L2L IOS VPN question

Hello

I created a vpn between two routers in two different sites. The VPN works well, but I noticed something that I can ping from peer1 at peer2 however the tunnel although the ACL of the interesting traffic allows no icmp between two counterparts, it is configured as follows:

access-list 120 allow ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

access-list 120 allow ip 1.1.1.1 host 2.2.2.2

No icmp is allowed, but the icmp traffic is encapsulated, encrypted, and through the tunnel, why?

Hello moahmed1981,

When you configure access-list for IPs, so it includes ICMP, TCP, and UDP, therefore, it is expected that you will be able to ping across the tunnel.

If you want to change this, please configure the VPN filter to prevent the ping to the vpn tunnel.
Here's a doc for your reference:-
https://popravak.WordPress.com/2011/11/07/Cisco-IOS-VPN-filter/

Kind regards
Dinesh Moudgil

PS Please rate helpful messages.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

L2l ios VPN does not

Hi all

I am reproducing my client on the GNS scénarion.

It is a frank l2l ios vpn and I use on two NAT routers.

When I train trigger (ping using the source interface) VPN, VPN is not coming, and there is no error during the isakmp debug

Please go through the configuration below and suggest me

Thanks toufik

It does not appear to be configured for each LAN routing. May need to configure the default route on each router to point to the other.

In addition, enabling the option 'enable isakmp crypto '.

All the other configuration looks OK.

IOS VPN L2L, placement and discuss best practices

We install an IOS router VPN on a for L2L 2651XM VPN bundle.

I am trying to determine the best placement for the VPN router.

We have Internet BR, then switch outside, Pix, then inside the switch.

We have installed a card 4 ports in the Pix 515e to provide the DMZ interface, but have not yet configured all interfaces.

L2L is B2B and we need so our traffic/internal network firewall/NAT.

I have a switch for the DMZ if necessary for additional PSS.

I recommend you to place the VPN router outside of the interface on the outside of the firewall. Ending inside the unencrypted VPN interface on port DMZ on the PIX, in this way, you can use the pix to control which internal servers users VPN can connect to.

This way you can your traffic inside nat, but your VPN traffic to not cross a line of nat. Your VPN users also allow the pix to access your internet connection

On the VPN router lock the outside as much as possible interface, if the IOS supports the functionality defined firewall and then use it.

L2l using routers Cisco VPN question

I can successfully configure an L2L IPSec VPN between two ASAs but using a similar configuration on Cisco routers, I can't establish a tunnel ping to the local LAN interface on the other, but two, NY and Burlington, routers can ping each and other WAN interface. Here is the configuration of routers and a version of the show; I have attached the config files complete and the screenshot of the topology.
I appreciate all help.
The f

F0/0 - ISP - F0/0 Burlington NY

See the version

Cisco IOS Software, software 3600 (C3640-IK9S-M), Version 12.4 (25), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Updated Thursday, August 18, 10 06:59 by prod_rel_team

ROM: ROMMON emulation Microcode
ROM: 3600 Software (C3640-IK9S-M), Version 12.4 (25), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

The availability of NY is 0 minutes
System returned to ROM by unknown charge cause - suspect boot_data [BOOT_COUNT] 0 x 0, BOOT_COUNT 0, BOOTDATA 19
System image file is "tftp://255.255.255.255/unknown".

Cisco 3640 (R4700) Prozesseur (revision 0xFF) 124928K / 6144K bytes of memory.
Card processor ID FF1045C5
R4700 CPU at 100 MHz, 33, Rev 1.2 implementation
2 FastEthernet interfaces
Configuration of DRAM is wide with parity 64-bit capable.
125K bytes of NVRAM memory.
8192 K bytes of processor onboard flash system (read/write)

Configuration register is 0 x 2102

NY router

crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
address of ThisIsAWeekKey key crypto isakmp 172.16.2.2
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac L2L
!
Burlington 1-isakmp ipsec crypto map
defined peer 172.16.2.2
game of transformation-L2L
match address Burlington-NW
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
address 172.16.1.2 IP 255.255.255.252
automatic duplex
automatic speed
card crypto Burlington
!
interface FastEthernet1/0
IP 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
no ip address of the http server
no ip http secure server
!
IP forward-Protocol ND
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.1
!
!
Burlington-NW extended IP access list
ip licensing 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255

Burlington router

crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
address of ThisIsAWeekKey key crypto isakmp 172.16.1.2
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac L2L
!
NY 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined peer 172.16.1.2
game of transformation-L2L
match address NY - NW
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.252
automatic duplex
automatic speed
card crypto NY
!
interface FastEthernet1/0
IP 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
no ip address of the http server
no ip http secure server
!
IP forward-Protocol ND
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1
!
!
NY - NW extended IP access list
IP 10.0.2.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255

No problem, we learn every day

Please kindly marks the message as answered while others can also learn from your post. Thank you.

With the help of ASA 5510 L2L and VPN L2TP

I would let my remote users access to all resources bhind the ASA and my remote branches.

Here's my setup. ASA5510 as a hub to the data center.

