Connections RV042G Dual WAN

Similar Questions

• RV042G - access modem connected to a WAN port

  Hello

  I've set up my RV042G with that one line WAN currently using a modem Alice IAD to connect to my ISP. This unit has an own web server for configuration currently configured IP 192.168.0.1. The dual WAN router got the address of WAN IP 192.168.0.4 (the fixed address) and a LAN IP 192.168.0.5. Now, I need to access the modem from time to time for maintenance but can not reach address 192.168.0.1. The RV042G can be configured to allow communication between the modem and the LAN devices? I tried to put a static route, but that did not help. I'm certainly not a network expert.

  Thank you

  Mike

  Hi Mike, if your modem is able to log on locally, then the LAN RV042G subnet should be different from that of the modem LAN subnet. Given that your modem is 192.168.0.x your RV042G can be 192.168.1.x for LAN. So the RV042G WAN is 192.168.0.x.

  This should be your goal.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• lrt224 dual wan router

  Hi im new in dual wan configuration. Help, please.
  Here is my problem

  1 dynamic globe telecom primary WAN
  WAN static pldt 2 telecom
  Link failover mode

  1 router is connect to lrt224 to serve wifi and my switch also plugin for wifi wireless
  1 cctv dvr connected to port 9000 webport lrt224 9100 with auto detection parameters parameters

  Now:
  Sometimes cctv camera released to public ip address when the wan2 switch but sometimes cannot show also
  All around, with 1 wan dynamic as primary

  Hi @engkanto.net,.

  I agree with the suggestions. It is best to connect the IP camera to one of the LRT224 router's Ethernet ports. Then you must configure the Port Forwarding or Port Address Translation If you have more than one camera using the same internal port.

  Thank you.

• IPSEC VPN on the dual WAN links

  Here's my situation. I have two identical sites ASA 5505 and each has the dual wan/ISP connection and are set to resume using the sla monitor followed. I would like to create a vpn between these two sites that remains active regardless of what ISP link is online. Just make two crytpo card statements10 and a 20 inside each of the asa to each of the other ASA STATIC PUBLIC IP? It works or cause problems?

  Configuration of SITE B

  card crypto Cox_Primary_map 10 corresponds to the address Cox_Primary_cryptomap_10

  crypto Cox_Primary_map 10 peer 72.X.X.X card game<== primary="" static="" isp="" at="" site="">

  10 Cox_Primary_map transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game

  card crypto Qwest_Backup_map 20 corresponds to the address Qwest_Backup_cryptomap_20

  crypto Qwest_Backup_map 20 peer 98.X.X.X card game<== backup="" static="" isp="" at="" site="">

  Qwest_Backup_map 20 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game

  tunnel-group 72.X.X.X type ipsec-l2l

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 72.X.X.X

  pre-shared-key adadsfasdf

  tunnel-group 98.X.X.X type ipsec-l2l
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 98.X.X.X

  pre-shared-key adadsfasdf

  Thank you

  Jesse,

  One of the solutions to your problem is to apply the same for both interfaces crypto card and have the two counterparts mentioned under a crypto map entry.

  Since you're using track/IP SLA to activate a single link to a single IP address of time will be answers.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/command/reference/C5.html#wp2278871

  Have several inputs card crypto with the same statement in game will cause problems.

  Hope that makes sense.

  Marcin

• RV082, Dual Wan, VPN + protocol bindings

  Hi all

  I have this kind of Setup and I can't figure out how to think this router.

  My Installer uses Dual Wan load balancing mode. I only need one VPN tunnel. High availability is my concern.

  Site 1 has fiber and Cable

  Site 2A cable and FTTN

  Each ISP provides a static IP

  VPN works very well in the event of failure. I am always disappointed that it works in the case where a single primary WAN breaks, but is not operational if primary WAN on Site 1 stops at the same time secondary Site WAN 2 stops. It is very rare but can happen.

  In any case, my problems are where I need binding protocol to ensure secure WEB (https, banking, portal provider) sessions.

  I bind, at the least, port 443 to my primary WAN. In this way, I can access the Web sites and keep me logged.

  So, if I browse a HTTPS across the VPN server, binding protocol always attempts to pass port 443 by the WAN1. He will not even consider the VPN as a valid route first.

  (Maybe) can problem I reduce Hop Count for Site 2 less than 35?     P.S. I replaced the addresses I don't think they are relevant.

  Destination IP Subnet mask Default gateway Number of hops Interface

  ADDR network WAN2 255.255.255.252 * 0 eth2 WAN1 network addr 255.255.255.248 * 0 eth1 Site 2 255.255.255.0 Site 1 fiber Gateway 35 eth1 Site 1 255.255.255.0 * 0 eth0 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 fiber WAN1 15 eth1 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 cable WAN2 40 eth2 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 fiber WAN1 40 eth1

  Thank you all,

  Bruno

  I would like to conclude this is a bug and requires further investigation. I wouldn't call it a limitation if it was my decision (not that I have so much importance in this regard)

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Dual WAN router and protocol binding

  Hello! I'm trying to find a dual WAN router with support VPN, which allow me to redirect part of the traffic to a specific port WAN and balancing of this specific traffic in the case of this WAN failure (the latter is preferred but is not entirely necessary) load.

