IOS VPN LAN Local access

Similar Questions

• How to configure the VPN LAN to access the internet from the remote network

  I have set up for our project site to another Office VPN. Please join.
  Now I have already configured Site to site vpn between ASA 5510 and 1841 router.

  HQ LAN

  Branch of the LAN
                   10.2.1.0/24 > ASA 5510 1841 > > INTERNET < 1841=""> <> 10.30.3.0/24
  ^
  ^
  ^
  ^
  Call Manager
  No. 2851
  Now access from branch LAN LAN of HQ each other.

  I face problems that are
  (1) in the direction of LAN, they can access HQ LAN & resource, but cannot access the internet. I did not configure NAT on the router PH
  (2) can I access internet BRANCH LAN via HQ LAN INTERNET. Where can I access the Internet of general management of the LAN of the PH router directly while access to the VPN to the local network of HQ?
  (3) in the Site of the Directorate, phone hard cannot work but phone on PC can call to Headquarters. Hard IP phone are same in remote network (172.16.1.0/24 ). What's the problem? How can I configure separately?

  Please give advise me how should I do.

  Hello

  (1) in the direction of LAN, they can access HQ LAN & resource, but cannot access the internet. I did not configure NAT on the router PH

  Answer:

  You must configure the NAT and crossed to the ASA HQ so that the VPN branch router provides LAN and u-Turn, access to Internet of the SAA.  You must first seup NAT for the branch on the SAA router subnet, then you must type the command:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  Here's a great example for VPN client hairpining.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

  (2) can I access internet BRANCH LAN via HQ LAN INTERNET. Where can I access the Internet of general management of the LAN of the PH router directly while access to the VPN to the local network of HQ?

  Yes, you can

  (3) in the Site of the Directorate, phone hard cannot work but phone on PC can call to Headquarters. Hard IP phone are same in remote network (172.16.1.0/24 ). What's the problem? How can I configure separately?

  You must change your subnet VLANS to be different from the subnet HQ voice phone IP VOice VLAn, it should be fine.

  Kind regards

  Mohamed

• Filtering of VPN and local access to the remote site

  Hello

  I set up vpn, filtering on all my VPN l2l. I have limited access to remote resources at the local level to the specified ports. It works perfectly.

  But I want to have as full access from local to remote networks (but still retain the remote access to the local level). VPN filter now works as I have two-way with a simple ACL. So is it possible to open all the traffic from the local to remote and all by limiting the remote to the local traffic?

  ASA 5520 8.4 (3)

  Thanks in advance

  Tomasz Mowinski

  Hello

  Well let's say you have a filtering ACL rule when you allow http local network traffic to the remote host

  LAN: 10.10.10.0/24

  remote host: 192.168.10.10/32

  The filter ACL rule is the following:

  FILTER-ACL access-list permit tcp host 192.168.10.10 eq 80 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  I think that this ACL rule would mean also that until the remote host has been using source port TCP/80, it may access any port on any host tcp in your local network as long as it uses the source TCP/80 port.

  I guess you could add a few ranges of ports or even service groups of objects to the ACL rules so that not all well-known ports would be accessible on the LAN. But I guess that could complicate the configurations.

  We are usually management customer and completely different in ASA L2L VPN that allows us to all traffic on another filtering device and do not work in this kind of problems. But of course there are some of the situations/networks where this is not only possible and it is not a feasible option for some because of the costs of having an ASA extra.

  Please indicate if you have found any useful information

  -Jouni

• Even IOS VPN Interface Internet Access issue

  Hi all

  I was wondering if there was any equivalent to these orders of ASA 5510 to put on a cisco IOS router 2811.

  Split-tunnel-policy excludespecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list LOCAL_LAN_ACCESS

  What I want to achieve is to give internet access to my vpn users without creating a split tunnel, which means the vpn user turns off the Internet on the same interface on that their vpn router ends.

  Is a 2811 for this there docs? I could not find the doc for it...

  TIA,

  -Fred

  Try this link

  Public Internet on a stick

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/products_configuration_example09186a008073b06b.shtml#intro

  Rgds

  Jorge

• Based on the IOS VPN Lan-to-Lan (NAT and route map Questions)

  Hello world

  I worked on my review of CCNA security and I have a question about this stage

  LAN1 192.168.0.0/24---(routeur HQ)--10.10.10.0/30--(INTERNET)--20.20.20.0/30--(routeur Branch) - LAN2 192.168.1.0/24

  I use 10.10.10.0/30 and 20.20.20.0/30 networks assuming that these are public addresses (is just a laboratory).

