craddelpoint router so I could use my home computer and laptop at the same time, but given that the switch to mobile really, I had to get a combo wifi broadband gateway mdl cdw530am, but now my home computer does not connect to the router , but the laptop with no promblem has anyone else had this problem?     any help would be greatly appreciatted!

  Install the drivers for your new device

  Good luck!

• Using WRT54GS as a point with a gateway router

  My family just moved into a new House, and the package Internet for our DSL included installation of a router wireless (non-Linksys) and the (plugged into the DSL modem) Internet gateway down in the basement.  The problem is that the intensity of the signal on the 2nd floor is very low, sometimes non-existent.  Since we have a Linksys WRT54GS router v.2 lying around the previous House, I thought that I would try to put up with our main router, to set up a new network on the 2nd floor by using the ethernet connection.

  But I keep running into trouble.  I have reset the router so that I know how to find all the settings and I can now access the admin wireless page and I managed to change the network name, and also to configure encryption.  That's all before you connect to the Internet, so of course I can only access the admin page and nothing else.

  But once I plug the ethernet cable - which leads directly to the bridge down - router the Linksys router just stopped working and is no longer distributes all packets at all when I check the connection details.  It does not even serve to the top of the admin page, even if my computer indicates a connection.  Reset the cords for connection to a "Limited or no connectivity" error, both with the wireless connection and also a wired connection using a standard ethernet cable to the back of the Linksys router in my computer.  It's as if plug the Linksys router on the Internet (i.e. the other router) it freezes or it confuses.  I can only make it work again by disconnecting the active Internet cable and turn off the router and then turn it back on.

  I tried to change the mode of operation to the router, and I also changed the default address of my other router (192.168.1.1, which otherwise, would share it with the Linksys router) out of the way but none of it works.

  Once again, I can access the admin wireless page and make all kinds of changes to the installation and get it works perfectly - until I plug my other router (i.e., for reference, a TRENDnet TEW-432BRP) Linksys.

  Since all wired computers work fine with the TRENDnet router modem, I am writing to you guys for helping me understand how to configure the Linksys router to work with her too, so I can use wireless on the 2nd floor of this House.

  Of course, if you think this is impossible for some reason, please let me know so that I can live with it and get my life back.

  Thank you very much.

  Well, you can try this... Cascade of the router...

  Just connect a computer directly to the router Linksys - access your router (WRT54GS) setup and change the default address to 10.10.10.1, let the 'Enabled' DHCP server and save the changes... Wait a minute, unplug the power cable from your router, wait 30 seconds and reconnect the power cable...

  Now connect your router to bridge its Ethernet Port to the Internet Port Linksys router... See if you can connect to the Internet...

• Video support for voice gateway router can call?

  Hi all

  My gateway voice (Cisco 2921-V/K9) router to connect to the PSTN using SIP Trunk provider. CUCM 11 enter my ipphone and videoconferencing (SX20).

  If someone who using video-conferencing (SX20) to call my (SX20) videoconferencing via dial my number RTC, it only not Visual voice call of appeal.

  I have question: If the router voice gateway support video call?, if it can how to configure and there is an additional module?

  Thank you

  Cyriac

  Hi Cyriac,

  For a video call from point to point, you can see the "Configure the video telephony" section of the following link

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/CUCM/Admin/9_1_1/CCMS...

  If video conferencing Setup check the following "feature Deprecation announces for video Conferencing and transcoding using PVDM3 on ISR G2 product Bulletin"

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/...

  Manish

• Two RV016, gateway to gateway, routing over VPN

  Hello

  I have two RV016, I have a vpn connection from gateway to gateway between the two and I can ping computers on both sides, but I can't reach the third lan (10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0). I can join this network to routerA but not of routerB.

  My Network typology:

  

  Configuration of routers (see attachments)

  How can I configure static routes on router B?

  I tried to do, but it does not work (see RouterB_routing.jpg)

  Can someone help me?

  Thank you.

  Krzysztof,

  
  

  Unfortunately the rv016 you cannot make static through the vpn tunnel routes as it isn't an ipsec interface in the static routes section of the router.  This is normal, the router will recognize that the default setting of lan in the vpn tunnel.

  
  

  You need to business routers to make the static routes through the ipsec tunnel.