  RV042/G could help me with this? In this case, allow redirection Protocol only? What port/ip forwarding? Or some sort of filtering of packets to redirect to specific WAN ports?

  Maybe I need another router in the conduct of business?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi Jose, RV0XX model (g) supports a protocol source LAN link to extended network destination set. It can be a host of high-end LAN or a single host LAN. It may be the customer service or all services. In the case of a failure of network SCOPE, all links in the Protocol are "ignored" and switch to the active WAN until normal operation is restored.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Tunnel VPN RV-042 for Dual WAN Failover backup function

  We have customers with dual WAN failover scenarios with site-to-site VPN tunnels.

  In the past, the VPN tunnel backup feature has been available in the RV-082.

  One of the new RV-042 firmware versions have the function of backup Tunnel VPN available?

  The feature is supported on the RV042 V3 hardware.

• RV016 - Dual WAN &amp; Secure connection problem

  I have settings wrong my RV016 upward to allow connections secured on our server. I have searched the forums and read a lot of posts and it seems that the protocol binding is the answer, but I can't make it work.

  We have a static double-WAN with 5 IPs configuration on our slow connection (a cable modem, 1 WAN) and a dynamic IP address on our fast (FIOS, 2 WAN). I use special NAT to send all incoming traffic on a static (on WAN 1) to static IP internal IP of our server. We use intelligent load balancing and (by a message I read) I turned off the detection of Network Service on the two networks.

  When I try to SSH from outside the server, I get through: I get a password and, if I get the wrong password I'm re - you are prompted for the password. But when I enter the password of the connection hangs. When I unplug WAN 2 I can connect on SSH without problem.

  I tried implementing binding protocol as follows: I created a service for SSH (TCP/22 ~ 22) and added to WAN 1. I remembered to turn it on. I played with a different IP address ranges, but nothing works (it is where I am a little out of my League). Here is what I tried:

  • Internal IP of the server at all: 10.10.10.10 ~ 10.10.10.10(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)
  • internal subnet at all: 10.10.10.2 ~ 10.10.10.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)

  In a lot of posts I read that binding protocol has solved bad people to a connection secure. What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  Alex

  Hi Alex, I think one thing that you should really consider is the DMZ to see if it localized to a problem of double-WAN or not. If the problem follows with two WAN upward in the DMZ, I agree there is something which perhaps does not properly.

  Another argument may be, if you are the type of thinking somehow that load balancing is messing things up, link ALL SERVICE for the server to a specific WAN, don't let not limited just a port. That can also give an idea, especially if the server works as expected.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Dual Wan router inaccessible RV042G after the configuration management of bandwidth

  Hello

  I bought a router of RV042G a few days ago to manage 2 lines adsl at my home. Everything works fine except for one thing: I can't configure bandwidth management. When I go into the menu "Bandwidth management", "Type of bandwidth management" then I choose the frequency control or priority and I have a had a few rules to prioritize the http protocol, for example, then I click the button Save. After a few seconds of internet use I loss the router and internet connectivity and 192.168.1.1 became inaccessible Ping. I had to unplung the power cord to restart the router, the same problem persists until I have remove all the rules! A few times I even had to do a factory reset because my adsl modem is inaccessible behind the router (impossible to do a ping to the gateway).

  What can I do? There is a known issue on this router and firmware? I have:

  Serial number:		NKS16220141	Firmware version:	v4.2.1.02 (January 18, 2012 14:10:55)
  VID PID:		RV042G V01	The firmware MD5 checksum:	a9817f2dbdcbd6a5c109eaa21b1c3545
  LAN			Working mode:	Entry door

  Thanks for your help.

  Could Pascal you please make a backup configuration file.

  Then I would you at the factory to reset the router then once he comes back to the top, login, make your internet work and try the management of bandwidth again without any other configuration. See if it has the same problem.

  If not then this would imply some there is a configuration in conflict with the previous establishment or a software defect that has been corrected through the reset.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• ICS via connection PPPOE Miniport Wan via Microsoft Virtual WiFi miniport card

  Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. Pavilion 1201tx g6.

  I recently changed my ISP and it me connected via Dial-Up (WAN Miniport PPPOE) connection.

  My current network configuration is shown below:

  

  Problem is that now I can not share my Internet to my Android.
  Before, when I had just the active LAN connection, I could do it easily. But recent changes allow me to share internet.

  I use Virtual Router and sometimes I use guest also. He started not even when I ran the commands in cmd. And I am the admin of my laptop.

  Need serious help please.

  
  ____________________________
  | Please hit Kudos, if I help you! |
  | |
  | WILL |
  |___________________________|

  In fact I already found solution myself. I used it every day.
  
  I need not create VPN. Normal ICS works well.
  
  I start Virtual Router as soon as I have the dian PPPoE connection and it works!

