Instability of connection WAN R7000 Nighthawk

Similar Questions

• How can I get my Windows Vista laptop to connect to my Netgear R7000 Nighthawk

  I just bought a router Netgear R7000 AC1900 Nighthawk.  I works very well with all my computers with any operating systems except my wife of Acer Windows Vista.  Netgear technology could not operate either except when we connected as a guest without security protection.  I do not to run like that because of the lack of security.  The technology said that my version of Vista apparently did not have the right drivers for the router.  It works very well with my connected Ethernet Windows XP system, so it seems strange that the old system would have to the newer system drivers with no.  Anyone have any ideas?

  You have a NETGEAR router.

  How to set up and use your Netgear router:

  http://www.downloads.NETGEAR.com/files/GDC/r7000/R7000_UM_10Oct13.PDF

  See you soon.

• R7000 Nighthawk Wired is faster than the wireless

  I currently use a Nighthawk R7000 and after the speed test internet using speedtest.net, I found that a desktop computer that is connected directly with ethernet is more than 100 Mbps faster than a wireless laptop which is the only room away from the router (wired office gets 140 ~-~ 160 Mbit/s, while the laptop is ~ 30-40 ~ Mbps). Any help would be great.

  Thanks to all who tried to help, but he had a friend IT of my father who came and said: it's a certain chip (or something of the kind) in my computer that was wrong, so we got a Linksys adapter Max - Stream AC600 WiFi Micro USB. I can now get 90 Mbits/s download. Thanks again for everyone's help.

• Drops connection WAN LRT214

  Hello

  I just put up my new LRT214 as a replacement for my D-Link standard DWR-921.

  My ISP have active DHCP and my old router was just set up to automatically get and it just worked.

  Now I have implemented mt LRT214 in the same way. Router mode: Bridge, WAN: get an ip via DHCP. Nothing else configured.

  Now, after a minute or so he obtain an IP and DNS, default GW. Everything is great and I can't Web browser.

  Now, after a minute or two then the connection to the Wan has been abandoned. Wait a minute and his place again. Another minute and it falls again. And so on and so forth.

  Check the system log:

  Time Event-Type Message
  Jul 9 20:01:59 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:02:02 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:06:57 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 62.212.73.138:60000->5.103.237.176:5632 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:07:20 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:07:39 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:07:39 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:07:46 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:07:52 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:08:36 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:08:56 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:09:07 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 118.249.91.161:18339->5.103.237.176:1433 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:09:28 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 199.168.141.47:18339->5.103.237.176:1433 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:10:03 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:10:22 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:10:22 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:10:51 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 222.186.52.2:6000->5.103.237.176:5904 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:11:37 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:12:00 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:00 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 62.75.145.240:67->5.103.237.176:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:00 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:27 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:27 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:12:33 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:51 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 77.105.106.32:67->5.103.237.176:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:13:20 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 222.186.51.72:50989->5.103.237.176:22 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:15:10 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 80.85.84.75:43601->5.103.237.176:5800 on eth1
  

  If I put my old D-link between WAN and LRT214 (in router mode), then everything works perfectly, but not an ideal of facilities at all.

  Have I misconfigured / you forgot something?

  Concerning

  Casper

  Which firmware version are you running?

  Try disabling the "Block WAN request" under the firewall settings.

• VPN spans more than two connections WAN on Cisco ASA?

  Hello

  I have a quick question for you guys, I'm not too sure if you can do it.

  Basically, you connect two offices together and need higher bandwidth between sites via VPN. The main site has a leased line and the remote site has a SDSL connection with a secondary line ADSL with another provider, in failover mode.

  There is a Cisco ASA 5520 to the master branch and 5510 remotely, with a VPN site-to site between sites.  Is it possible to use the command-line failover to increase our bandwidth over the site to site VPN? I mean, it's create a VPN link combined with the two WAN?

  DrayTek have a feature on their 2930 series that allows you to perform this VPN called trunk/collage. I was wondering if this is possible on the Cisco ASA? If not, is anyway could I do this with any additional material? I don't want to use the Draytek to the mainsite, obviously because the load he'd probably kill, but I'm not against the use of this on the remote site in front of the ASA.

  Thanks in advance.

  There is no feature of the ASA that does what you ask, as much as I KNOW.

  Depending on your traffic profile, you might be able to hack a solution by creating two VPN site-to-site (one per SDSL) and other agents via ADSL and by applying the cryptomap for a portion of the traffic to one and the rest of the traffic to the other.