172.21.x.x of internal network directly connected

DMZ directly connected 172.22.1.x.x

L2L branch1 VPN 10.47.x.x

L2L branch2 VPN 10.47.y.x

172.21.y.x remote users L2TP Windows Client

I can access my internal resources related to the ASA but not the DMZ or branch offices. I need injection road routing and reverse?

You also need to configure crossed. http://goo.GL/vLqAR

IOS VPN LAN Local access

It has been 7 years, this feature available in the IOS is still?

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/263861

Basically I connect Cisco VPN for an IOS VPN client. I want everything, except for the local subnets some tunnel. A little like split tunneling except internet traffic goes through the VPN.

Thank you

Hi Steven,

As I said refuse statements do not work with split-ACL, but what you can do is to rebuild the split-acl. Delete rejects him and the "permit ip any any" instead you will have to allow all the internet... to clarify, in your case, it seems that you don't want to tunnel all traffic to the following subnets:
1. 10.32.0.0/16
2. 10.34.0.0/16
3. 10.42.0.0/16
4. 10.252.0.0/16
so in your case the split-acl must include all other possible subnets. While this will make the really long acl, it's the only way to do that. The acl can be reduced by using appropriate summarizations. for example

128.0.0.0 generic 127.255.255.255

Kind regards

ATRI.

L2l - a non-reachable subnet VPN question

Hi people,

I have a strange problem with a new VPN connection and would appreciate any help.

I have a pair of Cisco asa 5540 s configured as a failover pair (code version 8.2 (5)).

Recently, I added 2 new VPN L2L - these two VPNS come from the same interface on my ASA (called Internet service provider) and both are to the same customer, but they end the different firewall on the end of cusomter and different client subnets traffic encryption.    There is a basic network diagram attached.

1 - the VPN is for customer subnet 10.2.1.0/24 traffic.    Devices in this subnet should have access to 2 subnets on my network - DMZ 211 (192.168.211.0./24) and DMZ 144 (192.168.144.0/24).    This VPN working properly.

2 - the VPN is for the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 customer traffic.    Devices in this subnet should be able to access the same 2 subnets on my network - DMZ 211 (192.168.211.0./24) and DMZ 144 (192.168.144.0/24).    What VPN does not work - the client can access 144 DMZ, but not of DMZ 211.

There is a SAs isakmp and ipsec for two virtual private networks.    I noticed that the program/decaps packages counter does not increment when the client sends the test traffic to 211 of the DMZ. This counter will increment when they send traffic test to DMZ144.   I also see the traffic sent to 144 DMZ customer subnet 192.168.1.0/24 in packet capture on the interface DMZ 144 of the ASA.   I don't see similar traffic capture on the interface DMZ211 (although I can see the traffic sent to DMZ211, if it is from 10.2.1.0/24 - IE when using VPN1)

Exemption of NAT is configured for 192.168.1.0/24 and 10.2.1.0/24.

There is a road to two client subnets via the same next hop.

There is nothing in the unknown newspapers 192.168.1.0/24 traffic has been ignored

I suspect that this may be a problem on the client side, but I would like to be able to prove that.   Specifically, I'd like to really be able to capture traffic destined to 211 DMZ on the interface of the firewall after her Internet service provider has been deciphered - I don't know if this can be done however, and I haven'treally has found a good way to prove or disprove that the 192.168.1.0/24 DMZ211 VPN traffic coming to my ASA Internet service provider interface and show what happens to This traffic, after his arrival.

Here is the relevant vpn configuration:

MY_CRYPTO_MAP 90 crypto card matches the address VPN_2

card crypto MY_CRYPTO_MAP 90 set peer 217.154.147.221

crypto 90 MY_CRYPTO_MAP the transform-set 3dessha value card

card crypto set MY_CRYPTO_MAP security-association life 90 seconds 86400

crypto MY_CRYPTO_MAP 100 card matches the address VPN_1

card crypto MY_CRYPTO_MAP 100 set peer 193.108.169.48

crypto MY_CRYPTO_MAP 100 the transform-set 3dessha value card

card crypto MY_CRYPTO_MAP 100 set security-association second life 86400

crypto MY_CRYPTO_MAP isp interface card

ASA # sh access-list VPN_2

VPN_2 list of access; 6 elements; hash name: 0xa902d2f4

permit for access list 1 VPN_2 line extended ip object-group VPN_2_NETS 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0x56c7fb8f

access-list 1 permit line VPN_2 extended 192.168.144.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 45) 0x93b6dc21

access-list 1 permit line VPN_2 extended ip 192.168.211.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 6) 0x0abf7bb9

access-list 1 permit line VPN_2 extended ip host 192.168.146.29 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 8) 0xcc48a56e