  I read that if I want to make the VPN tunnel while I using NAT I must exclude valuable traffic from the NAT process so I look on the database of cisco for more help and I found this (look at the 3660 router configuration):

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008045a2d2.shtml#T1

  so, I applied this config for my routers, so the config is:

  IP nat inside source map route sheep interface fastEthernet0/1

  access list 110 deny ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access list 119 permit ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 any

  sheep allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 110

  I didn't really understand who is using the command route-map here, so I made this configuration:

  IP nat inside list sheep interface FastEthernet0/1

  sheep extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Licensing ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  Two of them worked I could translate my LAN addresses to the public to address internet and also could establish the VPN tunnel. So my questions are:

  1. What is the purpose of the road-map command?

  2. What is the difference between these two configuration?

  3. which one I should use and in what cases?

  Thanks in advance

  Jose

  Jose,

  Very good questions and in fact no need to the road map it.

  Personally, I like using course maps because it allows much more flexibility than simply ACL setup, but in order to bypass the NAT source IPs, there is no need of route-maps and you can do this with the ACL directly.

  I personally always use road-maps just because I can (route-maps are cool) haha

  Route-maps are very useful in other scenarios where you need to put more of conditions or factors.

  Remember that it is almost always more than one method to accomplish a task... which is one of those cases.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• Unable to access the remote VPN LAN

  My VPN ends very well, but cannot access the local network. The warning is the LAN is a public good 24 subnet.  I'm not sure how to NAT the LAN to access the VPN subnet and not to disturb any other functionality.  I have attached the configuration.

  Thank you in advance.

  ciscoasa # sh run
  : Saved
  :
  ASA Version 8.2 (2)
  !
  ciscoasa hostname
  activate the encrypted Anuj/1RTcTy/SmZO password
  2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted passwd
  names of
  !
  interface Vlan1
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  IP address .149.200 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Vlan2
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  IP address *.165.37.131 255.255.255.248
  !
  interface Vlan5
  No nameif
  security-level 50
  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/3
  !
  interface Ethernet0/4
  !
  interface Ethernet0/5
  switchport access vlan 5
  !
  interface Ethernet0/6
  !
  interface Ethernet0/7
  !
  passive FTP mode
  clock timezone GMT 0
  standard permit access list MASTERPWRTRANS_splitTunnelAcl *. . 149.0 255.255.255.0
  allow inside_nat0_outbound to access extensive ip list *. . 149.0 255.255.255.0 172.30.110.0 255.255.255.224
  pager lines 24
  Enable logging
  asdm of logging of information
  Within 1500 MTU
  Outside 1500 MTU
  local pool POOL1 172.30.110.1 - 172.30.110.30 IP 255.255.255.224 mask
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  don't allow no asdm history
  ARP timeout 14400
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  Global (outside) 2 *.165.37.132
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound
  NAT (inside) 2 *. .149.199 255.255.255.255
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  static (exterior, Interior) *. .149.199 *.165.37.132 netmask 255.255.255.255
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 * 1.165.37.134
  Timeout xlate 03:00
  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
  Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
  Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
  Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
  RADIUS protocol Server AAA MPT
  AAA server MPT (inside) host .149.210
  Timeout 5
  key *.
  AAA authentication enable LOCAL console
  the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
  Enable http server
  http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
  http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors
  No snmp server location
  No snmp Server contact
  Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac
  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 pfs Group1 set
  Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5
  outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
  outside_map interface card crypto outside
  crypto ISAKMP allow outside
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  md5 hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  Telnet *. . 149.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  Telnet timeout 5
  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors
  SSH timeout 5
  Console timeout 0
  management-access inside