• Question card crypto for VPN gateway router

  I'm moving my VPN environment at 2811 routers. I move a seller more tomorrow which has two sources who need to connect to each of our IPs, those inside the IPs are NAT had real IPS at the firewall behind the router. I know I'll find out tomorrow, but thought I would see if anyone see a problem with this ACL that is used for the encryption card, is there a problem with multiple sources (50.50.50.1 et.2 in file) connection to the same destinations? The IP addresses in this file are not real output IPs. Thank you.

  If I understand you correctly, no it should not be a problem at all. Each entry in your crypto ACLs card will create a separate IPSEC security association pair and there is no overlap.

  Let me know if I misunderstood your question.

  Jon

• SG300-52. Prefer to send traffic to the default gateway rather than static route? Network stops if I disable ICMP redirects.

  I have 4 switches, each act as their own with a 26 subnet mask. They have static routes for every other switch. The firewall has a static route to each switch. If I unplug the LAN of the Firewall interface, traffic stops the flow of the switches. If I block the side LAN firewall, ICMP redirects, traffic stalls outside.

  So if you are connected to this switch, say that you pull an ip address of 192.168.122.20. Your front door is the 192.168.122.62 switch. If you try to access a server 192.168.127.142, the SG300 sends your traffic to 192.168.127.254 to get an ICMP redirect, rather than simply to communicate directly with 192.168.127.50.

  My network 'basic' is 192.168.127.0/24 vlan1 and the firewall is 192.168.127.254

  This is the route of one of my switches table (which has 192.168.122.0/26 and ports run on vlan122)

   Maximum Parallel Paths: 1 (1 after reset) IP Forwarding: enabled Codes: > - best, C - connected, S - static S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/1] via 192.168.127.254, 73:48:13, vlan 1 C 192.168.122.0/26 is directly connected, vlan 122 S 192.168.123.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.123, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.124.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.124, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.125.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.125, 73:48:14, vlan 1 C 192.168.127.0/24 is directly connected, vlan 1 

  In any case, what gives? Why the switch would first try to send the stream to the firewall?

  EDIT: Here is the server routing table:

   [email protected]/* */:~$ ip route show default via 192.168.127.254 dev eth0 192.168.122.0/26 via 192.168.127.122 dev eth0 192.168.123.0/26 via 192.168.127.123 dev eth0 192.168.124.0/26 via 192.168.127.124 dev eth0 192.168.125.0/26 via 192.168.127.125 dev eth0 192.168.127.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.127.142 

  Hi Jonathan,.

  I'm sorry. I misunderstood the routing table you want to accomplish. Your concern seems relevant given that the matching rule more will be selected instead of one: page 275 http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/sf30x_sg30x/...

  ... "When the routing of traffic, the next hop is decided based on the longest match on the prefix (LPM algorithm). A destination IPv4 address might match several routes in the IPv4 static routing Table. The device uses the matching route with the higher, subnet mask that is, the longest match on the prefix. "...

  So go ahead and report it to the support team so the guys can make the laboratory, confirm it and declare additional:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/Web/TSD-Cisco-small-business-suppor...

  Kind regards

  Aleksandra

• How to apply policy endpoint to gateway instead of the switch router

  Dear team,

  I propose ISE to the customer. They want to deploy ISE as point policy and central authentication for users in the branches. I would ask whether this scenario is possible:

  -When the client of the user is connected to the access switch, the switch uses 802.1 x or MAB switch port

  -After the authentication, as long as the normal method, we will push a dACL or VLAN change in ISE for approval instructions. But the customer will not apply ACL port on the switch. They want to apply the policy to the gateway router.

  So is it possible to do? I am SGT but I have no experience in this regard. Please help solve this problem. Thank you very much.

  Kind regards

  Hiep Nguyen.

  Hiep,

  You can use authentication proxy to push the ACL for users on the router. However, ACL based port is your best approach because you can determine the authorization at the port level and if the user moves so no politics.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Problem of routing in PIX 515E

  Hi all

  I have a problem here with the routing routing in PIX515E version 6.35. I have a few Client PC located in the DMZ of the PIX515E interface, they connect to the PIX using Cisco VPN Client (IPSEC VPN), once these computers can be routed to access servers (static route) located behind internal PIX interfaces. I have a few servers remotely with access to the Internet, the gateway router to connect remotely to PIX Outside (Internet) Interface using IPSEC VPN and then routed inside the Interface (static route).

  After establishing a VPN IPSEC computers Client behind the DMZ interfaces can access servers located behind the internal Interface of a PIX. So do the remote servers. However, the Client computers cannot access remote servers.