ASA # sh VPN_1 access-list

VPN_1 access list; 3 elements; hash name: 0x30168cce

access-list line 1 license VPN_1 extended ip 192.168.144.0 255.255.252.0 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 6) 0 x 61759554

allowed to Access - list line 2 VPN_1 extended ip 192.168.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa602c97c

allowed to Access - list VPN_1 line 3 extended ip host 192.168.146.29 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0) 0x7b9f32e3

nonatdmz144 (dmz144) NAT 0 access list

nonatdmz211 (dmz211) NAT 0 access list

ASA # sh access-list nonatdmz144

nonatdmz144 list of access; 5 elements; hash name: 0xbf28538e

access-list 1 permit line nonatdmz144 extended 192.168.144.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 (hitcnt = 0) 0 x 20121683

allowed to Access-list nonatdmz144 line 2 extended 192.168.144.0 ip 255.255.255.0 172.28.2.0 255.255.254.0 (hitcnt = 0) 0xbc8ab4f1

permit for access list 3 nonatdmz144 line scope ip 192.168.144.0 255.255.255.0 194.97.141.160 255.255.255.224 (hitcnt = 0) 0xce869e1e

allowed to Access-list nonatdmz144 line 4 extended 192.168.144.0 ip 255.255.255.0 172.30.0.0 255.255.240.0 (hitcnt = 0) 0xd3ec5035

permit for access list 5 nonatdmz144 line scope ip 192.168.144.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0) 0x4c9cc781

ASA # sh nonatdmz211 access-list | in 192.168\.1\.

permit for access list 3 nonatdmz1 line scope ip 192.168.211.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0) 0x2bbfcfdd

ASA # sh nonatdmz211 access-list | in 10.2.1.

allowed to Access-list nonatdmz1 line 4 extended ip 192.168.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0) 0x8a836d91

Route ISP 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 137.191.234.33 1

Route ISP 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 137.191.234.33 1

Thanks in advance to anyone who's looking good!

Darragh

The counters of compensation was a good idea. If the counter is not incremented and ping the remote side is not cause future VPN it certainly confirms that something is not working properly.

It might be interesting to wait the SAs time out and go idle and test it again with the ping to the remote subnet that does not work. Turn on debugging for ISAKMP and see if there is an attempt of negotiation. Especially if you don't get any attempt to open ISAKMP then so it would be a way of showing that there is a problem on the remote site.

Certainly, the ASA has the ability to capture packets. I've used this feature and it can be very useful. I have not tried to make a catch on the external interface for incoming VPN traffic and so not sure if you would be available to capture the encrypted packet or the off encrypted packet. You can configure an access list to identify traffic capture and I guess you could write an access list that included the two addresses as source and destination peer to capture encrypted traffic and the Scriptures that were unencrypted source and destination subnets to capture traffic after encryption.

HTH

Rick

Based on the IOS VPN Lan-to-Lan (NAT and route map Questions)

Hello world

I worked on my review of CCNA security and I have a question about this stage

LAN1 192.168.0.0/24---(routeur HQ)--10.10.10.0/30--(INTERNET)--20.20.20.0/30--(routeur Branch) - LAN2 192.168.1.0/24

I use 10.10.10.0/30 and 20.20.20.0/30 networks assuming that these are public addresses (is just a laboratory).

I read that if I want to make the VPN tunnel while I using NAT I must exclude valuable traffic from the NAT process so I look on the database of cisco for more help and I found this (look at the 3660 router configuration):

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008045a2d2.shtml#T1

so, I applied this config for my routers, so the config is:

IP nat inside source map route sheep interface fastEthernet0/1

access list 110 deny ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

access list 119 permit ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 any

sheep allowed 10 route map

corresponds to the IP 110

I didn't really understand who is using the command route-map here, so I made this configuration:

IP nat inside list sheep interface FastEthernet0/1

sheep extended IP access list

deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

Licensing ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

Two of them worked I could translate my LAN addresses to the public to address internet and also could establish the VPN tunnel. So my questions are:

1. What is the purpose of the road-map command?

2. What is the difference between these two configuration?

3. which one I should use and in what cases?

Thanks in advance

Jose

Jose,

Very good questions and in fact no need to the road map it.

Personally, I like using course maps because it allows much more flexibility than simply ACL setup, but in order to bypass the NAT source IPs, there is no need of route-maps and you can do this with the ACL directly.

I personally always use road-maps just because I can (route-maps are cool) haha

Route-maps are very useful in other scenarios where you need to put more of conditions or factors.

Remember that it is almost always more than one method to accomplish a task... which is one of those cases.

It will be useful.

Federico.

IOS VPN L2L + C2L (cisco IPSEC client)

Hello

need to configure a C2L (client to the LAN) vpn on a cisco router where there is already an ipsec vpn.

!!! already configured on the ROUTER

!

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

md5 hash

preshared authentication

address of cisco key crypto isakmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

!

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac Tunnel

!

crypto dynamic-map 10 Road-Tunnel

game of transformation-Tunnel

match address 115

!

!

!

!

Crypto map 10 ipsec-isakmp Crypto-Tunnel Dynamic Channel-Tunnel

!

point-to-point interface ATM0/1/0.1

card crypto Crypto-Tunnel

!

access-list 115 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.168.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 115 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 115 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

!

!!! new configuration for cisco ipsec client

!

no address Cisco key crypto isakmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

address of cisco key crypto isakmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 no.-xauth

!

AAA new-model

!

AAA authentication login AutClient local

AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

!

!

username 0 pippo pippo

!

crypto ISAKMP policy 10

BA 3des

preshared authentication

Group 2

!

ISAKMP crypto client configuration group vpnclient

key 0-pippo

DNS 10.10.10.10

WINS 10.10.10.20

domain cisco.com

pool ippoolvpnclient

Save-password

ACL 188

!

