Interactive report - filtering with the "IN" operator

Similar Questions

• Using elements of the application of interactive report filters

  Hello
  
  Can we use elements of application in interactive report filters? If so, how?
  
  Thank you
  Machaan

  Take a look at the creation of a link to the section of interactive reports in the Application Guide of the user for example generator

  This example binds, resets and clears the saved report parameters 12345. It also creates an ENAME = 'KING' filter on saved report 12345.

  f? p = 100: 1: & SESSION. : I have R_REPORT_12345::RIR, CIR::RIR, CIR:IR_ENAME:KING

  If you have an element of the application P1_ENAME the following apply to the example above

  f? p = 100: 1: & SESSION. : I have R_REPORT_12345::RIR, CIR::RIR, CIR:IR_ENAME: & P1_ENAME.

  If you want a permament for all filter saved reports on the value of point of application, it is best to use the: APP_ITEM_NAME bind variables in your SQL syntax, it really depends on how you define the value of your item and how you interact with it. AFAIK does not request point directly bind variables syntax in the filters, IR etc...

• Serial number after the interactive report filtering

  Hello

  I have an interactive report. In the report, I have column named serial number which is generated using "row_number over (order by id). When I filter certain data of the serial number is the line number sequence, but I want to put the sequence based on number after filtering like when name rownum-100-samia, after the filter by samia serial number must be 1. Is this possible? I'm sorry if I can not write properly!

  Hello Samia

  Have you seen the next thread? Maybe it can help you work.

  Indicates the number of Clotilde in an interactive report

• Run interactive report only if the search filter values / entered.

  Hello

  I have an interactive report I want to post, but the problem is that too many files are in the base table, so I want to hide this report until some filter values are entered in the search field (apexir_SEARCH), so if no value entered search I do not show the report but with the search value view the report with the returned records ,

  
  

  I tried to create a hidden item (P1_TEST) USE THE CONDITION relating to THE report if P1_TEST IS NOT NULL, and then submit the report, but it does not work well enough

  
  

  Thank you

  Gor_Mahia wrote:

  I have an interactive report I want to post, but the problem is that too many files are in the base table, so I want to hide this report until some filter values are entered in the search field (apexir_SEARCH), so if no value entered search I do not show the report, but with the value of research showing the report with the returned records ,

  I tried to create a hidden item (P1_TEST) USE THE CONDITION relating to THE report if P1_TEST IS NOT NULL, and then submit the report, but it does not work well enough

  Add to the WHERE clause of the query of the IR (or add it in the WHERE clause if the report has not one):

  and exists (select
                  null
              from
                  apex_application_page_ir ir
                    join apex_application_page_ir_rpt irr
                      on ir.interactive_report_id = irr.interactive_report_id
                    join apex_application_page_ir_cond irc
                      on irc.report_id = irr.report_id
              where
                  ir.application_id = to_number(:app_id)
              and ir.page_id = to_number(:app_page_id)
              and ir.region_name = 'Conditional IR'
              and irc.condition_type in ('Filter', 'Search')
              and irr.session_id = :app_session
              and irr.base_report_id = (select apex_ir.get_last_viewed_report_id(to_number(:app_page_id), ir.region_id) from dual))
  

  The predicate will be true only if the user has created at least a filter/search condition for the report, and if it is false, that it must stop the optimizer to hit the base table. (This has been developed and tested on APEX 5.0, so there may be differences with previous versions.)

  Note that using the search field by default generates inefficient queries. If you are really serious about performance, clear the search field and get users to create filters to specific columns, which will have a better chance to allow the optimizer to use indexes or improve the execution plan.

• link to an interactive report AND apply the filter for 2 items.

  Hi can you help me out here on how to create a link to an interactive report AND apply the filter for 2 items.

  Here is my code

  I have a list of table, clicking the selected item should link to interactive report and create the filter. Below the code does not work for a filter. can you help me what to do with 2 filters.

  A filter = > works very well

  sys. HTP.p ("< ul class =" uChartList"> ');

  sys. HTP.p ("< class li =" uNumber uGrid col_2 col_sart"> ');

  sys. HTP.p ("< a href =" "|") sys. HTF.escape_sc ('f? p ='|: APP_ID |': 0 0 :'||: APP_SESSION |':00:P00_XXX:000, RIR:IREQ_XXX:Test :') |) » » >') ;

  sys. HTP.p ("< class =" uValue"> ' | l_tester |) ("< / big >");

  sys. HTP.p ("< small class =" uLabel"> < /small > Tester ');

  sys. HTP.p ("< /a > '");

  sys. HTP.p ("< /li >" ");

  Scenario 2:

  Two filters = > does not

  sys. HTP.p ("< ul class =" uChartList"> ');

  sys. HTP.p ("< class li =" uNumber uGrid col_2 col_sart"> ');

  sys. HTP.p ("< a href =" "|") sys. HTF.escape_sc ('f? p ='|: APP_ID |': 0 0 :'||: APP_SESSION |':00:P00_XXX:000, RIR:IREQ_XXX:Test:P00_YYY:001:IRC_YYY:test2 :') |) » » >') ;

  sys. HTP.p ("< class =" uValue"> ' | l_tester |) ("< / big >");

  sys. HTP.p ("< small class =" uLabel"> < /small > Tester ');

  sys. HTP.p ("< /a > '");

  sys. HTP.p ("< /li >" ");

  Thanks in advance

  actually the syntax wrong values in the syntax of the passes to several elements.

  is

  f? p = 6000:6004: & APP_SESSION. : NO:6003:MY_ITEM1, MY_ITEM2, MY_ITEM3:1234, 5678

  Use above scenario and verification.

  Go

• Hide filter interactive report dynamically after the page load

  Hello
  
  I try to hide the section of interactive report filters (hide/show the area with +/-sign on the top of the report) the loading of the page
  
  I have the reference to the thread after http://apex-at-work.blogspot.com/2011/02/hide-interactive-report-filter.html posted by Tobias Arnhold...
  
  According to the expert, all I have to do is post the following code the code JS "page loading" within a dynamic action...
  
  
  / * Hide filter IRR after page load * /.
  If ($('#apexir_CONTROLS_IMAGE').attr ("src") == ' / i/minus.gif ') {}
  gReport.toggle_controls ($x ('apexir_CONTROL_PANEL_CONTROL'));
  }
  
  I did, but apparently it does not work for me...
  
  I posted a sample on APEX. Oracle.com for review and comment
  
  Thank you
  
  Edited by: qwe12654 may 3, 2011 19:15

  Hello

  01. in the report Footer region put this

  * This will hide your filters, highlight conditions

  02. then Goto 'Report attributes' => 'Search Bar' => for 'Include search bar' select 'no '.
  * This will hide the full search bar (do this only if you want to hide this part)

  * If you get the answer then mark as 'Correct '.

• Interactive reports will change the order of columns

  Hi all
  
  Have experienced this for the 3rd time now. The other times I just create a new report with the request in the order you wish to fix. But it starts to become annoying now...
  
  When I use the arrows to change the column order on my reports interactive nothing happens when running. The new order is saved and appears that way in design mode, but does not change the order on the report.
  
  Please let me know if you know how to solve this problem, or if Miss me just something really obvious.
  
  Thank you!
  K

  Hey,.

  Changing the order in the attributes report is more an effect, since the default report parameters overwrite it.

  If you want to change the order of the columns, you must go through the menu actions of the interactive report, then choose the column selection menu item, change the order and press ok.

  Then save this order order by default, you go to the action menu again and choose save report option this time, select "primary" or "Save as default" depending on your version of apex (this option is available only if you are connected as a developer in the generator of the apex). Then press the ok button again.

  Other users will only see the changes if they press the reset button on their version of empathy.

  I hope this helps.

• Hello, please tell me, if iphone purchased at the Canada without a contract with the mobile operator, it will be subject to safeguards in Russia

  Hello, please tell me, if iphone purchased at the Canada without a contract with the mobile operator, it will be subject to safeguards in Russia

  You have the latest version of iOS installed and if you use not updated the software on the phone (jailbreak), the phone can't be hacked.

  Unauthorized modification of the iOS can cause security vulnerabilities, instability, reduced and another independence from...

• Filter Table ADF | with the Like operator

  Dear all,

  I use JDeveloper 12 c.

  I have an obligation to provide the filter on the table with the 'Like' operator

  I'm following Ashish Awasti method on it. Ashish Awasthi (Jdev/ADF) Blog: filter on af:table column programmatically, Invoke 'FilterableQueryDescriptor' t...

  All very well here. In "FilterableQueryDescriptor" default search operator is "begins by". Is it possible to change the operator "starts by ' to 'Like' operator.

  Please suggest.

  Thank you

  Vieira

  An addition: If the op just wants to use the like operator, it must use the data of the field in the table, as is. View implizite criteria build for filter uses

  (((Countries.COUNTRY_NAME COMME (: bindName ||))) (('%')) OR (: bindName IS NULL)))

  for the startswith operator.  Yes ther EI '%' added automatically. It should be replaced by

  (((Countries.COUNTRY_NAME COMME (: bindName)) OR (: bindName IS NULL)))

  to be a true sql 'like' operator. Then, the user must enter the filter with the '%' residue criteria to perform a generic search.

  Adding a '%' before the setting is counterproductive because it can be a bottleneck. The PB needs to do a full table scan to get the result!

  Then it would not behave as the sql like operator that you can search for '? URO % "for"europa". If, for example, a line with "western europe" is your setting ' %? % ships ' grab this line too.