  a basic threat threat detection
  Statistics-list of access threat detection
  no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
  WebVPN
  internal MASTERPWRTRANS group policy
  MASTERPWRTRANS group policy attributes
  value of DNS server *. . 149.10 *. . 149.11
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  value of Split-tunnel-network-list MASTERPWRTRANS_splitTunnelAcl
  MCI.local value by default-field
  ptiadmin encrypted BtOLil2gR0VaUjfX privilege 15 password username
  mptadmin U2T.1fmOIe772zE username password / encrypted
  type tunnel-group MASTERPWRTRANS remote access
  attributes global-tunnel-group MASTERPWRTRANS
  POOL1 address pool
  TPM authentication server group
  Group Policy - by default-MASTERPWRTRANS
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group MASTERPWRTRANS
  pre-shared key *.
  !
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  maximum message length automatic of customer
  message-length maximum 512
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the preset_dns_map dns
  inspect the ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect the h323 ras
  inspect the rsh
  inspect the rtsp
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect the skinny
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect xdmcp
  inspect the sip
  inspect the netbios
  inspect the tftp
  Review the ip options
  !
  global service-policy global_policy
  context of prompt hostname
  Cryptochecksum:820529ed70de923a8375694004b2544c
  : end
  ciscoasa #.

  The 2821 should have a route pointing to the ASA for the VPN address pool (because the ASA is not the default gateway for the LAN).

  That should do it.

  Federico.

• IOS VPN L2L + C2L (cisco IPSEC client)

  Hello

  need to configure a C2L (client to the LAN) vpn on a cisco router where there is already an ipsec vpn.

  !!! already configured on the ROUTER

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  address of cisco key crypto isakmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac Tunnel

  !

  crypto dynamic-map 10 Road-Tunnel

  game of transformation-Tunnel

  match address 115

  !

  !

  !

  !

  Crypto map 10 ipsec-isakmp Crypto-Tunnel Dynamic Channel-Tunnel

  !

  point-to-point interface ATM0/1/0.1

  card crypto Crypto-Tunnel

  !

  access-list 115 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.168.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 115 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 115 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  !!! new configuration for cisco ipsec client

  !

  no address Cisco key crypto isakmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  address of cisco key crypto isakmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 no.-xauth

  !

  AAA new-model

  !

  AAA authentication login AutClient local

  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

  !

  !

  username 0 pippo pippo

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group vpnclient

  key 0-pippo

  DNS 10.10.10.10

  WINS 10.10.10.20

  domain cisco.com

  pool ippoolvpnclient

  Save-password

  ACL 188

  !

  !

  card crypto Crypto-Tunnel client authentication list AutClient

  card crypto Crypto-Tunnel isakmp authorization list groupauthor

  card crypto Crypto-Tunnel client configuration address respond

  card crypto Crypto-ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap Tunnel 20

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  match address 188

  Set transform-set RIGHT

  !

  !

  !

  !

  IP local pool ippoolvpnclient 10.99.0.1 10.99.0.30

  !

  access-list 188 note #.

  access-list 188 note # split tunneling VPN C2L

  access-list 188 allow ip 10.99.0.0 0.0.0.31 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  can you tell me if the new configuration is OK?

  Thank you all

  NOT the ACL should be the opposite. Sound from the point of view of the router.

  access-list 188 allow ip 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.5.0.0 0.0.0.31

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Only local access while using the USB modem

  Hi, I have a laptop dell inspiron with Vista home premium preinstalled in it. For about 3 years I use GPRS (internet) with modem USB on it without problem. It was working fine but application stopped working 15 days before. I tired every thing from different forums but the only "Local access" message is fix... now, after trying a lot of different things I get of the internet world for 5 minutes but it goes to new local only access. But within 5 minutes no Web site is too load. I have no problem with my connection to the LAN and wireless. They both work fine(I hv tested). Its only for my nokia usb modem. I HAV tried to use GPRS to different operators, but it is givin local only access for all, and when consulted internet in all mobile phones are workign fine.  I also tried to use microsoft fix but it gave an error file not found and ignored den and ran some checks of registrey and claimed restart. But no change in connectivity.
  Help, please.

  Hello

  ·          Update you the network card with the latest drivers?

  Method 1:

  I suggest that you disable Antivirus software and firewall temporarily on your computer and check if you are able to connect.

  Note: Please make sure that you enable the antivirus software and firewalls after the test to keep your computer protected.