!

card crypto Crypto-Tunnel client authentication list AutClient

card crypto Crypto-Tunnel isakmp authorization list groupauthor

card crypto Crypto-Tunnel client configuration address respond

card crypto Crypto-ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap Tunnel 20

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

!

Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

match address 188

Set transform-set RIGHT

!

!

!

!

IP local pool ippoolvpnclient 10.99.0.1 10.99.0.30

!

access-list 188 note #.

access-list 188 note # split tunneling VPN C2L

access-list 188 allow ip 10.99.0.0 0.0.0.31 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

!

can you tell me if the new configuration is OK?

Thank you all

NOT the ACL should be the opposite. Sound from the point of view of the router.

access-list 188 allow ip 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.5.0.0 0.0.0.31

Concerning

Farrukh

Cisco AnyConnect VPN question

I am ASA 5505 that I am of is running correctly by using the AnyConnect client. The question is, can I connect to the fine external interface, but cannot ping or attach them to any host on the inside. When I connect, it accepts the user name and password, and I can run the ASDM or SSH to the firewall very well, but not further. In the control, after I log in, I get an IP address inside, of the order of 10.7.30.x as expected.

Following configuration:

: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.2 (5)
!
asa5505 hostname
domain BLA
activate the password * encrypted
passwd * encrypted
no names

!
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
switchport access vlan 150
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
!
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 10.7.30.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP EXTERNAL IP 255.255.255.128
!
interface Vlan150
nameif WLAN_GUESTS
security-level 50
IP 10.7.150.1 255.255.255.0
!
boot system Disk0: / asa825 - k8.bin
config to boot Disk0: / running-config
passive FTP mode
clock timezone STD - 7
DNS server-group DefaultDNS
domain BLA
permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
object-group service tcp Webaccess
port-object eq www
EQ object of the https port
object-group network McAfee
network-object 208.65.144.0 255.255.248.0
network-object 208.81.64.0 255.255.248.0
access extensive list ip 10.7.30.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.24.0 255.255.252.0
access extensive list ip 10.7.30.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.24.0 255.255.252.0
access extensive list ip 10.7.30.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any host 159.87.30.252 eq smtp
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any host 159.87.30.136 Webaccess object-group
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any host 159.87.30.243 Webaccess object-group
access-list extended outside_access_in permit tcp host 159.87.70.66 host 159.87.30.251 eq lpd
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any host 159.87.30.252 Webaccess object-group
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any host 159.87.30.245 Webaccess object-group
outside_access_in list extended access permitted tcp object-group McAfee any eq smtp
permit access list extended ip 172.16.10.0 outside_access_in 255.255.255.0 10.7.30.0 255.255.255.0
outside_access_in list extended access permit ip host 159.87.64.30 all
standard access list vpn_users_splitTunnelAcl allow 10.7.30.0 255.255.255.0
IPS_TRAFFIC of access allowed any ip an extended list
access extensive list ip 10.7.30.0 outside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 any
inside_access_in list extended access permit udp 10.7.30.0 255.255.255.0 any eq snmp
access extensive list ip 10.7.30.0 outside_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0
pager lines 24
Enable logging
asdm of logging of information
host of logging inside the 10.7.30.37
Debugging trace record
Within 1500 MTU
Outside 1500 MTU
MTU 1500 WLAN_GUESTS
local pool VPN_POOL 10.7.30.190 - 10.7.30.200 255.255.255.0 IP mask
no failover
ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
ASDM image disk0: / asdm-645 - 206.bin
don't allow no asdm history
ARP timeout 14400
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
NAT (outside) 0-list of access outside_nat0_outbound
NAT (WLAN_GUESTS) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
public static 159.87.30.251 (Interior, exterior) 10.7.30.50 netmask 255.255.255.255
public static 159.87.30.245 (Interior, exterior) 10.7.30.53 netmask 255.255.255.255
public static 159.87.30.252 (Interior, exterior) 10.7.30.30 netmask 255.255.255.255
public static 159.87.30.243 (Interior, exterior) 10.7.30.19 netmask 255.255.255.255
public static 159.87.30.136 (Interior, exterior) 10.7.30.43 netmask 255.255.255.255
Access-group inside_access_in in interface inside the control plan
Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 159.87.30.254 1
Route inside 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.7.30.1 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
Floating conn timeout 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
AAA-server ADWM-FPS-02 nt Protocol
AAA-server ADWM-FPS-02 (inside) host 10.7.30.32
Timeout 5
auth-domain NT ADWM-FPS-02 controller
AAA-server ADWM-FPS-02 (inside) host 10.7.30.49
auth-DC NT ADWM-DC02
AAA authentication http LOCAL console
AAA authentication LOCAL telnet console
the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
Enable http server
http 206.169.55.66 255.255.255.255 outside
http 206.169.50.171 255.255.255.255 outside
http 10.7.30.0 255.255.255.0 inside
http 206.169.51.32 255.255.255.240 outside
http 159.87.35.84 255.255.255.255 outside
SNMP-server host within the 10.7.30.37 community * version 2 c
location of the SNMP server *.
contact SNMP Server
Community SNMP-server
Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map pfs set 20 Group1
card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap
peer set card crypto outside_map 1 206.169.55.66
map outside_map 1 set of transformation-ESP-3DES-MD5 crypto
card crypto outside_map 2 match address outside_cryptomap
peer set card crypto outside_map 2 159.87.64.30
card crypto outside_map 2 game of transformation-ESP-AES-192-SHA
map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map
outside_map interface card crypto outside
Crypto ca trustpoint *.
Terminal registration
full domain name *.
name of the object *.
MYKEY keypairs
Configure CRL
Crypto ca trustpoint A1
Terminal registration
fqdn ***************
name of the object *.
MYKEY keypairs
Configure CRL
Crypto ca trustpoint INTERMEDIARY
Terminal registration
no client-type
Configure CRL
Crypto ca trustpoint _SmartCallHome_ServerCA
Configure CRL
Crypto ca trustpoint ASDM_TrustPoint0
Configure CRL
Crypto ca trustpoint ASDM_TrustPoint1
Configure CRL
ca encryption certificate chain *.
certificate ca 0301
BUNCH OF STUFF
quit smoking
A1 crypto ca certificate chain
OTHER LOTS of certificate
quit smoking
encryption ca INTERMEDIATE certificate chain
YET ANOTHER certificate
quit smoking
Crypto ca certificate chain _SmartCallHome_ServerCA
certificate ca LAST BOUQUET
quit smoking
crypto ISAKMP allow outside
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
preshared authentication
3des encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 86400
No encryption isakmp nat-traversal
Telnet 10.7.30.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 30
SSH 206.169.55.66 255.255.255.255 outside

SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
management-access inside
dhcpd 4.2.2.2 dns 8.8.8.8
!
dhcpd address 10.7.150.10 - 10.7.150.30 WLAN_GUESTS
enable WLAN_GUESTS dhcpd
!

a basic threat threat detection
Statistics-list of access threat detection
no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
SSL encryption rc4 - md5 of sha1
SSL-trust A1 out point
WebVPN
allow outside
AnyConnect essentials
SVC disk0:/anyconnect-dart-win-2.5.2019-k9.pkg 1 image
enable SVC
attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec svc webvpn
internal VPNUsers group strategy
Group Policy VPNUsers attributes
value of server DNS 10.7.30.20
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec svc webvpn
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
value of Split-tunnel-network-list vpn_users_splitTunnelAcl
dwm2000.WM.State.AZ.us value by default-field
Split-dns value dwm2000.wm.state.az.us
username HCadmin password * encrypted privilege 15
attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultWEBVPNGroup
address VPN_POOL pool
authentication-server-group ADWM-FPS-02
strategy - by default-VPNUsers group
tunnel-group 206.169.55.66 type ipsec-l2l
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 206.169.55.66
pre-shared key *.
tunnel-group 159.87.64.30 type ipsec-l2l
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 159.87.64.30
pre-shared key *.
!
class-map IPS_TRAFFIC
corresponds to the IPS_TRAFFIC access list
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum 512
Policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect the preset_dns_map dns
inspect the ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect the h323 ras
inspect the rsh
inspect the rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect the skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect the sip
inspect the netbios
inspect the tftp
inspect the icmp
Review the ip options
class IPS_TRAFFIC
IPS inline help
!
global service-policy global_policy
field of context fast hostname
anonymous reporting remote call
call-home
Profile of CiscoTAC-1
no active account
http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService destination address
email address of destination [email protected] / * /
destination-mode http transport
Subscribe to alert-group diagnosis
Subscribe to alert-group environment
Subscribe to alert-group monthly periodic inventory
monthly periodicals to subscribe to alert-group configuration
daily periodic subscribe to alert-group telemetry
Cryptochecksum:e70de424cf976e0a62b5668dc2284587
: end
ASDM image disk0: / asdm-645 - 206.bin
ASDM location 159.87.70.66 255.255.255.255 inside
ASDM location 208.65.144.0 255.255.248.0 inside
ASDM location 208.81.64.0 255.255.248.0 inside
ASDM location 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0 inside
ASDM location 159.87.64.30 255.255.255.255 inside
don't allow no asdm history

Anyone have any ideas?

Hello

Please, add this line in your configuration and let me know if it works:

access extensive list ip 10.7.30.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 10.7.30.0 255.255.255.0

I ask you to add that it is because you have not specified any exceptions for the return shipping. Once you add to it, will allow you to go through the tunnel VPN, packets back. When this command is not there, you will be able to access everything on the SAA but nothing behind it.

Let me know if it helps.

Thank you

Vishnu

nat VPN question.

Try to find what happened. I had the remote end raise the tunnel, as they can ping resources on my side. I am unable to ping 10.90.238.148 through this tunnel. I used to be able to until the interface of K_Inc has been added. The network behind this interface is 10/8.

I asked a question earlier in another post and advises him to play opposite road of Cryptography. And who did it. I was able to ping 10.90.238.148 of 192.168.141.10, with the config below.