  I was wondering if there are any restrictions for the delivery in PIX?

  Thanks for the reply.

  Hello

  Thanks for posting, sorry for the late reply, been a little busy!

  I'm not to clear on how you route your networks, I personally try to be more specific in what is routed where when the static use of the routes that the large 16s prefixes.

  you have vpn l2l to allow remote access within your acl as crypto 172.16.0.199/32 to your server:
  Access ip 172.16.0.0 Remote_Server list allow 255.255.0.0 host 172.16.0.199

  and also you have cleared nat rule:
  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  for the resources of DMZ RA VPN 172.16.45.129 for server access through this VPN L2L wallpaper external interface, you need to activate in your acl L2L Tunnel end as well as for the valuable traffic.

  The end has access-list for the tunnel L2L is allowing the network of Client VPN ID?

  I would also like to add to your rule exempt Ant configuration on interface dmz as you do with inside interface

  NAT 0 access-list sheep (dmz)

  Let us know how it works, I'll be back on your config and after some more later.

  Concerning

• Cannot access the gateway/DHCP WS2012

  Hi all

  For some reason any Windows Server 2012 machine cannot access my gateway (router). I got a new modem/router ATT (NVG589) so I got rid of my dlink router DGL4500. For some reason my server cannot get an IP from the DHCP on the router (windows is currently giving a private ip address). The dlink gateway is 192.168.0.1, and the new is 192.168.1.254. I have tried to put a static IP address, flush the dns, set it to automatic and searched online, nothing seems to work. When I plug the dlink again, the server is able to get an ip address from it. Am I missing something that I must specially configured in the NVG589? or y at - it something on the server, I need to change?

  Hello

  For questions on Windows Server 2012 you can post your question to the TechNet forums. They will be able to guide you to the best.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

• two questions of routing VLAN fast

  Let's say that I have spend a routing 4 L3 VLAN

  VLAN 1 192.168.10.0/24, virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.10.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 2 is 192.168.20.0/24, the virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.20.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 3 is 192.168.30.0/24, the virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.30.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 4 192.168.40.0/24, virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.40.254 inside this vlan

  There is that a single router out of this switch at the net, and lets say that it is in VLAN 1 and its address is 192.168.10.1

  first question - inside the L3 switch I need to add a default route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1

  to ensure that all traffic not matching only a 192.168.x.x address not know where to go to the net, correct?

  Second - when this router, is there a difference if I use the following static route:

  192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254

  Instead of

  192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254

  ?

  Whatever happens, the package comes to switch L3, but in one case, what happened to it through the interface VLAN 1 VLAN and in the other case, he gets there through the interface VLAN VLAN for which traffic is intended anyway. is what im trying to figure out, this will make a difference at all? especially with regard to broadcast packets?

  If it makes no difference, then it is safe to say that the following static route would be optimal?

  192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.10.254

  Re "of all". Fix. The L3 switch will route traffic based on its routing table. By default, he knows all IP subnets, it is directly connected to, i.e. all subnets VLAN. If you must add a route by default manually or not depends on the exact implementation. It would be nice if the L3 switch will use the no default for routing gateway that you use for the switch IP parameters itself (if there is an option in the web interface to set a default gateway). If you cannot define a default gateway on the L3 switch, you might have to manually add a static route. The easiest way would be to check the current routing table and see if there is a default or not gateway.

  Re "then." A router can only transfer the packets to the next hop router. The next hop router must be connected to this router. The route "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254" is correct for a router with IP address 192.168.10.1 and 255.255.255.0 as 192.168.10.254 subnet mask is connected to the router. "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254" is not correct. The router cannot learn the path to a subnet specific 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 using a gateway on that subnet. It is not correct to use this kind of a route and do not use it even if it might work even (because the router is a simple query ARP to find the MAC address of the 192.168.20.254 and your L3 switch will respond to the ARP request, even if it's on the internet of 192.168.10.254). At the same time that another router between 10 and 20 subnets it would work no more...

  Re your conclusion: I recommend to keep four static routes to subnets existing on the L3 switch instead of put in a single subnet more great which includes a lot of addresses that are not connected here. Technically, this works if you only use working IP addresses. But you will see some loops if you send something to 192.168.55.50 or similar. The gateway router it will send to the L3 switch that will return to the catwalk. They should understand it's a loop, but still, I would not recommend this type of installation... Add routes for each of the L3 switch subnet...