  Method 2:

  You can try the manual steps suggested in the following article:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/928233

  Note: serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: (http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Back-up-the-registry ) how to back up and restore the registry in Windows)

• L2L IOS VPN question

  Hello

  I created a vpn between two routers in two different sites. The VPN works well, but I noticed something that I can ping from peer1 at peer2 however the tunnel although the ACL of the interesting traffic allows no icmp between two counterparts, it is configured as follows:

  access-list 120 allow ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 120 allow ip 1.1.1.1 host 2.2.2.2

  No icmp is allowed, but the icmp traffic is encapsulated, encrypted, and through the tunnel, why?

  Hello moahmed1981,

  When you configure access-list for IPs, so it includes ICMP, TCP, and UDP, therefore, it is expected that you will be able to ping across the tunnel.

  If you want to change this, please configure the VPN filter to prevent the ping to the vpn tunnel.
  Here's a doc for your reference:-
  https://popravak.WordPress.com/2011/11/07/Cisco-IOS-VPN-filter/

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• Remote VPN users cannot access tunnel from site to site

  Cisco ASA5505.

  I have a tunnel of site-to-site set up from our office to our Amazon AWS VPC.  I'm not a network engineer and have spent way too much time just to get to this point.

  It works very well since within the office, but users remote VPN can not access the tunnel from site to site.  All other remote access looks very good.

  The current configuration is here: https://gist.github.com/pmac72/f483ea8c7c8c8c254626

  Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.  It is probably super simple for someone who knows what they're doing to see the question.

  Hi Paul.

  Looking at your configuration:

  Remote access:

  internal RA_GROUP group policy
  RA_GROUP group policy attributes
  value of server DNS 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  value of Split-tunnel-network-list Split_Tunnel_List

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
   
  type tunnel-group RA_GROUP remote access
  attributes global-tunnel-group RA_GROUP
  address RA_VPN_POOL pool
  Group Policy - by default-RA_GROUP
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group RA_GROUP
  pre-shared key *.
   
  local pool RA_VPN_POOL 10.0.0.10 - 255.255.255.0 IP 10.0.0.50 mask

  Site to site:

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address acl-amzn
  card crypto outside_map 1 set pfs
  peer set card crypto outside_map 1 AWS_TUNNEL_1_IP AWS_TUNNEL_2_IP
  card crypto outside_map 1 set of transformation transformation-amzn
   
   
  I recommend you to use a local IP address pool with a different IP address that deals with the inside interface uses, now you are missing NAT are removed from the IP local pool to the destination of the site to site:
   
  NAT_EXEMPT list of ip 10.0.0.0 access allow 255.255.255.0 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0
   
  NAT (outside) 0-list of access NAT_EXEMPT
   
  Now, there's a dynamically a NAT exempt allowing traffic to go out and are not translated.
   
  I would like to know how it works!
   
  Please don't forget to rate and score as correct the helpful post!
   
  Kind regards
   
  David Castro,
   
   

• VPN; list of access on the external interface allowing encrypted traffic

  Hi, I have a question about the access list on the external interface of a router 836. We have several routers on our clients site, some are lan2lan, some are client2router vpn.

  My question is; Why should I explicitly put the ip addresses of the client vpn or tunnel lan to the access list. Because the encrypted traffic to already allowing ESPs & isakmp.

  The access list is set to the outgoing interface with: ip access-group 102 to

  Note access-list 102 incoming Internet via ATM0.1

  Note access-list 102 permit IP VPN range

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.123.32.0 0.0.0.255 192.123.33.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 102 permit ip 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 102 permit esp a whole

  Note access-list 102 Open VPN Ports and other

  access-list 102 permit udp any host x.x.x.x eq isakmp newspaper

  I have to explicitly allow 192.123.32.0 (range of lan on the other side) & 14.1.1.0 (range of vpn client) because if I'm not I won't be able to reach the network.

  The vpn connection is not the problem, all traffic going through it.

  As far as I know, allowing ESPs & isakmp should be sufficient.

  Can anyone clarify this for me please?

  TNX

  Sebastian

  This has been previously answered on this forum. See http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.ee9f970/0#selected_message for more details.

• L2l ios VPN does not

  Hi all

  I am reproducing my client on the GNS scénarion.

  It is a frank l2l ios vpn and I use on two NAT routers.

  When I train trigger (ping using the source interface) VPN, VPN is not coming, and there is no error during the isakmp debug

  Please go through the configuration below and suggest me

  Thanks toufik

  It does not appear to be configured for each LAN routing. May need to configure the default route on each router to point to the other.