I am at a loss to why I can't all of a sudden. A bit of history, given routes have not changed. By adding the command set opposite road to cryptography, I find myself with a static entry for the 10.90.238.0 network is what fixed it initially so I don't think it's a problem of route. The remote end had an overlap with the 192.168.141.0/24 that is why my side is natted on the 10.40.27.0. None of the nats have changed so if adding the reverse route worked for a day, it should still work. Any thoughts?

interface GigabitEthernet0/3.10

VLAN 10

nameif K_Inc

security-level 100

IP address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0

interface GigabitEthernet0/3.141

VLAN 141

cold nameif

security-level 100

IP 192.168.141.254 255.255.255.0

(Cold) NAT 0 access-list sheep

NAT (cold) 1 192.168.141.0 255.255.255.0

Access extensive list ip 192.168.141.0 CSVPNOFFSITE allow 255.255.255.0 10.90.238.0 255.255.255.0

Access extensive list ip 10.40.27.0 CSVPNOFFSITE allow 255.255.255.0 10.90.238.0 255.255.255.0

Access extensive list ip 192.168.141.0 CSVPNNAT allow 255.255.255.0 10.90.238.0 255.255.255.0

IP 10.40.27.0 allow Access-list extended sheep 255.255.255.0 10.90.238.0 255.255.255.0

static 10.40.27.0 (cold, outside) - CSVPNNAT access list

card crypto Outside_map 5 corresponds to the address CSVPNOFFSITE

card crypto Outside_map 5 the value reverse-road

card crypto Outside_map 5 set pfs

card crypto Outside_map 5 set peer 20.x.x.3

Outside_map 5 transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 crypto card game

card crypto Outside_map 5 defined security-association life seconds 28800

card crypto Outside_map 5 set security-association kilobytes of life 4608000

tunnel-group 20.x.x.3 type ipsec-l2l

20.x.x.3 Group of tunnel ipsec-attributes

pre-shared-key *.

Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 7.x.x.1 1

Route 10.0.0.0 K_Inc 255.192.0.0 192.168.10.252 1

Route K_Inc 10.64.0.0 255.224.0.0 192.168.10.252 1

Route K_Inc 10.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.252 1

Route K_Inc 10.128.0.0 255.128.0.0 192.168.10.252 1

Tunnel is up:

14 peer IKE: 20.x.x.243

Type: L2L role: answering machine

Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

EDIT:

I just noticed when tracer packet i run I don't get a phase VPN or encrypt:

Packet-trace entry cold tcp 192.168.141.10 80 80 10.90.238.148 det

Phase: 1

Type: FLOW-SEARCH

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new stream

Phase: 2

Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

Subtype: entry

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

in 10.90.238.0 255.255.255.0 outside

Phase: 3

Type: IP-OPTIONS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

Direct flow from returns search rule:

ID = 0xad048d08, priority = 0, sector = option-ip-enabled, deny = true

hits = 2954624, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol

SRC ip = 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0, port = 0 =

DST ip = 0.0.0.0 mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

Phase: 4

Type: QOS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

Direct flow from returns search rule:

ID = 0xb2ed4b80, priority = 72, domain = qos by class, deny = false

hits = 2954687, user_data = 0xb2ed49d8, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol

SRC ip = 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0, port = 0 =

DST ip = 0.0.0.0 mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

Phase: 5

Type: FOVER

Subtype: Eve-updated

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

Direct flow from returns search rule:

ID = 0xad090180, priority = 20, area = read, deny = false

hits = 618776, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0 x 0, flags = 0 x 0, Protocol = 6

SRC ip = 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0, port = 0 =

DST ip = 0.0.0.0 mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

Phase: 6

Type: NAT

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

static (ColdSpring, external) 74.x.x.50 192.168.141.10 netmask 255.255.255.255

match ip host 192.168.141.10 ColdSpring outside of any

static translation at 74.x.x.50

translate_hits = 610710, untranslate_hits = 188039

Additional information:

Definition of static 192.168.141.10/0 to 74.112.122.50/0 using subnet mask 255.255.255.255

Direct flow from returns search rule:

ID = 0xac541e50, priority = 5, area = nat, deny = false

hits = 610742, user_data = 0xac541c08, cs_id = 0 x 0, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol

SRC ip = 192.168.141.10, mask is 255.255.255.255, port = 0

DST ip = 0.0.0.0 mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

Phase: 7

Type: NAT

Subtype: host-limits

Result: ALLOW

Config:

static (ColdSpring, dmz) 192.168.141.0 192.168.141.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

match ip ColdSpring 192.168.141.0 255.255.255.0 dmz all

static translation at 192.168.141.0

translate_hits = 4194, untranslate_hits = 20032

Additional information:

Direct flow from returns search rule:

ID = 0xace2c1a0, priority = 5, area = host, deny = false

hits = 2954683, user_data = 0xace2ce68, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol

SRC ip = 192.168.141.0, mask is 255.255.255.0, port = 0

DST ip = 0.0.0.0 mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

Phase: 8

Type: IP-OPTIONS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

Reverse flow from returns search rule:

ID = 0xaacbcb90, priority = 0, sector = option-ip-enabled, deny = true

hits = 282827537, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol

SRC ip = 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0, port = 0 =

DST ip = 0.0.0.0 mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

Phase: 9

Type: QOS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

Reverse flow from returns search rule:

ID = 0xb2ed5c78, priority = 72, domain = qos by class, deny = false

hits = 4749562, user_data = 0xb2ed5ad0, cs_id = 0 x 0, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol

SRC ip = 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0, port = 0 =

DST ip = 0.0.0.0 mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

Phase: 10

Type: CREATING STREAMS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

New workflow created with the 339487904 id, package sent to the next module

Information module for forward flow...

snp_fp_inspect_ip_options

snp_fp_tcp_normalizer

snp_fp_translate

snp_fp_adjacency

snp_fp_fragment

snp_fp_tracer_drop

snp_ifc_stat

Information for reverse flow...

snp_fp_inspect_ip_options

snp_fp_translate

snp_fp_tcp_normalizer

snp_fp_adjacency

snp_fp_fragment

snp_fp_tracer_drop

snp_ifc_stat

Phase: 11

Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

Subtype: output and contiguity

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional information:

found 7.x.x.1 of next hop using ifc of evacuation outside

contiguity Active

0007.B400.1402 address of stretch following mac typo 51982146

Result:

input interface: cold

entry status: to the top

entry-line-status: to the top

output interface: outside

the status of the output: to the top

output-line-status: to the top

Action: allow

What version are you running to ASA?

My guess is that your two static NAT is configured above policy nat you have configured for the VPN? If this is the case, move your above these static NAT NAT policy and you should see the traffic start to flow properly.

--

Please note all useful posts

IPhone and cisco vpn question

All, I have an IPhone and I'm VPN'ing in a SAA with IOS 8.2.2. I do not have vpn'ing of issues, but I have a question that is causing quite a stir here. When I try to use names rather than IP addresses (trying to access a server or an internal Web site), the client does not receive DNS answers. I can get to the servers via IP, but not by the name of the server. I can use the same PCF file for my laptop, and it works fine. Someone at - it a resolution to this scenario? Any help appreciated.

Add the domain name in the attributes of Group Policy: -.

value by default-domain MYDOMAIN.COM

Manish

l2l ASA vpn issues

Hi all

I have two firewalls that I'm trying to implement VPNs l2l between them. Once of them is an old wall of sonic and the other 5505.

I put in all and ends the phase 1/2 and the tunnel rises however no traffic passes through

Here is my configuration

ASA (outside, 192.168.30.1) asa internal 192.168.10.0/25

(Outside 192.168.30.2) SonicWALL sonicwall 192.168.20.0/24

I have an accesslist that is configured on the asa and applied to the cypto card using card crypto XXXX 1, atch address YYY

However when I watch the news ebugging on the console it says: "cannot locate the output for UDP of XXXX interface: 192.168.10.10/1 to 192.178.20.1/0.

any ideas why this is?

I just need a static route to say all traffic on asa with 192 source... 10.0 should go through 192.168.30.2?

I guess it's the work of crypto card

Am I wrong?

Hello

Begins to seems to me you have a filter ACL configured for your L2L VPN VPN and also the ACL filter of VPN and Crypto ACLs are the same things, which means you use a simple both ACL.

Why I think it's like this is the fact that you say that your VPN L2L cross trading in the "packet-tracer" VPN Phase means Crypto VPN L2L ACL was correct. At the same time say you that the connection was stopped to the Phase of the VPN USER. He points to a VPN filter ACL being configured.

In view of the foregoing, I also know that the ACL of filter for the L2L VPN behave with a logic different than typical ACL interface. In VPN L2L the ACL filter ALWAYS mention the remote network as the source ALWAYS and your Local network as the destination.

If add you an ACL rule with order switched networks appears this fixes the VPN filter ACL problems and finally allowed traffic. Naturally I can only guess that I saw actual configurations at this point (which, usually with release "packet - trace", help to solve a problem faster just guessing)

If you indeed filter VPN, you may be able to track him down with the following commands

See the tunnel-group race

Check if a "group policy" is defined then the command

See establishing group policy enforcement

This output should list the name of the ACL filter VPN if its game

Regarding the installantion auto road. The default setting for ASA, is that it will create NO static routes automatically depending on the VPN configurations. This must be enabled manually in "crypto map" configurations, or you can configure static routes manually.

ASA tracking to default TCP and UDP connections. ICMP is inspected only if his permit. By default, it is NOT inspected.

Hope this helps

Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

Feel free to ask more if necessary.

-Jouni

Ike ASA VPN question

Hello all, I have problem with an IPSec tunnel and always looking what is exatly the problem. Have 2 ASA AAA. AA. AAA. A and BBB. BB. BBB. B where BBB. BB. BBB. B has 2 interfaces LAN is another DSL modem. When there is no problem with LAN tunnel is ACTIVE, but when I ALS rocking a few errors on the tunnel:

IP = AAA. AA. AAA. One, received an INVALID_COOKIE unencrypted notify message, drop

IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, package in double Phase 1 detected. Retransmit the last packet.

SH isakmp sa is:

ITS enabled: 1

Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)

Total SA IKE: 1

1 peer IKE: AAA. AA. AAA. A

Type: user role: initiator

Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG4

If the router is waiting for ack but not expected and there is no package.

At both ends, I deleted:

cry clear isa

cry clear ipsec

I checked the peer addresses are correct, what is bodering me, it's the missing package. I think that this packet is sent to the other interface which is down and so the other ASA cannot get the negotiation.