  Timo

• Hello. You will need to update Mac OS El Capitan. Currently have v.8 CS Photoshop and Lightroom 2 v.2.4. In order just to work with the new operating system, please inform for updating both.

  Currently have v.8 CS Photoshop and Lightroom 2 v.2.4. In order just to work with the new operating system, please inform for updating both.

  Hi R0w1% 40nd,

  Adobe Photoshop CS v.8 and Lightroom 2 v.2.4. are very old software and the operating system you are using is the most recent, so there may be compatibility issues that adobe has not tested these applications on newer operating systems.

  The installer for Adobe Photoshop CS v.8 and Lightroom 2 v.2.4. are no longer available.

  You can see the creative Cloud, creative cloud and rates membership plans | Adobe Creative Cloud

• CReative cloeud works with the linux operating system?

  CReative cloeud works with the linux operating system?

  Adobe Creative Cloud

  Hello

  Unfortunately, the product Adobe Creative cloud does not work under LINUX. Please access the link as follows for the system requirements for Adobe Creative Cloud products.

  System requirements | Adobe Creative Cloud

  Thank you.

• Photoshop CS 5.1 is compatible with the new operating system of El Capitan?

  Photoshop CS 5.1 is compatible with the new operating system of El Capitan?

  Ron, Photoshop CS5.1 should work with MAC El Capitan.

  Also, please see the following link: made CS5 Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign works after upgrade Mac to El Captian?

• Interactive report performance with conditional link

  Apex 3.2

  I have an interactive report.

  The underlying sql return 127000 lines

  The sql is

  Select

  LDE.ods_system,

  LDE.ldekey,

  Msg.sendersystem,

  Msg. MessageType,

  Msg. MessageVersion,

  Msg.msgseqnumber,

  Msg. AlternateKey,

  Msg.crudmarker,

  Msg.clrbookdate,

  Msg.clrbookresult,

  lower ('udf_' | MSG button.) MessageType),

  LDE.ldekey |'. ' | Msg. AlternateKey |'. ' | Msg.msgseqnumber udm_key

  Of

  clr_esbmessageheader msg,

  clr_adm_systemmessage SMA,

  lde udm_lde

  where

  ADM.ldeid = lde.ldeid and

  Msg.sendersystem = adm.system and

  Msg. MessageType = adm.messagetype and

  Msg. MessageVersion = adm.messageversion and

  Msg.receiversystem = "SCIPS.

  msg.clrbookdate desc order

  This report takes a second to display.

  I need to add a conditional link to another page, so I used

  case

  When lower ('udf_' | msg.) MessageType) = "udf_distreceipt" then

  "' < a class ="type"href =" "|" apex_util.prepare_url ('f? p ='|: APP_ID |) » : 52 :'|| : APP_SESSION |': ' | : D EBUG |': RIR' | ': I R_MSG_KEY, P52_PG :'|| LDE.ldekey |'. ' | Msg. AlternateKey |'. ' || Msg.msgseqnumber | «, » || 50, null, 'SESSION') | «"title ="Go α report udf_distreceipt"> udf_distreceipt < /a > '»»

  Another 'no link' don't end table_link

  The sql seems to be ok, because the report was accepted, but by selecting the new column and save the report back for always (2 min)

  Now, the report takes more than 2 minutes to run and I still need to add more conditions.

  I coded the link incorrectly?

  Gus

  Well either force them to filter everything first or actually withdraw the appeal prepare_url of your sql. Can you not just use the link of apex column feature? All your links seem to differ in is in the display text for the anchor and not the actual url. If your link is perhaps not as accurate, but at least going to session state protection and be fast and everything will be pretty standard. You could delete SSP of course, but who are better than a more generic link text? The call is of course to you.

• To reference the lines of interactive report filtered in PL/SQL

  Hi all
  I use an interactive report on a page. I want a process page to reference the filtered rows dynamically by an end user. The report to be referenced is not recorded but simply filtered in the main report.
  
  How to reference lines filtered in pl/sql. I searched through the forum and that you can't find a concise answer.
  
  BR,
  
  Ben.

  Hi Jari

  I think that's what I saw last time this came to the top: http://www.apexninjas.com/Checkboxes_in_Interactive_Reports.pdf

• Interact with the guest operating system without providing a password of the host

  Whenever I try to use the copy-VMGuestFile or Invoke-VMScript I'm prompted for a name of username/password for the host, I am already connected to vCenter Server I should not need to provide a name of user and password for the host? As many users in vCenter Server accounts do not exist on the host and would need to be configured individually for each host?

  AFAIK not with the current construction of PowerCLI.

  But if I remember correctly it intends to simplify this in a future generation.

  Maybe can someone of VMW confirm?

  ____________

  Blog: LucD notes

  Twitter: lucd22