  In addition, enabling the option 'enable isakmp crypto '.

  All the other configuration looks OK.

• AnyConnect VPN users cannot access remote subnets?

  I googled this until blue in the face without result.  I don't understand why Cisco this so difficult?  When clients connect to the anyconnect vpn, they can access the local subnet, but cannot access the resources in remote offices.  What should I do to allow my anyconnect vpn clients access to my remote sites?

  Cisco 5510 8.4

  Hello

  What are remote sites using as Internet gateway? Their default route here leads to the ASA or have their own Internet gateway? If they use this ASA for their Internet connection while they should already have a default route that leads traffic to the VPN to the pool, even if they had no specific route for the VPN itself pool. If they use their own local Internet gateway and the default route is not directed to this ASA then you would naturally have a route on the remote site (and anything in between) indicating the remote site where to join the pool of 10.10.224.0/24 VPN network.

  In addition to routing, you must have configured for each remote site and the VPN pool NAT0

  Just a simple example of NAT0 configuration for 4 networks behind the ASA and simple VPN field might look like this

  object-group network to REMOTE SITES

  object-network 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  object-network 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0

  object-network 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0

  object-network 10.10.40.0 255.255.255.0

  network of the VPN-POOL object

  10.10.224.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  NAT static destination DISTANCE-SITES SITES source (indoor, outdoor) REMOTE static VPN-VPN-POOL

  The above of course assumes that the remote site are located behind the interface 'inside' (although some networks, MPLS) and naturally also the remote site networks are made for the sake of examples.

  Since you are using Full Tunnel VPN should be no problem to the user VPN transfer traffic to this ASA in question.

  My first things to check would be configuring NAT0 on the ASA and routing between remote sites and this ASA (regarding to reach the VPN pool, not the ASA network IP address)

  Are you sure that the configuration above is related to this? Its my understanding that AnyConnect uses only IKEv2 and the foregoing is strictly defined for IKEv1?

  -Jouni

• VPN clients cannot access to the vlan

  Hello

  I just changed my flat lan to a virtual LAN environment multi, but now I need help to get to my VPN back working again as the VPN user can access servers that are not on the vlan 'door '.  I've read enough to know that it is probably associated with NAT, but I'm not sure where to put this information.

  Does go in the NAT, associated with the E0 interface (outgoing internet gateway), to the vlan10 (vlan router is actually on) or can I create a new one and apply it to the crypto ipsec and isakmp side of things that use VPN users?

  My network is configured as such...

  VPN client - Router1811 - split trunk - C3550 - 12G - shared - resources multiple C3550s - servers/Wstns

  The router subnet 192.168.10.0 as all switches, VLAN is set up through the 12 G and all other switches as vtp "vtp clients", including the router.  The user can get to the 10 subnet and any server on it, but not to the"farm" on the subnet 192.168.11.0.

  I noticed Federico has been working on something very similar to this... but any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you, Don

  Hi Don,

  Please mark this discussion as resolved if there is no other problem with this VPN.

  See you soon,.

  Nash.

• Local Access Mode - manual removal via WAN connection

  I would like to set up local access to some desktop computers, but want to use the option of manual control (pg 254 of the admin View 4.6 guide) I released the base image which was published on the forwarding server, but when a user try to complete the payment process they get the error "a connection to the forwarding server could not be established. Please check your network settings. They are able to see their jobs right and that it points to the base image they received via other channels of distribution (and not directly from the servers of the view)

  My security server firewall is configured to allow the ports on the JMS, JMSIR, AJP13 connection server, http, https and PCoIP but how to configure the forwarding server to adapt to configuration or are there alternatives to opening ports on the server to transfer inside the LAN of business if I want to just use it for access in local mode

  Hi Mobcdi,

  Option 1 (tunnel) description says "network traffic is routed via the view connection server or a server security if one is configured."

  Sequence - 1 is seems more correct, but with slight modifications.

  Form SS must be a SSL connection to TS, because all local traffic is routed directly between the SS and TS

  Firewall rules of back-end on Page 61 of the www. VMware.com/pdf/view-46-architecture- planning.pdf said

  "If you configure the connection to the server display to use SSL for operations in local mode and office supply, security servers using port 443 for downloads and the replication between the local mode desktops and server transfer."

  -noble