• R7000 nighthawk had to be reset every day

  I use this router for apple TV, Sony phone, iPhone, they are able to connect the signal of 5G.

  but I need to reset the router for Macbook pro search for the 5G signal every time when I need to connect.

  Is it possible to fix this?

  I changed the channel of my 5 GHz from 36 to 153,

  changed from 2.4 GHz to 12,

  then my macbook pro is able to connect and search for the 5 GHz SSID,

  Maybe I lived in an apartment in the building,

  too many channel are would get together,

  so my iphone can connect, but the macbook does not.

  You should check your region with the same channel,

  It can affect your connection.

  Thanks for the support guys.

  I have the sort later

• R7000 Nighthawk Firmware Version V1.0.6.28_1.1.83

  Running the FW indicated in the title. What version should I run for performance and stability?

  @Bdad We have released a new official firmware 1.0.5.64. See this link for the release notes.

  This should also fix issues of 2.4 GHz. Feel free to update, redefinition and reconfigure. Provide us with details if you encounter problems.

• How can I connect my Nighthawk R8000 X 6 wireless (no cable) to another wireless router?

  I'm trying to connect my R8000 Nighthawk X 6 to a different router, I have downstairs, but I need you to connect wireless because I don't have a cable running towards him. I can't find the right options on the admin INTERFACE. Can anyone help?

  You can purchase some powerline connectors and connect the R8000 as Point to access your main router. Better than nothing...

• No WAN connection since the upgrade to 2.2.0.7

  Today, I upgraded my 2.1.71 to 2.2.0.7 SA520.

  After restarting connect WAN was down, even after 20 minutes.

  Switched back 2.1.71 and connection WAN has been upward in a short time.

  I retried 2.2.0.7 but same result WAN down.

  Journal of my last essay is attached.

  I hope someone can help me.

  Thank you in advance.

  Axel

  Hello

  Please use our forum

  Hi Axel, my name is Johnnatan and I'm part of the community of support to small businesses. After upgrading the firmware of your devices, make a factory reset of your device and without any configuration, try to connect to your WAN interface. If the connection still down, please contact our support team in order to help you. * Remember always make a backup of your configuration.

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  I hope you find this helpful answer * please mark the issue as response or note the answer so that other know when an answer has been found.

  Greetings,

  Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

  Support of Cisco network engineer.

• Connections RV042G Dual WAN

  We are a Cisco DPC3825 provided by our ISP cable modem connection.  It has been configured to act as a switch only.  They provided us with 2 static IP addresses.

  When each WAN port is connected individually, all right.  I see the IP addresses on the respective WAN port, and it works fine.

  When I connect the two WAN ports to the modem at the same time, I see a large amount of traffic between the WAN ports, as indicated by the port LEDs, and the RV042G becomes totally inadmissible through its web interface.

  How can I get the RV042G working with two connected WAN ports?

  Hi Rory, I'm not sure that the CPD is designed to aggregate in this way traffic. I wouldn't be surprised if he made a loop network, especially if you see a lot of broadcast or multicast packets.

  The most typical deployment has usually 2 connections that are unique modems.  I would suspect your 2 static IP addresses are on the same subnet / block ip that the router do not know how to react to load balance this scenario since he's going to the same destination in turn causing a loop until resources are consumed.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• R7000 as router with the router for mobile broadband Internet

  Hey guys. First of all, my apologies for my somewhat inadequate English skills. Secondly, I am brand new to the community, so apologies in advance for any fault :-) Third stop, apologize for having a complete beginner :-D

  So, for the issue: I recently bought a router top mobile broadband 4G (4 G MBR) to my apartment, because of the gap of strength and speed signal very low quality of the cable to the ground on my Street (fiber is to come next year).

  But the router provided by my operator isn't on par with my router R7000 Nighthawk when he comes to reach wifi, wifi speed, number of outputs of LAN and power of the processor.

  So, I want to use my R7000 my router, the internet signal from the air to the 4G MBR, then by cable to the WAN of the R7000.
  In other words; I want to just 4G MBR to simply pass / transfer the internet signal to my nighthawk R7000 router so I can use the R7000 as my router, LAN and wifi.

  How can I set this up?

  Thanks for your help!