• ISA570 Weighted Dual Wan &amp; Failover

  So, we had a few problems here while we were both WITH link failover detection two ISPs for balancing.  Our problems seemed if go away once we have disabled the link failover.  What is happening is a wan link out randomly, it was not a particular wan link.  We could have one out one day and another on another day. I thought I would post to see if anyone knows or had problems with doing a 50-50 balanced weighted load scenario with the failover link light.  Now, with the recovery of disabled link, it seems that if a wan link goes down, computers are always sent on this bad wan link.

  I did a combination of the two in deployments. Most of them is connections of failover with low cost connection primary and secondary connections of 4 G of type variable cost. I have not had any problems with load balancing and failover work together, but I can not also think all instances where he arrived so I can't be certain that he would not fail. ;-) If please try DNS and let me know if you experience the same results. If If, I would open a TAC case if Cisco can try to locate the bug, assuming that there is one at this time. Please keep me dated with your results. Thank you.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Connection to the Wan to LAN RV320 1 individual

  Hello

  I have a cisco RV320, I use 2 wan with different ISP connections.

  It is possible to come out with an ISP to one of the 4 LAN ports?

  I need a specific LAN port for internet connection comes from a specific or 2 wan1 wan, and other lan ports to use load balancing feature.

  Is it possible?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Thank you for the information.

  After reviewing the chart, it seems that what you need is to create links of Protocol 2, on Router 2 and the other on the first router so that traffic can be directed out of the ISP on the right.

  Unfortunately, this is not supported as the routers were not intended to work like this, so there is no way to guarantee that traffic on the second router will come out of the ISP on the right on the first but you can try.

  Please let me know if it worked.

• RV82 Dual WAN and online banking. Packages of two IP addresses

  Hi all

  I have a set RV082 in place with two different ISPS (load balancing). Some time ago, users began to experience problems with online banking. It seems that the banking system set up more than a 'channel' to/from the end user and that bank systems won't accept that the packets come from 2 different public IP. I solved this by linking all HTTPS traffic to WAN1.

  Is this a good solution or is there a better way to deal with this? I'm afraid that it will be 'imbalance' my network as many services like Netflix and Youtube is HTTPS.

  Are there other services online that may have problems with a configuration of load balancing?

  If WAN1 breaks down. WAN2 will start HTTPS transport even if HTTPS is related to WAN1?

  I also have a similar problem with the router alert (goes to wrong ISP each time second), but this seems to be fixed in the latest firmware:
  "Authentication of email account is configurable for email alert".

  Thanks in advance

  Jone

  Hello James,

  Your solution is correct.  Certain types of secure connection HTTPS or SSH will not work if you keep changing IP address source, because it breaks the three-way handshake.  To avoid that you binding memorandum of installation you have.  You can do the same for all other traffic must always go out to a certain port WAN.

  If the WAN connection selected for protocol links to crashes, he switched to the other WAN until the connection retrieves.

  I have not seen too many online services that have problems with the load balancing is especially with secure connections, namely HTTPS.  I tried to access the HTTPS, Netflix, but I could never get an encrypted connection, but your best bet is to monitor and observe the network to see how it affects you.

  I mean the line you are citing has to do with the configuration of authentication to an SMTP server to send alerts by e-mail, rather than choose a port WAN to use, however if you protocol links SMTP to the WAN you would use that should no longer be a problem.

  Hope that helps,

  Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• RV320 / 325 Dual WAN Question

  I am trying to configure these routers to essentially take the voice traffic and have it use one of the two WAN connections as it is the main and any other traffic use the other connection. I would like it so that if a connection doesn't they also switch between them.  I can find a way to separate the traffic but can't seem to find a way to redo the failure as well... Is this possible with one of these routers?

  Thank you

  Stem

  Hi Rod,

  The Administrator's guide is a bit unclear on this subject, so I install a RV320 here in my lab just to confirm.

  Whenever you setup, if the Wan, it is bound to a binding protocol disconnects connections are switched to automotically for WAN replacement and the rear switch when the correct WAN rises again.

  So you should be able to configure the two WAN, then highlight the load balance with appropriate traffic related to what WAN you want to use, and they are toggled if/when one of the WAN drops.

  Let me know if you need more information,

  Christopher Ebert

  ---

  Senior Network Support Engineer - Cisco Small Business Support Center

• Loser connecting on Wrvs4400n WAN

  WAN internet connection on my Wrvs4400n router about two times a day. I can't understand what is the cause. I reboot the router and I get internet. I called Cisco support and the technology was useful once bcause I'm no longer in warranty. He had me change the DNS addresses that I have of my ISP 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 public DNS. Allowed internet again, when he had left, but after a while the connection cuts once again. It seems that it leaves around 13:00 every day. But after the loss of 13:00 and restarting today the connection of smoking again around 14:30.

  I turned on the newspapers and I'm getting a lot of the following msg -"eth0: packet received with own address as source address" and "remove<00:13:CC:88:FF:AA> from the ARL table" - and "packetresponse was small." Ignoring the response of the (dns address) and - unexpected server: (DNS address) . -

  Any help will be appreciated.

  I have disable IPS.

  Tom Wallin

  He stops to prevent any interference with that active.  If there's a way might capture you packets and see what kind of activity is to be captured so that we could get a better idea of what is happening.  But Yes if this is allowed if it detects any anomalies to close the wan.