IOM approval process

Similar Questions

• No emails sent by the IOM approval process

  Hello

  We have a problem with the mail notifications sent from the element of human task of a BPEL workflow approval in OIM 11 g R2 (SOA 11 g R1):

  On one of our circles of IOM, no approval notification is sent at all, even if they are correctly configured in the element of human task corresponds to the composite SOA. Notifications are sent correctly on another installation of the IOM that uses exactly the same composite.

  There is no trace of the IOM and SOA even try to send these messages, that they appear at all in the "State of the Message page" of the section of the mail Service of the Enterprise Manager user (not even in a "failed" State).

  We already checked:

  • AdminServer, SOAServer, OIMServer and area newspapers (they show no unusual)
  • The composites themselves (identical on both facilities)
  • The configuration of email from UMS driver (identical on both facilities)
  • The JpsContextName in the SDPMessagingServerConfig MBean and jps-config. XML (identical on both facilities)

  What are we missing that could be the cause of this problem?

  Thank you very much!

  Configure you the messaging part and turn notifications on the server SOA?

  In enterprise manager, right-click of your soa server instance, under Administration of SOA, select properties of Notification Workflow.  From there set the Notification Mode and the emails below.

  -Kevin

• Error in the approval process

  Hi all
  
  I am a new bie to OIM 11 g. I developed a custom (single level parallel) composite approval and it works very well.
  According to my new condition, I need to add two blocks of approval set before the parallel approval block. Throughout the approval process contains 3 levels of approval with the third level as a parallel approval block.
  
  Level 1 approval will be a default approval and by default, all requests must be routed to this level.
  Based on a condition (create/edit/delete user), the request must be routed to the 2nd and 3rd level approval.
  
  In one scenario (condition), requests are routed to 1st, 2nd, 3rd level. In another scenario, requests are routed to approval level 1st and 3rd. In the two scenarios above, the request is completed successfully.
  
  In the last scenario (where lack of condition for the 2nd and 3rd level) the request is only forwarded the approval level 1 and not the other two levels. In this scenario, I get the following error, and demand is a failure.
  
  WLSPropertyUtils:getOperationName, the operation name is null
  Invalid result COMPLETED received the SOA for the id of the request 3058.
  [CALLBACKMSG] Plugin to change internal State for request 3058 and the status is: query failed.
  [CALLBACKMSG] Inside the plugin for adjustment of status to request 3058, target tye is resource and the operation is MODIFYRESOURCE.
  [CALLBACKMSG] Inside the plugin for adjustment of status to request 3058, target tye is resource and the operation is MODIFYRESOURCE.
  An attempt was made to search for unversioned
  resources global 'tail' of a version of the application "IOM [Version 11.1.1.3.0 =] '. This can potentially lead to conflict the uses of the global resource between multiple versions of the application.
  WLSPropertyUtils:getOperationName, the operation name is null
  
  Let me know if I am wrong anywhere or please suggest what to do to solve this problem.
  
  Thanks in advance for the help.
  
  Thank you
  PT

  Below you will find the link
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/request.htm#BABJGIFJ
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/request.htm#BABFIAIH

  check the mapping of "task results is REJECTING" and "results of the task is APPROVED.

• Object is not be displayed during the approval process

  Hello
  
  The purpose of my custom connector shape is not get displayed in the IOM 10 g approval process. We have upgraded to patch BP19. Previously, Im doubting if it occurred after the upgradation of patch and work... Can anyone please share your suggestions?
  
  Thank you

  Try below

  1. Please provide all permissions as insert, update and delete for role in object permissions (hopefully you did)
  2. just to check Add your role or all USERS tab

  3. check in the resource object 'itself demand allowed'

  Kind regards
  Nayan

• Policies for approval 11g IOM - approval rule to check the Connection Manager

  Hello
  
  I have a requirement in which if the applicant of a resource is a Manager, while demand should automatically be approved. However if the applicant is one person other than the owner, then it should be assigned to the Manager for approval. Is it possible to do this verification in the approval rule?
  
  My idea was to create two trust policies for the same resource with a single policy with auto approve activated if the connection applicant is same as connection of eating of the beneficiary and other policies with the default approval process BeneficiaryManager if the connection of the applicant is different from the connection of the beneficiary. I don't know if the approval rule can be configured to check these values during execution.
  
  Any kind of help/suggestion is greatly appreciated.
  
  Concerning
  Deepa

  To do this, you change the task of bpel and specify the condition to jump for the task. In the rule to jump, you must specify if the applicant is responsible for the user (the two values that you get in the payload). Set it up this way auto approve request to the Manager.
  Also be sure to affect the outcome of the BPEL task of condition of approval so that IOM does not wait for the State.

  HTH,
  BB

  Published by: bbagaria on Sep 9, 2011 05:36

• Q: integrate the approval process

  Hi all
  
  I'm looking for some information with an approval process for a resource regarding.
  