  Update: the MBR has been no help at all. As far as I could tell, there is no possibility to bridge or pass-through mode. The R7000, as she does the work. I just put it in AP mode, adjust all the wired connections DHCP/auto IP assign and everything works great.

• The R7000 in Bridge Mode installation program

  I'm the new owner of two routers in R7000 Nighthawk. An I configured as a router - it is connected to a modem cable from Arris Surfboard 6190 and work perfectly with wire and wirelsss customers who are connected.

  I want to put in place the other Nighthawk in mode bridge next to the audio-visual equipment that I use mainly for broadcasting. I have install the second Nighthawk and configured using the bridge in accordance with these instructions. I have ethernet connecting the Nighthawk router upstaris in office and Nighthawk bridge in the room AV. I waited as the two devices connect via ethernet cable (which is connected through a port on the router's LAN and the WAN port in the bridge), but it's not happening - shows the bridge as it is connected to the wireless router. In addition, I have devices (e., g Apple TV) connected by ethernet bridge, but in terms of devices connected to the router, these devices have a wireless network, not a wired connection.

  Am I wrong in my setup? Thanks to adcvance!

  -Scot

  I'll try this one last time.

  Already at the hotel?

  They use certain hotels use of AP dozens of them.

  They also have a SSID to cover ALL rooms.

  You're on this thought rather than take my suggestions.

  Operating instructions AP

  use the same SSID on each band 2.4 xxx yyyy & 5G

  Use different channels 2.4 1.6 or 11 5 g 48 or 161

  Use the same level of safety on all

  Doing this for 5 years IT DOES NOT WORK.

• PS4 2 stay connected at the same time...

  Guys and girls, I'm begging for your help. I moved last year and bought the R7000 nighthawk and since then, my son and I have been unable to play the same game with our PS4. We play Battlefield 4 to be precise and every time now that we are trying to link to the top of one of us gets kicked and the error always says "interruption of the connection to the session. We never had this problem before. I did everything I can do with my limited skills irritable. Help, please.

  Wow, I fixed it after all this time. I deleted things forward port, I did months ago and I did the port forwarding for one of the ps4. Tested and BAM! Perfect! Thank you to all who responded.

• Extension of WiFi at R7000

  HI -.

  I recently installed a R7000 Nighthawk, but he needs a range extension to access certain parts of the House. The R7000 is rated AC1900. I think buying the EX6150 range extender, which is rated at AC1200. Is it still compatible with the R7000, but at a slower speed? I put off buying an AC1900 Extender because the price is 2 - 3 times an AC1200 unit.

  Thanks a lot for any advice.

  Peter

  Should work, and as you said, more slow - but 50 percent slower, due to the Extender of nature, they are penalized at about 50% loss of flow. I would suggest buying a router that can operate in Access Point, with connection mode direct etehrnet, back to your router, or seek to connect the router and the AP with powerline ethernet products.

• Nighthawk D7800 and BT Infinity 2

  My first time here so apologies for any errors of Protocol.

  I bought the Nighthawk to replace my BT Homehub 3 and a modem to connect to broadband Infinity 2 (fiber).

  I managed to connect to the internet via the BT modem so I know the system works. What I want to do is to connect the modem to the Nighthawk directly to the internet. I don't think that this can be done unless someone can tell me otherwise.

  I, the tongue in cheek, contacted BT and confirmed that they use a system of wiring on the telephone connection to connect to fiber (FTTC) via the copper to the home line, which is unique. The phone connector uses only the Center contacts both in the plug, connected to which wires I don't know, while the Nighthawk uses all four threads, it seems. BT does not use a filter on the line because it is built in the area of incoming phone line. So the Nighthawk can only connect directly from the VDSL Jack to the telephone line. The internet connection on the Nighthawk decision-making only connects to the BT modem.

  So, is it possible to connect to the fiber using the Nighthawks modem? I've conversed with support from Netgear and in their described wisdom and got sent - the manual method of Nighthawk, which I already explained did not have what I wanted. I'm still waiting for a further response from support, but not holding my breath.

  It seems that I bought a very expensive router!

  Michael,

  Popular sympathy.

  My Nighthawk played happily with internet provided that I have connected through my BT modem. The reason why I got the D7800 was because I wanted to use it a modem not BT proposing to connect to my fiber (sic, English).

  I don't think right now that Netgear has a modem that is able to connect to the infinite fiber BT service.

  I think I'll draw a line under this thread and concede defeat.

  Thank you