I will be grateful if anyone can help, I'll debug and sniff for that.

Here are the configs and small on isakmp debug information

Router AAA. AA. AAA. A config:

outside_cryptomap_60 list of allowed ip extended access object-US-VPN VPN - US group object

Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 XXX. XX. XX.1 1

Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

card crypto outside_map 60 match address outside_cryptomap_60

game card crypto outside_map 60 peers BBB. BBB. BB. B CC. CCC. C.CCC

card crypto outside_map 60 value transform-set ESP-AES-SHA

life safety association set card crypto outside_map 60 28800 seconds

card crypto outside_map 60 set security-association life kilobytes 4608000

outside_map interface card crypto outside

ISAKMP allows outside

part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

ISAKMP policy 10 sha hash

10 2 ISAKMP policy group

ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

tunnel-group BBB. BBB. BB. B type ipsec-l2l

tunnel-group BBB. BBB. BB. B ipsec-attributes

pre-shared-key *.

ASA BBB. BB. BBB. B:

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac

life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_cryptomap_1

card crypto outside_map 1 set of AAA peers. AA. AAA. A

card crypto outside_map 1 the value transform-set ESP-SHA-3DES ESP-AES-SHA

outside_map interface card crypto outside

card crypto outside_map interface outsideadsl

crypto ISAKMP allow inside

crypto ISAKMP allow outside

ISAKMP crypto enable outsideadsl

crypto ISAKMP policy 10

preshared authentication

3des encryption

sha hash

Group 2

life 86400

ISAKMP crypto am - disable

debugging isakmp 127

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, IKE initiator: New Phase 1, Intf inside, IKE Peer AAA. AA. AAA. A local Proxy 192.168.0.0, address remote Proxy 192.167.0.0, Card Crypto (outside_map)

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Building ITS ISAKMP payload

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Payload has, worm 02 NAT-Traversal vid construction

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Payload has, worm 03 NAT-Traversal vid construction

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, building Fragmentation VID + load useful functionality

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + SA (1) the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 148

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. One Message RECEIVED from IKE_DECODE (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 108

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. ITS payload processing

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Oakley proposal is acceptable

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. VID payload processing

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, received Fragmentation VID

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: Mode aggressive True: True

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Construction ke payload

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Construction nonce payload

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Building Cisco Unity VID payload

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Xauth V6 VID payload construction

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, Send IOS VID

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A payload the IOS Vendor ID theft construction ASA (version: 1.0.0 capabilities: 20000001)

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Construction VIDEO payload

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. One, send Altiga/Cisco VPN3000/Cisco ASA GW VID

28 Dec 11:58:01 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + KE (4) + (10) NUNCIO seller (13) + the seller (13) + the seller (13) + the seller (13) + (0) NONE total length: 256

28 Dec 11:58:07 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0

28 Dec 11:58:07 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. One Message RECEIVED from IKE_DECODE (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 108

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. ITS payload processing

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Oakley proposal is acceptable

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. VID payload processing

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, received Fragmentation VID

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: Mode aggressive True: True

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Treatment IKE payload

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 2

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. Building ITS ISAKMP payload

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, building Fragmentation VID + load useful functionality

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HER (1), SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 108

28 Dec 11:58:09 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A Message from FORWARDING IKE_DECODE (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + KE (4) + NUNCIO (10) + SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + (0) NONE total length: 256

28 Dec 11:58:10 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. One Message RECEIVED from IKE_DECODE (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + NOTIFY (11) + NONE (0) overall length: 68

28 Dec 11:58:10 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. One Message RECEIVED from IKE_DECODE (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + NOTIFY (11) + NONE (0) overall length: 68

28 Dec 11:58:10 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. One, received an INVALID_COOKIE unencrypted notify message, drop

28 Dec 11:58:10 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A, exchanging information processing failed

No degDec 28 11:58:12 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: pitcher: a message key acquisition, spi 0 x 0

28 Dec 11:58:12 [IKEv1]: IP = AAA. AA. AAA. A Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages are treated when SA P1 is finished.

Don't know if that's the only issue, but to start you need a 'tunnel-group C.C.C.C' ASA A.

If there is still a problem, download him debugs on both sides at the same time please.

Also, what version of the software the ASA work, and how you simulate the failure on the main interface of B? Is it possible that in your test one can always happen to B through its main interface?

HTH

Herbert

Messages of the 10.0.2 iOS app question (heavy battery drain!)

Hello

I noticed a problem with the Messages app iOS 10.0.2. Since the update, this app is highly draining the battery...

for the English people (10 minutes on screen, 5, bottom of 5 h;).

I do not use Message as well!

Is there a work around for this problem? I've lost 30% of battery in 2 hours on an iPhone 7 +.

Stone

Hi pierrezep,

Thanks for the update to iOS 10.02! I understand that after the update your Messages application uses a very high amount of your battery. You can try to force quit the Messages app and relaunch. Force a nearby application on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch

If this does not resolve the problem, try the advice contained in this link to maximize the life of your iPhone's battery. Maximize the life and the life of the battery

This should solve your problems for sure battery drain! Please use the Apple Support communities to post your question.

Have a great day.

L2L IOS VPN question

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for