  I m having resources, called 'X '. I want to integrate an approval process when users are created through manual processes and for the same resource users should get created automatically via GTC flat file.
  
  
  Please guide me on how to make this implementation.
  
  
  Kind regards
  877247

  Access policy: used for the supply of users in the target Application when they enter the IOM after reconciliation.

  You can create two cgroups employee and contractor
  Create the rule of membership for both of these groups as role is used and role == contractor

  Create two access with and without the approval policies and attach it to the corresponding group.

  Second case:

  Create an approval workflow
  Add a task (UNCONDITIONAL), connect your adapter that will check the type of user as employee or Contrcator and decide whether or not you need approval.
  This task will return answers "NEED_APPROVAL" and "APPROVAL_NOTREQUIRED".

  On NEED_APPROVAL, call your other task which will be simultaneously assign a group
  On APPROVAL_NOT_REQUIRED does not call something.

• IOM approval workflow

  Hi all
  I try to call a custom adapter when a user changes their profile (for example, the first name) of the IOM.
  
  I changed the process of 'user profile Edit"- does"pending approval given"process not conditional, to configure the workflow approval task. Now, whenever a user changes their profile, the request goes to xelsysadm for approval and once approved by xelsysadm, the profile is updated.
  Also, I have traced task of my custom in the USR_PROCESS_TRIGGERS adapter process so that whenever the name is updated, my task of process is called.
  
  Now, EVERYHING works as you want, but I'm not able to get information from the author of the request of my custom adapter. Please let me know how I can extract the information from the requestee.
  
  Thank you

  Create a task in process of definition of profile edit approval process and call on the success response of the task in process "pending approval Data.

  In your case, its does not work as information of the applicant for approval in not available when your field updated task is trigger for research process_triggers.

  HTH

• IOM - approval

  Hello
  I'm trying to configure approval level 1 in IOM processes so that whenever a user triggers a request for application (RO), he goes to his manager for approval. Once it is approved by his manager, he should get placed in service in the target application. To do this, I did the following:
  
  1. added tcCompleteTask adaptor in the Standard approval process
  2 created New process as "Manager approval" giving the type as the name of the approval and the object as my RO
  3. adding a task as "Manager approval" and specified "Manager of the target user's request" tab of the assignment under the default rule
  
  Now whenever the user raises a demand for this RO, it passes to the user himself and gets approved. Please let me know if I'm missing something.
  
  Thank you

  Be sure to mark the task as unconditional and it works every time that the application is submitted. Even if the user submitting the query was the Manager, he would go to the Manager ever.

  -Kevin

• Send Emial - approval process

  Hello
  
  I have a two IOM groups say group "Admin" and the group "group Emp. The "Admin" group is defined as the management of the 'group of Emp' group.
  
  I have an approval process, then I defined the call of the process task "Admin Group Approval". Using the assignment of this task 'Admin Group Approval' tab, the request is assigned to the "Admin" group (I used the adapter to task assignment to determine the group, 'Admin Group'.).
  
  I want to send the e-mail to the assignee (in this case, the members of the group "Admin") so I set the email and set it above the allocation rule and checked the box "Send E-mail" as well.
  
  The approval process works fire but the problem is, the mail is sent only to the administrator, but members of the group "Admin" not getting any emails.
  
  Can someone help me on this?
  
  HERE
  thirlk

  Uncheck send it an email to the task and send e-mails to the task assignment adapter itself (where you return the key to group) using tcEmailNotificationUtil API

• Dangerous change in the approval process for iBooks

  you remember long time for approval of new iBooks users author books that publish their books on the iBook Store since the beginning. Originally, it was WEEKS, sometimes even months to get through the approval process. Fortunately, which improved considerably over time and now it's down to a period of 24 hours. remove your book from the store.

  I have published more than 17 books so far since the beginning of the iBook Store, and certainly, I look forward to this improvement. However, I just found out the hard way that this improvement comes with a terrible price.

  The new procedure:

  Is the approval process faster (not only) not due to more staff to go through the comments. Instead, it is due to an approval procedure has changed as it has been explained to me by the customer support. Now, the examiner spends less time going through the books to get quickly to the store. I don't know the details, but I guess they check the side more art if works and not actually reading it Word by Word.

  With this first less carefully past obviously comes a new stage. The Department for approval now takes books later (perhaps if they have more time or something) and check for any errors and delivers a ticket while your book is already on the iBook Store. In fact, at that time, that is not on the iBook Store more and this is the great potential disaster you should be aware of. If you get a ticket issued, your book get ripped the store until you propose changes and he crossed successfully a new review process, which could take days. It's wrong, really wrong, and he just happened to two of my books.

  Out of the blue, I got a ticket of the iBooks team for my book 'Logic Pro X - how it works', which lies on the line store since 2013 has been updated (and approved) last September. On one page, I had misspelled the name of "iBook" Store instead of "iBooks Store" and on another page, I got a link to the page of my book by asking readers to write a comment Amazon if they like my book. Of course, it was also a no-no (a multi-billionaire company referring to a competitor of billions of dollars with a link).