• A "N" router will make a difference?

  I have currently a cable modem and Linksys router Linksys Wireless 'G '. I have my desktop connected via ethernet to the router port, and I use the wireless router for an Acer laptop and a ROKU box, watch NetFlix streaming videos.  As much as I fear, I get an adequate return out of my system.  My ISP is Suddenlink, which provides a "signal of 8.6," by their support.

  My wife was reading that we should have a "N" router for what we do: occasionally buy music that we upload and every night watch a video on the ROKU box.  I use usually just the Acer laptop to surf the web while I watch TV ("for example, sign in to NBC during the Cup playoffs Stanley for ' bonus camera coverage," etc.).

  After watching different Linksys routers in Best Buy today, I'm confused... I think so. The graph on the squares of the E1000, E2000 and E3000 do seem to say that for our needs (music download and watch streaming video), we "need" an E2000 and E3000.  But in my mind, the router doesn't do 'process' signal that comes through the modem and a router more capacity (or faster) would not increase performance. The performance would be limited by what Suddenlink is sending me through the cable modem.  OR - Suddenlink sends me a signal that could be improved - the wireless (laptop and ROKU) and cable (office) - if I would spring for an E2000 and E3000?  In other words, the N Router pourrait to improve performance on my G Router (present).

  I realize, this is a 'verbose issue', but if someone could respond, I would be happy.  Thank you!

  As above, what speed is supplied by your provider.  Most DSL and cable services provide your service via a 10Mbps connection.  In this case, your wireless-G router to the computer/ROKU box is already faster while at 54Mbps, and upgrade to Wireless-N 300 Mbps does not accelerate whats from the internet, which is transferred from one computer to the other.  Basically, your internet traffic is limited by the connection of your provider.

• Cannot access router EA3500 to change settings

  I would like to make a few changes to the configuration of my router, but can't access the configuration screens. I tried Smart Wifi and myrouter.local.  After entering my password, it hangs on "Waiting."... "and I never have to the configuration screens.  What I am doing wrong?

  Hi there, lindsayla18! It is possible that the IP address (192.168.1.1) of the EA3500 may have changed. You try to access the wireless user interface? It is preferable that you access with the cable from the computer to the router.

  Try to get the IP address and the default gateway ('router' for Mac) of the connected computer and use this default gateway to access the user interface.
  Last resort would be to reset and reconfigure the EA3500. You still have to, do it connected to the router.

• WRT600N advanced routing problems / use as Access Point and switch

  Firmware 1.01.36 build 4 The WRT600N is connected to an existing LAN and is really only used as a Wireless N access point. There is nothing plugged into the WAN port; only the LAN port. I have NAT disabled. All traffic from a client connected to the WRT600N wireless going very well for the gateway and the Internet router. The customer experience is very good. However, there are a few minor issues as follows.

  1] Setup > Advanced Routing tab has only the following options; to do this, * not * have a picker 'Mode '. NAT, static routing and dynamic routing (RIP).    IS this NORMAL, OR should HAVE a MODE (e.g. switch) AS REFERRED to IN THE HELP FILES?

  [2] even if a connection wireless or wired to the WRT600N works very well, the WRT600N himself is unable to connect to the internet. It cannot connect to NTP to set the time and I can't ping past the gateway router using the ping of the WRT600N diagnostic utility. I ping the gateway 192.168.1.4 port inside, but I can't use the diagnostic the WRT600N ping ping utility something beyond this gateway port. The routing of the WRT600N table is below. THE GATEWAY SHOULD NOT BE 192/168.1.4? HOWEVER THE WRT600N DON'T ME LETS NOT CHANGE IT.

  Destination LAN IP Subnet Mask gateway interface

  192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.71 LAN & Wireless

  127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 * LAN & Wireless

  Topic 1. Linksys, used to have a mode option to switch between the modes 'Bridge' and 'router '. The latest routers call it now better NAT power. Gateway mode means THAT NAT is enabled. Router mode means THAT NAT is disabled. The help files are probably a little bit over. But the option is still the same.

  Re 2. It's normal if you use it as only access point (i.e. do not use the WAN port). The router always takes into account that the internet connection via the WAN port, i.e. it will always use the default gateway on the WAN port. If nothing is connected to the WAN port on the router itself has no default gateway and therefore has no access to the internet. Generally, you are not able to establish the default route in either advanced routing page. It is a known limit of these routers if you do not use as a router.