  I made the changes immediately and has the new version uploaded in an hour. But the review process took over 2 days, after I contacted support and recovery from the case. And here's the reason:

  At the moment they have issued the ticket, my book was not available on the iBook Store more, nothing, not even a mention that it is "temporarily unavailable" like Amazon. The visitors couldn't find the book, all the links from my Web site, twitter, facebook and other sites related, everything was made immediately a dead link. Not only did I lose money, I had to deal with customer e-mails explaining why they could not find the announced book. Last week, it happened with another book when I was in town for a week and had no files with me. And even once, it took 3 days to review the correction that I added 's' to the iBook Store.

  It is mind-boggling that the Team did iBook ' t think that through

  Why not keep the booking online during the update

  Why not give priority to the presentation (check two typos took longer than the initial review of the book).

  I asked the support team to issue feedback on this subject, so they can correct this procedure. In the meantime, you better watch for potential new tickets, or someone had the same problem already?

  HI Edgar,

  It's really good to know. Thank you

  Difficult to have a work around for this.

  (Got a ticket) Right now, I'm waiting for approval,

  After correcting a few minor problems.

  I hope this will get fixed soon.

  I like your idea to keep the original "approved."

  live version, until the update is approved.

  Should be a simple and logical

  changes to the procedure.

  Kind regards... Thomas

• Versions app playBook and approval process problem.

  Hello

  my app (http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/32722?lang=en) has been approved and submitted to App World March 22, version 1.1.
  After this new 0.9.4 SDK came out with permissions function.
  My application uses the file system, so I simply complied with this new SDK and added to the review (version 1.2).
  But right now it's still under discussion with the status "waiting for Test House"(plus d'un mois déjà). "»
  PlayBook users now download app v1.1 of App World and it turns out that the app does not work on devices, because of the old SDK.
  So, should I remove my App World app or just wait for the approval of the v1.2?

  Hi bvb_infinity,

  If the application does not work, it may be a good idea to take it down while the new version is in the approval process, but more than a month waiting on a new version is not normal.

  I checked the State of it and push it along.  It will take a few hours to be propagated in the App World, but in the next day or users should start to download 1.2 or get update notifications (if they download 1.1).

• Approval process playBook (Initial submittal vs) tracking of versions

  If it was weird.  I had downloaded v1.0.0 of a game of mine in the approval process.  Now a few days after I patched it and uploaded a second version to v1.0.1.  Of course, the first version had not approved yet because it was only a few days.  Now I would have assumed that the examiners would reazlied with output a v1.0.0 and v1.0.1 in my queue that they should have only watched v1.0.1 (latest!)

  They don't do well.  They have reviewed and approved v1.0.0 for sale and v1.0.1 is still being investigated.  How is it comes to the process?  Why review and approve what has obviously been patched with an update?  Now, I don't want to approve the app for sale until the follow-up is considered.

  Should I have deleted the v1.0.0?  Should I have resubmitted a cool application?  What all do you when this process seems backward and useless?

  Hi HybridMind,

  I don't know why the examiner may have missed v1.0.1 but I have run it through a review and has approved.

  We apologize for the confusion.

• Is it possible to easily view the status of the approval process for a specific campaigns without having to open it?

  Hello

  Is it possible to easily view the status of the approval process for a specific campaign without having to open it?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes. Campaigns launch area, select open an existing campaign.

  Thank you

  edynamic expert Eloqua

• Questions about the approval process

  I'm currently waiting on my plug-in to be approved and it has been about 2 days... to better manage my own and our customers expectations on updates of the extension that we have done, I have a few questions:

  • I have been informed that approval takes up to 2 weeks. Is it possible to speed up the process?
  • Is there a way to see the status of your approval beyond "submitted changes?
  • After approval, the addition of extension patches also require an approval process?
  • After approval, updates like text descriptions or image updates require an approval process?

  Thank you for your time and consideration, any help is appreciated.

  (1) maybe if you write an email to [email protected]

  (2) no

  (3) Yes

  (4) Yes

• Planning approval processes in 11.1.2.2 - 'approved' to 'not started '.

  
  Hello

  We are on the planning of the 11.1.2.2.Last year, we used a unit planning with "Custom" hierarchy to activate approvals and "Free-form" model options Now the planning unit is in status 'approved' as budget process is completed last year. We plan to launch our budget next year.

  How can I change the status of the workflow to "not started".

  Please suggest

  Thank you

  You will use the same planning units and the same approval process, used to you? all you need to do is start again.

  Don't forget: once an administrator excludes a unit planning, all annotations and history associated with the planning unit are ignored. Status of the planning unit is returned to not started and the owner is set to non-owner. However, the data values are kept. The stored data will include retail support.

  See you soon... !!

  Rahul S.